.

BALAMAND

ia

2007
 ,

,

.


...............................................................................9-17

1. Balamand 1993... 18-

20

2.
Balamand............................................................................................. 21-
24

1.
...25-
37

2. .38-46

3.
.47-50

4. ..51-83

..84-86

CONCLUSION...87-88

..89-100


. . : , 1 (1918)

. :

. . : , 1 (1917)

....: 1 (1924)

..... :

.: ,

.. :

.. : ,

.:

... :

G.O.T.R : Greek Orthodox Theological Review, Brookline, Mass.

E.C.J. : Eastern Churches Journal

S.V.T.Q: Saint Vadimirs Theological Quarterly, Crestwood, New York



1980.

. 1993

7 , 2000

2006

, 1980,

; ,

.
 .

Balamand .

, ,

7 ,

, ,

. ,

Balamand 1993

, .

, .

Balamand.

(...) .

, ,

, ,

27.05.2007

20 ,

. ,

1960,

(1961),

.1

(1962-1965)

1
. . , - , -
1996, . 19. , . . ,


, 2004 ( ,
...) . .

,
( ) , 15(2005) ,
http://users.auth.gr/~martzelo/, Borelli J-Ericsson J., The quest of Unity, SVS Press/USCC,
Crestwood 1996


.2

1964

1054,

1965).3

(1980),

, ,

, .

1979

.4

1979

2
.. . 19.
3
.., . 21 . Mgr Johan Bonny,
,
, . ., , 2005, .196-204
4
... . 40.. ., , . , 1978
(26/5-4/6 1980)

.:5

, ,

1982,

5
. . ,

, 2004
( ...)
146.


1980 1981 Chevetogne

(), .

8 8

1981

.6

(), .

.7

6
. . , - , ,
- 1996,. 45. . -Hoftiher,
, .3 1998.
7
. . ,

 ,

.8

1983 ,

1984

Bari 1986.9 Bari

. 1986,

, 1987 ,

Bari (1986-1987)

) , , ,

1984,

.10

, 2004
( ...)
.153.
8
.. , - , ,
- 1996, . 61-65.
9
... . 81.
10
... . 81.


Bari : ,

. .

.11

, , .

. , ,

.12

- ,

19 27 1988.

11
... . 103. . . (),
, , 1996
12
... 103.


(1982) Bari(1987).13

4 55 .

1.

2.

3. ,

4.

( 1988).14

Hans Joachim Schultz.

. , ,

13
.... 108-130.
14
... . 130-131.
.

.15

Freising (6-

15/ 6 1990)

1990

11-12/12/1990

Ariccia ( 10-15/6/1991)

[( 1990-1991) ( 1991)]

.16

. ()

. ()

15
. .. . 137.
16
. .. . 149-157.
 .

.17

.18

1992 (13-15/3/1992)

, ,

, , ,

17
... . 178.
18
... . 178.


.19

Balamand 1993,

19
... . 204. . ,
, ,
1994,.511-533 .,
, 1981. . ,
., , . .
(1999) (2000)

1. BALAMAND

17 24 1993 Balamand

, , , ,

/, , , ,

, , , .20

.21

20
. Balamand, , 493(1993)
21
. .,
,
( ), , 15 (2005)
 Edwards Idris Cassidy

, ,

, ,

Arricia (1991),

Arricia

.22

, , .

, , ,

, ,

http ://users .auth.gr/ ~martzelo/.. . ,

,
2004 (
...) ., .

; 5
(1993), .61-72. . .,
, ,1996

22
. . ,

, 2004
( ...)
 ,

(),

, , ,

, ,

) ,

().

, ,

Freising,

.23

Balamand

23
, , 24/6/1993 . 10-11 . ,


, 2004 (
...),.213
 2.

BALAMAND

Arricia,

35 ,

.24

. (30/9/1993)

(20/7/1993).

24
. .,
, 20
( ), , 15 (2005)
http ://users .auth.gr/ ~martzelo/ . . Bourgine B., Reception de la decleration de Balamand,
Irenikon 74 (2001), Bouwen F., Balamand 1993 VIIe Session de la commision internationals pour le
dialogue theologique entre l eglise catholique et l eglise orthodoxe, Proche Oriente Cretien 43
(1993),. 91-112
 ,

.25

Freising26 3

.27

.28

(13-14),

.29

25
. Balamand 1 .
26
. .. 2.
27
... 6-11.
28
... 12.
29
... 13.
 .30 ,

.31

.32

.33

34

.35

. ,

28-29

, .

