Professional Documents
Culture Documents
1
ENI S.p.A. DEPARTMENT ACTIVITY' DEPT. TYPE SECTION N.
TITLE
OVERPRESSURE EVALUATION MANUAL
DISTRIBUTION LIST
NOTE: The present document is available in Eni Agip Intranet (http://wwwarpo.in.agip.it) and a
CD-Rom version can also be distributed (requests will be addressed to STAP Dept. in
Eni - Agip Division Headquarter)
f
e
d
c
b Issued by P. Magarini C. Lanzetta A. Galletta
28/06/99 28/06/99 28/06/99
The present document is CONFIDENTIAL and it is property of AGIP It shall not be shown to third parties nor shall it be used for
reasons different from those owing to which it was given
ARPO IDENTIFICATION CODE PAGE 2 OF 299
ENI S.p.A.
Agip Division REVISION
STAP-P-1-M-6130 0
INDEX
1. INTRODUCTION 4
1.1. PURPOSE OF THE DOCUMENT 4
1.2. IMPLEMENTATION 4
1.3. UPDATING, AMENDMENT, CONTROL & DEROGATION 6
2. ORIGIN OF OVERPRESSURES 7
2.1. DEFINITIONS 7
2.1.1. Rock Medium 7
2.1.2. Effective Tension Principle 7
2.1.3. Overburden Gradient 9
2.1.4. Pore Pressure Gradient 11
2.1.5. Fracture Gradient 12
2.2. ORIGINS OF OVERPRESSURES 12
2.2.1. Rate of Sedimentation 14
2.2.2. Diagenesis 26
2.2.3. Osmotic Phenomenon 41
2.2.4. Tectonics 43
2.2.5. Artesian Pressures 46
2.2.6. Reservoir Geometry 46
2.2.7. Re-Pressurisation Of A Reservoir 46
2.3. SUB-PRESSURES AND THEIR ORIGIN 46
2.3.1. Sub-Pressures Due To Prolonged Well Production 46
2.3.2. Anomalous Drop Of The Ground Water Table 49
2.3.3. Sub-pressures Caused By Tectonic Phenomena 49
3. SEISMIC METHODS 51
3.1. TYPES OF SEISMIC WAVES 51
3.1.1. Longitudinal And Transverse Elastic Waves 52
3.1.2. Rayleigh Waves 53
3.1.3. Love Waves 53
3.1.4. Seismic Noise 54
3.2. PROPAGATION OF SEISMIC WAVES 57
3.2.1. Factors Affecting The Propagation Of Seismic Waves 57
3.2.2. Propagation Of Seismic Waves: Reflection And Transmission (Refraction) 59
3.3. SEISMIC REFLECTION METHOD 63
3.3.1. Fundamental Principles 63
3.3.2. Evaluation Of Reflection Velocity 69
3.4. SEISMIC DATA PROCESSING 80
3.4.1. Seismograms 80
3.4.2. Steps In Seismic Data Processing And Correction 84
3.5. LAND AND MARINE SEISMIC SURVEYS 104
3.5.1. Land Seismic Surveys 104
3.5.2. Marine Seismic Surveys 112
ARPO IDENTIFICATION CODE PAGE 3 OF 299
ENI S.p.A.
Agip Division REVISION
STAP-P-1-M-6130 0
1. INTRODUCTION
1.2. IMPLEMENTATION
The purpose of this treatise is to provide a homogeneous and above all critical revision of
the theories on the origins of overpressures and of the methods for the determination and
calculation of overburden, pore pressure, fracture gradient and to analyse their impact on
drilling operations.
Though the literature on the topic is vast, it has, nonetheless, never been brought together
systematically and in particular, the practical angles of prediction and interpretation of
overpressures have not been adequately developed. This work seeks to fill that gap by
extending, in detail, the interpretation and calculation stages with examples, diagrams and
working recommendations. This is done in such a way as to benefit not only those who deal
with these topics, such as students, but also those who are directly involved, both in Drilling
and Production Engineering Departments and out in the field.
Knowledge of pressure gradients is of primary importance in planning and operating an oil
well, furnishing all the indispensable information necessary in order to logically plan drilling
and production activities.
In fact, if the pressure gradients are known, the following can be determined:
Optimum casing string depths.
Grade and thickness of the casing required to resist expected stress.
Density and optimum rheological characteristics of the drilling mud and
cementing slurry.
Capacity of the drilling rig, which is linked to the dimensions (length and
diameter) and weight of the casing strings.
Preparation, and optimisation of the hydraulic programme (pump choice, surface
equipment, bit characteristics, etc.).
Choice of safety equipment, such as BOPs (blow-out preventers), choke
manifold, and surface equipment in general.
Choice of wellhead.
Choice of Drilling Control Unit.
ARPO IDENTIFICATION CODE PAGE 5 OF 299
ENI S.p.A.
Agip Division REVISION
STAP-P-1-M-6130 0
The treatise opens with a brief summary (Section 2) of various theories relating to the
theme of overpressure origins or, in a more general sense, of abnormal pressure origins.
From a practical point of view, it certainly is not easy to establish the reason for the
existence of abnormal pressure gradient formations, since very often their origins lie in a
combination of various causes.
Of practical interest, however, is their determination and location, although defining the
causes themselves may facilitate the subsequent interpretative phase.
The determination of pressure gradients can take place in successive phases: the first
phase, essential in draughting the drilling programme, is based for the most part on
analyses and processing of seismic data and on data taken from possible reference wells. It
is obvious that if the drilling is explorative and is being done for the first time in a certain
area, the seismic data may be the sole source of information available. For this reason, the
methods based on seismic data analyses are dealt with, in detail, in section 3 of this
treatise. The section begins with an exhaustive treatment of the theory and the how-to of
seismic surveying, both onshore and offshore. Its principal purpose is to clarify the
assumptions, the working hypotheses, and the interpretative difficulties that the
geophysicist comes up against. This acquaints the drilling and production technician with
the degree of reliability that should be ascribed to the data he works with, and on which he
then bases his operating programme.
In section 4, the methods for recording and processing drilling parameters are reviewed; this
stage is set-up and carried out in the field itself, and is invaluable in checking predictions
and adjusting of operative decisions, made on the basis of the seismic analysis,
accordingly. In fact, the drilling programme must be regarded as a guide to operations and,
indeed, should not be taken by the letter; the indications it gives are not binding, but are to
be subjected to continuous verification and checking during the actual drilling. Should new
situations emerge, differing from those expected, the programme must be changed in time
and adapted to the new well conditions. It is, therefore, easy to understand the importance
of these surveys. A recent step forward in this field are sensors and recorders installed on
site that provide continuous and automatic measurement, recording and precise storage of
the most important parameters and the adoption of calculating systems which allow their
continuous, automatic and real time processing. It goes without saying that where an
interpretative process is necessary, the role performed by the technician is crucial in
obtaining reliable and meaningful results.
Should the predictions made from the seismic survey, and the results obtained processing
the drilling parameters be incongruent, it is logical to assign greater credibility to the latter.
This is because they relate to the well being drilled and, taken as a whole, more clearly
reflect the actual condition of the formations met in drilling.
ARPO IDENTIFICATION CODE PAGE 6 OF 299
ENI S.p.A.
Agip Division REVISION
STAP-P-1-M-6130 0
2. ORIGIN OF OVERPRESSURES
2.1. DEFINITIONS
2.1.1. Rock Medium
A rock, either loose or indurate, is a poliphase medium, consisting of a solid phase, a liquid
phase and/or a gas phase.
The solid phase makes up part of the rock volume and consists of solid matter whose
mineralogical composition, shape and size may differ from one rock to another depending
on its geological history.
The liquid and/or gas phase is contained in the empty spaces within the rock, that is in the
spaces between the grains in unconsolidated loose rock and between fissure walls in
indurated rock.
The rock characteristic of containing a certain number of more or less interconnected empty
spaces, called pores, is defined as Total Porosity. It may vary according to the number,
size, shape and space distribution of pores within the rock. Their nature may be:
Primary: when pores were formed at the same time as the rock.
Secondary: when pores were formed after the formation of the rock, as a result
of lithogenics.
Not all of the pores within a rock medium permit gravitational water (i.e. water subject to
gravity, as opposed to absorbed or capillary water) to flow underground freely under
hydrostatic pressure. Fluid flow may be established only through interconnected pores
(Effective Porosity). Within the natural environment, rock media with equivalent total
porosities but having different effective porosities are frequently met with; because of such
different effective porosities, the resistance to fluid flow within the rocks may vary. Any
increase in the resistance to fluid flow through a rock medium may, as it will be better
shown later, give rise to abnormal pressure gradients, thus favouring the build up of
overpressured zones.
Assuming:
N = Component perpendicular to the dividing surface of the resultant of the
forces acting through A
n
n
i=1
1
i = Perpendicular component of the grain interactions through their contact
t
i=1
1
i = Components of the forces acting among the grains
T Eq. 2.5
=
A
we obtain:
n Eq. 2.6
N n 1
i
Pp x ap + Pg x a g
Pov = = i=1
+
A A A
n Eq. 2.7
T t 1
i
= = i=1
A A
Effective Pressure is defined as:
n Eq. 2.8
n 1
i
Pc = i=1
A
ARPO IDENTIFICATION CODE PAGE 9 OF 299
ENI S.p.A.
Agip Division REVISION
STAP-P-1-M-6130 0
which stands for the forces transmitted within a granular mass through the solid grains.
Where the gas volume is smaller than the water volume, in which case water saturation of
the rock medium is about 100% (Sw = l), the Eq. (1.6.) becomes:
a Eq. 2.9
Pov = Pc + Pp x ( 1 )
A
since:
ag 0
and thus:
a g x p g 0 and a p = A a
Because of the very small contact area between grains (i.e. a/A<<< 1), it follows that:
Pov = Pc + Pp Eq. 2.10
This equation gives the distribution between the liquid and the solid phase of the forces
applied to a granular mass. From the last equation it may be noted that one part of the total
pressure exerted is borne by the interstitial fluids and the other by the solid skeleton.
The total vertical pressure Pov, acting on a point at a depth H from the ground surface, is
easily obtained from the equilibrium conditions of the prismatic element above an area A
through the point being considered, having weight G. Thus we have:
G = Pov x A Eq. 2.11
With a constant unit volume weight b :
G = b x H x A Eq. 2.12
we obtain:
Pov = b x H Eq. 2.13
In general, if b is expressed in g/cc and H in m:
Pov = b x H / 10
where b is constant:
1 H
10 O
Pov = b dH with b with varying at each point
The overburden gradient Gov is the pressure increment for a unit increment of depth. It
gives the average apparent or bulk density at a given depth.
In general it will be, with Gov expressed in g/cc:
Eq. 2.15
Pov x 10
Gov = = b where is constant
H b
10
Gov
H1 + H2 + n
with b,i constant for each layer of thickness, Hi :
H
Gov =
1 o
b dH
where b varies at each point
H
10
O
dH
ARPO IDENTIFICATION CODE PAGE 11 OF 299
ENI S.p.A.
Agip Division REVISION
STAP-P-1-M-6130 0
With the above equations it is easy to calculate the overburden pressure at each
subsurface point, once the densities of the layers encountered are known.
In general, the formation of a pressure barrier depends on many factors, among them:
Phenomena, sometimes complex, which deform clay minerals under a physical
load (e.g., weight of sediments).
Clays as semi-permeable membranes.
Type and quantity of clay minerals present in the rock.
-4 -6
Very low permeability clays (10 10 millidarcies).
Non-Newtonian behaviour of water trapped in clay interstices.
Interaction between rock, gases and organic acids.
Type, concentration and diffusivity of cautions.
When added to the effect of geological time, all of these factors or a combination of them
may change the physico-chemical environment and produce slow lithological changes
within these covering rocks which may then become pressure and permeability barriers.
As it has already been pointed out, various and often many overimposed factors may create
abnormal pressures. Subsurface phenomena have their source in geological, physical,
geochemical and mechanical processes. It is often very difficult, if not impossible, to identify
the effect and to evaluate the importance of each factor because of the simultaneous
occurrence of several of these phenomena.
The most common conditions and causes of the build-up of overpressures will be examined
in the following pages.
ARPO IDENTIFICATION CODE PAGE 14 OF 299
ENI S.p.A.
Agip Division REVISION
STAP-P-1-M-6130 0
These parameters, in various combinations, bring about different pressure distributions and
a different density profile for clay formations.
At any rate, of the three zones into which the clay pressure curve is divided (hydrostatic,
transition and high pressure, Refer to Figure 2.1), the transition zone is the one most
affected by these parameters.
The Compaction Theory, which has proved to be valid for calculating the pressure curve in
many experimental cases, will be used later on to emphasise the effects of various
geological parameters.
ARPO IDENTIFICATION CODE PAGE 15 OF 299
ENI S.p.A.
Agip Division REVISION
STAP-P-1-M-6130 0
In the first case, the interstitial pressures induced within the rock medium cannot balance
the external hydraulic conditions; furthermore, since the amount of water within the porous
medium is unchanged, and assuming the medium to be saturated and the water and
granules making up the solid skeleton to be incompressible, un-drained conditions
correspond necessarily to incompressibility of the medium.
In the second case, interstitial pressures are in, or tend to reach, a state of equilibrium with
the external hydraulic conditions. Any variation in the volume of the porous medium
corresponds, under the assumptions made above, to a variation in the amount of water.
V m Eq. 2.21
I
= I
V k
where:
kI =
(
3 1 2 I ) Eq. 2.22
EI
Im =
1 I
3
(
x + Iy + Iz ) Eq. 2.23
ARPO IDENTIFICATION CODE PAGE 17 OF 299
ENI S.p.A.
Agip Division REVISION
STAP-P-1-M-6130 0
with:
I
k = Modulus of volume compressibility of the solid skeleton
I
= Poissons modulus for the solid skeleton
I
E = Youngs modulus
I
m = Average effective stress
Under the assumption made in the previous paragraph and also assuming a negligible
compressibility for the grains, a volume change V of the rock medium can only be caused
by a change in the volume of the pores.
For un-drained conditions, interstitial fluid volume is constant and therefore is:
V = 0 Eq. 2.24
or
1 Eq. 2.25
V I
Im = 0
k
Therefore:
Im = 0 Eq. 2.26
According to the effective stress principle:
Im = m Pp Eq. 2.27
where:
m = Total average stress
giving:
m = Pp Eq. 2.28
ARPO IDENTIFICATION CODE PAGE 18 OF 299
ENI S.p.A.
Agip Division REVISION
STAP-P-1-M-6130 0
When the distribution of the induced stress is radically symmetrical, one may state
(assuming linear elasticity, isotropy and homogeneity):
m =
1
(Pov + 2 Pr ) = Pp Eq. 2.29
3
where:
Pov = Total vertical stress
Pr = Total horizontal stress
r =
1
[ Pr 0.5(Pov + Pr )] = 0 Eq. 2.30
E
from which:
Pr = Pov Eq. 2.31
and, by substituting Eq. 2.31 into Eq. 2.29:
Pov = Pp Eq. 2.32
Any load increment produces an interstitial pressure change when un-drained conditions
are maintained.
Compaction Theory
If a rock medium is subjected to external stresses and boundary conditions of
impermeability are removed, drainage conditions are established. Water is free to move
within the intergranular spaces and unsteady filtration movement sets in.
The pressures, induced under Un-drained conditions and not balanced by boundary
conditions due to the present of formations, establish a hydraulic gradient and, thus, a
hydrostatic gradient (filtration movement), which changes over time and with the steady
lessening of over-pressures.
If the total applied stress remains constant, interstitial pressure changes correspond to
effective stress variations, with subsequent deformation of the rock medium. This process
of overpressure dissipation is called compaction.
ARPO IDENTIFICATION CODE PAGE 19 OF 299
ENI S.p.A.
Agip Division REVISION
STAP-P-1-M-6130 0
As far as the natural characteristics of the medium are concerned, this process is controlled
by the viscous resistance between water and solid skeleton and by its compressibility. With
the introduction of viscosity and an unsteady state, time enters as a variable in the
description of this phenomenon; in other words, compaction takes place during an interval
of time dependent upon the permeability coefficient and the deformability of the solid
skeleton.
The rheologic model which best fits this phenomenon is represented by coupling elastic and
viscous elements in parallel (Kelvins body) (Refer to Figure 2.2.). The rock medium is
represented by the combination of water and springs within the cylinder; the hydrodynamic
filtration resistance is represented by the friction loss due to the flow of water through the
orifices.
The closing of the orifices corresponds to an un-drained condition, while their opening
represents a drained condition.
When studying compaction, interstitial pressure distribution and variations with time may be
deduced from the Continuity Law by equating the volume of liquid flowing through the
boundary surface per unit of time to the corresponding change in the volume of the rock
medium and from Darcys law (relating to the flow of fluids).
The general equation for compaction is given by:
1 2 P P + k P = 1 x e
2 2 Eq. 2.33
k x + k
fl X 2 y 2 z 2 1 + e 0 t
y z
where:
By limiting the analysis to uni-directional flow and deformation (in the vertical direction) and
using the following assumptions:
Total saturation (Sw = 1)
Slight deformation as compared to the thickness of the medium
Linear elasticity for the solid skeleton
Sudden and continuous application of external stress
Homogeneity and isotropy of the medium.
ARPO IDENTIFICATION CODE PAGE 20 OF 299
ENI S.p.A.
Agip Division REVISION
STAP-P-1-M-6130 0
k z x E ed 2 P P Eq. 2.34
x =
fl z 2 t
where:
k z x E ed
= Compaction coefficient
fl
Eed = Compressibility modulus (derived from the compressibility curve for
clays)
fl = Fluid density (water)
kz = Vertical permeability coefficient
Assuming a time-dependent external stress rather than one constant over time, the
following equation holds:
For each of the stages just mentioned, the sequence of clay sediments is bordered
underneath by an impermeable substratum so that the greatest distant covered by the
water particle to get to the draining surface is equal to the thickness of the clay sediments.
In order to emphasise the role played by the geological factors and, most of all, the
deposition rate, the dissipation of overpressures between successive stages of compaction
has not been considered.
1) Calculations require the values for kz, S = fl / E ed and the dimensions of the
formation being investigated and its deposition rate.
ARPO IDENTIFICATION CODE PAGE 22 OF 299
ENI S.p.A.
Agip Division REVISION
STAP-P-1-M-6130 0
The value of these parameters may change; they can, however, be included within the
single parameter Q, in order to facilitate the comparison between clays with different
hydraulic properties, thickness and sedimentation rate. The overall parameter Q may be
defined as:
fl I Eq. 2.36
Q= x sh x
E ed k
where:
k = Rock permeability
Eed = Compressibility modulus
sh = Deposition rate
l = Sediment thickness.
Through application of the Compaction Theory, the density and pressure profiles for this
stage have been obtained and are shown in Figure 2.3. An examination of the curves
produces the following conclusions:
In the transition zone, pore pressures are only marginally sensitive to the values
of Q.
In the high-pressure region (i.e. the deepest zone), changes in the values of Q
are apparent in the range 0 to 20; for values of Q above this range, pressure
and density values are quite constant.
3) In the case of burial below a great thickness of permeable sediments, the situation is
almost identical to that seen in Point 2, but with clearly greater pore pressure values
(Refer to Figure 2.5)
ARPO IDENTIFICATION CODE PAGE 23 OF 299
ENI S.p.A.
Agip Division REVISION
STAP-P-1-M-6130 0
2.2.2. Diagenesis
Overpressures may develop as a consequence of diagnoses; i.e. of the post-depositional
alteration process of sediments and of component minerals. Diagenetic processes include
the formation of new minerals, re-distribution and re-crystallisation of substances present in
the sediments, and lithification.
The most important and frequent processes in the development of abnormal pressure
zones are the following:
Diagenesis of clays
Diagenesis of volcanic ash
Diagenesis of sulphates
Secondary precipitation of cementation material
Decomposition of organic matter.
Clay Diagenesis
Introduction
Studies started in 1950 in several sedimentary basins with the support of laboratory
experiments have by now proved that during diagnosis, under the effects of pressure,
temperature and ion activity, clays of montmorillonite composition change to clays of illite
composition, passing through an intermediate phase, which is of maximum importance
when explaining overpressures and migration of subsurface organic fluids.
Montmorillonite is a clay mineral generally found at minor depth and which reaches a
hydrostatic equilibrium relatively quickly, losing excess water easily. When this clay, due to
subsidence, is found at depths of between 2,000 and 4,000 m, desorption of the liquids
(crystallisation water) between the elemental placelets takes place and, therefore, a further
loss of liquid occurs.
Temperature plays a very important role at this stage: in fact, as the temperature increases
with depth, crystallisation water is changed to mobile interstitial water. Due to the fact that
the mobilisation rate of the crystallisation water is higher than the expulsion rate, an
overpressure develops within the clay. Such clay, which is at this point no longer
montmorillonite but Montmorillonite-Illite in composition, remains overpressured until all the
excess liquid is able to flow out, which coincides with the complete transformation to illite
clay; this occurs when clays are found at considerable depth.
Under these temperature and pressure conditions, Illite clays will be at a normal gradient.
Several authors, such as Powers, Burst, Magara, have dealt with the questions of why and
how the physical-chemical process of montmorillonite dehydration takes place, by trying to
correlate the conditions found in different sedimentary basins; however, not all of them are
in agreement in considering diagnosis the principal cause of overpressure development.
Before looking at the question in greater detail, a brief description of the most important
clays is given in the following section.
ARPO IDENTIFICATION CODE PAGE 27 OF 299
ENI S.p.A.
Agip Division REVISION
STAP-P-1-M-6130 0
The Illite general formula is Ky Al4 (Si8 AIy) O20 (OH)4 where y value may vary between 1.0
and 1.5. Iliite contains very small amounts of water; other features include the total absence
of organic liquids and a low ion exchange due to the presence of potassium and sodium
ions.
To sum up, the Smectite group prototype mineral is Pyrophyllite, while the IlIite group
prototype is Muscovite.
Figure 2.9 - Relationship Between Water Vapour Pressure, Water Content And Distance
Between Unit Layers Of Montmorillomnite
ARPO IDENTIFICATION CODE PAGE 33 OF 299
ENI S.p.A.
Agip Division REVISION
STAP-P-1-M-6130 0
If the Montmorillonite is deposited in a delta or marine environment and the overburden has
reached the thickness of several hundred metres, an equilibrium is established between the
water contained in the clay pores and the water absorbed by the Montmorillonite particles. A
further increase in pressure resulting from burial is insufficient to displace the water
remaining trapped in the pores. At depths greater than 500-1,000 metres, much of the water
present is hydration water distributed in the four monomolecular layers between the
elemental placelets (Figure 2.12A).
As the Montmorillonite is changed into Illite, the water present between the placelets is
expelled and becomes free water (Figure 2.12). In this way there is an increase in water
transferred as a result of dehydration. Thus, an increase in porosity and permeability is
obtained.
At the pressures existing between 2,000-3,000 m, the water molecules are located too far
from the particle surface to be held by the double electric layer force. In this way, the water
is expelled from the pores and a complete transformation into Illite occurs (Figure 2.12). The
relationship between the expelled water and the burial depth is shown in Figure 2.13; these
curves permit the determination of porosity, permeability and formation density values.
The latest hypothesis proposed by Powers, and confirmed by laboratory analysis predicts a
3
density of 1.4g/cm for the water between the Montmorillonite packages.
In the process of diagenesis, the change of crystallisation water into interstitial water, with a
3
density of 1 g/cm , creates a variation in volume of about 40%. This represents the volume
between the particles necessary to accommodate the desorbed water in the process of
diagenesis in order to maintain a hydrostatic gradient. This value is hypothetical, since
Montmorillonitic clays made up solely of Montmorillonite do not exist in nature, because
usually other minerals are present. The real value of volume variation lies between 2.5%
and 20%, at least for clays of the Gulf Coast, U.S.A. Such a mechanism, according to
Powers, could explain the creation of overpressures.
ARPO IDENTIFICATION CODE PAGE 35 OF 299
ENI S.p.A.
Agip Division REVISION
STAP-P-1-M-6130 0
The compressibility of water at the depths considered and at the temperature reached is
practically zero. Therefore, any quantity of water introduced, no matter how small, definitely
creates some overpressure, since it cannot be compressed. The problem can be compared
to trying to add liquid to an already full container. In conclusion, the Powers theory can be
summarised by granting the existence of two stages of dehydration (Figure 2.13):
a) The first due to-compaction;
b) The second due to diagenesis.
According to Burst, on the other hand, the process of dehydration develops in three stages,
as indicated in Figure 2.14. In the first stage, the pore water, or the excess water present in
the elemental placelets, is expelled by the increase in pressure due to burial. The water
content in clay sediments, in this initial phase, reaches 70-80%. Following the dehydration
caused by compac-tion, the water content is reduced to about 30% (20-25% becomes water
held in the elemental placelets and 5-10% water held in the pores).
In the second stage, the pressure, with respect to the temperature, is ineffective as a
dehydrating agent. To better explain the concept an analogy can be made using chemical
phenomena which occur in ice during a change in state. The water molecules in the solid
are more tightly imprisoned compared to those in the liquid; the former can gain mobility
only through a certain amount of heat. A similar situation is encountered in the case of
water imprisoned in hexagonal configurations within the elemental placelets as already
seen in the description of the expansion mechanism. When the speed of the molecules is
sufficient to permit their escape from their tight imprisonment and to move around freely, the
ice becomes water and analogously, in the case at hand, the water between the placelets
becomes pore water. The effects of pressure and temperature during the change in state
are in opposition to each other since the density of the placelet water is greater than that of
the free water. The thermodynamic system that evolves from this state of compaction
requires an expansion rather than a contraction of volume, as it is deduced from the
increase in volume of the formations observed in the compaction of sediments. Therefore
the transition phase consists of the transformation of a denser water, highly oriented in the
placelets, into less dense water, free in the porous space.
