Concept of prescription. is dtigg by he Civ Ce in Artic 166 is AE cing Cvmrhy sd Cr ral ih spite Batre wo cone sch ight hough the laps of ine Te Pecenption spss oownerp and thr meal igh TaPe rigs and aco of any Kind whatsoever Under the commen aw the word “preston” is eneally sed ih eerence 1 the sguton eight bythe lapse of Ma Naor example tat one may aque ight to eal froperty ort an eaten by pesrpion On the ther hand the word [Tinnliation as applied to actions under the common te Tornce rote ie within which an action must be ‘up afer the ight of acon has accrued Trnr the Civil Code the word prseription”isusdtncover Ete tan (Unie Stes ¥ Srp, 23 PL 54 (912, sath ocean's Okman de Leslion y Terspradends 08) Kinds of prescription {his lea from the coda definition thet there ane two kinds of prescription (0) SET REET] — This 1 dened in the fi paragraph of Article Ti It the acauistion of ownersup and ns (ae Art 7 dag the ppanger and under the gulions provided Py tat aso precunder the name of GEESE REST in common aw, OF find of possesion hv iinapporison othe tru title or eal amerscommenced without right bat ns time ‘Asa mode of acquisition, psc ofthe follwing element (@) capacity uf the daiman! wo acquire by prescription: (@) a thing capabie ot acyuisuion by prescription; (c) psecsion of the thing under certain conditions: and (4) lapse of time puns bg la: (National Power Core poration & Campos fr. 408 SCRA 194 [2003]) Mere possesion with a jucdical tie such as by a usufrudi- ciara tse a lessee, an agent, a pledge, not being in the fEncept ofan onner cannot pen ino ewnership by acquisitive fprociption unless the urd ation i jst expreslyrepud Sed and such repudiation has been comeranicated tothe other pany Eaguerca'. Mananan, S16 SCRA Sol (2007) This kind {Et prescription may be ondinary or extraordinary preseription faut whl that of extraordinary prescription i ight yeas and JePimmoables its unyeareand sy year, respectively Since the period of extraordinary prescription i wo times longer (88) tha ria morales and thee times one (GO10) than that for immovable, the periodof possession {goed faith should be computed twice or thrice, as the case may Be, when tacked othe pre of possession in bad fa |S Thus if ater six years of possession in good faith of rel ‘Property, the possession iecoveriad intorbad faith, the six yeas [Possession in good faith would be to eighteen yea> possession in bad faith. Hence, the ‘will need twee ‘vore years of possession fr extraordinary pres eraoedinary presripion- reverotion, tho foowiog rues shall be observed: © 1 pt ener may a pte / ad rerscurmon m mrp ere gh ‘necessary for preseiption by tacking his possession to {hat ot his grantor or predecessor in ntrest, (2) tis presumed thatthe present possessor who was ‘also the possessor sta provious ne, has continued tobe | possession during he intervening Ue, unl there ie bebo. the contrary: (2) The first day shall be excluded and the Last day Included. (19803) Computation of tine necessary ‘or prescription. (1) The present posse may tc his pric of posession with that of his grantor or predecessor in interest. The ule bse the hey thatthe Manstense acquires the sme Fgh and benefits a hone enjoyed by his transferor. This presupposes thatthe former dened hs poms rm theater suchas he possesion of aa heise AP 53) or wbuyer There must by pity of contractor relationship between the previous and present possessorserwie, the possession ofthe new ocrupant shoud be count only from the me it tctually began and cannot be lengthened by connecting it with the possesion ofthe former ‘South ity Homes, Ines Republi, 185 SCRA 6 [1950] So, a Mens. aBUer Is mat permite toad his to tat of any previous pomsessor. {ExeLacon « Government, 39 Phil 631 [1919] Razote Rezo, 4 Phi 182[1525}) (2) The,gresumption in the second paragraph ig pe Fe ‘The same i aki down in Amie 534 regarding continuity of possession (3) The thin paragraph follows the gener in Article 13 {par 30 hat “ge coping a pero the it day shal be cexcded and the ast day included —000—Chapter 3 PRESCRIPTION OF ACTIONS ‘An. 1130, Actions preribe by the mare lapse of ime teed by am (1969) Scope of Chapter Another tem for 4s “timation of ction which implies that actons fo enfore or preserve a igh ‘Sr claim must be bought within a certain period of ime. The seepectve periods of me within which various actions must te brought ave hnown a prescriptive periods” or “periods of Timitation” and the ere laws presenbing Such periods are ‘il "statute imitations.” Chapter 3 fives the pevids of prescription for all actions eB cx wine ioe pene povided in particlat son prescrption ound esewhere in the Civil Code or Inspec las which prevail over the provisions ofthis chapter. (am 1148) 1 