Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Table 4: C
ompatibility of KetaSpire PEEK with Skydrol LD-4
KetaSpire KetaSpire
KetaSpire KetaSpire KT-820 GF30 KT-880 GF30 KetaSpire
KT-820 NT KT-880 NT BG20 BG20 KT-880 CF30
Property Control Exposed Control Exposed Control Exposed Control Exposed Control Exposed
Tensile Strength, 96 94 96 96 165 165 186 185 238 241
MPa (kpsi) (13.9) (13.6) (13.9) (13.9) (23.9) (23.9) (27.0) (26.8) (34.6) (35.0)
Tensile Modulus, 3.73 3.78 3.83 3.85 10.8 10.9 11.2 11.3 23.9 23.8
GPa (kpsi) (541) (549) (556) (559) (1,570) (1,580) (1,630) (1,640) (3,470) (3,450)
Flexural Strength, 148 152 156 159 265 270 282 287 349 349
MPa (kpsi) (21.4) (22.0) (22.6) (23.0) (38.4) (39.2) (40.9) (41.6) (50.6) (50.6)
Flexural Modulus, 3.79 3.92 3.88 4.02 10.0 10.3 10.5 10.6 20.2 20.2
MPa (kpsi) (550) (569) (563) (583) (1,450) (1,490) (1,520) (1,540) (2,930) (2,930)
Chemical Resistance
no effect no effect no effect no effect no effect
Under Stress
Flexural properties were also evaluated in a similar Jet Fuel A/A-1 (ASTM D1655)
manner using injection-molded bars, 127 mm x 12.7 mm x
The compatibility of KetaSpire PEEK with jet fuel
3.2 mm (5 in. x 0.5 in. x 0.125 in.), and testing for strength
A/A-1 was verified using a commercial aircraft protocol.
and modulus according to ASTM D790.
Table 5 contains the results of the testing. All KetaSpire
Chemical resistance under stress was verified by clamping PEEK grades tested show no detrimental effects from
unannealed test bars, 127 mm x 12.7 mm x 3.2 mm exposure to jet fuel A/A-1 and can therefore be
(5in. x 0.5 in. x 0.125 in.) to a fixture having a 127mm considered compatible with jet fuel A/A-1.
(5in.) radius. The surface of the bars were swabbed with
Skydrol LD-4 hydraulic fluid. The application of the fluid Test Procedures
was repeated after one hour and again after two hours. Tensile properties were tested by immersing injection-
After 24 hours the test bars were visually inspected for molded ASTM D638 Type 1 test specimens in the jet fuel
breakage, cracking, or swelling. for 7 days at room temperature. After 7 days, the samples
were removed, rinsed with water, towel dried, conditioned
according to ASTM D618, then tested for tensile strength
and modulus using ASTM D638.
KetaSpire PEEK Environmental and Chemical Resistance | 3
Table 5: C
ompatibility of KetaSpire PEEK with Jet Fuel A/A-1
KetaSpire KetaSpire
KetaSpire KetaSpire KT-820 GF30 KT-880 GF30 KetaSpire
KT-820 NT KT-880 NT BG20 BG20 KT-880 CF30
Property Control Exposed Control Exposed Control Exposed Control Exposed Control Exposed
Tensile Strength, MPa 96 95 96 96 165 164 186 185 238 240
(kpsi) (13.9) (13.8) (13.9) (13.9) (23.9) (23.8) (27.0) (26.8) (34.6) (34.8)
Tensile Modulus, GPa 3.73 3.76 3.83 3.88 10.8 10.8 11.2 11.3 23.9 23.8
(kpsi) (541) (545) (556) (563) (1,570) (1,570) (1,630) (1,640) (3,470) (3,450)
Flexural Strength, MPa 148 150 156 159 265 271 282 285 349 347
(kpsi) (21.4) (21.8) (22.6) (23.0) (38.4) (39.3) (40.9) (41.3) (50.6) (50.4)
Flexural Modulus, MPa 3.79 3.89 3.88 4.01 10.0 10.2 10.5 10.6 20.2 20.1
(kpsi) (550) (564) (563) (582) (1,450) (1,480) (1,520) (1,540) (2,930) (2,920)
Chemical Resistance
no effect no effect no effect no effect no effect
Under Stress
KetaSpire PEEK Environmental and Chemical Resistance | 5
Test Procedures
Sterilization Resistance
To evaluate the compatibility of KetaSpire PEEK with
automotive brake fluid, a testing program utilizing Several grades of KetaSpire PEEK were tested for
Hydraulan 404 DOT 4 Brake Fluid was performed. Test compatibility with a variety of sterilization techniques. In all
bars conforming to the dimensions of ISO Test Method cases, the PEEK was exposed to multiple sterilizations or
527 were immersed in the fluid and the fluid was heated to higher levels of the sterilizing agent to verify compatibility
150C (302F). After 1,000 hours the fluid was cooled to for repeated use. The techniques investigated include
room temperature, bars were removed, toweled off, and gamma radiation, electron beam (E-beam), ethylene oxide,
tested for tensile properties using ISO test method 527, hydrogen peroxide gas plasma, and steam autoclaving.