In agreement with the Clausius-Clapeyron equation, the conclusion is that the pressure,
contrary to the temperature, does not fundamentally affect the phenomenon. In fact, it has
been verified that increasing pressure by thousands of atmospheres is approximately equal
to raising the temperature by 10%. Thus, changes of pressure with depth appear to be too
small to have any significant thermodynamic effect on the clay-water system. This
affirmation modifies the generally accepted theory that the increase in pressure due to
burial was responsible for compaction and overpressure. The amount of water freed is
equal to 10-15% of the volume of the formation.
In the third stage, the increase in volume of the water, having a density equals to that of
capillary water, is gradually reduced in the elemental placelets due to a further increase in
temperature. This final dehydration stage is very slow, requiring tens or even hundreds of
millions of years to reach completion.
Figure 2.13 shows the progression of the expelled water curve against depth. A comparable
progression is to be found for permeability and porosity.
ARPO IDENTIFICATION CODE PAGE 36 OF 299
ENI S.p.A.
Agip Division REVISION
STAP-P-1-M-6130 0
As far as the origin of overpressures are concerned Bursts theory agrees with Powers. In
both the Powers and Burst theories it is advanced that the dehydration may be the principal
cause of the creation of overpressures at the depths considered.
Magara disagrees with this theory. According to the analyses performed by this author, the
liberation of 10-15% of crystalline water, as foreseen by Burst, may provoke an increase of
2% in clay density, while the calculations performed by Magara, using the density log, lead
to conclude an increase of 6% in density. In the same way, other areas of disagreement
with the theories of Powers and Burst are to be found. In this way, Magara reaches the
conclusion that the dehydration of Montmorillonitic clays is not the principal cause of
overpressures.
Sulphate Diagenesis
It is known that the change of calcium sulphate (CaSO4) from its hydrate state, i.e. gypsum
(CaSO4, 2H2O) into its anhydrous state, i.e. anhydrite (CaSO4), is a reaction connected to
the post-sedimentary diagenetic process. Such reaction involves water release and a 40%
volume reduction of gypsum. When the released water cannot flow freely due to the
presence of permeability barriers, overpressures develop affecting the formations at their
top and/or at their base.
The phenomenon is reversible, i.e. anhydrite may become hydrated with the consequent
1
15-25% volume increase for its semi-hydrate (CaSO4, /2 H2O) up to a 40% for its hydrated
state, that is, gypsum.
It is needless to say that even a partial reaction in a closed system, which does not allow for
dilatation, will cause high overpressures.
This process can only get started when there is a variation in at least one of the factors
contributing to keeping salts in solution; ie, temperature, pressure, composition of the
solution, and concentration of each singe component.
Overpressure conditions may also be created in a hydraulically open system. During
sediment compaction, secondary precipitation may decrease the permeability to such a
degree that it may, impede the flow of the liquids present in the pores before burial.
The osmotic phenomenon needs a true membrane in order to develop. Young and Low
conducted experiments using typical clay samples and solutions at varying concentrations.
They got results which differed rather a lot from the theory and they concluded that the
clays known as semi-permeable did not actually fall under this definition, due to the possible
existence of microfissures, high concentrations of fine silica inside the pores and other
irregularities.
Although the studies on the behaviour of clay as semi-permeable membranes lead to
controversial conclusions, the osmotic phenomenon may be of some importance as one
cause, though not always primary, of overpressure.
ARPO IDENTIFICATION CODE PAGE 42 OF 299
ENI S.p.A.
Agip Division REVISION
STAP-P-1-M-6130 0
2.2.4. Tectonics
Introduction
In the course of their history, the rocks present in the earths crust undergo deformations
due to stresses of tectonic origin (dislocation), which modify their original geological
structure.
The sedimentary rocks are almost always of marine origin, except for the case of deltaic or
coastal sediments and for this reason are deposited almost horizontally on the sea bottom:
If any region, flat or mountainous, appears to be formed of similarly horizontal layers, this
means that the zone has undergone a simple vertical movement (vertical uplift) without
disturbing the original depositional condition; otherwise, if the layers show a different
orientation, the movement undergone must have been caused by stresses, known as
tectonic, oriented in different directions.
Tectonic stresses have a mostly horizontal orientation, so much as to be called tangential to
the earths surface. These stresses may be compressive or tensile or tend to rotate two
parallel surfaces of a body in opposite directions with shearing effects.
The rocks, tectonically stressed, are either deformed plastically or are fractured, and at
times both conditions occur. Among the several types of dislocation due to tectonic
phenomena, the following stand out:
Folds: Tangential stresses (orogenic) along the earths trust cause rock masses
to fold repeatedly giving rise to more or less complex structures, the surfaces of
which are exposed to erosion. Folds are classified according to structure, origin
and type of deformation. The main fold types are: monoclines, anticlines or
upfolds and synclines or troughs or down folds. The central part of a fold is the
core; the hinge line coincides with maximum curvature; the sides or limbs meet
at the hinge line; the axial plane passes through the hinge line while the axis
through the core.
The vergence refers to the direction of inclination.
Faults :are fractures with displacement; i.e. a relative displacement of the two
sides. The displacement can have either a vertical or horizontal component, or
both.
For the most part, deformations are of tectonic origin and, therefore, caused by strains or
oriented stresses that were produced in the course of orogenesis; but they may also be of
other origins such as magmatic or diapiric intrusions, effects of gravity, etc.
ARPO IDENTIFICATION CODE PAGE 44 OF 299
ENI S.p.A.
Agip Division REVISION
STAP-P-1-M-6130 0
Figure 2.17 - Passages From A Recumbent Fold To A Fault-Fold (3) (After Moret)
Figure 2.18 - Diapiric Structures (A1, A2) And Origin Of A Salt Dome (A3)
ARPO IDENTIFICATION CODE PAGE 46 OF 299
ENI S.p.A.
Agip Division REVISION
STAP-P-1-M-6130 0
3. SEISMIC METHODS
The only way to obtain information, prior to well drilling, on the nature and characteristics of
the subsurface, is through geophysical prospecting.
The most important and extensively used geophysical method for oil prospecting is the
seismic reflection method. Although seismograms are used mainly by geophysicists and
geologists for subsurface structural and lithological interpretation, recently they have also
become of great interest and help to the drilling engineer.
Two of the most important applications of seismic data are in the detection of formations
characterised by abnormal pressures and in the forecasting of probable pressure gradients.
Experience has shown that starting with good seismic data and proper interpretation, it is
possible in most cases to pin-point the overpressure tops within 100 to 200m of their
location. Pore pressure gradients can be estimated with an approximation of .0.15 -
2
0.20kg/km 10m of the real values in the well; even better approximations are obtained
when calculating overburden gradients. Naturally, the determination of fracture gradients is
strictly dependent on the correct evaluation of the pore pressure gradients.
Before discussing how to calculate pressure gradients by means of seismic data, the basic
principles of seismic methods used in the Oil Industry must be discussed, with particular
attention paid to the seismic reflection method.
Vibrations in a medium can be longitudinal or transverse, the former when vibration occurs
in the same direction as the perturbation propagation the latter when the medium vibrates
perpendicularly to this direction. These two types of waves belong to a group called body
waves, propagating in a homogeneous, infinite medium; in any case, when the medium is
stratified or has a free surface, another type of wave can be generated (surface waves),
the most common being the Rayleigh and Love waves, of minor importance from the
seismic point of view.
This means that in a solid medium the longitudinal waves are always faster, around twice as
fast, than the transverse waves. In particular if = 0.25, the ratio Vp / Vs = 3 it means that
the P wave is 1.7 times faster than the S wave.
If a liquid, in which = 0 is considered, it can be seen that the transverse waves do not
propagate.
In Table 3.1the velocities of propagation of several fluid and solid media, are shown.
Medium Temperature oc Vp, m/sec Vs, m/sec Vp/Vs
Air 0 331 - -
Hydrogen 0 1270 - -
Carbon Dioxide 0 416 - -
Helium 0 871 - -
Water 19 1461 - -
Steel 19 6110 3230 1.89
Glass 79 4740 2830 1.68
Copper 19 5080 2250 2.26
Table 3.1- Wave Velocity in Common Materials
Because of the presence of these various kinds of disturbances, the improvement of the
signal-to-noise-ratio is a major objective in the recording of the signal; this objective is
reached in seismic prospection, in which signal source and signal detector are both under
control, by strengthening the signal (stronger source), decreasing the noise, particularly the
coherent noise (locating explosives at greater depth and proper geophone arrays), and
finally by using detectors of appropriate sensitivity (frequency band width outside that of the
main noise).
ARPO IDENTIFICATION CODE PAGE 55 OF 299
ENI S.p.A.
Agip Division REVISION
STAP-P-1-M-6130 0
Acoustic Impedance
Medium Density g/cm2 Velocity Vp m/sec
Z(g/sec cm2) x 104
Anhydrite 2.82 - 2.93 3,500 5,500 99 161
Basalt 2.70 3.30 5,500 6,300 149 208
Chalk 1.94 2.23 2,100 4,200 41 94
Clay 1.50 2.50 1,100 2,500 17 63
Dolomite 2.75 2.85 3,500 6,900 96 197
Granite 2.52 2.82 4,750 6,000 120 169
Gypsum 2.31 2.33 2,000 3,500 46 81
Limestone 2.58 2.80 3,400 7,000 88 196
Marl 2.25 2.86 2,000 3,500 45 100
o
Oil 0.60 0.90 1,275(23 C) 8 11
Air 0,0013 330 0.004
Water 0.98 1.01 1,430 590 14 16
Salt 2.14 2.18 4,200 5,500 90 120
Sand 1.60 1.90 600 1,850 10 35
Sandstone 2.15 2.70 2,100 4,500 45 122
Shale 2.41 2.81 2,700 4,800 65 135
Table 3.2 - Velocity of Longitudinal Waves in Various Mediums
ARPO IDENTIFICATION CODE PAGE 59 OF 299
ENI S.p.A.
Agip Division REVISION
STAP-P-1-M-6130 0
The density of a rock, and therefore the velocity of propagation of seismic waves through it,
is affected by several factors, such as:
Geological age: the increase in velocity with depth is greater for younger
sedimentary rocks.
Porosity: porosity increments cause a decrease of velocity.
Elastic anisotropy: due to layering in sedimentary and metamorphic rocks, the
velocity in the direction parallel to a layer is always greater than across it.
Humidify: liquids decrease seismic velocity, when this is above 1,400m/sec.
Lithic nature e.g. an increase in silica content decreases velocity, whereas an
increase in carbonates increases velocity.
Tx =
1
V0
(
4Z2 + 4Z x sin
1/ 2
) Eq. 3.10
where:
Tx = Total travel time
Vo = Velocity of seismic wave
X = Distance shot point-receiver
Z = Perpendicular distance between shot point and reflector (depth)
= Dip angle of layer
When the reflective layer is horizontal ( = 0) (Figure 3.10), the general Eq. 3.10 becomes:
Tx
1
V0
(
4z 2 + x 2 )1/ 2 Eq. 3.11
If the receiver is located on the shot-point, i.e. if x = 0, the travel time will be:
z Eq. 3.12
T0 = 2
V0
where:
To = Two-way vertical time
ARPO IDENTIFICATION CODE PAGE 64 OF 299
ENI S.p.A.
Agip Division REVISION
STAP-P-1-M-6130 0
The general Eq. 3.10 can therefore be re-written in the following way:
Tx =
1
Vo
(
V02 + x 2 + 2xt 0 V0 sin )
1/ 2 Eq. 3.13
2z cos
Tm =
Vo
For a horizontal reflector, the curve time-distance for all points between the shot-point S
and the receiver, is a hyperbola with apex at point x = 0; the relative time T0 corresponds to
the vertical reflection and represents the hyperbolas apex. This apex is not symmetrical in
relation to the time axis but is shifted by 2z sen for layers inclined at angle . The angle
is assumed negative when the layer dips in the direction receiver-shot-point, positive in the
opposite case.
In the case of a horizontal reflector, Eq. 3.11 is better explained by the following example. in
Figure 3.11, SS represents the earth surface on which the shot-point (point O) and the
geophones (point W) are located. When the explosion takes place, the seismic waves
propagate in all directions. The wave, propagating vertically, strikes the reflecting plane RR
and is sent back surface along the vertical path OPO , where it is recorded by a geophone
at point O.
The waves generated by the explosion also strike reflector RR along a multitude of diagonal
paths (e.g., path OT) and are sent back to surface along path TW. The times, T0 and
required by the seismic waves to cover distances OPO and OTW respectively, are
recorded by geophones at points O and W, separated by the distance x. With this
information, it is possible to calculate, both the depth z of the reflecting horizon and the
wave velocity V0 in the interval considered, by applying the following equations:
OPO = T0 x V0 = 2z Eq. 3.14
OTW = Tx x V0 Eq. 3.15
Extending segment OP vertically down to its specular point O, from the fundamental laws
of optics, it derives that:
OTW = O' TW
OPO = O' PO
ARPO IDENTIFICATION CODE PAGE 67 OF 299
ENI S.p.A.
Agip Division REVISION
STAP-P-1-M-6130 0
and therefore:
Eq. 3.16
O' TW 2 = O' PO 2 + OW 2
Tx =
1
V0
(
4z 2 + x 2 )1/ 2 Eq. 3.18
Tx =
1
(4z 2 + x 2 )1/ 2
Vo
after the shot the following terms are known, because they have been measured:
x = Distance between shot-point and geophones
Tx = Time lag between shore and signal reception at the geophone
Both Vo and z are still to be determined, giving an equation with two unknown factors. The
solution of this equation, in terms of depth, is carried out by determining the velocity of
propagation of the seismic wave based on one of the methods subsequently described. The
determination of the velocity is of fundamental importance, since wrong estimates of this
parameter can lead to totally distoned representations of geological situations and introduce
extreme errors in calculating pressure gradients.
The main methodologies for estimating reflection velocities are the following:
Well Shooting
Well shooting involves suspending a geophone or hydrophone inside the well by means of
a cable and recording the time necessary for the energy to travel from the shot-point, close
to the well, to the geophone location (Figure 3.12). The geophone is constructed to
withstand the high pressure and temperature common in oil wells. The cable has a threefold
role: it supports the geophone, measures the depth at which it is working, and contains
conductors that bring signals to surface for recording.
The shots are fired at one or more points near the wellhead. Between one shot and the
next, the geophone is moved to obtain a set of travel times from surface down to various
depths. Geophone depths are selected to include the most important geological markers,
such as tops of formations, stratigraphic unconformities as well as intermediate positions so
that the interval between two successive measurements is small enough to assure
reasonable accuracy (often 200m apart).
Figure 3.13. shows the results of a typical well survey. The vertical travel time t, relative to
depth z, is obtained by multiplying the measured time,tm. by the factor z / z + x 2 to
correct for the effective distance between the geophone and shot-point, i.e.:
z Eq. 3.21
t = tm x
x2 + z
2
The average velocity between surface and depth z is given by the ratio:
ARPO IDENTIFICATION CODE PAGE 70 OF 299
ENI S.p.A.
Agip Division REVISION
STAP-P-1-M-6130 0
z Eq. 3.22
Vm =
t
Figure 3.13. gives the average velocity Vm and the vertical travel time t as a function of
depth, z. If depth and time relative to two different shots are subtracted and divided one by
the other, the interval velocity, Vint, or the average velocity in the interval (zm - zm), is
obtained:
zm zn Eq. 3.23
Vint =
t m tn
Shooting a well gives the average velocity with good accuracy of measurement. It is,
however, an expensive method as it involves not only the cost of a half to one day of a
seismic crew, but also the stand-by time of the rig itself, which is often higher than the
seismic operation itself.
Figure 3.13 - Representation Of Average Velocity (V) And Interval Velocity (Vi) Versus Depth
ARPO IDENTIFICATION CODE PAGE 72 OF 299
ENI S.p.A.
Agip Division REVISION
STAP-P-1-M-6130 0
2
x r Method
This method is based on the equation:
x2 2 Eq. 3.24
t2 = 2
t0
VRMS
Plotting as a function of x, a straight line is obtained with a slope equal to 1/V2RMS whose
2
intercept on the time axis, for x = 0, is t . Having determined. for each reflector, both VRMS
and to, we can calculate the corresponding depth. The same procedure is repeated for all
other reflectors. (Figure 3.15).
2 2
The analysis of the x - t diagram can supply sufficiently accurate data on the velocity at
the condition that:
1) The recordings are of good quality and have a sufficient number of reflections
2) Accurate corrections are made on the events taking place near the surface
3) Field work and seismic data interpretation are carried out with accuracy
4) The velocity distribution is simple (there must not be lateraI variations in velocity or
particularly complex structures)
ARPO IDENTIFICATION CODE PAGE 73 OF 299
ENI S.p.A.
Agip Division REVISION
STAP-P-1-M-6130 0
Once the velocities, regarding the two successive and parallel reflectors, have been
determined using the equation:
X2 Eq. 3.24
t = 2 + t 20
2
VRSM
where:
1/ 2 Eq. 3.25
n n
VRMS = V02 / t i
i=1 i =1
the interval velocity Vint can be determined by applying Dixs formula.
2
Indicating with VRRMS,n the root mean square velocity regarding the n-th reflection, and
wth VRMS,n-1 the velocity regarding the next overlaying reflection, we have:
n n 1 n Eq. 3.26
V
i=1
i
2
t i = Vi2 t i + Vint2 t int = Vn2 t i
i=1 i=1
n 1 n Eq. 3.27
V
i =1
i
2
ti = Vn21 ti
i =1
2
Introducing Eq. 3.27 in Eq. 3.26 and solving for Vint we obtain Dixs formula:
n n 1
Eq. 3.28
2
v int = v n2 t i v n21 t i / t int
i=1 i=1
t - t Method
The t - t method is based on equation:
x2 Eq. 3.29
t n
2V 2 t o
that can also be written in the form:
X Eq. 3.30
V=
2 to t n
With a symmetric geophone set-up, the term tn can be calculated from the arrival times of
a reflection at the shot-point (to) and at the outside geophone group.
The values of tn obtained with this method are prone to large errors, mainly because of
the uncertainties in the correction of near-surface events. To obtain results of some
usefulness, it is necessary to have a great number of measurements available that are
subsequently averaged in the hope that environmental variations and other uncertainties be
reduced to an acceptable level the t - t analyses usually require hundreds of recordings.
ARPO IDENTIFICATION CODE PAGE 76 OF 299
ENI S.p.A.
Agip Division REVISION
STAP-P-1-M-6130 0
The transit time interval between the two Sonic Log receivers is measured by an instrument
that automatically records the signal arrival at each of the two receivers and computes the
time interval. Since the signal at the receiver is not a sharp pulse, the detector is activated
by the first peak (or trough) which exceeds a certain threshold value. At times, detectors are
nor activated by the same peak (or trough) arriving simultaneously at the two receivers,
therefore causing a fictitious increment in transit time. This effect, called cycle-skip, is
readily seen on the Sonic Log and it is easily allowed for, since the error is exactly equal to
the known interval between two successive cycles of the pulse.
The Sonic Log is automatically integrated to obtain the total transit time and recorded on the
log as a function of depth by a sequence of pips at 1msec intervals. However, there is a
certain tendency to accumulate small systematic errors in the integrated result and,
therefore, check shots are made at the base and top of the sonic log that the effect of the
cumulative error can be reduced by distributing the different linearly with depth. The sonde
often includes a seismometer of the type used for the well shooting to facilitate the taking
of the check shots.
Sonic Logs are generally used for porosity determination, since porosity seems to be
dominant in seismic velocity. Although seismic logs are of great help to the geophysicist,
they are not usually carried out for geophysical purposes and, as a consequence, they
often do not give all the information the geophysicist would require. For example, check
shots are not necessary for the determination of porosity and therefore are frequently
omitted; in addition, the log normally does not cover the whole well profile and it is rarely
recorded in shallow part of the well. As a consequence, data from the Sonic Log are
frequently incomplete and, in order to calculate velocities, assumptions must be made,
where data are missing to the detriment of accuracy.
3-Readings Method
This is the method most used at present to calculate reflector characteristics, i.e. depth, dip
and velocity of sound wave propagation, using only readings from reflection seismics. The
method is illustrated by the case in Figure 3.16. The data of the problem are as follows:
point x Is the shot-point;
points x1, x2, x3 Are the distances of geophones from shot-point x.
After the shot, the return energy from the reflecting layer is recorded by the three
geophones after the following times:
Tx1 = 1.639 sec
Tx2 = 1.802 sec
Tx3 = 1.984 sec
The problem is solved by applying the general Eq. 3.10 of reflection, tying the reflection
time to the models geometric parameters; i.e:
Tx =
1
v
(4z 2
+ x 2 + 4zx sin ) Eq. 3.10
This equation must be solved in terms of z,, Vo. Having the data relative to the three
points of recording, recorded and known, it is possible to obtain and solve a second grade
system of three equations with three unknowns:
Tx2.1 =
1
Vo2
(
4z 2 + x 12 + 4zx 1 sin ) Eq. 3.31
Tx2.2
1
( )
= 2 4z 2 + x 22 + 4zx 2 sin
vo
where:
TX2,2 Eq. 3.35
a = X1 x2
Tx2,1
Tx22 Eq. 3.36
b = x 22 x12
Tx21
In this example, entering the starting data into the various equations, the following values
are obtained for the three unknowns:
z = 1,498m
o
sin = 0.4962 ( =33 )
Vo = 1997 m/sec
Rounding off readings of reflection times can lead to considerable variations, which may not
be ignored. Had the reflection times been corrected to two decimal figures, as is usually
done in practice:
Tx,1 = 1.64sec
Tx,2 = 1.80sec
Tx,3 = 1.98sec
In surveys carried out with explosives, the second event is the up-hole break, that is the
signal comes directly from the shot and is important in making corrections for surface
effects. The first group of events to be recorded progressively on all traces, is made up of
first breaks caused by the first arrival of signals at the various geophones, beginning from
those nearest to the source. The first breaks represent that part of the signal which, having
entered the first superficial layer with an angle of incidence not inferior to the critical angle,
is refracted, travels along the lower interface and then returns to surface where it: is
recorded. Since first break recordings take place consecutively for the various geophone
groups, their peaks will align along lines diverging in one or more directions from the trace
of the group nearest to the source, according to the layout of the geophones. Reflected
signals will then begin to appear; they, too, will be received excessively, since ray-paths
from a same reflector; increase with increasing source-geophone distance. The line joining
reflection peaks on the seismogram is a curve with its apex on the source and downward
concavity. Supposing ray-paths drawn vertically downwards, the situation depicted in Figure
3.20is reached. The curving, caused by the geometry of: the survey method, obviously
becomes less prominent in deeper reflections. During data processing, appropriate
corrections in the survey geometry are introduced and consequently reflections can better
reveal the setting of the layers. As previousIy seen, the curved line joining r:eflection peaks
is a hyperbola called reflection hyperbola.
Figure 3.17 - Peaks and Troughs Represent the Greatest Vertical Oscillations Of Ground
(Subjected to Seismic Vibration)
ARPO IDENTIFICATION CODE PAGE 82 OF 299
ENI S.p.A.
Agip Division REVISION
STAP-P-1-M-6130 0
Static Correction
To obtain a seismic secretion truly representative of the geological structure of the area in
consideration, the times of a seismic trace must always be referred to paths with beginning
and end lying on an adequate reference plane.
The static correction is essentially a time variation, that may be a shortening or a
lengthening, applied to each trace to reduce the observed reflection time to a well-defined
reference plane, normally a selected elevation above sea level, and referred to as a datum
plane (Figure 3.22) . This reference elevation should be set below the heterogeneous
superficial cover, but this is not always possible nor necessary; rather, it is enough that the
datum plane be positioned so that the static corrections are calculated with sufficient
accuracy.
ARPO IDENTIFICATION CODE PAGE 85 OF 299
ENI S.p.A.
Agip Division REVISION
STAP-P-1-M-6130 0
The value of the total static correction, t, depends on the following factors:
Perpendicular distance from source to reference plane.
Surface topography, that is, the perpendicular distance from the receiver to the
reference plane.
Velocity variations within the superficial .layer along the seismic line.
Thickness variation in the superficial layer.
The total static correction, t, is given by the sum of two distinct corrections: the receiver
correction, tr and the source correction, ts. To determine tr and ts, it is necessary to
know the surface elevation with reference to the selected reference plane, the depth of the
source and to have sufficient information on the characteristic of the superficial layer.
Dynamic Correction
After the application of the static correction, the resulting recording effectively lie on the
same reference plane. If a reflected event from a family of CDP traces is now examined, it
can be seen that going from one trace to another, the event describes a hyperbola
expressed by the usual equation:
x2
Tx = t o2 +
v2
setting:
Tx t o = T
we obtain:
Eq. 3.37
X2
T = + t 2o t o
V2
The quantity (T = Tx - to) is usually referred to as normal moveout, NMO or dynamic
correction and is a function of the gradual offset of the receiver from the shot-point, of the
average velocity V, and of the two way vertical time, to.
Eq. 3.37 can also be written in the form:
x Eq. 3.38
V=
2t o T + (T )2
If the offset of the geophone from the shot-point is sufficiently small compared to the depth
of the reflective layer, in other words if the term (x/V to) < 1, T can be determined, with a
certain approximation, by Eq. 3.30, written in the form:
x
T
2t 0 V 2
t must be determined as accurately as possible for the processing of seismic data. Usually
both x and to are known, being quantities that are measured. The accuracy in the
determination of t depends therefore largely on how the average velocity has been
estimated. Errors in the estimation of V consequently cause errors in the valuation of T;
such errors, described as NMO residuals and indicated with the symbol T, are given by:
2
T = Te - T
2
Eq. 3.39
where:
T = Dynamic correction relative to the real velocity, V
Te = Dynamic correction relative to the velocity, Ve, actually utilised in the
calculations
X2 1 1 Eq. 3.40
T=
2
2 2
2t 0 V
e V
This formula shows how positive values of T are obtained, and therefore over-corrections,
2
when: Ve <V, and negative values, and therefore under-corrections, when Ve < V. Figure
3.23. schematically shows how, in various situations, different types of NMO residuals may
appear. In deriving the t expression, the seismic wave path was assumed to be rectilinear;
this assumption implies a constant velocity in the interval considered. Obviously it is a
working hypothesis, correct only for a homogeneous medium, very rarely found in practice.
