Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Review
Summary: Chronic thromboembolic pulmonary hypertension (CTEPH), an important cause of severe pulmonary hypertension, is still underdia-
gnosed, mainly due to the insufcient use of V/Q scannning in patients with pulmonary hypertension. This article reviews the current diagnostic
approach and discusses the therapeutic options in this particular form of pulmonary hypertension. Every patient with CTEPH should undergo
an evaluation in a specialised centre with experience in pulmonary arterial endarteriectomy (PEA) as the potentially curative surgical tech-
nique. Partly unresolved questions regard the status of the recently described percutaneous transluminal pulmonary angioplasty and the best
medical treatment in patients with inoperable or recurrent/persistent pulmonary hypertension after PEA.
Key words: Chronic thromboembolic pulmonary hypertension, diagnosis, therapy, pulmonary thrombarteriectomy, riociguat
Introduction Denition
Chronic thromboembolic pulmonary hypertension (CTEPH) CTEPH is defined as precapillary pulmonary hyperten-
has been classified as a separate entity (group 4) within the sion by invasive right heart catheterisation with a mean
realm of pulmonary hypertension, although it shares some pulmonary artery pressure at rest 25 mm Hg and a
important similarities with pulmonary artery hyperten- mean pulmonary arterial wedge pressure 15 mm Hg
sion (PAH) at the level of small vessel changes. The main and documented chronic/organised flow-limiting
reasons for this are the potential curability which is unique thromboemboli in the elastic pulmonary arteries (main,
for patients suffering from pulmonary hypertension, and lobar, segmental, subsegmental) after at least 3 months
an apparently evident pathophysiological mechanism with of effective anticoagulation [1]. Risk factors for the de-
its history of venous thromboembolism. Several reviews velopment of CTEPH are inadequate anticoagulation,
on this topic were recently published [13], which include recurrent thromboembolism and occlusion of proximal
the findings discussed at the last World Symposium on pulmonary arteries. The condition is associated with lu-
Pulmonary Hypertension in Nice 2013. The aim of this ar- pus anticoagulants and/or antiphospholipid antibodies,
ticle is to review the pathophysiological characteristics, the and with elevated FVIII in blood plasma [5]. Other risk
diagnostic work-up and the current therapeutic options of factors include splenectomy, ventriculoatrial shunts, in-
the disease. fected pacemakers, chronic inflammatory conditions,
non-O blood groups, thyroid replacement, and malig-
nancy [6].
Epidemiology
The incidence of CTEPH after a documented venous Pathogenic mechanisms
thromboembolism varies by a factor of 20 among the stud-
ies (from 0.4 to 9.1, (1)) but seems to be <1% if only the After an episode of acute pulmonary embolism, complete
cases after a documented pulmonary embolism are con- resolution may be achieved in 708 5% of all patients 6 to
sidered. The difference in data may be due to referral bias, 12 months after initial PE diagnosis with partial resolution
the difficulty distinguishing between acute PE and CTEPH in the vast majority of the remaining patients [rev. in 7].
on imaging, and a specific patient history of the acute From V/Q scintigraphic studies, we know that the resolu-
event. In a large European registry, only 3 out of 4 patients tion of thrombi appears to reach a plateau after 3 months
with CTEPH reported a history of PE [4]. of adequate treatment [rev. in 7]. The exact mechanisms
why thromboemboli will eventually be transformed in fi- In summary, the mechanisms depicted above in patients
brotic tissue that encroaches the lumen of the pumonary after acute pulmonary embolism could represent a continu-
vessels in up to 30% of patients is not known. Among the um of events that may, in rare instances, result in the clinical
factors for poor thrombus clearance, abnormal genetic entity of CTEPH, which would then be the final stage of that
variants of fibrinogen, predisposing pulmonary endotheli- which Klok et al. called a post-PE syndrome [7].
http://econtent.hogrefe.com${contentReq.requestUri} - Deviprasad K <deviprasad@nes.co.in> - Monday, December 19, 2016 9:51:48 PM - EBSCO Publishing IP Address:140.234.255.9
Treatment
CTEPH is associated with a dismal prognosis in the ab- Prior to the intervention, angiography is currently the
sence of specific intervention. Especially in the presence gold standard for the anatomical assessment of pulmonary
of signs and symptoms of right heart failure the average artery obstructions, which together with right-heart cath-
survival is poor, as demonstrated in a study where it was eterisation is essential for distinguishing proximal, opera-
found to be only 1.7 years after diagnostic catheterisation; ble CTEPH from distal disease. Most patients will have
in contrast, without heart failure, patients lived on average
4.7 years. If the mean pulmonary artery pressure meas-
ured >50 mmHg, the 2-year survival was 20% [14].
