Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Performance Turnaround
This employee attitude survey case study from PGA Group Consulting Psychologists gives an insight to the
construction, implementation and outcomes of an employee attitude survey.
This case study shows how factors which were impeding organizational performance, morale and
development were identified and addressed to the benefit of the organization, its people and other
stakeholders.
Client
The Danish subsidiary of a UK parent company (which is itself a subsidiary of a major multinational
corporation).
Business
A computer equipment manufacturer.
Location
Copenhagen, Denmark (the study was conducted in English and in Danish, the final report and clients
feedback were in English).
Background
The employee attitude survey was commissioned by the UK parent company of a Danish subsidiary. The
Danish subsidiary had been acquired by the UK company two years earlier.
Prior to the acquisition, the subsidiary was a privately held exclusive distributor of the parents products in
the Danish and broader Scandinavian markets. The subsidiarys customers were dealers, not end users.
The former owners of the subsidiary had remained in the company in the capacity of Directors for a
transition period. Subsequently, the former owners had been replaced by a British Managing Director (who
was not fluent in the Danish language) and his senior team.
The official operating language of the company worldwide is English. Management are required to be fluent
in English, whatever their nationality and mother tongue.
It had been identified by the company previously that the Danish staff and, to a somewhat lesser extent the
Danish customers perceived the senior management team to be ignorant of Danish business culture,
practices, and the nature of the Danish domestic market. Reportedly, it was felt locally also that the UK
parent was remote, unsupportive, and generally unsympathetic to the needs of its subsidiary.
Whether real or not, these perceptions had taken on a life of their own and seemed linked to the presence
of friction and lessened company performance. The Danish company was ailing financially anyway and these
issues did not help the parents objective of turning its subsidiary around. The UK parent had reached the
point of considering the closure of its Danish subsidiary company.
The UK Board of the parent company decided though to adopt a completely open mind and to fully explore
its options before reaching any decision. They decided to find out what the real issues were. Hence, the UK
Board commissioned this study (together with a psychological audit of the capabilities and style of the
management conducted in tandem by us, alongside an internal commercial audit of the business).
The general needs to be satisfied by the employee attitude survey were to:
Tell the company what managers and staff think of the effectiveness of existing initiatives and
programmes.
Identify the changes and refinements that managers and staff would like to see introduced.
Prevent wasting money being spent on irrelevant management or staff development schemes.
Help managers and staff understand their roles and their contribution within the organization.
Involve managers and staff as contributors to changes in management and staff development
policy, and in company policy broadly.
In addition to the general needs above, the company had a range of specific needs to be satisfied, namely
the need to:
Monitor transition from a previously owned proprietorial business to a subsidiary business.
Measure the effects of company management over the previous two years.
Methodology
Pilot Work
Open-ended interviewing of a representative sample of individuals across the subsidiary company functions
was conducted to provide a base starting point.
A broad range of topics concerning company structures, systems, management, roles and morale were
examined.
The data were collected during a 40 minute duration interview of company personnel.
The data were analysed and recurrent themes were identified and translated into a form suitable for further
examination.
The employee attitude survey consisted of two complementary parts: the completion of the questionnaire,
and a confidential personal interview.
The questionnaire was divided into ten sections, comprising 92 items in total. The items were mainly of
multiple choice format (semantic scale and yes/no responses). There were a small number of open-ended
questions also. The format was designed to be completed within the 45 minutes allocated for the task. In
addition to answering the questions, staff were asked also to identify the most important issues as they saw
them. The staff were asked also to identify those issues which either had not been examined hitherto, or
had been examined in a way which did not enable them to express adequately their opinion.
The latter two tasks formed the basis for a subsequent staff interview with a consultant. In addition,
miscellaneous issues were explored and reported, where relevant in the final report document.
Data were collected across two days. Where necessary (subject to holidays, and such) several
questionnaires were completed by individuals and later returned by mail. A Danish speaking consultant
psychologist was available, should they be needed to assist participants.
Small sample sizes precluded the subdivision of the sample into meaningful subgroups. Further, an analysis
of subgroups for reporting would have been likely to have brought about a breach of respondent
confidentiality by enabling the identification of specific individual respondents, thereby breaching trust.
Interview data were content-analyzed. The most important items emerged and helped identify and rank
priorities. The identification of other items completed the full examination.
The analysis had revealed that much of the interview data reflected the questionnaire data, but from a more
complex and often more specific context.
Interview data were, therefore given less attention since, although adding to the substantive points raised
by the questionnaire, this was not sufficient in magnitude to play an important role in detailing the report
format. Generally, these data were presented toward the end of the final report.
Results
Questionnaire Data
Controls in their present form were having a stifling effect over time.
Communication
A more sharing and inclusive communication style would have been valued.
Quality of working life was identified as more important than monetary rewards.
A strong commitment to the Danish subsidiary should be signalled by its UK parent company.
UK parent company
Much greater clarification about all relationship and communication aspects was perceived as
necessary.
The Danish subsidiary needed an identity of its own, within the context of its parents identity.
Business environment
The future
Interview Data
The data augmented substantive points already raised from the questionnaire.
Priority topics were confirmed as: Communication; Style, Culture and Morale; Company Senior
Management, and Policies and Procedures.
Issues not previously raised or examined were: Policy; Jobs and Job Satisfaction, and the question
of survival.
General Comments
The relationship between the pilot work and the study itself showed the pilot work to be highly effective.
Approximately 50% of the individuals employed by the company were involved in the pilot work. The
questionnaire data reflected the data obtained from the pilot work.
Every single member of staff was enthusiastic about the survey and about being given the opportunity to
contribute and be heard.
Everyone expected feedback about the results and that something meaningful should happen and be seen
to happen. The UK parent company Board had successfully won the hearts and minds of all within the
subsidiary company.
Outcome
The Board of the UK parent company kept its promise of maintaining an open mind. The results were well
received by all parties.
Subsequently, the entire senior management team of the subsidiary company were replaced by Danes
following a transition period. Some vacancies were filled internally, the remainder externally. Recruits were
assessed psychometrically by us to ensure that: they could do the job, would do the job, and would fit in
with the present and planned future company culture and values.
A more cohesive organization evolved. The subsidiary, and everyone within it became more clear about their
role and objectives. Ties with the UK parent, and between same function and cross function personnel
became stronger; communications and relationships were perceived as more open and honest. Mutual
respect developed and grew.
The subsidiary company ultimately was successfully turned around to the satisfaction of all stakeholders.
Links
You may find these links on our site to be of interest:
Other relevant site navigation links appear at the foot of this page.
I hope you have found this employee attitude survey case study from PGA Group Consulting Psychologists
informative, useful and beneficial.
Should you have any questions, or would like further information, my team and I would be very happy to
help. Details and an e-mail form to contact/locate us can be found here: www.pgagroup.com/contact-pga-
group.html