A better and more realistic likeness between the structural model and the real geological
situation is obtained by introducing the root mean square velocity, VRMS, in place of the
average velocity V in the expression defining t this gives results better depicting the
effective curvilinear course of paths.
Applying adequate dynamic correction. the reflection time is transformed into two way
vertical time. Considering the same CDP, reflected events will fall in a straight line. A perfect
alignment of events, or t = 0, is reached by the appropriate selection of velocity that can
2
When an interval velocity log, obtained from the velocity analysis of a nearby well, is
available, the dynamic correction can be made using this type of data directly; such data
can be processed, as already seen, in average velocity V, or root-mean-square velocity,
VRMS.
These conditions are not always present and in zones of complex and tectonised geology
stacking can be very difficult and give unreliable results.
ARPO IDENTIFICATION CODE PAGE 90 OF 299
ENI S.p.A.
Agip Division REVISION
STAP-P-1-M-6130 0
Deconvolution
This operation can be described essentially as an inverse filtering, done with the purpose of
recovering the original signal sent into the ground or, more exactly, it has the purpose of
rebuilding the reflections as they would appear if we could entirely compensate the
dispersive effects of the medium crossed.
The trace picked up at the geophone is not impulsional, since the energy source that
created the wave is never perfectly impulsive, nor does the geophone exit tension faithfully
repeat the instant velocity of the ground. In addition, there are distortions due to multiple
reflections between various strata. AIl these effects cause undesirable distortions of the
trace; the purpose of deconvolution is to bring back the trace, as far as it is possible, to its
impulsive shape.
Filtering
Great care is dedicated during field operations to signal reception. Reduction of coherent
and incoherent noise is assured, although not totally by adequate planning of the trace
shape, increasing the number of geophones for each trace and equipping seismic stations
with special filtering instrumentation. Notwithstanding all the precautions, it is not possible to
obtain total elimination of the noise by acting only on field data. A further reduction of noise
is obtained by filtering during the processing of seismic data. After defining the recorded
data spectrum, the noise spectrum is also determined and a better suited band-filter is
selected. The further apart the signal and noise spectra are, the more efficient the filter will
be.
Filtering and deconvolution act in opposite way. In filtering some components of the
frequency are subtracted from the recorded data, whereas deconvolution entails their
addition.
Migration
Migration is the processing of the time section, that allows the location in the exact spatial
position, both vertical and horizontal, of pending and in general diffracted events. It has the
purpose of eliminating or reducing all ambiguities that may appear on certain seismic
sections.
ARPO IDENTIFICATION CODE PAGE 91 OF 299
ENI S.p.A.
Agip Division REVISION
STAP-P-1-M-6130 0
Depth Conversion
The process of transforming time sections into depth sections is of extreme importance to
the geophysicist.
The adoption of improper procedures or wrong parameters (velocity, filters, dynamic
correction residuals) may end up in a totally altered geological picture In order to obtain
valid results, it is necessary to migrate the time section before its conversion into depth
section; this is of particular importance mainly in especially complex geological areas. By
rectifying the shape of horizontal reflectors and by removing diffractions through migration,
the base data are free of erroneous and ambiguous information.
An equally important factor is the definition of the velocity. Contrary to the case of migration,
the depth conversion is very sensitive to velocity variations; thus, the velocity to be used
must be the closest possible to the effective velocity of the medium crossed, as far as it can
be deduced from the interpretation and analysis of available data. When the stack velocity
is applied, the velocity values must be corrected for strata dips and the proper and
homogenous choice must be made.
The time-depth conversion is normally carried out multiplying the interval velocity, Vint.i., of
a certain i-th geological unit by the relative one-way interval time, ttint.i and summing the
depth of each single interval; the total depth, hn, down to the bottom of the n-th layer is
given by:
h = (V t int,i )
n n Eq. 3.41
hn = i int,i
i =1 i =1
If the average velocities Vn-1 and Vn in correspondence of the top and bottom of the n-th
layer are available, the corresponding interval velocity Vini.n is obtained from the relation:
n n 1 Eq. 3.42
Vint,n Vn t n Vn1 t n
n =1 n =1
More generally it can be written:
Vn tn Vn 1t n 1 Eq. 3.43
Vint,i =
t n t n 1
where:
ti, ti-1 = Total time to the i-th and ith-1 interface.
If the root mean square velocities VRMSN and VRMSn-1 are known, the Dixs formula can be
applied:
VRMS
2
,n VRMS,n 1 Tn 1
Eq. 3.44
V 2
n=
int
t n t n 1
or:
1/ 2
VRMS Eq. 3.45
,i t 0 VRMS ,i 1 Tn 1
2 2
V 2
=
int n
t n t n 1
ARPO IDENTIFICATION CODE PAGE 92 OF 299
ENI S.p.A.
Agip Division REVISION
STAP-P-1-M-6130 0
Seismic Section
Until the Ninteen Fifties, the only possible presentation of seismic recordings was that
obtained directly in the field as a seismogram (Figure 3.28), containing the trace information
from one spread only, without Normal Move out or static corrections; thus reflections
looked curved and showed irregularities due to the different geophone elevations and to
variations of the near-surface layer. These seismograms were used by tying each
reflection to the corresponding one in the following seismogram, in other words calculating
the time T of the reflection and the relative T (difference in reflection time between the
outermost geophones of the spread). Thereafter, each reflection on the seismogram was
transferred onto a distance-depth graph, using the pair of values T, t and the average
velocity law for the zone, thus obtaining the cross section (Figure 3.29).
With the introduction of magnetic recording, analogic at the beginning and then digital it
became possible not only to correct the seismograms for NMO and statistics, but also to get
several seismograms, on the same photographic sheet, i.e. the seismic section or record
section (Figure 3.30).
Seismic sections have the considerable advantage over cross-sections of offering a large
amount of seismic data, with a much more detailed subsurface picture. In addition, the
recognition of the reflection continuity is immediate, as is also the presence of faults and the
identification of multiples and diffractions.
Seismic sections show distances on horizontal scale. Such distances are expressed as
station numbers and the numeration is referred to depth points and not to surface ones
(traces are reported relative to the middle point shot point-geophone). Time is generally on
the vertical scale with time lines at regular intervals.
lt is possible to illustrate seismic traces in many different ways, thus making it possible to
have various presentations of the same seismic section:
Variable amplitude section or wiggle section (Figure 3.31): it is a presentation in
which each seismic trace is shown as a continuous line whose amplitude, with
reference to the time axis, varies proportionally with the intensity of the seismic
signal;
Variable area section (Figure 3.32): it is a presentation in which the trace is
darkened on one side or the other of the zero line (or, more precisely, of the
zero amplitude line);
Variable density section (Figure 3.33): in this presentation, the trace is a band,
as wide as the interval between traces, in which the colour intensity varies in
shades of grey from black to white, proportional to the signal amplitude;
Composite wiggle and variable area section (Figure 3.34) this case the seismic
trace is simultaneously shown in wiggle and in variable area; the zero line of
variable area can be shifted with reference to the zero of the wiggle to obtain
the variable area only on peaks (Figure 3.35)
Composite wggle and variable density section (Figure 3.36) is a representation
in which the seismic trace is simultaneously presented in wiggle and in variable
density.
ARPO IDENTIFICATION CODE PAGE 93 OF 299
ENI S.p.A.
Agip Division REVISION
STAP-P-1-M-6130 0
Figure 3.23 - Types Of Residual NMO (From Seismic Exploration, H.N. Al-Sadi).
Figure 3.24 Effect of Static and Dynamic Correction Effects of a CDP Trace
ARPO IDENTIFICATION CODE PAGE 95 OF 299
ENI S.p.A.
Agip Division REVISION
STAP-P-1-M-6130 0
Figure 3.26 - Stack Response as Function of Stack Velocity (from Seismic Exploration, H.N Al-
Sadi)
ARPO IDENTIFICATION CODE PAGE 97 OF 299
ENI S.p.A.
Agip Division REVISION
STAP-P-1-M-6130 0
Figure 3.27 - Stack Response as Function Of Stack Velocity (from SEISMIC EXPLORATION,
H.N. AL-SADI)
ARPO IDENTIFICATION CODE PAGE 98 OF 299
ENI S.p.A.
Agip Division REVISION
STAP-P-1-M-6130 0
The explosives mainly used for this purpose are dynamite and ammonium nitrate.
Dynamite is a mixture of nitro-glycerine and gelatine, which form the explosive component,
and an inert material which binds the mixture.
The detonation velocity, or the propagation velocity of the explosion inside the explosive
material, is very high (6,000-7,000m/sec). Consequently, the seismic pulses generated have
steep wave fronts in comparison to other energy sources. This high-energy concentration is
desirable as far as seismic analysis, but detrimental from the viewpoint of damage caused
to the structures close the shot-point.
Ammonium nitrate is cheaper and less dangerous because of its slower detonation.
Together with nitrocarbonitrite (NCN), it is the most commonly used explosive.
The charge is packaged in 5cm diameter plastic tubes containing 1 to 5kg of explosive. The
tubes are built in such a way that they can be easily connected end to end in order to obtain
different amounts for specific uses. A metal cylinder, containing a resistance wire imbedded
in a mixture of gun powders, is used to start the explosion. By means of two electric wires
issuing from the upper cylinder or cap, a current is passed through the resistor, and the
heat generated thereby starts the explosion that detonates the whole charge. The current,
causing the blasting cap to explode, is derived from a blaster, a charge-discharge device of
a high potential capacitor. Incorporated in the blaster is a device generating an electric
pulse at the instant that the explosion starts: this time break pulse defines the starting time,
I = 0, and is transmitted by radio or a telephone tine to the recording equipment.
There are essentially two basic disadvantages of the explosive sources:
Having to drill shot-holes for the charges (this operation requires massive
equipment and extensive manpower and can be particularly difficult and costly
in many regions, particularly in the desert or in the mountains).
The danger of the explosives and the consequent restriction of their use to
locations which are far from inhabited zones and the risks related to the
transport, storage and handling of the charges.
ARPO IDENTIFICATION CODE PAGE 105 OF 299
ENI S.p.A.
Agip Division REVISION
STAP-P-1-M-6130 0
In order to maximise the quantity of energy transmitted to the ground, the holes are usually
filled with water or heavy mud to prevent pressure generated by the explosion form
escaping to the surface. The effect of the mud is to increase the shot efficiency and to
improve the signal quality.
In areas where noticeable background noise exists, the shot-points are often positioned
according to linear or aerial arrays in order to reduce noise.
2) Sources with Distributed Explosive Charges (Multiple Charges)
Primacord
It has just been described above how incidental noise can be reduced by replacing the
single charge with a number of properly spaced, smaller charges. The greater strengthening
of the vertical energy, with respect to the horizontally travelling superficial waves, can be
obtained by means of the progressive explosion of multiple charges which are connected by
a detonating cord called Primacord. The first shot occurs at one end of the line and then
spreads all along the line at a much higher speed (about 7,000m/sec) than that of the
seismic signal in the material surrounding the charges.
The series of charges can be placed vertically along the well or distributed horizontally, like
a long fuse, along a distance of a couple of hundred metres at a constant depth of a few
metres in the subsurface in order to eliminate the incoherent noise and increase the
efficiency of the energy transfer to the ground.
The principal aspects related to the technique of serial explosion of small charges are
charge size, spacing and detonation rate
Detonating Cord-Geoflex
In this method the energy source is again the explosive, the difference being that the
charge is not concentrated in different points, but uniformly distributed along a detonating
cord with a detonating speed of about 7,000m/sec. The cord, coiled in skeins, is stretched
along a furrow 20-50cm deep by means of a special plough pulled by a tractor; the plough
automatically cuts the furrow, stretches and buries the cord.
This system simulates fairly well the effect of a group of superficial shot-holes, with the
advantage that a higher proportion of the generated energy in form of elastic deformation is
transmitted to the ground. In fact the proportion of energy dispersed in form of permanent
deformation is relatively low as compared to a conventional explosive, because of the low
explosive concentration per metre of cord (10 - 20 grams per metre).
Another advantage comes from the great flexibility of usage of the plough-tractor system in
areas of rough morphology, since it is much easier to manoeuvre than the heavy vehicles
needed for drilling. On the other hand, the system has the disadvantage of generating a
strong acoustic wave because of the near-surface depth at which the cord is exploded.
One type of detonating cord is the Geoflex, which is 0.5-lcm in diameter and whose core is
pentaheritrol tetranitrate. The system, which uses the Geoflex, is called Geoseis (GSI:
Geophysical Service Inc).
ARPO IDENTIFICATION CODE PAGE 106 OF 299
ENI S.p.A.
Agip Division REVISION
STAP-P-1-M-6130 0
Non-Explosive Sources
Weight Dropper
The first non-explosive energy source used in hydrocarbon exploration was a device called
Thumper or Weight Dropper conceived by MC Cullom Geophysical and marketed in 1953.
It is based on a pulse sent into the ground by the free fall of a 3ton steel mass from a height
of about three metres. The weight is installed on a suitable vehicle and is lifted from the
ground by means of a track system soon after the impact, so that it can be released again
in a few seconds. The time interval between the release of the weight and its impact on the
ground is not sufficiently constant to allow the simultaneous use of two sources. Two or
three units in succession are often used, producing alternating drops located close to one
another.
The distance from the source to the closest geophones is considerably greater than in the
case of dynamite; in this way, the reflections are recorded before the arrival of the lower
velocity surface waves which are generated in large quantity by the impact with the ground.
Different linear or grid layouts may be used for the drop-points. The layout choice depends
on the level of the noise to be eliminated and on the ground morphology.
The use of the weight dropping is now restricted to the desert or semi-desert areas where
large vehicles can move about easily.
Dinoseis
In 1962, Sinclair Oil & Gas Company put on the market a new pulse-type superficial seismic
energy source called Dinoseis, based on a gas (propane and oxygen) explosion inside a
closed chamber placed on the ground. The bottom of the chamber on the ground is
moveable: when the explosion takes place, it moves downwards and the impact with the
ground produces a pulse only slightly inferior to that produced by the shot of 250g of
dynamite placed at depth of 1m. In the first models, the detonation chamber was fastened
to the means of transport, and the weight of the vehicle kept the chamber adherent to the
ground; currently, however it is suspended from under the truck.
Following the shot, as a result of the recoil kick, the chamber is immediately lifted from the
ground: in order to prevent it from dropping back and thus producing a second pulse and a
consequent signal distortion, a hydraulic system located on top of the chamber itself,
provides for its arrest. The time interval between the activation and the detonation is
constant, due to the fact that the pulse generator stays on the ground and the signals, that
start the explosion, are sent via radio to the recording system. The simultaneous use of
several units is therefore possible and this makes Dinoseis more advantageous than weight
dropping, in order to obtain a higher energy level and a more favourable signal/noise ratio.
The current practice is to use forty eight geophone groups and to explode the charges in
locations fit for a compositing of the recorded signals. As in the case of the weight dropping,
the minimum distance between the source and the receiver can even be hundreds of
metres in order to prevent interference between the reflected signal and the ground roll
surface waves.
ARPO IDENTIFICATION CODE PAGE 107 OF 299
ENI S.p.A.
Agip Division REVISION
STAP-P-1-M-6130 0
The most recent innovation made in Dinoseis is the SIE (Single Impulse Gun). It is based on
a slightly different principle from that of the traditional Dinoseis, in that the propane-oxygen
mixture is detonated at atmospheric pressure since the explosion chamber is open. The
pressure that must be applied to the plate, in order to assure contact with the ground, is
produced by restricting the exhaust valve.
Dynaseis
The energy producing principle of Dynaseis is the same as in Dinoseis, but the impact on
the ground is produced by a chamber containing compressed air.
Dynapulse
This represents one of the latest innovations in the field of the surface seismic sources.
Developed by the Globe Exploration Company, Dynapulse employs a diesel generator as
the energy source. This energy is stored in a capacitor battery and released in form of a
discharge into a transducer; it is then transferred to the ground through a rubber diaphragm
and a metal plate.
Terrapak
This is made of a steel plate; 1.5m in diameter, that is lifted to a height of about 30cm and
then violently pushed towards the ground by a sudden release of compressed air.
It is possible to change both energy and frequency by adjusting the piston weight and the
air pressure ratios.
Vibroseis
Vibroseis, set up by Continental Oil Company in the 1950s, was probably the second
surface system, chronologically speaking, to be adopted by the geophysical industry,
following the Weight-Dropping systems.
Its principle is unique; in fact, while in the seismic exploration with explosive sources an
extremely short, high energy impulse is passed into the ground, in the case of Vibroseis an
undulatory low energy stress, lasting several secs (7 to 16), is delivered. The frequency
varies progressively in the course of the entire signal.
The above-mentioned difference, when compared to traditional sources, makes Vibroseis
preferable to an explosive, since it is less dangerous to the stability of buildings and
structures located near the energy source. For this reason, it is also possible to use this
system in inhabited areas. This is of great importance for oil exploration, which can be
extended to densely populated areas where, for various safety and accessibility reasons,
the use of explosives would be impossible.
The recording cycle, beginning at the instant the signal is released, continues for several
seconds .after the end of the ground energisation. The returning signal, recorded in the
field, can not be directly interpreted, as it is generally possible with other sources. The
recorded signal and the released signal must be correlated to each other in order to allow
for the production of a signal having the typical aspect of a seismic signal.
ARPO IDENTIFICATION CODE PAGE 108 OF 299
ENI S.p.A.
Agip Division REVISION
STAP-P-1-M-6130 0
In the past, this correlation could only be done in a Data Processing Centre. For some time,
however, it has been possible to do it directly in the field with the recording equipment.
This type of seismic energy source underwent several changes aimed at improving its
contact with the ground, its transmission characteristics and its operation efficiency.
Todays Vibroseis consists of a 2t weight with a hydraulic vibrator controlled by a
continuously varying frequency sinusoidal signal, activated by a starting impulse (beep) sent
by the recording system. Vibroseis operations involve the use of several units, for example
three or four units simultaneously. In the field, the big vehicles move along straight paths,
while in the road, two units operating in tandem are used. The vibrators stop at a pre-
established position to start the sweep, and the intervals between one sweep and the next
can be determined from the total number of sweeps necessary for each shot-point.
Vibroseis, as well as Weight-Dropping and Dinoseis, is used with twenty four, forty eight or
more geophone groups.
Since the signal, sent into the ground, lasts several seconds, the recorded signals reflected
by the various discontinuity surfaces are incoherent and overlap each other. Each reflection
has approximately the same wave shape as the signal sent into the ground, but the wave
train corresponding to each reflector is delayed for the time required to complete the
source-reflector-geophone path. The combination of all the individual reflections is so
diffuse that it cannot produce an interpretable record. The trace correlations assume a
shape that shows the reflections as very high amplitude events, while the rest of the signal
is smooth.
Vibroseis offers the advantage that the energy introduced into the ground can be within the
seismic frequency range, although the signal transmission efficiency is not always constant.
The energy content of a signal from an impulse source cannot be subjected to any control
and, in the case of dynamite, can be influenced by the material in which the explosion
occurs. This does not happen with Vibroseis. Using explosives the best signal/noise ratio is
often maintained only in a limited frequency range, while with Vibroseis the signal to be sent
into the ground can be specifically programmed. A further advantage of Vibroseis is the fact
that the signal, since it lasts several seconds, has a much lower an amplitude close to the
source, when compared to an impulse introducing all the energy into the ground in a few
milliseconds, and therefore Vibroseis has a practically non-existent destruction potential.
The sensitivity of an electromagnetic geophone depends on the force of the magnet, on the
number of turns in the solenoid and on the reciprocal arrangement of the field lines and the
coils; the size is very small (a few cm).
Every seismic detector has its particular oscillation period; in the electromagnetic
geophones the natural period T, depends on the mass m, of the suspended element and
on the spring elasticity coefficient K:
m
T = 2
K
1 K
=
2 m
If the geophone damping component is too small, each vibration produces a resonance
effect that heightens the instrument response in correspondence to its own frequency.
Obviously this effect must be eliminated and this is possible by introducing adequate
damping that makes the geophone response approximately constant for the entire range of
seismic frequencies. In fact, in this case only the geophone outlet signal is an accurate
representation of the ground oscillation.
Geophone Groups
When describing the practical implementation of a seismic survey, the source and the
geophone can be regarded as two single points located at a given distance from each
other; the recorded signal contains information concerning the zone below the middle point
of this distance. In fact, for a long time there was only one geophone for each reception
point in the seismic reflection method.
However, as it has already been seen, the seismic signal due to reflection is mixed with
intense noise caused by various types of surface waves. It is necessary to decrease these
horizontal effects as much as possible, and instead, favour the energy coming from the
deepest layers. For the purpose, the single geophone is now replaced by geophone groups,
connected to each other in series or in parallel and properly laid out on the ground.
The theory of noise attenuation by means of grouping is based on the fundamental principle
that the reflection waves travel along almost vertical paths and then reach the receivers
almost simultaneously, strengthening one another since they are in phase coincidence.
Instead, the horizontal waves hit the single geophones at subsequent times; theoretically, if
the distance between two contiguous geophones is equal to half the noise wave length, the
noise will be completely cancelled, since it is recorded in phase opposition.
The use of geophonc groups is particularly important in zones with considerable surface
noise and n those zones with poor seismic response, caused by poor lithological layer
differentiation.
ARPO IDENTIFICATION CODE PAGE 111 OF 299
ENI S.p.A.
Agip Division REVISION
STAP-P-1-M-6130 0
The number of groups in a spread is normalIy twenty four, forty eight or ninty six, and the
distance between the station points vary from 10 to 50m, therefore the total spread length
may reach several kilometres.
In the case of a horizontal and flat layer, each geophone group receives a reflected wave
from the middle point of the station point - shot point distance; therefore, a spread can give
information on a horizontal length equal to half the spread itself. With this technique the
subsurface is continuously observed, and for this reason it is called continuous survey.
Moreover, this operation carries out a simple coverage or 100% coverage, since each
reflection point is involved in the survey only once.
By the terms multiple coverage survey CDP (Common Depth Point) survey CRP (Common
Reflection Point) survey or Roll Along Survey, it means the reflection seismic survey based
on the sum of various reflected signals from the same depth point, directly carried out in the
recording phase or later in a Data Processing Centre.
The set of traces, relating to different paths which involve the same depth point, is called a
family of traces, while the number of traces indicates the coverage, that is, how many
times the point has been hit by a seismic signal. For example, if the traces are six, it is said
that the survey is in sixth or 600% coverage.
Digital recording can provide a more accurate representation of the seismic signal than can
the anaIogue recording; furthermore, it allows for numerical data processing without
producing relevant distortions. In the intermediate phase seismic Signal is in digital form,
whereas at the beginning (signal to the geophones) and at the end (final representations on
paper for a final visual data evaluation) it is in an analogic form.
A simplified diagram of a digital recording station is shown in Figure 3.41.
Bubble Formaton
An explosion below the sea surface produces a high pressure gas bubble. As long as the
pressure of the gases produced exceeds the hydrostatic pressure of the surrounding water,
the net resulting force will accelerate the water outwards away from the shot-point. The net
force decreases as the bubble expands and becomes zero when, as a result of the
expansion, the gas pressure reaches the value of the hydrostatic pressure. However, at this
point the water has reached the maximum outward velocity and so continues to move
outwards, decelerating since the force is now directed inwards. Eventually, the water tends
to stop and the net inward force now causes the bubble to collapse with a consequent rapid
gas pressure increase, the gas pressure being again directed outwards. At this point bubble
expansion starts again and multiple cycle repetitions take place, albeit with continuously
decreasing energy intensity.
This phenomenon is called bubble oscillation and each oscillation coincides with the
omission of pressure pulses exactly similar to the shock wave produced at the shot instant,
but of continuously decreasing amplitude. Nevertheless, the seismic energy emitted is
appreciable, since the duration of the pressure pulses is relatively long.
For all pulse type energy sources (i.e. for conventional 7.5kg dynamite charges), most of
the energy is concentrated in the first pulse, but the bubbles produced by the explosion
generate additional seismic records every 0.2 to 0.4sec. But these records overlap, so that
it is not possible to determine by which oscillation the reflection event is caused and,
therefore, the data cannot be used. The practice generally adopted in the case of
conventional explosives was to explode the charge at a depth of 2m from the surface in
order to let the bubble vent rapidly.
This system produced spectacular gas and water plumes, but most of the bubble was
dispersed in the water column rise, thus resulting inefficient in generating useful seismic
energy.
ARPO IDENTIFICATION CODE PAGE 114 OF 299
ENI S.p.A.
Agip Division REVISION
STAP-P-1-M-6130 0
Sleeve Exploder Sleeve Exploder is a source of the gas gun type, trailed by the
(Aquapulse- vessel at a depth of about 10m.
Seisprobe) The gun shot chamber has flexible walls, which are made of a
cylindrical steel pipe core around its circumference and of an elastic
rubber sleeve The cylinder is filled with a measured propane-oxygen
mixture that is detonated by a spark plug. The explosion causes a
sudden expansion of the sleeve (Figure 3.45a), producing a pressure
impulse in the surrounding water. When the sIeeve reaches its
maximum expansion, the internal pressure is substantially Iower than
the external hydrostatic pressure This pressure difference combined
with the elastic force of the rubber sleeve, produces a subsequent
contraction that restores the original sleeve shape (Figure 3.45b).
