Professional Documents
Culture Documents
DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION
REGION XI
Division of Davao del Sur
Santa Cruz South District
-oOo-
AGRIPINA ELEMENTARY SCHOOL
INDIVIDUAL PERFORMANCE COMMITMENT AND REVIEW FORM (for Teachers )
WEIGH ACTUA
TIME PERFORMANCE INDICATORS
MFO T PER TARGE L RATIN SCOR
KRAS OBJECTIVES FRAM (QUALITY, EFFICIENCY,
S KRA T RESULT G E
E TIMELINESS)
S
Proficient/Highly Proficient
(4) 85%-99% of the indicators
were rated
Proficient/Highly Proficient
(3) 70%-84% of the indicators
were rated
Proficient/Highly Proficient 3 5 1.00
(2) 69%-51% of the indicators
were rated
Proficient/Highly Proficient
(1) 50% of the indicators were
rated
Proficient/Highly Proficient.
3. Monitored attendance, diversity Attendance of all pupils was
appreciation, safe, positive and systematically monitored.
motivating environment, overall physical Attendance of 75% identified PARDOs
were monitored and followed-up.
atmosphere, cleanliness and orderliness
Behavior problems were handled
of classrooms including proper waste quickly with due respect to childrens
disposal. (8%) rights.
Gender sensitive opportunities for
learning were provided.
Safety, orderliness and cleanliness of
classroom, toilets and proper waste 3 5
disposal were maintained. 0.4
(5) when all indicators were met
(4) when 4 all indicators were met
(3) when 3 all indicators were met
(2) when 2 all indicators were met
(1) when 1 all indicators were met
Pupils/Students 1. Monitored, evaluated and maintained June to 30 % Formative, summative tests congruent
Outcomes pupils/students progress within the rating March to the lesson were being used.
period. (10%) Appropriate reinforcement/feedback to
learners behavior was provided.
Opportunity for learners to
demonstrate their learning was
provided.
Non-traditional authentic assessment 1 5 0.5
techniques was used when needed.
Assignment as reinforcement or
enrichment of the lesson was given.
(5) when all indicators were met
(4) when 4 all indicators were met
(3) when 3 all indicators were met
(2) when 2 all indicators were met
(1) when 1 all indicators were met
2. Conducted remediation/enrichment . (5) Remediation/Enrichment Program is
offered to 130% and above of students who
programs to 75% of the pupils/student
need it.
needing it. (3%) . (4) - Remediation/Enrichment Program is 3 5 0.15
offered to 115-129% of students who need it.
. (3) - Remediation/Enrichment Program is
offered to 100-114% of students who need it.
WEIGH ACTUA
TIME PERFORMANCE INDICATORS
MFO T PER TARGE L RATIN SCOR
KRAS OBJECTIVES FRAM (QUALITY, EFFICIENCY,
S KRA T RESULT G E
E TIMELINESS)
S
. (2) - Remediation/Enrichment Program is
offered to 51-
99% of students who need it.
. (1) - Remediation/Enrichment Program is
offered to
50and below of students who need it.
3. Attained the required General
Scholastic Average (GSA)/Mean
Percentage Score (MPS) and Reading
Proficiency level for every grade/year
level for every learning area. (15%)
. 75% of the pupils attained a GSA of . 5 30% and above over the targeted number 3 2 0.1
85%-89% (Proficient Level) of pupils/students.
. 4 15-29% over the targeted number of pupils
and students
. 3 100% of the targeted number of
pupils/students.
2 51-99% of the targeted number of
pupils/students.
. 1 50% and below of the targeted number of
pupils/students.
. 5 30% and above over the targeted number
of pupils/students.
. 75% of the Grade 3 pupils achieved
. 4 15-29% over the targeted number of pupils
81.76% MPS in NAT 6 and students.
. 3 100% of the targeted number of
pupils/students. 3 2 0.1
. 2 51-99% of the targeted number of
pupils/students.
. 1 50% and below of the targeted number of
pupils/students.
. 75% of the Grade 3 pupils achieved . 5 30% and above over the targeted number
of pupils/students.
81.76% MPS in NAT 3
. 4 15-29% over the targeted number of pupils
and students.
. 3 100% of the targeted number of
pupils/students.
