You are on page 1of 6

Chemical Engineering Science 56 (2001) 621}626

Modelling and simulation of 1,2-dichloroethane production by


ethylene oxychlorination in #uidized-bed reactor
S. M. Al-Zahrani *, A. M. Aljodai, K. M. Wagialla
Chemical Engineering Department, King Saud University, P.O. Box 800, Riyadh 11421, Saudi Arabia
SABIC R&T, P.O. Box 42503, Riyadh 11551, Saudi Arabia

Abstract

A comprehensive reactor model for ethylene oxychlorination for the production of 1,2-dichloroethane in a #uidized-bed reactor is
developed. The model is based on the two-phase theory of #uidization and allows for the change in volumetric gas #ow rate in the
dense phase due to the change in number of moles accompanying the reaction. The model predictions compared favorably with the
industrial data obtained from the literature. The e!ect of di!erent parameters on the behavior of the system is also investigated. It has
been found that the bubble diameter, ethylene molar feed fraction, residence time, and height at minimum #uidization have signi"cant
e!ects on the reactor performance.  2001 Elsevier Science Ltd. All rights reserved.

Keywords: Dichloroethane; Oxychlorination; Ethylene; Fluidized-bed; Modelling; Simulation

1. Introduction overall chemical reaction is


!!  CH CH Cl #H O,
C H #0.5O #2HCl &&
Vinyl chloride monomer (VCM) or (CH "CHCl) is       

the basic feed for the production of polyvinyl chloride
*H"!295 kJ/mol
(PVC), which is one of the most massively produced P
thermoplastics in the chemical industry. The current Typically, the catalyst is composed of cupric chloride
worldwide VCM production capacity is about 24 MM supported on high-surface-area alumina. Although other
ton per year (SRI report, 1998). VCM is produced supports such as graphite, silica gel, calcined Fuller's
commercially by cracking of 1,2 dichloroethane earth, diatomaceous earth, pumice, or kieselguhr may be
(CH CH Cl or EDC) which is manufactured used, alumina is generally preferred because of its perfor-
  
worldwide by either the direct chlorination or oxy- mance, attrition resistance and the ability to control its
chlorination of ethylene. Around 85% of the total EDC surface area (Ullmann, 1986). Other metal salts, such as
production is used for the production of vinyl chloride. potassium, sodium, or aluminum chloride, may be added
10% is used in the production of chlorinated solvents to the catalyst to increase selectivity and reduce volatiliz-
such as 1,1,1-trichloroethane and tri- and tetrach- ation of the copper chloride (Ullmann, 1986).
loroethylene. The rest goes into various processes, mainly Because the oxychlorination reaction is highly
for synthesis of ethylenediamines (Nawroski & Velez, exothermic, substantial quantities of heat must be re-
1983). moved from the reactors. Fluidized-bed reactors have
In commercial ethylene oxychlorination reactors, gas- many advantages in this system. Near-isothermal opera-
eous ethylene, HCl, and air (or oxygen) catalytically react tion can easily be achieved with a well-#uidized catalyst,
at temperatures in excess of 2003C to produce EDC. The giving an overall heat-transfer coe$cient to the cooling
surface in the range of 250}500 W/mK (Smallwood,
Stephenson, Newman & Bunten, 1987).
In #uidized beds, the heat is removed by internal cool-
* Corresponding author. Tel.: #00966-1-4676873; fax: #00966-1- ing coils that are submerged in the #uid bed (Smallwood,
4678-770. Stephenson, Newman & Bunten, 1987). Reaction temper-
E-mail address: szahrani@ksu.edu.sa (S. M. Al-Zahrani). atures are generally controlled in the range 210}2403C.

