You are on page 1of 2

Tiu V CA to all those belonging to the same class.

The court in
explaining the nature of the protection clause cited
Facts Ichong v. Hernandez[8] said:
According to Executive order No. 97 A (EO 97-A) the
grant and enjoyment of the tax and duty incentives ..It does not demand absolute equality among residents; it merely
requires that all persons shall be treated alike, under like
mentioned in RA 7227 is applicable only to the business
circumstances and conditions both as to privileges conferred and
enterprises and residents within the fenced in area of the liabilities enforced. The equal protection clause is not infringed by
Subic Special Economic Zone (SSEZ). legislation which applies only to those persons falling within a
specified class, if it applies alike to all persons within such class,
Petitioner contends that it EO 97-A violative of their and reasonable grounds exist for making a distinction between
rights to the equal protection of the law. Citing RA 7227 , those who fall within such class and those who do not.
SSEZ is composed of (1) the City of Olongapo, (2) the
Municipality of Subic in Zambales, and (3) the area formerly The Classification in order to be valid, must
occupied by the Subic Naval Base. Petitioner contends that
(1) rest on substantial distinctions,
EO 97-A violates their rights to equal protection of the law,
because the applicability of the enjoyment of tax incentives (2) be germane to the purpose of the law,
is applicable only to the present fenced-in former Subic
Naval Base excluding those who are within SSEZ but outside (3) not be limited to existing conditions only, and
the fenced area. (4) apply equally to all members of the same class.
Issue: Whether or not EO 97-A violates the equal protection The purpose if RA 7227 is to accelerate the
of rights of the people and establishment within SSEZ but conversion of military reservations into productive uses. It
outside the fenced in area. pertains to the land covered under the 1947 Military Bases
Agreement
Ruling:
1) Rest on substantial distinctions
No. The Court rules in favor of the validity of the
assailed EO. The order is not violative of the equal There are substantial differences:
protections clause nor is it discriminatory. According to the
court there is a valid and reasonbale classification because the investors that are being lured to operate
there is a substantive distinction between the circumstances industries inside the secured are big investors
obtaining inside and outside the Subic Naval Base. compared to those who are operating outside.
The economic impact of those who will be operating
The fundamental right of equal protection of the laws is not inside will be national while in the second only local.
absolute, but is subject to reasonable classification. If the Even more important, at this time the business
groupings are characterized by substantial distinctions that activities outside the secured area are not likely to
make real differences, one class may be treated and have any impact in achieving the purpose of the law,
regulated differently from another. The classification must which is to turn the former military base
also be germane to the purpose of the law and must apply
to productive use for the benefit of the Philippine (3) not be limited to existing conditions only
economy
The executive issuance does not apply merely to
2.) be germane to the purpose of the law existing conditions. The objective is to establish a self-
sustaining, industrial, commercial, financial and investment
The delimited application of some incentives to the confines center in the area. There will, therefore, be a long-term
of the former Subic military base, the specific area which the difference between such investment center and the areas
government intends to transform and develop from outside it.
its status quo ante as an abandoned naval facility into a self-
(4) apply equally to all members of the same class.
sustaining industrial and commercial zone, particularly for
big foreign and local investors. Why the seeming bias for big classification applies equally to all the resident individuals
investors? Undeniably, they are the ones who can pour huge and businesses within the secured area. The residents,
investments to spur economic growth in the country and to being in like circumstances or contributing directly to the
generate employment opportunities for the Filipinos, the achievement of the end purpose of the law, are not
ultimate goals of the government for such conversion. The categorized further. Instead, they are all similarly treated,
classification is, therefore, germane to the purposes of the both in privileges granted and in obligations required
law.

You might also like