,
30
... 14.
31
... 16.
32
... 19-35.
33
... 21.
34
... 22.
35
... 24.


.36

36
... 35.


1.

37

Balamand.

.38

.39

Freising Arricia,

Balamand 1993 .

37
. ., .

;, 3/1993 . 61-72
38
... ., 61.
39
... ., 62.
 ,

Freising

.40

7 8 .

1724.41

na pntej n sin.

. ,

.42

40
... . 63.
41
... . 64.
42
. Balamand, 12.
 .

. ,

. , .

, ,

.43

, .

. .

, ,

43
... 66.. Spiteris Yannis, La Chiesa Ortodossa Riconosce veramente quella Cattolica
come Chiesa Sorella? Studii Ecumenici, (no1) Venezia, 1996,.43-82
 ,

.44

.45

. ,

, Balamand,

16 ,

.46

, ,

44
... 67.
45
... 67. Balamand 15.
46
... . 68.
 ,

, ,

.47

,,

, ,

.48

.49

Jean Corbon,

Balamand

47
... . 69.
48
... . 69-72.
49
... . 74.
 .

.50

Corbon, ,

, ,

.51

. (6-18)

(19-35).

.52

30,

50
.Corbon Jean, Le Document de Balamand 1993 et son impact oecumenique au Proche-Orient,
Proche Orient Cretien 43(1993) . 113-137.
51
... . 114-115.
52
... . 115.
 Corbon,

. 6-11.53

(1274) (1437-1439).54

. Corbon,

.55

,56

53
... . 116.
54
.: ,
13 . ,
2001 , . , ...
48, , 2002
55
... . 117.
56
... . 117.


. ,

extra ecclesiam nulla salus,

Balamand.57

, Corbon, ,

.58

10 .

Corbon, ,

Fresing

Arricia.59

57
... . 118.
58
... . 119.
59
... . 119-125.
 12-18

.60

, .61

.62

, Corbon,

,, ,

, ,

60
... . 125.
61
.. . 126.
62
... . 127.
 ,

, J.Corbon,

.63

, ,

Hryniewicz,

Lublin ,

,64

Balamand.

. 1991

Byalistok -

, Balamand

12 14.65

63
... . 137.
64
. Hryniewicz W., Labour and Hope. Fifteen years of Catholic-Orthodox Dialogue, SVTQ 39(
1995), .351.
65
... . 345.
 ,

, .

13,

.66 ,

, .

(. 3).

Hryniewicz ,

, .67

Hryniewicz

, .68

, 13

, ,

66
... . 346.
67
... . 345.
68
... . 347.
 ,

, .69

. ,

, ,

.70

. ,

, Hryniewicz,

69
... . 350.
70
... .346-347.


1994 Chenetogne ,

.71

.72

71
... . 351.
72
... .353.
 2.

Lubachivsky

Edwards Idris

Cassidy, 3 1993,

Balamand.73

6, 8,9, 15,16,

16 .74

13 14,

, , .

, ,

73
.Cardinal Lubachivsky to Cardinal Cassidy, E.C.J., 1/1994 no1, . 29-35.
74
... . 29.
. ,

.75

14 15.

, 12

.76

.77

10 11, ,

.
75
... . 30.
76
... . 30.
77
... . 30.
 ,

.78

Serge Keleher,

Logos 1993,

Freising, Arricia Balamand.79

Balamand. , ,

.80

Ariccia,

, ,

, .81

78
... . 31.
79
.Keleher Serge, The Freising, Ariccia and Balamand Statements, An Analysis, Logos 34 (1993)
. 427-463.
80
... 461.
81
... . 462.
 , ,

.82 Keleher

. ,

.83

84 ,

Balamand,

Freising,

,85

Balamand .86

,
82
... . 462.
83
... . 463.
84
.Keleher Serge, Comments on Balamand, E.C.J. 1/1994, no 1, . 36-44.
85
. ., : Freising Balamand,,
2002,.136-137
86
. Keleher Serge, Comments on Balamand, E.C. J.1/1994, no 1 , 38.


.87

, ,

.88

.89

8.7. 1993, , Freising,

Ariccia, Balamand,

1700.

. 90

Keleher

87
... . 38.
88
... . 39.
89
... .43.
90
. Romanian Greek-Catholic Bishops on Balamand, E. C. J. 1/1994 no2 . 49-52.
 ,

, ,

.91

Balamand,

Petras,

Balamand,

:92

1.

2. , ,

3.