0009-2509/01/$ - see front matter  2001 Elsevier Science Ltd. All rights reserved.
PII: S 0 0 0 9 - 2 5 0 9 ( 0 0 ) 0 0 2 6 8 - 2
622 S. M. Al-Zahrani et al. / Chemical Engineering Science 56 (2001) 621}626

Because the #uid bed is essentially isothermal, reaction Table 1


conditions are uniform throughout the bed. An optimum The hydrodynamic, transport and physical parameters (Aljodai, 1999)
reactor temperature can be achieved by proper design and
Parameter Theoretical or empirical expression
operation of the heat removal system. Fluidized-bed cata-
lysts must have good structural integrity so that excessive
  
Bed voidage at k   o  
e "0.586
\  E
amounts of "nes are not generated. Care must be taken to minimum KD o g(o !o )d o
E Q E N Q
avoid sticky catalyst particles because catalyst agglomer- #uidization
ation can lead to poor #uidization or loss of #uidization
Super"cial 1.75 150(1!e ) d o (o !o )g
entirely (Ullmann, 1986). Re # KD Re ! N E Q E "0
velocity at e K e K k
In an air-based oxychlorination process, ethylene is minimum KD KD
usually fed in a slight stoichiometric excess relative to o.D .;
#uidization Re " N KD
HCl (1}4% molar), but air may be in substantial excess KD k
(20}50% molar). The objective is to seek high HCl con- Bubble d "d !(d !d )e\ F"
+ + M
version ('98%) but to minimize the loss of ethylene to diameter d "0.652[A(; !; )] 
+ M KD
vent. The use of oxygen permits a more #exible policy. d "0.00376(; !; )
Here it is customary to recycle the major part of the gases M M KD
after EDC and water removal, so it is possible to operate Bubble rising ; "; !; #0.711(gd ) 
@ M KD
with a higher amount of ethylene fed to the reactor. This velocity
gives better HCl conversion and lower organic by-prod- Fraction of ; !;
ucts in the EDC as well as lower losses of unconverted bubble phase d" M KD
;
@
ethylene (Keane, Stobaugh & Townsend, 1973; Wimer

 
& Feathers, 1976). Frequently, this purge may be vented Coe$cient for 1 1 1
" #
to the atmosphere or, if incineration is required, the size mass transfer K K K
@C @ C
of the incineration plank and the amount of support fuel ; D 
used are much less than for air-based oxychlorinations K "4.5 KD #10.4 C
@ d d 
(Wimer & Feathers, 1976; Reich, 1976; Markelo!, 1984).

 
The purpose of this study is to develop a mathematical e D;  
K "6.78 KD @
model to describe the ethylene oxychlorination reaction C d
in a #uidized-bed reactor. In the proposed study, the
   
Coe$cient for ; o C o k C  
rigorous theory of the two-phase #ow was used to model H "4.5 KD E NE #10.4 E E NE
heat transfer @B d d 
the #uidized-bed reactor. The e!ects of operating and

 
design parameters were studied. The parameters include Heat transfer k o (o !o )gd  
h "0.88 E E Q E N
e!ect of feed mole fractions, residence time, bubble dia- coe$cient U d k
N
meter, particle diameter, feed temperature, cooling
medium temperature, pressure, height at minimum #uidiz- Binary 10\. (1/M #1/M ) 
D " G H
di!usivity HG P (< #< )
ation (H ), velocity at minimum #uidization (; ) on the 2 G H
KD KD
reactor performance. The present model was validated Di!usivity in (1!> )
using a real plant data reported in the literature. D " H
HK
 
mixture >
 H
G D
G$H HG
2. Model development

Of the many models proposed in the past, the two- experimental evidence reported by Toor and Calder-
phase model which considers the #uidized-bed reactor to bank (1968) for small-size particles and high #ow rate.
consist of a bubble phase and a surrounding dense phase 3. The dense phase is assumed to be perfectly mixed and
has proved to be the most suitable model, for incorporat- uniform in temperature.
ing recent "ndings on the hydrodynamics of #uidization 4. An average value of the bubble size and hence an
(Werther, 1980). The hydrodynamic and transport prop- average value of the interphase exchange parameter is
erty correlations are listed on Table 1. The details of the used for the whole bed. The e!ective bubble size is
model is given elsewhere (Aljodai, 1999). taken as that which exists at 40% of the expanded bed
height (Fryer & Potter, 1972). This assumption is
2.1. Assumptions widely used (Wagialla, Helal & Elnashaie, 1991; El-
nashaie, Wagialla & Helal, 1991; Adris, 1989; Abshar,
1. The bubble gas is devoid of solids and is in plug #ow. 1994).
2. The extent of reaction in the bubble-cloud phase 5. The mass and heat transfer resistances between the
is negligible. This assumption is justi"ed by the particles and the dense-phase gas are negligible.
S. M. Al-Zahrani et al. / Chemical Engineering Science 56 (2001) 621}626 623

