Professional Documents
Culture Documents
COA
BSP contends that it is not a government-owned or Pimentel v. Aguirre
controlled corporation Section 1 of AO 372, insofar as it "directs" LGUs to
Not all corporations, which are not government reduce their expenditures by 25% is valid
owned or controlled, are considered private Yes. As it is advisory only.
corporations LGUs have the power to allocate resources in
There exists another distinct class of corporations or accordance with their own priorities
chartered institutions which are otherwise known as
public corporations. Ganzon v. CA
Mayor Ganzon was suspended
Limbona v. Mangelin He contends that the President cannot do that
Decentralization of Admin the national government because of local autonomy and the present
does not lose supervision and control over the LGU Constitution only gives supervisory powers to the
Decentralization of Power The local government President
enjoys limited autonomy from the national Supervision includes disciplinary action
government, thus, minimum intervention from the Supervision means overseeing or the power or
latter authority of an officer to see that subordinate officers
perform their duties.
Basco v. PAGCOR Control, on the other hand, means the power of an
Doctrine of Imperium in Imperio - a government, officer to alter or modify or nullify of set aside what a
power, or sovereignty within a government, power, or subordinate officer had done in the performance of
sovereignty his duties and to substitute the judgment of the
Doesnt have an inherent power to tax former for that of the latter.
PAGCORs charter does not violate Local Autonomy
Doctrine of Supremacy of the National Government San Juan v. CSC
over LGUs San Juans Provincial Budget Officer was vacant
Gov. appointed a person
Lina v. Pano DBM recommends another person
PCSO The DBM may appoint only from the list of qualified
Business permit was denied by Mayor recommendees nominated by the Governor.
PCSOs terminal is valid If none is qualified, he must return the list of
This does not mean that local governments may nominees to the Governor
actually enact ordinances that go against laws duly Concept of Local Autonomy
enacted by Congress Supervision over Control
Power of LGU to legislate and enact ordinances is
merely a delegated power coming from Congress. LLDA (Laguna Lake) v. CA
LLDA was granted exclusive Jurisdiction through a
Cordillera Board v. COA RA
Preparation to be Autonomous Then came 7160
EO 220 is valid The charter of the LLDA embodies a valid exercise of
It does not create an autonomous region police power for the purpose of protecting and
It just merely provides for the transition measures in developing the Laguna Lake region, as opposed to the
the enactment of an organic act Local Government Code, which grants powers to
municipalities to issue fishing permits for revenue
MMDA v. Bel Air purposes.
MMDA has no power to enact ordinances for the
welfare of the community. GenSan v. COA
It is the LGUs, acting through their respective Early Retirement Program
legislative councils that possess legislative power and Invalid Early benefits from GSIS and PAG-IBIG
police power
MMDA is a public corporation though Prov. Of Negros Occidental
Excess in the payments of Premiums
Demaala v. COA Valid
Ordinance Additional 5% levy on real property tax Fiscal Autonomy
COA questioned the said Ordinance ISSUE: It does not require approval from the
Setting the rate of the additional levy for the special President
education fund at less than 1% is within the taxing
power of local government units. Villafuerte v. Robredo
It is consistent with the guiding constitutional 20% was not allocated
principle of local autonomy. DILG reiterating that 20% component of the IRA shall
be utilized for desirable social, economic and
Mandamus v. Romulo environmental outcomes
Estrada required the submission of a proposal before Issuances were issued pursuant to the policy of
the release of the shares of LGUs promoting good governance through transparency,
Art 10 Sec 7 states that there is no required proposal accountability and participation. The action of the
The just share is automatically given
respondent is certainly within the constitutional Comp. City 100 150,000 100M(RA9009
bounds of his power as alter ego of the President. )
Municipality 50 25,000 2.5M
League of Provinces v. DENR Barangay Province 2000
FTAA Barangay M. Mnla 5000
Power to control/regulate small scale mines
Exceptions:
Valid
Congress passed an exception creating the specific LGU
Navarro v. Ermita
Contiguous Requirement