You are on page 1of 9

Republic of the Philippines

Department of Education
Region iIV A CALABARZON
Division of Batangas City
BANABA EAST ELEMENTARY SCHOOL
Batangas City
INDIVIDUAL PERFORMANCE COMMITMENT AND REVIEW FORM (IPCRF)
Name of Employee: Rhea M. Engay Name of Rater: Filomeno D. Madlangbayan
Position: Teacher I Position: Head Treacher III
Review Period: June 2016- March 2017

KRAs OBJECTIVES TIMELINE WEIGHT PERFORMANCE INDICATORS ACTUAL RATING SCORE


per KRA RESULT
Q E T A

A. Teaching- 1. Prepared 5 June- 10% 5- 5 Daily lesson plans DLLs were


Learning Process lesson plans /daily March prepared with simplicity and neatness. 5 5 4 14 4.67 .47
logs of activities 2017 4-4 Daily lesson plans DLLs were
with simplicity and prepared with simplicity and neatness.
neatness, 3-3 daily lesson plans DLLs were
integrated values, prepared with simplicity and neatness.
K-12 BEC, 2-2 Daily lesson plans DLLs were
maintained prepared with simplicity and neatness.
congruency daily. 1.1 Daily lesson plans DLLs were
prepared with simplicity and
neatness.

2. Facilitated June 10% 5-5 Classes taught facilitated learning 4 4 5 13 4.33 .43
learning in 5 March through innovative teaching strategies
classes taught 2017 and appropriate instructional materials
through innovative daily.
teaching strategies 4-4 Classes taught facilitated learning
and appropriate through innovative teaching strategies
instructional and appropriate instructional materials
materials daily. daily.
3-3 Classes taught facilitated learning
through innovative teaching strategies
and appropriate instructional materials
daily.
2-2 Classes taught facilitated learning
through innovative teaching strategies
and appropriate instructional materials
daily.
1.1 Classes taught facilitated learning
through innovative teaching
strategies and appropriate
instructional materials daily.
3.67 .37
3. Facilitated June- 5-5 Subject areas were taught and 4 4 3 11
engaging lessons March 10% facilitated with the help of ICT .
in 5 subject areas 2017 4-4 Subject areas were taught and
with the help of facilitated with the help of ICT.
ICT daily. 3-3 Subject areas were taught and
facilitated with the help of ICT.
2-2 Subject areas were taught and
facilitated with the help of ICT.
1.1 Subject areas were taught and
facilitated with the help of ICT.
4.33 .43
B.Pupils Outcome 1. Motivated in 5 June- 5-5 Subject areas were monitored with 4 4 5 13
subject areas March 10% evaluated and submitted learner
evaluated and 2017 records on time.
submitted learners 4-4 Subject areas were monitored with
record on time evaluated and submitted learner
quarterly. records on time.
3-3 Subject areas were monitored with
evaluated and submitted learner
records on time.
2-2 Subject areas were monitored with
evaluated and submitted learner
records on time.
1.1 Subject areas were monitored with
evaluated and submitted learner
records on time .
3.67 .37
2. Administered 6 June- 5-5 6 Teacher made tests were 3 4 4 11
teacher made test March 10% administered with testing materials
with testing 2017 carefully prepared following the table of
materials carefully specification carefully.
prepared following 4-4 5 Teacher made tests were
the table of administered with testing materials
specification carefully .
quarterly. 3-3 4 Teacher made tests were
administered with testing materials
carefully.
2-2 3 Teacher made tests were
administered with testing materials
carefully.
1.1 2 Teacher made tests were
administered with testing materials
carefully.
10% 3.67 .37
3. Increased the June- 5- 75% of pupils increased the general 3 4 4 11
general average of March average by 1% with documents and
75% of pupils by 1 2017 data properly kept by teachers quarterly.
% with documents 4- 70% of pupils increased the general
and data properly average by 1% with documents and
kept by the data properly kept by teachers quarterly.
teacher quarterly. 3- 65% of pupils increased the general
average by 1% with documents and
data properly kept by teachers quarterly.
2- 60% of pupils increased the general
average by 1% with documents and
data properly kept by teachers quarterly.
1-55% of pupils increased the general
average by 1% with documents and
data properly kept by teachers quarterly.

5- Evidence showed that the teacher


attended at least four seminars/
training/workshops by March 2017.
4- Evidence showed that the teacher
10% attended at least four 4 .40
C. Personal and 1. Participated/ June- seminars/training/workshops by March 4 4 4 12
Professional growth Attended on 4 March 2017.
and Development seminars/SLAC 2017 3- Evidence showed that the teacher
session/meeting in attended at least four
cluster, district, seminars/training/workshops by March
division etc with 2017.
Certificate of 2- Evidence showed that the teacher
Participation by attended at least four
March 2017. seminars/training/workshops by March
2017.
1-Evidence showed that the teacher
attended at least four
seminars/training/workshops by March
2017

