Professional Documents
Culture Documents
DIgSILENT PowerFactory
The 39 Bus New England System is a simpli- Data have been taken from [1] and have
fied model of the high voltage transmission been completed with data taken from [5, 6]
system in the northeast of the U.S.A. (New for the PowerFactory model of the 38 Bus
England area). It was presented for the first New England System. Additional data not
time in 1970 and has since been often used available in [1, 5, 6] have been assumed
for scientific research and publications. This by DIgSILENT (e.g. nominal voltages). The
paper describes the PowerFactory model of model only contains data for a balanced net-
the 39 Bus New England System and its pa- work representation (positive sequence).
rameters as provided by DIgSILENT . Re-
sults of the steady-state power flow are given It is stated in [1] that the data are taken from
and plots generated from time-domain stabil- [2]. With respect to network data, [2] refers
ity simulations are shown as examples. to [3, 4], which are the original data sources
for the 39 Bus New England System.
The nominal frequency of the New England The loads are not voltage-dependent, but
transmission system is 60 Hz and the mains have constant active and reactive power de-
voltage level is 345 kV (nominal voltage). For mand. Please note that this is achieved by
nodes at a different voltage level, the follow- disabling the load option Consider Voltage
ing nominal voltages have been assumed for Dependency of Loads in the PowerFactory
the PowerFactory model: load flow calculation command. Load data
(active power P and reactive power Q) have
been taken from [1] and are listed in Table 1.
Bus 12: 138 kV
DIgSILENT
G 08
Type Gen 08
~
SG
Bus 37 Line 26 - 29
Line Type 26 - 29
Trf 25 - 37
Out of Calc ulation G 10
Type Gen 10 Line 26 - 28 Line 28 - 29
De-energized Line Type 26 - 28 Line Type 28 - 29
~
SG
Voltage Levels
345, kV
230, kV
Bus 25 Bus 26 Bus 28 Bus 29
138, kV
16,5 kV Bus 30
Line Type 02 - 25
Trf 29 - 38
Line 25 - 26
Line 02 - 25
Line Type 25 - 26
Trf 02 - 30
Load 25 Load 28
General Load Type General Load Type
Bus 27
Bus 38
Line Type 17 - 27
Bus 02 Line 17 - 18
Line 17 - 27
Line Type 17 - 18
Line Type 01 - 02
Load 27 Bus 24 SG
~
Line 01 - 02
Line Type 02 - 03
Line 02 - 03
Line Type 03 - 18
Line Type 16 - 24
Load 24
Line 03 - 18
Line 16 - 24
General Load Type
Line Type 16 - 17
Bus 01
Line 16 - 17
Load 18
General Load Type
G 06
Type Gen 06
~
SG
Bus 03
Bus 16
Bus 35
Line Type 01 - 39
Line Type 15 - 16
Line 01 - 39
Line 15 - 16
Line Type 16 - 21
Load 03
Line 03 - 04
Line 16 - 21
General Load Type
Trf 22 - 35
Interconnection to Load 16 Line 21 - 22
Load 04 General Load Type Line Type 21 - 22
Rest of U.S.A. / Canada General Load Type
G 01
Type Gen 01 Line 04 - 14 Bus 15
Line Type 04 - 14
~
Line Type 23 - 24
SG
Line 23 - 24
Line Type 14 - 15
Bus 21 Bus 22
Line 14 - 15
Bus 04
Line Type 16 - 19
Load 15
Line 16 - 19
General Load Type
Line Type 04 - 05
Bus 39
Line 04 - 05
Bus 14 Load 21
General Load Type
Line Type 22 - 23
Line 22 - 23
Load 39 Bus 05
General Load Type Load 12
General Load Type
Line Type 05 - 06
Line 05 - 06
Load 23
Line Type 13 - 14
General Load Type
Line 13 - 14
Bus 12
Bus 06
Trf Type 13 - 12 YNy0
Line Type 06 - 07
Bus 19 Bus 23
Line 06 - 07
Trf 13 - 12
Line 05 - 08
Line Type 09 - 39
Line Type 06 - 11
Trf 11 - 12
Line 06 - 11
Load 20
Trf 19 - 20
Trf 23 - 36
General Load Type
Bus 07
Trf Type 06 - 31 YNy0
Bus 13
Trf 19 - 33
Line Type 07 - 08
Line 07 - 08
Trf 20 - 34
SG
~
Bus 08 G 07
Type Gen 07
Line Type 08 - 09
Bus 31
Line 08 - 09
Swing Node
Trf Type 10 - 32 YNy0
Load 08
General Load Type
SG
Trf 10 - 32
~
Bus 09 G 02 Load 31 SG SG
Type Gen 02 General Load Type ~ ~
G 05 G 04
Type Gen 05 Type Gen 04
Bus 32
tem (U.S. and Canadian) and is therefore di- ble 4. The rated current of each line is not
rectly connected at the 345 kV level. All other known and is therefore assumed to be 1 kA.
generators are connected via transformers.