6. The ideal gas law applies to the gas phase in both Energy balance
phases.
o C Q ( ! )!o C Q ( ! )
7. The volumetric #ow rate through the bubble phase is E NE BD D  E NE B B 
constant. #h A ( ! )#A ; o C ( ! )[1!e\@F]
U U U B @ @ E NE D B
#<(1!d)(1!e)(!*H )r"0,
2.2. Reaction kinetics P
where
Several kinetic studies have been reported in the litera-
a"K /; , b"H /; .o .C .
ture for the oxychlorination route for 1,2-dichloroethane @B @ @B @ E NE
production (Carrubba, 1970; Fengqiu, Yongrong, Shunni
& Gatang, 1994; Bakshi et al., 1991; Dmitrieva, Bakshi
& Gelbshtein, 1991; Wachi & Asai, 1994). 3. Results and discussion
In this work, kinetic study reported by Wachi and Asai
(1994) for the process of 1,2-dichloroethane formation Sensitivity analysis was carried out to assess the vari-
was used. This kinetic states that while the reaction ous design, operating as well as hydrodynamic para-
exhibited "rst-order kinetics with regard to the concen- meters on the reactor performance. The reactor design
tration of cupric chloride, the dependency on ethylene and operating conditions used in the simulations are
concentration was interpreted by a Langmuir}Hinshel- listed in Table 2. The heat capacities, di!usivity, the
wood mechanism, however, the reaction sequence prob- density of the gas, and heat of reaction are functions of
ably proceeds via chlorination of ethylene by cupric temperature.
chloride. HCl and oxygen then regenerate the copper
salt. The reaction rate has the following form: 3.1. Validation of model

kK C C The #uidized-bed model is tested against the pilot


r" P ? # !
1#K C plant data reported by Cavaterra (1988) for a pilot plant
? #
working in Italy. It is clear from Table 3 that a very good
where
agreement between the model predictions and industrial
k "269 exp(!37.8/R), K "0.63. values have been obtained for temperature, C H con-
P ?  
version and HCl conversion.
2.3. Mass and energy balances on bubble phase
3.2. Ewect of feed molar distribution
The mass balance on component i and the energy
balance equations in the bubble phase of the #uidized- The ethylene molar #ow rate was varied between
bed reactor at steady state are given below: 0.025 kg mol/s to 0.039 kg mol/s while HCl and oxygen
Mass balances (based on air) #ow rates were kept at 0.064 and
0.0185 kg mol/s, respectively. Fig. 1 shows the HCl and

 
dN N N oxygen conversion and also the EDC production rate. It
G@ "A (K ) GB ! G@ ,
dh @ @B G Q Q is clear from Fig. 1 that as the ethylene molar #ow rate is
B @
increased, the HCl and O conversions and the EDC
at h"0, N "N and N "N . 
G@ G@D GB GBD production increase. At low ethylene feed mole fractions
Energy balance (i.e., less than 0.1947) the ethylene conversion is high and
this is because of the excess availability of HCl and
d oxygen and the shortage of ethylene quantity. After the
Qo C @ "!A (H ) ( ! ),
@ E NE dh @ @B @ @ B ethylene feed ratio reaches 0.1947, the HCl and oxygen
at h"0, " and " .
@ D B D Table 2
Design and operating data used in solving the reactor model
2.4. Mass and energy balances on dense phase
Design and operating data Value
The steady-state dense-phase mass and energy bal-
ances are given below: Bed height at min. #uidization 7.0 m
Bed diameter 3.4 m
Mass balance
Catalyst solid density 3075 kg/m

