You are on page 1of 6

ON THE VANISHING OF SELF EXTENSIONS OVER

COHEN-MACAULAY LOCAL RINGS


arXiv:1703.06160v1 [math.AC] 17 Mar 2017

TOKUJI ARAYA, OLGUR CELIKBAS, ARASH SADEGHI, AND RYO TAKAHASHI

A BSTRACT. The celebrated Auslander-Reiten Conjecture, on the vanishing of self exten-


sions of a module, is one of the long-standing conjectures in ring theory. Although it is still
open, there are several results in the literature that establish the conjecture over Gorenstein
rings under certain conditions. The purpose of this article is to obtain extensions of such
results over Cohen-Macaulay local rings that admit canonical modules. In particular, our
main result recovers theorems of Araya, and Ono and Yoshino simultaneously.

1. I NTRODUCTION
Throughout R denotes a commutative Noetherian local ring and mod R denotes the cat-
egory of all finitely generated R-modules.
There are various conjectures from the representation theory of algebras that have been
transplanted to Commutative Algebra. One of the most important such conjectures is the
celebrated Auslander-Reiten Conjecture [2], which states that a finitely generated module
M over an Artin algebra A satisfying ExtiA (M, M) = ExtiA (M, A) = 0 for all i 1 must be
projective. This long-standing conjecture is closely related to other important conjectures
such as the Nakayamas Conjecture [12] and the Tachikawa Conjecture [3, 15]. Although
the Auslander-Reiten Conjecture was initially proposed over Artin algebras, it can be stated
over arbitrary Noetherian rings; in local algebra, the conjecture is known as follows:
Conjecture 1.1. (Auslander and Reiten [2]) Let R be a local ring and let M mod R. If
ExtiR (M, M) = ExtiR (M, R) = 0 for all i 1, then M is free.
Recently there have been significant interest and hence some progress towards the
Auslander-Reiten conjecture; see, for example, [6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11]. A particular result
worth recording on the Auslander-Reiten Conjecture is due to Huneke and Leuschke: the
Auslander-Reiten Conjecture holds over Gorenstein normal domains; see [10, 1.3]. An-
other result in this direction, which is of interest to us, is due to Araya [1]. For a nonnega-
tive integer n and an R-module M, we set X n (R) = {p Spec(R) : height(p) n} and say
M is locally free on X n (R) if Mp is a free Rp -module for each prime ideal p X n (R).
Theorem 1.2. (Araya [1]) Let R be a Gorenstein local ring of dimension d 2 and let
M mod R. Then M is free provided that the following hold:
(i) M is locally free on X d1 (R).
(ii) M is maximal Cohen-Macaulay.
(iii) Extd1
R (M, M) = 0.

2000 Mathematics Subject Classification. 13D07, 13H10.


Key words and phrases. Auslander-Reiten Conjecture, vanishing of Ext and Tor, canonical modules.
Araya and Takahashi were partly supported by JSPS Grants-in-Aid for Scientific Research 26400056 and
16K05098, respectively. Sadeghis research was supported by a grant from IPM.
1
2 T. ARAYA, O. CELIKBAS, A. SADEGHI, AND R. TAKAHASHI

Ono and Yoshino [13] relaxed the condition that M is free on X d1 (R) in Arayas the-
orem under the hypothesis that ExtiR (M, M) vanishes for i = d 2 and i = d 1. More
precisely they proved:
Theorem 1.3. (Ono and Yoshino [13]) Let R be a Gorenstein local ring of dimension d 3
and let M mod R be a module. Then M is free provided that the following hold:
(i) M is locally free on X d2 (R).
(ii) M is maximal Cohen-Macaulay.
(iii) Extd2 d1
R (M, M) = ExtR (M, M) = 0.

