art & science clinical skills: 25
Monitoring and recording patients'
neurological observations
Dawes E e* af (2007) Monitoring and recording patients' neurological observations. Nursitig Statidard.
22.10, 40-45. Date of acceptance: July 17 2007
Sumniary
This article provides a detailed account of how to monitor and
record neurological observations. It outlines the importance of
neurological observations in acutely ill patients and focuses on
carrying out observations using the Glasgow Coma Scale.
Authors
Emma Dawes is practice development nurse, Hilary Lloyd is
principal lecturer, Lesley Durham is nurse consultant in critical care,
Sunderland Royal Hospital, Sunderland.
Email: emma.dawesCcDchs.northy.nhs.uk
Keywords
Clinical skills; Neurological observations; Vital signs
These keywords are based on the subject headings from the British
Nursing Index. This article has been subject to double-blind review.
Eor author and research article guidelines visit the Nursing Standard
home page at www.nurstng-standard.co.uk. For related articles
visit our online archive and search using the keywords.
THE IMPORTANCE of iinderuking
neurological observations in acutely ill patients
cannot be overstressed. Neurological status
should be observed and recorded accurately in
patients to monitor their level of consciousness
for signs of deterioration, stability and
Improvement. The main methods for
undertaking this are by: monitoring
consciousness level; observingpupil
reactions; assessing motor function; and
observing vital signs.
There are many possible neurological
presentations that a nurse may encounter (Walsh
2006}. The challenge for the busy nurse includes
the quick recognition of acute events, for
example, head iniuryjnfection., haemorrhage or
post-surgery complications and the monitoring
and recording of neurological observations.
The aim of this article is to provide nurses with
knowledge to reliably and accurately monitor
and record neurological status.
It is important that nursing staff, particularly
those working in the acute ward setting, are
competent to monitor and record neurological
4 0 november 14 :; vol 22 no 10 :: 2007
observations and to keep up to date with the
clinical skills required to ensure high levels of
patient safety and quality care. As the acuity of
ward-based patients continues to escalate, all
ward staff need to develop knowledge and skills
in both the recognition and management of
at-risk and critically ill patients (Department
ofHealth(DH)2065a).
Observation charts
A validated observational chart is the most
common iTiethod of monitoring and recording
neurological observations. Although the layout
may differ from chart to chart, in essence, all
neurological observation charts measure and
record the same clinical information, including
the level of consciousness, pupil size and
response, motor and sensory response and vital
signs. It is only through consideration of all of
these components that an accurate clinical
assessment of the patient's neurological status
can be obtained. Observational charts ensure a
systematic approach to collecting and analysing
essential information regarding a patient's
condition. Such charts also act as a means of
communication between nurses and other bealth
professionals. The information collected is vital
and can be used in the following ways:
Toaid diagnosis (Douglas ef a/2005).
As a baseline of observations (Crouch and
Meurier2005).
To determine both subtle and rapid changes
in an individual's condition (Crouch and
Meurier2005).
To monitor neurological status following a
neurological procedure (Mooney and
Comerford2003).
To observe for deterioration and establish the
extentofa traumatic head injury (Walsh
2006).
To detect life-threatening situations (Alcock
etal 2002).
NURSING STANDARD
Nurses should be aware when taking initial
observations that they are important as they may
indicate that a patient requires immediate
medical attention. Ongoing observations are just
asiniportant as they may liulicLUeLi change in the
patient's condition. Often small changes in