The combustion gases are expelled at the surface through a valve
that opens at the moment the sleeve contracts, thus significantly
alternating the oscillation pulses. The synchronised interval between
the shots is 8-10 seconds. The energy produced can be increased
both by increasing the filling time and by exploding single, double or
triple units.
The Sleeve Exploder is an ESSO patent.Aquapulse is a registered
trademark of Western Geophysical Co., while Seisprobe is a
registered trademark of Seismograph Service Ltd.
The Sleeve Exploder- is one of the most commonly used systems for
marine surveys.
Minisleeve Minisleeve is a miniature version of the Sleeve Exploder used in high
resolution and limited penetration surveys. It is used with multiple
guns and can give a very short pulse; the guns can be detonated
either in sequence, in order to obtain a high coverage, or
simultaneously, in order to achieve greater penetration. The name
Minisleeve is a registered trademark of ESSO.
Non-Conventional Water, Air and Vapour Sources
Hydrosein The Hydrosein system (Western Geophysical Company) is a
pneumatic-type seismic source; it uses two units weighing four tons
each, usually placed at a depth of 15m, with a shot period of about
10 seconds.
High.pressure air is sent into a chamber and, as a result, a metal
plate is abruptly driven away from a second plate fixed to the upper
end of the chamber; this downward acceleration creates an empty
space between the two plates, about 30cm long. Water fills this cavity
and produces a strong seismic pulse of short duration.
ARPO IDENTIFICATION CODE PAGE 118 OF 299
ENI S.p.A.
Agip Division REVISION
STAP-P-1-M-6130 0
Note: In order to better clarify the meaning of the curve in Figure 3.51, the
processing method of the data recorded in the field is briefly explained
below. The data relating to each shot-point are recorded on the
appropriate magnetic tapes; each track reports the data relating to a well
determined shot-point, corresponding, for example, to the 24 recording
stations. Later, the data are re-processed in terms of Common Depth
Point; in other words the data relating to the same reflection point, but
belonging to different shot-points, are summed. The total data are now
available in the form of seismic traces, with the distance of the geophone
from the shot-point on the average and the reflection times on the
ordinates. The signal reception times rise with the increase in distance of
the receiver from the shot-point, according to a hyperbolic curve given by
the equation:
x2 Eq. 3.46
t 2o +
Tx2 = 4
Vo2
ARPO IDENTIFICATION CODE PAGE 125 OF 299
ENI S.p.A.
Agip Division REVISION
STAP-P-1-M-6130 0
From an examination of the above-written equation, it is evident that the terms Tx and x are
known as measured, and to is the two-way vertical time corresponding to x = 0. The value
Vo is determined by one of the previously mentioned methods and in particular by the 3-
Readings Method, and is introduced into the preceding equation.
Choosing a certain velocity V, corresponding to increasing values of-Tx and to pre-arranged
values of x, the equation is resolved. The result is a hyperbola, passing across the various
seismic traces; the energy values of each seismic trace crossed by the hyperbola, are
summed up algebraically. The value of the sum indicates what likelihood the given velocity
has of being correct.
To better clarify this concept, refer to Figure 3.52. The reflection times are given on the
ordinates, and the various seismic traces (CDP), as a function of x, are given on the
abscissas. In order to determine the most probable velocity corresponding, for example, to
the time Tx = 1.0:
ARPO IDENTIFICATION CODE PAGE 126 OF 299
ENI S.p.A.
Agip Division REVISION
STAP-P-1-M-6130 0
Velocity V1 is chosen as the first velocity under investigation. The hyperbola for
the velocity V1 intersects the various seismic traces at points Y1, Y2, and Y3;
those points have very low energy, and therefore their sum, too, will be
negligible. Velocity V1 is not representative.
Passing from velocity V1 to velocity V2, the hyperbola will now pass through
points Z1, Z2, and Z3, characterised by high energy, and therefore their sum will
also be high. Velocity V2, has a greater probability of being the representative
velocity.
Considering now velocity V3, the hyperbola will pass through points W 1, W 2, and
W 3 at low energy. Total energy will again be low, so there is little likelihood of
velocity V3, being the correct one.
The scanning operation can be automatically repeated for any velocity V and
corresponding to any reflection time.
If the results obtained above are plotted in a two-way time-velocity diagram,
Figure 3.53 is obtained, that is the so-called Automatic Velocity Analysis and it
constitutes the basis for all successive interpretations.
The representative velocities are the ones indicated by peaks, and the more probable are
characterised by high energy values, as indicated in the central column C in Figure 3.53.
2) Dagrams, already interpreted and supplied by geophysicists, that give average
velocities, interval velocities as a function of two-way time and/or of depth (Figure
3.54).
3) Print-outs, that give velocities as a function of two-way times corresponding to each
shotpoint of a given seismic line (Rfer to Table 3.3).
ARPO IDENTIFICATION CODE PAGE 127 OF 299
ENI S.p.A.
Agip Division REVISION
STAP-P-1-M-6130 0
Figure 3.54 - Diagram Showing Average Velocity and Interval Velocity as a Function of Depth
ARPO IDENTIFICATION CODE PAGE 130 OF 299
ENI S.p.A.
Agip Division REVISION
STAP-P-1-M-6130 0
4) Print-outs that sum up, at significant reflection times and for each shot-point. All of
the initial data (two-way times, average velocities, interval velocities, depth) necessary
for calculating pressure gradients (Refer to Table 3.4).
ARPO IDENTIFICATION CODE PAGE 131 OF 299
ENI S.p.A.
Agip Division REVISION
STAP-P-1-M-6130 0
5) Print-outs that give, at definite time intervals (generally every 0.1-0.2sec), average
interval velocities, partial and total depths. Corrected and not corrected (Refer to
Table 3.5). This form of presentation of the data is currently placed at the drilling
engineers disposal. It can certainly be considered the non-valid, since the availability
of velocity readings at well-defined and frequent time intervals (and, consequently,
depth intervals) allows adequate coverage of the whole well profile. This is not always
so with, for example, the type of data presentation indicated in point 4); since velocity
analyses are carried out in relation to significant time intervals, and therefore to
significant depth internals. The spacing between one reading and the next one at
times results excessive (even in the order of 1,000-2,000m) and therefore, insufficient
for a reliable or at least simple interpretation of the obtained curves.
ARPO IDENTIFICATION CODE PAGE 132 OF 299
ENI S.p.A.
Agip Division REVISION
STAP-P-1-M-6130 0
DIX Correction
Vel.Med Time Depth Vel.Int Vel.Int H H Vel.Med Time
m/sec sec m m/sec m/sec m m m/sec sec/ft
(1) (2) (3) (4) (5) (6) (7) (8) (9)
1,815 0.200 181.5 168
1,876 0.300 281.4 1,998 1,992 99.6 281.1 1,874 153
1,936 0.400 387.2 2,116 2,106 105.3 386.4 1,932 145
1,991 0.500 497.7 2,211 2,197 109.9 496.3 1,985 139
2,042 0.600 612.6 2,297 2,280 114.0 610.3 2,034 134
2,095 0.700 733.2 2,413 2,543 2508 125.4 2,085 128
2,151 0.800 860.4 2,543 2,508 125.4 855.3 2,138 122
2,214 0.900 996.3 2,718 2,665 133.2 988.3 2,198 114
2,291 1.000 1,145.5 2,964 2,893 144.7 1,133 2,266 105
2,369 1.100 1,302.9 3,149 3,041 152.0 1,285.1 2,336 100
2,461 1.200 1,476.6 3,473 3,308 165.4 1,450.5 2,417 92
2,585 1.300 1,667.2 3,813 3,585 179.2 1,629.7 2,507 85
2,639 1.400 1,847.3 3,601 3,460 173.0 1,802.7 2,575 68
2,713 1.500 2,034.7 3,479 3,592 179.6 1,928.3 2,643 85
2,794 1.600 2,227.2 3,849 3,688 184.4 2,166.7 2,708 83
2,866 1.700 2,436.1 4,176 3,953 197.7 2,364.4 2,762 77
2,949 1.800 2,654.1 4,360 4,111 205.6 2,570.0 2,656 74
3,023 1.900 2,871.8 4,355 4,134 206.7 2,776.7 2,923 74
3,104 2.000 3,104.0 4,643 4,366 218.3 2,995.0 2,995 70
3,195 2.100 3,354.7 5,015 4,655 232.8 3,227.8 3,074 65
3,298 2.200 3,627.8 5,461 4,992 249.6 3,477.4 3,161 61
3,396 2.300 3,905.4 5,552 5,096 254.8 3,732.1 3,245 60
3,471 2.400 4,165.2 5,196 4,888 244.4 3,976.5 3,314 62
3,551 2.500 4,438.7 5,471 5,108 255.4 4,231.9 3,386 60
3,635 2.600 4,725.5 5,739 5,320 266.0 4,497.9 3,460 57
3,699 2.700 4,993.6 5,363 5,088 254.4 4,752.3 3,520 60
3,762 2.800 5,266.8 5,463 5,181 259.1 5,011.4 3,580 59
3,827 2.900 5,549.1 5,647 5,335 266.7 5,276.1 3,640 57
3,897 3.000 5,845.5 5,927 5,556 277.8 5,555.9 3,704 55
3,960 3.100 6,136.0 5,850 5,526 276.3 5,832.2 3,763 55
4,013 3.200 6,420.8 5,656 5,404 270.2 6,102.4 3,814 56
4,054 3.300 6,689.1 5,366 5,198 259.9 6,362.3 3,856 59
4,089 3.400 6,951.3 5,244 5,111 255.6 6,617.8 3,893 60
4,119 3.500 7,208.2 5,139 5,034 251.7 6,869.5 3,925 61
4,143 3.600 7,457.4 4,963 4,910 245.5 7,115.0 3,953 62
4,167 3.700 7,708.9 5,031 4,954 247.7 7,362.7 3,980 82
4,196 3.800 7,972.4 5,269 5,156 257.8 7,620.5 4,011 59
4,228 3.900 8,244.6 5,444 5,303 285.1 7,885.6 4,044 57
4,262 4.000 8,524.0 5,588 5,424 271.2 8,156.8 4,078 56
Table 3.5 - Difinative Tme Interval Print-Outs
ARPO IDENTIFICATION CODE PAGE 133 OF 299
ENI S.p.A.
Agip Division REVISION
STAP-P-1-M-6130 0
Before continuing to the interpretation of the available seismic data, the meaning of the
values shown in Table 3.5 must be evaluated.
The basic data are reported in the first two columns on the left that indicate average velocity
in m/sec and t-way time in sec, respectively. From these pairs of values the following can be
determined:
1) The cummulative depth (column 3) by applying the simple relationship:
V i x ti Eq. 3.47
Hi =
2
Example for the first interval:
Vi = 1,815 m/sec
t1 = 0.2 sec
H1 = (1,815 x 0-2)/2 = 181.5 m
For the second interval:
V2 = 1,876m/sec
t2 = 0.3sec
H2 = (1,876 x 0.3)/2 = 281.4 m
For the last interval:
V 39 = 4262 m/sec
t39 = 4 sec
H39 = (4262 x 4)/2 = 8524 m
2) The interval velocity (column 4), obtained from the relation: :
Eq. 3.48
V i t i V i 1 t i 1
Vint .i =
t i t ii
For example, for the first interval 0 - 181.5m, the corresponding interval velocity will
be:
V1 = 1,815m/sec
t1 = 0.2sec
V0 = 1,600m/sec
to = 0
V2 = 1,876m/sec
t2 = 0.3sec
V1 = 1,815m/sec
t1 = 0.2sec
V2 = 1,876m/sec
t2 = 0.3sec
V1 = 1815m/sec
t1 = 0.2sec
V3 = 1,936m/sec
t3 = 0.4sec
V2 = 1,876m/sec
t2 = 0.3sec
V 39 = 4,262m/sec
t39 = 4sec
V 38 = 4,228m/sec
t38 = 3.9sec
V3 = 1,936m/sec
t3 = 0.4sec
V2 = 1,876m/sec
t2 = 0.3sec
V39 = 4,262m/sec
t 39 = 4sec
V38 = 4,228m/sec
t 38 = 3.9sec
The four columns on the right give the interval velocity values, depth and average
velocity recalculated with the DIX correction, that is using the root mean square
velocity (Vrms), according to the following relations:
3) Corrected interval velocity (column 5):
v i2 x t i v 2 x t i 1 Eq. 3.49
v int,i =
t i t i 1
For the first time interval 0 - 0.2 sec
V1 = 1,815m/sec
t1 = 0.2sec
V0 = 1,600m/sec (supposed)
to = 0
x (0.2 0 ) = 181.5m
1815
Hint .i =
2
And so on, for the following intervals up to the last one relating to the times 4 - 3.9:
Vint,39 = 5,424m/sec
t39 = 4sec
t38 = 3.9sec
5424 x (4 3.9 )
Hint .39 = = 271.2m
2
ARPO IDENTIFICATION CODE PAGE 137 OF 299
ENI S.p.A.
Agip Division REVISION
STAP-P-1-M-6130 0
In this way the depth corresponding to the time 0.2 sec will be:
H = Hint,1 = 181.5m
at the time 0.3 sec:
H2 `= Hint.1 + Hint.2 = 181.5 + 99.6 = 281.1m
And so on far all subsequent times.
[V ]
x (t i t i1 ) / t i
n Eq. 3.52
V c .i = int .i
i.1
So the corrected average velocity, relating to the time 0.2 sec at a depth of 181.5 m,
will be:
Vint,1 = 1,815m/sec
t1 = 0.2sec
to = 0
1815 x (0.2 0 )
V c .1 = = 1815m / sec
0 .2
The velocity V c .2 relating to the time 0.3 sec and to a depth of 281.1m, will be:
Vint,2 = 1,992m/sec
t2 = 0.3sec
0.3048 x 106
t int .1 = = 168 sec/ ft
1815
0.3048 x 106
t int .2 = = 153 sec/ ft
1992
0.3048 x 106
t int .39 = = 56 sec/ ft
5424
ARPO IDENTIFICATION CODE PAGE 139 OF 299
ENI S.p.A.
Agip Division REVISION
STAP-P-1-M-6130 0
a) in the case of non cemented formations (e.g. sand, clay, mud, etc)
In terms of interval transit-times:
t int t max Eq. 3.54
b = max 2.11
t int + t fl
In terms of interval velocities:
Vint Eq. 3.55
1
Vmax
b = max 2.11
V
1 + int
Vmax
b) In the case of cemented and compacted formations (e.g. sandstone, dolomite,
limestone etc.)
In terms of interval transit times:
t int Eq. 3.56
b = 3.28
89
in terms of interval velocities:
3425 Eq. 3.57
= 3.28
Vint
ARPO IDENTIFICATION CODE PAGE 140 OF 299
ENI S.p.A.
Agip Division REVISION
STAP-P-1-M-6130 0
where:
b = Bulk density of the formation, g/cm
3.
max = 3
Matrix density, g/cm (an average value of 2.75g/cm is usually
3
assumed).
tint = Interval transit-time obtained from analysis of the seismic date, sec/ft
tmax = Interval transit-time of the rock matrix, sec/ft (assumed between 43.5-
47sec/ft).
tfl = Interval transit time of the fluid present in the rock, sec/ft (equal to 200
sec/ft).
Vint = Interval velocity obtained from analysis of the seismic data, m/sec
Vmax = Velocity of sound in the rock matrix, m/sec (assumed between 6,485-
7,000m/sec).
Vmin = Minimum velocity of sound corresponding to the first superficial layer,
m/sec (generally around 1,500m/sec).
From a practical point of view, the geological and stratigraphical information available,
before starting drilling operations, is not always sufficient to allow the distinction between
cemented and non-cemented formations. The problem is overcome using only one of the
group of equations proposed. In fact, it can easily be observed that cemented formations
are characterised by quite high interval velocities, and consequently by low interval transit
times, that usually turn out to be between 45-60sec/ft
If those tint are introduced into the preceding equations, bulk densities that differ little from
each other are obtained. Therefore, the use of equations valid for non-cemented formations
in all situations can be justified (Eq. 3.54 and bis), even if not theoretically correct, since the
small variations in bulk density have relatively little influence on overburden gradient
calculations. An easier and more rapid calculation procedure is obtained, however, in
recompense.
In order to clarify the point above, the hypothesis to calculate the bulk density of a formation
having a very low interval transit time can be made, that is tint = 50sec/ft. If this is applied
to Eq. 3.54, it derives that:
50 47
b = 2.75 2.11 = 2.725g / cm 3
50 + 200
The difference in bulk density in the two cases turns out be 0.007g/cm3, which is practically
negligible.
The opposite case does not occur since, as already specified, cemented and compacted
formations are characterised by interval transit times rarely greater than 60sec/ft.
ARPO IDENTIFICATION CODE PAGE 141 OF 299
ENI S.p.A.
Agip Division REVISION
STAP-P-1-M-6130 0
n n Eq. 3.58
1
Pov = Pov.i =
i 1 10
(H
i 1
i x b, i)
Substituting Eq. 3.54 and Eq. 3.54 bis in Eq. 3.58. the geostatic pressure, Pov, can be
expressed directly:
In terms of interval transit-time:
Vint .1 Eq. 3.59
a
1
Vmax Hi
Pqv = max 2.11 x
i.1 Vint .1 10
1+
Vmin
In terms of interval velocity:
n
t + t max Hi Eq. 3.60
Pov = max 2.11 x int .i. x
i= t t int .i + t fl 10
ARPO IDENTIFICATION CODE PAGE 142 OF 299
ENI S.p.A.
Agip Division REVISION
STAP-P-1-M-6130 0
Calculation Example:
In order to clarify the concepts expressed above, the following calculation example is given,
using data from the velocity analyses in Table 3.5. and Eq. 3.54 and Eq. 3.54 bis, valid for
non-cemented formations.
The basic data under consideration are:
Depth (column 7)
Interval velocity (column 5)
Interval transit time (column 9).
1) H1 = 181.5m
Vint.1 = 1,815m/sec
tint,1 = 168 sec/ft.
168 47
b, i = 2.75 2.11 = 2.056g / cm 3
168 + 200
H1 x b, i 181.5 x 2.056
Pov .i = = = 37.32kg / cm 2
10 10
10 x Pov .1 10 x 37.32
G ov .1 = = = 2.056g / cm 3
H1 181.5
ARPO IDENTIFICATION CODE PAGE 143 OF 299
ENI S.p.A.
Agip Division REVISION
STAP-P-1-M-6130 0
2) H2 = 281.1m
H2 = 281.1 - 181.5 = 99.6m
Vint,2 = 1,992 m/sec
tint,2 = 153 sec/ft
153 47
b,2 = 2.75 2.11 = 2.116g / cm 3
153 + 200
n
H1 x b.i 2.116 x 99.6
Pov .2 = = 37.32 + = 58.40kg / cm 2
i =1 10 10
Pov .2 x 10 10 x 58.40
G ov .2 = = =2.078g / cm 3
H2 281.1
3) H3 = 386.4m
H3 = 386.4 - 281.1 105.3m
Vint,3 = 2106m/sec
tint,3 = 145sec/ft
145 47
b,3 = 2.75 2.11 = 2.151g / cm 3
145 + 200
n H1 x b, i 2.151 x 105.3
Pov ,3 = = 58.40 + = 81.5kg / cm 2
n =1 10 10
4) and so on, for all the following intervals up to the final depth.
The complete calculation data are collected in Table 3.6 and plotted in the diagram of
Figure 3.55. The same results will be obtained by applying Eq. 3.59 and Eq. 3.60 directly.
ARPO IDENTIFICATION CODE PAGE 144 OF 299
ENI S.p.A.
Agip Division REVISION
STAP-P-1-M-6130 0
Figure 3.55- Bulk and Overburden Gradient Curves for the Well in Table 3.6
ARPO IDENTIFICATION CODE PAGE 145 OF 299
ENI S.p.A.
Agip Division REVISION
STAP-P-1-M-6130 0
Both methods allow for not only qualitative estimations, such as, for example, determination
of the top of the overpressures and their general trend with the depth, but also quantitative
evaluations with consequent calculation of the pore pressure gradient.
These methods, as such as those following, that are based on analysis of the drilling
parameters and electrical logs, are absolutely dependent on and influenced by the criteria
of interpretation of the curves used by the drilling engineer, so that adequate experience
and sensitivity are absolutely necessary.
Generally, two cycle semilog paper is used, with depth on the ordinate and tint on the
abscissa (logarithmic scale). It is also advisable to plot the depth in such a way as to
have 1cm corresponding to 100-200m; this offers the best visualisation of the data
and an easier interpretation of the curve.
Once interval transit-times as a function of depth have been plotted, it is time to go on
to the interpretation of the curve t this point, the following considerations become
important:
As a rule, if compaction is normal and the lithology is sufficiently uniform and, above
all, characterised by a preponderance of classic formations, the interval transit times,
tint, tend to decrease with depth; consequently, the interval velocities tend to increase
with depth. This is explained by the fact that, with the increase of compaction, the
porosity of the rock and its fluid content decrease, and therefore the time required for
the sound to pass through the considered medium decreases (the propagation
velocity of the wave obviously increases).The points characterised by a progressive
and regular decrease of the values tint, with depth, can be joined by a straight line,
the normal compaction line, representing regular compaction and therefore a
hydrostatic pore pressure gradient. In other words, all the points lying on the normal
2
compaction line will have a normal pore pressure gradient equal to 1.03 kg/cm 10m.
If at a certain depth the interval transit times or the interval velocities do not decrease
or increase at the same rate, it indicates the presence of formations with greater
porosity than is considered normal for that particular depth. Speaking in terms of time,
if at a certain depth the values increase, remain constant or simply continue to
decrease, but at a lower rate than considered normal, it may indicate the presence of
impermeable formations in overpressure (for example, shales at abnormal pressure).
The presence of impermeable formations in overpressure (for example, shales
at abnormal pressure)
The presence of permeable formations at normal gradient and characterised by
high porosity and permeability (for example, thick sand beds).
If a detailed lithological description of the well exists, the two hypotheses can be
advanced and chosen between; if, on the other hand, the lithology is not sufficiently
known, the doubt remains as to what caused the increase in porosity and, therefore,
the observed increase of times. For reasons of caution and convenience, it is better to
adopt the more conservative hypothesis during programming, that is to say the
presence of formations in overpressure. This naturally does not exclude the
possibility, which must be readily accepted, that in the drilling phase formations at a
normal gradient and with high porosity might be met with.
In the absence of an accurate lithological description of the well, typical for
exploitation wells, the increase in interval transit times at a certain depth serves to
indicate with certainty only highly porous formations; whether this high porosity is due
to the presence of overpressure or to lithological variations with presence of sandy
formations, is a fact that can be established only during drilling of the hole It is
necessary, however, always to remember that even notable increases of tint do not
indicate with absolute certainty the presence of formations at abnormal pressure,
even if during planning they are considered as such.
ARPO IDENTIFICATION CODE PAGE 148 OF 299
ENI S.p.A.
Agip Division REVISION
STAP-P-1-M-6130 0
PP =POV PC
PP 10 10
GP = = (POV PC )
H H
The calculation sequence is better explained by the following example:
ARPO IDENTIFICATION CODE PAGE 149 OF 299
ENI S.p.A.
Agip Division REVISION
STAP-P-1-M-6130 0
Computation Example
1) Initial Data
Interval travel times regularly decrease with depth down to 1,629m; at this depth,
values begin to increase progressively marking the beginning of the abnormal
pressured zone.
It is therefore possible to establish that:
the pore pressure gradient is normal from surface down to 1,629m and equal to GP =
2
1.03kg/cm x10m.
ARPO IDENTIFICATION CODE PAGE 150 OF 299
ENI S.p.A.
Agip Division REVISION
STAP-P-1-M-6130 0
2
From 1,629m to 3,520m the gradient is abnormal and higher than GP = 1.03kg/cm
x10m, tending to increase with depth. To determine how the pore pressure gradient
develops as a function of depth, the equivalent depth principle, described in the next
paragraph, is followed.
It must be pointed out that the normal compaction trend line, passing through points
characterised by diminishing tint was determined by linear regression using the
computer, whereas the curve representing the development of overpressure was
obtained by polynomial regression.
Of course, the interpretation can also be done by hand; differences may exist
between the computerised and the manual interpretations, but generally such
differences do not greatly affect pressure gradient values.
where:
3
Gov,H1 = 2.245g/cm
2
Gp,H1 = 1.03kg/cm 10m
The geostatic pressure at the depth of interest, that is at 1,800m, will be:
H 2.290 = 1800
Pov .H = G ov .H x = x 412kg / cm 2
10 10
Having established that the compaction pressures at the depth of interest and at
the equivalent depth are the same, i.e.
2
Pch,1 = Pch = 174kg/cm
b) Computation of Gp at 2.000m
H = 2,000m (depth of interest)
H1 = 1,300m (equivalent depth)
Gov,H = 2.301g/cm3
G ov,H1 = 2.227g/cm
Gp,h1 = 1.03kg cm2 10m
Gp,h = 1.32kg/cm2 10m
G ov .h x H G ov .H1 G p,H1 x H1
10
G p.h =
H
10 10
10 2.301 x 2000 2.227 1.03 x 1300
= = 1.52kg / cm 2 10m
2000 10 10
Figure 3.58 -Sound Velocity and Carbonates as a Function of the Compaction Pressure
(Curves Have Been Obtained From Well Data)
ARPO IDENTIFICATION CODE PAGE 156 OF 299
ENI S.p.A.
Agip Division REVISION
STAP-P-1-M-6130 0
V int
R=
Vs
where:
Vint = interval velocity at the depth being analysed, m/sec
plot the values of R as a function of depth;
interpret the resultant diagram, using the following criteria;
If R = 1, Vint, and V5, are more or less equal, and therefore the formation
may be considered to be at normal compaction and gradient;
If R > 1, the Vint are higher than those the area is characterised by; it will
then be a case of overcompacted formations, therefore having
abnormally high velocities for their depth setting
If R < 1, the Vint are lower than the theoretical ones and high porosity
formations (thick sand bodies) or shales in overpressure will therefore be
the case.