We set () = HomR (, R), () = Hom(, E), where E is the injective hull of the
residue field of R, and () = HomR (, ) where is a canonical module of R. Recall that
M mod R is said to satisfy (S2 ) if depthRp (Mp ) {2, heightR (p)} for all p Supp(M).
The main aim of this paper is to prove the following result.
Theorem 1.4. Let R be a Cohen-Macaulay local ring of dimension d with canonical mod-
ule and let M mod R. Assume n is an integer with 1 n d 1. Then M is free
provided that the following hold:
(i) pdRp (Mp ) < for all p X n (R).
(ii) M satisfies (S2 ) and M is maximal Cohen-Macaulay.
(iii) ExtiR (M, (M ) ) = 0 for all i = n, . . . , d 1.
An immediate consequence of Theorem 1.4 is:
Corollary 1.5. Let R be a Cohen-Macaulay normal local domain of dimension d with
canonical module and let M mod R. Then M is free provided that the following hold:
(i) M satisfies (S2 ) and M is maximal Cohen-Macaulay.
(ii) ExtiR (M, (M ) ) = 0 for all i = 1, . . . , d 1.
As maximal Cohen-Macaulay modules satisfy (S2 ) over Gorenstein rings, we deduce
from Theorem 1.4 that:
Corollary 1.6. Let R be a Gorenstein local ring of dimension d and let M mod R. Assume
n is an integer with 1 n d 1. Then M is free provided that the following hold:
(i) M is locally free on X n (R).
(ii) M is maximal Cohen-Macaulay.
(iii) ExtiR (M, M) = 0 for all i = n, . . . , d 1.
Note that we recover heorems 1.2 and 1.3 from Corollary 1.6 by letting n = d 1
and n = d 2, respectively. Corollary 1.6 especially yields an extension of a result of
Huneke and Leuschke [10] mentioned preceding Theorem 1.2. More precisely we obtain
the following; see Corollary 2.6.
Corollary 1.7. Let R be a d-dimensional Gorenstein local normal domain and let M be a
maximal Cohen-Macaulay R-module. Then M is free if and only if ExtiR (M, M) = 0 for all
i = 1, . . . , d 1.
Let us remark that Huneke and Leuschke [10, 3.1] obtains the conclusion of Corollary
1.7, when ExtiR (M, M) vanishes for all i = 1, . . . , d; see the discussion following Corollary
2.6. Let us also remark that one can in fact prove Theorem 1.3 and Corollary 1.7 by using
the proof of Theorem 1.2 given by Araya; see [1]. Our main argument is more general
than both of these results; it is quite short and works over Cohen-Macaulay rings that
are not necessarily Gorenstein. Hence we will deduce Theorem 1.3 and Corollary 1.7 as
ON THE VANISHING OF SELF EXTENSIONS OVER COHEN-MACAULAY LOCAL RINGS 3

immediate corollaries of Theorem 1.4 in the next section without making use of the proof
of Theorem 1.2; see also Corollary 2.7.

2. M AIN RESULT AND COROLLARIES

In this section we give a proof of our main result, Theorem 1.4. Following our proof
we state two corollaries, one of which extends the result of Huneke and Leuschke [10]
mentioned preceding Theorem 1.2. We start with a few notations and preliminary results.
2.1. Let M, N mod R. We denote by HomR (M, N) the residue of HomR (M, N) by the R-
submodule consisting of the R-module homomorphisms from M to N that factor through
free modules.
It follows from the definition that M is free if and only if HomR (M, M) = 0. We also
remark that HomR (M, N) = TorR1 (TrM, N), where TrM is the (Auslander) transpose of M;
see [17, 3.9].
2.2. ([4, 1.4.1]) Let R be a Cohen-Macaulay local ring such that depth(R) 2 and let
M mod R. If M satisfies (S2 ) and pdRp (Mp ) < for all p X 1 (R), then M is reflexive.
2.3. ([16, 2.2]) Let R be a local ring and let M, N mod R. If N is maximal Cohen-Macaulay
and pd(M) < , then TorRi (M, N) = 0 for all i 1.
For our proof of Theorem 1.4, we will make use [5, 3.1], which is well-known over
Artinian rings. Since we record an improved version of that result, we give a proof along
with its statement.
2.4. ([5, 3.1]) Let R be a d-dimensional Cohen-Macaulay local ring with a canonical mod-
ule and let M, N mod R. If pdRp (Mp ) < for all p X d1 (R) and N is maximal
Cohen-Macaulay, then the following isomorphism holds for all i 1:
Extd (TorR (M, N), ).
Extd+i (M, N ) =
R R i
To see this isomorphism, we note, by [14, 10.62], that there is a third quadrant spectral
sequence:
ExtRp (TorRq (M, N), ) = ExtnR (M, N )
p
Let p X d1 (R). Then, since pdRp (Mp ) < and N p is maximal Cohen-Macaulay over
R p , we conclude that TorRi (M, N) p = 0 for all i 1; see 2.3. Therefore TorRq (M, N) has
finite length for all q > 0. Hence, unless p = d, ExtRp (TorRq (M, N), ) = 0. It follows that
the spectral sequence considered collapses and hence gives the desired isomorphism.
We can now prove our main result.
A proof of Theorem 1.4. Note, it follows from our hypotheses and 2.2, that M is reflexive.
Set N = M and note M = 2 TrN. Therefore pdRp ((TrN)p ) < for all p X n (R).
n
Let p X (R). Then, since Np is maximal Cohen-Macaulay, it follows from 2.3 that
TorRi (TrN, N)p = 0 for all i 1. In particular TorR1 (TrN, N)p = 0, and this implies Np is
free over Rp ; see 2.1. Since M is reflexive, we conclude that Mp is free. Consequently M
is a reflexive module that is locally free on X n (R).
Let p Spec(R). We proceed by induction on heightR (p) and prove that Mp is free over
Rp . If height(p) n, then Mp is free by the above argument. So we assume height(p) = t >
n. Localizing at p, we may assume (R, m) is a Cohen-Macaulay local ring with a canonical
module , dim(R) = t > n 1, M is reflexive and locally free on X t1 (R), M is maximal