neurological status are not always obvious until
compared with previous observations. A rapid
ttecline in neurological observations will alert the
luirse Ct) seek tirgcnt assistance.
Glasgow Coma Scale 1 he Glasgow Coma Scale
(GCS) (Table 1), first developed byTeasdaleand
jennett (1974)., is a common way to assess a
patient's conscious level. It forms a quick,
objective and easily interpreted mode of
neurological assessment. The GCS measures
arousal, awareness and activity, by assessing
three different areas of the patient's behaviour
including:
Eye opening.
Verbal response.
Motor response.
Each area is allocated a score, therefore
enabling obiectivity, ease of recording and
comparison between recordings. The total sum
provides a score out of 15. A score of 15
indicates a fully alert and responsive patient,
whereas a score of three (the lowest possible
score) indicates unconsciousness. As well as an
overall score, a score for each area of
assessment should also be recorded and
reported separately. Figure 1 provides
TABLE 1
Glasgow Coma Scale
Response
Best eye response
> Open spontaneously
> Open to verbal command
> Open to pain
No eye opening
Best verbal response
> Orientated
Confused
Inappropriate words
lncomprehensibie sounds
No verbal response
Best motor response
> Obeys commands
> Localises pain
Withdrawal from pain
Flexion to pain
Extension to pain
No motor response
(National Institute for Clinical Excellence 2003)
NURSING STANDARD
instruction on how to use the GCS.
Using painful stitmtli Vainiul stimuli should be
applied in a careful and purposeful manner once
and for no longer than 30 seconds [Woodward
1997a). Under no circumstance should the
sternal rub or nail-bed pressure methods be
used as they may cause prolonged discomfort
and bruising (Shah 1999, Crawford and
Guerrero 2004, Watcrhouse 2005). Table 2
providesasummary of the evidence base for
different methods of applying painful stimuli.
Before initiating painful stimuli it is important
that the patient or family members are informed
ofthe procedure and why it is necessary.
Recording observations
It is important that nursing staff record exactly
what is being observed as changes to the
patient's condition can be rapid and may
require an urgent response. Waterhouse (2005)
recommended picturing a photograph being
taken of the patient that captures what is being
seen at a particular point in time. It is important
that nursing staff record individual findings
rather than comparing and being influenced by
a previous set of observations. Nursing staff
should not seek conformity with previous
recordings (Woodrow 2000). Any concerns
about changes between the current and
previous recording should be reported and
appropriate action taken.
There is no published consensus on how
frequently observations should he documented
(Mooney and Comerford 2003). For head
injury patients, the NICE (2003) guidance
recommended that a GCS of less than 15
necessitates 30-minute observations until the
Score maximum score of 15 is reached. In addition,
when a score of 15 is achieved, observations
should then be performed every half hour for two
4 hours, hourly for four hours and then
3
2
two hourly thereafter. For the unconscious
1 patient, Walsh (2006) recommended 15-minute
observations and suggested that these should be
carried out more frequently if the level of
5 consciousness is fluctuating.
4 As with any assessment process it is essential
3 to start by informing the patient of the procedure
2 and where possible obtain verbal consent
1
(Douglas eif a/2005). When assessing
neurological deficit it is important to record the
6 best arm response. The reason for this is to ensure
5 measurement of neurological status, rather than
4 injury or disability. There is no need to record left
3 and right differences, as the GCS does not aim to
2 measure focal deficit, this should he completed in
1 the limb assessment. Leg responses should not be
measured becauseoftherisk ofa spinal rather
than a brain-initiated response.
november 14 :: vol 22 no 10 :: 2007 4 1