Generator G 02 is the slack element of
the network model, therefore voltage magni-
tude and voltage angle are given (0.982 p.u., 2.1.4 Transformers
0.0 degrees). For the other generators, ac-
tive power dispatch and controlled voltage Transformer data are given in per unit (p.u.)
magnitude at their terminals are given. The as represented in Table 5 based on 100 MVA
data have been taken from [1] and are listed [1]. For the PowerFactory model realistic rat-
in Table 2. ings have been assumed in accordance with
generator ratings (see Section 2.2.2) and the
parameters recalculated based on these rat-
2.1.3 Transmission Lines ings. Transformer parameters of the Power-
Factory model are given in Table 6. In ad-
dition, tap changers are modelled in order
Line data are given in per unit (p.u.) based to achieve the transformer taps as given in
on 100 MVA as represented in Table 3, with- Table 5. Transformer Trf 20 - 34 is repre-
out information about the line length [1]. For sented by 2 parallel transformers with a rated
the PowerFactory model input data are re- power of 300 MVA each.
quired in /km and F/km, respectively. Line
data have been recalculated for the network The vector group of all transformers has
model with a nominal voltage of 345 kV and been assumed to be YNy0, in order to obtain
a nominal frequency of 60 Hz. As no line results of the bus voltage angles which are
length is provided in [1], the length of each consistent with results given in the literature,
line in the PowerFactory model has been es- for example as in [7]. More realistic trans-
timated using the assumption that the reac- former vector groups (YNd) are available in
tance per length is 0.3 /km. Line data used alternative transformer types, which can be
in the PowerFactory model are shown in Ta- used by activating the Variation YNd Trans-
Transient stability is ensured for all gen- [4] G. W. Bills et al.: On-Line Stability
erators. Figure 6 shows the speed of the Analysis Study, RP90-1 Report for the
synchronous generators. Edison Electric Institute, October 12,
1970
Simulation Fault Line 2-3 Unstable:
A short-circuit at the beginning of Line [5] Website of the IEEE PES PS-
02 - 03 is simulated and cleared after DPC SCS, Task Force on Bench-
250 ms by switching off the faulted line. mark Systems for Stability Con-
The speed of the generators is shown trols, Power System Test Cases:
in Figure 7. Generator G 09 becomes http://www.sel.eesc.usp.br/ieee/index.htm
unstable (transient instability).
[6] Website of the IEEE PES PSDPC
SCS, Task Force on Benchmark Sys-
tems for Stability Controls: IEEE
3.2.2 Modal Analysis 10 Generator 39 Bus System,
http://www.sel.eesc.usp.br/ieee/IEEE39/
To run a small signal analysis (Eigenvalue or main.htm (downloaded in March 2014)
Modal Analysis), in PowerFactory the Modal
Analysis toolbar has to be selected as shown [7] Website of the IEEE PES PSDPC
in Figure 8. SCS, Task Force on Benchmark
Systems for Stability Controls: 39
The equation system has to be initialized bus system Base Case and PDF-
(button Calculate Initial Conditions ), be- document 39bus.out (39bus.pdf),
fore the calculation of the eigenvalues can http://www.sel.eesc.usp.br/ieee/IEEE39/
be executed by pressing the button Modal base.htm (downloaded in May 2014)
Analysis ( ). The study case Small Signal
[8] DIgSILENT PowerFactory : Technical
Analysis (Eigenvalues) contains an eigen-
Reference Documentation - General
value plot which displays the results (see
Load, Gomaringen, Germany, 2013
Figure 9 for results without Power System
Stabilizers). It is possible to add further di-
agrams for depicting the controllability, ob-
servability, and participation of each eigen-
value.
References
-5,0
10,0
0,97
0,99
1,01
1,03
1,05
1,07
-15,0
-10,0
Bu Bu
s0 s0
Bu 1 Bu 1
s0 s0
Bu 2 Bu 2
s0 s0
Bu 3 Bu 3
s0 s0
Bu 4 Bu 4
s0 s0
Bu 5 Bu 5
s0 s0
Bu 6 Bu 6
s0 s0
Bu 7 Bu 7
s0 s0
Bu 8 Bu 8
s0 s0
Bu 9 Bu 9
Bu 0 Bu 0
s1 s1
6
39 Bus New England System
DIgSILENT
1250,0
1000,0
750,0
500,0
250,0
0,0
01
02
03
04
05
06
07
08
09
10
G
G
Active Power in MW
250,0
200,0
150,0
100,0
50,0
0,0
01
02
03
04
05
06
07
08
09
10
G
G
Reactive Power in Mvar
DIgSILENT
1,08
1,06
1,04
1,02
1,00
0,98
0,00 1,00 2,00 3,00 4,00 [s] 5,00
G 01: Speed in p.u.
G 02: Speed in p.u.
G 03: Speed in p.u.
G 04: Speed in p.u.
G 05: Speed in p.u.
G 06: Speed in p.u.
G 07: Speed in p.u.
G 08: Speed in p.u.
G 09: Speed in p.u.
G 10: Speed in p.u.
Figure 6: Speed of generators in the case of a fault on Line 02 - 03, cleared by switching off
the line after 230 ms
DIgSILENT
1,08
1,06
1,04
1,02
1,00
0,98
0,00 1,00 2,00 3,00 4,00 [s] 5,00
G 01: Speed in p.u.
G 02: Speed in p.u.
G 03: Speed in p.u.
G 04: Speed in p.u.
G 05: Speed in p.u.
G 06: Speed in p.u.
G 07: Speed in p.u.
G 08: Speed in p.u.
G 09: Speed in p.u.
G 10: Speed in p.u.
Figure 7: Speed of generators in the case of a fault on Line 02 - 03, cleared by switching off
the line after 250 ms
DIgSILENT
10,00
6,000
2,000
-2,000
-6,000
-10,00
Stable Eigenvalues
Unstable Eigenvalues
Table 6: Data of transformers in the PowerFactory model (in addition transformer taps according
to Table 5)
Table 7: Data of generators given in [1, 6] based on 100 MVA (subtransient data taken from [6])