ARPO IDENTIFICATION CODE PAGE 157 OF 299
ENI S.p.A.
Agip Division REVISION
STAP-P-1-M-6130 0
The overpressure tops will be located at the depths at which the R ratio is less
than one. Obviously, in this case also, reference must be made to the
lithological types present; when it is not possible to distinguish between sands
and shales, reference will be made to the most conservative situation.
the method allows not only the determination of the top of abnormally
pressured formations but also a quantitative evaluation of pore pressure
gradients. This result is obtained with the following procedure:
1) having determined compaction pressures for points with available Vint, values,
these pressures are plotted on the reference curve V5, versus Pc. If
overpressure is present, Vint, will be Iower than the corresponding V.
2) project Vint, parallel to the abscissa, up to intersect the reference curve at point
of compaction pressure Pc.
3) read the Pc, determined from the intercept. This new Pc is the effective
compaction pressure to which the formation is subjected:
4) read the geostatic pressure Pov, depending on the depth of Vint
5) having thus determined Pov, and the effective Pc, it is easy to obtain Pp, and
the pore gradient, Gp that selected depth.
6) repeat the operation for all depths for which the interval velocities Vint, are
available.
Example Of Computation
The following example is proposed to better explain the use of the R ratio method.
1) Initial Data Available
The data from three wells (A, B, C), previously drilled in the area, are used. These
wells are characterised by;
Essentially elastic formations
Hydrostatic pore pressure gradients
Known overburden gradient (Figure 3.59,Figure 3.60,Figure 3.61,)
Available seismic data (Vint versus H)
Well B
Well C
with
A = 1.16
B = 850
7000 x 811
Vs = + 1500 = 4670m / sec
1.16 x 811 + 850
3950
R= = 0.846
4670
The values of R, listed in the following Table 3.11, are plotted against depths as
shown in the following Figure 3.63
ARPO IDENTIFICATION CODE PAGE 164 OF 299
ENI S.p.A.
Agip Division REVISION
STAP-P-1-M-6130 0
5) V5/Vint Ratio
The interval velocities Vint of the sample well, listed at step 4, are compared at the
same depth, and therefore at the same compaction pressure, to the reference
velocity, Vs, characteristic of the zone, according to the ratio:
R = Vint/V5
Values of V5 calculated from Eq. 3.62 at the depths for which the Vint are available for
the well.
The first value of Vint in the well (Point 4) is at the depth of 80m and at Pc = 8kg/cm2
and is equal to 1,630m/sec. The theoretical V5, that should have been obtained is
given by:
7000 8
Vs = + 1500 = 1565m / sec
1.16 8 + 850
The R ratio, at the above depth will be:
Vint 1630
R= = = 1.042
Vs 1565
6) Qualitative Interpretation of R Vs H Diagram
0-3100m: R values are generally near to or greater than 1; this indicates normally
compacted or slightly overcompacted formations. Such overcompaction in the sample
well is due to the formation being in a higher position here than in the reference wells.
at 3,500m:
3
Gov = 2.31g/cm
2
Pov, = 809kg/cm
at 6,000m:
3
Gov = 2.37g/cm
2
Pov = 1,422kg/cm
at 3,500m:
2
Pp = 809 - 354 = 455kg/cm
at 6,000m:
2
Pp = 1422 - 532 = 890kg/cm
at 3,500m:
455 x 10
Gp = = 1.30kg / cm 2 x 10m
3500
at 6,000m
890 x 10
Gp = = 1.48kg / cm 2 x 10m
6000
Procedure B
This is a manual procedure, although less exact is speedier than the previous
procedure A:
On the reference curve Pc versus H the values of Vint, are plotted corresponding to
the available depth and Pc, (Figure 3.65);
2
up to Pc, = 400kg/cm (H = 3070 m), the pore pressure gradient is normal and equal
to:
2
Gp = 1.03 kg/cm x 10 m;
From the above Pc onward, the Vint are lower than the reference curve V5, and
consequently abnormal gradient formations will be present. To calculate the
pore pressure gradient in the overpressure zone, proceed as follows:
From the point, whose Gp has to be determined (point A in Figure 3.64.), draw a
parallel line to the abscissa to intersect point B on the reference curve;
Read, on abscissa, the effective compaction pressure, Pc,eff, to which the point is
subjected to have that calculated interval velocity (in this case, Pc,eff is about
2
355kg/cm );
Knowing the geostatic pressure, Pov of point A and its effective compaction
pressure Pc,eff, the pore pressure, Pp is calculated.
In the example:
2
Pov = 762kg/cm (at point A)
2
Pc.eff = 366kg/cm
2
Pp = 762 - 366 = 396kg/cm
Dividing Pp, by the depth at Point A, i.e. 3,000 m, the pore pressure gradient Gp,
is obtained:
396 x 10
Gp = = 1.20kg / cm 2 / 10m
3300
ARPO IDENTIFICATION CODE PAGE 170 OF 299
ENI S.p.A.
Agip Division REVISION
STAP-P-1-M-6130 0
4.1. INTRODUCTION
Methods of analysis based on seismic data are available before commencing with drilling
operations and are therefore very useful particularly when planning the well.
The quality of the seismic data being processed is of great importance as regards the
reliability and precision of the results obtained. Consequently, it is very useful and
recommended that forecasts made by using other methods be obtained and comparisons
made, so as to be able to appropriately modify the drilling programme in the shortest
possible time and with the least amount of difficulty.
A quite reliable and important group of methods for the determination of overpressure is the
one based on drilling parameters. With these methods, the readings regarding the drilling
operations are obtained in real time, reflect the actual well conditions that are encountered
and are recorded and processed with a minimum of time delay.
Although most of these methods do not give the actual overpressure picture, they do signal
the presence of an abnormal condition due to the presence of an abnormally behaving
zone. Such methods, therefore, give appropriate warnings that more careful and strict
monitoring must be kept on what is happening in the well and that a more accurate and
critical interpretation must be made of the methods used for obtaining a quantitative
evaluation of the pore pressure gradients.
The drilling parameters, the recording and interpretation of which only give a qualitative
evaluation of overpressure (i.e., its possible presence and the location of its top), include
the following :
Drilling rate
Torque
Overpull
Caving and hole tightening
Pump pressure and flow rate
Level in mud pits
Amount of cuttings at shale-shaker
Mud pH and resistivity
Resistivity of shales collected at shale-shaker
Amount of gas present (gas shows)
Mud temperature
Montmorillonite percentage.
Whereas the changing of just one parameter does not justify the assumption of the
presence or absence of an overpressure zone, when many parameters change in such a
way as to lead to this conclusion, the presence of an abnormally behaving zone is
considered highly probable.
ARPO IDENTIFICATION CODE PAGE 173 OF 299
ENI S.p.A.
Agip Division REVISION
STAP-P-1-M-6130 0
The recording of these parameters and the understanding of the reasons for their changing
is very important to properly interpret the methods, which give quantitative evaluations of
over-pressure, such as:
D-exp and dc-exp (respectively, drilling and corrected-drilling exponent)
Sigmalog
Shale-density measurement at surface.
The reliability of the results obtained with both the qualitative and quantitative methods has
improved considerably, by the use of appropriate sensors mounted on the rig for monitoring
and measuring the more significant and important drilling parameters and the continuous,
automatic computer processing of the obtained data, which represents a remarkable
technological advancement and which has permitted the achievement of what can be
considered satisfactorily reliable results.
With the advent of a wider application of the MWD (Measuring While Drilling) systems,
further benefits and improvements will be obtained. This system not only involves the real-
time measurement and recording of the drilling parameters at the surface, which is the more
general case today, but also the parameters down at the bit. With this system, the desired
information is obtained in its uncontaminated form that is not shielded from the multitude of
continuous interactions that occur between the drillstring and the wellbore.
PDC bits are a sort of hybrid between roller and diamond bits. Instead of the diamonds
being held in a matrix, as with the normal diamond bit, the PDC bit has button-shaped,
tungsten-carbide inserts covered with a thin layer of diamond crystals.
c) Drilling Parameters
The two parameters that most significantly affect drilling rate are : 1) the weight on the
bit, and 2):the rotary speed. The amount of weight on the bit depends on the type of
formation being drilled and. thus, the type of bit being used and its diameter.
When the formation is soft, increasing the weight on the bit increases the amount of
penetration accomplished by the cutters and, therefore the amount of rock being
removed. This continues until total penetration is reached, after which bit balling
occurs and performance is consequently reduced. With hard formations, a threshold
value has to be reached and surpassed before formation failure takes place and the
removal of cuttings begins.
Furthermore, assuming perfect cleaning under the bit, the drilling rate increases in
proportion to the rotary speed. In practice, however, increased rotary speed in hard
formations hampers the complete failure of the formation cuttings. In medium-hard
formations cuttings are simply removed while in soft formations, when bits with
adequate scraping action are provided the cuttings are immediately lifted and
removed and the drilling rate tends to remain proportional to the rotary speed.
d) Hydraulic Parameters
Hydraulic parameters contribute considerably to bit performance. Flow rates greatly
affect the removal of the cuttings and cooling of the bit. The hydraulic horsepower
used at the bit is not only a measure of how efficient the cleaning is beneath the bit,
burr, in the case of jet bits, also of the penetration rate of the bit.
There are three following behaviour characteristics:
1) With insufficient hydraulics, cleaning beneath the bit and cuttings removal are
difficult;
2) Increase in hydraulic horsepower improves penetration rate;
3) Further hydraulic horsepower increase only marginally improves performance
and would only be an unjustified expense. More importantly, reduction of bit life,
caused by abrasion due to the power increase, is an additional cost
consideration.
What the optimum hydraulic horsepower at the bit should be depends on the type of
bit, the formation and the hole diameter. It is generally defined in terms of HSI:
Hydraulic Horsepower per Square Inch.
ARPO IDENTIFICATION CODE PAGE 177 OF 299
ENI S.p.A.
Agip Division REVISION
STAP-P-1-M-6130 0
The density of the mud determines how much differential pressure exists at the
bottom of the well between the hydrostatic pressure imposed by the column of mud
(even under dynamic conditions, considering friction losses in the annulus between
the drill string and the well-bore walls) and the pressure exerted by the formation fluid.
When the pressure exerted by the mud is greater than that exerted by the formation
fluid (positive imbalance), the result is that, as porosity and permeability decrease, it
becomes more difficult for the pressures above and below the cuttings to become
equalised. The cuttings, therefore remain stuck to the bottom and are reground,
thereby reducing the drilling rate.
When the pressure imbalance is negative (mud pressure lower than formation fluid
pressure), there is an increase in drilling rate which, all other parameters being equal,
depends on the type of rock and, in particular, on its porosity and permeability. A
negative imbalance (or under-balance) is, therefore, theoretically an advantage, with
the imbalance favouring the drilling action of the bit by the explosion occurring in the
rock, immediately under the bit.
The lower the fluid viscosity, the greater the turbulence created and the better the
cuttings are removed, while at the same time. the velocity of the spurt loss of the fluid
in the formation increases The increase of spurt loss velocity precedes normal
filtration and helps the pressures to become equalised. The spurt loss velocity at a
near-zero value is one of the reasons for the drop-off in drilling rate when using oil-
based mud. If the spurt loss volume increases, the pressures are more likely to
equalise. A high solids content decreases the amount of initial filtration and, thus,
reduces the drilling rate.
When drilling is done in formations having elastic behaviour, microfractures are
created. These microfractures tend to close by molecular attraction but various types
of fluids tend to keep them open. The use of surfactants in drilling fluids facilitates the
microfiltration process and thus keeps the microfractures open making the drilling
action easier.
ARPO IDENTIFICATION CODE PAGE 178 OF 299
ENI S.p.A.
Agip Division REVISION
STAP-P-1-M-6130 0
A mathematical model developed by GD Combs; adopts the following general formula for
drilling rate:
aw
Q
aq Eq. 4.1
an
W N
R = R
1
0
x x
f (P) f (T)
200
3
3500 D h D hD n
Where:
R10 = Drilling rate with new bit P =0ft/h
R10 represents the drilling rate that would be attained with a new bit, zero differential
pressure, weight on bit W = 3,500lbs/in, rotary table speed N = 200rpm and the hydraulic
term equal to 3gpm/(hole diameter times bit-nozzle diameter, in 32ths of an inch).
The exponents and parameters appearing in this equation have been derived empirically.
Only a few of the previously discussed variables are included because according to the
author, these are the ones which most affect drilling rate. This rather complex equation
requires knowing and calculating certain coefficients, which are not always very easily
determinable. Furthermore, the equation does not provide a quantitative analysis of the
pore pressure gradient, containing a term that is a function of differential pressure. For
practical use in the field and for the inevitable approximations of the system, it is easier and
more convenient not to be concerned with certain parameters for the sake of simplicity and
ease of computation.
ARPO IDENTIFICATION CODE PAGE 180 OF 299
ENI S.p.A.
Agip Division REVISION
STAP-P-1-M-6130 0
Since both numerator and denominator are negative (the logarithm of a number less than
one), the dexp term is positive and increases as the drilling rate decreases. In other words,
all conditions being equal, the dexp becomes gretar as the depth increases. As seen
previously, the drilling rate also depends on the differential pressure which, in turn, depends
on the pore pressure and mud weight. A change in mud weight implies a change in dexp
value. With the introduction of an empirical correction in 1971, the amount of dexp change
was held to within acceptable limits. The final form of the equation, the measured parameter
being indicated as dc-exp (corrected drilling exponent) is as follows:
R Eq. 4.5
In
dc exp = 60N x GpN
12W ECD
In 6
100 D
where:
W = Weight on bit
2
Gpn = Normal pore pressure kg/cm 10m
ECD = Equivalent Circulating Density (mud density plus friction losses) kg/l
or metrically
3.21R Eq. 4.6
log
dc exp = 60N x GpN
2.64 W ECD
In
100D
The most important of the factors not considered in the dc-exp are hydraulics, rock drillability,
bit wear and the effect of high differential pressures, adequate correction of the date is
therefore hindered. Furthermore, the relationships and exponents used in the formula are
not adequate for covering all, the at times, complex situations encountered in practice,
especially when drilling deep wells. This implies making changes in the assumed dc-exp that
are not properly corrected by the above relationship.
Notwithstanding the above stated limitations, the dexp and dc-exp represent a considerable
step forward in the determination of overpressure during drilling. This method was originally
worked out for a particular zone in the United States and gave excellent qualitative and
quantitative results, especially since the interpretative criteria were originally developed for
applying the method to that particular area. When the method was used in other parts of
the world, the above mentioned limitations became more evident. One advantage of this
new method was its having marked the beginning of the use of a new methodology, which
promoted further research on the origin and evaluation of abnormal pressures.
The dc-exp calculation should begin when the drilling operations begin, and be carried out,
as a rule, every 2 to 3m (5ft). Since the calculation and plotting is usually done manually, for
high drilling rates this can be done every 5 to 10m or at even greater intervals. With the dc-
exp graphic analysis, therefore, a combined evaluation of all parameters and causes
contributing to the determination of overpressure cannot be neglected.
ARPO IDENTIFICATION CODE PAGE 183 OF 299
ENI S.p.A.
Agip Division REVISION
STAP-P-1-M-6130 0
As it can be clearly seen in Figure 4.3 which shows some examples of d c-exp evaluation, the
final result is a normalised curve which takes into consideration the changes in value that
are due to causes that are external and not attributable to changes occurring in the
differential pressure. The application of this type of interpretative criteria to the dc-exp is
however quite recent and again considers a simplified form of the shift or change in
normal compaction trend line concept which was formally introduced by Eni-Agip for the
Sigmalog. Thus the determination of overpressure tops and how overpressures develop is
reflected by a shift to the left, that is, the dc-exp value decreases as a result of the increase
in the normalised drilling rate.
In order to quantitatively evaluate the pore pressure gradients, it is necessary, at this point,
to perform an interpretation which essentially clears the curve of all the extraneous effects
attributable to external causes and in effect, normalises the curve. For example, if a bit
has teeth that are quite worn and enters a medium-to-soft formation in an overpressure
zone, the curve shift to the left will be partly masked by the decreased efficiency of the bit,
the latter representing a reduction of the drilling rate and hence, a shift of the curve to the
right. As a matter of fact, in this case, the dc-exp' takes on values that are higher than they
would be if the bit were not worn. The wear effect is not usually well-defined on the dc-exp
curve due, among other things, to the low data sampling rate. To overcome the occasional
masking of the overpressure zone, it is advisable to reduce the changes in drilling
parameters as much as possible, especially near the expected top.
As the degree of compaction increases with depth, the dc-exp values also increase,
depending on how the overburden gradient develops. Changes in depth. lithology and
geological age produce changes in the slope of the curve. The following formula gives the
mathematical relationship between pore pressures gradient and dc-exp:
(d c exp)N Eq. 4.7
PO =PN
(d c exp)P
where:
PO = Actual pore pressure at considered depth, psi
PN = Normal pore pressure
(dcexp )O = dc-exp value at considered depth
PN Eq. 4.8
(dC exp)P =(dC exp)N
PO
For known values of (dc exp )N and PN at various depths, the known value of PO can be
substituted in the expression to obtain the corresponding (dcexp )O value. By using this
formula and assuming the normalised dc-exp' line as having a constant tendency, lines can
be drawn parallel to the various pore pressure gradient reference lines (Figure 4.4).
ARPO IDENTIFICATION CODE PAGE 184 OF 299
ENI S.p.A.
Agip Division REVISION
STAP-P-1-M-6130 0
As previously noted, the slope of the reference line (which is also known as the normal
compaction trend line and is the focus of the normal pore pressure gradient points) is not
constant. Therefore, the choosing of the slope of this reference line and the positioning of it
must be done as carefully and as early as possible. Since the slope of the reference line
can change, any shifting that may be necessary to correct and reliably interpret the curve
largely depends upon the operators sensitivity and experience. For this reason, it would be
advisable and recommended that the operator avail himself of the other methods and
parameters which can help facilitate the estimate of the pore pressure gradients.
Figure 4.4 - d-exp Lines Drawn Parallel To Various Pore Pressure Gradient Reference Lines
ARPO IDENTIFICATION CODE PAGE 186 OF 299
ENI S.p.A.
Agip Division REVISION
STAP-P-1-M-6130 0
Some technicians for example, first obtain a value towards which the dc-exp curve tends in
the near surface formations and then, extrapolate this value for greater depths. Other
technicians interpret the dc-exp value for selected intervals and then modify the position and
slope of the line according to the distribution of the values obtained. Both techniques are
prone to interpretative errors of considerable errors of considerable magnitude with evident
and understandable effects on the reliability of the quantitative pore pressure gradient
forecasts. It has also been said that the dc-exp values should approximately fall on the same
straight line. This however only holds for small intervals of depth. As a matter of fact, a
mathematical error is introduced by doing this, once the dc-exp function is assumed
exponential with respect to depth, while, in fact, it close to being a logarithmic function. If
the dc-exp values however are plotted on semilogarithmic graph paper, the resulting curve
gradually approaches the vertical as depth increases. This behaviour has been widely noted
in zones having normal compaction and normal pore pressure gradients. Consequently, as
depth increases, the slope of the reference line has to be changed in accordance with the
actual distribution of the values. From these observations, it is evident that not only it is
wrong to perform an extrapolation on the basis of the noted tendency of the d c-exp curve for
the near surface formations, but also that the evaluation of the gradient values is too
subjective to give reliable results in all situations.
As it has already been seen, the difference between the dexp and the dc-exp consists
essentially in the latter being corrected for mud density,. In the broad sense, the purpose
of the correction is to take the effect of differential pressure on drilling rate into
consideration, thereby eliminating the masking of the abnormal pressure zones which
occurs when plotting only the dexp values. However, a closer look at the dc-exp equation will
show that, from a mathematical point of view, the dc-exp' value decreases as the mud density
increases and is not a function of the imbalance between the pore pressure gradient and
the mud density.
In actual practice, it is a good rule to plot both the dexp and dc-exp curves. The values to be
plotted as a function of depth should be taken from clean shale levels (although in some
cases, dirty shale or even marl could be taken into consideration) and at intervals that are
strictly dependent on the drilling rate. If a drilling control unit, complete with sensors, and a
computer is available on the site, the values can be recorded at every metre of depth, for
example. Subsequently the shale points, the points through which the reference line must
pass, will be taken into account only when the curve is to be interpreted.
As previously underlined, with formations having a normal gradient, the dexp and dc-exp do
not reach the same absolute values but increase with depth because of the increasing
compaction pressure and especially because of the differential pressure. As the zone of
transition is entered and the mud density is kept constant, the dc-exp values will gradually
decrease, thus indicting the decrease in differential pressure. In reality, however keeping
the mud density constant, while entering the overpressure zone, is such a remote possibility
that it may be disregarded. Consequently the dc-exp values corrected for mud density will
decrease with depth in the abnormal gradient/zone, whereas the d-exp values will tend to
increase or at least not diminish in the same way, according to the actual differential
pressure. The greater the shift of the actual points from the reference line, the greater the
pore pressure gradient.
ARPO IDENTIFICATION CODE PAGE 187 OF 299
ENI S.p.A.
Agip Division REVISION
STAP-P-1-M-6130 0
As a normal calculation procedure, it is still recommended to plot both the dc-exp and dexp
curves simultaneously. It is the comparison of these two curves in fact, which makes it
possible to show the following aspects of well conditions:
If the shale points on the dexp curve reveal a shift from the normal compaction
line, notwithstanding the increase in mud density, the indication is that there is a
condition of persistent imbalance and the mud density has to be increased
further until the new dexp values fall on the normal compaction line.
Notwithstanding the previously described limitation, the dc-exp curve will always
indicate the actual pore pressure gradient development and permit the gradients
to be calculated.
In conclusion it can be said that the dexp and dc-exp curves can be a valuable help in
identifying and calculating pore pressure gradients, especially where data have to be
gathered and processed manually because none of the up-to-date sophisticated equipment,
such as a drilling control unit is available.
To better understand the calculation and logic connected with the dc-exp it would be
advisable to study an actual example. As previously mentioned, the dexp curve alone does
not permit easy calculation of trends in pore pressure gradient. Therefore we need to at
least have the lithologic column of the formations, the bit runs and the mud density used.
We should also have if possible, recordings of the weight and the rotary speeds applied to
the bit. The list of data shown in the example in Figure 3.5 includes the IADC code
description of the bits, their runs and a lithologic column.
4.2.4. Sigmalog
The concept underlying the Sigmalog is the same as that underlying the dc-exp: the
obtainment of a normalised drilling rate by means of empirical drilling parameter
relationships. The term normalised refers to the maintenance of a constant relationship
value, for a particular formation, when one or more of the considered parameters (weight on
bit, rpm, drilling rate, well diameter) is changed.
It became evident that the dc-exp method was not completely satisfactory when deep drilling
was undertaken in the Po valley, where carbonatic formations involving considerable
overpressures, were encountered. The logic of Sigmalog computation and interpretation is
still evolving and attempts are still being made to find solutions for the inaccuracies and
uncertainties encountered with previous methods. The real and most important innovation is
the interpretative criterion introduced by this method which while being more difficult to
come by, at least initially, is much more versatile and dependable. The calculation can be
subdivided into two parts. One part concerns rock drillability and the other concerns the
condition of imbalance existing between the hydrostatic pressure of the drilling fluids and
the pressures of the formation fluid. The logic of the method is not strictly analytical since it
derives from empirical considerations and laws. mathematical consistency in the various
steps therefore, is not possible. The validity of the system is based on in-depth extensive
experimentation and on practical application confirmed by results obtained.
ARPO IDENTIFICATION CODE PAGE 188 OF 299
ENI S.p.A.
Agip Division REVISION
STAP-P-1-M-6130 0
As regards the d-exp. the Sigmalog begins with the determination of the drillability index,
called t :
The existing experimental and theoretical correlations concerning the various parameters,
when the bit and formation remain unchanged, should compensate for the variations in
these parameters. In practice, however. the considered experimental equations are not
generally valid. For big changes in drilling parameters (weight, rotary speed or hole
diameter), compensation is incomplete and an important change in the t value is,
sometimes, noted. In other words t , is equivalent to dexp.
It has been shown experimentally that the values of t , are extremely affected by
changes in the drilling conditions, especially at minor depth, which results in a wide range of
values. To reduce or attenuate this range of values, a correction value has been introduced,
which is tied-in with depth and which gives the following:
H Eq. 4.10
1t = t + 0.028 7
1000
At this point, this value needs to be correlate with the differential pressure existing at bottom
hole:
(
P = MW G p ) 10H Eq. 4.11
Where:
2
MW = Drilling fluid pressure gradient (or, more simply, mud weight), kg/cm .
10m (kg/l)
2
GP. = Formation fluid or pore pressure gradient (kg/cm . 10m)
H = Depth (m)
As previously noted, the drilling rate and differential pressure relationship is not a linear
one. It is affected by other factors. This has been taken into account by introducing an
experimental n coefficient and by relating it to the differential pressure in accordance with
the following law:
ARPO IDENTIFICATION CODE PAGE 190 OF 299
ENI S.p.A.
