Epigraph

Once again the constituents of this book are essays and articles that I
wrote on my blog called CAMIDRCS. Instead of leaving my ideas for my
blog I thought it would be sage to collect them and publish them into a
book which could stand as one of the reference materials for the
philosophy of amystology and this work is the manifestation of this
aspiration. I single handedly wrote and edited this document. The book
contains inscriptions which defend epistemological realism, rationalism,
objectivity, metaphysical naturalism/materialism, ethical self-
preservation, self-enhancement, self- sufficiency and self-existence;
which are the values of the philosophy of amystology. Furthermore, this
book attempts to disparage the antonyms of the values mentioned above
by showing their inconsistency, irrationality and contradictions;
encouraging the reader to look more closely to the inane ideologies that
he accepted without perlustration.

It encourages people to exercise their reason rather than their

emotions/bias and interests while examining concepts of epistemology,
metaphysics and ethics; assuring them that if they look close enough into
the antonyms of amystology they will discover the facetious and absurd
nature of the concepts presented; reason is the higher faculty of man
which differentiates him from other animals; hence, by considering the
arguments presented in this book against epistemological idealism,
intuitionism, subjectivism, metaphysical spiritualism/mysticism, and
ethical self-sacrifice, self-mortification, self-insufficiency, and self-
extinction. It is hoped that the reader will discern the fallacious nature of
these concepts by applying his reason and commonsense to lead him
away from the institutionalized and legalized system of madness called
idealism and spiritualism/mysticism towards the bright and righteous
route of realism and naturalism/materialism. This book is a work which
attempts to make this goal a reality by attempting to empower and make
individuals critical about all concepts and theories which do not fulfill the
criteria of being reasonable and demonstrable.
 Some quotations
Understanding nature is the beginning of all wisdom

Masterdom is coming

Omniscience entails omnipotence

All suffering is due to the ignorance of nature

Nature is absolute

There is no truth or solution outside nature

Supernaturalism is a legalized form of schizophrenia

 Contents
Chapter-1

In defense of realism

.Page -1-

Chapter-2

In defense of rationalism

.Page -14-

Chapter-3

In defense of objectivism

.Page-30-

Chapter-4

In defense of naturalism/materialism

.Page -35-

Chapter-5

In defense of ethical self-preservation

.Page-115-

In defense of ethical self-enhancement

.Page -128-

In defense of ethical self-sufficiency

.Page -139-

In defense of ethical self-existence

.Page -154-
Intentionally left blank
 Chapter-1

In defense of realism

1.1 Nave idealism

One of the surprising things I find when I go through some

encyclopedias is that I find the phrase nave realism in
reference to people like myself and others who attempt to
describe and define the world exactly how it appears by
following the third law of logic i.e. the law of identity which
states that observable objects in the real world are exactly
how they appear i.e. everything is what it is; there is no
treeness, stoneness, rockness, sweetness, bitterness, or
hotness there is just a tree, stone, rock, sweet, bitter, and hot
made up of atoms respectively; there should never be any
mystical digression by adding the suffix ness into our
adjectives This is extremely dangerous as a thought
process. How can there be a secondary quality called
treeness, stoneness, painness, bitterness or
happiness? There can only be a tree, stone, pain, bitter and
happy. Unfortunately, these idealistic and mystical
regressions are inculcated in our languages and lexicons
that it is becoming onerous to dispel altogether in our writing
and locution. These so called secondary qualities which are
supposed to be created by the mind do not exist because
they are created by the errors in our grammar. I would like to
turn the table around and litigate the idealist himself as nave
and accuse him of nave idealism. There are no secondary
qualities; idealists are the ones who are nave; and people
who explain the world exactly how it appears are called
sapient realists and you are invited to be one of them.

-1-
Now, secondary qualities stated by Locke are supposed to be
entities that do not exist in the outside world beyond the
observer; like happiness, hatred, love, beauty and so on; they
are supposed to be abstract; now you should take notice
that by stating such arguments we are knocking the door of
spirituality and mysticism; further on if these entities are
independently created by the mind; and do not exist in the
outside world; then why do we need senses to trigger these
feelings? Why does not the mind just spontaneously create
love, hatred and beauty without primary quality stimulation;
if these secondary qualities existed and were not errors in our
grammar and most importantly if the mind has a power of
spontaneous generation independently of primary qualities?
Secondary qualities are not independent but extensions of
primary qualities. Consider the following: Can you feel
hatred without something loathsome? Can you feel happy
without something blissful out there in the real world? Can
you feel love without observing something lovely? Can you
denominate something as beautiful without the figures,
dimension, and color which make up that very subject? Can
you be conscious without something stimulating; which
triggers your awareness? Therefore, these so called
secondary qualities are not secondary; but, primarybut we
have not noticed them as such.

I think it is the idealist who is naive and immature in his

cogitation and conclusion; attempting to assign mystical
notions to primary qualities; by distorting the nature of
objective reality at the stage of epistemology and finally
metaphysics. Idealism is an epistemological disaster and a
huge fallacy; how can we call some body nave; if he
observes the color of the ocean and calls it blue; or the color
-2-
of the eye of his fianc as blue; does he really have any
option but to submit himself to the dictums of primary
qualities and objective reality? Should he dream that the
color of the ocean or the color of the eyes his fianc is
blueness in order to be called sage? Should he convince
himself that he is not just conscious but a consciousness so
that he could join the ranks of the wise? Because we should
always remember that when we add the suffix ness to
adjectives or nouns we are attempting to create an
independent entity capable of spontaneity; free from
objective reality and when we place these entities under
scrutiny to discern whether they function independently
without the dictum of reality; they fail miserably. If we tested
whether the consciousness can be conscious without any
stimulation it fails; if we attempted whether someone can be
happy without a primary quality it fails; if we attempted to
create a memory without primary qualities it fails again.

People who observe reality for exactly for what it is are

astute and sensible; the man who calls an ocean blue is
functioning exactly how he ought to function; he is
translating the spectrum of light efficiently; he does not need
to call his perception blueness; he does not need to call
himself a consciousness as stated above but just conscious;
because his brain is a translator of information not a
generator of reality. You are not committing any crime by
describing the world exactly how you observe it; even if you
have defects in your design like color blindness; and other
sensory defects that you are born with or acquire later in life;
the most important thing to note is that you have no option;
but to imbibe primary qualitieswhich create your
understanding of the natural world.
-3-
Finally, the attempt to distort and mysticize objective reality
comes from errors in our grammar; this error will lead to the
creation of spirituality which fruitlessly attempts to detach
the essence of matter and mould it into some sort of mystical
dimension that no one could understand; because it doesnt
exist and most importantly because it is an errors in our
languages which leads to the creation of inane concepts like
idealism and spirituality; which deserve to be called nave;
they all attempt to denominate concepts like love, happiness,
consciousness, beauty and so on as abstract. They may sound
abstract but are not abstract at all! They are extensions of
primary qualities.

1.2 Testing realism against platonic forms, conceptualism,

nominalism, dualism, and idealism to discern efficacy

Amystology is very much comfortable with Aristotle's

position of universals in things rather than Platos
interpretation of universals before things. It rejects platonic
forms, conceptualism, nominalism, dualism, any form of
idealism; whether it is dogmatic or transcendental idealism as
well as Locke's secondary qualities. It advocates the
materialistic view of the mind in summa; as was defended by
Democritus and Professor David arm strong. Most writers
like to call this form of realism as moderate realism or
scientific realism; but, we I just call it realism; because, there
is nothing moderate about reality; percepts create concepts
end of story. Thus, what epistemological realism states is that
objects or percepts ontologically exist independent of the
observer; notwithstanding his interests, moods, bias, or

-4-
intentions; so basically realism asserts the mind independent
existence of reality; outside the observer; in a fashion that
percepts create perceptions eventually leading to
conceptions; where these conceptions themselves are
material information and data in our minds; rather than some
sort of abstract, non-spatial, spirits as naively proposed by
idealists, and dualists.

Therefore, in amystology both percepts and concepts are both

material; there is no conflict and distinction; where the
outside world is denominated as material; whereas, abstract
concepts like beauty, justice, love, happiness, wrath,
aspirations, and so on are denominated as non-material. The
evidence for proving that the so called abstract entities or
'phenomena' which are studied under phenomenology are
material; is the effect of material drugs like lithium,
amphetamines, LSD, alcohol, as well as hormones like
serotonin and dopamine on mood and human behavior.

Now, let us test the idea of platonic forms; Plato paints a

mystical view of epistemology where universals exist in their
own right, prior to and independently of their instantiation by
sensible particulars; which is an absurdity! I believe Plato is
forwarding a form of mysticism where universals are not
either ideas or objects; Plato has a mystical and mysterious
interpretation and presentation of epistemology; where, what
he calls forms are not either ideas or sensible particulars; they
exist beyond our senses accessible only to the
"philosophically schooled intellects." If these concepts are
not either ideas or sensible particulars; then they are non-
entities; to rebuff his concepts of forms we just need to
realize that the so called abstract objects like beauty and
-5-
justice are the representatives of objective reality in our
consciousness viz. dimensions, curves, colors, harmony,
odor, and locomotion; that, we observe in external reality.
They are not some sort of mysterious entities which are not
either ideas or sensible particulars inaccessible to our senses;
how can entities be inaccessible to laymen but to schooled
intellects notwithstanding similar perceptual organs and
capability of apprehension? Any man is capable of cognition
if he is given the chance to do so.

Conceptualists reject the existence of universals in objective

reality; they assert that universals and abstracts exist only in
the mind not in external reality; furthermore, this philosophy
states as insane as it sounds; that, there is no reality
independent of our conception of it; the mind is not a passive
template of experiences but a creator of experiences. Now,
let us put this theory into a test, can anyone create a utopian
world just by invoking his mind to create a better world? If
this is the case why haven't conceptualist created a better
world just by conceptualizing and dreaming a utopian earth
free from Darwinian brutalism?

When we come to nominalism; it states that abstract

concepts, general terms or particulars have no independent
existence but only exist as names. In other words it is a
doctrine which states that general or abstract words do not
stand for objectively existing entities. Now if this is so where
did the general or abstract words to designate objectively
existing entities come from? If general terms or abstracts do
not represent objective reality then what do they represent?
How did they come about in our minds in the first place if
they are not representative of objective reality? As it can be
-6-
noticed nominalism presents the opposite position of
conceptualism; where nominalism rejects the existence of
universals and abstracts; for individual particulars that alone
exist objectively; whereas, conceptualism rejects the
existence of universals in objective reality asserting that
abstracts and universals only exist in our minds. To clear the
confusion created by platonic forms, conceptualism, and
nominalism; it must be stated that Universals like "dog" and
abstract concepts like "beauty" exist in objective reality as
well as representative concepts of objective reality in our
minds.

Dualism is a doctrine which states that mental phenomena

are non-material; or that the mind and body are not identical.
Dualism is related with the French philosopher Rene
Descartes who holds that the mind is non-physical and
therefore non-spatial; so, according to Descartes the
consciousness i.e. the mind is a non-spatial entity which
operates in a spatial space-time fabric; which is an absurdity!
How can there be a non-spatial consciousness in a spatial
universe? If the mental and the physical are distinct entities;
why does happiness (mental state) be created by physical
objects like money? If the mental was distinct non-spatial,
non-material entity; why does then the feeling of disgust
(mental state) be created by material objects like gruesome
scenes in a movie? If the mental and the physical are two
different entities? Why does the odor of fine coffee (physical
state) create a strong desire (mental state) to have a
cappuccino? In short why do physical states create mental
states? Unless the mental and the physical have an
interaction; and "interaction" could only be possible if the
objects are compatible as well as one and of the same kind.
-7-
Therefore, substance dualism does not make any sense at all;
it does not survive rational inspection.

The concept of idealism; which asserts that reality is

fundamentally mental or immaterial; it even goes further in
to asserting that all entities are composed of spirits. If ideas
or thoughts make fundamental reality then why not create a
utopian world through the so called "law of attraction"
(which is a branch of idealistic theory) or through
biocentrism or through spiritualism by invoking the
consciousness /mind/spirit as idealist like to denominate the
material mind albeit the piles of evidence to suggest that the
consciousness came into being after the big bang and
creation of our universe; idealists like to place the
consciousness before the big bang; as if nothing or (virtual
particles) need to be conscious to create a universe. Idealism
it does not matter whether; it is Berkleys subjective idealism
or Kants transcendental idealism or Platos objective
idealism; they all do not survive realistic and rational
criticism.

Locke's secondary qualities imply that the mind somehow

imposes secondary attributes on primary objects
independently; first of all the mind is an interpreter of reality
not a creator of realityan apples redness emanates from
the apple; because the apple is red; there will not be any
redness if there was no red apple in the first place;
furthermore, a feeling of hunger is created by the apple or by
low blood sugar not by the mind independently; hence, the
mental is created by the physical. In other word any attempt
to place the mind before matter; concepts before percepts;
subjects before objects is dismissed by amystology.
-8-
Amystology does not reject mental qualities like desire,
sweetness, bitterness, happiness, anger, fear, love; but states
that they are totally created and are dependent on objective
reality. They are either the creation or interpretation of
objective reality. For instance, let us consider that someone
has caught a terrible cold disorienting his tasting capabilities;
then, that does not mean that a fruit is not sweet anymore;
sweetness exists in the fruit. In short the mind is the
interpreter and dependent organ on reality not a creator and
independent organ; love cannot exist without something
lovely out there; hate cannot exist independently without
something abhorable; bitterness cannot exist without
something bitter out there; beauty cannot exist without
something beautiful out there; possessing dimensions, and
colors composed in harmony; fear cannot exist without
something fearful out there; justice cannot exist without
something just out there; for instance if you buy a book at a
fair cost then that is just; thus, mental qualities are not some
mysterious concepts imposed by the mind; but
representatives of objective reality or the creations of
objective reality.

Therefore, we need to be very careful in epistemological

outlook not to fall into confusion; universals and abstract
concepts exist both in objective reality as well as
representatives of external reality in our minds. It is critical
not to follow our passion but our reason; when, it comes to
philosophical issues; people who are biased and follow their
passions are called dogmatic; whereas, people who follow
reason and evidence are people of commonsense. As a
reminder to the reader; I would like to state that when I came
up with amystology as a philosophy, my main objective was
-9-
to encourage people to embrace evidence based concepts or
theories; whether, it is in epistemology, metaphysics or
ethics. Hence, amystology will be amended as time goes on
consecutively in upcoming versions if evidence suggests that
there are other efficacious forms of acquiring knowledge
(epistemology), dimensions (metaphysics) or virtues (ethical
values) other than the present eight chapters which make it
up. Thus, amystology is corrigible; if you think any of its
chapters are inconsistent with reason, reality and evidence;
then you are more than welcome to point them out for
corrigibility.

1.3 The Dialogue-III

Q: Do you have a religion?

No, I do not have a religion. Religion is a branch of idealism.

I do not think that my mind is a spirit because I know that
my mind is material. It is electricity made up of electrons
because I can see it on an EEG monitor and record its
frequency. I can literally measure my consciousness. The
consciousness is not a mystery. It is through electrons that I
store and make memories similar with a computer.

Q: Do you think it is necessary that people should believe?

Absolutely not! The overall concept of having a belief comes

from idealism. Your beliefs can never influence the outcomes
of objective reality. It is only natural understanding that can
influence and manipulate nature. Amazingly there are people
who still believe that the earth is flat; in a hope that when

- 10 -
they open their eyes they will discover a flat earth. They want
to show a brave face for the world in a time where their
defunct theories that they inherited from ancient shepherds
have been already dead and buried.

Q: Okay, What about ethics and morality a society needs

regulation in order to function and not to descend into
nihilism. What is your proposal?

All legal, moral and ethical issues are debatable. This

includes political systems, economical systems and social
systems i.e. cultures, norms, social codes, ethics and
morality. These regulations must be up for discussion by the
individuals who make up the society in a referendum to
promulgate or rescind what they think is in alignment with
their interest and their wellbeing. What is not debatable is the
issue of epistemology and metaphysics.

Q: So you are saying that all systems of idealism as you

like to call them are futile? Some people think you are
arrogantly realistic?

I do not have an option but to be arrogantly realistic; because,

that is what my nature dictates as a material animal; any
digression from materialism is bane and yes, I do not just
think they are futile but extremely dangerous because they
derail people from reality. They are cults of obscurancy and
thralldom. They do not want you to be inquisitive, empower
yourself, choose what is best for your interest and reach your
maximum potential. They are created by people who are
obsessed with the font size of their names and the modulus of
their subjects to their dreams rather than the success and
triumph of humanity.
- 11 -
Q: But you cannot prove the non-existence of all claims
made by idealists and mystics. So how could you possibly be
right?

First of all we should always be very careful not to fall in the

traps of semantics and word tricks. I cannot even prove the
existence of immaterial objects even if they were right in
front of my face due the issue of ammactivity [1]. Can you
prove the non-existence of vampires? Can you prove the non-
existence of fairies? Can you prove the non-existence of
unicorns? Can you prove the non-existence of ghosts? We
cannot even prove the existence of these things let alone their
non-existence. All are fictive! I think most people fall for
these types of word tricks. They do not understand their
design and what they are capable of comprehending. These
types of tricks hinder the rational mind and make it a subject
for cult leaders. But if people look closely and analyze them
carefully they will find them to be full of fallacies.

Q: Some people say that even if idealism is bogus it gives

them meaning and emotional stability. So why do you want
to eliminate a system that makes people stable?

True meaning only comes from truth. Placebos do not work

but fool people that they work. Where, in fact their illness
spreads its root in their frames. It is the same thing with
idealism and spiritualism. It may console people by its
descants and opulent visage to condone the fact that they are
in a drowning ship by forcing them to stare into space rather
than to the ground to admire the beauty of night stars and just
admit death. Which is more dangerous than beneficial;
people must figure out how to save their ship from drowning

- 12 -
by rational means; their ship is earth and the passengers are
all sentient beings rather than fool themselves that the world
is a blissful gift from a higher being which will be revealed
after death. We need to figure out how to survive a natural
calamity and dying star by getting our metaphysics right and
strengthening our technology to usher in longevity and even
immortality to the triumph of humanity in nature. There is no
meaning is death. Life after death is the bestselling
subterfuge of all times. If you fall for this trick you will fall
for anything.

Q: How do you know that there is no after life?

First of all I will ignore the naivety of your question but I

will answer it by saying that the reality of all extant entities
are measured by mans observation and understanding. If you
cannot observe then you can never know. How can a dead
man with a decomposing brain observe life after death?

Q: So you are saying that whether we like it or not nature is

the only dimension? And there is no escaping through it and
a need to believe in anything; but, there is a need to
understand nature in order to make people happy?

Absolutely!

Q: Any last remarks?

I am nature. Hence, I am.

[1] Ammactivity in amystology defines a phenomenon where an immaterial object

as long as it is immaterial can never interact with a material object; hence, can
never be known.

- 13 -
 Chapter 2

In defense of rationalism

1.1 Reason phobia

What makes people despise the idea of rationality? What

makes them detest the concept of mathematics, calculus and
physics which are inundated by formulas and solutions? Why
do people hate to think rationally and embrace realism? I
conjecture that there are three thingsfirst it may be the
incompleteness of natural science; second fear of the
unknown; third ignorance about the origins of the
mythologies and customs that these people hold with a death
grip and defend rabidly.

First, natural science as a study of nature is not complete; as I

said elsewhere we are ignorant more than 90% of the
universe and who knows what lies in the multiverse? The
natural philosophy at the time of Thales, Empedocles,
Democritus and Aristotle was very young there was no
periodic table, vacuum pumps, potent microscopes and
telescopes, detail map and topography of the planet, and so
forth. At the time of Thales people cannot explain simple
natural phenomenon like the revolution of the earth, diseases,
and thunderstorms naturally detached from mythology. The
gap of intelgnos (natural understanding) was tremendous
they explained the world with stories of mythologies (see
Greek and Roman mythology for details) man is naturally
curious which is a good thing; but unfortunately he tends to
be semi-rational; who finds it easier to lean towards
mysticism rather than rationalism in his explanations. This
gap in our understanding of nature is getting smaller and
- 14 -
smaller every decade, century and millennia as time moves
forward; which is a great achievement for mankind. But in
the meantime the gaps of intelagnos (natural ignorance) had
to be filled with several myths; like for example the
revolution of planets; was thought to occur due to the fact
that earth floated on water; was controlled by invisible
angels, was carried on a tortoise and other ridiculous
concepts; until the concept of gravity came around and
buried all superstition and mythologies. Today in the 21st
century we have several slots which demand natural
understanding; until then the idealists and mystics will have
their moment of speculation and fabrication until the
discovery and verification by realist and materialists; but rest
assured that as time progresses forward science will be
complete and will give us total understanding of nature
including the theory of everything. Therefore, we need to
defend natural philosophy from reactionaries which are
idealist and mystics.

The second issue is the fear of the unknown; fear is a very

powerful emotion; which can paralyses rational thinking to
follow whatever is available and seems acceptable; but when
the fear subsides and when we assess our previous decision
in a calm manner we see the fallacy and contradictions in our
decisions; fear of the unknown leads to unverified beliefs
which lead to tenacity and arrogance; which will be finally
called faith. Fear of the unknown will be cleared gradually
like a dark cloud in the sky; by the sun which can be
analogized with natural understanding; natural
understanding will dissipate the darkness that engulfs the
human intellect and culture; unverified beliefs which evolve
out of fear are super dangerous; if the members of the death
- 15 -
cult ISIS in the Middle east knew what they are following
and asserting with tenacity is a collection of plagiary form
Aristotles metaphysics, the epic of Gilgamesh and the Bible;
compiled into one mythological system called Islam by a
knave impostor called Muhammadthen they wouldnt
have done what they are doing to their fellow humans and
sentient creatures; today fear has driven people to embrace
all types of unverified beliefs notwithstanding the progress
made by natural philosophy in encrypting our origin and
surroundings; the 21st century man is more idiotic today,
than the peasants of the iron age; people are not empowering
themselves by wisdom either due to instability, economic,
social conditions, personal indolence, political
challenges/dictatorships and other myriad issues conspire
against their empowerment and gain of wisdom; I think this
is what is causing all the madness due to terrorism and faith
based violence. The 21st century man is more or less a tabula
rasa just like he was born. If people are having a hard time
distinguishing between ancient mythology and todays natural
facts then; they are either afraid of the unknown or witless
this witlessness leads to rabidity, tumult and darkness.

The third issue is witlessness about ancient mythologies

which are grandparents of todays mythology like Islam and
Christianity and other several branches of the tree called
fiction. As I mentioned in the second paragraph ancient
Sumerian and Mesopotamian myths are the roots where the
branches of Christianity and Islam have budded from. If you
go back in history you will recover the evidence for todays
belief systems; which our current day mystics defend rabidly
with canines; I recommend a very good book about the
origins of mythologies The magic of reality by Prof.
- 16 -
Dawkins to know about the several mythologies throughout
cultures and human history. In addition, you can study the
religions of ancient middle east to discern where your
fictional faith came from; see ancient Sumerian religion
compare and contrast the borrowed and stolen concepts
from these early mythologies like flood myths into your
current faith systems; then you will probably thank me for
defending natural philosophy and liberating you from the
fetters of mysticism rather than explode in paroxysm and
contempt.

Hence, science will eventually be complete, fear caused by

the incompleteness of natural science will subside gradually
when our knowledge of nature augments in a fabian manner;
and the mythologies which occupy the unknown slot of the
natural world and phenomena temporarilywill be
discarded to be replaced by natural facts and understanding.
In short, the incompleteness of science brings about fear and
fear brings about the embrace of unverified concepts blindly
and faith brings about extinction.

1.2 Testing rationalism against intuitionism

In a simple language rationalism stresses the indispensability

of reason as the chief source of knowledge; sometimes even
more significantly than empiricism but as equally equivalent.
Both rationalism and empiricism are valid; but rational
knowledge acquired through logic and math are more
accurate than empirical information; for example, the sun
might appear smaller than earth to a viewer on earth and thus
he might reach an erroneous conclusion that the sun is a
- 17 -
small radiant object in space. Thus, illusion and distorted
perceptions as employed by magicians may sometimes lead
to erroneous conclusion; using logic and math to calculate
the veracity of empirical data will help in rectifying illusions
acquired form empirical data; like the appearance of the sun
from earth. Therefore, rationalism as an epistemological
concept does not require physical measurements to reach into
a conclusion it uses logic and mathematics to reach a
conclusion for example we can use or the
Pythagorean theorem to deduce the relationship between the
sides of a triangle; where the variables in the equation have a
balanced relationship; where figuring out one can help us in
figuring out the other indirectly. This method is usually used
by astronomers to study planets and stars which are million
light years away by indirect means without being there; the
mass of earth, the mass of the sun, the diameter of earth, and
so on are studied indirectly by utilizing equations and
formulas rather than physical presence. Therefore,
rationalism is the most accurate and reliable source of
knowledge whereas, the so called intuition is an invalid term
let alone to be a source of knowledge.

Rationalism is an epistemological concept which gave

mankind an immense volume of information about our
universe as stated in the introduction; astronomers,
paleontologists and others use rationalism to measure the
diameter of our planet; the mass of our star, the size of our
cosmos and so on without physically measuring them just by
using indirect methods and equations for example the mass
of our planet is calculated without using gigantic weighing
machines using Newtons Law of gravity F= where, F

- 18 -
is the gravitational force, G is a constant of proportionality
6.67 x / ( kg/ ) m and M are the two masses
(earth and the sun) exerting the forces, and r is the distance
between the two objects. In addition, another formula is also
necessary in this calculation; which is Newtons second law
of motion F= ma, where F is the force applied to an object; m
is the mass of the object being accelerated and a is its
acceleration due to the force. Finally, you will get a result by
combining these formulas to be

In another example we can date the age of ancient fossils by

using either relative dating or absolute dating. These fossils
do not need birth certificates to possess a specific age; we
can indirectly analyze their age rationally and using logical
approaches. In relative dating the fossil is compared to
another object where the age is known like for example
comparing the fossil with the rock; where, it (the fossil) was
found. In absolute dating radiometric data are used to analyze
fossils; because chemical elements have isotopes which
break down at a constant rate over time through radioactive
decay; hence this constant rate of decay can be measured to
recover time and age.