Cohen-Macaulay and Extt1 R (M, (M ) ) = 0.
4 T. ARAYA, O. CELIKBAS, A. SADEGHI, AND R. TAKAHASHI

Note that N = M
= M and N = (M ) is maximal Cohen-Macaulay. Moreover
t1
ExtR (N , N ) = 0 by the hypothesis. Hence the following isomorphisms hold:
0 = Extt1 Extt+1 (TrN, N )
R (N , N ) = R

= ExttR (TorR1 (TrN, N), )
(1.4.1)
= m (TorR1 (TrN, N))

= TorR1 (TrN, N)

= HomR (N, N).
The first isomorphism of (1.4.1) follows from the fact that N 2 TrN, while the second
and third ones follow from 2.4 and the Local Duality Theorem [4, 3.5.9], respectively.
The fourth isomorphism is due to the fact that TorR1 (TrN, N) has finite length. The fifth
isomorphism, and the freeness of N, follows from 2.1. As M is reflexive, we conclude that
M = N is free. 
If R is a Gorenstein local ring and M is a maximal Cohen-Macaulay R-module, then M
satisfies (S2 ), M is maximal Cohen-Macaulay and (M )
= M. Hence, as an immediate
consequence of Theorem 1.4, we obtain Corollary 1.6.
To obtain another corollary of Theorem 1.4, we apply the next result:
2.5. ([3, B4]) Let R be a Cohen-Macaulay local ring of dimension d with a canonical
module and let M mod R. If ExtiR (M, R) = 0 for all i = 1, . . . , d, then M R
= (M ) .
Corollary 2.6. Let R be a Cohen-Macaulay local ring of dimension d with a canonical
module and let M mod R. Assume n is an integer with 1 n d 1. Then M is free
provided that the following holds:
(i) pdRp (Mp ) < for all p X n (R).
(ii) M is reflexive and ExtiR (M, R) = 0 for all i = 1, . . . , d (e.g., M is totally reflexive.)
(iii) ExtiR (M, M R ) = 0 for all i = n, . . . , d 1.
Proof. The vanishing of ExtiR (M, R) for all i = 1, . . . , d forces M to be a dth syzygy mod-
ule, i.e., a maximal Cohen-Macaulay module. Therefore the conclusion follows from The-
orem 1.4 and 2.5. 
We point out that the case where R is Gorenstein and n = 1 of Corollary 2.6 yields
Corollary 1.7 advertised in the introduction.
Corollary 2.6 allows us to generalize [13, 5.5], another result of Ono and Yoshino.
Corollary 2.7. Let R be a Cohen-Macaulay local ring of dimension d with a canonical
module and let M mod R. Assume n is an integer with 1 n d 1. Then M is free
provided that the following holds:
(i) M is locally free on X dn (R).
(ii) M is reflexive and ExtiR (M, R) = 0 for all i = 1, . . . , d.
(iii) depthR (Extdi
R (M, M R )) i for all i = 1, . . . , n.