Agip Division REVISION
STAP-P-1-M-6130 0
1 1 + n 2 P 2 Eq. 4.12
F* = 1 +
nP
where:
3. 2 Eq. 4.13
n= if 1t 1
640 1t
or:
1 0. 75
Eq. 4.14
n= 4 if 1t > 1
640 1t
In fact, when calculating P, it is not the actual but unknown pore pressure gradient that is
2x
considered, but the one taken as normal (GP = 1.03kg/cm 10m). This approximation leads
to a fictitious evaluation, but permits the interpretation to be less time-consuming and more
reliable. In fact. when the actual P value is used, the changes are much more limited and
thus could make the overpressure zone difficult to recognise. The term used for the
interpretation is:
0 = F* 1t Eq. 4.15
The general interpretation criterion is the same as for the dc-exp. A shift of the 2 , value
curve indicates greater drillability and therefore overpressure. The Sigmalog interpretation is
based on the comparison of the 2 values with the previous ones, and stems from the
hypothesis that overpressure develops gradually and never suddenly, apart from rare
exceptions. A gradient increase as may be found in a porous formation, necessitates the
presence of a transition zone with low porosity and permeability where the pressure
gradient increases gradually. The thickness of the transition zone is a function of the
gradient increment, the rock porosity and permeability, and the geological time during which
the phenomenon evolved. A shift to the left, therefore, does not necessarily mean a
gradient increment.
In normal pressure situations, the reference line r will, therefore, intersect values
of 2 , (Fig 6a). In the case of overpressure, on the other hand, the reference line will
pass to the right of the 0 values (Fig. 6c). The reference line should have a changing
slope in accordance with the Gov trend (compaction trend). Since the affected intervals are
usually short and the slope can reasonably be considered constant below a certain depth,
the slope of the reference line is maintained constant at 0.088. This approximation
obviously introduces an error, but this error has been proved to be within the tolerable error
margin and is hence acceptable. This fact provides the considerable advantage of not
having to adjust the slope of the reference line according to the operators sensitivity.
ARPO IDENTIFICATION CODE PAGE 191 OF 299
ENI S.p.A.
Agip Division REVISION
STAP-P-1-M-6130 0
While drilling is taking place, the 2 have to be checked against the stratigraphy and
lithology of the well (as deduced from analysis of the cutting), so as to be able to recognise
any possible gradual shift to the left caused by gradual increase in drillability nor, ascribable
to overpressure. such as those caused by thin sandy intercalations in shales (dirty shales).
As a rule, a transition in the formation causes a sudden shift in the 2 values. These are
easily seen because the mechanical characteristics of rocks do not change gradually. To
compensate for these changes, the reference line becomes a broken line (Figure 4.6a) and
joins the higher 2 values, in the case of a normal gradient. and runs to the right in the
case of overpressures.
The shift can also be caused by significant changes in drilling parameters, well geometry,
bit type, etc. These can be categorised as formational, mechanical or external shifts. While
determining the causes of shifts may not be of prime importance, identifying significant
shifts is of extreme importance (Figure 4.6a).
For normal gradients the broken reference line goes through the main 2 values and is
thus known by definition. This is not the case, however, when overpressure conditions exist.
In practice the shifting of the line tends to normalise the 2 curve by eliminating the
discontinuities (Figure 4.6b) When gradients are higher than normal, the amount of shift
must be enough to restore the 2 , curve continuity.
Although this is not strictly correct. It does, however, make for a simpler calculation. The
various segments of the broken line r will then have the following value:
H Eq. 4.16
r = 0. 088 +b
1000
where b is the intercept on the ordinate. The following then obtained:
20 (1 F) Eq. 4.17
Gp = MW
nHF (2 F)
where:
r
F=
1t (not to be confused F with F*)
ARPO IDENTIFICATION CODE PAGE 192 OF 299
ENI S.p.A.
Agip Division REVISION
STAP-P-1-M-6130 0
o2 Eq. 4.18
r 2 = r1 x
o1
Since b (the reference line intercept value on the ordinate) is usually entered into the
computer programme, it follows that:
H Eq. 4.19
b2 = r 2 0. 088
1000
and, with a small approximation, the following can also be considered (Fig 6d):
02 Eq. 4.20
b 2 = b1 x
01
There is only a negligible difference in the values obtained by the two) methods.
The above calculations are repeated for all subsequent shifts (Figure 4.6e).
If the drilling rate is increased with the other parameters remaining unchanged (only a
change in ROP is assumed for the sake of simplicity and so that its effect on W and R
will be clearer), we would have a decrease in W . If the mud weight remained unchanged
P would also remain constant and R , would decrease as a consequence. If such
changes were to take place gradually, with the lithologic conditions remaining unchanged,
this would probably indicate an overpressure condition. If we increase the mud density, we
have an increase in P and a consequent reduction in the drilling rate in accordance with
the concepts mentioned previously. Following this, we have an increase in 1t .
Consequently, both n and F* decrease in an attempt to compensate for the effect of the
P change on drilling rates.
Let us consider the following example:
H = 2,520m
WOB = 12 t
RPM = 100
Dh = 12.25ins
ROP = 9m/h
P = 45s kg/cm
2
ARPO IDENTIFICATION CODE PAGE 193 OF 299
ENI S.p.A.
Agip Division REVISION
STAP-P-1-M-6130 0
W = 0.65
3
n = 7.8125 x 10
F* = 0.83
Let us assume an increase in mud weight, such as to obtain a P = 150kg/cm with a
2,
consequent decrease in drilling rate to ROP = 5m/h. Performing the calculations, we obtain:
W = 0.60
W = 0.73
3
n = 6.9563 x 10
F* = 0.57
If the relativity of the system is exceeded, that is, the drilling rate does not vary noticeably
with the differential pressure changes, a positive P change (overbalance) corresponds to a
decrease in F * without an opposing change in W . In this case, the Sigmalog will give
erroneous data because the Sigmalog will react to a condition of overbalance by showing a
marked shift to the left and, therefore, a theoretically greater formation drillability (Figure
4.6f).
In the equations considered so far, some parameters that can greatly affect drilling
efficiency, namely hydraulics and bit wear, do not appear. As far as hydraulics are
concerned, we can say that change in the hydraulics will affect the drilling rate in a more or
less marked manner and cause the 0 curve to shift. Then, with the hydraulic conditions
remaining unvaried, the curve will only be further affected by changes in the other
parameters mentioned previously. The same can be said as regards the changes in bit
type. Compensation can be made for this deficiency by making a shift (Figure 4.6g).
The amount of bit wear considerably affects drilling performance when the bit is designed
for soft formations. In this case, the 0 , curve shifts suddenly to the right. If the same
type of bit is used again after having tripped out the former one and the formation type
remains the same, the 0 curve will continue on with values that are congruent to those
recorded with the first bit, just before it was tripped out (Figure 4.6h).. In fact, with frequent
trips in and out (short hole intervals drilled with each bit), a considerable amount of
confusion can occur in the interpretation of the curve, especially if overpressure is present
and the operator does not have much experience. A study on bit wear is currently being
carried out. As mentioned earlier, diamond and roller bits work in quite different ways, which
makes the relationships for obtaining normalised drilling rates, when using diamond bits,
considerably different from those required for roller bits. For example, diamond bits can be
used with turbines with rotary speeds over 800rpm with very little weight on the bit (2-3t). In
this case, therefore, it can easily be seen that the Sigmalog exponential relationships are
not optimal.
ARPO IDENTIFICATION CODE PAGE 194 OF 299
ENI S.p.A.
Agip Division REVISION
STAP-P-1-M-6130 0
In practice, the use of a diamond bit in an overpressured formation causes a masking effect
(the curve shift to the left is less than when using a roller bit). This behaviour is defined by
the abnormal rpm value, when using the turbine, or by the uncorrected exponential indexes,
when the rotary drilling is used. In this case compensation depends on the operators
experience.
It should be noted, furthermore, that this system has been used effectively and with
excellent results both for making geological correlation logs and porosity logs. This
therefore has made it possible the calculation of the overburden gradient and,
consequently, of the fracture gradient, since pore pressure gradients are directly evaluated
during drilling. A final consideration must be made as regards the logic of shifts before
going into the analysis of a practical sample. That is the amount of shift has to be
determined, in order to compensate for sudden 0 changes and in order to obtain a curve
which is free of any discontinuities.
After making a preliminary interpretation by calculating the various b intercept values, it is a
good idea to check the continuity of the R curve. If any serious discontinuities result, the
b intercept values involved in the discontinuities have to be modified, so as to obtain a
series of R values having a logical distribution. To facilitate this operation, a computer
programme has been purposely designed to make a normalised curve obtainable (Figure
4.6i)
All that has been mentioned thus far refers to classic formations. In carbonatic formations,
porosity conditions do not directly correlate to actual pressure conditions. In fact, the
contrary occurs because, when there is an abnormal increase in porosity, the permeability
generally increases and the pressure status, therefore tends to remain the same. When the
carbonatic formation is compact and impermeable an overpressure condition results in a
perceptible increase in drilling rate because of the pressure imbalance between the drilling
fluid and the formation fluid. In classic formations the increase in drillability can also be
attributed to greater shale porosity. Although these are not ideal Sigmalog conditions, it is
still possible to obtain reliable results by making an accurate interpretation. A method is
currently being studied to distinguish between zones of primary porosity and secondary
porosity (induced by fracturing). The Sigmalog has a wide range of application and, as
mentioned earlier, its computational and interpretative logic is still in evolution.
This slight over pressure increase is confirmed at the first porous interval (1,600-1,700m)
where drilling breaks occur, together with slight pipe connection gas (3% max). The breaks
again occur from 1,900-1,950m with the same features. A very small re-entry of values is
noted between 2,000 and 2,100m. Equilibrium conditions are confirmed at each porous
level, with small amounts of pipe correction gas being present. Negative imbalance
conditions may occur while drilling through the porous and permeable zones but without the
intrusion any formation fluid. This probably happens because the formation fluid friction
losses through the rock are greater than the existing differential pressure. This slightly
positive, or slightly negative pressure, imbalance can be verified by carrying out a short trip
(raising the bit a few tens of metres from the bottom) so as to partially relieve the hydrostatic
pressure at bottom hole of the amount due to the friction losses and; also to have the drill
string in a safer position. By doing this, the intrusion of any small cushions of formation fluid
is facilitated. These cushions can then be circulated to the surface and the imbalance
conditions judged according to their size.
The presence of the most significant overpressure zone is at about 2,300m. This presence
persists all the way down to the bottom without any indication of it disappearing. Sudden
value shifts to the left can be observed in correspondence of sandy levels, such as at the
intervals 1,500-1,600m, 1,900-1,970m, 2,250-2,280m and 2,790-2,840m. Shifts also occur
because of change of bit type, such as at about 2,450m, where a type 1.2.4 bit was
replaced by a type 1.3.4 bit. Another shift occurs at the next run at 2,490m when the bit is
replaced by a type 5.2.7 insert bit. Shifts due solely to the change in bit diameter are not
visible on the curve. An example of bit wear can be seen between 1,500-1,560m, at the end
of a type 1.3.1 bit run. The course of the curve here, while not actually being due to a
closure, could be interpreted as such. Another point to be verified is in the 2,500-2,555m
interval. The inexperienced interpreter could identify this as a gradient reversal, but this is
not the case. This type of interval can be sub-divided into three different shifts, the first at
2,520m, the second; 2,540m the last at 2,555m. Each of these small intervals clearly shows
a gradient increase tendency: the contrary to what could be concluded from a hurried
estimation.
An example of how shifts can be calculated in this 2,500-2,555m interval is shown below:
at 2,500m:
r1 = 0. 51 01 = 0. 415 02 = 0. 44
then:
0.44
r2 = x 0.51 = 0.54
0.145
2500
b 2 = 0.54 0.088 = 0.32
1000
ARPO IDENTIFICATION CODE PAGE 198 OF 299
ENI S.p.A.
Agip Division REVISION
STAP-P-1-M-6130 0
at 2,520m:
20
r1 = 0.54 + 0.088 = 0.54 01 = 0. 44 02 = 0. 47
1000
then:
0.47
r2 = x 0.54 = 0.58
0.44
at 2,540m
20
r1 = 0. 58 + 0. 088 = 0. 58 01 = 0. 475 02 = 0. 51
1000
then:
0.51
r2 = x 0.58 = 0.62
0.475
2540
b 2 = 0. 62 0. 088 = 0. 40
1000
4.2.5. Torque
The amount of torque required during drilling can be an indication of the presence of an
abnormal pressure formation.
In undercompacted shales where the mud hydrostatic pressure is lower than the formation
fluid pressure (an underbalanced condition), the plastic behaviour of the rock will cause
hole tightening to occur. If the torque value for a given rotary speed and bit weight have
been plotted before encountering an overpressure formation, the underbalance condition is
recognisable by an increase in torque. The torque increase will be significant, if the string
stabilisers and bit are of the same size.
It must be remembered that the amount of required torque depends on the resistance met
by the bit, which is a function of the weight on the bit, the coefficient of friction of the
formation and the amount of restoring torque, the latter being dependent on the amount of
frictional force developed against the wellbore walls. Any change in the torque value can,
therefore, be due to a change in weight, a change in the type of formation or balling of the
bit. A correct evaluation of the effect of these parameters will permit a correct interpretation
of the abnormality.
If the torque values increase considerably during drilling. we have a critical situation. This
can, however, be confirmed by measuring the other drilling parameters, such as overpull,
mud flow rate, etc.
ARPO IDENTIFICATION CODE PAGE 199 OF 299
ENI S.p.A.
Agip Division REVISION
STAP-P-1-M-6130 0
4.2.6. Overpulls
When tripping out a string, the amount of hook load is approximately proportional to the
depth reached. For various causes not always imputable to the presence of an abnormal
pressure, the predicted value may be exceeded, thus causing an overpull condition. The
main causes of hook load increase can be due to the following:
a) Bit balling
b) Stuck drill string
c) Unusual swabbing effects
d) Dog-legs
e) Hole tightening.
If these above stated causes can be ruled out, the overpull may be attributed to
underbalance conditions and then to the possible presence of an overpressured zone with
consequent hole tightening.
A systematic evaluation of the quantity of cuttings present at the shale shaker makes it
possible to recognise the occurrence of new well conditions.
other hand, in the overpressure conditions, the opposite occurs with the resistivity gradually
decreasing with depth.
interrupted and cushions of gas coming from hydrocarbon bearing strata can quickly form in
the well, there is likely to be overpressure.
The gas log can be used to identifying overpressure when:
a) Recirculation of CLS in the well is avoided. which would otherwise give rise to a
gradual increase in the background gas value and which could erroneously be
interpreted as a gas cushion entering the well during a pipe connection. The
continuous use of a degaser is ,therefore,. necessary for eliminating all gas from
the previous show s from the mud.
b) No swabbing of any importance takes place during pipe and bit changes.
Swabbing would cause the formation of gas cushions not usually formed under
normal conditions, in correspondence to the mineralised level or at bottom hole.
A 350cc glass cylinder, graduated from 0 to 350, is commonly used for routine
measurements. Two solutions having different but comparable densities are poured into the
cylinder, so as to create a linear density gradient. Small disks of known density are put into
the cylinder. The Levels at which they float in the liquid will be difficult, of course. The level
values are read on the cylinder and then plotted on a graph. The line joining the points is
the calibration line and is used to determine the density of the shale cuttings, following the
above described procedure. The level The level in millimetres at which the clay sample
floats inside the cylinder is plotted and the density value is read on the ordinate, as shown
in Figure 4.12
The method is principally valid for sandy-shaly formations and is based on the principle that
fluids are poor heat conductors. It is known that overpressured shales contain a
considerable amount of water because of their being less compact and, as a consequence,
more porous. In practice, they constitute a thermal barrier which prevents the heat coming
from below from spreading upwards uniformly (Figure 4.13.) From the surface downwards,
there is a constant geothermal gradient that suddenly increases in correspondence to the
overpressure top. It has also been noted that this gradient or temperature increase already
makes itself felt at about 100m above the overpressure top. Consequently an early
prediction of the starting point of an overpressured zone is thus obtained.
In practice, mud temperatures out are plotted against depth. The resulting curve is
somewhat unusual and requires some explanation. Analysing Figure 4.14, it can be seen
that each bit trip out corresponds to a series of increasing temperature values which can be
interpolated from the curve a. At the beginning of a bit run, the circulation is restarted and
the mud, that was heated at the bottom of the well during the stop for changing the bit,
comes to the surface at a rather low temperature, having lost much of its heat to the
surrounding formations that become colder at the shallower depths. While drilling is going
on, the heat exchange decreases because the layers have taken on sufficient heat. The
mud temperature at the surface, therefore, gradually increases (curve a). Under ideal
conditions, the shape of curve a is a function of the geothermal gradient. If the gradient
remains unchanged for each bit run, curve a retains the same shape. Of course, it is also
necessary to consider the rise in temperature at the beginning of the run, since the
formation temperature increases with depth. When the geothermal gradient is constant,
curve a is a straight line and its slope is constant, too. Furthermore, if the bit run is long
enough as happens when diamond bits are used, the temperature increase becomes
minimal from a certain point onward, due to the circulating mud having reached thermal
equilibrium with the surrounding formations. In practice, we observe the drop indicated by
curve a in Figure 4.14.
If the temperature suddenly increases, as in the case of an overpressure zone, the shape of
the curve becomes as shown in Figure 4.15. The interpolated curve a, which is constant
for all sections having a normal geothermal gradient, undergoes a change and the new
trend is the one shown by curve a. This indicates that the mud out tends to reach thermal
equilibrium in a shorter span of time and reaches higher values. The trend represented by
line b in Figure 4.15 will then be valid for the normal geothermal gradient and line b will be
valid for the abnormal gradient.
This is quite a simple method, but the following conditions have to be observed during
drilling in order to obtain reliable results:
No new mud must be added to the mud in circulation.
No mud correction must be made.
The pumping must remain constant.
The circulation must not be interrupted during bit run.
The external mud course (well head-pits-well head) must be held constant.
The external temperature must not undergo sudden changes.
ARPO IDENTIFICATION CODE PAGE 208 OF 299
ENI S.p.A.
Agip Division REVISION
STAP-P-1-M-6130 0
All the above stated conditions have the express purpose of maintaining thermal equilibrium
of the mud at all times, but it is not difficult to see why actually fulfilling all of them during
drilling operations is not very likely.
(H d )
1
POV = POVi = i hi
i =1 10 i =1
where:
3
dhi = Formation bulk density as a function of depth H, (g/cm )
Hi = Interval of depth considered, m
Dividing the overburden pressure, Pov, by the depth, H. the corresponding overburden
gradient, Gov can be calculated:
POV
G OV = 10 x
Hi
In order to draw the overburden gradient curve, the formation bulk densities must first be
determined. Bulk densities are usually derived from density logs (specifically, from the FDC
log) and from other density measurement made during drilling. The FDC log. however, is
only generally available for limited intervals of a well. The cutting density measurement is
time-consuming and is affected by several limitations, such as sample preparation.
To permit the accurate calculation of overburden gradients and, consequently, valid pore-
pressure and fracture gradients, AGIP has developed methods based, as already seen, on
the processing of seismic data. on Sonic Log readings (Refer to section 5) and on the
evaluation of drilling parameters by Sigmalog analysis.
The method, which is discussed in detail later on, follows this sequence:
1) Starting from Sigmalog computations, drilling porosities in sands and shales are
estimated using appropriate formulas:
2) These porosities are then transformed into bulk densities;
3) The bulk densities are converted into overburden gradients:
4) The pore pressure and overburden gradients make the calculation of fracture
gradients possible during drilling.
To indicate overpressure, the standard Sigmalog curve is plotted versus depth. An initial
2
Gp= 1.03kg/cm x 10m is assumed. This is a valid assumption if the drilling takes place in
normal pressure zones, while the Sigmalog deviates to the left when overpressured zones
are entered. Therefore, the obtaining of drilling porosities in overpressures requires
correcting the standard Sigmalog curve both for the shifts and for the differential pressure
effect. In other words, a standard Sigmalog curve (Figure 4.16a) is transformed first, into a
Sigmalog curve normalised for shifts (Figure 4.16b) and then to take care of the possibility
of overpressure, into a Sigmalog curve normalised for both shifts and P (Figure 4.16c).
The new values are indicated with the symbol 0 and, once the appropriate shift
correction has been made for the curve and, for formations that are abnormally pressured,
the actual P acting on the formation has been considered, the values can be traced.
Obviously, for formations under normal pressure, only the shift correction is required.
In normal pressure formations, the reference trend lines, r and on the normalised
Sigmalog curve are coincident. At this point there are two alternatives possible:
1) The formations are shales and show values of normalised Sigmalog which are 0
r = .
In this case, the points lying on the reference trend line, or those having higher
values, are considered shakes and their drilling porosities are calculated by means of
the following equation:
sh [
= 1 / 1 .4 + 9 +K
r = ] Eq. 4.21
where:
sh = Drilling porosity in shales, percentage fraction
where:
sa = Drilling porosity in sands, percentage fraction
ARPO IDENTIFICATION CODE PAGE 211 OF 299
ENI S.p.A.
Agip Division REVISION
STAP-P-1-M-6130 0
In overpressured intervals, the standard Sigmalog curve has to be corrected for both
shifts and P. in order to obtain a normalised Sigmalog. The porosity reference line
(indicated as ) does not coincide with r and, also in this case. two
alternatives are possible:
The normalised o , points lying on the porosity reference line , or those
having higher values, are considered shales. Their drilling porosities are simply
calculated by entering the values in Eq. 4.21. The curve is computed,
using a polynomial regression and traced, after having selected the significant points
on the normalised Sigmalog curve corresponding to the shale points.
The points showing o values which are lower than are considered sands
and their porosities are calculated using Eq. 4.22.
t max = Matrix transit time (sec/ft) assumed equal to 47 sec/ft for shakes
POV =
H i x dbi
and G OV = 10
POV
10 Hi
To obtain correct values for the overburden gradients in the case of offshore wells. it is
necessary to consider the effect of water depth, Hm and the air-gap between the rotary table
3
and the sea level, Hag. Assuming the density of sea water as 0 = 1.03g/cm , the sea-bed
pressure is:
1.03 x Hm Eq. 4.29
Pseabed =
10
while the overburden gradient at the sea-bed is:
Pseabed x 10 Eq. 4.30
G ov =
H m + Hag
where:
Hm = Sea depth (m)
Hag = Air gap between rotary table and sea level (m)
A computer at the rig site is used to process the drilling data and present them on a plotter
and printer, to obtain the automatic computation of overburden gradient during drilling, the
conventional Sigmalog programme has to be modified. A computer code enables the
processing and plotting of the normalised Sigmalog according to the various, successive
shifts of the reference trend line which are stored in the memory of the computer. The
results are plotted as a function of depth on a 1/10,000 scale, reporting any of the following:
Standard Sigmalog
Normalised Sigmalog
Standard and normalised reference trend lines
Drilling porosity
Bulk density
Overburden gradient
Pore pressure gradient
Fracture gradient.
Figure 4.18 - Example of Pore Pressure, Overburden and Fracture Gradient Curve
ARPO IDENTIFICATION CODE PAGE 217 OF 299
ENI S.p.A.
Agip Division REVISION
STAP-P-1-M-6130 0
Figure 4.19 - Example Pore Pressure, Overburden and Fracture Gradient Curve
ARPO IDENTIFICATION CODE PAGE 218 OF 299
ENI S.p.A.
Agip Division REVISION
STAP-P-1-M-6130 0
E c = Em + EJ Eq. 5.1
where:
Ec = Total SP current generating EMF
Membrane Potential
Figure 5.4. indicates Em to be the EMF between two different electrolytes (formation water
and mud) separated by shale. The formation water may also be considered to be a salt
solution with a concentration always higher than that of the mud. It can also be assumed, as
it happens in most cases that both electrolytes are made up essentially of rhodium chloride
solutions.
Shales, as we have seen, are made up of Iayers of aluminium, silicon and oxygen atoms.
Other elements may be present as well, but the important thing is that the structure of the
shale is such that the edges of the layers hold negatively charged oxygen atoms. This
makes for a negative charged structure which will, therefore, attract and allow the flow of
positive ions (such as sodium), while repelling and preventing the flow of negative ions
(such as chloride).
ARPO IDENTIFICATION CODE PAGE 221 OF 299
ENI S.p.A.
Agip Division REVISION
STAP-P-1-M-6130 0
Shales behave as ion screens by letting sodium ions through while keeping out chloride
ones.
When a shale bed separates two sodium chloride solutions of different concentrations, the
sodium ions of both solutions may migrate through the shale, but the number of these ions
passing from one solution to the other will depend on, the number of sodium ions present in
each of the two solutions. The flow will be greater from the more highly concentrated
solution C1than it will be from the one at a lower concentration C2. As a result the contact
area between the shale and the weaker solution will become positively charged, whereas
the more concentrated solution will acquire a predominantly negative charge. A difference
in potential, or em.f. will thus exist through the shale bed, and this will be the membrane
potential, EM.
In the case considered above, only a few minutes are required for a condition of equilibrium
to be reached so that, upon opening the circuit, there will be a more consistent flow of ions.
If the circuit is closed, ion migration will resume and, with very small quantities of solution,
the concentration tends to equalise and EM will become zero only after a considerable lapse
of time. In fact, at depth, the circuit is always closed through the mud column and the
adjacent formations. However, solution volumes are quite large and the current due to ion
migration is very small (on the order of milli-amps), so it is as if no ion migration were taking
place between the two solutions and there is practically no variation in the value of EM. The
same is true for liquid-junction potential, which will be dealt with in the next paragraph.
Liquid-Junction Potential.
This potential, within permeable beds, appears at the contact between mud filtrate and
formation water. Its origin is more complicated than that of EM, but it can be briefly explained
the following way. Suppose again that formation water and mud filtrate are sodium chloride
solutions with concentrations C1 and C2 respectively, where C1 > C2. The two solutions
being now in direct contact, both sodium and chlorine ions are free to move from one
solution to the other since there is nothing separating them.
Since C1 > C2, a definite migration of both sodium and chloride ions will take place from the
more concentrated solution into the more diluted one. The sodium ion, however, is larger in
size and has more affinity for water, whereas the chlorine atom is smaller and with less
affinity for water: hence the chloride ions move faster than the sodium ions. As a result the
weaker solution becomes negatively charged whereas the other becomes positively
charged: the resultant potential different is the so-called liquid-junction potential, EJ.