. 2 51-99% of the targeted number of
pupils/students.
. 1 50% and below of the targeted number of
pupils/students.
. 75% of the pupils achieved instructional . 5 30% and above over the targeted number
of pupils/students.
level of reading proficiency (MT for
. 4 15-29% over the targeted number of pupils
Grades 1 & 2; English and Filipino for and students.
Grade 3) . 3 100% of the targeted number of
pupils/students. 3 3 0.15
. 2 51-99% of the targeted number of
pupils/students.
. 1 50% and below of the targeted number of
pupils/students.
4. Participated in to curricular/school Participation to Academic and Co-
activities within the rating period (2%) Curricular Competitions
a. National Level 5
b. Regional Level 4
c. Provincial Level 3 3 5 0.1
d. District Level 2
e. School Level - 1
MFO KRAS OBJECTIVES TIME WEIGH PERFORMANCE INDICATORS TARGE ACTUA RATIN SCOR
S FRAM T PER (QUALITY, EFFICIENCY, T L G E
E KRA TIMELINESS) RESULT
S
Community 1. Supported registration/participated in June to 15 % . (5) 60% and above of the targeted pupils and
teachers supported registration/attended to
Involvement non-government activities like BSP, GSP & March
BSP/GSP/RCYC activities
RCYC (50% of the total number of pupils . (4) 50%-59% of the targeted pupils and
in class) (2%) teachers supported registration/attended to
BSP/GSP/RCYC activities
. (3) 40%-49% of the targeted pupils and 4 5 0.1
teachers supported registration/attended to
BSP/GSP/RCYC activities
. (2) 30%-39% of the targeted pupils and
teachers supported registration/attended to
BSP/GSP/RCYC activities
. (1) below 30% of the targeted pupils and
teachers supported registration/attended to
BSP/GSP/RCYC activities
2. Conducted periodic PTA Homeroom PTA meetings to report
meetings/conferences to report learners learners, progress conducted at least once:
a. a month 5
progress. (5%)
b. in two months 4
c. in three months 3
d. in four months 2
3 5 0.25
e. in five months or more 1
3. Conducted home visits to 75% of the . (5) 30% and above over the targeted number
of pupils that need academic
parents of pupils needing academic
monitoring/identified PARDOs were visited
monitoring/identified PARDOs within the . (4) 15-29% over the targeted number of pupils
rating period. (5%) that need academic monitoring/identified
PARDOs were visited 3 5 0.25
. (3) 100-114% of the targeted number of
pupils that need academic monitoring/identified
PARDOs were visited
. (2) 51-99% of the targeted number of pupils
that need academic monitoring/identified
PARDOs were visited
4. Undertaken/initiated classroom . (5) 100% project accomplishment within the
target date with full documentation report
projects/events/activities with external
. (4) 85% - 99% project accomplishment within
funding or sponsorship within the target the target date with full documentation report
date. (Funding Requirement: Php 3,000 . (3) 70% - 84% project accomplishment within
and up) (3%) the target date with full documentation report
. (2) 69% - 51% project accomplishment within 4 5 0.15
the target date with full documentation report
. (1) 50% and below project accomplishment
within the target date with full documentation
report
Professional 1. Conducted problem/classroom-based June to 15 % Conducted problem/classroom based
Growth and Action Research at least one in a school March action research. Action research was
Development year. (2%) undertaken using the following steps:
a. preparation design
b. conducting the research
c. managing data
d. analyzing data
e. disseminating data
f. utilizing the results
. 5 All indicators were met without any
revision and submitted ahead of schedule
. 4 All indicators were met with minor revision 3 1 0.02
and submitted ahead of schedule
. 3 All indicators were met with minor revision
and
MFO KRAS OBJECTIVES TIME WEIGH PERFORMANCE INDICATORS TARGE ACTUA RATIN SCOR
S FRAM T PER (QUALITY, EFFICIENCY, T L G E
E KRA TIMELINESS) RESULT
S
submitted on schedule
. 2 All indicators were met with major revision
and submitted behind schedule
. 1 No indicators were met due to the absence
of the action research
2. Submitted oneself for Instructional . 5 30% and above over the targeted number
of instructional supervision conducted
Supervision at least 5 times in a school