Intuitionism is not even an organ of perception; it is a

mysterious non-entity like Plato's forms; if we ask what is
intuition most intuitionist say it is just a hunch or a feeling. If
we further ask how intuition works in acquiring knowledge?
We are told by mystics that it is a mystery known only to
elders and the chosen ones despite we possess the same
senses and mental aptitude as they do; hence we must ask can
an intuition be used to measure the mass of earth or the date
of a fossil which is millions years old? Can we detect the
- 19 -
rotundity of planet earth by intuition? If so why didnt the
ancient mystics inscribe it in their so called holy literature
that they say was acquired by intuition from some
unknowable dimensions of space-time? Why didnt we learn
the veracity of evolution and the existence of several fossils
which occupy the crust of our planet from the Bible and other
mystical literatures if intuition was really an accurate means
of acquiring knowledge? These facts are not just missing
from the diaries of intuitionists but misrepresented stating
that geocentrism is a fact; man is not an ape and so forth. The
fact that all these facts about nature are missing in mystical
literatures is one thing but being misrepresented is another
and nullifies intuition as a valid source of knowledge. If
intuition was a valid means of knowledge as mystics state
why cant we figure out the solutions to our most stubborn
solutions like environmental pollution, ailments, interstellar
travel and so forth just by our whim and caprice rather than
logic and rational equations?

Therefore, it is clearly evident that rationalism is a valid and

most important form of acquiring knowledge than intuition
which gave us so much understanding of our cosmos;
because, clearly intuition is just another term invented by
ancient mystics which is an invisible organ with an invisible
result on the ground.

1.3 A call to pure reason

I personally think that there is nothing impossible in the

natural world as long as you have the right formula or in
ancient mystical terminology the right spell to accomplish
- 20 -
it. The problem lies with mans capability and ingenuity in
producing this formula. In ancient time witches and sorcerers
as primordial scientists attempted to manipulate nature by
their potions, concoctions, trepanations, and spells. This
crude and irrational manner of engaging with nature has been
refined today in the modern world to include check and
balances, mathematics, peer review and other methods to
make our approach in engaging nature and the material world
effective.

The natural world is fascinating but complicated. The job of

unraveling this intricacy is achieved by rationalism. I have
called rationalism the forbidding mountain that no one likes
to climb especially idealists and mystics even though all
rewards await anyone who can accomplish the journey. The
people who chicken out are called idealist and super
naturalists whereas; the people who accomplish are called
realists and naturalists.

World leaders trouble themselves with the never ending

questions of solutions for world hunger, violence, climate
change, ethics and morality, as well as epidemics and
ailments. Now, we must inquire the questions whether food
aid can solve world hunger? Can more militarization and
security which violates peoples privacy solve the threat of
violence and terrorism on the planet? Can cascades of
seminars one after the other solve climate change? Can
spiritual or secular scriptures or documents solve morality
issues contradicting the natural coding of human nature? Can
pandemonium and wailing before empty space solve
epidemics and pestilence? We must understand that all these
approaches are wrong and are attempts to run away from the
- 21 -
fording mountain. All that we ever wanted lies at the top of
this mountain we just need to have the fortitude to climb it.

Once, man digresses away from rationalism he establishes

societies, states, and mysticism to compensate for the deficit
of pure reason that would have made him self-sufficient; he
diverts in behavior to become obscurant to anyone who
wants to the climb the mountain, by being totalitarian, and a
sadist as well as death loving mad man. Pure reason has been
pointed out as a solution for mans problems it is up to us to
embrace it to reach masterdom or digress from it to live in a
world of limitations and unhappiness in a society. The worst
enemies of pure reason are mysticism, idealism, dualism,
statism, and etc. In mysticism, idealism and dualism man is
herded away from the mountain and is forced to be totally
detached from reality. In statism or socialism instead of
eliminating his weakness man is forced by the state to
depend on other equally weak members of the society to
compensate for his limitations that he is incapable of
eradicating by climbing the forbidding mountain to develop
effective technologies.

People inquire how in the world they would solve their issues
like polluted environment and other issues just by pure
reason, a blackboard and a chalk? We as rational people must
answerdevelop a technique to degrade plastics and
neutralize nuclear waste using your black board. They might
continue their criticism by asking: how can I solve global
violence? Develop creatures that are not naturally coded to
be violent in the first place. How do I solve world hunger?
Develop a replicator. How do I cure global diseases?
Develop the molecule responsible as a remedy. As a bottom
- 22 -
line I would say: dont run away from pure reason and the
blackboardbecause you will never be able to find any
solution outside it and you will be compelled to return.

I challenge any one on the planet even in history to come up

with a genuine and permanent solution than pure reason, the
blackboard and the formula that they yield. Nobody can step
up to this challenge with a genuine and permanent solution
because any solution provided will either be temporary, even
worse or claptrap. Alternative medicine for example may
provide emotional cajole and solace for its victims as a
placebo effect but never cure the underlying disease.
Carbon dioxide or nuclear waste trapping under earths crusts
to solve environmental pollution may avoid temporary
poisoning or damage? But can never solve environmental
pollution permanently because currently people do not have
the formula to pacify radioactive uranium and will be a threat
to our decedents as long they stay biological. Militarization
and more security might keep the peace on the ground but
cannot change the natural coding of bestial man.

Immanuel Kants book The critic of pure reason is the

gravest mistake in history placing him and anyone who
thinks his proposal is right on the wrong side of history.
Because by writing a book as a critique of the only effective
remedy for all of humanities issues he advertised his
shallowness and some would say idiocy to the world. He
should have written a book as a critique of idealistic
escapism in order to push and encourage people to climb the
forbidding mountain to claim their solutions and mirth.
Saving himself the embarrassment on history as well as

- 23 -
saving mankind from extinction instead of floundering in
delirium in his so called transcendental idealism

Finally, to conclude the article I would like to encourage

people to embrace as well as exercise pure reason, engage the
blackboard as much as possible even though our intelligence
and nature might not allow it because it is in our interest to
do so in order to reach self-existence and usher in a new era
of natural masterdom rather than natural thralldom i.e.
slavery to the forces of nature.

The more man understands nature and is able to develop

spells or equations to manipulate it the more godly and
blissful he becomes he can feed himself, heal self and
change himself; he will never have a need for socialism,
capitalism or mysticism; he will basically become what
mystics call divine; he will render himself omnipotent. But,
in order to accomplish all these tasksfirst he must develop
a strong bond for pure reason and the blackboard where he
will develop the necessary spells or equations.

1.4 Illusion is a toxic and fatal pseudoscience to our

rational mind

Illusion is a stratagem. By distorting incoming perceptions

illusionists or magicians as they are commonly called abuse
our senses and insult our intelligence, compelling us into
creating distorted concepts about the real world metaphysical
truths and our empirical experience in general.

- 24 -
Since ancient times magic and mysticism were closely
related. Todays stage 'performance' styled magic or illusion
may seem non-superstitious, performed just for 'fun' and
seem entertainment, but we should never forget where it
came from. It is still a mystical art of confounding the
objective mind and destroying reason. In this case we must
be vigilant about this hoax and claptrap called illusion as we
ought to be, when we are confronted with similar other
pseudosciences which are a threat to our reason and mental
salubrity.

Pseudosciences take several shape and form, some of them

seem like an art of entertainment, some look like a system of
worship, some look like therapeutic medical systems but
what makes them all identical is their abhorrence for truth
and reality. Their hatred towards reason and the material
world.

Their unwillingness or incapability to be engaged with reality

and truth. Their repugnance towards evidence based
existence or ebeism. Their irresistible pulse to deceive
mankind and maintain their own selfish interests. These
individuals are skilled actors they are experts in totalitarian
subjugation of the human mind to distortions and lies. They
are either naive themselves or perform and promote their
pseudosciences, theories, and arts of fobbing due to spite.

Magic was mostly associated with rituals and sacrifices in the

past before it became some sort of stage art. If I am asked
whether magic is an entertainment I would say no. I would
further enunciate that I am being abused by magicians rather
than being 'entertained' because, how can we say that

- 25 -
somebody is being 'entertained' while his awareness and
reason is under onslaught from purposely distorted percept
and perceptions?

Reality is more fascinating and salubrious to witness than

illusion. A walk in a park within nature is more salutary than
to seek entertainment from an abusive unhealthy stage art. A
real magic is when I see a seed slowly turn into unfledged
plant, a black hole in space burping into space after
devouring a star; a cell undergoing mitosis; a macrophage
engulfing and invading bacteria in our body; copper sulphate
solution and zinc undergoing oxidation reaction; a
chameleon changing its appearance in alignment with its
surrounding. Now these are the priceless shows of magic of
nature. This is where we need to invest our attention on the
magnificent shows of natural phenomena without any
mystical interpretations with a pure objective and scientific
approach.

Mysticism is of course what preceded objective science

before the scientific method. It was the beginning of science.
Mystics, magicians, witches, and sorcerers were primordial
scientists with their potions, herbs, rituals, trepanations,
exorcisms, sacrifices and so forth. This is how science
commenced with witchcraft and sorcery. In an attempt by
mankind to explain nature and provide remedies to his
challenges magic, mysticism, and superstition were
established to provide answers to metaphysical questions and
cures to metaphysical ailments. Resolving the question of
ontology by answers like pantheism or monotheism and
diagnosing ailments as caused by evil spirits and demons or
anger of the gods etc.
- 26 -
They attempted to influence even control nature for their own
interests; for example they wanted to create rainfall in times
of drought by prayers, ritual dancing, libations, supplications,
sacrifices etc. Magic, mysticism, and superstition, are
primordial and precursors of the present objective and
evidence based science. Our ancient ancestors attempted to
explain the natural world from a mystical and superstitious
vantage point.

The science that began with magic, sorcery and superstition

has advanced tremendously into a materialistic objective
discipline providing real objective answers and real
demonstrable cures. Unfortunately, the mystical philosophy,
interpretation and vantage point of ancient times has become
toxic to the 21 century rational man and his way of life that
dwells in a rapidly advanced objective materialist society.
The ancient interpretation of the natural world must leave the
throne to the modern objective interpretation of the natural
world.

What we are witnessing today is the standoff between

primordial science and modern science. The conflict between
mysticism and materialism. The conflict between reason and
whim. The conflict between ebeism and nebeism. The
conflict between commonsense and vagary. The art of
ancient mysticism is being held as a form of dogmatic life
style by the current 21st century descendants as something
not to be discarded and held firmly in opposition to the up to
date discoveries and theories of the modern world.

The philosophy of our ancestors should never be a dogma it

has to be discarded in place of modern science. So that we

- 27 -
can live our lives based on evidence rather than dogma,
materialism rather than mysticism, naturalism rather than
spiritualism. Many of the theories of our ancestors explaining
ailments for example has been proven today as not a
'demonic' possession ,but a simple chemical imbalance in the
brain; Earth quakes are not anger of the gods but due to
tectonic plates and so on. Therefore, magical, mystical and
superstitious beliefs of our primitive ancestors should never
be held dogmatically just because they are old.

Old does not mean right.

The reason I have discussed thus far more about superstition

and mysticism rather than the art of illusion should not be
taken as a digression from the topic of the article I am doing
this on purpose because I want to show and stress the point to
the reader that the current stage art of illusion as it is called
today is still a form of superstition because it dejects reason,
probity and bona fide.

Coming back to our title of this article, illusion grew from the
dirt of superstition. Therefore, it is not an objective science
which is based on reason, but on trickery and deception of
the audience. The illusionist on the 21st century as a mystic is
biased by his interest; he aspires for wealth, fame or power.
The title illusionist itself should already make clear what this
art stands for; it is an art which stands in opposition to
realism.

The primary objective of illusion is not the discovery of truth

but it is either the distortion or the smothering of truth to
the dismay of our consciousness. Its objective is not to shine

- 28 -
light on the truth but to shed the truth away from the light.
Illusion short circuits our rational mind with trickery and this
cannot be sensibly termed as an act of entertainment or
empowerment. Illusion is not healthy for the audience or for
anyone who practices it due to its antipathy to realism.

So when you watch a magic show you are not being

entertained you are being abused and retarded. We all live in
the realm of reality and any digression or attempt to distort it
will result in a disorder and malfunctioning of our natural
design. We should also understand that most illusions
themselves are plagiary of scientific phenomenon, for
example the use of electricity and laughing gas, mirrors,
cables, prearranged instruments, hiring actors, installing
audience members etc. to perform stage tricks and labeling
it as 'magic'. There is nothing 'supernatural' about what
magicians demonstrate, it is either purely a natural
phenomenon borrowed from science or a well contemplated
art of deception of our senses. If magicians had supernatural
powers why did the most famous of all magicians Houdini
die in a magic trick? Thus, we must protect our
consciousness from gullibility, delusion and distortionism so
that we can stay within the righteous path of reason and
naturalism.

Never believe in magic, belief is a dirty word to believe is

to sell oneself! Employ your reason at all times, because you
can rest assured that there is nothing beyond nature.
Therefore, whatever manifestations you behold, can never
transcend beyond nature.

Stay a stubborn unbeliever!

- 29 -
 Chapter 3

In defense of objectivism

1.1 Awareness: The most precious possession of the

individual. The need for protecting, defending and
controlling your awareness from abuse and doctrination
by idealistic and mystical flummery

Your awareness is the most precious possession that you

have. You must protect it from being abused and doctrinized
by others with their toxic and poisoness ideology and
propaganda. Predators are after your awareness they want to
infuse their doctrines through either direct preaching or
surreptitious means via the multimedia i.e. news, music,
games, movies, posters, billboards etc. in order to shape your
orientation and attitude according to their interests.

Authoritarian Governments abuse the senses of their subjects

through the radio, TV, billboards, pamphlets, books, and so
forth with a disregard for the dignity, pre-option and health
of the individual. These types of governments and other
idealistic/mystical philosophers are after your awareness.
They are looking for a host to their toxic ideas.

It is through your awareness that you are what you are; your
awareness defines your identity and personality. Hence, you
should always monitor your consciousness and defend it
against poisoness ideologies and recalcitrant impostors
whether philosophers or governments.

- 30 -
According to sociology man is born without culture. He is
socialized and doctrinized starting from primary socialization
i.e. the family and continuing throughout life by many social
forces in his life time. Therefore, this means man has certain
influence in controlling his very identity by monitoring and
managing his senses.

One must control his senses which are responsible for the
creation of concepts in the individuals mind. In order for
him to protect himself from corruptionhe has to manage
what type of person he would end up becoming; by
controlling his senses he will control his life.

Todays zeal and obsession with sham and claptrap

ideologies of radical Islam and other mythological delusion
inducing ideologies is due to the fact that people have
deserted their most precious possession i.e. their awareness
unguarded to be doctrinized and abused by arrogant
impostors who do not have any respect for the individuals
dignity and his absolute right of pre-option.

People today are ignorant of the fact that they are being used
as hosts to other peoples ideas and agenda. They have no
clue that they are being fobbed and herded little cattle.
Opening up their senses and awareness to anything and
anybody. It is this type of people who end up destroying our
world.

You should be the monitor and manager of your own senses

sifting through useful knowledge and toxic useless nonsense.
Things only exist to you if you perceive them. If an
individual controls what he sees, what he hears, what he
perceives through his five senses then he will control what he
- 31 -
knows. Therefore, if you want to stay away from poisoness
doctrines then you must control your senses only exposing
your senses and awareness to your preferred perception.

If one asks why toxic and sham ideologies get more

followers? The answer is very simple because the amount
of simpletons and sick people is numerous than the amount
of sophisticated and healthy people. Therefore, corruptors
will have more victims to abuse and doctrinize.

The reason why we have a violent world inundated in

terrorism and savagery from Australia to North America is
due this fact mentioned above. This is the reason why we see
people animated by inane doctrines committing the most
heinous crimes against humanity.

Empowerment is a hard and challenging venture which

requires enthusiasm and fortitude while mental health
requires a psychiatrist but in our very time those who seek
knowledge and enlightenment are rare and limited just like
the amount of psychiatrists on the planet.

Hence, ignorance and mental illness are becoming a serious

issue and treat to humanity. Unsophisticated people are the
first to fall victim to profound non-sense and mad individuals
are the first source of societal illness. It is their sick ideas
which infects others and unleash them in a rabid destructive
rampage.

We can observe this in our world today from certain

corrupted and deluded groups like Al-shabab, Boko-haram,
ISIS and so on. People who join and venetate these nihilistic
inhumane groups are either callow or sick. Because
- 32 -
mysticism and nebeism as said elsewhere is the refuge of the
shallow and the morbid.

Shifting to related topic it is mutual agreements on

ideologies which creates unions/societies/groups. The
integration and disintegration of a union is solely based on
individual agreements. People who support these claptrap
ideologies of the above mentioned groups must be shallow or
morbid in order to agree to their promises. Because who
would agree to ideas which are so dark and tormenting rather
than bright and liberating?

People must be taught that they have a responsibility to guard

and defend their awareness. In addition, they have an
absolute right to pre-option and deliberation in their decision
making process. They should be encouraged to empower
themselves and maintain their health against damage by
nocuous doctrines and corrupted philosophers. So that they
can choose only sapient ideas and doctrines which benefit
humanity rather than harm it.

I believe by launching amystology as a skeptical philosophy

which is founded on a single pillar of ebeism and which
promotes eight values the world will be a better place for
humanity because man will be protected against the
devastating and nocuous doctrines founded on nebeism.

Therefore, by distancing our awareness from these sickening

ideologies we would be doing ourselves and humanity in
general a huge favor in terms of maintaining our salubrity in
all five spectrums. Any theory can be categorized into either
the realist camp or the idealist camp; by careful examination
you can figure out where it fits reflexology, scientology,
- 33 -
astrology, and so forth for example are idealistic doctrines
which are not realistic or ebeical.

Once you understand these doctrines are not realistic you

categorize them in the idealist camp and ignore them until
they embrace reason and are verified. This is how you protect
your awareness from injury by the detrimental, baneful and
corrupting cult of Idealism and its several branches which
come with several hyponyms.

It does not matter into what branch of idealism it fits

whether it is the material branch or the spiritual branch any
theory which does not embrace reason and evidence can be
designated as idealism and mysticism. Hence, in order to
protect our awareness from injury we must always hold on to
reason and evidence in order to distinguish idealistic
fairytales from realistic facts.

- 34 -
 Chapter 4

In defense of naturalism

1.1 Testing naturalism and supernaturalism in search for

the theory of everything

When we observe our world and our challenges which

demand solutions; we usually think about turning either to
supernaturalism or to naturalism. The supplication of a
supernatural entity to bring about remedies has failed terribly
in every single attempt in history; prayers, sacrifices, alms,
rhapsodies etc. never worked; as an example let us consider
the issue of drought and famine and objectively test without a
bias the theories of supernaturalism and naturalism.

Can the pope or any 'spiritually ' esteemed figure provide a

solution for drought or Ebola? Can he make it rain or heal
patients? Unfortunately he cannot; there is no record in
history where a drought or famine has been solved by staring
into space and crying your eyes out in supplication to a
supposedly supernatural entity. Other challenges like
epidemics, poverty, environmental challenges, wars,
relationship issues etc. cannot be solved by ranting and
vagary.

When we come to naturalism among several other issues just

drought itself can be solved by a process called cloud
seeding; which, is used to create rainfall by dispersing
compounds like silver iodide ; humans can basically be like
gods and make it rain by spraying substances into the
atmosphere; they can create actual rain! Now isn't this
amazing? Naturalism passes the test with flying colors!
- 35 -
What does this tell us about the natural world? I do not want
to rush into conclusions but doesnt this tell us that nature
itself is a god and humans are the metamorphoses of nature?

Considering the above argument epidemics like Ebola,

plague environmental pollutions etc. can only have natural
solutions; when supernaturalism is tested to solve this issues
the outcome was absolute failure; I challenge spiritualists to
come up with a solution to the above mentioned human
challenges. Did they solve famine? Did they solve epidemics
like Ebola? Did they solve environmental pollution? Did they
solve wars among states just by invoking a celestial super
power? What did supernaturalism contribute to our world,
other than schizophrenia, the god delusion and numerous
wars of blood bath among various mystical sects and tribes?
Why do we need super naturalism any wayif it does not
have any positive contributions to mankind? If it is incapable
of solving any natural issue.

Supernaturalism is an absolute bunk which can never pass

the litmus test. Materialism in opposition to spiritualism
contributed so much to mankind because it is a metaphysical
truth. If spiritualism was a metaphysical fact; all our
challenges could have been solved by any spiritual man on
the planet just by the dint of his wishes; but fortunately god is
dead but nature is alive and the universe is made up of atoms
not spirits; hence, only materialism can work and be effective
in providing solutions for our mundane challenges. Some
might state that what about ethical issues? I already did write
about this issue in an article entitled ethical engineering and
stated that human behavior emanates from the human design
and human nature; hence as wild as it may sound ethical
- 36 -
solutions can exclusively be provided by biological
engineering; by altering and mutating human nature which
is 100% natural; hence, ethics can only be solved by natural
alterations not supernatural supplications.

Supernaturalism fails at every test that it is put into; actually

supernaturalism gave the world crusades and holy wars in the
name of the unknowable god; they gave people schizophrenic
delusions and several other physical diseases. Poverty, false
hope, and genocides like the Canaanite and the Armenian
genocide inspired by mystical zealotry. Once, again the
source of human behavior is human nature i.e. nature herself
implying the fact that human nature is shaping our world.
Therefore, editing and tampering with the human design or
human embryos is a must; in order, to cleanse mankind from
abhorable and heinous behaviors. Spiritualism can never edit
what is in our genes; similarly spiritualism can never create
rain or eradicate Ebola just by wishful thinking and
sacrificing goats for a mute statue or an invisible super being;
who, only exists in the human fancy.

Creating rain and eradicating Ebola is the business of

materialism and science; which flawlessly accomplishes
these feats with efficacy; because, whether it is water or
Ebola virus they are all made up of matter which demand an
understanding and skill in materialism; signifying the fact
that materialism is an indispensable philosophy in our
material world; where, everything including our thought is
matter. Supernaturalism supplicates a spirit; one might ask
where is this spirit? What does it look like? What are its
dimensions? How can a spirit which is not made up of matter
enter the human consciousness? How can my occipital lobe
- 37 -
designed to translate photon energy receiving data via the
optic chiasma into meaningful images by accepting data from
cones and rods in my retina; possibly understand a spirit;
which is not matter at all? A spirit is not just untested but
untestable? Therefore, supernaturalism does not just fail the
test of efficacy but it presents itself to the folly of super
naturalists, unexaminable shrouded in mystery.
Mysteriousness or mysticism can never solve droughts,
famines, epidemics and wars.

Therefore, for better or for worse we are stuck with

materialism; therefore wasting our energy on spiritualism and
supernaturalism is futile and not conducive for humanity.
Now the question might arise whether nature has a mind and
the material world is conscious directing itself on course?
This is a very problematic question because I do not know
whether nature is conscious or not because I do not see a face
when I stare into space at night; I only see a determining
force made up of atoms and matter; if this is so, what does
this mean; is nature the theory of everything even though we
do not have an evidence to suggest that it is conscious? My
answer is that I am very much comfortable with an object
which works and seems to be incomplete than
supernaturalism which is untestable and utterly inefficient on
the ground. Thus I am as confused as you are by this
dilemma but I am very much happy to stick with what works
than a supernatural theory of everything which is untestable
and unverifiable. Which absolutely inefficacious!

If there was a God that we all can see and verify as well as
designate as the theory of everything; then, I am willing to
accept it; but unfortunately it does not exist for man even if it
- 38 -
did; because god is not material according to theologians.
Hence without wasting much inkI would like to conclude
that materialism works effectively; thus, even if we do not
see a face on the pillar of creation; when we look into the
universe through our telescopes; which is a space dust and
the beginning material for the creation of stars and planets as
well as human beings; we should be very much comfortable
with the fact that materialism and naturalism work on the
ground and can be utilized to solve any of our issues
including the problem of death itself. It passes the test with
flying colors even though it might not seem to be the theory
of everything.

1.2 Higher reality

What is meant by the phrase higher reality? How can there

be something higher than all material data; but, still be real
at the same time? We have already established that our brain
can encode or transduct (i.e. changing sound, light, taste,
texture and odor data into electricity that the brain can
understand to form an idea) as it is technically called by
psychologists only material energy.

In addition, the word reality itself comes from the Latin word
rerum which means matter; hence, anything real has to be
material in order to be real. Now, consider the following?
How is it possible for anything to be immaterial (higher) and
at the same time be real (material)? Isnt higher reality an
oxymoron; like white blackness, sweet bitterness, short
longness, deafening silence and so on?

- 39 -
What do mystics and their disoriented followers mean by the
term higher? Are they trying to denominate a concept which
represents another form of matter like dark matter, and dark
energy which does not exist in the periodic table or are they
attempting to denominate an entity which is totally
immaterial? If the latter is the case; then, it will be useless for
any man!