for flexural properties by ISO test method 178, and for None of these techniques resulted in any serious loss of
impact by ISO test method 180. Bars were also weighed properties for any of the grades tested. KetaSpire PEEK
and measured. The data obtained was compared to that can be considered compatible with all of the common
obtained on samples that had not been immersed in the sterilization methods.
brake fluid. The fluid was then reheated to 150C (302F)
and the clock restarted. After 2,000 hours the fluid was Gamma Radiation
cooled again to room temperature and bars were removed Gamma Radiation is an effective low-temperature
for testing. The fluid was then reheated and held for an sterilizing method. Gamma processing is a highly reliable
additional 1,000 hours at which time the fluid was cooled procedure, that penetrates deep leaving no area with
and the remaining bars removed. uncertain sterility.
Motor Oil Gamma rays are emitted from radioactive materials
such as Cobalt 60 and Cesium 137. The product being
The compatibility of KetaSpire KT-820 NT PEEK to typical
sterilized is placed near the radiation source until the
automotive motor oil at 165C (329F) was evaluated by
required dose is absorbed.
immersion for 1,000 hours. The results, shown in Table 10,
indicate that the PEEK was not degraded by the exposure. Two grades of KetaSpire PEEK, KT-820 NT and KT-880
NT, were evaluated for gamma sterilization suitability.
Table 10: KetaSpire KT-820 NT in Motor Oil Injection molded samples were sent to a firm that
Hours
specializes in contract sterilization. Some samples were
exposed to gamma radiation until they adsorbed 20 kGy,
Property 0 500 1,000
and some until they adsorbed 40 kGy. The properties of
Tensile Strength 75 75 73 the exposed samples were measured and compared to
at Break, MPa (kpsi) (10.8) (10.8) (10.6)
unexposed samples. The results are shown in Table 11 for
Tensile Elongation the 40 kGy samples. Both grades show excellent property
32 17 15
at Break, %
retention. The Dynatup impact results suggest that KT-820
Flexural Strength, 116 124 127 NT would be a better choice for applications requiring
MPa (kpsi) (16.8) (18.0) (18.4)
gamma sterilization.
Flexural Modulus, 3.6 3.7 3.7
GPa (kpsi) (524) (535) (535)
Table 11: Property Retention After
Notched Charpy
23C (73F),
5.7 5.9 5.9 40 kGy Gamma Radiation Exposure
(2.7) (2.8) (2.8)
kJ/m2 (ft-lb/in2) KetaSpire KetaSpire
Notched Charpy
Property KT-820 NT KT-880 NT
6.0 6.4 5.4
-40C (-40F), Tensile Strength 98.5% 98.6%
(2.9) (3.0) (2.6)
kJ/m2 (ft-lb/in2)
Tensile Elongation at Break 101% 101%
Table 14: E
ffect of Hydrogen Peroxide Gas Plasma
KetaSpire KetaSpire KetaSpire
KT-880 NT KT-820 GF30 BG20 KT-880 CF30
Property 0 Cycles 200 Cycles 0 Cycles 200 Cycles 0 Cycles 200 Cycles
Tensile Strength, MPa (kpsi) 102 (14.8) 103 (14.9) 170 (24.7) 172 (24.9) 239 (34.7) 234 (33.9)
Tensile Modulus, GPa (kpsi) 3.9 (566) 3.9 (566) 10.7 (1,550) 10.8 (1,570) 25.2 (3,650) 24.5 (3,550)
Elongation at Break, % 19 16 3.0 3.0 1.6 1.6
Flexural Strength, MPa (kpsi) 154 (22.3) 158 (22.9) 269 (39) 272 (39.5) 346 (50.2) 329 (47.7)
Flexural Modulus, MPa (kpsi) 3.9 (566) 4.0 (580) 10.1 (1460) 10.4 (1,510) 20.3 (2,940) 21.5 (3,120)
Dynatup Impact
Max Load, N (lb) 6,420 (1,444) 6,134 (1,379) 1,390 (312) 1,530 (344) 1,680 (377) 1,710 (385)
Total Energy, J (ft-lb) 70 (52) 66 (49) 9.7 (7.2) 10 (7.4) 9.2 (6.8) 10 (7.4)
KetaSpire PEEK Environmental and Chemical Resistance | 7
Test Procedures rest between cycles. Every 10 cycles the samples were
wiped down with a lint free wipe moistened with deionized
Test samples conforming to ASTM D638 Type 1 and
water and allowed to dry before continuing.
plaques 100 mm x 100 mm x 3 mm (4 in. x 4 in. x 0.12in.)
were sterilized. The conditions for the ETO sterilization Samples were returned and mechanical property testing
were ETO concentration of 883 mg/L, temperature of was conducted in Solvays Test Labs in Alpharetta, GA.
