Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Definition
Robbery can be seen very simply as theft with force. The actual definition is
stated in the Theft Act 1968 S8(1) as:
Actus Reus:
1. The actual stealing (theft).
2. using threatening force immediately before or at the time of theft.
Mens Rea:
1. Mens Rea of theft. (Dishonestly, Intent to perm deprive).
2. intention or recklessness regarding using threatening force immediately
before or at the time of theft in order to steal.
1. Without the actual Theft there can not be Robbery - Case: R v Robinson
2. The moment there is all the elements of theft (with relevant force) there is robbery. - Case:
Corcoran V Anderton
- Force is where the defendants intention is to put the victim in fear of violence - B and R V DPP.
- Force does not have to be direct force on the victim. - Clouden (D used force on bag to steal it)
- There does not need to be a real threat but intention to cause fear - Bentham (Used fingers behind
jacket to make it look like a gun)
Threat can be on any person. It does not have to be the victim against theft.
- The act of stealing can be a continuing act; the jury can decide when the appropriation is complete.
- Hale (Force was taken place after the taking of the jewellery box however the court decided that
the theft was a continuing act and thus was robbery).