My understanding why people create such terms is their

fallible nature and ignorance of the true causes responsible in
the manifestation of incidences in the natural world like the
creation of life and intelligence. Mystics generally possess an
ambivalent and bipolar position; they want to have their cake
and eat it to; they advocate a mysterious immaterial reality
(immaterial materiality); while at the same time stating that it
is not mysterious at all and is absolutely comprehendible. In
short, they have a schizophrenic position with a split
personality; a profoundly perplexed consciousness and a
topsy-turvy attitude in their overall behavior.

As I may have said elsewhere rationalism distresses our

inchoate primate brain into nausea; because man is not
designed by nature to be an infallible machine with a
superfast rational processing unit; we tend to slip to the realm
of irrationality when the going gets tough in our
investigation, examination and comprehension of our natural
world. This slip up will neither solve our problems or
augment the standard of life for us or for our descendants and
the consequence are dire for those who renounce reason and
evidence as their way of life; nature will chastise them with
mental, emotional, or physical disorders; the only thing one

- 40 -
will attract in idealism and mysticism is not the theory of
everything but the ailment of schizophrenia.

Therefore, anything cannot be immaterial (spirit) and

material (matter); black and white; dead and alive; short and
long; hot and cold at the same time! This breaks the first law
of thought in logic which is The law of non-contradiction
This type of behavior is a symptom of muzziness and
witlessness within human nature. Unfortunately, man is not
built to be 100% rational and efficient by nature. This defect
in our nature is the one which is responsible for so much of
the disorder in our thinking as well as behavior on the
ground.

Two opposite qualities will cancel out each other to produce

a non-entity. Therefore, there is no higher reality i.e.
(immaterial materiality), sweet bitterness, deafening silence,
dead liveliness (afterlife), white blackness, short longness
and so on. These terms are the product of an immature,
perplexed and disturbed consciousness.

As a conclusionIn order to prevent ourselves from falling

into the ditch of schizophrenia we need to apply the laws of
logical thinking as was formulated by Aristotle by reading a
good book on Logic and trying to comprehend all logical
fallacies in order to maintain a sharp rational mind and a
salubrious physical state. Inadditon, we need to support the
enhancement of the human organism into a better and higher
being free from bestiality and irrationality.

- 41 -
1.3 Supernaturalism: The revered equivocation and
condoned madness

No theory has grasped the imagination and caused so much

damage to the society than the self-defeating theory of
supernaturalism; many people do not bother to examine the
term closely to understand that the word itself is an
amalgamation of opposite values; which will end up giving a
non-entity. Super (immaterial) natural (material) will give us
the meaningless phrase immaterial materiality. The most
astonishing thing in mysticism is that people do not either
have the time, energy or the passion to investigate what they
have accepted by habit and argumentum ad populum (appeal
to people) fallacy; they do not realize that by embracing
theories which clearly state that they are not made for
mankind; they plunge themselves into benightedness and
destruction; ending up destroying their material mind and
body forcing it to operate beyond its design; they never
cease for a moment to contemplate their design practically;
which, leads them to great error; when they attempt to
comprehend the incomprehensible. Now, only immature
individuals fall for this terminological word salad and
stratagem which stands for absence. Hence, god must lie in
nature not outside it, supernaturalism is a big zero, and god is
still undiscovered and unknown.

Once, we have established the meaningless of the term

supernatural with similar denotation as other equivocations
like deadly liveliness or bitter sweetness; we focus our
attention into the natural world; where the theory of
everything exists; to examine it thoroughly which will take
us several decades and generations to finally complete our
- 42 -
understanding of nature. In this very process we will uncover
several secrets of nature previously unknown to the benefit of
the sentient world in general; in this process we will uncover
the greatest discoveries in all of humanitys history which
will be a complete theory to explain reality. This complete
theory will be invaluable and indispensable in our further
investigation, manipulation and comprehension of the natural
world. The next generation which will come after the
discovery will be the most beneficiary segment of the
sentient world. In our 21st century we live under the blanket
of ignorance about so much elements of the natural world;
we do not know the complete theory about nature; we do not
know why there is evolution and what is behind it. The only
thing we know is the howwe know how we have
evolved but we do not know why and what makes it happen
and for what purpose? These last three questions are the ones
that will be answered when we figure out the complete theory
about nature.

Supernaturalism as mentioned in the thesis above is a big

zero. How can one say that there exists a non-corporeal
world while possessing a corporeal mind? Is this even a
sensible statement? It is like a color blind man proclaiming
the existence of colors that he cannot detect and despite the
fact that the specific spectrums of light can never enter his
awareness. This type of statements could only be just blind
opinions charged with a little bit of heedlessness and
arrogance; because if you ask yourself the questioned
mentioned above; you will easily find yourself laughing at
the absurdity of your own statement; because things could
only be labeled as true or extant if and only if they are
observed; arguments for the existence of non-corporeal or
- 43 -
supernatural entities could only be termed as opinions; as a
matter of fact all unobservable concepts are opinions. But the
most preposterous thing about supernaturalism is that it
shoots itself in the medulla oblongata by saying that: what it
forwards as extant is immaterial which makes it not
unobserved but unobservable forever! Hence,
supernaturalism collapses due to suicide; the extinguishers of
god are not atheists but super naturalists themselves by
attempting to hide their god from scrutiny they made him
ammactive (incapable of reacting with anything natural).
Therefore, it is absolutely okay to dismiss any opinion;
because there is no obligation to accept it as a fact; it does
not benefit you or harm you in anywayit has no
beneficence or maleficence; especially the suicidal concept
of supernaturalism. You wouldnt feel anything if the
supernatural god hit you in the face; you wouldnt see him if
he stuck his tongue out in disrespect or hear him if he
insulted you at the top of his lungs.

God (the theory of everything), spirit (energy), soul (mind)

etc. are antique terminologies used by our ancestors in
reference to the natural world. They were as inquisitive as we
are today attempting to explain their metaphysical
manifestations and gain some knowledge about their reality.
Even after thousands of years we the so called modern
human beings; who live in the technological era havent been
able to figure out the complete story about nature. In order to
complete our knowledge we will need several decades, and
centuries. Despite, the existence of the complete theory in
nature we are not yet capable to specifically identify it;
hence, still subsists unknown.

- 44 -
Finally, as an epitome people need to understand that
supernaturalism is a non-entity; the idea of immateriality is
worthless; which has no benefit or detriment to any natural
organism; the attempt to invest our attention and energy into
immateriality is an attempt to comprehend an absence. In the
process causing mental, emotional, physical, economic and
social destruction; that we are witnessing in our world today;
this types of simple errors in our syntax and thinking could
lead to great catastrophe in the outside world; because it is
human nature that shapes the world in its own image; which
means that we need to be vigilant in our thinking and
behaviors not to embrace spurious theories which could lead
to irrational behaviors, arrogance and sadism.

1.4 Vetting spiritualism

The most ridiculous thing about spiritualism is not just the

fact that it can never be detected even if it was around but the
very fact that the evidence presented for spiritualism is
material. The evidence for a supernatural god is nature and
other seemingly abstract natural forces like magnetism,
gravity and electricity. If people had immortal spirits in their
bodies then why cant paralyzed people walk; why cant
comatose patients who are still alive gain full consciousness?
Why do they collapse into coma in the first place if the soul
is infallible? The most favorite argument as I have said
elsewhere raised by mystics to validate spiritualism is that
because atoms do not have minds therefore, spiritualism
must be right. They say atoms can never direct themselves in
to order to produce the Cosmos as we know it. But my

- 45 -
question to these people is that have you observed that these
building blocks of reality are also in disorder in certain
portions of the cosmos i.e. there is no life or intelligent
design. In addition, why do you tacitly remove the laws of
nature as the source of order from your arguments so that it
will easier for you to attack materialism by committing the
straw man fallacy? I official admit that we cannot explain
everything at this moment in time about consciousness and
the cosmos; but does this mean that we need to invent the
term spirit which is an invalid term without an object or a
subject to eradicate our ignorance about nature? The most
astonishing thing about the term spirit is like this code I
just invented 1SXXCV55 which does not mean anything or
represent an object. Spirit also has no representative object
on the ground as well as a subject in the mind; it is invalid
just like the code above.

To state that whether an atom is conscious is to inquire

whether a brick is a house. Even children understand that a
brick is not a house; but it is capable of building a house and
my concept about life and consciousness is similar with this
mentioned analogy; atoms may not have a mind but in an
ordered fashion they can create life, sensation, sentience and
mind. We must always remember the two pillars of truth
sensibility and demonstrability to govern our theories so that
we can prevent ourselves from falling into gaucherie and
invalid systems like spiritualism. Nobody in history even the
so called prophets themselves had a mental image of a
spirit or an objective representative on the ground; that they
can palpate and verify to the world. For example, I have a
mental image of a table in my head which represents the
object on the ground that I can palpate. A table is a fact that I
- 46 -
can see and touch as well as create a representative form or
idea of it in my head. But does anyone in history have a
mental image an immaterial spirit? What are its figures?
What are its dimensions? What does it look like? What does
it feel like when touched with our squishy hands? How can
we possibly encode it in our hippocampus? Mystics say
Angels are made up of lights, have wings and so forth; now
light and wings are material entities not immaterial building
blocks; therefore, how could angels be immaterial? They
admit implicitly the materiality of their imagination itself;
even their mind can never imagine anything immaterial;
conforming the theory of natural absolutism. The definition
of god in Islamic mythology is that he is a light; but, even
light is material. So what are these people talking about? If
we cannot palpate a spirit or have a mental image of it just
like the table I mentioned above then what can it ever be
except an invalid?

Some might say that spirit is an antique term in reference

to the force which moves matter i.e. energy or which
animates the human body which is the mind (another form of
energy i.e. electricity); if this is the case then we can agree
cordially with mystics that the term spirit is valid with an
objective representative that anybody can see on the ground
i.e. electrical energy, wind energy, gravitational force etc.
which seem abstract and possess subjective representatives or
images of themselves in our minds. Now, the term spirit will
be valid and have an object that we can palpate and a subject
that we can recall. But, if mystics proclaim that a spirit is not
material at all; then, they will retain their position as
investors into absence all over again and advocates of
symbols and delusion.
- 47 -
Spiritualism is an investment into absence and engagement
with zero; a symbol without a reference. A term invented to
label our ignorance about eternal nature; the reason I say that
nature is absolute and eternal is not because of the law of
conservation of matterbut because of the human design
which possesses a material mind even if nature was
destructible man can never perceive or imagine unnatural
objects; he can never escape nature even in his dreams.
Therefore, the idea of spirituality is dead and gone; invalid
terminologies can never solve or quench our thirst for the
theory of everything which is still under investigation; we
must abandon all invalid terms like supernaturalism,
spiritualism, intuitionism which do not have objects on the
ground or subjects in our minds to verify their existence; in
order to save ourselves from great error and blight. Just
because the term spirit sounds fancy it does not mean it is
either valid or true.

Nature is absolute!

1.5 Nature is a totalitarian force which is uncreated and

indestructible

Mystics and these so called "spiritualists" fool them

themselves as if they can "transcend" into "another"
dimension. They lose themselves in a dream of zealotry
arrogantly rejecting and ignoring the voice of reason which
calls onto them to come back to their senses to embrace their
real creator which is nature. These people create imaginary
and physical chimeras with incompatible qualities to
represent the theory of everything or in other words which
- 48 -
they "think" is the real metaphysical fact. They loathe the
material world stating that it is not conscious"
notwithstanding that the exclusive material world is all there
is and it determines their very existence without which they
cannot survive for a fraction of a second.

It is an established fact that one cannot switch off the

material world or what physicists call quantum vacuum:
which is when all matter is removed from space-time
including atoms and so on giving you basically a vacuum;
but this vacuum is not empty! Even at this state virtual
particles come in and out of existence i.e. something will pop
in and pop out of existence even at this vacuum state.
Therefore, to say that nature is an ephemeral metaphysical
entity is really erroneous and inconsistent with evidence.

The term "spirit" is a term used to denominate the force of

nature as Baron (18th century philosopher) states;
spiritualists and mystics intended by detaching the force or
the energy of matter from matter and bestowing human
characters, identities and consciousness upon it to finally
create a personal god; in order to make themselves feel
much comfortable about uncertain life events and satisfy
their craving for social interactionism with a personal god
rather than dealing with senseless and unconscious nature
which operates by formulas and natural laws. Our creator
nature does not have a face or a personality or a golden chair;
which it occupies or a long white beard that it pets or a magic
wand that that it moves around to dictate mundane
manifestations; but, possesses eternal laws and formulas
which determine our existence.

- 49 -
The most ridiculous thing about "supernaturalists" and
"spiritualists" is that they cannot even escape nature in
imagination, ranting, arrogance, irrationality, scorn, delusion,
and schizophrenia because all of these processes are natural.
This is the reason that I have stated in the title that nature is
totalitarian; we cannot even think something unnatural;
because, even our thoughts themselves are electric currents in
micro voltage firing in our brain cells and electricity is a
natural force.

Hence, basically nature may not have a mind and a face like
us; but, it does have formulas and laws by which it operates
to demonstrate all types of manifestations that we behold; the
obsession to assign a face and a personality to faceless and
impersonal nature by mystics has created numerous personal
gods made out of blocks of wood and marble as well as
esoteric establishments of worship; which are unintelligible
to the inventors themselves and never stop slaughtering one
another: Muslims murdering Muslims, Christians murdering
Christians and so on which is really unfortunate. In order to
escape this apocalyptic madness; we first need to rectify our
metaphysical vantage point; we need to recognize that nature
is all there is; therefore, our redemption lies exclusively in
natural studies and natural understanding in order to solve
whatever challenges that we are confronted with; because, if
nature is total; then all our challenges as well as solutions are
natural.

Therefore, as a conclusion let us get our metaphysics right

and stick with naturalism; in order, to bring about a better
future for us and our posterities as well as accelerate the rate
of evolution and purging of human nature from animal traits
- 50 -
and weaknesses to bring about a much better world than the
brutal, miserable and tumultuous world that we inhabit today.

1.6 Mystical escapism: The god tapout

All irrational systems in history are the result of reason

phobia and mystical escapism; created in an attempt to
abandon nature. The attempt to run away from nature is like
an attempt to run away from you; which is a ridiculous and
senseless endeavor. When reality becomes unintelligible or
unfavorable super naturalists escape into a dream world of
confusion and fallacy known as mysticism; nature is
complete and encompass all of reality. Chickening out of
science to fall into the abyss of delusion and mystical
floundering just because science strains your rational mind
does not help your progress in the management of nature; in
order to make it conducive to yourself and fellow sentient
beings.

The idea that nature is the work of a higher being is

unrealistic and improvable; because what kind of higher
being creates a mad universe which does not have any
meaningful design or purpose; where its constituents slam
against each other i.e. in case of galaxies and eat each other
i.e. in the case of earths biosphere? What type of
infallible higher being authors such a mad creation? How
can we say that this chaos and miserable universe is the
masterpiece of higher being? Would this statement be
sensible? The Universe could only be the work of a mad God
as mad as the universe itself which can only be nature and
its unpredictable forces.
- 51 -
Our expectation for a rosy metaphysical fact; where the
Universe was made for us and we had a loving creator who
looks after us is a wishful thinking; reality forbids the
existence of such a force because the survival of the fittest
reigns over reality. Unfortunately, life has been made to
become a competition not a free lunch and a blessing; this
how cruel and mad nature is.

The only salvation for man is his understanding of this

mad god which is nature; in order to tame it and manage it
according to his desire. The blind forces of nature have given
birth to more or less advanced primate intelligence; and this
intelligence must be preserved and enhanced so that nature
could study itself by its own mind; to alleviate suffering and
unhappiness. I will swear to you that you are not a design and
your existence in the Cosmos is an accident; all the suffering
on the planet stands as a proof for this argument; if the
universe is made for you why do you feel discontented in
your life?

The refusal of man to heed the voice of reason and submit to

common sense and evidence had lead him astray into the
realm of confusion and madness called mysticism and
idealism; the forbidding nature of the material world and his
inchoate intelligence are additional culprits responsible for
mans creation of various facetious and absurd systems
which are utterly useless in solving his challenges and
potentially deleterious to his mental, emotional, physical,
social, and economic wellbeing. Since, the ancient Sumerians
till the present time man had a tendency to be capricious
rather than rational in defining and explaining the natural
world; this vagary has created so much damage to the society
- 52 -
and prohibited the progress of natural science. The number
one nemesis and retardant of the progress of science and the
masterdom of the human race is mysticism.

I think it is very much important to educate the public that

abandoning naturalism results in the exacerbation of
suffering and the extinction of mankind; idealism and other
inane systems could only proliferate in a society which is
ignorant. Tyrannical systems, instability, poverty, poor
infrastructure i.e. internet, hectic life schedules and
authoritarianism aid in the stupefaction of the individual and
proscribe his empowerment and journey towards wisdom. All
this circumstances facilitate the perfect ground where
mysticism and idealism could flourish. Therefore, there is a
need on global leaders first to stabilize their countries, invest
on in infrastructure and education in order to empower the
individual and liberate him from ignorance which is making
him a perfect recruit for mystics and a victim of terrorism.

An empowered man is incredulous, wise in his steps not to

fall into the traps of terrorist imposters. It is in an ignorant,
unstable and undeveloped area that mysticism and violence
takes root: for example see Somalia; once a stable country
now turned into the dungeon of idealism inebriated groups
like Al-shabab and Al-Qaeda and their dark mystical systems
rule over the agonizing scream of the human soul in that part
of the world. Hence, in order to bring back man kind to
nature we need to stabilize the country, build infrastructure
and give time until they mature become wise enough not to
fall for charlatans and their system of spiritualism.

- 53 -
The violence that we witness today is the result of various
ingredients concocted together as I said above instability,
tyranny, poverty; poor infrastructure, hectic life style, and
indolence create a final product called mysticism and
violence. Young individuals who get recruited by mystical
systems are desperate individuals who are victims of the
above mentioned inconveniences therefore; in order to
destroy the symptoms of idealism like terrorism and violence
first we need to cure the diseases which are the ingredients
mentioned above .

The security and stability of a country encourages

investment which creates more jobs; jobs give people a
preoccupation and a livelihood which will help them in being
industrious and content; security and stability will also aid in
education which will make the individual wise and prudent
about being violent and a dupe of charlatans. In this
circumstance Know yourself as a slogan of naturalism will
replace the slogan of mystics know your god; it is only
here that man will understand that his nature itself is
responsible for his experiences and begins to attribute the
rightful title of divinity to nature and all manifestations;
accordingly will be motivated to alter and seek natural
solutions to his natural challenges like poverty and violence;
this will proscribe his astrayment into spiritualism, and the
god tap out. Come back to nature and you will solve all your
challenges and create a blissful futuristic world

- 54 -
1.8 The hype about god and the afterlife

I am seriously exhausted about writing another criticism on

mythology and defunct concepts of antiquity. But for the
sake of convenience in order to finish this article I would like
to point out that supernaturalism as a bestselling traditional
oxymoron propagated by sensationalism is still the source of
global hype and dogma. By forwarding their pillar argument
because nobody created themselves; therefore, there must be
a creator. They aspire to rule the world. First of all nobody
denied the existence of a determining force which is nature
and second just because nature is not a person with face just
like you have hoped it that does not mean that you are not
totally determined by nature. Your yearning for a personal
god that will stick its head out of the clouds to call your name
and rub your head in clemency will never exist just because
you want it to be so.

Nature is not a personal god. It is a force that we know little

about and still is under investigation. The reason why mystics
and their dupes think there is another dimension is either due
to naivety or schizophrenia. The voices and images that
believers hear and see makes them think that there is another
dimension and makes them feel they are on the right
direction. They provide as evidence these delusions as proofs
for the existence of supernatural entity. We should also
note that what ancient and current mystics call revelations are
symptoms of schizophrenia i.e. voices and images. So holy
books are diaries of mad men who inscribe what their voices
in their heads dictate to them. Who would in the right mind
wants to slaughter his son as was the case with Abraham?

- 55 -
Anyways, our ancestors thought that their experiences of
delusion where a great discovery that emanated from a
holy dimension; they promoted the manner of being
delusional to other fellow humans thinking that it is an
indispensible virtue that any man must embrace; they merged
some moral values with delusional spiritualism to create what
we call a system of faith. A great mental illness was
conjugated with moral values, social systems and the yearly
calendar to create several branches of faith in history. Thanks
to natural studies and investigation most of our ignorance
about the natural world has been solved propelling us into
the era of natural absolutism and the end of mysticism. We
today have established that the material world is not made up
of spirits but various atomic particles which determine us
all; we have established thanks to logic that two opposite
qualities create an absence; thanks to several fallacies
identified we now know how to distinguish and purge our
language from erroneous patterns of thinking that could lead
us to extinction. All these discoveries have driven us out
from dark superstition to bright rationalism. Dispelling any
attempt to mystify and spiritualize reality in the process.

Dualism has ended up becoming a form delusion called the

god delusion just like delusional parasitosis which is
impairment where people think that they are infected by
parasites crawling under their skin. Its epistemology has
failed terribly as well as its metaphysics. It can be true that
we cannot expect people or our ancestors at the time of
Abraham to have an understanding of the natural world that
we in 21st century have in order for them to become atheists
and even immoralists it was absolutely natural for people at
ancient times to be mystical and spiritual as well as super
- 56 -
natural because of technological ignorance and lack of
experimentation.

Today, we have so much intelgnos we are bragging to be

immortalthis is how far we have come from superstition to
naturalism. Thus, we can see the progress of humanity from
polytheism to pending selftheism. This is a progress and
should never be hindered by past dead theories and concepts;
the evolution of human understanding of nature must proceed
in a linear pathway in to infinity. Thus, all antique theories
including the god theory and supernaturalism must surrender
and succumb to new developments and advances in natural
understanding and discovery this is the right direction. This is
how humanity can reach its maximum potential and become
happy.

The reason that the number of atheists and immortalists is

increasing globally is a sign of the evolution of the society
into great stages. It is not the success of natural science but
the failure of supernaturalism to either make sense or be
evident which made it a dead antique rudimentary theory
which can only convince our ancestors and some shallow 21st
century people. Even if it was the success of science that
creates more naturalists; it can only be said that at least
naturalists are sensible enough to follow the evidence and
support realism unlike spiritualists who are in a state of
delirium. In another perspective I cannot totally blame
antique philosophies for being puerile and brutal with their
childish fables and brutal punishments; because, this exactly
reflects the mental structure and character of the dwellers in
ancient times they were shallow and rowdy; therefore, the
formulators of Christianity and Islam needed to be as simple
- 57 -
as kindergarten teachers and as brutal as pirates in order to
set peace and order in the society.

There is no need for puerility or brutality in order to manage

the society today; 21st century man is more sophisticated in
certain aspects than ancient peasants he does not need hype
about another dimension, fables, or reprimand of afterlife to
reach his maximum potential and behave in a society; he just
needs to be dignified, liberated, empowered enough to
understand his nature and enhanced with technologies to
reach self-existence. A better society could only be created
when man becomes preoccupied only with nature as his
source of challenge as well as happiness. The emotional hype
of afterlife is an outdated method of creating a better
society it has expired to the extent that it has become toxic
to the health of the individual and the society as we can
witness from the current world events of supernatural
nihilism happening in Middle East and all over the world by
mystical terrorist. It is those people that are inebriated by
expired toxic ideology that are becoming nuisance to world
peace, stability, growth and happiness. Let us dispose of old
defunct theories of supernaturalism driven by sensationalism
and irrationality that do not fit in with our age in order to
create new onesthat will facilitate and welcome the coming
of a bright future for mankind; a future of science and
technology; let us create new ethical and moral values in a
referendum putting under consideration the character and
maturity of 21st century man; which can benefit every
segment of the society; as well as which supports futurism
and naturalism rather than be a hindrance.

- 58 -
Progress is inevitable the society will evolve whether we like
it or not. Thus, there is a need to surrender to new evidence
and developments in epistemology, metaphysics and ethics.
People today are more attracted towards realism and
rationalism than mythologies and sensationalism. The
systems of mythology and sensationalism of yesterday are
inapplicable today due to the rapid evolution of societies.

1.9 Why do people attempt to escape nature and raise the

meaningless question of priori?

I have probably mentioned this topic somewhere else but I

think it will be necessary to repeat it again because it is the
source of confusion in many people. The question of
beginning is meaningless because to inquire why there is
nature? Is to inquire why there is a god; to inquire what
makes nature go? Is to inquire what makes god go? Now, you
cannot possibly find any answers to these questionsthey
are nonsensical. Current experiments have proved that the
material world is self-existent. So, instead of asking dead end
questions which never bear fruit; we must inquire: how does
nature go?

So, for those people who are dreaming an eternal life beyond
this oneit will never be because they are already living in
one. Those people who think that this world is tentative and
there awaits another dimension that is eternal and blissful are
misguided. It is the uncomfortable nature of the material
world that makes people to yearn for another world which
is ideal and mirthful because they failed in making this world

- 59 -
better and mirthful. This uncomfortabililty is created due to
the ignorance of the material world.

So basically there are two reasons why the question of priori

is raised:

1- An error in logical thinking as stated above in the first

paragraph.
2- The uncomfortable circumstances of life on earth as
stated in the second paragraph.

There is a possibility that if we complete the understanding

of nature which seems to be infinite we have a chance of
creating a blissful utopia world right here in nature. I have
said this so many times but I can get enough of repeating the
statement that the ignorance of nature is the culprit in all
our suffering and unhappiness.

