Professional Documents
Culture Documents
383
2009 BY QUINTESSENCE PUBLISHING CO, INC. PRINTING OF THIS DOCUMENT IS RESTRICTED TO PERSONAL USE ONLY. NO PART OF THIS ARTICLE
MAY BE REPRODUCED OR TRANSMITTED IN ANY FORM WITHOUT WRITTEN PERMISSION FROM THE PUBLISHER.
Uysal et al WORLD JOURNAL OF ORTHODONTICS
384
2009 BY QUINTESSENCE PUBLISHING CO, INC. PRINTING OF THIS DOCUMENT IS RESTRICTED TO PERSONAL USE ONLY. NO PART OF THIS ARTICLE
MAY BE REPRODUCED OR TRANSMITTED IN ANY FORM WITHOUT WRITTEN PERMISSION FROM THE PUBLISHER.
VOLUME 10, NUMBER 4, 2009 Uysal et al
Table 2 Descriptive statistic values of the chronological and dental age of patients
for investigated groups
Chronological age (y) Dental age (y)
Groups n Mean SD SE Min Max Mean SD SE Min Max
n = sample size; SD = standard deviation; SE = standard error; Min = minimum; Max = maximum.
385
2009 BY QUINTESSENCE PUBLISHING CO, INC. PRINTING OF THIS DOCUMENT IS RESTRICTED TO PERSONAL USE ONLY. NO PART OF THIS ARTICLE
MAY BE REPRODUCED OR TRANSMITTED IN ANY FORM WITHOUT WRITTEN PERMISSION FROM THE PUBLISHER.
Uysal et al WORLD JOURNAL OF ORTHODONTICS
Maxilla 11.41 2.92 0.41 11.34 2.80 0.39 NS 13.39 2.22 0.31 13.29 2.15 0.33 NS
Mandible 11.41 2.63 0.37 11.50 2.59 0.36 NS 13.28 1.74 0.25 13.25 1.80 0.25 NS
Table 4 Statistical comparison of the dental age (in years) in the two
studied groups
Maxilla Mandible
Groups n Mean SD SE P Mean SD SE P
386
2009 BY QUINTESSENCE PUBLISHING CO, INC. PRINTING OF THIS DOCUMENT IS RESTRICTED TO PERSONAL USE ONLY. NO PART OF THIS ARTICLE
MAY BE REPRODUCED OR TRANSMITTED IN ANY FORM WITHOUT WRITTEN PERMISSION FROM THE PUBLISHER.
VOLUME 10, NUMBER 4, 2009 Uysal et al
387
2009 BY QUINTESSENCE PUBLISHING CO, INC. PRINTING OF THIS DOCUMENT IS RESTRICTED TO PERSONAL USE ONLY. NO PART OF THIS ARTICLE
MAY BE REPRODUCED OR TRANSMITTED IN ANY FORM WITHOUT WRITTEN PERMISSION FROM THE PUBLISHER.
Uysal et al WORLD JOURNAL OF ORTHODONTICS
8. Chertkow S, Fatti P. The relationship between 22. Kullman L. Accuracy of two dental and one
tooth mineralization and early radiographic evi- skeletal age estimation method in Swedish ado-
dence of the ulnar sesamoid. Angle Orthod lescents. Forensic Sci Int 1995;75:225236.
1979;49:282288. 23. Melsen B, Wenzel A, Miletic T, Andreasen J,
9. Uysal T, Sari Z, Ramoglu SI, Basciftci FA. Rela- Vagn-Hansen PL, Terp S. Dental and skeletal
tionships between dental and skeletal maturity maturity in adoptive children: Assessments at
in Turkish subjects. Angle Orthod 2004;74: arrival and after one year in the admitting
657664. country. Ann Hum Biol 1986;13:153159.
10. Demirjian A, Goldstein H, Tanner JM. A new sys- 24. Nadler GL. Earlier dental maturation: Fact or
tem of dental age assessment. Hum Biol 1973; fiction? Angle Orthod 1998;68:535538.