All patients should receive life-long anticoagulation in
order to prevent recurrent venous thromboembolism.
Formally, the new direct oral anticoagulants have not
been tested, and until more data are available, it may be
prudent for patients to be anticoagulated with vitamin K
antagonists.
Surgical treatment
haemodynamic abnormalities at rest, but in selected cas- tients with inoperable CTEPH or with persistent/recurrent
es, patients with markedly increased pulmonary vascular pulmonary hypertension after PEA, treated with Riociguat
resistance upon exercise have shown to benefit from surgi- or placebo for 16 weeks (CHEST-1), followed by an open
cal intervention [15]. It must be underscored that patients trial (CHEST-2). After 16 weeks, the 6 minute walking test
should be evaluated only by an expert team in PEA before significantly increased by 46 meters (primary endpoint),
http://econtent.hogrefe.com${contentReq.requestUri} - Deviprasad K <deviprasad@nes.co.in> - Monday, December 19, 2016 9:51:48 PM - EBSCO Publishing IP Address:140.234.255.9
operations may be withheld. Temporal delay to evaluation and also the secondary endpoints NT-proBNP, PVR and
of operability can result in a negative outcome, and medi- WHO-class improved significantly [19]. This agent subse-
cal bridging while postponing a specific assessment is not quently to the positive results of the trial has been licensed
recommended [15]. as the first specific medical treatment for non-operable
The operation is performed in deep hypothermic circu- CTEPH and for persistent pulmonary hypertension after
latory arrest. Dissection of pulmonary arteries of both PEA. Importantly, riociguat cannot be combined with
lungs are performed as distally as possible to minimise PDE5-inhibitors [20], whereas a combination with en-
postoperative residual pulmonary hypertension. Perioper- dothelin antagonists or prostanoids is possible.
ative complications include lung reperfusion injury in
<10% of patients, characterised by pulmonary oedema
and treated by ECMO, and neurocognitive impairment
due to prolonged circulatory arrest. Operative mortality Conclusions
correlates with preoperative pulmonary vascular resist-
ance (PVR) but there are no upper limits of PVR, pulmo- CTEPH, an important cause of severe pulmonary hyperten-
nary artery pressure or parameters of right heart insuffi- sion, is still underdiagnosed, and the use of V/Q scanning as
ciency that preclude surgery. Up to 30% of the patients part of the diagnostic approach in patients with pulmonary
may present with postoperative residual/persistent pul- hypertension is essential. Every patient with CTEPH should
monary hypertension, which negatively influences prog- undergo evaluation in a specialised centre with a large expe-
nostic outcomes. Those patients may be candidates for rience in PEA. Partly unresolved questions regard the status
medical treatment [15]. of BPA and the best medical treatment in patients with inop-
erable or recurrent/persistent PH after PEA.
12. Klok FA, Tesche C, Rappold L, et al. External validation of a tematic review and meta-analysis. Thromb Res 2010; 126:
simple non-invasive algorithm to rule out chronic thromboem- e51 6.
bolic pulmonary hypertension after acute pulmonary embo- 19. Ghofrani HA, DArmini AM, Grimminger F et al. Riociguat for the
lism. Thromb Res 2015; 135: 796-801. treatment of chronic thromboembolic pulmonary hyperten-
13. DArmini AM. Diagnostic advances and opportunities in chron- sion. N Engl J Med 2013; 369: 319 29.
20. Bayer Pharma AG. Adempas (riociguat) EU Summary of Prod-
http://econtent.hogrefe.com${contentReq.requestUri} - Deviprasad K <deviprasad@nes.co.in> - Monday, December 19, 2016 9:51:48 PM - EBSCO Publishing IP Address:140.234.255.9