Instead of yearning for another world we need to rebuild this

one into a possible utopia. Terraforming the universe to fit in
with our needs and aspirations must be our preoccupation
rather than composing threnodies and lamenting about our
awful experiences in nature. This can only be performed
through natural understanding. Hence, we must be engaged
in all science subjects in order to figure out how to
manipulate nature. This is the only way to create heaven on
earth. If there is an issue with human nature then we can
redesign it; if there is a problem with the Cosmos like an
incoming asteroid disaster or pollution then we can figure out
an equation on the white board as a remedy. Everything can
be reduced to formulas even happiness which is consider by
mystics as an abstract concept can be broken down into a
simple chemical formula on the black board.
- 60 -
In order to create heaven on earth we need a huge work force
of enthusiastic naturalists with huge brains to unravel and
inscribe the formulas that could make this possible. We need
children to be interested in naturalism rather spiritual
escapism and schizophrenia. Thus, in general the problem
which causes the question of priori to be raised in the first
place is the distressing nature of life here on earth and in
order to change this we need to comprehend the fact that
understanding nature is the only salvation for mankind.
Instead of imaging an ideal dimensionwe can terraform
and placate the material world into a livable heaven for all
sentient beings. Thus, as a terminal statement I would like to
say: stop escaping and start understanding nature in order to
augment the quality of life that you complain about due your
ignorance of matter. You might say where do I start? Or how
do I start solving all my issues? I will say start with a chalk
and a blackboard. If you want to solve the challenging nature
of life on earth by eradicating poverty; then, design a
replicator which can give you food and attire. If you want to
solve cancer; devise the molecular cure and so forth. By
successfully accomplishing these tasks you will eradicate the
useless need to raise the questions of priori, supernatural god
and another dimension because you are comfortable and
successful right here on earth. This success will motivate you
to value life and preserve it rather than be in a self-
mortifying rampage. This success will also help you to stop
creating imaginary dimensions and illogical propositions like
the priori argument.

- 61 -
1.10 Behold: Nature has gained consciousness

I strongly believe that given the current latest information

about our cosmos, study of ontology and so forth; that, the
theory which has evaded so many philosophers throughout
history; maybe, with the exception of the great Aristotle is
the rise of nature by the law of necessity. The material world
in general may not be conscious and intelligent but man (a
material being) who is the apex of the evolutionary process is
conscious; what does this fact tell us? What does the
existence of an intelligent creature within tumultuous and
unconscious nature tell us about reality and the cosmos?
Doesn't this denote the rise or birth of intelligence within
tumultuous nature? I tend to think so. Furthermore, the
universe is not a creation, matter may not be conscious; but,
material man is conscious; the crusade on righteous
materialism is an erroneous position; the evolutionary
process denotes the coming of a super being and the rise of
blind nature.

The universe is not a creation process but an evolutionary

process where blind and insensible nature has adopted to a
niche to acquire consciousness. The very reason not even a
single branch of supernaturalism works or makes any
sense at all is due to the very fact; that every single time man
digresses from realism; he tends to fall in to a ditch of
imaginary fumblings and fairytale fabrication similar to
Disney fairytales; because, matter cannot create or
understand anything outside itself. Supernaturalism is made
up of intermingled and disordered material concepts
reinforced by terrorism and totalitarianism. Therefore,

- 62 -
spiritualism itself cannot escape the material world not even
in imagination because imagination itself is a natural process.

Atoms and other forms of matter are not conscious or

intelligent; but man who is 100 % material is conscious and
intelligent. Hence, what does this imply? The ultimate
cosmological theory according to my diligent observation
and conjecture is that the universe exists because there is a
god (pansophical being) in the making and that being is man;
because he is the one with a paragon intelligence compared
with other creatures; in other words he has a higher
intelligence than any other complex life form on earth. Thus,
he is in a comfortable position to be nominated for the
vacancy of an inchoate god; who is still being enhanced in
infinitum. After several years of contemplation the rise of
nature by the law of necessity is the only theory which makes
absolute sense to a realistic man like me unless otherwise
other sensible and demonstrable evidence is presented.

The crusade on righteous materialism and realism is an

absolutely misguided erroneous position; yes! Nature may
not be conscious at the stage of virtual particles but is
definitely conscious on planet earth. The rise of nature is
evidently verifiable for anyone who is not biased by his
passion and interests; we must always remember that reality
is independent of the observer. People who are obsessed in
extinguishing naturalism and the individual are committing a
heinous crime against a better world and self-existence.
Supernaturalists, idealists and dualists are all proscribing the
progress of humanity into a better life; they promote a self-
mortifying and mortalist culture; which is basically a call to
self-extinction; which is loathsome and insensible. They
- 63 -
should have been apostles of a self-enhancement and
immortalismpromoting infinite intelligence if they intend
to be helpful in making nature a better place.

The evolutionary process indicates that the material world is

in a process of acquiring infinite intelligence; unconscious
matter has already gained consciousness on earth where it is
conducive for life to come about; thus, life is not a creation
but an adaptation to the perfect niche where earth exists
today; any objective observation will elucidate the non-
existence of a super intelligence responsible for nature who is
supposed to be totally intelligent or totally flawless; ground
facts elucidate in a vivid manner that whatever force is
responsible for evolution is an unstable ambivalent force of
creation; who is both intelligent and retarded as well as
merciless and merciful; and nature fits this profile not a
flawless supernatural god as proposed by mystics. A super
intelligence does not exist; at least not yet, but it can be
presumed that the evolution of intelligence will proceed
forward as it did from Tiktaalik to the apex of intelligence at
the current time; which are Homo sapiens.

Therefore, as long as the current metaphysical understanding

and commonsense are concerned the rise of nature by the law
of necessity seems to be the theory of everything.

1.11 What creates superstition?

For any observer who observes the attitude of mystics and

superstitious people and seeks the reason for the creation of
various gods and source of superstition in history starting
- 64 -
from ancient Greeks until today he will reach to three
conclusions. Idealism in general and religion in particular are
the products or creations of mans fear of nature i.e. the fact
that man is isolated in a gigantic cosmos without any
compact or terse explanation on what to make of his
surrounding and give meaning to it. Ignorance of nature i.e.
the fact that he lacks the understanding on how it works and
finally the lack of control over nature i.e. the incapability on
how to control nature. Finally, all these things contribute to
emotional instability and physical suffering. Now, let us see
the three reasons for the creation of gods and spiritual heresy
in detail.

The fear of nature comes from the fact that mankind is

isolated in a huge cosmos just like an orphan without any
notes to explain to him where he is and what he is living in.
The weirdness of the cosmos and fact that he is the only
conscious creature always bewilders himwhich triggers his
insecurity. Instead of alleviating his fear of natural forces by
trying to understand what they are; his limited brain power
proscribes his journey from going that far and divert it into
mystical mummery and instill the most poisoness and corrupt
idea of supernaturalism. He just lays back and states that
nature is work of an ideal character more powerful than
himself. Hence, instead of solving his practical insecurity of
figuring out what nature is; he solves his emotional insecurity
by creating an imaginary ideal character.

What comes next is the ignorance of nature because in the

first step he has made himself oblivious on what nature is by
dismissing it and creating his several mysterious gods and
this obliviousness creates more ignorance of the natural
- 65 -
world which triggers more unhappiness and suffering. His
ignorance is exacerbated by the fraudulent doctrine of natural
negligence and a hatred for the material world. He makes
himself nescient about his dimension by the means of
moving mystical descants, poems, ranting and irrational
attitudes which kill his reason and turn him into a perfect
idiot; or in a mystical reference a perfect spiritualist the
more stupid, and negligent he is about nature and the more
discourteous as well as smirkful he is towards reason the
more holier he is considered by his fellow mystics. This
process will limit the amount of life expectancy and quality
of life of all human beings. Thus, the ignorance of nature
becomes the source of all suffering on earth.

Finally, what comes after the fear of nature, and ignorance of

nature is lack of control over nature. As discussed above the
individual has no idea of his surroundinghe is surrounded
by mindless natural forces, hungry predators who are
designed to eat him, a very harsh climate of summer and
winter; and not a single written document to remind and
empower him where he is; and what he is surrounded with;
which, leads him to superstitious escapism. Just like a little
girl who needs to hug a teddy bear and requests a bed time
story from her guardians to relieve her anxiety of her dark
bedroom in order to have relief; grownups also hold on to
superstitious toys, demand folklore as emotional stabilizers
and cradle songs from their holy fathers to keep them
going in an uncertain world. When man acquires experiences
in alignment with his expectations he becomes grateful and
is filled with tears of joy; when he acquires experiences in
opposite to his interests he laments and curses in agony.
Hence, the anxiety as well as his paradoxical behavior is
- 66 -
evidence which suggest that man is not in control of nature.
The limitation of man renders him to have no control over
natural forces and make his daily experience uncertain;
which exacerbates his trepidation and emotional uncertainty
this uncertainty creates superstitious rituals. And
consequentially physical suffering which in turn create
religious threnody targeted at space where nothing exists.

Therefore, as a conclusion fear of nature, ignorance of nature

and lack of control over nature become a domino effect
which stray humanity into extinctionrather than longevity
and may be even immortality. If man understands what
nature is, how it works and finally has a control over it he
will not have a need for rituals or mysticism. His self-
inferiority to an imaginary god that he created will be
replaced by relief, security and self-esteem. He will become
the master of his destiny. Therefore, instead of creating
imaginary ideal characters humanity needs to solve the three
things mentioned in the thesis of this essay in order to make
him happy and prosperous.
Note: Remember that, when I am critical about superstition I do not intend to reject the
existence of a determining fore or a creator because there is a creator which is nature.
What I am critical about is two things: 1 st supernaturalism because it is an oxymoron and
2nd any mystical engagement with nature i.e. natural mysticism which includes all branches
of idealism. Therefore, as an important general reminder people must stay away from
supernatural as well as natural mysticism. Rationalism is the only viable means of
engagement with the only determining force which is nature.

1.12 Nothing is designed and life exists due to chance and

necessity

Life exists due to an accident and necessity. When

Democritus said that everything existing in the universe is
- 67 -
the fruit of chance and necessity he was spot on because
even though quantum physics did not exist at his time he was
pointing to the fact that, there were two worlds at existence
the quantum world (microscopic) were all the physical,
chemical, and mathematical laws of nature break down to
create some sort of madness were uncertainty reigns. And the
physical (macroscopic) world which is predictable due to the
physical, chemical, and mathematical laws that determines
celestial bodies as well as biological organisms. Thus,
Democritus was right manifestations in nature occur due to
probability and necessity not due to a design. The universe
exists due to probability (chance) i.e. big bang and life exists
due to necessity i.e. evolution end of story. But the funny
thing is that people as well as governments do not like to hear
this; due to the fact that they lack control over their destinies
or experiences. This lack of control or uncertainty on which
the universe operates as I said somewhere else will create a
sense of insecuritywhich triggers vagary rather than
reason. This is where all belief systems and mystical
organizations come into existence. If man had a total control
over his destiny there would never have been a need for
rituals and a single belief system or irrational cult on earth.
Thus, unfortunately for us the universe is both governed by
probability and necessity. There is nothing we can do about
probability but we can manage the macroscopic world of
order and laws if we have the motivation and the ample
intelligence to make it happen.

At the time of our infancy and even at teenage years when we

were shallow and immature we were dragged by our nave
parents and guardians to mystical institutions either to church
or the mosque in order to swallow the erroneous doctrines
- 68 -
and propaganda of mystics that life is a design, we are from
another dimension and we are not from this world and so
on. But when we grow up, get more matured and
sophisticated we start to question these irrational and
fallacious propositions which contradict with our daily
experiences and our observations as well as commonsense by
asking apt questions like: if our origin is really form another
dimension why cant anybody remember anything about the
dimension that he supposedly came from? Why cant we
remember the length, width, color and overall nature of this
supposedly another dimension? Nobody in the world even
in all of history including the Pope himself have any
memories of another dimension. If this is the case how can
we say that life is a creation and we are from another
dimension? Mystics will be quick to respond by saying You
have the idea of god; which proves you are from another
dimension. Well, I will reply by saying that I have an idea
of vampires too so, does that mean that vampires also exist
in heaven? Does the existence of subjects necessitate the
existence of objects? Do subjects like vampires, unicorns,
dragon, etc. have representative objects in objective reality?
Just because I have an idea of them does this mean that
they must be real? Subjects do not necessitate the existence
of objects! Therefore, the argument that life is a design and
we came from another dimension is in conflict with reason,
commonsense and daily observations. Go on an experiment
today in your life observe your experiences and objective
reality observe the lives of humans as well as other
creatures to see how they make a living; observe their
struggle to survive and finally you will come to the
conclusion that life exists due to necessity not due to a gift
- 69 -
from a beneficent master. All creatures need to be fit to exist;
there exists a struggle for survival on earth which kills the
very idea of beneficence or providence. In your experiment
you will continue to observe that only the powerful and
advanced creatures get to high positions or in other words get
to survive and live longer. The strongest or the wisest always
sit at the top and the rest are eliminated. Now, ask yourself
the question if only the fittest survive in any mammalian
colony including humans where the rich and gifted always
take their place at the highest order of society; which is also
true for other animals in the animal kingdom; then, where is
the providence in all of this? Where is your loving father who
designed the world for you to live without any strain? How
can he set a system of competition and brutality as the natural
order in life if he is supposed to be merciful and
beneficent? If life is designed why is there a competition to
survive?

Finally, you will come to the conclusion that our existence on

this tiny blue speck is marred by selfishness and competition
because you are not designed but adapted and evolved due to
necessity in an enabling environment due to the existence of
all necessary elements for life like a molten core which
enables earth to have a magnetic shield to foster life; a
perfect mass to create enough gravity to hold on to
atmosphere; a perfect distance from its perfect star to possess
a large volume of liquid water as an incubator for life.

So the last question after all your observation that might

come to your mind might be: should we take advantage of
the rise of life by promoting life extension, self-enhancement,
and self-sufficiency or should we continue on our path of
- 70 -
self-deception and mummery thinking that life is a design
and we just need to be embrace one of the belief systems on
the planet and go extinct? A wise man will always choose the
former; because it is sapient to always follow your
commonsense, verifiable as well as verified data rather than
cajole yourself with a system of hope it does not matter
whether it is supernatural or natural because systems of hope
cannot solve practical issues and explain practical
observations. They just suspend people in a state of delirium.

I therefore, think that we need not be afraid of nature and our

evolution we need to take advantage of probability that
created the universe and positioned our planet in the perfect
spot for us to evolve. Our anxiety over lack of control over
our experiences should not depress and motivate us to
establish mystical systems. We can at least manage the
macroscopic world governed by mathematical and physicals
laws by understanding how it works. As the wise statement
goesunderstanding nature is the beginning of all wisdom.
And true salvation could only come from the utilization of
this wisdom to ameliorate our conditions on earth to relieve
ourselves from any challenge posed by blind nature. which
we can apply to maximize our quality of life and make
ourselves live longer, travel faster and further in space-time,
develop other worlds, and most importantly change our
nature to evolve in to a higher form in order to adapt to any
environment in the multiverse to create blissful experiences
in objective reality .

Oh! Believer thou moste take advantage of

evolution in order to save thyself from
extinction.

- 71 -
* Note: I do not have anything against parents and guardians I am just
pointing out their error in embracing mysticism. I love my both parents
very much! There is no currency in the world that I could use to repay my
debt to my parents who looked after me when I couldnt and raised me
with love that nature instilled upon them

1.13 The idea and evidence of god must be clear to

everyone

Idealists and mystics have a very ridiculous manner of

reasoning; because their reasoning is not that much
cultivated by stating fallacious arguments like because
you have an idea of god then there must be a god There are
several ridiculous inferences and arguments that mystics
promote for the existence of supernatural entity
argument from design; argument from cosmology; arguments
from teleology and so forth ( read The God delusion by prof.
Dawkins chapter three for details) but I have said repeatedly
that the term supernatural by itself means atheism; because
the word super means beyond and natural means us and
when we put the words together we get a meaning which
translates into beyond us; which is the position of atheists
like myself who reject supernaturalism as an oxymoron; and
second just because I have an idea of the theory of
everything it does not mean it exists; for example I have an
idea of Homer Simpson, unicorns, vampires, and my
wedding with Britney Spears, my visit to Paris and other
dreams. Now are all these things real because I have an idea
of them? No, they are fictive characters and dreams! Now
any idea whatever it may be must be absolutely clear to all
of mankind; not just to sophisticated erudite men but to any
- 72 -
ordinary lay man; it can never be a mystery and accessible
only to few people; this rule applies to everything
including the theory of everything or in mystical terminology
god.

It must be rational and evident; crystal clear like iconic

monuments of the statue of liberty, the Eiffel tower, or
Borats unusual attire and iconic moustache that anybody
could see and recognize as a fact to be related with identity;
people would saylook there is the statue of liberty on an
island so that must be the United States; look there is the
Eiffel tower and this must be Paris; look there is person in
outdated attire and fancy moustache; so he has to be Borat;
so forth. Mystics have a very strange manner of reasoning
because the theory of everything lies in nature it can never be
outside itgod lays in nature; incompatible concepts get
established because we are fabulously ignorant about the
natural world and this ignorance is the root of all irrational
beliefs and dogmas that we behold.

The reason for people to indulge in turpitude rather than

fruitful and rational arguments is because as I said so many
times man is semi-rational the idea and processes of
rationalism is problematic to his inchoate rational faculty; he
finds it easy to burst in ragethan to forward cogent
arguments. Our nature is really messed up; which is why we
need self-enhancements to rectify and compensate our bestial
identity. We are really doomed when you observe the world
from a gloomy vantage point; our nature is messed up; we
are isolated at the mercy of our technologies; and time is
running out; the odds are piled up against us; and the fate of
humanity seems to be in a precarious situation.
- 73 -
The natural world is not a mystery; everything is a natural
process; even Jesus as modern day Apollo and a famous
superstitious toy from Brazil to South Korea himself is a
natural process; he was an ape like us and a natural organism;
there is no occult dimension and so on; even children might
inquire if something is occult; then, how can it be real i.e.
thing? Mysticism is a big nothing! Two opposing
dimensions create an absence of idea; nature is your god; you
should never be fooled by perplexing and reason paralyzing
arguments which prohibit you from free thought and
commonsense. Sometimes I think to myself even the name
Homo sapiens is misnomer; considering the level of
irrationality on the planet; starting from the days of the Plato
and his mystical madness to modern day advocates of
daydreaming and idealism like mystic Deepak Chopra. I
think humanity should be called Homo mystic this sounds
like a legitimate denomination; the deficits within human
nature should never be compensated with mysticism; but,
with technology; the part of the human lower self which is
leading to several irrational systems and vantage points must
be dealt with critically by self-augmentation and
improvement; whether we like it or not we are orphans in a
Cosmic desert to fend on our own; we should stop playing
with phantasms and attempt to understand the acute laws of
nature which determine the fate of humanity.

I think we must understand that if something is so mysterious

and unfathomable; then it literally can be translated to mean a
non-entity. If something is beyond you brains transducting
capability then it is a zero. Our feelings and emotions do not
dictate the truth but evidence and demonstration definitely
do; reality is independent from our bias, tenacity, and
- 74 -
interests. Just remember the fact that no evidence means that
it is a stratagem and a deception. This is the reason as I said
elsewhere that idealists tend to be totalitarian in their
discourse; they are obsessed with how people think and
attempt to play mind tricks on people by applying terrorism
as well as optimism rather than ebeism to carry their
arguments across; because their propositions do not have any
basis in reality; therefore the mind has to be abused by terror
and hope in order to influence and doctrinize it by mystical
fairytales.

Therefore, I think that people must understand the difference

between facts and fiction; skepticism and faith. A sacrifice of
your precious reason will eventually lead you into an abyss
and self-extinction; but skepticism and evidence will lead
you to self-existence. Defend your consciousness from abuse
and doctrinization by idealists and mystics in the meantime
augmenting your understanding of nature. Chimeras and
mysteriousness are signs of inane concepts and systems of
buffoonery.

1.14 The dialogue II

Q: What is the theory of everything?

A: We live in a universe where we are ignorant about more

than 90% of its constituent; which is now known to be dark;
notwithstanding this fact; mystical zealots tend to
capriciously ascend beyond nature as if it is possible to do so
and proclaim that the theory of everything is immaterial and
unnatural; mystics where wrong when they said that the earth
- 75 -
was flat; it was the center of the universe and when they also
said that the self or consciousness is a spirit; because it
turned out to be nothing but a symphony of brain waves
made up of subatomic particles. Hence, mystics have a
reputation for being on the wrong side of history. So we
know just less than 5% about our natural dimension; so how
can we possible formulate the theory of everything with such
a limited understanding of our cosmos at this stage? Hence,
first we need to understand nature as whole; then, we can go
on and formulate the theory of everything.

Q: Does god exist?

A: God is a mystical appellation for the theory of everything.

When you enunciate god you mean the theory of
everything in a mystical sense and the answer is yes, the
theory of everything exists; and it exists within the natural
world; but, no one has yet discovered and tested it
effectively. It may be explained by the String theory or any
other forth coming theory; which can explain our reality in a
succinct manner.

Q: What about the supernatural god?

A: The idea of super by itself disqualifies your inquiry.

You are implicitly proclaiming in your own question that it is
beyond your conception.

Q: You seem to suggest that nature is god? Are you a

pantheist?

A: Let me state my position in a vivid manner; I reject any

super natural notion; I know that nature comprises all and it

- 76 -
is alive; which makes me a hylozoist because I can see and
feel its actions; but, I have no proof that nature possesses a
mind at all. Hence, I consider the concepts of animism and
panpsychism as unproven hypothesis. Thus, I am agnostic
about the complete answer to our universe; when the future
generation reaches the stage of masterdom (complete
understanding of nature) then, humanity will be able to
formulate the total retort to our cosmos.

Q: What is your recommendation for the world?

A: Well, we know that nature is a totalitarian entity; because

even our thoughts and dreams are material. Hence, the
abstruse cults of mysticism and spiritualism themselves are
curbed within nature. Hence, I recommend rationalism and
more serious investigation of the natural world in order to
formulate the theory of everything to settle all disputes in
philosophy.

Q: What do you think is the real threat to humanity?

A: Superstition, mysticism, irrationality, and especially

idealism.

Q: What seems to be the source of all problems in the world?

A: We live in a world of competing states and individuals for

survival, dominance and glory. All this occurs due the design
of man; who is a semi-rational and bestial animal; thus, the
problem lies in the very fact that man is an animal and a
semi-rational organism. This problem of bestiality and
irrationality must be eliminated altogether in order to be
replaced by a civil and rational self as well as a better design.

- 77 -
Man is no different than a dog that marks his territory;
practices lewd or salacity; explodes in rage; and gets into
sanguine skirmishes with other organisms in order to
maintain his selfish interests. The history of our world
starting from our ancestors who were hunters and gatherers
to the modern day humans history is marred by conflicts and
struggle for survival as well as dominance and glory. This
status quo will proceed into the future; if we leave human
nature as it is; Americans will continue to be in a struggle
and competition with the Russians to expand their territory
and global leadership; Jews will continue to be in struggle
with the Arabs; Sunnis will continue their abhorrence for
Shias; animals will continue to be slaughtered for food;
irrational systems and many branches of idealism like
biocentrism, the law of attraction and several other
pseudo sciences will continue to emerge throughout the
future as long as human bestiality and irrationality are left
intact.

Q: So you are forwarding self-enhancement as the ultimate

solution to the world?

A: Yes! I believe transcending human nature is the cure to

the world; people who formulated the idea of transhumanism
are sapient individuals; who deserve not just applause but
also funding for their research in bringing about the
dissolution of human bestiality.

Q: Transcending humanity will not happen overnight; it will

take several years; hence, how can we deal with the world in
the meantime?

- 78 -
A: Children must be thought that they are the work of nature;
and nature is the supreme entity; they must be encouraged as
much as possible to employ reason in their daily lives and
experiences suppressing bestiality as much as possible
even though their nature might not allow it. They must
practice civility and rationality until the technology arrives to
practically transform their frail reason faculty into a higher
form.

Q: Are you optimistic about the human race?

A: Well, mankind accomplished great feats in just a couple

of millennium like establishing natural philosophy and
landing on the moon as well as being the first animal to
possess such a detail and terse knowledge of the cosmos;
even though his animal instincts sometimes drag him in to an
abyss; he most often tend to surpass his lower self to
accomplish great deeds; so I choose to be optimistic about
our future.

Q: Finally, do you have any messages and last statements?

A: Yes! Keep on investigating nature because, the theory

of everything is in the natural world. In order, for this to
befall we need to augment the human rational faculty in the
cortex via chemically or mechanically so that it will possible
for it to manage a voluminous amount of calculations and
ingenuity than its current capacity.

- 79 -
1.15 Who is the real pagan?

Supernaturalists pride themselves by scorning and elevating

themselves above realists and naturalists that they are
following the righteous path towards redemption. They fool
themselves by creating unintelligible chimeras and assume
that they have discovered the occult dimension of
immateriality. They deject the true determiner of their very
existence; because, they state that nature does not have a
face; so it cannot be a nominee for the title of the supreme
entity; they accuse others of paganism; but at this very stage
we are compelled to inquire the question; who is the real
pagan? A man who worships and reveres natural forces
whose effects he can see and feel on the ground or the
person who adulates facetious inert and mute toys like the
cross, kbba or the statue of Ganesh draped in opulence;
whose effects he can never observe? What we can say for the
pantheist is that he is absolutely sensible; at least he is not
delusional; he can observe his creator in action
determining his life; but for the supernaturlaists he seems like
a bewildered man who builds ridiculous toys and phantoms
borrowed from nature to represent the face of his so called
supernatural god which he says is the author of nature; where
in fact as soon he illustrates or vociferates the qualities of his
supernatural entity; we understand that this supernatural
being is the creation of his own mind. Therefore,
supernaturalists are the real pagans; nature is the real god;
naturalists and realists are on the righteous path.

