Professional Documents
Culture Documents
CHAPTER ONE
INTRODUCTION TO ASSURANCE SERVICES
*Explanation of Reference:
First digit in Study Texts Reference represents chapter number, second and third digits represents
section and sub-section number. Contents in brackets (if any) represent part of the sub-section
which is covered by the learning objective.
2
Auditing Study Notes Chapter 1 Introduction to Assurance Services
Soon after, it was recognized that financial statements prepared by managers/directors presented
best-view of business instead of true-and-fair-view due to some Incentive (e.g. bonus) or
Pressure (e.g. fear of removal) faced by management. Thus credibility of financial statements was
questioned.
Role of auditors was recognized in a great way. Now a days, audits are performed either because:
they are required by law (called statutory audits e.g. all companies in Pakistan are required
by law to get their annual financial statements audited before they are given to
shareholders)
they are not required by law but are voluntarily performed because of value-added benefits
of audits (called non-statutory auditors e.g. sole-proprietorships, partnerships and NGOs
etc. undergoing an audit)
In addition to shareholders, some other stakeholders also get benefits from audit of F/S.
Assurance Engagement:
Assurance engagement means an engagement in which a
practitioner (i.e. assurance provider) obtains evidence about
evaluation of a subject matter against suitable criteria, and expresses
his conclusion to enhance the confidence of the intended users (other
than the responsible party).
Levels/Types of Assurance:
There are three levels/types of assurance i.e.
Absolute Assurance
It is a perfect level of assurance.
CHAPTER ONE
INTRODUCTION TO ASSURANCE SERVICES
QUESTIONS
Q.2 In achieving the objectives of audit, what possible disadvantages can be suffered by the company.
(CA CAF Level Spring 1995)
LO1
Q.3 Briefly describe what you understand by the terms reasonable assurance and limited assurance.
(02 marks)
LO3 (ICAEW Professional Stage March 2006)
Q.4 Distinguish between absolute and reasonable assurance. Identify the type of assurance that is
expected in an audit of the financial statements, clearly outlining the reasons to justify your point of
LO3 view. (08 marks)
(CA CAF Level Spring 2009)
Q.6 List and explain the elements of an assurance engagement. (05 marks)
LO2 (ACCA Foundation Stage June 2010)
Q.7 Describe the level of assurance that the auditor will provide for each of the following
engagements, and how the level of assurance is expressed by the auditor:
LO4 i. Audit engagement
ii. Review engagement
(Malaysian Institute of Accountants September 2010)
Q.9 What is the difference between an assurance engagement and an audit engagement? (02 marks)
(CA CAF Level Spring 2003)
LO4
SUGGESTED SOLUTIONS
Examiners Comments:
It was a basic question that was well answered by the students.
Q.3
Reasonable Assurance:
It is a high but not absolute level of assurance which is expressed in positive form of conclusion e.g.
in our opinion, financial statements give true and fair view.
Limited Assurance:
It is a moderate level of assurance which is expressed in negative form of conclusion e.g. Based on
our review, nothing has come to our attention that causes us to believe that financial statements do
not give a true and fair view.
Examiners Comments:
This question was very well answered overall. Nearly all candidates obtained full marks on this
question.
Exam Tip
Carefully note the requirement of the question. Question requires to describe reasonable
assurance, and not reasonable assurance engagement.
Reasonable assurance is a high but not absolute level of assurance which is expressed in positive
form of conclusion e.g. in our opinion, financial statements give true and fair view.
Examiners Comments:
Seemingly, a significant number of candidates found it to be the easiest question. This question was set
to test the candidates knowledge about the concept of absolute and reasonable assurance and their
relevance in audit, and was based on ISA 200.
Most candidates answered it to a pass standard with an encouraging number obtaining 7 or more
marks.
Exam Tip
This is a poorly drafted question with three sub-parts. As a good practice, whenever a question with
sub-parts is drafted, marks are allocated to each part separately to indicate weightage to be given to
each sub-part. If such a question appears in your exam, you are advised to answer each part
separately and judge yourself weightage to be given.
Examiners Comments:
Performance was inadequate on this question. This question was left unanswered by a significant
minority of candidates. Those who attempted it were often unable to provide more than one relevant
3 By: Muhammad Asif, ACA
Auditing Practice Set Chapter 1 Introduction to Assurance Services
answer. Some candidates seemed to think the question wanted disadvantages of having an audit,
rather than the limitations of an audit, these are two different requirements.
Q.6
Element Explanation (with respect to assurance on financial statements)
1. Intended users (the party which requires subject matter and assurance
i.e. stakeholders)
A three party 2. a responsible party (the party which prepares subject matter i.e.
relationship management) and
3. a practitioner (the party which provides assurance on subject matter i.e.
auditor)
Subject matter is the information which management is required to
A subject matter
prepare i.e. Financial Statements
Criteria means Framework (i.e. rules and regulations) under which
Suitable Criteria financial statements are prepared e.g. GAAP or IFRS.
Suitable means it should be selected appropriately.
Evidence means information on which practitioners conclusion is based.
Evidence
Every conclusion should be backed by sufficient appropriate evidence.
Written It is a page which is written in standard format. It includes conclusion of
Assurance report practitioner, and it is provided by practitioner to intended users.
Examiners Comments:
A large number of candidates did not attempt this question, and where it was attempted it was
inadequately answered. Most candidates who provided an answer clearly did not know what the
elements of an assurance engagement were and therefore proceeded to write down anything they
knew about assurance. The usual answers focused on positive and negative assurance or on the
different types of assurance engagements. Only a small minority of candidates actually understood the
requirement and provided valid answers.
Q.7
Audit engagement Review engagement
Reasonable/High level of Limited/Moderate level of
Level of Assurance
assurance. assurance.
How Level of assurance Positive form of conclusion is Negative form of conclusion is
is expressed expressed in Report. expressed in Report.
Q.9 Assurance engagement means an engagement in which a practitioner (i.e. assurance provider)
obtains evidence about evaluation of a subject matter against suitable criteria, and expresses his
conclusion to enhance the confidence of the intended users (other than the responsible party).
Examiners Comments:
Students confused the question with engagement letter. Even very few students wrote correctly about
the audit engagement.