Professional Documents
Culture Documents
COPY
EIJ~~N
UivWtnn :::z.. ~: ur Court
Thin~ ;:-.~ '. ; is ion
31\.epulllir of tlJe ~~lJilipptne%
~rP 1 i1 20i6
~upreme QCourt
jfllln nil n
THIRD DIVISION
DECISION
PERALTA, J.:
The instant case seeks to reverse and set aside the Court of Appeals
1
(CA) Decision dated January 20, 2015 in CA-G.R. CR-I-IC No. 04913. The
CA upheld the Decision 2 of the Regional Trial Court (RTC) of Taguig City,
Branch 163, dated January 11, 2011 in Criminal Case No. 134985, which
found accused-appellants spouses Primo C. Ybafiez and Nila S. Ybanez (the
Spouses Ybanez), Mariz Q. Reyos, Michelle T. Huat guilty beyond
reasonable doubt of Qualified Trafficking in Persons under Section 6(a) and
(c), in relation to Sections 4(a) and 3, and penalized under Section 1O(a) and
(c) of Republic Act (R.A.) No. 9208, otherwise known as the Anti-
Trafficking in Persons Act of 2003.
Designated Additional Member in lieu of Associate Justice Francis H. Jardeleza, per Rafne dated
October 19,2015.
1
Penned by Associate Justice Melchor Q.C. Sadang, with Associate Justices Japar B. Dimaampao
and Franchito N. Diamante; concurring; rollo, pp. 2-15.
1
Penned by Judge Lei Ii Cruz Suarez; CA rollo, pp. 28-34.
oY
Decision -2- G.R. No. 220461
That on or about March 2005 until February 15, 2007 in the City of
Taguig, Metro Manila, the above-named accused PRIMO C. YBANEZ,
NILA S. YBANEZ, MARIZ Q. REYOS, MICHELLE T. HUAT, in
conspiracy with one another, and by means of deceit and taking advantage
of the vulnerability of the victims, and for the purpose of exploitation,
such as prostitution and other forms of sexual exploitation, but under the
pretext of domestic employment, did then and there wilfully, unlawfully
and knowingly RECRUIT, RECEIVE, HARBOR AND EMPLOY,
ANGELINE A. BONETE, KATE M. TURADO, VIRGIE C. ANTONIO
and JENNY S. POCO, as a prostitute in Kiray Bar and KTV Club
Restaurant under the pretext of being employed as GRO's (Guest
Relations Officer) to their damage and prejudice.
CONTRARY TO LA W. 3
When arraigned on May 21, 2007, the Spouses Ybanez, Reyos, and
Huat pleaded not guilty to the crime charged. Thus, trial ensued.
Id. at 28.
?
Decision - ,,
_) - G.R. No. 220461
sexual intercourse. Antonio was also given P300.00 for her work that night.
Thereafter, she would have intercourse with her other customers. Lastly,
Kate Turado narrated that she had been previously employed at a club near
Kiray. In March 2005, she left said club and transferred to I<iray upon Nila
and Huat's invitation. I<iray had a ground floor with a band and disco area,
and a second floor with two rooms. The Super VIP room was where
"gamitan" or sexual intercourse would take place, while the VIP room was
for "tyansing only." She was told that she would earn a commission of
P300.00 if a customer would bring her to the Super VIP room, Pl20.00 for
the VIP room, and P50.00 if she had ladies' drinks on the ground floor. The
customer must pay at the cashier if he wanted to have sex. Turado alleged
that Nila and Huat would tell them to agree to have sex even if they did not
like the customers. Each time that she was brought to the Super VIP room,
she would get a P300.00 commission, with or without intercourse. Aside
from being "tabled" by customers, she was also made to dance in
provocative outfits. After a series of tests and evaluation, Turado was found
to be functioning within the mildly retarded level and is not capable of
protecting herself.
NBI Forensic Chemist Loren Borines testified that she marked the six
PS00.00 bills used in the raid with invisible crayon and fluorescent powder.
Upon ultraviolet light examination, she noted the presence of fluorescent
specks and smudges on both hands of Reyos and Huat, similar to the ones
placed on the marked bills.
/
Decision -4- G.R. No. 220461
On the other hand, Nila denied the charges and asserted that Kiray
was engaged in a legitimate business. It was a business establishment where
live bands would perform and barangay tanods would hold meetings. IZiray
did not have private rooms and the VIP room had a glass door with no lock.
There was no prostitution or lewd shows in the bar and the employees were
prohibited by their rules to flirt or engage in any indecent activity with the
customers. Copies of said rules were also visibly posted on the ground and
second floors of the establishment. She said that on February 15, 2007, NBI
agents mTived at IZiray as customers. They asked to be transferred upstairs
and for two more women to join them. One of the agents asked Nila if he
could take a woman out. When Nila refused, the agent became angry and
banged the beer bottle on the table. She then saw her husband, Primo, being
arrested by the NBI. They were then brought. to the NBI Compound,
together with Reyos, 1-Iuat, Bonete, Antonio, and Turado.
On January 11, 2011, the RTC of Taguig City found the Spouses
Ybafiez, Reyos, and I-Iuat guilty of Qualified Trafficking in Persons under
Section 6(a) and (c), in relation to Sections 4(a) and 3, and sentenced them
to suffer the penalty of life imprisonment, and ordered them to each pay a
fine of IJ2,000,000.00, the costs, and the legal rate of interest, thus:
SO ORDERED. 4
SO ORDERED. 5
Id. at 34.
Rollo, p. 14. (Emphasis in the original)
/I
Decision -5- G.R. No. 220461
Even assuming that their main task was to serve as waitresses, the
evidence would show that Reyos and Huat did more than just serve food and
beverages to the customers. As Baso claimed, they even offered to bring
him and his team to the Super VIP room and they actually received the
amount paid for the "additional service."
Section 3(a), Republic Act No. 9208, Entitled An Act to Institute Policies to Eliminate Trafficking
in Persons Especially Women and Children, Establishing the Necessary Institutional Mechanisms for the
Therefore, the courts below aptly found that there was sufficient
evidence that accused-appellants were indeed engaged in the recruitment of
young women for the purpose of prostitution or sexual exploitation.
However, in view of the demise of accused-appellants Primo C. Ybafiez 8 and
Nila S. Ybafiez, 9 their names have been dropped as respondents in the
instant case pursuant to Article 89 of the Revised Penal Code.
Consequently, the case has been considered closed and terminated as to
10
I
t1em.
SO ORDERED.
WE CONCUR:
EREZ
Associate Justice
""
Associate Justice
ATTESTATION
I attest that the conclusions in the above Decision had beim reached in
consultation before the case was assigned to the writer of th
Court's Division.
CERTIFICATION
'-i~
_; , (~:t:rk of Court
T:",;":~ ~)~,.,ision
SEP 2 O 2016