Supernaturalism is inundated in idolatry, puerile ceremonies,

sadistic rituals, and inane sacrifices. They are in no position
to accuse others of paganism; while, they are inundated in it
- 80 -
themselves; because, it will be an irony. If you observe any
supernatural cult you will notice that they are an organized
system of paganism; who, adulate statues made up of stones
and wood enveloped by irrational zealotry; they are the
advocates of repulsive mystical practices which augment the
infirmity of men rather than entail salubrity. They have a
fetish for unintelligible and intermingled material statues;
whose, effects can never be witnessed; Supernaturalism is
really the result of mans super weak and flimsy rational
faculty; evolution has left us with a very feeble reasoning
power which is really unfortunate and is therefore
responsible for the many irrational systems that we witness
on the ground. This is the reason why self-enhancement
becomes mandatory in order to save mankind form itself.
Supernaturalists are not by part to blame for what they are
committing on the ground because they are functioning
according to the very design they are meant to function;
nature is to blame here for her imperfect design; Hence, we
need to fix what nature has spoiled in order to end
supernatural paganism.

The life of a naturalist and a realist is a life of commonsense

and sensibility; he perlustrates reality in order to discern what
is the prime cause of all causes based on testing and
evidence. Countless observations and experiments have
shown that nature is all there is; it is the only dimension; it is
uncreatable and indestructible; which is responsible for all
manifestations in the universe; if you disagree then you must
provide your evidence so that I can change my mind any
time; but as an advice if you want to understand the
determining nature of nature itself just observe your
experiences in your daily life i.e. your attitude, & mood
- 81 -
entailing different outcomes based on their state in your
experiences in life. In short, the forces of nature are
responsible for it all.

Naturalists and realists are on the right direction because it is

prudent to always follow what is testable and demonstrable
than imaginary cults of idealism and its several branches
where religion is included. It is salutary for our minds, our
emotions and our physical bodies to be realists; because, it
defends our buxom and existence from bane by unverified
claims and indemonstrable delusions. To be a realist is a
blessing; to embrace evidence based existence is a shield
against self-extinction promoted by the suffering and death
loving cult of supernatural paganism.

Therefore, supernaturalists are in no position to accuse

realists and naturalists of paganism; while, they hold the
monopoly in the adulation, construction, and supplication of
superstitious toys of various kinds made form dead animals
and mute boulders which are more helpless than their
creators. Sometimes I think to myself; even a pantheist can
be forgiven if he worshiped the sun; because, at least he is
barking at the right tree; he has identified the right supreme
force! Even though, his mystical tendency in engagement
with nature may be a subject to criticism; because mysticism
never works in our engagement with nature; but, rationalism
does; hence, he will be advised to put his hands apart and
stand up straight from where he was kneeling on the ground
in order to pick up a pen and a piece of paper from his shelf
to do some observations and calculations about the
movement, intensity, and size of the sun using his rational
mind in order to acquire some understanding about our solar
- 82 -
system; and the processes of photosynthesis to feed himself
and his fellow humans by developing better crops and
systems of agriculture; rather than shouting his lungs out in
adulation and crying his eyes out in reverence to the sun;
which will be a very silly endeavor. Hence, the fact that
naturalists and realists recognize only nature as the sole
metaphysical truth can only make them prudent and sensible
beings directed only by reason and evidence.

1.16 The dialogue-IV

Q: What are the branches of mysticism?

A: It basically has two branches supernatural mysticism and

natural mysticism

Q: What creates mysticism?

A: The abhorable design of man who is a mixture of

mediocre intelligence and a savage beast. This fact will
create the limitations of the human brain capacity which is
responsible for all complains. This is the reason why most
often people get their metaphysics right and their
epistemology wrong or vise versa. As an example we can see
supernatural mysticism which is both terribly wrong in
metaphysics as well as epistemology but natural mysticism is
at least metaphysically right because they embrace natural
absolutism; but their method of engaging with nature is
wrong. Hence, natural mysticism can be tolerated but should
never be encouraged.

- 83 -
Q: What is the right epistemological and metaphysical
direction?

A: Pure reason (manner of engaging with nature) and

naturalism (the manner of reality)

Q: What fosters mysticism?

A: Naivety, ignorance and the limited human cortex.

Q: What is the long term and short term threats of

mysticism?

A: In general, mysticism is a degrading force; it destroys all

branches of hedonism leading to self-extinction rather than
self-existence.

Q: What is the solution for eradicating all branches of

mysticism?

A: I think one solution can be redesigning the human species

purely on rational grounds without any emotive and bestial
nature with a higher cognitive capability which reduces the
need for metaphysical as well as epistemological digressions.

Q: Do you think there is a free will?

A: All creatures behave in accordance with their design.

Their design determines their behavior; thus, free will does
not exist. All creatures are determined by their physio-
chemistry.

Q: Many mystics nowadays think that mysticism is necessary

either to establish order, morality, and consolation in a
society. What do you say to that argument?
- 84 -
A: The only thing mysticism is good at establishing is
nothing but disorder in peoples mental, emotional, physical,
social and economic wellbeing. I have already mentioned
why mysticism can never be the source of morality a
creature with canines and balls is not designed to be ethical
he is designed to be a beast. Thus, clothing him with opulent
spiritual attire can never make him moral or the model of the
ideal character. Man as a beast must be allowed to evolve
into a higher form free from bestiality and ill design; it is
only then that we will have the ethical and moral creature
that we are looking for; which makes transhumanism a
legitimate direction. Now, consolation comes after calamity
and all calamities occur due to mans limitationsthat
mysticism sustains and obstructs from being purged. So
mysticism sustains the perpetual cycle between limitation
and calamity.

Q: If this is so what is the cure for humanity is general?

A: Self-existence by means of pure reason.

1.17 The folly and stratagem of 'life beyond the grave'

Most often people are afraid of something that they are

incapable of seeing rather than what they are capable of
seeing right before their eyes. This technique of abusing the
human mind has been utilized effectively by mystics and all
advocates of suffering and death. We have been bombarded
since childhood at the time where our brains were immature

- 85 -
to distinguish the difference between sophistry and
sincerityas well as impostors and liberators .We have
been ordered to absorb the fallacious doctrines and never
doubt the sophistry of mystics about the so called 'after life'
stratagem.

Most forms of mysticisms have adopted this concept of life

after death; the ancient Egyptian religion, The Romans, The
Greeks, eastern religions and other mystics. But of course,
the theory of after life is fictive, attempting to scare of
humanity into submission to a particular agenda. The fictive
tale of afterlife is no different than the fictiveness of Homer
Simpson or the master scarecrow in Theo-mythologythe
devil. Just think of the devil as a fictional character like Hell
boy in the movie. The most important idea to notice here is
that mystics employ what I call the invisible syndrome;
which, means that people are more scared of not just what
they do not see; but, what they are incapable of seeing like
the afterlife, the devil or god. Why? Because they do not
exist! Non-entities are more frightening than self-evident
dangers.

Let me help you in understanding this concept much better;

can you disprove the existence of Boggy man or of my
invisible girl friend? Yes, mind twisting stuff; right? Yes, this
is the very game played by mystics by their entire fictive
theory; because, honestly I can never prove the existence of a
fictional character that I just invented which exists only in
my mind. How can you possibly know what I am dreaming?
Therefore, mystics utilize this snare argument to entrap
pseudoscience victims.

- 86 -
The only life in the grave is the life of microbes and worms.
No sage rational man is expected to be convinced by the
admonishing remarks of impostors. The entire life processes
on earth seem like the evolution of god rather than the
process of deportation to a god into some unknowable
dimension. The reason why this dimension is unknowable is
because it only exists in the reveries and fancies of mystics in
their thick heads. At this very point I do not want to be
misconstrued when I am inscribing very perlustrative
arguments about mystics that I have answer for the theory of
everything I do not .What I am trying to express is that the
theories and concepts promoted by mystics is erroneous and
an absolute bunk!

Mysticism is not the theory of everything! The theory of

everything is still unknown. It is not Shiva, Buddha, or
Marduk! The theory of everything is still out there for us to
discover and comprehend. As I always state in my articles
that over and over again our finite intelligence is our biggest
disadvantage which creates the evil triangle which are the
society, the state and the church (mysticism) confining the
individual in a bastille of great distress.

Amystology strives to bring an end to this finite intelligence

by ushering in the stage of masterdom through self-
enhancement; bring about, the desinence of the state, society
and the church (mysticism). At the stage of masterdom (i.e.
omnipotence) man will become self-sufficient and eventually
self-existent. Therefore, enemy number one is the limited
human intelligence.

- 87 -
Mysticism is established on the foundation of the invisible
syndrome. A house erected on the fears of people. A house
erected on sabotaging the already weak human intelligence.
And nothing paralyzes the human brain than irrationality and
terrorism. The horrors of the so called afterlife are filled with
heinous terror of sadism and savagery in ancient Egyptian or
Islamic mythology for example. In mysticism nothing more
is held in high esteem than a disordered mind without reason
and health. The more terrorized and dysfunctional a mind
becomes the more he is considered close to 'heaven'.
Therefore, mysticism is a cult of sufferphilic (misery loving)
and death obsessed lunatics.

In opposition to this madness amystology, promotes

eternal life right here within eternal nature; which, is so real.
A utopia that might be created if man attains masterdom
(omnipotence) while self-enhancing. A utopia that man was
craving for; ever since, he set his bipedal foot on the ground
down, from the trees .But, which unfortunately all doctrines
have failed to achieve.

In addition, to put things into context the lie of after life has
never encouraged or restricted anyone from committing
good; if you disagree then lets observe the so called holy men
acting like lustful beasts violating young men and women;
the promise of a terrifying punishment in the afterlife did not
restrain the 'holiest of the holy' and their raging hormones.
What restrains and determine men are the laws of the natural
world; the laws of physics and chemistry which govern the
universe. One cannot wish to be outside nature even in his
dreams; let alone, in practice. Therefore, the root of all evils
lies in the limitations of human intelligence; which is
- 88 -
creating all types of superstitious dogmas, and pseudo
sciences as well as societies and states. The fairytale fable of
afterlife which is included in mysticism manifests due to this
very fact. Hence, on my part I will advocate amystology
whether or not the technology for creating a super intelligent
human exists or not; because I believe that my advocacy will
eventually encourage people to get busy into figuring out the
formulas and blueprints for making the dream of masterdom
and self-existence a reality; because, I believe that self-
existence is the only solution to the human condition.

1.18 Is there a difference between Apollo and Jesus?

Juno and Mary? Vishnu and Jupiter? Amun and Allah?
Ancient religions of the Greeks, Romans, Egyptians and
todays religions? Is there a specially right version of
mysticism?

Mysticism throughout the ages is identicalit does not

matter what form it takes i.e. language and culture. The gods
of ancient Greeks and Romans are as manmade as the
god/Goddesses of todays Christians and Muslims utterly
powerless fictive creatures like their counterparts.

Just as Jesus of our time is revered and worshiped by

millions throughout the world so was the marble statue of
Jupiter and Juno. The fact that mystics are arrogant about
their belief or their biased attitude that their mystical toys are
special from other mystics cannot make them any different.
The fact that Christian mysticism insults and degrades
ancient mystics with derisive terms like pagans and heretics

- 89 -
does not make their version of mysticism superior or
veracious.

Islamic mysticism, Christian mysticism, Greek mysticism,

Roman mysticism, Buddhist mysticism, Hindu mysticism,
Zoroastrian mysticism, Jewish mysticism, are all one and the
same notwithstanding the era they were invented or
practiced. They are all sham arts of self-deception.

Mysticism in general does not matter when and in which

culture it was practiced it is all one and the same the
ancient religion of the Hittites is in no manner different from
todays Christianity or Islam. All religions it does not matter
where i.e. in which culture and in what era i.e. time they
appear are all fiction. Goddess Juno is no more inferior or
superior to Goddess Mary of Christianity; God Amun of the
Egyptians is no different from God Allah of the Arabs. They
are all mythology created by people to relieve themselves the
anxiety and fear of the unknown as well as the burden of the
insurmountable.

Mystics slaughter each other accusing one another of

polytheism, heresy, and infidelity. Forcing one another to
embrace their own Gods as the righteous ones; Sunnis accuse
Shias of heresy and vice versa; orthodox Christians accuse
Protestants as heretics and so on. Therefore, mere belief by
itself wont legitimize an individual. Everyone has to fool
himself precisely according to the prescription of respective
mystics and their inventions. Every branch of mystical school
expects us to embrace their God which they invented and
carved out of piles of clay by their whim.

- 90 -
It is really ridiculous to see adults in turpitude insulting and
cursing one another for not playing with the same toys as
another; they behave like little children quarreling on a
playground. Mythological literatures like the Theogony,
Bible, Veda and the Quran are the diaries and brain children
of poets, novelists.

Considering these facts the correct version of Genesis 1:1

should have read as In the beginning Man created God and
religion. Not written as In the beginning God created the
heavens and earth. Genesis 1:26 should have read as
Then man said: let us make God in our own image
according to our likeness..- Not written as Then God
said: let us make man in our own image according to our
likeness.. and lastly Genesis 1:27 should have read And
man went on to create God in his image, in his image he
created him; male and female he created them-Not written
as And God went on to create the man in his image, in
Gods image he created him; male and female he created
them The Theogony is no different from the Bible, Veda, or
the Quran they are all layers of fiction and mythology. The
outrage of mystics by these arguments does make their
position any apodictic.

Believers are the slaves of novelists and impostors who

would love to build an empire on the corpses of their
hoodwinked, deluded, and enslaved identity. The glory and
numerousity of their gullible army is more significant to
them than natural truths.

The most important issue that people must understand

throughout the ages is that mysticism is all and the same in

- 91 -
whatever culture it emanates from; in what language it is
written; in what era it is invented. Hence, we should not fool
ourselves that our version of mysticism or religion is the
righteous and superior one. None of them are; they are all
bunk.

Apollo was the God of music, poetry, art, oracles, archery,

plague, medicine, sun, light and knowledge. He was one of
the 12 important Olympian deities in Greek mythology i.e.
Zeus, Hera, Poseidon, Demeter, Athena, Apollo, Artemis,
Ares, Aphrodite, Hephaestus, Hermes and either Hestia or
Dionysus.

Jesus on the other hand is considered by Christians as a

healer, savior and so forth with the same attributes entailed to
Apollo as a God of medicine. Juno used to be the Goddess of
marriage and Childbirth in ancient Roman religion just as
Mary is considered as a deity supplicated in childbirth in
todays Christian mythology within Orthodox Christianity.

Vishnu as the most significant deity in Hinduism is

considered as the protector just as Jupiter is considered as
the guardian of the state. The Trimurti or trinity in Hinduism
of Brahma, Vishnu and Shiva is not in any way different
from the trinity of the father, the Son and the Holy Spirit of
Christian mythology. The hymns and poems of Hesiod and
Homer are no more different than the hymns and poems of
Muhammads Quran.

The list of God names enumerating the qualities of Gods like

the 99 names attributed to the God of the Arabs i.e. Allah is
no more different than the 108 names and titles of Krishna
from the Gaudiya Vaishnavism tradition or with The 7 names
- 92 -
of God in rabbinic Judaism. What we can observe from this
phenomenon is that mysticism is identical throughout the
diverse cultures and traditions of humanity.

It is possible to build an empire based on mythology and

fiction inhabited by mental patients if the cozener is a
misanthrope who is preoccupied with his fame than the
wellbeing of humanity and the discovery of natural truths.

Amystology as a rejection of mysticism founded on the

pillars reason and evidence provides you with the shield to
defend yourself against delusion and to categorize fiction as
fiction; facts as facts accordingly. It is the best state of mind
it liberates you from the snare of mysticism which promotes
fiction as fact which is in plain terms an act of inducing
delusion! It gives you a perspective and vantage point
where you can figure out what is true and what is inane. It
empowers you with reason to perlustrate theories and claims
in order to maintain your salubrity. It shows you that there is
absolutely no difference between the gods of the ancient and
the Gods of the present; the myths of the past and the myths
of the present.

1.19 Spiritualism never works but intelligent design does

Leaders and politicians had always firmly asserted that

spiritualism is an indispensible tool in a society to govern and
control its inhabitants. They firmly believed, vociferated or
implied that man as a potentially dangerous and unstable
bestial creature must be made sick into a mental patient in
order to be controlled. Spiritualism must act as a leash
- 93 -
restraining the human passion for maintaining the integrity of
the so called society.

But for any rational observer this definitely sounds

incoherent with reality. If we observe spiritualism in action in
the most spiritual part of the globe i.e. Jerusalem which is
said to be the so called melting pot of 'peaceful spiritualism';
we fathom that it is the most turbulent and sanguine place on
earth ! If spiritualism had any benefit, it would have worked
for Jerusalem. If it had any soothing effect on humanity it
would have calmed the Middle East which is the most
spiritually diverse and saturated place on earth. We probably
never miss a day on TV news about violence in Jerusalem or
the Middle East.

Human behavior emanates from the human design. Hence, if

it is necessary to alter human behavior; to purge it from
negative traits, the only and exclusive manner to do it is
through human enhancement and modification of his design
into a better and higher being free from irrationality,
pugnacity, ignoramity, salacity and bestiality. This can only
be possible through science and technology. No
accomplished philosophy, bill of rights, UN charter on the
declaration of human rights and democratic rights etc. can
achieve this goal and usher in the era of global peace and
bliss! These plausibly astonishing regulas can never alter
what is in our bestial genes! .Hence, are void of efficacy. In
order to bring about true change we must employ intelligent
design to enhance and modify human nature and the natural
order.

- 94 -
Spiritualism rather than restricting spiritualists, places them
on trial for heinous crimes like genocide and sexual violence;
revered spiritualists falling into gaucheries for the crimes that
they proscribe their dube followers from committing.
Spiritualism is incapable of altering and modifing human
nature. How can a superficial system of regulas alter what
has been set in place in the human genome by nature? It is an
inane system void of results enveloped by poetry,
sensationalism and pipe line promises. What spiritualism is
efficient at doing is; destroying the mental and physical
salubrity of precious man. Spiritualism is not just a
pseudoscience without substance but has been a proven
legalized madness.

In order for world peace and serenity first we must assert two
important points:

1-Natural absolutism: That nature is the exclusive

metaphysical entity in existence; never created or pending to
be destroyed.

2-Intelligent design: In order to improve not just the human

condition but other natural entities beyond the observer we
must employ science and technology as a systematic study
and manipulation of exclusive nature.

These above mentioned two points are the two important

points which are going to make our world a better place.
Now the question might arise that what should be the next
human design and natural order? This I believe is a very
contentious issue .Who gets to decide who becomes what?
Who gets to decide what type of cyborg one has to be? Who
gets to decide what type of natural order we should live in?
- 95 -
My answer to these questions is personal selection: people
choose what type of design that they want to be and what
type of natural order they want to live in. I think it is much
better to argue over science than on fiction. We can have a
civil debate, conversation on how to set the next natural
order. But what is certain is that the current bestial natural
order must be changed.

A better, smarter and civil natural order must be set by

humans rectifying what blind nature decreed. Humans must
be intergalactic and possibly even inter universal beings with
pansophy and omnipotence. In order to materialize this goal;
people must commence self-modification and purging before
time runs out and the sun cremates us. The metamorphosis of
the universe i.e. man must take his legitimate and higher
place in nature. He needs to be an omniscient and omnipotent
being that he deserves to be liberating himself from his
bestial lower self.

An overwhelming attention and funding must go into science

and technology in order to bring this dream into reality. The
current progress of science is rapid and plausible but more
work needs to be done in order to motivate children into the
STEM fields of education and keep them far away from
pseudo sciences. Science is super hard and may be this is the
reason that teenagers mostly choose some sort of fine arts
over mathematics and engineering.

Our inchoate intelligence is becoming a culprit in our

downfall and extinction. But! I have hope that humanity will
acquire the fortitude to engage naturalism and emancipate
himself from pseudo sciences like spiritualism to realize that

- 96 -
he is the rightful heir of the Cosmos and it is up for grabs.
The rise of pseudo sciences augment human suffering and the
rise of eusciences like naturalism and intelligent design
augment human bliss.

If we can motivate children by the thrill of science and

technology rather than the evils and bane of pseudo sciences
like spiritualism we can make the world a better place. May
be we should build an AI to cogitate over science if
humans are too lazy to do it and then feed the outcome to
humans to improve their condition.

Politicians rather than being married to baneful spiritualism

they should create unbreakable union with science which
holds all the solutions to our problems and answers to our
questions. They must help in promulgating conducive
policies to further research and development which will
benefit all of humanity in creating wealth, curing diseases
and extending life spans in addition to enhancing humans.

I have hope that into the future man armed by reason and
consulting evidence will have the zest and capability to
manipulate nature through science as he pleases and be her
master rather than her slave.

Technology makes everything possible!

- 97 -
1.20 All pseudosciences are the ignorance of natural
causes devised to deceive and ensnare mankind to a
particular interest.

It does not matter whether it is the string theory, the

evolutionary theory or the god theory all claims must satisfy
two criteria reason and evidence i.e. they have to be
consistent and evident. Nothing must be taken for granted
without scrutiny and examination on trust, faith or authority.
Because all natural causes are capable of being verified. The
inability and incapability to demonstrate and support ones
claims with irrefragable consistent evidence due to the
intricate nature of reality is the very factor which is creating
these avalanches of pseudo sciences.

May be it is because our monkey brain has not fully matured

enough into an all capable agency with the capabilities to
comprehend the nature of nature. A hypothesis or theory
which is not sensible even worse which tells us to suspend
our intellect because we cannot understand it with our
puny mind is to suggest to not discern anything at all. Some
of the zealots of pseudoscience even employ terror to force
us to accept their claims. Some tell us that we just need to
have hope and evidence is on its way and their claims will
soon be substantiated.

So there are individuals who tell us to suspend our intellect

and abandon our reason altogether and wonder like a
zombie because reason cannot discern their concept or
theory. If reason cant comprehend their concepts then their
theory is not made for man! Can we honestly imagine a
human being without reason driven just by instincts and

- 98 -
caprice? If this is their request then they are ordering us to
reduce ourselves below the levels of animals who in fact
have a strong sense of self-preservation. We must never
forget that reason is mans precious, inalienable and
indispensible possession. There is no knowledge beyond
reason. It is only those who are indolent sham theoreticians
who lack the ability to provide evidence who paint a target
mark on reason. And next there are claimants who are
employing terror to drive their theory down our throats.
Traumatizing our minds to subjugation through terrorism.
And finally we have those theoreticians who assure us that
the evidence for their claims is in the pipe line we just need
to have hope and do as we are told.

The lack of consistency and confirmation renders any theory

factitious. Therefore, we should never submit to irreason,
fear or hope. Always stick to the foundations of truth i.e.
reason and evidence. The incapability of theoreticians to
provide evidence is not our problem and responsibility it is
their burden. As it is impossible to conceive a human without
reason it is also impossible to conceive the truth without
evidence.

Some people might argue why we should make rationalism

and empiricism as our sole epistemological theories? And the
answer is simple.

The only defense we have against impostors is skepticism

and the righteous path of infidelism notwithstanding their
short comings. I say short comings because I am lamenting
the weaknesses of the human brain which can be deceived by
distorted perceptions as in illusion trickery. We do not have

- 99 -
an option but to stick with our imperfect brain with all its
weaknesses and embrace rationalism and empiricism whether
the data presented to us through our senses is distorted on
purpose to give us erroneous concepts or not we must imbibe
reality. The presence of an imperfect perceiver cannot make
reality inauthentic.

To abandon rationalism and empiricism to seek knowledge

via short cuts like intuitionism will only short circuit our
brain these actions will not further our cause it will further
entangle our concepts and complicate our understanding of
existence. The desertion of realism for idealism will only
throw us in to the world of the invalid. The world of words
without meanings subjects without objects, theories without
substance, and concepts without percepts.

We must never abandon natures despite our weakness in our

material brain in comprehending nature totally. We must
always employ rationalism and empiricism in our
engagement with reality despite our fully undeveloped
capabilitiesbecause frankly we dont have an alternative.

All pseudo sciences are the rejection of reality unless

otherwise they end up substantiating their claims. They make
philosophy a crime and a dirty word; independent thought an
imaginable vice and blasphemy which should never be
attempted so that we can be the perfect idiotic unempowered
and tamed subjects to their tommyrot theories.

They denominate criticality as immoral, empowerment

illegal; individuality a corruption, freedom of thought a
perversion. Whereas, faith, indifference, collectivism,
totalitarianism the awed and venetated virtues. If this is the
- 100 -
case then pseudoscientists are not asking us to accept a
theory but to accept thralldom and death.

Therefore, pseudoscience whether spiritual or material is not

for you or for me it is a slavery to nonsense and to peoples
ambition. Let them have their deluded and sensationalistic
army by their side we will have reason and evidence by our
side; let them chase after the riches of the planet we will
chase after the true nature of reality; let them have their
empire of gullibles we will have our empire of sensible men;
let them have their names carved on stone revered by their
disoriented subjects we will have the truth carved on stone
cogitated by freethinkers throughout history.

Let them satisfy their urge of imperial domination; we will

satisfy our urge of truth identification; let them express their
misanthropy through their sadistic laws we will express our
philanthropy through our humanitarian laws; let them satisfy
their urge of driving man of a cliff we will satisfy our urge
of self-preservation; let them have their chance at
hoodwinking humanity; we will have our chance of
empowering humanity.

Free thought is the mother of all inventions. It is only when

people are free and endowed with pre-option that they can
reach their maximum potential. When man breaks off the
fetters of collectivism; that is when he can develop and
prosper. It is only when laissez-faire but not anarchy is
accepted as a concept that man becomes the master of his
accomplishments.