Proof. Suppose M is not free. Then the nonfree locus NF(M) of M is not empty. Let
NF(M) = V (I) for some ideal I of R with heightR (I) = t. Then it follows from (i) that
t d n + 1. Setting i = d t + 1, we obtain from (iii) that
(2.7.1) depthR (Extt1
R (M, M R )) d t + 1.
On the other hand, since X t1 (R) * V (I), we see M is locally free on X t1 (R). This implies
(2.7.2) dimR (Extt1
R (M, M R )) d t.
ON THE VANISHING OF SELF EXTENSIONS OVER COHEN-MACAULAY LOCAL RINGS 5

Consequently, by (2.7.1) and (2.7.2), we conclude Extt1 R (M, M R ) = 0.


Let p NF(M) with heightR (p) = t. Then Mp is locally free on X t1 (Rp ), Mp is re-
flexive over Rp , ExtiRp (Mp , Rp ) = 0 for all i = 1, . . . ,t, and Extt1
Rp (Mp , Mp Rp p ) = 0.
Therefore it follows from Corollary 2.6 that Mp is free over Rp , which is a contradiction.
So M is free. 

Huneke and Leuschke [10, 3.1] proved, when R is a d-dimensional complete Cohen-
Macaulay local ring such that Rp is a complete intersection for all p X 1 (R), and R is either
Gorenstein or contains Q, a maximal Cohen-Macaulay R-module M of constant rank is free
provided ExtiR (M, R) = ExtiR (M , R) = 0 for all i = 1, . . . , d and ExtiR (M, M) = 0 for all
i = 1, . . . , max{2, d}. Consequently, when R is a Gorenstein normal domain of dimension
d 2 and M is a maximal Cohen-Macaulay R-module, the result of Huneke and Leuschke
[10, 3.1] requires the vanishing of ExtiR (M, M) = 0 for all i = 1, . . . , d to conclude that M is
free, whilst Corollary 1.7 requires the vanishing of ExtiR (M, M) = 0 for all i = 1, . . . , d 1
for the same conclusion under the same setup.
As Huneke and Leuschke [10] studied the Auslander and Reiten Conjecture for mod-
ules that have constant rank, it seems worth finishing this section with a related example:
it shows that the hypothesis that M is locally free on X d1 (R) cannot be removed from
Corollary 1.6 even if M has constant rank.

Example 2.8. Let k be a field and let R := k[[x, y, z, u, v]]/(xy uv). Then R is a four
dimensional hypersurface domain. In particular any module in mod R has constant rank.
Consider the following minimal free resolution:

B A B A
(2.8.1) F = ( R2 R2 R2 R2 0),

   
x u y u
where A = and B = . Set M = cokerA.
v y v x
Applying HomR (, M) to (2.8.1), we have
tA tB tA tB
(2.8.2) 0 M 2 M 2 M 2 M 2 .
Since t B : M 2 M 2 is injective, we conclude that Ext2i1
R (M, M) = 0 for all i 1.
Let p := (x, y, u, v). Then p is a prime ideal of R of height three. Localizing (2.8.1) at p,
we get the following exact sequence:
B A B A
(2.8.3) R2p R2p R2p R2p Mp 0.
Since x, y, u, v pRp , (2.8.3) is a minimal free resolution of Mp . In particular Mp is not a
free Rp -module, i.e., M is not locally free on X 3 (R).

ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
We are grateful to Lars Christensen, Mohsen Gheibi, Greg Piepmeyer, Srikanth Iyengar
and Naoki Taniguchi for their feedback on the manuscript.
Part of this work was completed when Araya visited West Virginia University in January
and February 2017. He is grateful for the kind hospitality of the WVU Department of
Mathematics.
6 T. ARAYA, O. CELIKBAS, A. SADEGHI, AND R. TAKAHASHI