91
. Keleher Serge, Comments on the Romanian Greek-Catholic Statement, E. C. J. 1/1994, no2, .
53.
92
.Petras M. David, The Balamand Statement and Hierarchical Reception, E. C. J 1/1994, no 2,
. 69-88.
 4.

5.

Balamand93, ,

Balamand,

, , ,

10

.94

93
.. 71
94
.. 75
.95 ,

Balamand,

, .

. ,

.96

Petras,

.97

, ,

.98

Balamand,

95
.. 76-77
96
. . , - , ,
- 1996, 8.12.1993, ., :
Freising Balamand, , 2002,
., ,
1993,, ,
5(1995) ,. 260-282,
. , ,
16.3.94 J. Romanides, Orthodox and Vatican
Agreement,, .-. 1993. . . 570-580.
97
.Petras M. David, The Balamand Statement and Hierarchical Reception, E. C. J 1/1994, no 2, .
81.
98
. .. . 81 . 84.
.

, ,

. Balamand ,

.99

99
.. . 88.
 3.

...,

, Balamand, 15

1994. 17

.100

...101

Balamand. ,

...,

100
. U.S. Dialogue Commision on Balamand, E. C. J 1/1994, no3, . 12-18.
101
... 1,2,3,4 . 12-13.


Balamand

, .

Bari

; .102

Serge Keleher

.103

, ,

.104

102
... 9, . 15.
103
.Keleher Serge, Comments on the US dialogue Statement, Eastern Churches Journal, 1/1994, no3,
. 19.
104
.U.S. Dialogue Commision on Balamand, E. C. J ,1/1994, no3, . 15. 10.
 ,

.105

Keleher,

.106

, -

.107

...

Balamand

105
. .. 11 . 16.
106
.Keleher Serge, Comments on the US dialogue Statement, E. C. J 1/1994, no3, . 20.
107
.U.S. Dialogue Commision on Balamand, E. C. J 1/1994, no3, .17-18.
 , 19 1993

Balamand.108

, ,

.109

Balamand,

.110

, ,

.111

108
.Response to Balamand from France, Declaration of the Catholic-Orthodox Mixed Commission
of France on Balamand Agreed Statement, E. C. J, 1/1994, no2, . 57-62.
109
... . 58.
110
. .. . 60.
111
... . 60-62.
 4.

Balamand,

, ,

, .

. . ,

Balamand. ,

8.12.1993,

na pntej n sin( .17.21).

.112

, ,

Balamand.113 , ,

. ,

, ,

.114 .

Filioque.

112
. 8.12.1993, 1.,. ,
-,
.54 (-) 2007,.2-7
113
. Balamand, 10.
114
. 8.12.1993, 2-3.
 13 ,

(Filioque, , .).

Filioque

.115

115
... . 4-6.
 ,

. ,

. ,

(/ 1722, / 1727, /

1838, 1848, / 1895).

...

(1952, 1954, 1961). ,

Staniloae.116 ,

116
. . (Staniloae D), , , 1976.


(subsistit in)

.117

, ,

, , ,

.118

Freising Balamand.

Freising.
117
. 1993, 14 17.. .,
, ....., . 24, 1979
., , ......,.,
, 1994,.361-402 .,
Dominus Jesus .
, ... 54, ,
2003
118
. ., : Freising Balamand, . 148-191.
 Balamand .

.119

.120

.121

. ,

.122

119
. Balamand, 16.
120
. Balamand, 21.
121
. Balamand, 13.
122
. Balamand, 13-14.


.123

(Intercommunio), .

, .

. .

.124

123
. Balamand, 14.
124
. ., : Freising Balamand, . 161.
,

.125

13 Balamand,

12 13

. ,

, .

33 ,

125
... . 162.
 .. 126

.,

, ..

127.

Balamand, ,

.128

.129

126
... . 167-170.
127
. .. . 171.
128
. ., , 223-249.
. Groen Bert, The Trojian Horse and the Grecian Gift: Present day Greek Orthodox
Reactions to the Union of Brest Four Hundred years Union of Brest, ed. Bert Groen-Will van den
Bercken, Petters 1998,.201-238
129
... . 229.
 ,

95 .

, 1484

, 1775 .

1775. Balamand,

.130

Balamand. .

(30.11.1994),

/ .131

1.

2. .

3. ,

130
... . 230-231. . ., , 2001,
. Dragas D.G.,The manner of Reception of Roman Catholic Converts into the Orthodox Church,
(Paper presented in the Orthodox/Roman-Catholic Dialogue(USA) in 1998
www.myriobiblos.gr .
131
... . 235-239.
 4.