The very fact that pseudoscientists are totalitarian and not

willing to give us the right of pre-option is an attestment by
- 101 -
itself that their theory is sham and inane designed to entrap as
many subjects as possible so that they can roar in zeal the cry
of a conqueror by placing their foot on subjugated bodies.

1.21 Godcraft: An inquiry into the reasons of God

making. Why does man create something higher than
himself?

What creates gods? Why do people create gods? What

facilitates their invention? These questions are sensible
questions and the answers are two very important points it is
either the inability to understand reality (nonscience) or the
incapability to influence reality (impotence). Therefore, the
incapability to understand reality entails an inability to
influence reality. Hence, ignorance entails desperation,
perplexion and hopelessness which give birth to superstition,
mysticism and in general to pseudosciences. Which, we can
consider as a perpetuating loop of labyrinth which can only
be broken by intelgnos (natural understanding).

Another reason might be due to the fact that, humans are

obsessed in seeing themselves in nature. When they wake up
in the morning to a beautiful sunny day they see a provident
sun with a smile on its face; when they get melanoma from
that very same sun they see an improvident sun with a frown
on its face. Hence, they end up perceiving a nature operating
based on human traits rather than a nature operating based on
laws. This erroneous metaphysical vantage point and
perspective in addition to what has been mentioned above is
what gives birth to gods and superstition.

- 102 -
Therefore, based on this fact many personified gods like
Apollo, Gnowee, Malakbel, Nanauatzin, Amun, Ra and
others were born to the dismay of mankind and the bloodbath
that would ensue among several superstitious factions. It is
this erroneous personification of natural forces which has and
is creating all this mayhem and bloodbath among races, tribes
and states among all religions and pseudosciences.

We are part of a fabric called nature. We are interwoven in

the intricate processes of the natural world. It is absolutely
impossible for us to escape nature even with our imagination
and be supernaturalists of some sort.

Because supernatural entities are unknowable to our natural

mind it does not matter how hard we labor. Whatever,
gods we create will be made up of natural matter and epithets
borrowed from material entities. The God of the Christians
for example is called 'The father' with a craving for sex like
an animal to have a son called Jesus. But paternity and lust
are human attributes; Lord Ganesh is made up of elephant
and human body parts; if we read the Quran God Allah of the
Arabs is seen to be angry and vindictive in several of the
verses, again getting angry and being vindictive is still a
human nature. Satan which is a scarecrow in monotheistic
pseudo sciences is illustrated as a heinous animal which has a
human torso, bat wings, lower limbs, horns and tail from an
Ox. These body parts are stolen from natural entities.
Therefore, it is absolutely impossible for us to even imagine
unnatural entities.

To a mind inundated in pseudo-nonsense what has been

written hitherto might sound perplexing and incredible. So

- 103 -
lets go back in history to ancient mysticism in order to
understand the positions of the current state of all mysticisms
and pseudo sciences. Whether, it is Christianity, Islam or any
other mythological establishment.

If we go further back in history to ancient Mesopotamia

we discover they had numerous Gods and Goddesses due to
the profound ignorance of the natural world at that time. For
example, to create a comparison they had a God called Anu
who is supposed to be a 'sky father', king of the Gods similar
with the 'loving father' of Christian mythology today.

As a good example, let us mention ancient texts which come

before the Bible and the Quran, like the epics of Ziusudra,
Gilgamesh and Atrahasis. In these ancient Mesopotamian
clay tablets we find the primordial source of mythology and
fiction for the succeeding literatures of fiction like the Bible
and the Quran. Flood stories are mentioned in these clay
tablets where an angry deity provides retribution by floods.
Now ask yourself and take a wild guess where today's
mythological institutions got their subject matter and
inspiration to write their own fictional stories which is either
identical or almost identical to these ancient Mesopotamian
mythical stories which precede them? Unless otherwise they
are plagiary of these literatures.

If you read about ancient Egyptian mythology and religion

the fables about afterlife, the rules laid out for 'morality' is
very much similar in some cases it is even identical to the
fables of afterlife and promises of restitution in Christian
mythology and Islamic mythology. You can compare for
example the 42 commandments in Egyptian mythology with

- 104 -
that of the 10 commandments in Christian mythology; the
prosecution of the dead in after life in Egyptian mythology
with that of Islamic mythology.

Furthermore, other mythological establishments which came

after the ancient Egyptians like the Romans for example, had
very much similar systems of mysticism they had Gods and
Goddesses God for agriculture and even had a God for door
hinges! And the Mesopotamians had a God for cattle! Called
Lahar which is supposed to be a protector and augmenter of
veterinarian fertility.

Fortunately, in some cases eventually these Gods will be

discarded to be replaced by intelgnos. God Lahar will be
replaced by veterinarian science, god Saturn will be replaced
by agricultural science. The cult of God Apollo will be
replaced by solar physics and so forth according to the
progress of human intelgnos.

To repeat what has been said elsewheregodcraft and

mythology first and for most are the results of profound
ignorance of nature. Hence, the more Gods you create the
more ignorant you are about the causes for the natural
manifestations you behold. The less God you create the less
you are ignorant about the natural world. The progress of
man from polytheism to atheism by itself can be forwarded
as an evidence for this intellectual progress in discerning the
causes of manifestations around him.

Therefore, as I may have described elsewhere the root of all

evil is man's lack of omniscience. This lack of omniscience
forces man to create something higher than himself whether,
it is a bogus law or a bogus god and establish a system of
- 105 -
mythology. This action does not augment his callow
intelligence or relieve his challenges.

Infect, mysticism, superstition and supernaturalism are

begotten due to the intelligence deficit of man. These systems
exasperate and plunge man into even more misery and
tribulation i.e. terrorism, genocide (religious cleansing),
deaths due to pseudo-medicine, crusades, jihads, mental and
physical ailments due to pseudo sciences are among just the
few societal ills man's nescience creates.

Therefore, in order to solve all of humanities challenges, first

we need to understand the problem which is as discussed
above the lack of man's omniscience. When man becomes
omniscient he will become self-sufficient, when man
becomes self-sufficient he will be self-existent. Hence,
without implementing the above mentioned sequences of
strategy I believe there will be no solution to the suffering of
mankind.

Finally, to conclude this article, we can use the term

omniscience interchangeably with masterdom because both
have the same meaning. The stage of masterdom which is the
ultimate destination of amystology. Every man on earth has a
potential to be a super being. If he is liberated from
nonscience (limited intelligence) and possesses an omniscient
mind. It is only here at this stage that man stops godcraft
(creating Gods and pseudosciences) and comprehends nature
totally to amend his condition as he pleases.

Godcraft and pseudoscience creation are the

results of our weak intelligence!

- 106 -
1.22 The law of attraction: yet another branch of
idealism and pseudoscience

The concept of idealism stated plain and simple is that the

human consciousness not just can but is the creator of reality.

But when we analyze the term consciousness and reality we

understand that consciousness is a passive terminology and a
passive object whereas, reality is an active term and an active
object where the consciousness embraces the imprinting of
perceptions and reality does the generation and creation of
perceptions. Hence, reality is the creator of the consciousness
not the other way around.

For those who have seen the video or read the book called
The secret which promotes material idealism by stating that
there is a law which responds to our thoughts and
feelings depending on their nature i.e. whether they are
pleasant or nocuous. Hence, their consequences on the
ground manifest accordingly.

Therefore, by controlling our thoughts and feelings we can

control experience or reality. The famous example in the
video was that of Gini who says Your wish is my
command. like an eight year old girl we just have to make a
wish list demanding what we want. If idealism worked our
universe would have been just the way we wanted it to be
a utopia just by the dint of our wishes; idealists are seeking
an absolute knowledge and trying to formulate an ideal
theory as an explanation for metaphysics.

Spiritual idealists look for an ideal spirit and material

idealists seek an ideal law. There is nothing wrong with
- 107 -
hypothesis and theories but verification and substantiation is
always mandatory and falls as a burden on the speculator. I
do not have any problem if a spirit or an ideal law was
discovered I would be more than happy to embrace facts but
until now there isnt a shred of evidence either the law of
attraction or a universal spirit exists. The more likely
scenario of the law of attraction is the promotion of
religion undercover.

According to the secret poverty, diseases, relationship

issues, quadriplegia, just about any problem can be solved by
the law we see within the video allegedly PHD
psychologists speaking side by side with preachers assuring
as that the law of attraction exists despite their promotion of
nebeism. We just have to trust them and embrace their
theory. Their attempt to sell religion in disguise and
convince viewers has failed.

One might ask usare you going to ask for evidence in

every miniscule event and confrontation in your life? Well,
what idealist are proposing is a metaphysical theory of
everything which needs to be taken seriously because it
determines everything hence requesting evidence is a
necessity not just a cautious and prudent measure. In
contrast, is it ok to trust individuals for using you phone to
make emergence calls where they fall into a mishap of a dead
battery might be optional because even if you give them your
phone as a good gesture to help them out and loose it on the
process you will buy another one but when it comes to
huge metaphysical theories of the universe and our origin
then trust and faith should never be employed.

- 108 -
So, coming to the concept of the law of attraction the
famous quote in the video was how bad do you want
change? They are pushing us to embrace the secret
without evidence because we are miserably poor in our state
of existent not because it is true. Is this a logical position?
Should we embrace anything just because we believe in a
theory anywhere but here? Isnt this a dangerous route?
Arent we selling ourselves? Idealists are experts in
exploiting people at their weakest points. Their totalitarian
approach to paralyze reason and commonsense is obvious for
those who contemplate and perlustrate their arguments. The
misanthropy shines through their concepts and theories.

The sensational nature and emotional appeal of the theory is

exceptional who wouldnt want to solve all their issues just
by thinking right as stated in the video? Who wouldnt want
to be rich just by desiring money? Who wouldnt want to
walk again just buy imagining himself as a healthy person?
Who wouldnt want to picture himself in a good
relationship so that he can attract good companions and
partners? All these idealistic notions should remind us what
the law of attraction is just another form of idealism which
comes short of demonstration.

The law of attractionists are telling us that our consciousness

is the creator of reality. Whatever you can imagine you can
create. They do not notice the pitfall in their hypothesis that
they are imagining but they are not realizing .i.e.
substantiating. They behave like adult children in a la-la
candy land.

- 109 -
If the outside world is nothing but ideas and can be
transformed by the mind as desired then the law of
attractionists and other idealists should demonstrate a utopian
universe free from poverty, pestilence, war, and tribulations.

Controlling your thoughts and feelings will never give a

world, experience and life that you want; your thoughts and
feelings are created by reality i.e. by disturbances and
movements within in the natural world not vice versa; your
mind is a passive organ where the dictums of reality are
impressed. The retinues of idealist George Berkeley in the
21st century calling themselves biocentrists, scientologists,
the law of attractionists and so on are just in a business of
confusion and derangement.

The very cause why idealism is attractive and appealing is

because it purports to forward a theory of everything and
suspends man from the ardor and toil of investigating the
material world. The most fascinating thing about realism and
materialism is that any theory emanating from them works
efficiently and is indisputably self-evident. Idealist and
mystical theories throughout the ages are as may have been
said before brain Childs of a confused and disordered
consciousness bogged down in nebeism. They are not self-
defending and sustaining theories but symptoms of a disorder
mind.

Therefore, if you were wondering if The law of attraction

works? Or if you were asking yourself it wouldnt hurt to
embrace The law of attraction then you are in for a huge
surprise of bankruptcy and dispossession. Because, the

- 110 -
hallmark of all idealistic and mystical theories is sophistry
and fallaciousness which leads to extinction.

When man gets sensational his reason ceases to function; his

critical faculty will be rendered lax. Hence, he will start
embracing theories without evidence. He will start to
believe in those theories despite their untenability and
despite the corrigible dictum of reality.

So, the bottom line in this article is that we should never care
for any theory if it is not self -evident. It does not matter how
luster, humble and genuine it may appear or how consoling it
may feel to our emotions. We must always evaluate evidence
or else we will be the jackasses at the end.

1.23 Dude! Where is the formula?

As is the case with many inventions, claims and products

there must be a method to distinguish between proposals and
effective proposals; claims and effective claims. The only
thing that differentiates facts from fiction; practicals from
theories is pragmatism and efficacy. There are several claims
in history and our only manner of declaring them as true is
their sensibility and demonstrability. The devil is always in
the details as the saying goes. I think what distinguishes a
hypothesis, belief, and opinion from a solid fact is evidence.
Basically, evidence can be divided into three things
according to my understanding:

* Formula

* Blueprint
- 111 -
* Fossil

I have already said that human nature is not fully rational and
the reason for digressing into mysticism is our limited
rational faculty. I think we all should be slapped back to our
senses once in a while when our lower self takes over our
mind to turn us capricious and mystical animals to derail us
from reason. Therefore, in order for any concept to pass the
test and be a solid fact it must have a formula explaining in a
terse manner its physiology and operations without error or
bias. The difference between philosophy and science is
established by this very method.

In order to develop any product that could improve the lives

of many in the society whether it is an electric car or a
nootropic drug it must have an equation and a detail
specification. Now, this is real science. If you have the
intellect to come up with a design for any global issue; then
your wish will be natures command; you will accomplish
anything as long as you have the right formula. The main
idea is that you must love the blackboard as a tool to
formulate your designs and blueprints of an innovative
product instead of running away from it into mystical
mummery.

Some claims propose upcoming evidence but upcoming

evidence is not evidence until you see it but a system of
hope. It may be probable or improbable as long as it stays
material. It has a chance of being true as long as it is
material. So you will be in a gambling situation waiting for
upcoming evidence to show itself. Other claims are non-
material at all and here you just can dismiss it completely

- 112 -
you dont have to label as a theory or experimental concept
because you will never be able to understand it. I think the
challenge is with figuring out the nuts and bolts of your
claim, product or theory and making it work and
demonstrable for the entire world to see and most claimants
have failed this procedure including super naturalists and
other mystics with their perplexed proposals and arguments.

A real scientist or claimant has nothing to hide or has a need

for chicanery He provides his theory backed up by a
working and sensible formula or blueprint for the benefit of
all beings. Those cozeners who attempt to deceive people
like magicians and imperialists are the biggest enemies of the
rational mind as well as the wellbeing of the human race. The
forbidding mountain as I like to call it which is organizing
your concept, theory or product into something which works
is avoided by many arguers in history instead of proving their
claims they divert into totalitarianism, obscurancy, vagary
and nihilism in order to subordinate the audience that has not
been convinced by their upcoming evidence and heart
melting emotional melodies. If you have observed people
who have a hard time convincing people through reason and
evidence always digress into emotional techniques to
convince people using terrorism, hope, and other similar
techniques; but, unfortunately sensationalism can never be a
foundation to any claim which has to be tested and work
effectively. The forbidding mountain i.e. rationalism is
always avoided by charlatans and dictators because it
demands higher intelligence that they do not have; and their
rational mind is dead. This is the root cause and foundation
of all pseudosciences and authoritarian belief systems that
exist today.
- 113 -
In short, any claim should be dismissed promptly if it is
immaterial, labeled hypothetical or experimental if it is
material and in the process of research and finally, a fact if it
is demonstrable in objective reality.

- 114 -
 Chapter-5

I- In defense of ethical self-preservation

1.1 Hedonism: maintaining the balance of the five

spectrums

Mystics and idealist have attempted as mad as they are to

denigrate and demonize the beautiful term of hedonism
seeking the self-destruction of precious man and his organs.
Hedonism lies as an ethical principle under the chapter of
self-preservation in amystology; which has five divisions or
spectrums; but most of time in my writing I discuss only the
first three even though all five are important and must be
discussed. In this essay we will see all five spectrums. When
it comes to the first three i.e. mental, emotional and physical
salubrity. It means that you must maintain the wellbeing of
all your organs in your body and systems because your mind,
emotional system and physical body are one and the same
there is no duality or equivocation. There are around 12
systems in the human organism and it means that you must
take care of the integrity as well as the salubrity of these
systems; not just maintain their welfare but also enhance
them if you have the technology. Your organs are the
products of billions of years of evolution by natural selection
thus they are super precious. Now, this has been probably
mentioned in my other writings and I am well aware of
repeating myself several times in my writings and the reason
for that is not to bore the reader but to emphasize the
important concepts in amystology. Thus, I think I should be
forgiven. Anyways, we can divide the process of maintaining
our wellbeing into five spectrums mental hedonism,

- 115 -
emotional hedonism, physical hedonism, social hedonism
and economical hedonism.

When we discuss about mental states we mean that the

mental is the physical there is no distinctions as discussed in
the first paragraph. According to WHO mental health is
defined as a state of well-being in which every individual
realizes his or her own potential, can cope with the normal
stresses of life, can work productively and fruitfully and is
able to make a contribution to her or his community. In
another definition health is a state of complete physical,
mental and social well-being and not merely the absence of
disease and infirmity. The mind is the brain maintaining the
health of your brain cells means maintaining the wellbeing of
your mind; reducing stress in life could be a challenge but it
must be attempted as much as you can; mental health is
related with the other spectrums of hedonism affecting one
has an influence on the other. Because, the mind is directly
connected with objectivity reality it is affected by the
physical, social, and economical circumstances on the
ground; therefore, maintaining the equanimity of the other
spectrums of salubrism will also maintain the balance of your
mental health.

Having a good romantic relationship with your partner is

another way of acquiring emotional wellbeing; because
romance is a great culture; love just like laughter is a
powerful emotion and salutary to ourselves. Good
companionship in a society that you live in is good for you
and your emotional wellbeing. It does not matter what sexual
orientation you possess you are entitled to happiness and
salubrity. And the most critical point is freedom from fear,
- 116 -
and totalitarian control which are indispensible to the health
of our emotion system. The individual must be free from cult
leaders, the state or anyone who is a threat to his emotional
stability. Our emotions are related to our mental, physical
state, social, and economical status all five spectrums are
connected we cannot discuss the rectification of one without
mentioning the other.

When we come to physical wellness there are several issues

which could be considered salutary to our bodies exercise,
massages, nutrition, and so forth. Circumstances which can
damage the body can be smoking, drugs, junk food, obesity
or stress. For example, stress increases the level of cortisol
hormone generated from glands on your kidney which can be
responsible for the increased release of glucose level in your
body increasing the level of osmolality of your blood which
puts pressure on the cardiovascular system. Another issue
can be saturated fats which have more hydrogen atom bonds
to their central carbons which make them hard to break and
metabolize leaving you at high risk of arteriosclerosis and
heart attacks damaging the pipe lines of the body. Regular
exercise can increase your muscle mass, reduce accumulation
of fat and augment your fitness level. Even though ageing of
the cells makes the heart less elastic and flexible to pump
blood and do its job effectively; exercise will definitely help
in this process of late life reducing cholesterol and glucose
level in the plasma make you in good shape even at old age.
Try your best not to smoke, drink, take drugs or get stressed
in a way which damage your organs; because that will be
self- mortification which is a taboo in amystology.

- 117 -
When we discuss social hedonismwe mean maintaining
the harmony between the individual and the society in a hope
of avoiding acrimony and discord. A good example of social
hedonism can be babysitting, the military and traffic
policemen etc. Despite your unwillingness and tight schedule
you volunteerhesitantly to watch the kids of your neighbor;
we also have soldiers who die in the process of defending
others and traffic policemen who maintain order on the
streets in harsh weathers sacrificing their emotional and
physical wellbeing for the sake of social hedonism (social
harmony). These individuals may acquire respect, love,
accolades and admiration by the society for their choice of
social hedonism; but in the process neglect or dismiss the
other four spectrums in order to fulfill one; in a hope that the
same social favor will be returned by the society in the day
were they might need it themselves; this type of choice is
frankly is up to the individual to select i.e. which form of
hedonism to acquire and which to dismiss. If he chooses
social hedonismdismissing mental, emotional, physical
and economic hedonism; then, it is up to himbut he should
never dismiss all five all together because that will be self-
sacrifice. To live in a society where everybody loves
everybody would have been a great blessing and gift;
wouldnt it? But the natural order and status quo on the
ground makes that difficult and problematic; but, any how it
is invaluable for your social wellbeing that you dwell in a
society that you have something in common with like
ideologies, cultures or political leanings because that is
where you will be happier the most; it will be much easier to
get along with others and be comfortable as well as have a
mirthful social interaction if you live with the kinds of
- 118 -
individuals like yourself. Having a good relationship and
interaction with other members of the society is believe it
or not is related directly with your mental, emotional and
physical wellbeing. For example no noise pollution i.e. peace
and stability, a benevolent life partner i.e. boyfriend or
girlfriend, a loving family and clean environment, affects you
in a positive manner and is beneficial to your health. Hence,
social hedonism cannot be detached from other spectrums of
health and wellbeing because it affects you positively as
much as the others.

Economic status plays a huge role in our welfare; extreme

poverty as well as extreme wealth seems to be culprits in
destabilizing the balance of hedonism and cause a strain in
our wellbeing because poverty unfortunately makes people
immobile and reduces their freedom of movement, choice as
well as recreation triggering mental and emotional distress;
on the opposite side extreme wealth also increases the level
of responsibility, and disquietude which unfortunately
triggers the same thing. Now, capitalism is great; people
must be elevated out of poverty but not in to isolation and
extreme greed which is not beneficial even to the rich people.
Accumulating wealth is a blessed endeavor in a manner
which can maintain the balance of hedonism on the five
spectrums.

Therefore, maintaining the balance of the five spectrums is

an invaluable endeavor in order to live in equanimity,
stability and bliss.

- 119 -
1.2 The virtue of self-esteem and the ailment of self-
inferiority

Idealists and mystics tell you that you must never elevate
yourself and have a healthy love, respect and dignity for your
mind and body; most importantly you must never have an
ambition of becoming better or great. You just have to
enslave yourself to inane myths concocted by idealists,
imposters, and spiritualists; you just have to disdain yourself
and self-mortify for the sake of illusions and delusions; be
miserable and just die. This bleak vision emanates from a
dark consciousness and mind which is ignorant about the
natural world as well as metaphysical truths.

You must respect your mind and body take good care of
yourself in all five spectrums; because frankly, the evolution
of life on earth seems to be heading to a great destination; the
level of intelligence is augmenting indicating the coming
of a super being and a possible utopia; therefore; why in the
world would you want to destroy your precious body and die;
because mystics surmise that there is already a god who is
higher than yourself? Could surmises and topsy-turvy
discourses be an evidence for a higher being? How could
having a healthy respect and dignity for your self be labeled
grandiloquence?

Idealist (i.e. founders of all anti-realism movements which

includes all religions in history and other mutant systems
which appear to possess the visage of real science but in
reality are pseudo sciences and branches of idealism like
Biocentrism and the law of attraction) will never be
satisfied until you become schizophrenic, miserable and fill

- 120 -
the grave. Idealism is a nook for confused, nihilistic and
misanthropist individuals. If you observe the attitudes of
idealists they tend to be totalitarian and collective
shrugging the inalienable right of the individual to choice and
wellness. This theory is the most destructive concept ever
invented just see what idealism is doing to the world;
observe the current Middle East and the challenges that it has
brought forth not just to that region but to whole world; it
is those people who think that their mind is a spirit that are
bombing airports and running over people with huge trucks;
why would idealists envision such a dark social concept for
humanity which will create suffering and death? Isnt
happiness and wellness the most treasured state of mind?
Isnt the completeness of nature the unflinching truth?

Respecting your body and mind does not mean grandeur and
disdain for your fellow members of the society; idealists love
to distort the idea of self-preservation beyond its rightful
proportion into extreme in order to attack it easily; but for
any calm and sage examiner the difference between
salubrism and grandiose is vividly clear. They state that it is
the greatest sin to call yourself with a capital I you must
deride your self-esteem and refer to yourself with a small
letter i in subjugation for a non-existent god a god of
absence. The problem with this people is that first of all,
their formulation of metaphysics is terribly wrong. The more
they delve into their fictive philosophies and cogitate about
spiritualism; the more delusional they become and finally end
up psychotic and their psychosis makes them think they are
in the right direction.

- 121 -
Nothing can exist outside nature! Which immediately
nullifies the so called supernatural god and their system
altogether because most of their system is based on the
concept of supernaturalism; they say you must submit
yourself without any question to the supernatural concept;
despite, having already established the fact that
supernaturalism is inane and absence. Hence, the action of
submitting yourself to supernaturalism could only mean
submitting yourself to the whims and caprice of idealists and
mystics. It is their whims which fills the absence of a
supernatural god. The supernatural god is a pseudonym for
themselves.

Therefore, their call on to you to belittle yourself is a call for

slavery to their madness and error. Reason indicates that
nature is complete; nature includes all beings as Baron d
Holbach would say; and their confused mind is seen to drag
everything around that it can grab into oblivion just like a
black hole. All evidence suggests that nature is not going
anywhere; if this is so why wouldnt you consider the
evolution of life as an indication of something great and
preserve yourself? Why would you consider the material
world as loathsome? Does this indicate sanity? To hate your
self is to hate life; to hate life is to hate all of mankind.

The preposterous thing about supernaturalism as a branch of

idealism is that this simple oxymoron has created major
bloodshed and calamity in history due to peoples negligence
to look into its grammar and linguistic qualities which
contradict with logic, commonsense, and reality. It is really
sad that an invalid term could create so much tribulation on
the planet; founders of idealism as evil as they are have their
- 122 -
interest in stupefying and degrading precious man so that he
could be tamed to their speculations, and erroneous theories.
So that he can be a perfect subject to their every mood swing,
edict or dictum.