art & science clinical skills: 25
It is important to note that a patient who is
unahle to open his or her eye(s) as a result of
swelling or surgery does not necessarily indicate a
low or falling conscious level. Likewise an absence
ot speech does not necessarily indicate a low or
falling conscious level. Language difficulties or
dysphasia will make it impossible to make an
accurate assessment of consciousness (Crawford
and Guerrero 2004) and should be taken into
account in the overall assessment process.

FIGURE 1
How to use the Glasgow Coma Scale

Observation i Score Method

Eye opening:
If the patient is unable to open his or her eye(s) as a result of trauma or surgery, the letter 'C - indicating closed - should be recorded in
the first box. Otherwise this section should be completed as follows:

Tlie score indicates the 4 = Spontaneously The patient's eyes should open spontaneously as you approach. If the patient
patient's state of arousal is asieep, wake the patient, ensuring he or she is fully roused and then
complete the assessment

3 = To speech Tlie patient will respond to your voice. T)ie best way to do this is to say his
or her name. If there is no initial response, a raised voice should be used.

2 = To pain The patient opens his or her eyes to painful stimuli. Ttie best way to do this is
to apply peripheral painful stimuli. Avoid central painful stimuli as it may
cause the patient to grimace.

1 = No response The patient's eyes remain dosed despite painful stimuli.

Best verbal response:

Tlie patient may have difficulty in speaking (dysphasia). If so, the letter 'D' should be recorded in the 'none' column. If the patient is
intubated then the letter T shouid be recorded in the 'none' column.

This indicates the patient's
orientation to time, place
and person
5 = Orientated The patient must be able to state his or her name, who he or she is, where
he or she is and the month of the year.
4 = Confused If the patient is able to hold a conversation but unable to answer the
questions above correctly he or she should be considered to be confused.
Correct wrongly answered questions, but change the order each time to avoid
the patient just repeating them.

3 = Inappropriate words The patient will use random vi/ords that make little sense or are out of
context, typically swearing and shouting. Painful stimuli may be required to
gain a response.

2 = Incomprehensible Tlie patient will only respond with moaning and groaning. Painful stimuli may
soLinds be required to gain a response.

1 = No response TTiere is no verbal response despite painful stimuli.

Best motor response:

If the patient is receiving medicines to maintain muscle paralysis Glasgow Coma Scale observations should not be performed.

Thisindicates brain 6 = Obeys commands Ask the patient to perform a couple of different movements such as sticking
function out his or her tongue or lifting his or her arm.

5 = Localises to pain Apply a central painful stimulus using one of the recommended methods
(Table 2), The patient should purposefully move the arm towards the site of
pain to remove the cause of pain.

4 = Withdraws from pain The patient will flex his or her arms in response to pain but will not move
towards the source of pain.

3 = Flexion to pain Tiie patient will flex his or her arms in response to pain but the wrist will also
rotate and the thumb may also flex and move across the fingers.

2 = Extension to pain Arms will straighten and the shoulder will rotate inwards when a painful stimulus
is applied. Tlie legs may also straighten with toes pointing downwards.

1 = No response There is no physical response despite painful stimuli.

(Shah 1999, Crawford and Guerrero 2004, Waterhouse 2005)