55C (131F), exposure time of 60 minutes, relative Samples were conditioned according to ASTM D618 prior
humidity of 70%, and aeration time of 60 minutes. to testing. Tensile properties were tested according to
After the desired number of cycles, the samples were ASTM D638, flexural properties according to D790, and
removed, cooled to room temperature, and conditioned impact testing according to ASTM D3763.
according to ASTM D618. Tensile properties were
tested according to ASTM D638. The impact testing Steam Autoclaving
was done according to ASTM D3763. Steam autoclaving is a fast, reliable, and inexpensive
method of sterilizing. Table 15 shows the effects of
Low Temperature Hydrogen Peroxide steam autoclaving for 1,000 cycles on KetaSpire KT-820
Sterilization NT and KT-880 NT. Tensile strength, tensile modulus, and
Another alternative for low-temperature sterilization is impact resistance are not diminished by 1,000 cycles of
hydrogen peroxide gas. In this process a concentrated steam sterilization.
aqueous solution of hydrogen peroxide (H2O2) is vaporized
and injected into an evacuated chamber containing Table 15: Effect of Steam Sterilization
devices. This gas diffuses through the chamber exposing KetaSpire KetaSpire
all of the surfaces to be sterilized. After a final venting step, KT-820 NT KT-880 NT
devices are ready to use as no aeration is needed. Cycles
Three grades of KetaSpire PEEK were tested,
Property 0 1,000 0 1,000
unfilled KT-880 NT, glass fiber reinforced KT-880 Tensile Strength at Yield, 96 103 103 108
GF30, and carbon fiber reinforced KT-880 CF30. The MPa (kpsi) (14.0) (14.9) (15.0) (15.7)
results of the evaluation are summarized in Table 14. Elongation at Yield, % 5.5 4.8 6.0 5.1
None of the KetaSpire grades tested show any
degradation of properties after 200 cycles. The only Elongation at Break, % 15 13 14 16
change seen was in the color of the samples. For more Tensile Modulus, GPa 3.8 3.9 3.9 4.0
detailed information about this study, please visit (kpsi) (550) (565) (568) (580)
www.SolvaySpecialtyPolymers.com. Dynatup Impact
6,640 6,740 6,610 5,920
Test Procedures Max Load, N (lb)
(1,490) (1,560) (1,485) (1,330)
Injection molded tensile bars conforming to ASTM D638 Energy at max Load, 55 56 48 43
Type 1, bars 127 mm x 12.7 mm x 3.2 mm (5 in. x 0.5 J (ft-lb) (40) (41) (35) (31)
in. x 0.125 in.) conforming to ASTM D790, and plaques 76 76 66 63
100mm x 100 mm x 3 mm (4 i nch x 4 in. x 0.12 in.) of Total Energy, J (ft-lb)
(56) (56) (49) (46)
each grade were sent to an equipment manufacturer for
gas plasma sterilization
Test Procedures
Sterilization was performed via gas plasma hydrogen
peroxide sterilization in a STERRAD 100NX sterilization Injection molded tensile bars conforming to ASTM D638
system. The samples were placed on edge and separated Type 1 and plaques 100 mm x 100 mm x 3 mm (4 in.
to maximize sterilant exposure around each sample. x 4 in. x 0.12 in.) were subjected to steam autoclave
The prepared trays were then double wrapped with sterilization at the conditions shown in Table 16. Sample
polypropylene CSR wrap. The trays were placed on both were removed after 250, 500, and 1,000 sterilization
shelves of the STERRAD 100NX sterilization chamber cycles. Samples were conditioned according to ASTM
and processed using the standard cycle. D618 prior to testing. Tensile properties were tested
according to ASTM D638. The impact testing was
The test samples were processed for 25 cycles, 100cycles, done according to ASTM D3763.