They like to feel his head under their boots; screaming in

vainglorybeating their chest in imperial domination. It is
the mystics themselves that are vainglorious and grandeur
who elevate themselves above others; to impose their
musings and mythological social systems. They indict
atheists and realists of The illusion of grandeur for their
ambition to preserve and enhance themselves as well as
refusal to accept idealism; but given the above discourse it
is idealists themselves who are under the illusion of
grandeur; obsessed with authority and enslavement of the
individual to their folklores. How could the inability to
understand entities beyond our design be regarded as aloof?
They state that the idea of self-inferiority is necessary in
order to introduce ethics into the behavior of men and
stabilize the society into a harmonious union. There are two
important things to consider when we discuss morality or
ethics: If you want people to behave

1st They need to embrace the idea of natural absolutism.

2nd They need to understand their nature which is

responsible for their experiences.

3rd They need to believe in discussions and the right to

choice while dealing with ethical and moral issues with other
members of the society.

- 123 -
If they understand that nature is the sole metaphysical truth;
then they will slowly begin to attribute mundane
manifestations and their daily experiences to their own nature
and other natural forces which makes it easier for them to
rectify their attitude to create a harmonious society as well as
manage nature to their preferences solving many of their
challenges from ailment to poverty i.e. all diseases could
only be cured through natural understanding and research;
global poverty could be solved by innovation and ingenuity.
The innovation of drugs, machinery and other utilities has
created many jobs and tremendous wealth throughout history.
It is natural understanding which creates health and wealth.
Now, natural understanding is one thing; whereas, what
should be moral or legal is another; thus, in order to solve
this conundrum there must be a platform of discussion and
choice. All ethical and moral issues must be promulgated or
rescinded based on discussions and choice by the
participation of all members of the society.

Now, coming back to the main topic of discussion the

attitude of self- inferiority will never create an ethical
society; but a society of minions and tyrants; self-inferiority
will force the elevation of others above you; in a similar
manner the attitude of vainglory will evoke others to adopt
grandiloquence i.e. racism will create more racism;
imperialism will evoke others to be apprehensive and
imperial. Both extreme ends (i.e. self-inferiority and
vaunting) are unhealthy; but self-esteem couldnt be any
healthier. There is no such thing as a healthy self-inferiority;
self-inferiority emanates out of depression. You must
maintain the vivacity and vigor of your mind and body;
always being prudent not to sacrificesocial hedonism i.e.
- 124 -
the social fabric and harmony of your society by exceeding
the limit i.e. vainglory. Because, sacrificing even one
spectrum has a consequence; it is all about balancing your
mental, emotional, physical, social and economic salubrity.
You must defend this balance from disruption by idealist
racketeers and advocates of slavery, misery and death.

Realism will prevail!

1.3 Legal, ethical and moral issues must be debatable and

mutable

All ethical issues are debatable and up for discussion by the

individuals who make up the society. They must be
promulgated or rescinded based on individual choice in a
referendum and should never be a dogma! This includes
cultures, economical systems, moral codes etc. What is a
dogma is the issue of metaphysics and epistemology i.e.
naturalism and realism. Ethical and moral values must follow
new developments and always surrender to reason,
commonsense and most importantly always place under
consideration the welfare of the individual.

When we discuss the issues of morality we imply that there is

a society of humans. Moral regulations could only be
relevant if there is a community. As long as there is a society;
there will be social interaction; this social interaction will
demand right and wrongs? What should be the culture of a
society? What should be its economic system? What is moral
- 125 -
and what is immoral? And so on. Now, it is really difficult to
imagine what the fate of the society will be. Will humans be
extinct and be replaced by something else? Will the genus
Homo be absolute? Will they evolve into self-sufficient
super beings bringing an end to the society and all moral
issues altogether? Will they evolve into a super intelligence?
Will they be able to save their parent star? Will they be able
to escape into another universe? Whatever is the fate of the
humanity and the cosmos? All these questions are legitimate
and whatever creature comes about in the future it is going
to be made up of matter and energy; because, they are the
building blocks of reality; it may live with other counter parts
creating a society; which demands rules.

The progress of any society is inevitable the natural world is

not static it is unstable and ever changing. Thus, morality
and legality must keep up with this change in order to ensure
the happiness of the individuals in a society. If legal, moral
or ethical issues do not maintain the welfare and bliss of
individuals; then, what is their purpose? If these moral codes
and ethical values do not provide the fulfillment in the five
spectrums; then, what is their use? They will be a hindrance
to wellness. They will be absolutely useless! If they do not
stand for the happiness and wellbeing of the individualthen
they must be discarded.

When we come to the issues of epistemology and

metaphysics the rules are set on stone; realism and naturalism
are the norms. Because, when we consider human
nature/design and analyze the manner of knowing; we will
come to the conclusion that man as a material being can only
comprehend material data. Even, if the singularity or super
- 126 -
intelligence was here it is going to be made up of matter and
energy making realism, rationalism and objectivity the only
manner of creating knowledge and memories. The issue of
naturalism is also not up for debate because reality is not
debatable; you can perceive it or you can deny that you are
perceiving it. It is your choice. Thus, metaphysical
naturalism governs any creature with any kind of design and
intelligence level that exists or will exist in the future.

The problem with making morality and ethical values a

dogma is that as said above the natural world is eternal but
not static; the regulations of today might not work for
tomorrow. All institutions that make moral codes dogmas
will be defunct. Even, if the current human design and nature
changes to be something different that particular different
new creature will exist in reality making rationality,
objectivity and naturalism a necessity for his operation. The
regulations of humans may be different from other creatures
like aliens, cyborgs, robots and other super intelligence
creatures based on their nature and stage of self-sufficiency.
If a creature becomes self-sufficient; then, there will be no
need for morality and ethics. This is why legal, ethical and
moral issues must be different for every creature and be open
for corrigibly and mutability at all times.

- 127 -
 II- In defense of ethical self-enhancement

1.1 Behavioral design drugs can be used to enforce ethics

and morality in a society without a need to digress to
futile superstition

One of the most concerning issues as long as there is a

society is the issue of morality or what needs to be the norm
of a particular society? How should people behave in a
society? What should be moral and immoral? This is a very
contentious issue. But the solution is so simple and it lies in
materialism; which is behavioral design. Considering the
unshakable truth of natural absolutism; what else could ever
be a solution except natural understanding even to ethics and
morality? Yes, the completeness of nature compels us to only
seek solutions exclusively inside it and morality is not an
exception. Human behavior is the result of complex natural
physiology and this physiology and natural process can only
be altered or modified by natural science through technology.

Some people might raise the issue that once we start alerting
and modifying human nature, then it will be a slippery slope
towards nihilism; but I beg to differ because it does not
matter how complete our understanding of nature is; the
choice that we make to either do good or evil using this
understanding is solely on our conscience. It is possible that
evil people could use science and natural understanding to
create evil events like for example soldiers can be designed
to be merciless killers without any conscience or microbes
can be altered to be extremely deadly; nuclear fission
technology can be used to create pandemonium and so on.
Here, intelgnos can be used to do evil or goodso people

- 128 -
advised that they must always use their freaking conscience
to always do well for the benefit of all sentient beings.

Therefore, ethics and morality are the business of natural

science not social sciences. Large voluminous and rosy
mystical texts of regulations may look very appealing at face
value but are utterly futile on the ground in regulating human
nature. Thou shall not fornicate may look very colorful on
paper but cannot restraint the forces of hormones that rage in
our blood streams and the lustful genes that we are born with.
The laws and wishes of man can never prevail over the
dictums of natural forces. The act of promulgating ethical
and moral codes cannot be anything other than symbolic
gestures because these laws are going to be broken by the
human design.

We are nature; hence, we are. If this so what could be the

solution to human behavior and society regulation except a
natural formula? The most astonishing thing about the natural
world and our experiences is that even our mood is
chemical! I mean how totalitarian and complete do you want
nature to be? How much evidence does it take to convince
people that they are completely material starting from their
thoughts to their physical body? The reason as I said
elsewhere why people divert to superstitious madness
searching for supernatural morality is due to either naivety,
intelagnos or fear of the unknown. Ignorance most
commonly triggers fear which triggers systems of reverie and
irrationality. Whether, we like or not we are completely
material; at this very moment you might state a rebuttal by
saying is the material world conscious does it feel
happiness, ire, and joy? And I will be straight forward to
- 129 -
your face and say that the organized material world can
think, feel and ponder! And that organized material object is
you and other sentient beings. You might continue with your
rebuttal by stating who is organizer of the organized? I will
say the laws of nature.

Theology can never be a source of morality; god as an

expression of human weakness and natural ignorance is
always invoked when human intelligence and capability run
out. If Theo-mythology was really credible in enforcing any
benefit for the society; it would have made people mentally,
emotionally, physically, socially and economically healthy.
But its contributions are in reversejust like other branches
of idealism it is a totalitarian cult of self-destruction; which
upsets the balance of nature. The flawed perception that it is
invaluable for morality comes from the ignorance that human
behavior is not natural; which is horribly wrong because
nature is complete; human behavior cannot be anything else
but natural. Therefore, in order to deal with ethics people
either need to be thought to understand their nature or alter it
in accordance to their preference and expected outcome.
They are advised to understand their nature in order to
exhibit a behavioral change just by rationally managing their
attitudes as in the case of behavioral therapy which is just
solved by discussion or by altering the human organism
through chemicals and physical extensions which may be
invasive but is a solution to create a harmonious society.

Behavioral design is not something exotic it is already

happening for example psychiatrist prescribe anti-mania
drugs in order to regulate human behavior to bring it to what
is considered normal; what is normal? Well, that is up for
- 130 -
discussion by the individuals that make up the society. But,
any ways chemical alteration or bio hacking as it is called
today of the human organism aiming for the good is not
outlandish. In short, there may be some ethical issues which
can be solved just by cultural training and dialogue but others
may demand physical and chemical alterations of the human
body in order to create a civil society without a need to
digress to mystical morality.

1.2 There will be no peace and serenity in our world

without changing human nature!

Man is beast and an animal like other animals in the animal

kingdom. Notwithstanding this fact man is nescient of his
true nature as well as his creator, animator, and determiner
which is nature. It is really ridiculous for man to lullaby and
delude himself by telling himself that he is not a beast with a
bestial design existing in his genes. As has been said
elsewhere human behavior emanates from the human design.
As the Aristotle wisely said understanding your nature is
beginning of all wisdom. I believe by stating this statement
Aristotle knew that human nature itself is the one shaping the
world in its own image reaffirming the authority of nature as
the sole supreme entity in existence. The sooner we
understand and embrace this fact the better; because we can
then get busy into purging, editing and enhancing human
nature in to a higher non-bestial design rectifying the
abhorable blueprint set by nature. Hence, there will be no
serenity in our world without editing the human nature,
editing human nature will augment the likelihood of the

- 131 -
survival of the human species, and finally bring about the
peace and serenity that humanity longed for since he
established societies to lead his life.

Peace, peacepeace and so forth are the cries of politicians

and ordinary men on the streets; but what they seem to point
out is their craving not the solution; they seem to forget what
the solution is in bringing about a better and peaceful world;
which is intelligent design or evolution by personal
selection as I like to call it; all manifestations on the ground
are not the work of god but the work of nature and
specifically human nature. The belligerent and selfish nature
of mankind is responsible for the hellish world that we
behold; it is responsible for creating societies, the state and
mysticism; it is also responsible for all the wars conflicts on
the ground form the Middle East to Vietnam and all the way
back to the middle east itself; sectarianism, imperialism,
communism, capitalism, mysticism, rationalism and so forth
emanate from the human design; which is responsible for
creating all these things. Therefore, if man craves equanimity
and so forth it will be mandatory first to understand the
supremacy of nature! Then devise a sage blueprint by editing
the human genome or whatever natural chemical is
responsible for the human behavior to create a stable world;
hence, ethics can be solved by scientific behavioral design
and human nature can be managed chemically to be less
belligerent, vulgar and salacious.

The other benefit from purging and enhancing mankind is

that it will more likely rise the chance of the survival of the
human species; because in the process of eliminating
weaknesses and animal traits; mankind will end up becoming
- 132 -
robust and durable. The technology for accomplishing all
these feats may not exist today but at least the vision for
creating better humans exists and the technology will
hopefully come about in a step by step manner into the
future. Therefore, we must be relentlessly insist the
enhancement of mankind whether the technology exists or
not; because natural cataclysms wait for nobody the sun is
not meant to burn foreverit will die someday in the future
but what can never die is nature or the cosmos. Hence, our
understanding of our universe and nature as extremely
important in the life extension endeavor of the human species
this knowledge can be used to amend the human condition
like violence and other challenges; in the process entailing
the survival of the human species as Carl Sagan says The
Cosmos is all that is or ever was or ever will beThe size and age of
the Cosmos are beyond ordinary human understanding. Lost somewhere
between immensity and eternity is our tiny planetary home. In a cosmic
perspective, most human concerns seem insignificant, even petty. And yet
our species is young and curious and brave and shows much promise. In
the last few millennia we have made the most astonishing and unexpected
discoveries about the Cosmos and our place within it, explorations that
are exhilarating to consider. They remind us that humans have evolved to
wonder, that understanding is a joy, that knowledge is prerequisite to
survival. I believe our future depends on how well we know this Cosmos
in which we float like a mote of dust in the morning sky. (Cosmos;
1980:1)

The serenity that mankind is yearning for; that, communism,

socialism, capitalism and etc. failed to accomplish lies within
transhumanism and intelligent design: evolution by personal
selection. The cries for world peace and stability could only
come about through behavioral design and augmentation.
- 133 -
Clothing man by the opulent silk dress of spiritualism cannot
change his belligerent genes or by the ordinary kaki clothe of
communism can never change his selfish genes; only
technology and intelligent design can bring about a tranquil
planet and a utopian cosmos. All the suffering and
unhappiness of humanity can only be alleviated by science
and technology employed for the sake of intelligent design. It
is only here at this stage that real peace can manifest.

Therefore, as a conclusion humanities salvation exists

exclusively in technology; his aspirations to dwell in a
violence free utopian or something close to a utopian world
could only materialize through the absolute understanding of
nature or what is called masterdom in amystology. Therefore,
let us work together to bring about the end of the Darwinian
era and the commencement of a utopian natural order
through science and technology.

1.3 The Darwinian natural order is the source of all evil

and suffering which has to be changed

Since the rise of man and the establishment of society

humanity has formulated various solutions and hypothesis to
explain metaphysics, epistemology, and define ethical
regulations to govern society.; various political systems and
several ethical doctrines have been implemented on the
society to discern the most efficacious and effective ones;
starting from the pre-socratic philosophers till the present day
contemplators and thinkers have attempted to formulate some

- 134 -
sort of system or theory as the ultimate solution for the
world.

These philosophers have several vantage points on how they

chose to see the world or perspectives; many of them chose
the route of reverie like mystic Plato and all his modern day
descendants; which we can generally call idealists and
mystics; but others like the great Democritus and Aristotle
choose realism and objectivity as a vantage point; among
these realists was Naturalist Charles Darwin who was valiant
enough to publish a comprehensive theoretical dissertation or
a bookregarding his perspective about the natural world.
His theory was not an invention like all idealistic and
mystical theories in history starting from the epic of
Gilgamesh to modern day Christianity but an observation of
reality on the ground; in addition the theory of evolution was
a concept long held by other scientists and philosophers
before him (like Democritus) and at his time to which he
gives credit in his own book; (see: The Descent of Man,
introduction) but, he was keen enough to compile it and
publish the theory of evolution in well-organized manner; for
the sake of mankind; so, that we can understand our true
origin.

Now, this insight into our origin solves part of the problem in
our world; because we at least understood where we come
from, now we must choose where to go to either to the
grave or to supremacy (immortality). In addition we also
understand why the world is the way it is i.e. an animal
planet filled with competition and gory. Now, the solution
thanks to our science and technology has to be the alteration
and decimation of this savage natural order to replace it with
- 135 -
a better mechanical and technological civilization; when I say
mechanical I mean the replacement of biology with
technology; which does not hold any of the abhorable traits
like violence, salacity, vulgarity and other ill traits. I think
this will be the ultimate cure to the world i.e. changing
human nature by intelligent design will definitely decimate
the Darwinian natural order.

I personally do not like myself as an animal; I want to be an

AI who is not violent, salacious, and at least who smells
better than hominids. Anyways, I have said so many times
that human nature itself shapes the world in its own image;
the evidence for this deduction lies on the ground within our
world; where the animal instincts and passions of man have
created the competition of states, violence related with
barbarity, and other myriad manifestations; that we behold
emanate directly from human nature either consciously or
subconsciously. Now, if man as part of nature is responsible
for everything on the ground in tandem with other natural
forces; then where will this leave the so called supernatural
god; well supernaturalism for the reasons mentioned above
is dead and long gone; it is just a past time for ancient
shepherds and fairytalists; but thankfully nature is alive and it
is the sole preoccupation in our discussions.

I am so grateful to really understand the theory of naturalism;

it is a real liberator and empowerer; it puts its finger right at
the source of it all which is nature. It teaches me that
nature is god; and it is responsible for all creation,
decimation, manifestation, evolution insumma. This informs
me that in order to acquire any solution whether it is
changing the current natural order which is the topic of this
- 136 -
article or anything for that matter! Then, I must deal with
nature rationally; why? Because, nature is the sole sovereign
and supreme entity in existence. If you want to end world
hunger; then why not alter human design; why should man
be dependent on organic based bio molecular energy; why
not create humans who are powered by nuclear energy;
electricity or solar energy? This will reduce and eliminate
agricultural dependency, and the production of related
products like pesticides, and increase the likely hood of the
survival of the human species on other planets which are
not earth like. If you want to reduce violence why not create
humans without the amygdala? Now, when we discuss
redesigning the human species and ushering in new species;
the following questions might arise: which type of design is
intelligent design and which one is not? If humans start
altering themselves, then there will be several species on the
planet; so doesnt this need some sort of regulation? This is
really a good question; because nobody can live in side
anarchy there must be rulesbut the answer is problematic
because people want to be so many different things; so they
have their own choices; I for example, what to be an AI
who is not pugnacious, salacious, woolgatherer (irrational),
hoggish, and biological; this is the reason I call it evolution
by personal selection. People will have so many ideas and
designs on what to be; therefore, there needs to be a platform
to discuss the issues of acceptable designs; forums where
we can discuss the transhumanist world.

Now, the second most important question that will arise is: Is
the technology present today fit to save all sentient human
families on the planet to become transhumanist creatures
extant? Well, some of it does and so of it doesnt; hence, we
- 137 -
just need to keep on promoting the philosophy of intelligent
design side by side with research and development to bring
an end to this abominable world; whether, the technology
exists or not; it will eventually come by slowly and step by
step; and how should the next species be designed is up to
current humans to have an open and frank discussion as said
above on how to overthrow the Darwinian natural order of
interspecies cannibalism and savagery to bring about a better
utopian world order. I personally have made it my life goal
and agenda to advocate for the desinence of the current
natural order; and the promoter of intelligent design and a
better world; which will be shaped by the nature of
transhumanist creatures. It is a privilege and honor to call
myself a transhumanist, atheist, humanist, futurist and most
importantly amystologist; who is part of a great rationalist
movement in the 21st century in history; where we are in an
acute stage of transition between Sapiens and Cyborgs.

Change the Darwinian natural order and you

will have heaven on earth!

- 138 -
 III-In defense of ethical self-sufficiency

1.1 Will Capitalism and Socialism survive the techno-

evolution?

The cold war between the west and soviet bloc since the
establishment of USSR till its disintegration in 1991 has been
the most notable competition between two ideologies in
history capitalism and socialism /communism. None of these
concepts are perfect they are not the ultimate truths they have
advantages and disadvantages especially communism
which totally failed in creating a better society. Communism
instead of eliminating monarchism that it considered the
source of problem and evil which it vehemently opposed and
overthrew it created the monarchy of the proletariat. On
the other hand, the triumph and euphoria moment of
capitalism seems to be at brink of desinence. The evolution
of societies, social theories and ideologies seems to be
heading towards transhumanism. This new concept brings the
prospect of human nature transformation and self-
sufficiency; which is the core idea to consider here. Which
some consider as a treat to business, trade and even the
society. In a social setting that we all live in today as frail
humans there are facts that can never be dismissed for
example I need security from a fellow member of the society
who can be my neighbor; but, is a police man in the airport as
his official social duty because I am self- insufficient and
cannot look after by safety all the time and in reverse I can
be a physician who provide health care to this man; therefore,
a cycle of goods and services is established creating a
society. But this concept of socialism where one member of
the society is dependent and is the solution as well as the
- 139 -
problem of the other member of the society has a possibility
of becoming history when man enhances himself to become
competent in intellect as well as in body.

The age of innovation and progress brings with it a change to

how a society is structured and functions. The idealistic
dream of communism which forgot to put under
consideration epistemological realism and naturalism as well
as consequentialism failed terribly in the eyes of global
audience. The publication of the communist manifesto in
1848 which created so much hype to overwhelm the rational
mind into delirium only created famine and schizophrenia
where ever it was experimented on. Capitalism also with its
side effect of pollution, worker rights abuse and exploitation
seems to be on the brink of redundancy. The level of
intelgnos is augmenting which is enabling people to envision
a future where they will just ask for what they want they need
not work anymore. For example, people do not need to buy
wheat form a farmer to make dough and feed themselves for
acquire their calories survive while in the process
establishing trade with others. If they are built with a
technology that can directly capture energy from the sun or
dissipated forms of energy from the atmosphere here on earth
they will be energy self-sufficient; this will be the end of
famine and trade. This is currently science fiction but the
equipment's are already evolving like 3D printers which
create objects that people want specifically designed to their
needs. They are inchoate gadgets but we must understand
that in evolutionary history nature has not created anything
all at once. These gadgets will get better and better as time
moves forward. I surmise that in the future people will draw
a bread in their computer software and the replicator as an
- 140 -
accessory just like a printer or scanner will 3D print the bread
out of thin air by gathering carbon, hydrogen and oxygen
atoms from the atmosphere to create a carbohydrate in real
time just like atmospheric water vapor gatherer which creates
potable water form thin airwhich actually in fact exists
today in the market and you can buy one.

This innovation will not be limited to pabulum but peoples

attire, shoes, cars, organs and every necessity might be
printed into order by the replicator. Now, consider the
consequence of this for a moment or two.there is a huge
possibility that there would be a world which is close to a
utopia; this will occur as human understanding of nature
augments rapidly. In hospitals people unfortunately, waiting
for organs can print their organs at home using their stems
cells in their own personal computer under the supervision of
a health technician to ensure hygiene and efficacy and bring
it to the hospital for transplant and surgery. They can do this
without spending a dime in medical bills other than their
surgery. Technology is a very powerful disruptor of social
order to the benefit of the society and sometimes to its
damage. If people start printing everything they want and just
asking for it; then it will be the end of the society as we know
it. Now one will go to work anymore or has to work
anymore.

Now if we consider that most advanced probability that

technology can bestow other than just printing objects into
order and assume that if people evolve into transformers;
then, they do not need transportation, or medication from
other society members they can fly to any destination as well
as treat themselves by evolving into new disease resistant
- 141 -
creatures just like bacteria and viruses in order to save
themselves room ailments. Who needs Doctors if you can
evolve just like bacteria to heal yourself? If this Sci-fi dream
becomes a reality then what could possibly happen to the
economy? There will be no economy! Everybody will be
self-sufficient. Some people especially socialists say that
people can never live in isolation or be self-sufficient they
will be go insane; but, this argument only refers to humans
and their current design; it is absolutely possible to create
beings who are totally comfortable in isolation; the main
determining factor is the design of that creature. So,
socialism is not something written on stone it can be over
turned. What is written on stone is the divinity of nature.

Profit has always been the means of survival for humanity;

people without profit cannot survive. Eliminating profit has
created famine and misery in every country it has been tested
on with communist sensationalism. The hype of ideal
communist society instead of creating a utopia as its founders
surmised created a dystopia hell. In the reverse capitalism in
order to create progress and growth has sucked the blood of
workers and destroyed the environment to the extent it has
become a treat to human existence. We should always
remember that any theory can only be judged by its benefit,
sensibility, demonstrability and most of all consequences on
the ground. Even though capitalism is a source of survival;
the success and pavilion it built is founded on the corpse of
workers and dead environment.

- 142 -
Therefore, as a conclusion the evolution of any society is
inevitable. The society in general from ancient times till
today has gone along the path from communal existence,
capitalist individualism and now it is transcending into a
transhumanist self-existence. Even though no man on the
planet today is self-sufficient and still lives in a society. But,
there is ample evidence to suggest that the transformation of
the human organism is already underway slowly by the
increasing number of cyborgs that live among us today. If
this progress continues then there is a huge possibility that
capitalism and socialism as social theories have to eventually
leave their place to transhumanism.

1.2 Man must keep up with evolution in order to

guarantee his survival, dominance and finally to be Homo
Deus

Man by all means and evidence provided is not a fallen

angel as dictated by Middle Eastern shepherds; but, a risen
ape out of cosmic dust as suggested by modern day
physicists. Even though, mans finite intelligence still makes
him a miserable and dependent organism on the state, society
and mystical shacks; he is still the dominant species on earth.
This dominance might not be everlasting as was the
domination of the dinosaurs; unless otherwise, he keeps on
augmenting his mind and body through personal selection.

Several experiments suggest that materialism works

effectively due to the simple reason that nature is the
supreme entity. If this is the fact then we are obliged to think
that we must not only preserve life; but, enhance it to
- 143 -
infinity. Man can even prevent the disintegration of our solar
system and the universe as a whole if he is endowed with a
super intelligent rational brain which he currently does not
possess; entailing the capability to perform anything.