42 november 14 :: vol 22 no 10 :: 2007 NURSING STANDARD

Recording other measurements falling GCS are likely to be found before a change
in pupil response is observed. Altered pupils can
Vital signs The Royal Marsdcn Hospital Manual be a response to a number of things, for example,
of Clinical Nursing Procedures (Crawford and pin-point pupils could indicate opiate use or
Ciuerrcro 2004) recommends that vital signs metabolic disorders, a unilateral dilated pupil
should be recorded in the order of respiration, may indicate hrain herniation or raised ICP and
temperature, blood pressure and pulse (Table 3).
Raised intracranial pressure (ICP) will lower
respiratory rate and alter the respiratory pattern
(C'rawford and Guerrero 2004). This is one ofthe Evidence base for methods of painful stimuli
clearest indicators of hrain dysfunction. As Central painful stimuli
ICP rises pressure will be exerted on the
Method Action Evidence
hypnthalamus., the thermoregulatory part of the
brain, resulting in fluctuating temperature Trapezius pinch Using the thumb and Shah 1999. Woodrow
(Woodrow 2000). The brain becomes hypoxic or squeeze forefinger take hold of 2000, Mooney and
approximately 5cm of Comerford 2003,
and ischaemic and as a result systemic blood
the trapezius muscle Crawford and Guerrero
pressure rises in an attempt to perfuse the brain and twist. 2004, Waterhouse 2005,
(Shah 1999}. Patients will also become
Jaw pressure Apply pressure wittl the Woodward 1997a,
bradycardic; this is known as Gushing reflex
thumb to the jaw, just in Waterhouse 2005.
(Shab 1999, Crawford and Guerrero2004). Both front of the earlobe. This
increases and decreases in hlood glucose levels method should not be used
can occur in the patient with a head injury. if the patient has sustained
Hyperglycacmia increases cerebral ischaemia, any head or facial trauma.
reducing blood perfusion in the brain, and Supra-orbital Feel along the medial aspect Shah 1999, Woodrow
hypoglycaemia results in a lack of available pressure of the edge of the bone 2000, Mooney and
glucose to neurones which causes a reduction above the eye for a groove Comerford 2003,
or notch; apply pressure Crawford and Guerrero
in function (Woodrow 2000).
here with the thumb. This 2004, Waterhouse 2005.
Pupil response Assessment of pupillary activity method should not be used
is aiicsscntial part of neurological observation if the patient has sustained
and the only way to assess and monitor the any head or facial trauma.
neurological status of sedated patients Peripheral painful stimuli
(Watcrhciusf 2005). When examining pupil
Method Action Evidence
response it is important to position the patient so
that there is enough light to see the pupils clearly Lateral finger Using a pen apply pressure Waterhouse 2005.
but not so much lighr that the pupils constrict. or toe pressure to the lateral aspect of a
finger or toe. Rotate the
Pupils should he assessed for size, shape and
pen around the finger in
reaction to light (Table 4). Each pupil should be opposite direction to the
assessed and recorded individually. Pupils are nail. Tliis should be
measured in millimetres (normal range 2-6mm in performed for tio lotiger
diameter) and arc normally round in shape. A than ten seconds.
bright light., preferably a bright pen torch, should
he sht)ne into each eye to assess rhe pupil's
reaction to light.
Vital signs
Abnormal pupil size and response together
Observation Method
withotherneurological symptoms, such as a
reduced GCS and agitation, are an indication Respiration rate Record respiratory rate and rhythm or
pattern, observing for any decrease in rate
of raised ICP (Woodward 1997b). The anatomy
and altered rhythm or pattern.
of rhe skull means that any swelling or
space-occtipying lesion such as a bleed, Temperature Record and observe any increase in
temperature.
haemaroma or tumour, will raise ICP. If this
persists or rapidly worsens tbe brain tissue will Blood pressure and pulse Record together observing for any increase
shift and become compressed. As a result tbe in blood and pulse pressure and decrease in
pulse.
ocular motor nerve that controls pupil reaction
may be affected resulting in changes to pupil Blood g l u c o ^ Record and observe for any deviation from
responses. Sluggish or suddenly dilated pupils are normal parameters.
Lin indication of deterioration and require urgent Early warning score - a Record and observe for any deviation from
medical attention (Waterhouse 2005). This is physiological scoring system normal parameters.
why it is important to observe and record pupil with an identifiable trigger
threshold (Morgan et al 1997)
size and reaction (Woodward 1997b). Other
clinical indicators of deterioration such as a (Adapted from Crawford and Guerrero 2004)