R EFERENCES
[1] Tokuji Araya, The Auslander-Reiten conjecture for Gorenstein rings, Proc. Amer. Math. Soc. 137 (2009),
no. 6, 19411944. 1, 2
[2] Maurice Auslander and Idun Reiten, On a generalized version of the Nakayama conjecture, Proc. Amer.
Math. Soc. 52 (1975), 6974. 1
[3] Luchezar L. Avramov, Ragnar-Olaf Buchweitz, and Liana M. Sega, Extensions of a dualizing complex by
its ring: commutative versions of a conjecture of Tachikawa, J. Pure Appl. Algebra 201 (2005), no. 1-3,
218239. MR 2158756 1, 4
[4] Winfried Bruns and Jurgen Herzog, Cohen-Macaulay rings, Cambridge Studies in Advanced Mathematics,
vol. 39, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 1993. 3, 4
[5] Olgur Celikbas and Hailong Dao, Necessary conditions for the depth formula over Cohen-Macaulay local
rings, J. Pure Appl. Algebra 218 (2014), 522530. 3
[6] Olgur Celikbas and Ryo Takahashi, Auslander-Reiten conjecture and Auslander-Reiten duality, J. Algebra
382 (2013), 100114. 1
[7] Lars Winther Christensen and Henrik Holm, Algebras that satisfy Auslanders condition on vanishing of
cohomology, Math. Z. 265 (2010), no. 1, 2140. 1
[8] , Vanishing of cohomology over Cohen-Macaulay rings, Manuscripta Math. 139 (2012), no. 3-4,
535544. 1
[9] Shiro Goto and Ryo Takahashi, On the Auslander-Reiten conjecture for Cohen-Macaulay local rings., Proc.
Amer. Math. Soc. (to appear). 1
[10] Craig Huneke and Graham J. Leuschke, On a conjecture of Auslander and Reiten, J. Algebra 275 (2004),
no. 2, 781790. 1, 2, 3, 5
[11] Craig Huneke, Liana M. Sega, and Adela N. Vraciu, Vanishing of Ext and Tor over some Cohen-Macaulay
local rings, Illinois J. Math. 48 (2004), no. 1, 295317. 1
[12] Tadasi Nakayama, On algebras with complete homology, Abh. Math. Sem. Univ. Hamburg 22 (1958), 300
307. 1
[13] Maiko Ono and Yuji Yoshino, An AuslanderReiten principle in derived categories, J. Pure Appl. Algebra
221 (2017), no. 6, 12681278. 2, 4
[14] Joseph J. Rotman, An introduction to homological algebra, Universitext, Springer, New York, 2009. 3
[15] Hiroyuki Tachikawa, Quasi-Frobenius rings and generalizations. QF 3 and QF 1 rings, Lecture Notes
in Mathematics, vol. 351, Springer-Verlag, Berlin-New York, 1973. 1
[16] Ken-ichi, Yoshida, Tensor products of perfect modules and maximal surjective Buchsbaum modules, J. Pure
Appl. Algebra, 123 (1998), no. 1-3, 313326. 3
[17] Yuji Yoshino, Cohen-Macaulay modules over Cohen-Macaulay rings, London Mathematical Society Lec-
ture Note Series, vol. 146, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 1990. 3

T OKUJI A RAYA , D EPARTMENT OF A PPLIED S CIENCE , FACULTY OF S CIENCE , O KAYAMA U NIVERSITY


OF S CIENCE , R IDAICHO , K ITAKU , O KAYAMA 700-0005, JAPAN .
E-mail address: araya@das.ous.ac.jp

O LGUR C ELIKBAS , D EPARTMENT OF M ATHEMATICS , W EST V IRGINIA U NIVERSITY , M ORGANTOWN ,


WV 26506-6310, U.S.A
E-mail address: olgur.celikbas@math.wvu.edu

A RASH S ADEGHI , S CHOOL OF M ATHEMATICS , I NSTITUTE FOR R ESEARCH IN F UNDAMENTAL S CI -


ENCES (IPM), P.O. B OX : 19395-5746, T EHRAN , I RAN
E-mail address: sadeghiarash61@gmail.com

RYO TAKAHASHI , G RADUATE S CHOOL OF M ATHEMATICS , N AGOYA U NIVERSITY, F UROCHO , C HIKUSAKU ,


N AGOYA 464-8602, JAPAN
E-mail address: takahashi@math.nagoya-u.ac.jp
URL: http://www.math.nagoya-u.ac.jp/~takahashi/