. Balamand

Lumen Orientale,132

, ,

.133

Ut Unum Sint,134 (25.5.1995),

Edwards Idris Cassidy,

, ,

.135

132
. (), Lumen Orientale
(2.5.1995), 1995(10,11,12)
133
. ., -,, .
240.
134

. ., Ut Unum Sint. ,
. , 1997,.613-621 .,
Ut Unum Sint ,
1995 (14,15,16) .,
Ut Unum Sint (. 17.21)
., . 27 (1995),.331-344
135
. ., , 241
 . ,

, . ,

.136

Balamand.

137,

, .

, ,

136
... . 241-242.
137
. ., ,
1993,, ,
5(1995) ,. 260-282,
. , ,
16.3.94 J. Romanides, Orthodox and Vatican Agreement,,
.-. 1993. . . 570-580.
 ,

.138

, Balamand,

Balamand

. 17

.139

, na sin n

.140

138
.. 263
139
.. . 268.
140
. .. 268-269. . , ,
, ,

(20.09.2004) , , .. (), 2004,
.383-428.
 , .141

. 142

, ,

, .

.143

, ,

Balamand,

141
.. 269-270.
142
.. . 271.
143
... . 273-274.
 .

.144

Balamand

145

.146

Balamand. ,

. , ,

.147

144
. /,
, , . 15.
145
... . 26.
146
... . 28.
147
... . 37.


, ,

--

.,

Balamand.148

.149

Balamand, ,

150.

.151

, ,

148
. ., . .
, ... 46, , 2001, . 193-197.
149
.. . 194.
150
.. . 194.
151
.. . 195.
 .

.152

, ,

, ,

.153

Balamand , ,

Freising

152
.. . 195.
153
.. . 197.
 ,

, ,

, ,

Balamand,

.154

Santiago de Compostela,

154
. .,
, 21,
( ), , 15 (2005)
http ://users .auth.gr/ ~martzelo/


.155

Balamand ,

1995 ,

.156

, ,

1995,

Balamand

Ut Unum Sint, Balamand

Freising, .157

Vsevolod () of

Scopelos

, Greek Orthodox Theological

155
... . 12, nterview mit Erzbischof Stylianos zum stand des Dialogs, Okumenisches
forum 16(1993) . 118.
156
. .,
, 22,
( ), , 15 (2005)
http ://users .auth.gr/ ~martzelo/
157
... . 22.
Review,

.158

.159

, ,

, ,

, , .160

Balamand,

, .

.161

13 14

Balamand .

158
.Bishop Vsevolod of Scopelos, Reflections on Balamand, GOTR 42 (1997), . 221-243.
159
.Bishop Vsevolod of Scopelos, Reflections on Balamand, GOTR 42 (1997), . 221-223.
160
... . 222.
161
.. . 223.
 .162

. ,

.163

...

.164

162
.. . 224.
163
.. . 224.
164
... . 225. Balamand 3.
 .

.165

,166

, , 20 ,

, .

. ,

Filioque

165
.. 226.
166
.. 230-231.


.167

Ericson, ,

Balamand. ,

, ,

.168

Freising Arricia

Balamand, .

, ,

, ,

, ,,

.169

22-32. ,

167
... . 238-239.
168
Ericson John, Concerning the Balamand Statement, GOTR 42(1997), . 25-43.
169
. .. 30.
 .

, , Ericson

.170

.171 ,

Ericson,

. Ericson

.172

.173 ,

, ,

170
. .. . 33.
171
. .. . 33-36.
172
... . 37.
173
... . 37.
 Balamand,

.174 ,

, .

6-11,

. 10,

( ) -

, Ericson,

(Extra Ecclesiam nulla sallus).175

174
... . 38.
175
... . 40.
 13,

, .

, ,

. Ericson,

.176

1993

Balamand

176
.. . 42. .Dragas G., The manner of Reception of Roman Catholic Converts into the
Orthodox Church, Paper Presented at the Orthodox/Roman Catholic Dialogue (USA) in 1998
www.myriobiblos.gr .
.177

.178

; .179

, .

, .180

177
., . , : ;
1993 . 35-37.
178
... . 36.
179
... 36.
180
.. . 36.
 .

, , ,

.181 ,

. ,

.182

.183

181
. .. . 36.
182
.. 37.
183
.. 36.