NURSING STANDARD november 14 :: vol 22 no 10 :: 2007 4 3


art & science clinical skills: 25
fixed pupils may indicate severe mid-brain
damage nr poisoning (Iggulden 2006).
Limb movement Limb movements provide an
TABLE 4
Observation of pupil response
Observation Method
General Look at the shape of the pupils and their position. Is
observations there any eye disease or medication that impairs either
your view or the eyes' response to light?
Is the eye too swollen to open? Attempts should be made
to open a mildly swollen eye but if it is too painful or the
swelling is prolific tbe letter 'C for closed sbould be
recorded on the observation chart.
Does the patient have a false eye?
The size of the eye is measured in millimetres - a guide is
given on the side of most neLjralocjical observation charts
and some pen torches. Use this guide rather than
estimation so tbat the results are objective rather tban
subjective.
Record the size of the pupil at rest before any light is
shone into the eye.
Pupil response To check the pupil response, move an illuminated pen
; torch from the outer aspect of the eye directly over the
pupil. Tbe pupil should constrict quickly. The pupil should
dilate again when the bright light is moved away.
Both eyes should constrict when a light is shone into one
eye. This is called consensual reaction.
These reactions are recorded as {+) for reaction, (si) for
a sluggish reaction and (-) for no reaction.
(Adapted from Woodward i997b)
Observation of limb movement
Observation Result
Normal power Ttie patient will be able to push against
resistance with no difficulty.
Miid weakness The patient will be able to push against
resistance but will be easily overcome.
Severe weakness The patient will be able to move his or her limbs
independently but wil) be unable to move against
resistance.
Spastic flexion The patient's limbs will flex in response to painful
stimuli. Arms, vt^rists and possibly the thumb
will bend inwards. Legs will pull upwards.
Extension Tiie patient's limbs will extend in response to
painful stimuli. Elbows, Vi'rists and fingers Vi^ill
straighten stiffly down the side of the body.
Legs will stiffen and feet will point downwards.
No response There is no motor response despite central and
peripheral painful stimuli.
(Adapted from Woodward 1997c)
4 4 november 14 :: vol 22 no 10 :: 2007
accurate indication of brain function (Crawford
and Guerrero 2004). It is important to assess
and record each limb separately (Wnterhouse
2005). The observation chart should be marked
with the letter 'U for left limbs and the letter 'R'
for right Hmhs. Table 5 dciiioiistriucs the process
of limb observation.
Assessment of limb responses provides
information about motor function and is best
carried out when tbe patient is lying down
(Woodward 1997c). Any deficiencies in function
may indicate a developing weakness or loss of
movementcau.sed by raised ICP (Woodward
1997c, Shah 1999). Limb assessment also assists
tbe identification of local damage. Altbimgh it is
usual for a hemiparesis or hemiplegia to occur
on the opposite (contralateral) side to tbe lesion,
itmay occur on the same (ipsilateral}side,
known ns false localising. Particular
consideration shouid be given to any limb
weakness that may be tbe result of past medical
history, for example, stroke, where there may
be a difference in linib resistance, or general
frailty wbicb could influence the patient's ability
to offer resistance. It is important to use clinical
judgement as well as objective measurement,
remembering to record any difference in
resistance in each limb separately.
Accountability
Nurses are accountable and responsible for
providing optimum care for patients.
Tbe Nursing and Midwifery Council's (NMC)
Code of Conduct provides the main source of
Method
To determine whether the patient has normal power, mild
or severe weakness. Each limb is assessed and recorded
separately.
Arms - while holding the wrist ask tbe patient to pull you
towards him or her and then push you away.
Legs - holding the top of the ankle ask the patient to lift his
or her leg off the bed then holding the back of the ankle ask
the patient to pull the ieg towards him or her.
To determine a response of spastic flexion or extension apply
central painful stimuli. If no response is elicited use peripheral
painful stimulus.
NURSING STANDARD
professional accountability for nurses (NMC
2004). It lsfssfntial that nLirsinfisratt examine
objectively the information gathered from
assessments and observations as well as the
information previously recorded. Neurological
t)bservationscontrihiite to the overall patient
assessment, which then forms the basis tor the
individualised plan ofcare (Crouch and Meurier
2005). Nursingstaff should ensure that the
patient has an appropriate care plan in place and
know how and when to take action should a
change occur in the patient's condition.
Accurate record keeping and documentation
is important. The NMC (2007) states that the
quality of record keeping is also a reflection ofthe
standard ofthe individual's professional practice.
All records must be contemporaneous, accurate
and unamhiguous. Iris important always to act in
a way that safeguards the patient's best interests
and this Includes the prompt reporting of
abnormal findings when monitoring and
recordnig neurological observations. It is al.so
important to remember that observation charts,
while important, are only one of the many toois
available togather information regarding a
patient's condition. It is often useful to listen t(]
the patient's family or close friends when
carrying out neurological observations as they
can provide invaluable information about the
patient's normal state and can often give an
accurate history of the onset and symptoms. This
aware of relevant, credible research and ensure
that any patient care given is safe. Guidelines and
protocols should be in place in healthcare
organisations to ensure that care is in line with
best practice. Head injury guidance is available
from NICE (2003) and thJoH (2005b).
It is important to ensure best practice when
monitoring and recording neurological
observations. Box 1 presents a quick reminder
of factors that need to be considered.
Conclusion
Monitoring and recording neurological
observations that are reliable and accurate are
importantclinical skills. There are a number of
tools, including the CICS, which can be used to
perform neurological assessments. Nurses
should ensure that they are competent to
undertake these observations and use the tools
available to achieve the best outcomes for
patients. The importance of using clinical
judgement and taking appropriate action when
changes in the patient's neurological status occur
are paramount NS
Monitoring neurological observations: important factors
U5eall parts ., i ! > ' i