The finiteness of the human brain as I said so many times

limits the achievements he can accomplish. All the dreams
and aspirations of our ancestors including stopping aging,
immortality, creating rain in times of drought, healing the
lame, curing the infirmed and so on can be accomplished if
the human brain has a powerful superfast rational
calculations and ingenuity.

Our experiments with natural forces has shown to us that

reason and the scientific method work efficiently some times
to our trepidation: making the lame walk again, creating
rainfall, and even performing reversible death i.e. (preserving
someone at 10 degree centigrade below the normal body
temperature where heart and brain activity come to a halt and
resurrecting people back to consciousness again) and may be
in the future a technology for preserving our sun from dying
may also exist. All these feats are really very scary ideas but
despite our trepidation these experiments show us that
materialism works and we are supposed to be the masters of
our destiny within eternal nature.

The dreams of ancient mystics to tame the natural world just

by employing idealism or in other words with prayers and
sacrifices was the wrong approach. In order to deal with
nature we need to be super rational with an immense
processing capability which we currently do not have; this
may be the reason why tend to go to sleep in math and

- 144 -
engineering classes rather than attend attentively. Biologists
tell us that he cortex of the human brain has not changed or
evolved for the last several thousands of years since its
abrupt development from lower primates. Thus, if our brain
is not enhancing and evolving itself in the recent thousands
of years; what can we deduce about what nature has in mind
for us? Is she trying to shove us into a museum piece as old
models of antiquity together with Homo erectus, Homo
habilis and Homo neandertalensis by creating something
better? Is nature rescinding the era of Homo sapiens in order
to usher in the era of Homo machines? It certainly looks so
by the emergence of so many cyborgs that live among us
already like Professor Stephen Hawking, Neil Harbinson and
so on.

The transition from Homo sapiens to Homo cyborgs seems to

be happening right before our eyes and when these cyborgs
or machines get more sophisticated and when flaws are
minimized then we will transit into the era of Home Deus;
where, the techno-singularity manifests. Thus, this era looks
like the end of humanity and the incipience of a super being
in nature; because, the human cerebral cortex which is
responsible for our human civilization is not evolving any
further it has stopped. If this is so; then, what is evolving?
The technological evolution has been ongoing since the
industrial revolution in European countries. Today this
technological evolution has reached a state where machines
are being able to perform surgeries on patients with a
supervising medical surgeon.

In addition, these machines are being designed to be learning

and reading machines just like humans with an immense
- 145 -
power far more power full than the human brain itself in
calculation and capacity. Is artificial intelligence the
organism which proclaims the end of the era of humans and
the beginning of a new eon of super intelligent machines
which are not limited and pinned down on earth by their
biological nature to conquer and explore the cosmos as a
whole? I believe that nature is accelerating the technological
evolution of machines because I think she wants being who
are ready and naturally built for the harsh cosmic
environment outside earth.

These machines unlike humans are not biological; they do

not need food water or oxygen which exists as long as we
known copiously on earth. Hence, we can sense that nature is
preparing for the ultimate departure of organisms outside
earth and it is trying to create machines which can leave earth
to dwell on any harsh planet which is not conducive to
biological life and I believe the dominance of Homo sapiens
will run out when the rise of these machines becomes
complete and when they gain full consciousness, and
omnipotence (singularity). Then I believe that humans will
not have any place in the world; the intelligence which had
made them the masters of all species on earth will be defunct
and overwhelmed by the machines if these machines are not
under their control? But the most important question is: how
can we possibly control organisms with higher or infinite
intelligence; unless, otherwise we are equally intelligent with
these beings? How can something inferior control something
superior? Does that even make any sense? We can never
guarantee the survival of Homo sapiens unless humans are
equally enhanced; because it is just natural for higher beings
to lead and lower beings to follow; I have a concern that
- 146 -
unenhanced inferiorly intelligent humans might either be
subjugated or even wiped out by the higher intelligence that
is coming.

Therefore, the guarantee that we all have in order to ascertain

our existence is to enhance ourselves to become Homo
Deus in alignment with the rise of the machines. This will
prevent our inferiority and may be extinction by super
intelligent machines that are evolving rapidly in our world.
The evolution of super intelligent machines should not be a
problem but the stagnation of human intelligence capability.

Some individuals might raise the issue of ethical concerns

saying that the body should not be tampered with and it
should be left as an untouchable temple which is not a sage
statement in a world of rapid advances in technology;
because, our mushy obsolete bodies might not compete with
cyborgs and machines. Hence, may become subject to natural
selection where the weak get eliminated. Therefore, in a
Darwinian world of hyper competition for survival we need
to keep up with the latest advances in technological trends in
order to reassure the survival of the human species by
adaptation.

From a marketing and business perspective; there are

millions of people who support transhumanism and
biohacking on our planet today. This means there is a huge
market for bionics, & nootropics for medical treatments as
well as non- medical augmentations. Therefore, big
technological companies like Sony, Samsung, Apple, Dell
and others need to look into these new niche of marketing

- 147 -
opportunity instead of just producing ordinary consumer
products for the masses.

I believe the biohacking market will continue to

growserving for medical and non-medical enhancements
into the future; body organs will gradually continue to be
replaced by electro-mechanical devices in a step by step
manner; because who really wants bodies which are super
complicated at the same time super fragile? Super
complicated and super fragile biology is not sustainable; it
needs to be phased out and replaced by electro-mechanics
which is much robust and durable. This will increase the
likelihood of human survival, dominance and facilitate the
ultimate departure into the Cosmos from planet earth in a
suitable build.

Man is an inchoate god. He is like a fledgling

plant that needs protection and nourishment
until he becomes self-sufficient.

1.3 First of all death is a pathophysiologynot a natural

process; second ethics, morality and all political systems
in general could only be relevant if man is finite

If it is possible to turn man into an infinitely intelligent

creature from his current position; then there will be no need
for ethics, morality and political systems altogether; because
there is a strong probability that man can reach the level of
divinity. The limitation of human capability is the one which

- 148 -
creates the state, society and mysticism as I have said so
many times previously. But imagine a world where man at
least can be enhanced to higher level requiring less
imposition and help from the evil triangle; which, augment
his weakness and detain him in a dilapidated position; if there
is ever a purpose to life then I think it has to be the rise of
Homo Deus through capability augmentation and
reinforcement; because why would nature create a universe
and solar system as well as a speck of dust we call earth
surrounded by many odds, cosmic cataclysms and a desert
cosmic environment; but in a strange prospect an oasis in this
cosmic desert supports life and intelligence; various
recreational parks which entertain huge global festivities and
celebrations occur on this tiny rocky planet; earth is in some
sensenot forgetting the current world order is a heaven in a
rough cosmos. It is a party in the middle of a desert; which is
really weird.

So my question is not why there is an earth; but what must be

the end goal of the rise of life on earth? It doesnt have any
meaning if it is just meant to be destroyed when the sun runs
out of fuel; the rise of life on earth needs to have an objective
it must put longevity and even immortality as its final
agenda. We just cannot wave our hands in the air and say
well, what a journey! It is time to die now along with the
sun; brace your selves and kiss every relative as well as every
random citizens on the street goodbye by shedding tears;
frantically, running around in the desperate final moments.

I fervidly reject this lugubrious fate for mankind; I envision

the departure of humanity from Earth either in biological
form or other conducive robotic, mechanical and even
- 149 -
holographic forms in to the cosmos and even into another
universes. Imagine the worlds that awaits our exploration,
and adventure; imagine the numerous surprises that nature
would unveil in our journey through the cosmos; imagine the
worlds with lives; just like our own that we can discover and
most importantly imagine a world of enhanced human
beings; the future must be an eon of bliss and triumph not of
tragedy and death.

I have the same state of mind like Darwin who is quoted by

Prof. Michio Kaku in his book Parallel worlds on chapter
ten; saying:

[Consider] the view now held by most physicists, namely that the sun
with all the planets will in time grow too cold for life, unless indeed some
great body dashes into the sun and thus gives it fresh lifebelieving as I
do that man in the distant future will be a far more perfect creature than
he now is, it is an intolerable thought that he and all other sentient beings
are doomed to complete annihilation after such long-continued slow
progress.

Mysticism as one of the constituents of the evil triangle and

seen as an ethical institution by politicians advocates for
the desinence of life on Earth by mass mortality. They teach
as an ethical principle that suffering is good and dying is a
natural process; so you might as well prepare a grave while
you are still walking around because it might be cheaper now
than later on; this despondent and parochial vision needs to
be precluded from our ethical values. Now what can bring an
end to state, society, mysticism? The answer is simpleit is
the gradual enhancement of man to infinity; The state and the
society are not some eternal necessary entities but the
symptoms of the fallibility of the human organism; who is

- 150 -
finite at this current moment; but when he becomes more
intelligent and most importantly free from his bestial and
irrational self; he will be able to conduct more tasks without
requiring the services provided by other members of the
society. His cries in to space with his tear soaked eyes in
search for a redeemer will be replaced by confidence and
self-esteem; when he becomes closer to infinity; finally when
he reaches the infinity (I mean in intelligence and physical
power) then, there will be no state, society and mysticism
this is the stage of masterdom or the era of Homo Deus.

But what has been mentioned hitherto is currently a

philosophical vision; which can only be materialized by
innovation, experimentation and technology which can only
come out of research and development. Hence, there seems
to be a lot of vacancy for a career in natural science as well
as a lot of Noble prizes up for grabs for those sedulous
innovators who can liberate man from his lowly self, the evil
triangle and death; those scientists who can bring the era of
Homo Deus from the realm of science fiction to reality.

Hence, there is no need in wasting time in debating which

political system is the best or which ethical and moral code is
the greatest; because it does not matter if we apply what we
think is the best system whether it is socialism, capitalism
or celibacy; the root of the problem still lies dormant; which
is the fallibility of man; he is still a beast with an irrational
mind who is screaming to be upgraded and updated. This
overhaul will save us the money we dump on crime
management, drought relief, epidemic control; terrorism,
wars and other myriad issues which manifest due to human
limitations and abhorable design; therefore what I am calling
- 151 -
for is not a medical treatment of humanity but an overall
intelligent redesigning and augmentation of the human
species. So in the struggle to liberate man from finiteness; I
believe there are three steps we must understand and place
under consideration:

Stage 1: Sapiens

Stage 2: Cyborgs

Stage 3: Deus

Now, the first stage have already been accomplished; that is

why a mutant Chimpanzee is writing this article right now
i.e. me; the second stage is partially being accomplished as
there are many cyborgs who live among as already with extra
senses and more physical vigor; but the third stage may look
like a tall order but I can never rule it out; there is a
possibility that man can reach the stage of divinity; because
the logical outcome and consequence of perpetual
augmentation is infinity.

Now, when we come to the issue of ethics and moral codes;

they are incapable of restricting the animal passions of man
even if they do they cannot make him happy because he is
forced to act in contrary to his nature and design ; hence, he
will be lugubrious and impaired; therefore, a radical re-
engineering of a new species at the cellular level who will
progressively be self-sufficient without a need for the state,
society and mysticism must be created to provide our
universe with real tangible, persistent and eternal solution;
which will bring an end to the competition of states and the
Darwinian natural order which is currently in place.
- 152 -
Therefore, we should always remember that the state, the
society and mysticism are the symptoms of a disease which is
human finiteness and fallibility; they are not a necessity that
man cannot live without; the ethics, morality and political
systems set in place are incapable of treating the disease but
only attempt to treat the symptoms in an effort to make
human existence blissful and progressive; but they
(communism, capitalism, socialism, other ethical and social
codes) have failed miserably in managing humanities
concerns; because the disease still exists; which is as said
above human finiteness and his abhorable design.

I have never heard a single natural law which states that it is

impossible to create a utopia by enhancing man to infinity
and we have evolved to suffer and die on earth. May be I am
misinformed; if so I am always corrigible. But anyways, we
must give a try to transhumanism as we have tried capitalism,
communism and socialism; I have a huge hope that this
theory is the one which is really capable of creating a better
world and a mirthful transhumanist existence bringing an end
to the state, the society and mysticismeliminating the need
for ethics, morality and all political systems.

- 153 -
 IV-In defense of ethical self-existence

1.1 The threat of belief systems to longevity, immortality

and human happiness

Extreme believers are more dangerous than normal believers

because they will be the ones experiencing symptoms of
schizophrenia i.e. images and voices just like Abraham;
which makes them think that there is another dimension.
Hence, they are more convinced about their beliefs than
ordinary believerswho are just nave into thinking that
there is another world. Extreme believers are a huge treat for
the wellbeing of any society; hence, they must be closely
watched and monitored not to inflict violence on themselves
or on others. These individuals will be experiencing one of
the delusions called the god delusion which is not yet
incorporated into the DSM-5 manual but which should
bebecause it is the source of irrationality, terrorism, child
abuse and other societal ills that we behold today. The other
problem with a belief system which is concocted by shallow
charlatans and imperialists is that it opens the door for the
exploitation of nave individuals who do not understand the
corrupt nature of all belief systems in general as I have said
elsewhere. In addition, if we observe the background of
believers and mystics in general most and all of them were
shallow and nave individuals before they converted into
believers. In order to accept mythology as fact like an idiot
one has to be a simpleton and that is exactly what all
believers are. The founders of mythology study other
mythologies before them and establish their own
mythological systems based on inspirations they acquire
from their predecessors Muhammad studied Christianity
- 154 -
thoroughly before he invented what he called Islam; founders
of Christianity studied ancient Sumerian as well as
Mesopotamian mythical systems before establishing
Christianity. This is how mythology evolves and ramifies
throughout history. It is founded on the shoulders of
simpletons and buds from the stem of ancient mythology. A
belief system and force always go hand in hand or in tandem
as Ayn rand stated in her book Faith and force: The
destroyers of the modern world; because, in order to gain
acceptance by the public formulators of belief systems
always use emotional and physical force in order to
propagate their unreasonable and unverified or sometimes
unverifiable claims. The only way to promote claptrap is by
sensationalism and physical force because their claims do not
exist in reality. Therefore, as a thesis I would say belief
systems make people emotional, belligerent, and psychotic;
there would be no need for belief systems, violence and
threnodies if men understood their weak nature i.e. self-
realize and became self-sufficient.

I should ask the question: Should we ever wonder why our

world today is inundated in so much violence and nihilism?
Absolutely not, because the source of all violence is belief
and the vagary which follows it rather than fact and reason
even though there are other reasons which can be sources of
violence as well. I absolutely understand that the current
stage of evolution on the planet is temporary as time moves
forward the next creatures that will inherit earth and the
Cosmos are expected to be more rational and more powerful
i.e. intellectually and physically than puny man who invents
ideal characters and establishes superstition like a little boy
to compensate for his frail mental and physical powers. But
- 155 -
until that time as long as Homo sapiens dominate the planet
and to ameliorate the damages done by our weakness and
monkey genes; there will be a need for teaching people that
nature is complete and the reason that they create ideal
characters and belief systems is due to their limitations.
Therefore, instead of falling victim to superstitionthey
should be advised to eliminate their weaknesses by means of
natural understanding as much as they can. I think this is the
only method to save humanity until they reach the stage of
omniscience.

If you have observed closely just having the feeling of a

racist attitude will trigger the attitude of racism on the other
side of the fence. Having the feeling of imperialism will
alarm others into becoming imperialists themselves; hatred
creates more hatred; vindictiveness creates more revenge;
love and compassion creates harmony; extreme communism
creates radical capitalism; radical capitalism creates radical
socialism; maleficence pushes people away and beneficence
attracts people. Now, if peoples attitudes, their thoughts and
feelings are responsible for their practical experiences then
where does the so called supernatural god come into action?
If nature is self-automated; how is it possible for anything
super to exist? Isnt the above example enough evidence to
suggest that nature itself is god? Go out on an experiment to
test the idea that nature is complete and human nature itself is
responsible for all manifestations on earth rather than a
supernatural god. Your feelings, thoughts, attitude, mood
and over all physiology influences reality not in an idealistic
manner but in an objective manner and is also influenced
by the outside world. Hence, we can say that nature as a
whole is a self-determining and self-directing force. I think
- 156 -
this is the reason that Aristotle made self-realization or self-
development the correct path towards creating a better
society. Here, we must take an important note that when
Aristotle said self-realization he meant reaching your
maximum potential which has a similar definition with self-
enhancement or Transhumanism but in order to reach self-
enhancement first one has to understand his nature; thus,
when I use the term self-realization I do not mean self-
development but self-understanding. Having an insight into
how your mind and body works i.e. your physiology. So that
it will easy for you to enhance it if you have the
technology or manage it. Because, if people understand their
nature; then, they can self-regulate their behavior to create a
harmonious society. If they understand that they are animals!
With selfishness, belligerence and other animal characters;
then, it will be easy to solve all social issues because
accepting the problem is part of the solution.

Therefore, as a conclusionbelief systems in the first place

manifest due to the limited brain capacity of human beings
which restricts them from solving their disease, cleaning their
environment and defeating death. In addition, the
obliviousness about self-realization or understanding ones
nature as a determining force which should have
compelled people to upgrade itintellectually and physically
in order to become self-sufficient are the major causes for the
creation of belief systems in history and the danger that they
pose for mankind. In order to eliminate this danger posed by
belief systems to mental, emotional, physical, social and
economic wellbeing of the individual and society as a whole
first we need to eliminate the creator of belief systems which

- 157 -
is mans limited brain capacity and the lack of self-
understanding.

The struggle between materialists and mystics,

immortalists and mortalists is the most
prominent struggle in life. I would like to place
myself in the right side of history by promoting
self-existence and that is why I founded
amystology as an antonym of mysticism and its
mortalist culture. I think we must advocate the
philosophy of eternity even if the technology does
not exist or at least until it exists.

- 158 -
Glossary: Terms and definitions in amystology

Ammactivity: is a terminology which defines the

incapability of something immaterial to interact with
something material due to their incompatible nature. Thus,
can never be responsible for its animation or creation.

Banemania: A state of self-destruction in a state of irrational

whimism, irritability, violence and vagary.

The Bin-laden effect: A state of corruption due to an illusion

of reality induced by impostors via emotional and
psychological cajoles.

The bogswa state: The state of helplessness and wondering

in a swamp of perplexion as is seen in the behaviors of the
followers of Pseudo-cults.

Delusion: The state of perceiving non-existent entities due to

organic or other causes of mental illness. (A professional and
detailed explanation may be acquired from The DSM-book
series: Diagnostical and statistical manual of mental
disorders.)

The god delusion: a form of delusional disorder in which

patients experience exhotatory messages from a character
called godwhich are thought of as revelations which in
fact they are really symptoms of a severe biological disorder
of the brain; which leads to the manifestation of both
positive as well as negative symptoms of schizophrenia.

Derelectism: The state of abandoning the individual to be as

he chooses without any psychological, emotional, physical,
economical, and social pressure, constraints and
- 159 -
totalitarianism. This is a state where the individual is
dignified and is free from fear.

The divergent fallacy: An error in thought where due to the

short comings in understanding reality, attributes are paid to
causes which are even more obscure.

Example: Because we cannot account what the consciousness

is yet, we label consciousness with even more obscure terms
calling it a spirit and so on instead of diving deeper into
nature to figure out what it is and how it came about.

Dualistic mysticism: In this level of mysticism the

individual seems to be entangled between orthodox
materialism and heretic mysticism. He can be a Idolatric
mystic who thinks that either nature can be personified to
have a dialogue with ; or, a spiritual mystic who believes
that; it is a useless heap of dead matter without an essence
moved by what he calls a spirit that he created We must
understand and signify the irrational position of a dualist. He
is an individual who states on one hand that nature is self-
existent; moving herself by laws embracing realism and on
the other he states that it is a heap of dead matter without an
essence moved by a spirit which he cannot explain without
a contradiction and provide a palpable attestment for.

Ebeism: evidence based existence.

Eusciences: true sciences with demonstration and efficacy.

The fallacy of misplaced attribution: This is an act of

attributing responsibilities for irresponsible causers.

- 160 -
Example: God created the universe; diseases are punishment
from the gods; mental illnesses are caused by spirits, demons,
jinn etc.

The fallacy of glookism: This term denotes an action of

avoidance of cogent and vivid evidence presented forth due
to a bias in psychological, emotional, economic or other
interests. The individual avoids the clear evidence in vagary
rather than discredit it with equivalent evidence to its
contrary.

Heretic mysticism: A state of divergence from the true

nature of reality towards spiritual nonsense.

Idolatry mysticism: The mystification of natural objects like

trees, sun, oceans, thunder, statues, animals, etc. These
people are called polytheists who have personified and
mystified natural components; in an attempt to open a
channel of dialogue and amend their condition. These people
can at least see what they have ended up called gods
physically so they are not in a worse condition than spiritual
mystics even though they are as misdirected as spiritualists
who have abandoned nature altogether for spiritualism.

The inherency principle: This is the most important

principle in amystology which states that nature/matter exists
and moves itself due to its own inherent essence. There
cannot be an entity without an essence and there cannot be an
essence without and entity. For example, a pen has an
essence called writing. A pen without writing is meaningless!
And can never exist because it is writing which makes an
entity called Pen to exist. The essences of entities determine
what they are? What they do? And what they will be? Hence,
- 161 -
simply stated the inherency principle is stated as: existence
begets essence and essence determines existence.

Intelagnos: Natural ignorance.

Intelgnos: Natural understanding.

The minus principle: This principle states that people are

more credulous to nonsense when they are less empowered
and highly skeptical when they are more empowered. We
must put under consideration that education and
empowerment are two different things. People may be skilled
in certain areas but are ignorant in other areas these people
are not empowered but educated. It is only when an
individual possesses several skills in several areas that we
call him an empowered man.

Martyrdom: An act of nihilistic self-sacrifice to a fictional

deity or cult leader.

Masterdom: total understanding of the natural world;

pansophy or omnipotence.

Material fetishism: An irrational affinity for superstitious

material objects like the cross, Kabba or other similar
physical statues.

The misplaced expectation: This is the attitude of

pseudoscientists where unreal expectations are begotten from
an already unreal system.

The nature of reality: The state of truth which we can infer

from observing the natural world.

- 162 -
Natural absolutism: This is the most important concept and
foundation in amystology which states that nature is
complete or in other worlds nature is absolute. There is
nothing beyond nature; nature is the sole metaphysical truth
and we need pure reason in order to engage it.

Natural mysticism: In this scenario the individual has

embraced natural absolutism rejecting anything
supernatural as a form of delusion and disorder but his
method of engagement with nature is mystical. This makes
him right in metaphysics but terrible wrong in epistemology.
Natural mysticism is benign in consideration with
supernatural mysticism where in super natural mysticism the
individual is totally psychotic due to his rejection of the only
dimension in existence which is nature. But, in natural
mysticism at least he has embraced natural absolutism thus
the only thing left for him to do is to be rational in his
engagement with nature. Thus, natural mysticism can be
tolerated even if someone becomes grateful, adulatory, calls
nature by name as a god and even worships it and establishes
a mystical relationship with nature; but, he should never be
encouraged to go down that route because all observation
suggests that only rational relationship with nature bears
fruit in augmenting the quality of life. It must also be
remembered that natural mysticism has only emotional relief
than practical solutions on the ground; that is the reason why
we need to be rational in order to provide practical solutions
to our challenges.

Example: examples of natural mysticism include paganism,

pantheism, Leninism Marxism, astrology, biocentrism, the
law of attractionism etc.
- 163 -
Nebeism: non-evidence based existence.

The orthoher graph: The name orthoher comes from two

words orthodoxy and heresy. This graph was developed to
show the orthodoxy and heresy of human behavior from the
nature of reality; while, he is in action. It analyzes whether he
is practicing eusciences or pseudosciences and whether his
life is progressing towards masterdom or martyrdom.

Orthodox materialism: A state of pure reason and

naturalism without any duality.

Pseudosciences: fallacious school of thoughts and doctrines.

Pseudoscientists: Individuals who are experts on inane and

non-evident systems.

Pseudo-victim: An individual who is the victim of a

pseudoscience.

Pseudo-vituperation: This is an attempt to denigrate and

spurn the natural world because it is challenging, and
intricate; to divert into systematic floundering and
derangement towards a pseudoscience.

The red-outburst: A prejudiced and overwhelming agitation

and wrath in defense of a pseudoscience.

Salubrism: This is the ethical principle of amystology which

states that the individual should maintain his salubrity in
three spectrums as much as he can namely psychologically,
emotionally, and physically; in opposition to mystical
teachings of self-mortification.

- 164 -
The Sezlers phenomenon: This is a designation which states
that people are more often enthusiastic votaries/exponents of
something they think they know but never understand.

Spiritual mysticism: The denigration and abandonment of

nature for a spirit which is considered by the believer as the
influencer of nature. In this attitude and state the mystics
assign a spirit outside of nature and try to influence it by
invoking this entity that they created. This stage of mysticism
is extremely dangerous and the worst form of mysticism
because these mystics are not in touch with reality. They
have not only rejected the materialistic nature of nature but
have detached themselves from what they are i.e. material
beings in order to influence and understand the natural world.
Hence, they are more likely to suffer from delusional and
psychotic disorders.

The state of compulsivity: An irresistible pulse to subjugate

mankind by totalitarianism to a particular pseudoscience or
volition.

Supernatural mysticism: is a form of mysticism where the

individual is both erroneous in his metaphysics as well as his
epistemology. He thinks there is an immaterial world that he
is incapable of understanding. He abandons nature; which
includes him for a non-existent dimension. He is nescient of
his material mind which incapable of understanding anything
immaterial. Thus, makes a big error in metaphysics as well as
epistemology.

Example: all systems and doctrines based on immaterialism

like Christianity, Islam, and so forth.

- 165 -