This liquid-junction potential reaches a lower value than it would in the case of the
membrane potential for the same solution, because, in the former case, both sodium and
chorine atoms can migrate. EJ is only due to the excess of chloride over sodium ions and, in
practice, its value for sodium chloride solutions is found to be about one fifth that of Em
Figure 5.4. is a schematic drawing showing the upper portion of a clean sand bed, overlaid
by shale, with the borehole to the left and a small-invaded area present in the sand. EM and
EJ are shown in the form of tiny cells with polarities as said previously (CW > Cmf or RW <
Rmf). These EMFs; are responsible for the SP current i flowing into the sand through the
clay, into the bore hole and back into the sand. The resistive potential drop due to the flow
of current throughout the circuit, is equal to EC. At point P, within the mud column, at the
level of the shale bed, the potential will be positive as compared to the potential at point N,
at the level of the sand layer.
ARPO IDENTIFICATION CODE PAGE 222 OF 299
ENI S.p.A.
Agip Division REVISION
STAP-P-1-M-6130 0
Because deviations in SP are read in reference to the shale base line, they will have
negative values in the presence of permeable beds (sand).
It can be shown thermodynamically that for ideal solutions or even relatively diluted sodium
chloride solutions, EM and EJ are related to their respective concentrations by the following
equations:
Where:
Cw = Formation water concentration
Cmf = Mud filtrate concentration
K1, K2 = Coefficients (which are a function of the absolute temperature, among
other factors).
For real solutions, in place of the concentrations Cw and Cmf, one should use the chemical
activities of the solutions, aw and amf. A reference temperature, i.e. 75F (24C), could also
be assumed in order to fix the values of K1 and K2. So, in real sodium chloride solutions at
75F at any concentration, we have:
where:
aw = formation water chemical activity (at 75F)
amf = mud filtrate chemical activity (at 75F)
Eq. 5.6 is generally applicable, as long as both formation water and mud filtrate are
essentially - sodium chloride solutions, at any concentration and at 75F.
The chemical solutions activities are closely related to resistivities.
Within a wide range of values the activities of sodium chloride solutions are inversely
proportional to their resistivities so that, for practical purposes, the ratio aw/amf may be
substituted by the resistivity ratio Rmf/Rw. This provides the basis for calculating formation
water resistivity from the SP curve.
The total EMF which accounts for the SP current, and the SSP may vary with different
boreholes, due to differences in salinity in the mud and/or in the formations. In a given well,
however, there is a definite tendency for the EMFs to reach the same value for all beds for
the same type of formation and for depths of the same order of magnitude. Fresh water
sands and those with high salinity will produce low and high amplitude peaks respectively.
The peak polarity may also reverse when the salinity of the water in the sand is lower than
that of the mud.
ARPO IDENTIFICATION CODE PAGE 224 OF 299
ENI S.p.A.
Agip Division REVISION
STAP-P-1-M-6130 0
Permeable beds, having different porosities or different grain sizes, all other factors being
equal give rise to equal EMFs. The EMFs. Are also independent of permeability even when
it reaches values on the order of fractions of a millidarcy.
Figure 5.3 - Potential and Current Distribution in and Around a Permeable Bed
(Schlumberger: Log Interpretation Principles)
Figure 5.4 - SP Currents Due to Membrane Potential (Em) and Liquid Contact Potential (Ej)
ARPO IDENTIFICATION CODE PAGE 225 OF 299
ENI S.p.A.
Agip Division REVISION
STAP-P-1-M-6130 0
The curves in Figure 5.5. refer to a sequence of beds with equal or very close resistivity
values. This does not always occur in actual practice, and the resistivity of subsequent beds
can be quite different, as it is the case with shales interbedded with oil-bearing sands. In
this case the SP curve appears more rounded for the formation with higher resistivity. The
position of the points of inflection will change depending on the peaks, but they will continue
to indicate the boundaries of the beds.
An increase in hole diameter has approximately the same effect as an increase in the RJR,
ratio. This means that it tends to round off the excursions on the SP log and to lower the
peak amplitudes at the level of the beds.
In general, the permeable beds are invaded by mud filtrate. As shown in Figure 5.3. a
fraction of the SP current lines moves directly from the shale to the invaded zone without
entering the mud column. As a result, the presence of the invaded zone has an effect on
the SP curve similar to that due to an increase in the diameter of the hole. Hence the peaks
are wider than in case of no invasion.
Figure 5.5 - Comparison of SP Curves for Different Values of the Rt/Rm Ratio
(Schlumberger Log Interpretation Principle)
ARPO IDENTIFICATION CODE PAGE 227 OF 299
ENI S.p.A.
Agip Division REVISION
STAP-P-1-M-6130 0
Hard Formations
These formations usually have a high resistivity with the exception of the two following
types of conductive zones:
Permeable beds, both oil and water-bearing, which are conductive because of
capillary water (usually having high salinity) present within their pores;
Shales which are impermeable.
The permeable beds are not usually adjacent to the shale beds, but are separated from
them by compacted formations.Figure 5.6. shows a sequence of permeable and compacted
beds and shales. It shows very schematically the circulation of SP currents.
The SP currents, generated by the various EMFs, flow into the permeable zones. In order to
cross the hard adjacent formations, which have a high resistivity, these currents are forced
to penetrate deeply into the permeable bed in order to have a wide transversal section of
rock available. From here it is easier for the currents to continue their flow into the hard
formations through the large transversal section, rather than converging rapidly toward the
hole. They continue to do so until they encounter the conductive beds of impermeable shale
through which they can return to the mud in the well and, through the mud, to the
permeable bed, thereby; completing the circuit. They cannot return to the mud through
adjacent permeable beds because of the EMF that obstruct their path. If they happen to
encounter a productive permeable bed first, they will simply cross it until the shale beds are
reached: This is the case with currents entering bed P3. Those currents flowing upwards
must cross the P2 permeable bed in order to reach the shale Sh1; those flowing downwards
return to the well in part through the shale Sh6. This seems to be the reason why the
peaks, corresponding to the level of the permeable zones, broaden above and below these
zones, in such an apparently abnormal way
So as to make it impossible to accurately establish the boundaries of the permeable zones
by means of the SP log.
All along the well, at levels where hard formations are present, SP currents remain
practically unchanged. This implies that the potential drop as well is constant per unit well
length, thus generating a constant slope in the SP log as shows by the straight lines on the
log in Figure 5.6
A portion of the SP current enters or leaves the mud column, at the level of each conductive
bed thus changing the slope of the log. As an example, the curve of the SP log changes at
the level of bed P2, since a part of the current leaves the well and flows into the bed.
As a general rule for hard formations, permeable beds are characterised by changing
slopes or curvatures with the convexity facing the negative side of the log. Shales are
characterised by curvatures with the convexity toward the positive side of the log. High
resistivity formations correspond to those parts of the SP log, which are practically straight.
What said in the preceding paragraph regarding the salinity effects of the mud, it is equally
applicable in the case of hard formations.
ARPO IDENTIFICATION CODE PAGE 228 OF 299
ENI S.p.A.
Agip Division REVISION
STAP-P-1-M-6130 0
5.1.7. Factors Affecting the Shape And The Amplitude Of The SP Peaks
As shown in Figure 5.3. Currents move through the mud now just in front of the permeable
formation but also at a short distance from its boundaries.
As a result, although in the Static SP Diagram the boundaries of the permeable bed are
indicated by a sudden jump. The SP log indicates a gradual change in potential extending
along the well beyond the boundaries of the bed.
By observing the circulation of the current, it is seen that the bed boundaries are located at
the points of inflection of the SP curve. This makes it possible to determine the bed
thickness from the SP curve.
The SP log records only that portion of the drop in potential which takes place in the mud;
therefore the amplitude of the peak on the SP log approaches the Static SP amplitude (or
that of the PSP for shaly formations) only when resistance to the current flow by the bed
under examination and by the adjacent formations is negligible as compared to resistance
by the mud in the well. This result is reached when the bed is sufficiently thick.
At the level of a given bed, the amplitude of the peak recorded on the log naturally depends
on the SSP values in clean formations and on the PSP values in shaly formations. In
addition, the shape and amplitude of the peaks can be influenced by the following factors:
Bed thickness
Resistivity of the bed, of the surrounding formations and of the mud
Borehole diameter
Diameter of the zone contaminated by mud filtrate.
The SP log may also be influenced by a lack of mud homogeneity: a change in mud salinity,
at a certain level, shows up as a jump in the clay base line at that level. In actual practice
however, such changes in salinity have been found to be quite rare.
The way in which the above mentioned factors affect the SP will be explained first for
permeable formations interbedded with shales, as shown in Figure 5.3. In this case, the
resistivity of permeable beds is usually slightly higher than, or about equal to, that of
shakes. This is typical of the so-called soft formations, such as series of sands and shales.
ARPO IDENTIFICATION CODE PAGE 231 OF 299
ENI S.p.A.
Agip Division REVISION
STAP-P-1-M-6130 0
Soft Formations
a) Theoretical calculations and field experience have shown that the amplitude of
the SP excursions is practically equal to that of the static Sp (for clean sand) or
to that of the Pseudostatic SP (for shaly sand) when the permeable beds are
thick and when formation resistivities are not much higher than those of the
mud. In addition, in this case, the SP curve defines the boundaries of the bed
with a high degree of accuracy. The amplitude of the elongation is smaller than
for the Static SP or for the Pseudostatic SP in the case of thin beds, and the
thinner the bed, the smaller the excursion.
b) On the other hand, when formation resistivity R, is considerably greater than
mud resistivity R1 the SP curves are rounded, the boundaries are less
accurately defined, and other conditions being equal, the peak amplitude is
lower, magnetic field which induces a so-called 'signaI' EMF into the receiving
coil. The intensity of the current induced into the formation is proportional to its
conductivity. As a consequence, also the signal induced into the receiving coil is
proportional to the conductivity of the formation, or inversely proportional to its
resistivity. The signals are amplified, transformed into direct current and then
sent to the recording apparatus at surface.
Each coupling between transmitting and receiving coils is balanced. Within a zero
conductivity medium, as in the case of a sonde suspended in air and away from conductive
materials, the tool will give a zero reading.
In addition to the two main windings (transmitting and receiving), the apparatus is equipped
with several other coils. Main and secondary winding characteristics, their setting and
relative positions are such as to minimise the effects on the measurements of the mud
column and the formations above and below the device. Such sondes are called focusing
sondes.
Probe 6FF40 is the tool normally used. The abbreviation stands for a total of 6 windings and
a spacing of 40 between the main windings. This device also allows the simultaneous
recording of the SP curve and of the 16 normal. The device now used or the induction Log
provides an accurate and detailed recording of the formations across a wide range of
conductivitys. The accuracy is very high for conductivity values above 20mmho/m
(resistivities below 50ohm-m) and it is acceptable for lower conductivity values (down to
5mmho/m). Outside of this range the Induction Log continues to register any variations
within the formation, but the accuracy falls off.
ARPO IDENTIFICATION CODE PAGE 232 OF 299
ENI S.p.A.
Agip Division REVISION
STAP-P-1-M-6130 0
At times the invasion may completely disappear at the lower part of a highly permeable bed
with a profile such as the one shown in Figure 5.9. With no invasion, a small deflection in
the SP may be noticed; at this point filtrate and formation water are not directly in contact
with each other, but are separated by the mud cake which acts as a cationic membrane
even though its effect is smaller than it is in the case of a pure shake. It follows that there is
no liquid-junction potential, EJ, hence the total EMF is given by the shale membrane
potential, EM, and the mud cake membrane potential, EMP opposite to that of EM; hence the
reduced SP deviation.
Geometric Factor
Through use of the Induction Log, the data supplied by the instruments can be
automatically calculated, assuming the media being measured to be separated by
horizontal planes and cylindrical surfaces coaxial with the sonde centred along the
borehole. This model actually offers a very effective representation of The subsurface
distribution of shallow dipping formations. Calculations are relatively easy when mutual
electric circuit inductions within the ground (i.e. the skin effect) are negligible.
These calculations show that each medium falling within the induction Log measurement
range contributes a portion of the Signal proportional to the product of its conductivity
multiplied by a geometric factor G which depends upon the geometry of the medium.
These G factors are fractional and their total over the entire space is equal to 1.
Figure 5.11 is a sketch of a permeable bed, of resistivity Rt with an invaded zone, of
resistivity Rs, and intersected by a borehole filled with mud of resistivity Rm. Each of these
media will have its own geometric factor (a function of its geometry), Gt,Gs, Gm
respectively.
The apparent conductivity Ca, as indicated by the induction Log when the probe is placed
at the level of a permeable bed, will be:
G m + Gi + Gs + Gt = 1 Eq. 5.9
Using resistivities:
1 G G G G Eq. 5.10
= m + i + s + t
Rm Rm Ri Rs R t
In actual practice Ri may be taken to be equal to the resistivity of the displaced zone. Rx0
The apparent conductivity Ca, when the sonde is placed at the level of an impermeable bed
will be:
Ca = Cm Gm + Cs Gs + Ct Gt Eq. 5.11
In this case the term Ci Gi is missing because of the absence of an invaded zone.
ARPO IDENTIFICATION CODE PAGE 235 OF 299
ENI S.p.A.
Agip Division REVISION
STAP-P-1-M-6130 0
Figure 5.9 - SP Reduction Due to Mud Cake Effect (Schlumberger Log Interpretation Principle)
ARPO IDENTIFICATION CODE PAGE 236 OF 299
ENI S.p.A.
Agip Division REVISION
STAP-P-1-M-6130 0
Figure 5.10 - Schematic Induction Log System (Schlumberger Log Interpretation Principle)
It is obvious that the contribution due to the uncontaminated zone is higher for sonde 6FF40
than it is for sonde 6FF28. This means that the first has a larger radius of investigation, i.e.
It records values for Rt closer to reality than those recorded by the second sonde. The skin
effect does not alter sensibly the radial characteristics upon recording when compared
against those obtained by considering the geometric factor. The skin effect may also be
neglected when the following conditions are met:
Rt larger than 1 ohm/m, for a moderate invasion (Rt not to exceed 5d);
Rt larger than 2-3 ohm/m, for a rather deep invasion.
With salty mud the signal due to the hole becomes quite large especially with an off-centre
sonde. The use of Induction Logs is not recommended with mud resistivities lower than 0.2
ohm/m at bottom hole temperature except when the resistivities of the formation to be
probed are very low.
In wells with oil-base mud the corrections to be applied for eliminating the effect due to the
column of mud are usually negligible, except for the very unusual case of very huge
cavings.
In the presence of shales the conventional and the induction apparatuses should give the
same value because of the absence of a mud-filtrate invaded zone.
Figure 5.13. Shows a typical example of IES (Induction-Electrical Survey). The SP is
recorded on track 1; track 2 is the recording of resistivities as measured with the 16ins
Normal (Short Normal, SN, and Amplified Short Normal) and with the 6FF40; while on track
3 is the recording of conductivity as measured by the 6FF40.
ARPO IDENTIFICATION CODE PAGE 240 OF 299
ENI S.p.A.
Agip Division REVISION
STAP-P-1-M-6130 0
Of more recent application is the Long Spacing, Sonic Log with further improvements meant
to eliminate the influence of the borehole. A further improvement should be obtained by the
introduction of the DD-BHC (Depth Derived Borehole Compensated) Sonic Log, having
construction features likely to achieve more accurate t measurements.
FDC Apparatus
For a satisfactory measurement of the density of the formations, the instrument being used
must be in direct contact with the rock to be tested and, therefore, it must be capable of
overcoming the mud cake between the well and the formation. This is the reason why the
skid, on which source and receiver are mounted, is plough-shaped and provided with an
eccentric arm which allows the application of a force such as to favour the opening of a
crack on the wall of the hole, thus allowing a more accurate measurement. In the normal
case, it is easier to cut through the soft cakes usually encountered at shallow and medium
depths, while at higher depths the harder cake offers a higher resistance. In the latter case
the cake, or the mud left between the instrument and the formation, is considered to be part
of the formation and an erroneous density value is the result.
When the contact between skid and formation is not perfect a correction is needed and,
when a single gamma ray detector is used, it is not easy to determine the error because it
depends on the thickness, the weight and even the composition of the mud cake.
For this reason the FDC instrument is equipped with two detectors, one for short and one
for long-range measurements (Figure 5.18.).
Using the diagram in Figure 5.19 uses short and long-range measurements for obtaining
the correct value for the formation density. In the normal case the instrument automatically
provides the correction; in fact the correction curve is also normally present alongside the
apparent density curve. The distance between the face of the skid contacting the formation
and the eccentric arm provides a Calliper Log and, hence, a continuos measurement of
borehole diameter.
The log is as shown in Figure 5.22. The FDC curve is recorded on tracks 2 and 3 with
density values given in g/cm; the correction curve (showing the compensation for the cake
and the irregularities of the hole) is recorded on track 3.
The Calliper instead, is recorded on track 1 (sometimes simultaneously with the Gamma
Ray curve) and it turns out to be very important to establish those points where density
readings are not correct.
ARPO IDENTIFICATION CODE PAGE 247 OF 299
ENI S.p.A.
Agip Division REVISION
STAP-P-1-M-6130 0
Where:
t = Transit time of sound through the formation (sec/ft)
tmax = Transit time of sound through the solid frame (sec/ft)
tn = Transit time of sound the pore fluid (sec/ft)
Eq. 5.14 may be expressed in terms of porosity:
t t max
=
t n t max
Where:
tn = Is assumed to have a value of 200sec/ft (a conservative value for pore
pressure gradient calculations)
tmax = Values are assumed to be those in Table 5.1.
tmax
Solid Frame
(sec/ft)
Dolomite 43.5
Limestone 43.5 47.5
Anhydrite 50.0
Gypsum 66.7
Various Grain Types 47.6 55.6
Shale 47.0 (ass.)
Table 5.1 - Transit Times Through Solid Frame
Wyllies equation also equals zero in the case of compacted limestones and dolomites,
where no secondary porosity is present.
In the case of uncemented or under-compacted formations, the preceding relationship no
longer holds when determining the primary porosity of the formation. In fact, the values are
higher than those obtained in the subsurface. .
Eni-Agip, after a series of laboratory tests on rock cores determined the following
relationships to be valid:
t t max Eq. 5.15
= 1.228 for sands
t + 200
t t max Eq. 5.16
= 1.268 for shales
t + 200
The above relationships have been confirmed during actual drilling. In fact, density values
deter-mined by the FDC and total density values calculated from the relationship shown
above have been found to correspond very closely.
ARPO IDENTIFICATION CODE PAGE 252 OF 299
ENI S.p.A.
Agip Division REVISION
STAP-P-1-M-6130 0
This represents the pressure change between the two surfaces at different depths.
In the above-mentioned interval a constant value far density can be assumed, and a certain
volume for the rock formation can be defined.
Eq. 5.17 may therefore be written in the following way:
Where
b = Total density
max = Density of the solid frame
fl = Density of the pore fluid
Vb = Total volume
Vmax = Volume of the solid frame
Vfl = Volume occupied by the pore fluid
When Eq. 5.18 is solved for b the result is:
Vmax V Eq. 5.19
b = max + n n
Vb Vb
The volume Vb is connected to Vmax and Vfl by the following relationship:
and by defining:
Vfl
= if SW = 100%
Vb
It should be noted that 2.75 (g/cm ) is the value assumed for max and 1.03(g/cm ) for fl.
3 3
Eq. 5.23 and Eq. 5.24 give approximately equal values for low transit times (t between 40
and 60sec/ft) and therefore for high velocities (Figure 5.23. -Figure 5.24.); for high t
values, instead, they are quite different.
In order to check these relationships, density values obtained through Eq. 5.23 and Eq.
5.24 were compared with those values obtained from the FDC, which gives bulk density
values as a function of depth.
In the cases examined, referring to different areas around the World and different
formations, it was noted that the values given by Eq. 5.23, which were assumed to hold for
uncemented formations, are actually close to FDC density values under all conditions.
Figure 5.25 - Figure 5.32show the FDC density values (dashed line) and those obtained by
Eq. 5.24 (dotted line) as a function of depth.
In particular for Figure 5.29 and Figure 5.30., both the values obtained from Eq. 5.23 (dots)
and those obtained from Eq. 5.24 (dashes) were reported. In the first case the two
relationships give results which are quite similar, because of the presence of Limestones
(low t values). In the second case, with altering sands and shales, the values are
noticeably dissimilar and it can be noted that the values from Eq. 5.24 match quite faithfully
the average density values from the FDC.
In conclusion it can be said that for calculation ease, Eq. 5.24 may be applied to all types of
formations in order to avoid distinguishing between cemented and uncemented formations,
which is sometimes difficult.
Table 5.2 gives a list of the most common values for max:
Figure 5.25 - Comparison Between Bulk Densities from FDC and Sl (Central PO Valley)
ARPO IDENTIFICATION CODE PAGE 258 OF 299
ENI S.p.A.
Agip Division REVISION
STAP-P-1-M-6130 0
Figure 5.28 - Comparison Between Bulk Densities from FDC and SL (Indonesia Offshore)
ARPO IDENTIFICATION CODE PAGE 261 OF 299
ENI S.p.A.
Agip Division REVISION
STAP-P-1-M-6130 0
Figure 5.29 - Comparison Between Bulk Densities from FDC and SL (Mauritania Onshore)
ARPO IDENTIFICATION CODE PAGE 262 OF 299
ENI S.p.A.
Agip Division REVISION
STAP-P-1-M-6130 0
Figure 5.30 - Comparison Between Bulk Density from FDC and Sl (Nile Delta-Egypt)
ARPO IDENTIFICATION CODE PAGE 263 OF 299
ENI S.p.A.
Agip Division REVISION
STAP-P-1-M-6130 0
Figure 5.31 - Comparison Between Bulk Densities from FDC and SL (Adriatic Offshore)
ARPO IDENTIFICATION CODE PAGE 264 OF 299
ENI S.p.A.
Agip Division REVISION
STAP-P-1-M-6130 0
Figure 5.32 - Comparison Between Bulk Densities from FDC and SL (Adriatic Offshore)
ARPO IDENTIFICATION CODE PAGE 265 OF 299
ENI S.p.A.
Agip Division REVISION
STAP-P-1-M-6130 0
From this relationship, the overburden gradient can be obtained by distributing the resulting
pressure value over the whole interval H, so that:
G OV =
P OVi
=
POV
x 10
Eq. 5.27
H i H
For a correct evaluation of the At corresponding to a given Hi, the following procedure is
suggested:
1) The number of milliseconds elapsed for the sound wave to cross the formation interval
having thickness AH is read (this is done by counting the ITT pips on the SL to the
left.
2) This value is multiplied by 1,000 to change milliseconds into microseconds, and is
divided by the value of AH; in order to obtain the values of At, measured in sec/ft, H
must be changed from meters to ft by dividing by 3.28.
3) The final expression takes the form:
K x 1000 Eq. 5.28
t =
3.28 x H
where:
K = Milliseconds required far passing through a section of formation of
height H.
This value for t represents the average transit time in the interval H.
ARPO IDENTIFICATION CODE PAGE 266 OF 299
ENI S.p.A.
Agip Division REVISION
STAP-P-1-M-6130 0
Sample Calculation
The following example refers to a well in which the SL recording started at 279m and ended
at 1,500m.
1) In the interval 279-307m; the readings are:
K = 7
H = 28m
so that by applying Eq. 5.28, the following value is obtained:
7 x 1,000
t = = 76.2 sec/ ft
3.28 x 28
SL recordings (and even more so, FDC recordings) almost always start at a given depth.
For this reason it is necessary to extrapolate the values up to the surface. The procedure is
as follows:
2
for on-shore wells the surface Gov value may vary between 1.9 and 1.95 g/cm
10m (depending on the area being investigated)
for off-shore wells, given that the depths read from the logs refer to the Rotary
Table level, the air gap (height of rotary table-sea level) and sea depth have to
be taken into account.
3
If a density value of 1.03 g/cm is assumed for sea water, the pressure on the sea
floor is calculated:
P =
1.03 x Hm
10
(
kg / cm 2 ) Eq. 5.29
Where:
Hm = Water depth, m
So that the Gov value on the sea floor is given by:
10P Eq. 5.30
GOV =
Hm + H1
Where:
H1 = Ar gap, m
2) in the interval 307-327m:
K = 4
H = 20m
4 x 1000
t = = 61 sec/ ft
3.28 x 20
3) and so on, as given below:
ARPO IDENTIFICATION CODE PAGE 267 OF 299
ENI S.p.A.
Agip Division REVISION
STAP-P-1-M-6130 0
H(m) t(sec/ft)
279-307 76.2
307-327 61
327-344 53.8
344-354 61
354-375 58
375-397 55.4
397-420 52
420-461 52.7
461-487 59
487-510 53
510-636 51
636-710 62
710-777 54.6
777-815 56.2
815-925 56.6
925-1,275 52.3
1,275-1,500 53
Table 5.3 - Example Calculation
The transit times are then changed to b, Pov and Gov, as shown in Table 5.4 and in Figure
5.33.
ARPO IDENTIFICATION CODE PAGE 268 OF 299
ENI S.p.A.
Agip Division REVISION
STAP-P-1-M-6130 0
Figure 5.33- Comparison Between Gov from SL and FDC (In Carbonates PO Valley Basin)
ARPO IDENTIFICATION CODE PAGE 269 OF 299
ENI S.p.A.
