Professional Documents
Culture Documents
H I G H L I G H T S
l From the President 03
l SMTP Organised by HQ/RCs/Chapters 04
l Academic Guidance 05
Examiners' Observations on Performance of Examinees 22
(December 2005 Examination)
l Legal World 27
l Students Services 30
l Students Quiz 34
l Schedule of Academic Development Programmes 36
l Schedule of Training Orientation Programmes 36
l News and Announcements 38
Yours sincerely,
(H M Choraria)
choraria123@vsnl.net
Kolkata
April 13, 2006
Banks are required to classify the loan assets (advances) into More than three years
four categories viz: (i) outstanding stock of NPAs - 60 per cent with effect
(i) Standard Assets; as on March 31, 2004 from March 31, 2005
- 75 per cent with effect
(ii) Sub-standard Assets; from March 31, 2006
(iii) Doubtful Assets; and - 100 per cent with effect
(iv) Loss Assets. from March 31, 2007
(ii) advances classified as 100 percent with effect from
(i) Standard Assets : Standard asset is one which does not 'doubtful more than three years] March 31,2005
disclose, any problem and which does not carry more than normal
on or after April 1, 2004
risk attached to the business. Such asset is considered as
performing asset. (iv) Loss Assets: The entire assets should be written off or if the
assets are to be retained in the books for any reason, 100%
(ii) Subs-standard Assets : Sub-standard asset is one which has
provision is required to be made.
remained as non-performing asset (NPA) for a period less than
or equal to 12 months. There is no promise of recovering the Note: Provision towards standard assets should not be deducted
dues in full, having regard to the value of security or current from advances but shown separately as contingent provsions against
networth of the borrower/guarantor, hence the possibility of loss standard assets under "Other Liabilities and Provisions" - 'Others' in
Schedule V of the Balance Sheet.
The December 2005 session of the Company Secretary Course 9 Human Resource Management
Examination was held from 26th December 2005 to 3rd January 2006. and Industrial Relations 43.3 18.3
The pass percentage for all papers of both Intermediate and Final
Courses have been compiled and given in Table A hereunder for the INTERMEDIATE COURSE
information of the students. Though the pass percentage showed
1. GENERAL AND COMMERCIAL LAWS
good performance by the candidates in most of the papers, some
candidates were not able to clear the examination due to various On the basis of the form, content and quality of the answers given,
drawbacks in their answers. Therefore, it would be beneficial for these it appeared that a considerable percentage of the candidates had not
candidates to know the general weakness/drawbacks in their answers. prepared for the examination seriously. They had prepared on selective
Although, it is not possible to give comments on each and every basis as some of the answers given by them were quite good and
candidates answer scripts, some common drawbacks based on the rest were hopeless. The candidates displayed poor knowledge in
comments and observations noted by the examiners have been culled Constitutional Law. Most of the candidates even did not know the
and given paper-wise hereunder for information of the candidates so fundamental aspects of Indian Constitution. Many failed to mention
as to enable them to overcome their deficiencies and improve their relevant legal provisions and could not give sound legal reasoning
performance in the forthcoming examination. while dealing with problem-oriented questions.
Table A Question No.1 being compulsory, most of the candidates
attempted part (a) upto the mark. The doctrine of colourable legislation
Statement Showing the Pass Percentage of Papers in in 1(c) and writ of certiorari in 1(c) were answered poorly as the
December 2005 Examination candidates could not understand the theme of the questions. Part (a)
Subjects Percentage of and (b) of Question No.2 were attempted satisfactorily by most of the
Candidates Secured candidates but many failed to appreciate the doctrine of feeding the
40 to 49 50 % and grant by estoppel in Question No. 2(c). The performance in Question
% marks above marks No.3 and 4 was not up the mark. Most of the candidates seemed to
be ignorant about the term actionable claim. Question No.4 (b) (ii)
INTERMEDIATE COURSE was not answered well. Systematic and logical presentation was
lacking. In Question No.5, the questions pertaining to I.T.Act were
1 General and Commercial Laws 30.9 28.0 well attempted. However many confused for place of registration in
2 Company Accounts and Cost 22.6 10.8 part (b) with kinds of registration. Question No.6 (b) was not answered
& Management Accounting satisfactorily by many. Question No.7 was well answered. Some
candidates did exceedingly well displaying keen interest in problem
3 Tax Laws 26.9 12.8 solving. Majority of the candidates performed average in Question
4 Management Information Systems 34.2 26.9 No.8 (a) and 8(b). Part (c) of the question was attempted poorly by
and Corporate Communication majority displaying lack of clarity of concept.