   
N N Catalyst particle density 1369 kg/m
N "N #A ; GB ! G@D [1!e\?&] Catalyst particle diameter 80 lm
GB GBD @ @ Q Q
B @ Feed temp. 460 K
Cooling medium temp. 360 K
# <(1!d)(1!e)r.
624 S. M. Al-Zahrani et al. / Chemical Engineering Science 56 (2001) 621}626

Table 3
Comparison between model predictions and pilot plant data at
HCl/C H "2
 
Reactor Inlet Plant Model

Res. Time, s 25 25
Pressure, kPa 400 400
HCl/C H (Feed) 2 2
 
Reactor Outlet Error%
Outlet Temp., K 498 498.18 #0.04%
C H Conversion 99.3% 99.43% #0.13%
 
HCl Conversion 98.3% 98.55% #0.25% Fig. 2. The e!ect of residence time on C H conversion.
 

Fig. 3. E!ect of height at minimum #uidization on C H conversion.


 
Fig. 1. E!ect of C H mole fraction on conversion.
 

conversion, since it decreases the interfacial area of mass


conversions and EDC production rate remain constant and heat transfer between the bubble and dense phases.
while the ethylene conversion goes down because ethy- Fig. 3 shows the changes in the height at minimum
lene is no longer the limiting reactant. #uidization and the corresponding changes in the ethy-
lene conversion. The "gure also shows that small change
3.3. Ewect of residence time of height at minimum #uidization has a signi"cant e!ect
on ethylene conversion until the height reaches 6 m.
Fig. 2 shows the e!ect of residence time on the ethylene However, above 6 m height, there is no economic justi"-
conversion. As the residence time increases, the super"- cation for the extra capital investments on reactor vol-
cial velocity and the bubble size decrease and conse- ume and catalyst quantity.
quently C H conversion increases. It is clear from
 
Fig. 2 that the ethylene conversion increases asymp- 3.5. Ewect of bubble diameter
totically until it reaches a residence time of 20 s with
ethylene conversion of 0.972, then the conversion in- The bubble size has a signi"cant e!ect on the ethylene
creases slowly till the residence time of 40 s. At residence conversion. When the average bubble diameter (d ) is
times in excess of 40 s, the conversion approaches an 8 cm, an increase of bubble diameter by 50% will de-
equilibrium conversion of about 0.98. crease the ethylene conversion from 96.5 to 86.5 as shown
in Fig. 4. When the bubble diameter increases, the overall
3.4. Ewect of height at minimum yuidization mass transfer area per unit bubble volume between
bubble and dense phase decreases.
The bed height at minimum #uidization was varied It is very important to take care of the bubble size by
between 3 and 9 m at a constant super"cial velocity and choosing a proper design for the reactant distributor in
bubble diameter. The increase of height at minimum order to generate small bubbles. Furthermore, the reac-
#uidization at a constant velocity will increase the resi- tor must be operated at su$ciently low super"cial gas
dence time because an increased in bed height leads to an velocity. The growth of bubbles comes from their coales-
increase in catalyst volume. The bubble diameter was cence by one bubble catching up with another. Therefore,
kept constant at an average value which can be conduc- the bubbles coalescence may be reduced by "tting ba%es
ted through a proper distributor choice because a large inside the reactor to break up the bubbles and reduce
bubble diameter has a negative e!ect on the ethylene their sizes.
S. M. Al-Zahrani et al. / Chemical Engineering Science 56 (2001) 621}626 625

Fig. 5. E!ect of pressure on C H conversion.


Fig. 4. E!ect of bubble diameter on C H conversion.  
 

3.6. Ewect of total pressure

Increasing the total pressure from 200 to 400 kPa leads


to an increase of ethylene conversion from 95.4 to
97.57%. Further increase of the total pressure above
400 kPa has a slight e!ect on the ethylene conversion and
consequently EDC yield as shown in Fig. 5.
Pressure has a major control on density of gas. The
density of gas is important since it a!ects the minimum
#uidization, also it a!ects the bed voidage at minimum Fig. 6. E!ect of feed temperature on C H conversion and product
 
#uidization. Pressure has also an e!ect on the rate of temperature.
reaction, since the pressure is a variable parameter of
ethylene concentration and the increase of pressure will
increase the ethylene concentration, therefore, it will in-
crease the rate of reaction.