and 200 cycles with approximately 30 minutes or longer
KetaSpire PEEK Environmental and Chemical Resistance | 9
Mechanical Properties KetaSpire KT-820 loses elongation at break with exposure
to weathering as shown in Figure 4. The elongation of the
KetaSpire KT-820 is a ductile polymer and specimens
fiber-reinforced grades is low prior to exposure because
tested for tensile strength prior to weathering exhibit
of the fiber reinforcement. Weathering does not result
a yield point before breaking. After weathering, most
in a loss of elongation for these grades. Like the tensile
specimens broke prior to yield indicating a loss of ductility.
strength, the majority of the drop occurs in the first
KetaSpire KT-880 GF30 and KT-880 CF30 are fiber-
1,000hours and then additional exposure does not result
reinforced grades and therefore dont have a yield point
in further degradation. The fiber reinforced grades show
before breaking. Figure 2 shows the change in tensile
no loss of elongation suggesting that the fibers may be
strength at break due to weathering. There is a reduction
shielding the polymer from the ultraviolet.
in strength due to exposure. The unfilled grades has the
greatest drop. In all cases, the majority of the reduction
occurs in the first 1,000 hours and additional exposure Figure 4:Tensile Elongation at Break
causes little additional loss of strength.
18
250
Tensile Strength at Break, MPa
35
30 2
200
25
150 1
20
KT-820
100 KT-880 GF30 15
KT-880 CF30
0 1,000 2,000 3,000 4,000 5,000 6,000 7,000 8,000
10
50
Exposure Time, hours
5
0 0
0 1,000 2,000 3,000 4,000 5,000 6,000 7,000 8,000 Conclusions
Exposure Time, hours
KetaSpire PEEK is affected by simulated weathering.
The primary effects are yellowing, loss of surface gloss,
The change in tensile modulus due to exposure to and a loss of ductility. Fiber-reinforced grades show much
ultraviolet radiation is shown in Figure 3. For the most part, lower loss of strength and elongation but do show the
the modulus is not affected by the exposure even up to cosmetic changes.
8,000 hours.
For applications that will be exposed to direct sunlight, it
Figure 3:Tensile Modulus is recommended that parts made of the unfilled grades
be painted or pigmented black. Parts made from the
25 fiber-reinforced grades may be painted if appearance
3,500
after weathering is a critical factor.
Tensile Modulus, kpsi
Tensile Modulus, GPa
3,000
20
KT-820
KT-880 GF30
2,500
15 KT-880 CF30
2,000
10 1,500
1,000
5
500
0 0
0 1,000 2,000 3,000 4,000 5,000 6,000 7,000 8,000
Exposure Time, hours
0.30
Since moisture is ubiquitous, knowledge of the effects of
moisture on the properties of a material is critical to the 0.25
design engineer trying to meet end use requirements.
Weight Change, %
While the mechanical properties of metals are essentially 0.20
unaffected by short-term exposure to water, the response
of plastics varies considerably depending on the polymer 0.15
0.15
The available data indicate that the design engineer does
not need to be concerned with water absorption when
0.10
designing with KetaSpire PEEK, even if the exposure is
at elevated temperatures. 0.05
0.00
0 1,000 2,000 3,000 4,000 5,000 6,000 7,000 8,000
Immersion Time, hours
KetaSpire PEEK Environmental and Chemical Resistance | 11
SOLVAY SPECIALTY POLYMERS
Technical Bulletin More Products with More Performance
www.SolvaySpecialtyPolymers.com
Contact Solvay Specialty Polymers
Europe, Middle East and Africa SpecialtyPolymers.EMEA@solvay.com
Americas SpecialtyPolymers.Americas@solvay.com
Asia and Australia SpecialtyPolymers.Asia@solvay.com
Material Safety Data Sheets (MSDS) are available by emailing us or contacting your sales representative. Always consult the appropriate MSDS
before using any of our products.
Neither Solvay Specialty Polymers nor any of its affiliates makes any warranty, express or implied, including merchantability or fitness for use, or
accepts any liability in connection with this product, related information or its use. Some applications of which Solvays products may be proposed
to be used are regulated or restricted by applicable laws and regulations or by national or international standards and in some cases by Solvays
recommendation, including applications of food/feed, water treatment, medical, pharmaceuticals, and personal care. Only products designated
as part of the Solviva family of biomaterials may be considered as candidates for use in implantable medical devices. The user alone must finally
determine suitability of any information or products for any contemplated use in compliance with applicable law, the manner of use and whether
any patents are infringed. The information and the products are for use by technically skilled persons at their own discretion and risk and does
not relate to the use of this product in combination with any other substance or any other process. This is not a license under any patent or other
proprietary right.
All trademarks and registered trademarks are property of the companies that comprise the Solvay Group or their respective owners.
G-50691 2012 Solvay Specialty Polymers USA, LLC. All rights reserved. D 04/2012 | R 12/2012 | Version 1.4