5 Company Law 34.0 21.9 Candidates are advised to read the subject seriously. They should
read Bare Acts and latest case laws to have knowledge about the
6 Company Secretarial Practice 36.7 21.0 legal provisions as well the latest judicial decisions. It is absolutely
7 Economic, Labour and Industrial Laws 36.9 12.2 necessary for solving problems based questions. While dealing with
problem-oriented questions, quote relevant legal provisions and
8 Securities Laws and Regulation 33.5 30.6
support your answers by giving sound legal reasoning. They are
of Financial Markets
advised to read Student Company Secretary, Chartered Secretary
FINAL COURSE and other professional Journals to improve their communication skills
1 Advanced Company Law 45.1 12.3 as well as update their knowledge on the subject.
and Practice 2. COMPANY ACCOUNTS AND COST &
2 Secretarial Practice Relating to 44.0 25.5 MANAGEMENT ACCOUNTING
Economic Laws and Drafting & Candidates showed very poor performance in this paper as only
Conveyancing 33.4 percent of the candidates could secure 40 percent or more marks.
This paper being practical oriented candidates could have scored
3 Secretarial, Management and 43.4 35.5
high marks had they taken the examination with thorough preparation
Systems Audit
and desired seriousness. Clarity in understanding of basic concepts,
4 Financial, Treasury and Forex 40.7 19.8 and fundamental principles of company accounts and cost accounting
Management was missing in most of the answers. Candidates had taken the
5 Corporate Restructuring 43.7 29.9 examination in a casual manner without proper preparation. Many
candidates had given generalized answers instead of specific and
Law and Practice
logical answers. Majority of the candidates put up a halfhearted
6 Banking and Insurance 33.1 52.4 approach and they could not answer all the questions in the stipulated
Law and Practice time. Candidates exposure in solving practical questions was very
shallow though some candidates were able to put a brave face in
*Compiled from Examiners Report. theoretical questions.
Attention Students!
5. 5 1225 EU0089667 SWETA BAJAJ (MS.), 32. 18 7944 WU0141564 SUMEET RAMESHWAR
KOLKATA SABU, NASHIK
6. 6 5488 SU0081514 MADHUMITHA M (MS.), 33. 19 1091 EU0087637 MOHIT KEJRIWAL,
CHENNAI KOLKATA
7. 7 1409 EU0092747 MINI BAGARIA (MS.), 34. 19 1261 EU0090313 ATISH KUMAR SINGH,
KOLKATA KOLKATA
8. 7 3928 NU0239124 AKASH PHOPHALIA, 35. 19 2128 NU0240115 SANCHI AGARWAL (MS.),
JODHPUR AGRA
9. 7 5320 SU0079154 SUSHMA A S (MS.), 36. 19 2740 NU0206009 ANURADHA SINGHANIA
BANGALORE (MS.), DELHI
10. 8 5453 SU0080507 NAGARAJ B S, CHENNAI 37. 20 2894 NU0239528 RICHA MUNUJA (MS.),
11. 8 6800 WU0141651 SRINATH NARASIMHAN, DELHI
MUMBAI 38. 20 3346 NU0228692 VIPUL AGARWAL, DELHI