3.7. Ewect of feed temperature on reactor performance

Fig. 6 shows the e!ect of variation of feed temperature


on product temperature and ethylene conversion. The
e!ect of feed temperature has a little e!ect on conversion,
but has a large e!ect on product temperature. The feed
temperature also a!ects the di!usivities of components in
the gas mixture as shown. The di!usivity of each com-
ponent in the gas mixture increase as the feed temper-
ature increase. Furthermore, the di!usivities of the gas
Fig. 7. E!ect of cooling medium temperature on C H conversion and
component a!ect the mass transfer coe$cient. Each mass  
product temperature.
transfer coe$cient increases as the di!usivity increases.

3.8. Ewect of cooling medium temperature


4. Conclusions
Fig. 7 shows the e!ect of cooling medium temperature
on ethylene conversion and product temperature. It is A comprehensive reactor model that can be used to
clear from Fig. 7 that when the cooling medium temper- predict the performance of a #uidized-bed reactor for the
ature increases from 300 to 440 K, C H conversion ethylene oxychlorination to produce ethylene dichloride
 
increases from 0.955 to 0.985 while the product temper- was developed. The model was veri"ed by comparing
ature increases from 482 to 528 K. The cooling medium simulation with industrial data obtained from the litera-
temperature is a variable parameter of heat balance ture. The model predictions agree well with these indus-
equation and any increase of cooling medium temper- trial data. Ethylene and HCl conversions and reactor
ature will e!ect the heat removal term and the value of temperature were predicted with accuracy $2% in
the product temperature. a wide range of reaction conditions.
626 S. M. Al-Zahrani et al. / Chemical Engineering Science 56 (2001) 621}626

The results reveal that the ethylene feed composition o Density of the gas, kg/m
E
has a very profound e!ect on the system performance. The o Density of solids, kg/m
Q
parametric sensitivity analysis has shown that the system
performance is particularly sensitive to residence time,
bubble diameter and height at minimum #uidization. References
The optimum ethylene conversion (i.e., 98%) and EDC
yield of more than 98% at 98% HCl conversion can be Abshar, M. E. (1994). Bifurcation, Stability and Chaos in yuidized bed
achieved by working at a residence time of 25 s, height at catalytic reactors. Ph.D. thesis, Univ. of Salford, Salford, UK.
Adris, A. M. (1989). Steam reforming of methane, MS. thesis., Univ. of
minimum #uidization of 7 m and bubble diameter of Salford, Salford, UK.
4.5 cm. Aljodai, A. (1999). Modelling and bifurcation of 1,2 dichloroethane pro-
duction by ethylene oxychlorination in yuidized bed reactor. MS.
Notations thesis. King Saud University, Saudi Arabia.
A Cross sectional area of the bubble phase, m Bakshi, Y. M., Gelbshtein, A. I., Gelperin, E. I., Dmitrieva, M. P.,
@ Zyshin, A. G., & Snagovshii, Y. S. (1991). Study of the mechanism and
d Bubble diameter, m kinetics of additive oxychlorination of olexns'. V. Kinetic model of the
C Concentration of cupric chloride in the cata-
! reaction. Translated from Kinetica Kataliz, 32, 663}672.
lyst Carrubba, R. V. (1970). Kinetics of the oxychlorination of ethylene.
C Concentration of ethylene in gas phase, Industrial and Engineering Chemistry, Process Design and Develop-
# ment, 9, 414}419.
mol/m
Cavaterra, E. (1988). Catalysts to make Dichloroethane. Hydrocarbon
C Molar heat capacity of gas, kJ/kg mol K
NE Processing, 67, 63}67.
C Molar heat capacity of solid, kJ/kg mol K
NQ Dmitrieva, M. P., Bakshi, Y. M., & Gelbshtein, A. I. (1991). Investiga-
h Distance along bed height, m tion of mechanism and kinetics of additive oxychlorination of ole-
H Total bed height, m "ns. IV. In#uence of copper containing salt catalyst with c-Al O .
 