, .184

(Lewis

Patsavos), Eastern Churches Journal,

1994,

Balamand

.185

, .186

. ,

, ,

.187

, ,

( )

184
... 37.
185
.Patsavos L., An Orthodox response to Balamand, E. C. J., 1/1994, 3, . 22-29.
186
.. . 22.
187
... . 22.
 ,

.188

, ),

.189

, ,

17.21

Balamand

190

188
.. . 23.
189
.. . 23.
190
... . 24. :. , :
Freising Balamand, . , :
, , 1993,
5 ,1995,.260-282
 10 ,

, ,

. ,

- .191

. ,

, ,

(filioque, , ,

);192

. ,

191
. Patsavos L., An Orthodox response to Balamand,E.C. J. , 1/1994 ,3 .25.
192
... 25 ,
.Spiteris Yannis, La Chiesa Ortodossa Riconosce veramente quella cattolica come Chiesa Sorella?,
Studi Ecumenici, Venezia 1996(no1).43-82 ,
, .1-15(1993).


Balamand,, ,

.193

Una Sancta ,

.194

, 8 1994,

Balamand.195

193
... . 26-27.
194
. .. . 29.
195
. .,
1990-1993 , , 1997 , . 146-151.


.196

Freising,

, Balamand,

. ,

Freising.197

..., 3 16,

.198

...

.199

196
... . 146.
197
. .. . 147.
198
. .. . 148.
199
... . 149.
 ,

.200

Balamand,

. ,

...,

.201

.202

.203

200
... 149.
201
... 150.
202
... . 151.
203
... . 151.


Balamand,

,
 .

Balamand,

1. , Balamand,

, .

2. , Balamand,

3. Balamand

(. , ,

Ericson, ..). ,

Balamand ,

(. ., .,

, Patsavos).

4. Balamand

, .

, Balamand,
 , ,

CONCLUSION

Penetrating with a fast glance the reactions of the text of Balamand, we

see again why the Orthodox Church stopped the dialogue for a seven-
 year period. However, except the Orthodox Church, the Roman-
Catholics and the Uniates accepted the agreement of Balamand, and
underlined the positive repercussions of text. The conclusions that
follow lead us to enlight the opinions of the involved parts of the
dialogue.

1. For the Roman-Catholics, the text of Balamand, completes the

agreements in the previous texts, and imports the Uniates in the dialogue
as equal as the other two. In other words, the dialogue from bilateral
becomes tripartite. They condemn the Uniatism as a way and method of
proselytism but they give the right to the Uniates to exist and to act
because of the communion with Rome.
2. According to the Uniates, the text of Balamand is judged
absolutely positive. It is the chance the Uniates could have to be
recognized as official part in the dialogue and as an ecclesiastical
formation that draws his existence from the communion with Rome.
There are also some reactions from fountamentalists Uniates that they do
not accept the forgiveness and the communication with the Orthodox
Church.
3.From the Orthodox side we do not have only one opinion. A lot
of Orthodox theologians accept that this text is "the best that could be
written that moment", and they are advocates of the acceptance of the
Uniates in the theological dialogue as a way to solve the existing problem
(cf. Matsoukas, Efesoy Hrysostomos, Ericson, ect.). On the other hand,
there are theologians who claim that the text of Balamand degrades the
Orthodox theology, blunts the differences with the Roman-Catholics,
betrays the Orthodoxy and of course vindicates the existence of the
Uniates instead of condemning them. (cf. Father Zisis, Father Romanides,
The Holy Community of Mount Athos, prof. Patsavos ect).
 4. According to my opinion, the agreement of Balamand was a
false move of Orthodox delegation. Because of the absence of many
Orthodox churches from the Mixed Committee, it was the best occasion
to sign an unfriendly agreement for the Orthodoxy. The acceptance of
theory of the"Sister Churches " is judged unacceptable because only the
Orthodox churches have the right to call each other "sisters".
Simultaneously, if we recognize the Roman-Catholic church as a "Sister
church", we recognize also the Uniates as Brothers and their Church as
Sister, so the rejection of Uniatism remains only verbal. The deviation of
Orthodox delegation from the Orthodox ecclesiology and Soteriology and
the acceptance of the Branch Theory, are the most highlighted in the
text. For these theological errors, that are simultaneously pointed out also
by Orthodox theologians, the text of Balamand, at our opinion, is
temporally unacceptable, because the problem of Uniatism remains
unsolved. We propose therefore, the condemnation of text and the re-
approach of the subject in that manner that we can continue the Bilateral
Theological Dialogue.