45:211227. 25. Gleiser I, Hunt EE. The permanent mandibular
11. Garn SM, Lewis AB, Kerewsky RS. Genetic, nutri- first molar: Its calcification, eruption and decay.
tional, and maturational correlates of dental Am J Phys Anthropol 1955;13:253283.
development. J Dent Res 1965;44:228242. 26. Moorrees CFA, Fanning EA, Hunt EE Jr. Age vari-
12. Demirjian A. Dentition. In: Falkner F, Tanner JM ation of formation stages for ten permanent
(eds). Human Growth, vol 2. New York: Plenum teeth. J Dent Res 1963;42:14901502.
Publishers, 1978:413444. 27. Dhanjal KS, Bhardwaj MK, Liversidge HM.
13. Janson GRP, Martins DR, Tavano O, Dainesi EA. Reproducibility of radiographic stage assess-
Dental maturation in subjects with extreme ver- ment of third molars. Forensic Sci Int 2006;159
tical facial types. Eur J Orthod 1998;20:7378. (suppl 1):S7477.
14. Jamroz GMB, Kuijpers-Jagtman AM, vant Hof 28. Liversidge H, Speechly T, Hector MP. Dental
MA, Katsaros C. Dental maturation in short and maturity in British children: Are Demirjians
long facial types. Is there a difference? Angle standards applicable? Int J Paediatr Dent
Orthod 2006;76:768772. 1999;9:263269.
15. Nanda SK. Patterns of vertical growth in the 29. Hagg U, Matsson L. Dental maturity as an indi-
face. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 1988;93: cator of chronological age: The accuracy and
103116. precision of three methods. Eur J Orthod
16. Kiki A, Kilic N, Oktay H. Condylar asymmetry in 1985;7:2534.
bilateral posterior crossbite patients. Angle 30. Loevy HT, Goldberg AF. Shifts in tooth matura-
Orthod 2007;77:7781. tion patterns in non-French Canadian boys.
17. Sonnesen L, Bakke M, Solow B. Bite force in Int J Paediatr Dent 1999;9:105110.
pre-orthodontic children with unilateral cross- 31. Nystrom M, Ranta R, Kataja M, Silvola H. Com-
bite. Eur J Orthod 2001;23:741749. parisons of dental maturity between the rural
18. Hesse KL, Artun J, Joondeph DR, Kennedy DB. community of Kuhmo in northeastern Finland
Changes in condylar position and occlusion and the city of Helsinki. Community Dent Oral
associated with maxillary expansion for correc- Epidemiol 1988;16:215217.
tion of functional unilateral posterior crossbite. 32. Leurs IH, Wattel E, Aartman IH, Etty E, Prahl-
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 1997;111: Andersen B. Dental age in Dutch children. Eur J
410418. Orthod 2005;27:309314.
19. Gustafson G, Koch G. Age estimation up to 16 33. Proffit WR, Fields HW. Contemporary Orthodon-
years of age based on dental development. tics, ed 3. St Louis: Mosby, 2000.
Odontol Rev 1974;25:297306. 34. Garn SM, Lewis AB, Polacheck DL. Sibling simi-
20. Demirjian A, Goldstein H. New systems for den- larities in dental development. J Dent Res
tal maturity based on seven and four teeth. 1960;39:170175.
Ann Hum Biol 1976;3:411421.
21. Marks RG. Design of Research Projects. The
Basics of Biomedical Research Methodology.
New York: Van Nostrand Reinhold Company,
1985.
388
2009 BY QUINTESSENCE PUBLISHING CO, INC. PRINTING OF THIS DOCUMENT IS RESTRICTED TO PERSONAL USE ONLY. NO PART OF THIS ARTICLE
MAY BE REPRODUCED OR TRANSMITTED IN ANY FORM WITHOUT WRITTEN PERMISSION FROM THE PUBLISHER.