. 4 15-29% over the targeted number of
year. (4%) instructional supervision conducted
. 3 100% of the targeted number of
instructional supervision conducted
. 2 51-99% of the targeted number of 3 1 0.04
instructional supervision conducted. 1 50%
and below of the targeted number of
instructional supervision conducted
3. Participated in to 75% . (5) 30% and above participation over the
targeted number of INSET/
INSET/trainings/seminars/workshops called
trainings/seminars/workshop
for. (2%) . (4) 15-29% participation over the targeted
number of INSET/ trainings/seminars/workshop
. (3) 100-114% participation over the targeted
number of INSET/trainings/seminars/workshop
. (2) 51-99% participation of the targeted
number of INSET /trainings/seminars/workshop 3 5 0.1
. (1) 50% and below participation over the
targeted number of
INSET/trainings/seminars/workshop
4. Received academic and co-curricular Academic and Co-Curricular Awards
awards. (2%) Received
a. National Level 5 3 4 0.08
b. Regional Level 4
c. Division Level 3
e. District Level 2
f. School Level 1
5. Produced and published creative . 5 Produced publication/creative work
published in
work/publication for LRMDS/school
National Circulation/DepEd Post/CSC
paper/division publication within the school Newsletters/LRMDS and similar
year. (1%) publications
. 4 Produced publication/creative work
published in 2 1 0.01
regional publications
. 3 Produced publication/creative work
published in
division publications
. 2 Produced publication/creative work
published in
school publications
. 1 Unpublished work produced
6. Punctuality/Attendance/Wearing of 5 incurred less than 4 days absent of the total
number of
Uniform (4%)
official days
. 4 incurred 5-8 days absent of the total number of
* Conformed with the official time of official days
attendance from Monday Friday . 3 incurred 9-12 days absent of the total 5 5 0.05
number of
* Normal Working Hours: (per class official days
program) . 2 incurred 13-16 days absent of the total
number of
official days
. 1 incurred more than 16 days absent of the total
number of
official days
MFO KRAS OBJECTIVES TIME WEIGH PERFORMANCE INDICATORS TARGE ACTUA RATIN SCOR
S FRAM T PER (QUALITY, EFFICIENCY, T L G E
E KRA TIMELINESS) RESULT
S
* Any officer or employee who is absent in . 5 incurred less than 4 times tardiness/
undertime of the total number of official days
the morning is considered to be tardy
. 4 incurred 4-6 times tardiness/undertime of
and the total number of official days
is subject to provision on Habitual . 3 incurred 7-10 times tardiness/ undertime of
Tardiness the total number of official days 5 5 0.05
. 2 incurred 11-15 times tardiness/ undertime
* Any officer or employee who is absent in
of the total number of official days
the afternoon is considered to have . 1 incurred more than 15 times
incurred undertime, subject to the tardiness/undertime of the total number of
official days
provisions on Undertime
* Participation in the Flag Raising/Lowering . 5 incurred not more than 4 days absences of
the total number of flag raising/lowering
Ceremony
ceremonies in a year
. 4 incurred 5-8 days absences of the total
number of flag raising/lowering ceremonies in a
year
. 3 incurred 9-12 days absences of the total 5 5 0.05
number of flag raising/lowering ceremonies in a
year
. 2 incurred 13-16 days absences of the total
number of flag raising/lowering ceremonies in a
year
. 1 incurred more than 16 days absences of
the total number of flag raising/lowering
ceremonies in a year
*Complied with the prescribed uniform . 5 incurred less than 4 times non-compliance
to the wearing of the prescribed uniform
from Monday Thursday (refer to DepEd
. 4 incurred 4-6 times non-compliance to the
Order) wearing of the prescribed uniform
. 3 incurred 7-10 times non-compliance to the
wearing of the prescribed uniform
. 2 incurred11-15 times non-compliance to the 5 5 0.05
wearing of the prescribed uniform
. 1 incurred more than 15 times non-
compliance to the wearing of the prescribed
uniform
Over-All Rating for Accomplishment
4.30
Descriptive Rating
VERY SATISFACTORY
Ratee : Rater :
VILMA F. GEMENTIZA
MARVI S. GUDIN
Teacher II OFFICER IN-
CHARGE
Approved:
ABDULPATTA U. KAMDON
Public Schools District Supervisor