12. 9 1223 EU0089611 ANKIT MATHRAN, KOLKATA 39. 20 5730 SU0078269 LALITHA R (MS.),
13. 9 6037 SU0080580 MOTHI HAREESH V, HYDERABAD
TIRUCHIRAPALLI 40. 21 1249 EU0090195 SUMIT RUNGTA, KOLKATA
14. 10 1415 EU0092811 MOHIT JAIN, KOLKATA
41. 22 1239 EU0090068 AMIT SARAF, KOLKATA
15. 11 1414 EU0092806 SANDEEP AGARWAL,
42. 22 1277 EU0090498 RITIKA RATHI (MS.),
KOLKATA
KOLKATA
16. 12 856 EU0075371 NEHA DUGAR (MS.),
43. 22 5433 SU0077963 BHUVANASUNDAR S ,
KOLKATA
CHENNAI
17. 12 1407 EU0092710 PANKAJ CHOUDHARY,
KOLKATA 44. 22 5445 SU0079234 SWETHA T V (MS.),
CHENNAI
18. 12 3356 NU0229668 NISHA AGGARWAL (MS.),
DELHI 45. 23 1075 EU0087313 DIPTI BAJAJ (MS.),
KOLKATA
19. 12 5456 SU0080561 SNEHA DHARAM CHAND
JAIN (MS.), CHENNAI 46. 23 1100 EU0087743 ISHA AGARWAL (MS.),
KOLKATA
20. 13 5463 SU0080782 KRISHNA KUMAR S,
CHENNAI 47. 23 1430 NU0191171 SUMIT BATHWAL, KOLKATA
21. 14 3644 NU0231974 GARIMA GARG (MS.),
JAIPUR 48. 23 5732 SU0078801 YOGITA DEEPAK NAGADA
22. 15 4657 NU0238552 SIDDHARTH JAIN, UDAIPUR (MS.), HYDERABAD
49. 24 1134 EU0088221 SOURABH AGARWALA,
23. 15 5392 SU0063836 A SUNEEL, CHENNAI KOLKATA
24. 16 1335 EU0091479 VIRENDRA SHARMA, 50. 25 1365 EU0092009 PRATIK DROLIA, KOLKATA
KOLKATA 51. 25 2877 NU0237242 SHEFALI GUPTA (MS.),
25. 16 3651 NU0232078 SAMRIDHI KOTHARI (MS.), DELHI
JAIPUR 52. 25 6636 WU0144225 RAHUL SINGHAL, INDORE
26. 17 1421 EU0092895 SMITA SARAOGI (MS.), 53. 25 7133 WU0142056 CHINTAN DIPAK SHAH,
KOLKATA
MUMBAI
STATUS OF TRAINING
(Period from 01-03-2006 to 31-03-2006)
15 Months Training with Company/Company Secretary in Practice and 03 Months & 15 days Practical Training
STAGE-I STAGE-II
Biodata of the students sent to the companies/company Students sponsored for training
secretaries in practice for consideration
APPLICATIONS CASES
Pending Received Forwarded for Pending Pending Received No. of students Pending
Training as on during the consideration as on as on during who have been actually as on
Type 28.02.06 month (upto 31.03.06) 31.03.06 28.02.06 the month taken for training 31.03.06
(upto 31.03.06)
15 Months in 10 47 47 NIL 10 31 35 06
Companies
15 Months with NIL 07 07 NIL NIL 36 28 08
CS in Practice
3 Months in NIL 55 55 NIL
Company/
15 Days in
Optional Area
2. Exemption
1. Number of applications pending as on 28.02.2006 : NIL
2. Number of applications received for exemption : 39
3. Number of exemptions granted : 39
4. Number of pending applications as on 31.03.2006 : NIL
OPPORTUNITY
T o SStart
tart Car eer in
Career
Company Law
with a Fast & Progressive Chartered Accountants Firm involved in Company
Law work from incorporation to mergers and demergers for
CS Students
Apply Immediately with Complete Bio-data for the post of
CORPORATE ASSISTANTS
to
Box No. 130
C/o Student Company Secretary
The Institute of Company Secretaries of India
22, Institutional Area, Lodi Road
New Delhi-110003