Professional Documents
Culture Documents
SYRIA
MECHANICAL DESIGN
CHECK LISTS
Contents
Page
1. OBJECTIVE 3
5. MAINTENANCE CHECKLISTS 11
5.1 Maintenance Execution 12
5.2 Special Tools 12
1. OBJECTIVE
The purpose of these checklists is to provide support for Mechanical Discipline Engineers
involved in completing Technical Design reviews.
It may also be used by Field staff and Project Engineers as a 'reference' document for
undertaking design document review responsibilities. However, individuals may wish to
extend the coverage of each section to accommodate specific requirements. It is not
issued, nor it is intended to be used, as a fully comprehensive list of checks/reviews
covering ALL circumstances.
Review of the design documents should ensure that the correct interpretation of the
Scope of Work and Technical Specifications is made, a suitable approach is established
to the design, the correct procedures, Codes and calculation methods are used,
Technical Competence is adequate and correctness in calculations is achieved.
3.2. Pumps
Is the centrifugal compressor specification in line with schedule D6 and API 617.
Has right type of compressor been selected?
Is the centrifugal compressor manufacturer on our AML (Approved Manufacturer List)
Rotor dynamic check;
- lateral critical speeds;
- torsional critical speeds;
- rotor response study.
Performance instruments.
Monitoring instruments.
Materials/NACE requirements.
Case design.
Diaphragm construction.
Impellor construction and location on shaft.
Thrust bearing capacity and rotor axial balance.
Bearings.
Surge control system.
Heat exchangers.
Recycle connection.
Supporting arrangements.
Rotor withdrawal.
System compatibility including blow down.
Head/flow characteristic:
- turndown;
- % pressure rise duty point to surge.
Is the Gas Turbine specification in line with DEP 31.29.70.31 (AFPC schedule to be
developed) and API 616.
Is the Gas Turbine manufacturer on our AML (Approved Manufacturer List)
Capacity of drier.
Efficiency of oil removal.
Safety aspects.
Sizing of driver.
Utility requirements and terminations.
Heat removal from enclosure.
Liaison with instrument/electrical disciplines.
Receivers and drainage.
Ensure machine unloaded at start-up.
Access for maintenance.
Single lift capability?
Is the Heat Exchanger specification in line with schedule I (1,2,3) and TEMA standards.
Has right type Heat Exchanger been selected?
Is the Heat Exchanger manufacturer on our AML (Approved Manufacturer List)
- Locating of tubes;
- baffles;
- gaskets;
- channel;
- shell.
Does the design of the Vessel comply with schedule T and ASME 8 code or BS 5500.
Is the Vessel manufacturer ISO 9002 certified.
Materials selection.
Construction details.
Nozzles and orientation.
Internals.
Relief valves.
Review by process/materials Engineers.
Adequate instrument connections.
Air intake and discharge for same system located on same face or in zones of equal wind
pressure.
Protection of intake and discharge points from wind driven rain and snow.
Standardisation of components.
Suitability of electrical equipment for area classification.
Full commissions of modular HVAC system prior to installation at permanent location.
Check system meets required internal temperature, pressurization and air change
requirements of enclosed areas.
Noise levels.
Separate HVAC systems for hazardous/non-hazardous areas and per module.
Supply extract system penetrating external walls - fitted dampers.
Gas detectors at extract ducts and fresh air intakes.
Air distribution self-balancing to within 80%.
Air filters at all air intakes.
Non-hazardous areas - fan capacity 50% excess.
Heating where required.
Automatic temperature control in areas containing electronics/telecomms.
Airlock doors where required.
Spacing for humidifiers.
Fire/gas dampers at A0/A60 penetrations.
Remote control from ICC.
5. MAINTENANCE CHECKLISTS
Access Requirements
In situ Inspection
Can equipment be easily reached for visual inspection or for NDT?
In situ Repair/Maintenance
Is layout arranged so that any item can be reached, preferably without the use of
scaffolding?
Has sufficient withdrawal/local lay-down area been provided for maintenance?
Has sufficient thought gone into, with regard to safe routes to workshop, etc?
Has sufficient isolation been provided to allow safe in situ repair or removal to workshop?
Does this means of isolation ensure parallel operation of like equipment whilst repair is
taking place?
Is the equipment design in its simplest form conducive with functional and service
conditions? Simple design can mean repair/maintenance carried out by personnel with
minimum training.
Has a modular replacement policy been adopted to allow the replacement of small
assemblies by modular packages?