5- 5 Workshops/talks/seminars/contests
were facilitated with complete
requirements/documents filed in the
5% office by March 2017.
4- 4 Workshops/ 4 .20
2. Facilitated at June- talks/seminars/contests were facilitated 4 4 4 12
least 5 March with complete requirements/documents
professional 2017 filed in the office by March 2017.
workshops/talks 3-3 Workshops/talks/seminars/contests
/seminars/ were facilitated with complete
projects/contests requirements/documents filed in the
with complete office by March 2017.
requirements/docu 2-2 Workshops/talks/seminars/contests
ments filed in the were facilitated with complete
office by March requirements/documents filed in the
2017 office by March 2017.
1.1 Workshops/talks/seminars/contests
were facilitated with complete
requirements/documents filed in the
office by March 2017

5-4 LMs in 4 grade levels were


5% prepared through the collaboration with
fellow teachers or appropriate authority
to develop the method through the
school to school partnership with 4 .20
3. Collaborate with June- teacher will be evaluated by December 4 4 4 12
fellow teachers on December 2016.
the appropriate 2016 4- 3 LMs in 4 grade levels were
authority to prepared through the collaboration with
develop the fellow teachers or appropriate with
method through fellow teachers or appropriate authority
school to school to develop the method through the
partnership which school to school partnership with
the teacher will be teacher will be evaluated by December
able to prepare 2016.
LMs in Science in 3- 2 LMs in 4 grade levels were
4 grade levels by prepared through the collaboration with
December 2016. fellow teachers or appropriate authority
to develop the method through the
school to school partnership with
teacher will be evaluated by December
2016.
2- 1 LMs in 4 grade levels were
prepared through the collaboration with
fellow teachers or appropriate authority
to develop the method through the
school to school partnership with
teacher will be evaluated by December
2016.
1-0 LMs in 4 grade levels were
prepared through the collaboration
with fellow teachers or appropriate
authority to develop the method
through the school to school
partnership with teacher will be
evaluated by December 2016.

5% 5- 5 Meetings were conducted to PTA


(HRPTA/GPTA) to update them with
their childrens performance with
documentation by March 2017.
4- 4 Meetings were conducted to PTA 4 .20
D. Community 1.Conducted/atten June (HRPTA/GPTA) to update them with 4 4 4 12
Involvement ded 5 regular 2016- their childrens performance with
scheduled PTA March documentation by March 2017.
(HRPTA/GPTA)me 2017 3-3 Meetings were conducted to PTA
eting/conferences (HRPTA/GPTA) to update them with
to update them their childrens performance with
with their documentation by March 2017.
childrens 2-2 Meetings were conducted to PTA
performance with (HRPTA/GPTA) to update them with
documentation by their childrens performance with
March 2017 documentation by March 2017.
1-1 Meeting were conducted to PTA
(HRPTA/GPTA) to update them with
their childrens performance with
documentation by March 2017.
2%
5- Participated in five or more events
/activities (es. Fun Run, Alay Lakad,
Education Summit, Tree Planting)
4- Participated in 4 events/ activities.
3- Participated in 3 events/ activities. 4 .08
2. Participated in 5 June 2- Participated in 2 events/ activities 4 4 4 12
events/activities 2016- 1-Participated in 1 event/activity.
organized by March
LGUs or 2017
community with
reports submitted 3%
to the 5- Without reported incident of conflict.
District/Division 4- With one reported incident of
Office by March conflicts.
2016. 3-With two reported incident of conflicts.
2- With three reported incident of 4.33 .13
3.Maintained June conflicts. 4 4 5 13
harmonious 2016- 5% 1-With four reported incident of
relationships with March conflicts.
superiors, peers, 2016
parents, pupils 5- Acted as chairman/coordinator/key
and other teacher/project team leader in division
stakeholders. level with complete documents by
March 2017.
4- Acted as chairman/coordinator/key 2.67 .13
E. Plus Factor 1. Acted as grade June teacher/project team leader in district 2 3 3 8
level 2016- level with complete documents by
chairman/coordina March March 2017.
tor/ key 2017 3- Acted as chairman/coordinator/key
teacher/project teacher/project team leader in school
team leader in level with complete documents by
division/district/sch March 2017.
ool level by march 2- Acted as chairman/coordinator/key
2017 teacher/project team leader in school
level with partial documents by March
2017.
1- Acted as chairman/coordinator/key
3% teacher/project team leader in school
level without by March 2017.

5-Never been late in a year and


participated in all school programs and
projects.
4-Has been late two times in a year and
did not participate in one school 4.67 .14
2. Punctuality/ June programs and projects. 4 5 5 14
Attendance in all 2016- 3- Has been late three times in a year
school department March and did not participate in one school
programs and 2017 programs and projects
projects by March 2- Has been late four times in a year
2017 and did not participate in one school
programs and projects.
2% 1- Has been late five times in a year
and did not participate in one school
programs and projects.

5- Evidence showed that training lead to


improvement of teaching competency
through improve lesson plans
implementation and strategy.
4- Meet 4 out of the 5 indicator. 4 .08
3. Attended June 3- Meet 3 out of the 5 indicator. 4 4 4 12
teacher s 2016- 2-Meet 2 out of the 5 indicator.
training/seminar to March 1-Meet 1 out of the 5 indicator.
improve teaching 2017
competency at
least twice a year.
Overall Rating for 4.000
Accomplishment

RATEE
RHEA M. ENGAY
FILOMENO D. MADLANGBAYAN
RATER

You might also like