Professional Documents
Culture Documents
a
< . , MARnfB I'IGRTttIl ATTACK 1IQtJAl)1QM 121.
~
. . -
'r
.' M.UIMB A!~ GIltltIP U
BOX "no
D
_.
'
. ,..
~ Aa ISJ~"'2'O
, '." ' ..,' .. u,'" _ w'
1100
CO
1 Aug 16
~i ioD Co.mander: 3
Package C~r: 7
Tactical Mantor: ~
The F-3S performed very well acro.s the apectrum of mission sets including
escort, Btrike, and suppres.ion of ene.y air defenees (SRAD). The limited
number of fifth generation aircraft lor the eaeort roll required the fighter
integration (lI) of fourth generation tp-~51 and fifth generation IP-22/P-J5)
ts. In the escort role, the F-35 waD both lethal and survivable in
contested enviroDNent against highly trained aggressor.. The aircraft
sensors were extremely ~fective at providing pilots a high degree of
sityational ewarene88 to the air picture.
The 7-35 i8 extr~ely capable acros. aeveral .i.sion sets . Aa the axsrcise
progresaed. this beca. . very evident to the other participants and we ~ere
ked to fill Beveral roles in addition to the ATe fragged aaalgnmenta. The
uci11ty of the P-35 led to eeam1esa tranaitioDa from an escort, .tri~e or SEAn
rolss throughout the vul.
one particular area where the P-lS performed extre_ely well was the ability to
use the aircraft's bigh fidelity sensors to ahare data over Link-16 with
fourth generation et. with less capable sanaors/radars. This typs of 000-
kinetic .uppor~ was a force multiplier and enabled fourth generation cort
a ta to 'be ~ore lethal and survivable. In many cases, the P-35 had fuel
2
Bubj: EXE:CO'TIVE StlMMARY OP VHFA-l.21 SUPPORT OF RED FLAG 16-3
remil,ining after the air to air load-out was expended and ...,... ble to rem.Lin on
station to support other aaseta Don-kinetically . It is important to note
that for this exercise, there .....er. no airborne tanker a.s.t.e that were
configured to service N"VY/Marine COrps aircraft with the prObe and ~
refueling syatern. Most of t.he USAF aasets ....d. use of airborne refueling to
enh.iI.nC9. tilnll! on sta.tion .
In .. dedicated strike role, the F-35 had the ability to locate targets at long
ranges and conduct simulated strikes ~ithin tbe limitations of our current.
weapons (GBU-12!GBU-33) envelopes. Lack of stand-off waapon in this
current software configuration continue a to be one of our biggest limiting
factors.
The low observable charace.ristiCB of the aircraft were very effective and
facilitated a much broader access and freedom of maneuver in comparison to
1@g8cy platforms, The aircraft were in the aoat. effective configuration for
signature ~anagement. Training in this configuration is critical. aa it
allowa pilots learn to effectively e.ploy the aircraft ..s well as tru.t the
low observable signature.
Overall. the F-35 ~a. tar more survivable then the participating legacy
aircraft. Debrief analysis of each F-35 los. was either the result of a
pilot'S individual employaent error or the result of a acenario/airspace
linitaeion. Due to the large number of aaseta involved, pilots were, liaited
to a 1000 foot altitude block, Block adherence acd no-fly areBS within the
range complex prohibited pilote fro~ positioning themsalves in the moat lethal
or survivable position. Even with those restrictions, it was extremely
difficult for the opposing red force to acquire and succe.sfully en~age F-35a.
As the squadron conmander, 7 alll e~tremely proud at the buable profe33ionalism
we brought to this exercise, OUr 1Ill1nt~ce depart1llent worked bard and
delivered coJlbat capable aircraft for every vul. OUr pilots seatUea81y
integrated with other aircrew and cybar/apace operatoro. We capitalized on
our opportunities to lead the events as Mi ion Combanders, Package
Conmandera. and Tactical Mentors . Moat notably. our pilots were the Mission
commander s for the evant ~ith the MOat capable eneMY threat laydown as well
all the VIP event with the Secretary of the Air Porca and OSAF Chief of St.aff
present. Thia was tbe firat Red Flag exercia. with F-JS participation and the
USMC lead frOID the front.
or