is important in situations where patients may not
be able to communicate their medical history.
Accountability also involves being up to date
with new developments, best practice and
ensuring consistency. Nurses should be fully
Record only what you see.
Listen to family members and friends.
Report any changes in ttie patient's condition.
Do not be influenced by previous observations.
Do not use nail-bed pressure or sternal rubs.

References

Alcock K, Clancy M, Crouch R
12002) Physiolocjicjl obscrvatioDS
of patient5 adniitted from A&E.
Nursing Standard 16, 34, 33-37
Crawford B, Guerrero D (2004)
Observations: neurological. In
Doiighertv U Lister S (Eds) The
Royal Marsden Hospital Manual of
Clinical Nursitig Procedures. Sixth
edition Blackwell Science, Oxford,
485495.
Oepartment of Health (2005b)
The National Service Framework for
Long-term Conditions. Tlie
Stationery Office, London.
Douglas G, Nicol F, Robertson C
(Edb) (2005) MacLeod'i. Clinical
Examination. Eleventh edition.
Clmrrhill Livingstone. London.
Iggulden H (2006) Care ofthe
Neurological Patient. Blackwell
Publishing, Oxford,
Excellence (2003) Head Itijury:
Triage. Assessment Investigation
and Early Management of Head
Injury in Infants, Children and
Adults. Clinical guideline 4. NICE.
London,
Nursing and Midwifery Council
(2004) The NMC Code of
Professional Conduct: Standards for
Conduct, Performance and Ethics.
NMC, London.
Walsh M (Ed) (2006) Nurse
Rivctitioners: Clinical Skills and
Rrofessional Issues. Second edition.
Biittei^woiih-Heinemann, Edinburgh.
Waterhouse C (2005) Tlie
Glasgow Coma Scale mii other
neurological observations. Nursing
Standard 19, 33, 56-64.
Woodrow P (2000) Head injuries;
acute care. Nursing Standard. 14,
35, 37-44,

Crouch A. Mciirier C (Eds) (2005)
Vital Notes for Nurses: Health
Assessment. Blackwell Publishing,
Oxford.
Oepartment of HealUi (2005a)
Quality Critical Care: Beyond
'Comprehensive Critical Care':
A Repoii by the Critical Care
Stakeholder Forum Tlie Stationery
Office, London.
Mooney GP, Comerford DM
(2003) Neurological otisprvations.
Nursing Times. 99.17, 24-25.
Morgan RJM, Williams F,
Wright MM (1997) All
early-warning scoring system for
detecting developing critical
illness. Clinical Intensive Care.
82,100-101,
National Institute for Clinical
Nursing and Midwifery Council
(2007) Recoid Keeping Guidolinvs.
NMC, London,
Shah S (1999) Neiirologic.il
i.i5sess/iie(it Nursing Standard. 13,
22, 49-54.
Teasdaie G, Jennett B (197'^)
Assessment of coma and impaired
consciousness: a practical scale. The
Lancet. 2. 7672. 81-84.
Woodward S (1997a) Neurological
observations: 1. Glasgow Coma
Scale. Nursing Times. 93, 45, SuppI
1-2.
Woodward S (1997b) Neurological
observations: 2. Pupii response,
Nursinci Times. 93, 46, SiippI 1-2.
Woodward S (1997c) Neurological
observations: 3. Limb responses.
Nursing Times. 93, 47 Siippl 1-2.

NURSING STANDARD novetnber 14 :: vol 22 no 10 :: 2007 45