Agip Division REVISION
STAP-P-1-M-6130 0
H t b Pov Gov
400.0 465.0 52.0 2.71 112.90 2.43
465.0 485.0 60.0 2.65 118.21 2.44
485.0 640.0 52.0 2.71 160.34 2.51
640.0 690.0 61.0 2.65 173.59 2.52
690.0 710.0 66.0 2.61 178.81 2.52
710.0 775.0 55.0 2.69 196.33 2.53
775.0 805.0 57.0 2.67 204.37 2.54
805.0 900.0 53.0 2.71 230.11 2.56
900.0 975.0 52.0 2.71 250.50 2.57
975.0 1,050.0 54.0 2.70 270.77 2.58
1,050.0 1,200.0 51.0 2.72 311.66 2.60
1,200.0 1,300.0 52.0 2.71 338.84 2.61
1,300.0 1,400.0 54.0 2.70 365.86 2.61
1,400.0 1,500.0 53.0 2.71 392.92 2.62
1,500.0 1,550.0 52.0 2.71 406.55 2.62
1,550.0 1,600.0 53.0 2.71 420.10 2.63
1,600.0 1,700.0 52.0 2.71 447.28 2.63
1,700.0 1,850.0 53.0 2.71 487.94 2.64
1,850.0 1,925.0 52.0 2.71 508.32 2.64
1,925.0 2,015.0 51.0 2.72 532.85 2.64
2,015.0 2,150.0 46.0 2.76 570.20 2.65
2,150.0 2,225.0 47.0 2.75 590.89 2.66
2,225.0 2,250.0 50.0 2.73 597.72 2.66
2,250.0 2,410.0 54.0 2.70 640.96 2.66
2,410.0 2,450.0 47.0 2.75 651.99 2.66
2,450.0 2,495.0 52.0 2.71 664.22 2.66
2,530.0 2,537.0 52.0 2.71 675.81 2.66
2,537.0 2,590.0 50.0 2.73 690.30 2.67
2,590.0 2,750.0 54.0 2.70 733.54 2.67
2,750.0 2,800.0 47.0 2.75 747.53 2.67
2,800.0 2,900.0 52.0 2.71 774.53 2.67
2,900.0 3,150.0 60.0 2.65 840.93 2.67
3,150.0 3,400.0 44.0 2.78 910.50 2.68
3,400.0 3,550.0 44.0 2.78 952.25 2.68
Table 5.4 - Gov Calculations from Sonic Log
ARPO IDENTIFICATION CODE PAGE 270 OF 299
ENI S.p.A.
Agip Division REVISION
STAP-P-1-M-6130 0
Once the Pov value has been calculated using Eq. 5.31, it is necessary only to divide it by
H=Hi in order to obtain Gov.
POV 10
(Hi bi )/ 10
10
G OV = 10
H
=
H
Povi =
H
Eq. 5.32
where:
b = Sediment bulk density (g/cm3) as read from the FDC
Hi = Depth interval for the formation having the same b value
2
Gov = Overburden gradient, kg/cm *10m
H = (Hi) Depth for which Gov is calculated, m
The procedure for calculating Gov is as follows:
1) Plot the density readings as a function of depth onto graph paper. The density value
obtained for each depth interval is an average density value for that interval.
The choice has to be made with a degree of accuracy as to minimise the effect of the
corrections made.
When reading the total density particular attention must be paid to the Calliper which
is recorded on track 1 of the log. This makes it possible to determine the reliability of
the density value; in fact, a variation in the bore diameter from its nominal value could
increase the effect of the mud on the value of Qb, thus introducing false values into
the calculation of the overburden gradient.
A line is thus obtained through which a continuous curve can be drawn.
2) Integration is then carried out as follows: in the equation, which gives the integrated
sediment density, the summation is replaced with the integral and Simpsons rule is
applied.
3) Choose an interval Hi - Hi-1 , = H; and divide it into an equal number of parts ( n = 4).
4) Calculate the value of GOV, over the first interval with the equation:
10 H
(H) dH = ( b1 + b 2 + b 3 + b 4 + b5 )
10 Hi Eq.
G OV1 =
H H0
H1 4 x 3 x 10
5.33
ARPO IDENTIFICATION CODE PAGE 271 OF 299
ENI S.p.A.
Agip Division REVISION
STAP-P-1-M-6130 0
Where:
b,1 = (H0) Is the density as read at a depth H = H0
H
b 2 = H0 +
4
2 H
b 3 = H0 +
4
3H
b 4 = H0 + up to b5 = (H1)
4
5) Once the pressure value Pov1 and the integrated density Gov1 for depth H1, have been
calculated, the pressure increase Pov2 for the next interval H2 H1 = H2 is
calculated, so that for depth H2:
POV 2 = POV1 + POV 2
G OV 2 =
10 POV 2 (P + POV 2 )
= 10 OV1
H2 H2
and so on.
ARPO IDENTIFICATION CODE PAGE 272 OF 299
ENI S.p.A.
Agip Division REVISION
STAP-P-1-M-6130 0
Sample calculation
Let us assume the following FDC log readings to be available:
H(m) b(g/cm3)
279-300 2.62
300-307 2.47
307-325 2.57
325-350 2.63
350-395 2.62
395-405 2.60
405-475 2.63
475-628 2.65
628-710 2.55
710-725 2.62
725-835 2.65
835-860 2.62
860-1,000 2.65
1,000-1,050 2.63
1,050-1,175 2.62
1,175-1,200 2.63
1,200-1,250 2.64
1,250-1,300 2.63
1,300-1,350 2.65
1,350-1,375 2.66
1,375-1,400 2.64
1,400-1,450 2.63
1,450-1,500 2.64
Table 5.5 - Example FDC Data
These values have been plotted in Figure 5.34 and a broken line has thus been obtained
through which a continuos curve has been grown.
H
By choosing H = 200 and n = 4, a value of = 50m is thus set for each individual
4
interval.
In this way the density values on the continuous curve have been read every 50m.
Integration was then carried out according to the procedure just explained and the results
are shown in Table 5.6:
ARPO IDENTIFICATION CODE PAGE 273 OF 299
ENI S.p.A.
Agip Division REVISION
STAP-P-1-M-6130 0
Figure 5.34 - Bulk Density and Overburden Gradient Calculation (from FDC)
ARPO IDENTIFICATION CODE PAGE 274 OF 299
ENI S.p.A.
Agip Division REVISION
STAP-P-1-M-6130 0
The density values could have also been read at the selected depths (every 50m) on the
broken line rather than the curve.
This procedure would not have changed the resulting Gov values substantially.
ARPO IDENTIFICATION CODE PAGE 275 OF 299
ENI S.p.A.
Agip Division REVISION
STAP-P-1-M-6130 0
Semiconductors include those metals in which conduction still occurs through the flow
of electrons but in which the conductivity value is lower than in the case of pure
metals.
The majority of the most common minerals within the lithosphere belongs to the
insulator group with resistivities on the order of 10 10
-6 -14
ohm. m at room
temperature. The flow of current takes place by means of ions, mostly metallic cations
which, because of the smaller ionic radius, move more easily within the crystal lattice.
a) Resistivity of Subsurface Fluids
In additions to the minerals, there are also fluids present in porous rocks.
In most cases, these fluids are made up of water with some salt content; in some
cases, liquid or gaseous hydrocarbons are present.
While hydrocarbons, gases and air have very high resistivity values, highly saline
water may be very conductive thereby affecting the resistivity of the rocks in which it is
present. It is the presence of ions that makes water a conductor and its conductivity is
a function of their concentration and mobility. Furthermore, it is also a function of
temperature. Chlorides (NaCl being extremely common), carbonates and sulphates
are most common salts in subsurface waters.
ARPO IDENTIFICATION CODE PAGE 276 OF 299
ENI S.p.A.
Agip Division REVISION
STAP-P-1-M-6130 0
The resistivity of rock depends on the resistivity of the minerals present and their
texture but, most of all on the presence (or absence) of water within pores or
fractures.
Consider the case or porous or fractured rocks with water present and let us
differentiate between rocks with quite wide pore sizes and clays, with such small pore
sizes that the movement of the water present in hindered.
The first group includes the water-saturated porous-permeable rocks.
As a rule, except for some sealed voids which are typical of some rocks, the various
rock pores make up a continuous system filled with material which is definitely more
conductive than the rock-forming materials. These materials, therefore, do not
contribute anything towards the flow of electricity which is in fact due essentially to the
water.
It has been proved experimentally that when a sample of rock is filled with a sequence
of waters having different resistivity values R,, the resistivity of the rock will vary in
such a way that the ratio of its resistivity to that of the water remains constant:
R Eq. 5.35
F=
Rw
The constant F called the Formation Factor, is a unique characteristic of each type of
rock; it makes it possible to calculate the rock resistivity once the resistivity of the
absorbed water is known. It has been proved that the F factor is inversely
proportional to porosity. On the basis of experimental tests, it was been observed that
this relationship can be expressed by an equation such as Archies Law:
F=a x
m Eq. 5.36
Where:
= Porosity
a = Constant
m = Cementation factor, related to the intricate nature of the channels and
to the variations in their cross-section.
Let us now examine a rock made up of clay minerals. Even though these rock are
very porous, because of the very fine grain of the minerals, they have a very low
permeability and very high surface activity.
Experiments carried out on shale samples have given results which do not concur with
Archies Law. The disagreement in the resistivity values is due to the likelihood of
interchange between the cations present in the absorbed water and those absorbed
on the surface of the clay minerals.
ARPO IDENTIFICATION CODE PAGE 277 OF 299
ENI S.p.A.
Agip Division REVISION
STAP-P-1-M-6130 0
Therefore, when shale is impregnated with water at low salinity, a portion of the
absorbed cations will migrate into the water which as a result becomes more
conductive. On the contrary, when water is highly saline, part of the cations will be
adsorbed by the shale and, because of the lower mobility of the adsorbed ions, the
shale shows a higher resistance than would be expected when Eq. 5.35 is applied.
If the actual value of Rw could be measured, this would make Eq. 5.35 applicable and
would make subsequent evaluation of porosity possible.
When the Fsh method is introduced later on, the procedure for calculating the actual
Rw will be looked at.
* Schlumberger SP-2 A-12 diagram which makes the evaluation of Rw possible once (Rw)e
is known (Figure 5.35)
In the case of salt-water mud or mud containing gypsum, the diagram makes the evaluation
of Rw (possible beginning with (R), at formation temperature.
Before describing the procedure for calculating the R, curve, the quantities (Rmf)e and (Rw)e
presented above need to be made clear. As we have seen in the chapter on logs, the SSP
far a clean sand formation is related to the activity of the filtrate and that of the formation
water by the following expression:
aw R Eq. 5.38
PSS = K log = K log mf
a mf Rw
ARPO IDENTIFICATION CODE PAGE 278 OF 299
ENI S.p.A.
Agip Division REVISION
STAP-P-1-M-6130 0
In NaCI solutions, which are not too highly concentrated, the activity is, in fact, inversely
proportional to the resistivity of the solution.
For higher NaCI concentrations or other kinds of solutions, the linear relationship between
resistivity and activity for the solution does no longer hold ; in order to maintain the linearity,
the quantities (Rmf)e and (Rw)e are introduced; the SSP is then given by:
(Rmf )e Eq. 5.39
PSS = K Log
(R w )e
By following the procedure just described, the sampling of formation water which is
necessary to measure resistivity is by-passed and under favourable conditions. The K,
curve obtained is quite reliable.
For the other layers, the excursion amplitudes as measured from the shale base line are
usually less than the difference between the readings at the sand base line and those taken
at the shale line, i.e. of the SSP. This may be due to the effect of geometrical distribution of
the media along the path of the SP current, i.e. effects of layer thickness, of the well, of the
invasion, etc.
The reduced excursion amplitude may also result from the presence of appreciable
amounts of interstitial shale in the sands.
Laboratory experiments, using a resistive network, have been made, in order to establish
the effect of geometric distribution and resistivity of the media on the SP and also with the
objective of evaluating the corrections due to such factors. As an example, Figure 5.37
shows some data for a formation with a thickness of e = 10 d (i.e., ten times the diameter of
the well), with invasion diameter Di = 2.05 d, and Rs = Rm.
It seems necessary that all these factors be known in order to arrive at the correct value for
the ratio between SP and the SSP.
It can be expected, at least in the most favourable instances, that these factors will be
determined through the application of resistivity measurement methods. In the meantime
approximated corrections can be made by using simplified empirical charts.
ARPO IDENTIFICATION CODE PAGE 279 OF 299
ENI S.p.A.
Agip Division REVISION
STAP-P-1-M-6130 0
Figure 5.37 - SP Curves Departure and Relevant Parameters (for a 10d thickness layer)
ARPO IDENTIFICATION CODE PAGE 283 OF 299
ENI S.p.A.
Agip Division REVISION
STAP-P-1-M-6130 0
Evaluation of (Rw)e,
Knowing the ratios (Rmf)e,/(Rw)e may be calculated for each point being considered.
Evaluation of RW
Once (Rw)e has been found Rw is obtained at the various formation temperatures by using
the SP-2 A-12 diagram.
ARPO IDENTIFICATION CODE PAGE 284 OF 299
ENI S.p.A.
Agip Division REVISION
STAP-P-1-M-6130 0
Evaluation of Fsh
Now that the Rw and Csh values are available, the value of Fsh can be calculated as defined
in Eq. 5.37.
ARPO IDENTIFICATION CODE PAGE 285 OF 299
ENI S.p.A.
Agip Division REVISION
STAP-P-1-M-6130 0
According to this principle, under homogeneous lithological conditions, formations which are
characterised by the same Fsh value will have the same porosity and, therefore, will be
subject to the same compaction pressure, even if they are located at different depths.
Therefore, once the geostatic pressure has been calculated at a given depth, the formation
pressure, and hence the pore pressure gradient, can be determined by a simple
subtraction.
In order to clarify what has been described above, sample calculation is presented in the
following paragraph.
Fsh as defined above when pores are saturated, is a function of shale porosity and thus of
the compaction pressure of the formation at a fixed depth. Its measurement makes it
possible to distinguish between the normally compacted subsurface zones, i.e. with
hydrostatic gradient, and those which are undercompacted and thus to recognise those
formations with abnormal pore pressures and gradients
In fact, rock resistivity varies with salt content; in normally compacted formations, salinity in-
creases with depth, as does the resistivity of the shale with a consequent decrease in shale
porosity.
ARPO IDENTIFICATION CODE PAGE 286 OF 299
ENI S.p.A.
Agip Division REVISION
STAP-P-1-M-6130 0
The opposite occurs in the case of undercompacted zones where resistivity increases with
a consequent increase in porosity.
The procedure for calculating Fsh is very tedious and complex because of the practical
impossibility of extracting shale samples for measuring R, from depth; the application of this
method is, therefore, limited to those particular lithologies made up of sand and shale
interbeddings for which an Rw vs depth curve can be drawn
The values from Table 5.5 are plotted in Figure 5.41 on a semilogarithmic scale as a
function of depth.
Table 5.6. Shows the values of Fsh as calculated on the basis of Rw obtained from Figure
5.41, and Csh (shale conductivity) read directly from the log.
The Fsh values obtained are then plotted as shown in Figure 5.42. This figure also gives the
calculation of pore pressure gradients at two significant depths, 4,700m and 5,000m. An
examination of the curve reveals increasing Fsh values down to a depth of 4,100m, where
the overpressure top may be located; this indicates that formations down to 4,100m are
normally compacted and, therefore, also normally pressurised. From this point, the gradient
increases rapidly (rapidly decreasing Fsh values) so that at 4,700m Gp has already reached
2
a value of 1.63kg/cm 10m; below 4,700m, Fsh values increase again, but still show
overpressure conditions even though the gradient is decreasing (in fact at 5,000m, Gp =
2
1.53kg/cm 10 m). The same calculation procedure can be applied to any other point on the
curve. It is usually suggested, unless a computer is available to take readings every 100m
and, eventually, to increase the number of readings along the most important intervals of
the curve.
For clean shales under conditions of normal compaction, i.e. with a hydrostatic pore
gradient, transit times tsh should decrease with depth as a consequence of the lower shale
porosity; in conditions of undercompaction however, transit times will increase with depth.
In conclusion, the tsh method permits a precise measurement of the conditions of the
formations crossed, which will be much more accurate if the assumptions made above are
verified.
Depth Temp Temp SSP Rmf At (Rmf)e (Rmt)e/ (Rw)e Rw
m. C F Temp. F (Rw)e
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9
1,100 33 90 44 0.41 0.35 4.2 0.083 0.1
1,150 35 95 43 0.39 0.33 3.9 0.084 0.097
1,295 38 100 43 0.37 0.32 3.85 0.083 0.096
1,420 40 104 43 0.36 0.31 3.8 0.0815 0.095
1,600 42 107 46 0.35 0.3 4.1 0.073 0.086
1,735 44 110 49 0.34 0.29 4.5 0.064 0.076
1,845 45 113 56 0.33 0.28 5.6 0.05 0.064
1,980 48 118 55 0.32 0.27 5.3 0.051 0.065
2,160 51 123 51 0.30 0.26 4.5 0.058 0.07
2,300 53 127 58 0.295 0.25 5.6 0.045 0.058
2,360 54 130 57 0.29 0.25 5.4 0.046 0.059
2,535 56 132 59 0.285 0.24 5.8 0.041 0.055
2,610 58 135 62 0.28 0.24 6 0.04 0.052
2,650 59 138 62 0.275 0.23 6 0.038 0.051
2,725 60 140 59 0.27 0.23 5.7 0.04 0.052
2,810 62 143 58 0.265 0.22 5.6 0.039 0.051
3,085 65 148 55 0.25 0.21 5.8 0.036 0.048
3,250 67 152 60 0.245 0.21 5.5 0.038 0.049
3,310 68 155 65 0.24 0.20 6.3 0.032 0.042
3,650 71 159 79 0.235 0.20 8.7 0.23 0.036
3,705 74 166 70 0.22 0.19 7 0.27 0.038
4,350 86 188 40 0.098 0.083 2.9 0.287 0.046
4,650 88 192 34 0.14 0.119 2.5 0.048 0.052
4,885 93 200 30 0.135 0.115 2.2 0.052 0.054
5,100 101 214 20 0.11 0.0935 1.65 0.067 0.068
N.B.: up to 2,270m has been used Rmf = 0.528 at 20C from IES
up to 3,190m has been used Rmf = 0.500 at 16C from IES
up to 3,770m has been used Rmf = 0.520 at 18C from IES
up to 4,500m has been used Rmf = 0.290 at 15C from IES
up to 4,915m has been used Rmf = 0.382 at 19C from IES
Table 5.7 - IES Log Data
ARPO IDENTIFICATION CODE PAGE 292 OF 299
ENI S.p.A.
Agip Division REVISION
STAP-P-1-M-6130 0
Depth Csh (Rw) Csh. Rw Fsh Depth Csh (Rw) Csh. Rw Fsh
m. Calc Csh Rw m. Calc Csh Rw
1,015 580 0.12 69.6 0.014 3,760 290 0.040 11.6 0.086
1,167 550 0.1 55 0.018 3,800 240 0.040 9.6 0.104
1,227 500 0.097 53.4 0.019 3,820 250 0.040 10.0 0.100
1,260 550 0.096 52.8 0.019 3,840 320 0.040 11.2 0.089
1,430 670 0.087 58.3 0.017 3,920 220 0.0405 8.9 0.112
1,513 490 0.083 40.7 0.025 3,970 210 0.041 8.6 0.116
1,532 600 0.082 49.2 0.02 3,990 200 0.041 8.2 0.122
1,558 400 0.081 32.4 0.031 4,030 210 0.041 8.6 0.116
1,635 500 0.078 39.0 0.026 4,070 210 0.041 8.6 0.116
1,700 480 0.076 36.5 0.027 4140 220 0.0415 9.1 0.110
1,793 515 0.072 37.1 0.027 4,120 250 0.0415 10.4 0.096
1,872 560 0.069 38.6 0.026 4,140 250 0.042 10.5 0.095
1,944 530 0.067 35.5 0.028 4,160 290 0.042 12.2 0.082
2,036 525 0.064 33.6 0.030 4,175 180 0.042 7.6 0.132
2,135 530 0.061 32.3 0.031 4,200 210 0.042 8.8 0.114
2,175 540 0.060 32.4 0.031 4,240 210 0.043 9.0 0.111
2,215 410 0.059 24.2 0.041 4,270 180 0.043 7.7 0.130
2,320 580 0.057 23.1 0.030 4,280 200 0.043 8.6 0.116
2,380 430 0.056 24.1 0.041 4,340 230 0.044 10.1 0.099
2,460 420 0.054 22.7 0.044 4,390 210 0.044 9.2 0.101
2,520 490 0.053 26.0 0.038 4,440 220 0.045 9.9 0.101
2,570 410 0.051 20.9 0.048 4,480 330 0.046 15.2 0.066
2,680 380 0.0495 18.8 0.053 4,560 330 0.047 15.5 0.065
2,760 390 0.0485 18.9 0.053 4,660 300 0.049 14.7 0.068
2,835 410 0.0475 19.5 0.051 4,700 320 0.0495 15.8 0.063
2,860 380 0.047 17.9 0.056 4,720 320 0.050 16.0 0.063
2,930 500 0.046 23.0 0.043 4,770 260 0.051 13.3 0.075
3,160 300 0.044 13.2 0.076 4,790 280 0.052 14.6 0.068
3,175 350 0.043 15.1 0.066 4,805 310 0.052 16.1 0.062
3,180 420 0.043 18.1 0.055 4,830 360 0.0525 18.9 0.053
3,210 300 0.043 12.9 0.078 4,870 270 0.054 14.6 0.068
3,230 380 0.043 16.3 0.061 4,890 280 0.054 15.1 0.066
3,330 300 0.042 12.6 0.079 4,950 220 0.055 12.2 0.083
3,370 240 0.042 10.1 0.099 5,025 180 0.057 10.3 0.097
3,390 290 0.042 12.2 0.082 5,100 190 0.060 11.4 0.088
3,435 260 0.041 10.7 0.093 5,200 120 0.062 7.4 0.135
3,520 290 0.041 11.9 0.084 5,275 110 0.0664 7.3 0.137
3,620 220 0.0405 8.9 0.112 5,300 90 0.0665 8.0 0.167
3,690 260 0.040 10.4 0.096
Table 5.8 - Sample Calculation of Fsh
ARPO IDENTIFICATION CODE PAGE 295 OF 299
ENI S.p.A.
Agip Division REVISION
STAP-P-1-M-6130 0
In order to obtain the most significant tsh values, and thus a more reliable value for the
pore pressure gradient, the following procedure is used:
Each shale bed is located by using the IES; as already explained, the points
where the shale is cleaner will be identified by the overlapping of the SP curve
with the shale base line and the overlapping of the short radius and long
radius resistivity curves.
Once the depth of the significant shale points is established on the IES, the
value for tsh, is read, at that same depth, on the Sonic Log.
The Calliper is also carefully checked so as to determine any influence of the
borehole diameter on tsh.
The tsh values are plotted as a function of depth on semilog paper with depth
on the Y axis and - tsh on the X axis. In this cast also the use of 1/20,000 or
1/10,000 is suggested.
Sample Calculation
These values are then plotted as shown in Figure 5.43. The values of tsh decrease
regularly with depth until about 3,800m, thereby indicating normal compaction and pore
pressure gradient conditions. At 3,800m (overpressure top) values have a tendency to
increase, thus indicating the presence of abnormal pressure zones. The pore pressure
gradient value remains in the range G = 1.40-1.50kg/cm. 10m up to about 5,400m here a
further pore pressure increase can be noted.
5.2.3. Limitations Of The Use Of Methods Based On The Processing Of Electrical Logs
Fsh Limitations
For a reliable quantitative evaluation of pore pressure gradients from Fsh, the following
points must be kept in mind:
The method is not applicable when dealing with carbonate formations; it can be
used only in the case of elastic formations.
When elastic formation are present, the method may be applied to frequently
interbedded sands and shales only; in fact the Rw curve cannot be determined in
zones where only shale is present.
If the shale formations under investigation contain fresh water the resistivity
value is higher, and, therefore, the calculated Fsh value is changed. The
compaction trend or the overpressure curve may undergo shifts that change the
value of the pore pressure gradient; shale formations are not normally pure
because they contain silt and sand; in consequence the resistivity (or
conductivity) value increases.
The SP value can be modified because of poor membrane behaviour of the
shales.
The SP value is difficult to choose the SP curve does not always perfectly
overlap the shale base line.
When evaporitic formations are located nearby, the salt content of the formation
water can be altered.
Borehole cavings or tightenings alter shale resistivity.
The presence of fluids other than water, such as gas or oil, can alter shale
conductivity.
Differences in the geological ages of the formations, as well as transgressive or
regressive phenomena, can change the electric properties of the rock medium.
sh Limitation
For a correct application of the sh method the following points must be considered:
The method may be used with elastic formations only
Application is limited since the FDC log is usually available only far short
sections of the borehole.
Depth m. t Depth m. tsh
1,015 170 4,030 74
1,167 138 4,070 73
1,227 127 4,110 73
1,260 125 4,120 73
1,330 130 4,140 75
1,513 120 4,160 75
1,532 120 4,175 73
1,558 100 4,200 75
1,635 118 4,240 74
1,700 110 4,270 70
1,793 105 4,280 72
1,872 110 4,340 75
1,944 110 4,390 70
2,036 109 4,440 69
2,135 99 4,480 75
2,175 99 4,560 76
2,215 96 4,660 74
2,320 94 4,700 75
2,460 90 4,720 72
2,520 90 4,770 71
2,570 90 4,790 70
2,680 88 4,805 72
2,760 90 4,830 73
2,835 88 4,870 70
2,860 84 4,890 69
3,210 80 4,950 70
3,230 80 5,025 69
3,330 75 5,100 69
3,370 74 5,200 66
3,435 75 5,275 68
3,620 70 5,375 68
3,690 78 5,390 62
3,760 72 5,420 63
3,800 75 5,465 67
3,820 76 5,475 68
3,840 77 5,490 69
3,920 73 5,520 73
3,870 73 5,540 83
3,990 73 5,580 76
Table 5.9 - Example tsh Calculation