H Height at minimum #uidization, m Support on pinetic parameters of individual stages of reaction.
KD Translated from Kneticka Kataliz, 32, 74}80.
h Bed to cooling surface heat transfer coe$c-
U Elnashaie, S. S., Wagialla, K. M., & Helal, A. M. (1991). The use of
ient, kJ/m s K mathematical and computer models to explore the applicability of
H Interphase heat transfer coe$cient between #uidized bed technology for highly exothermic catalytic reactions.
@B II. Oxidative dehydrogenation of ethyl benzene to styrene. Math-
bubble and dense phase based on bubble
phase volume, kJ/m s K ematical and Computer Modeling, 15, 43}54.
Fengqiu, C., Yongrong, Y., Shunni, R., & Gatang, C. (1994). Studies on
K Interphase mass transfer coe$cient between
@B ethylene oxychlorination, II. Reaction mechanism and kinetics.
bubble and dense phase based on bubble Petrochemical Technology, 23, 421}425.
phase volume, 1/s Fryer, E., & Potter, Q. E. (1972). Bubble size variation in two-phase
k Chemical reaction rate constant, 1/s models of #uidized bed reactors. Powder technology, 6, 312}322.
P Keane, D. P., Stobaugh, R. B., & Townsend, P. L. (1973). Vinyl chloride.
K Adsorption equilibrium constant, m/mol
? Hydrocarbon Processing, 52, 99}104.
N Molar #ow rate of component i in bubble
G@ Markelo!, R. G. (1984). Convert oxychlorination from air to oxygen.
phase, kg mol/s Hydrocarbon Processing, 63, 91}94.
N Inlet molar #ow rate of component j in Nawroski, J. S., & Velez, E. S. (1983). Oxychlorination of ethylene. Applied
G@D Industrial Catalysis, 1 (pp. 239}273). New York: Academic Press.
bubble phase, kg mol/s
N Molar #ow rate of component i in dense Reich, P. (1976). Air or oxygen for VCM. Hydrocarbon Processing, 55,
GB 85}89.
phase, kg mol/s Smallwood, P. V., Stephenson, M. W., Newman, M. W., & Bunten, I. J.
N Inlet molar #ow rate of component i in dense
GBD (1987). Vinyl chloride polymers (pp. 241}262). New York: Wiley.
phase, kg mol/s SRI Report. (1998). Process Economic Program, Stanford Research
Q Volumetric #ow in bubble phase, m/s Institute, Menlo Park, CA. Ethylene and derivatives, Vol. 1.
@ Toor, F. D., & Calderbank, P. H. (1968). Proceedings of the tripartite
Q Volumetric #ow in dense phase, m/s
B chemical engineering conference. Montreal, Que.: London Institu-
r Rate for reaction, kg mol/s m tion of Chemical Engineers.
R Gas constant, kJ/kg mol K Ullmann's Encyclopedia of Industrial Chemistry, (1986). Vol. 6, (5th
Bubble phase temperature, K ed.). (pp. 263}271). New York: VCH.
@ Wachi, W., & Asai, Y. (1994). Kinetics of 1,2 Dichloroethane formation
Dense phase temperature, K
B from ethylene and cupric chloride. Industrial Engineering and Chem-
Feed gas temperature, K
D istry Research, 33, 259}264.
Cooling medium temperature, K
U Wagialla, K. M., Helal, A. M., & Elnashaie, S. S. (1991). The use of
*H Heat of reaction, kJ/kg mol
P mathematical and computer models to explore the applicability of
; Bubble velocity, m/s #uidized bed technology for highly exothermic catalytic reactions. I.
@ Oxidative dehydrogenation of butene. Mathematical and Computer
; Minimum #uidization velocity, m/s
KD Modeling, 15, 17}31.
Werther, J. (1980). Mathematical Modelling of #uidized bed reactors.
Greek letters International Chemical Engineering, 20, 4.
d Fraction of bed consisting of bubbles Wimer, W. E., & Feathers, R. E. (1976). Oxygen gives low cost VCM.
e Void fraction Hydrocarbon Processing, 55, 81}84.

You might also like