is thus general statute of tations. thas ben held thatthe presciption of ations in the Civ ‘Code contemplates civil actions and pot cial actions. Raos + Pamaran, 60 SERA 327[1974)) The prescription ofan action and the acquisitive presriptio of ownership and other real righ (Chap. 2) are paoitfeent and disine things although eqs transcendent being of ident result and effect. (BargA¥O 8 Camumot 40 PR 857 [92 Vda. de Rigonan v Derecho, 463 SCRA 627 [205)) How actions proseibe. ‘As provided in Atle 199, actions prescribe by mere bps? = nyt tA {et tater the second paragraph of Article 1106, te ecm ss iste pemrmnasts eae 2 eee eran ee Sere reat) sep ras eens! shows that indeed the action has aleady prescrised. (National Setar ssayeeeniese im Sioa clad ict _dintersoettnig hemlet coins ere rctias Secwesteue ee ee lesmsatas Existence and accrual of cause of action! Tight action (0) Ina GaRETCDevs when the ollowing requisites are prsent Co)» right in fase ob paint by GERIEEREMeans and unos sate ait prises ors gate (6) an obligation om the part ofthe defendant such right and (©) anactor omission onthe partof such deendant vio- lative ofthe ight ofthe plait ‘Acause of action arises when that eich should have been done is not done, or that which should not.have been done is done. tis lo that deter- a eHNese cans nooner Ay : .nd Mortgage Bank sie “ = ci i rer achat pti which eau iin en bot G8 POD toe ap ni sei whch tle covlderaton for the we praise. “Renn 2 ska [10 OE : ce aa eae ee esd gi ie an 2 PrN ray ns Basar, Ins ited he ans eh ay se aia ee eins sel eet ion: (Solid Homes, li tavees the pocmsener kas Gepanee te monet by Sete acral of cus cf25 + Ine Tan Fonenar han mare comerhy by ‘erate 137 [200]) Simply pu, the crame oF ection ncrugy rescrpton for las perio, sccordng to article 1132, {oo SRA tment dhe beach wcaton of OF uty ecu ad ot retin ee previte ot rtan r Ceres { ct Seson Te fons tclvepeking is the righete commence ‘Action fo recover movables. | Sn ton taro from the cause action but As lt proves, Ari a et etree unt al the facts which constitute the cause of ETE ie Gece we sates oie peetione of | Sorte re ce Ml Rely Development Corp. Actes 152 and IED governing acuaive presciption ta Se Condominium Corp. 491 SCRA 9 [2006 Ae tip Bebe Calalo 535SCRA 8 [2007} So, one may have a cause of oS A ree renter Seton but withofrghtof acon Te two terms are often used Hetero. iheeeas tata pa recover is fixed at seegeeyay CE sem we gm igh ps. nrc: ena pape nao mn possessor has already acquired title Ordinary acquative by Effect of prescription liited to remedy, ese ar ee (an. 1132) ‘not existence of action. 0 re the movable in good-faith ccigan of ac eve SRE . owner cant cain t-return without EES Wig tee es repair accented igences lnc, 17 SCRA 176 [1966).) The certain caves, the owner is precluded from recovery SSL Renta’ | qaewrnierenencr mag monntemre dete eens eee Eby he promises rnerbed ce At 15, under Ad. 22B) Te Se ae (A) Movabls possessed through a rime canner Srey bncetaoce unit sagt ppny beste aS wencied (sen: new ise scar pede sTBtse P a Asthesantery ate thiy you prescribe en sets natn ery brs the remedy a de as ois vo wnate Tite hes something more hana mere seta ten condo of coma oa <1 te support a promise, to wit — a pre-existing ob ‘rights by prescription. (1963) Somacaile Sad cle rah Gr (Sa tees ‘Action to recover inmovables. oh | eee: AE ne pteare ‘on A anal ye ce het) action for recovery of title to, oF possession of, real me ” ‘Property or an interest therein can only be brought within ten™ connuents ANOCATEONTHOFEATY atin (10). years alter the cause of action accrues. (Arradaza ¥, Court of (arma Article 1141 refers to Enogerp le iption for ae cae meen cet sith matte hamden pBtemgrarsdete ane mn ng STSLIIRCT ty spin a cy aoa ee ot hee opec ofthe statutory period of 30 years of Sei rr Sapna ee {and automatically transforms ? tad vests ile on the possessor. (Cabuay, J: ¥ Malvar,389.SCRA 493 (20021) ‘Action for reconveyance. "An action far reconveyance of real property is a realaction ‘over-an immovable. (Lindaln v. Court of Appeals, 212 SCRA, S25 [1992]) Such action respects the decree of registration as Jinconwertible and merey-seeks the transfer of the property ‘Mrongfully or erroneously registered in the name of another tothe ane who cane fo have a bter right I the claimants Jn. possession of the disputed property 10 be reconveyed, Tor reconveyance for annulment of ttle) would be in the ature of an action to quiet tile which is imprescripible, (see ‘Art 476) Anaction for reconveyance based on a woid:contract is also tmprecriptible under Article 1410. An action to declare the Heels void enced xe agence iieatenston Gain acin rec on uud, and such discovery is dem te ners ee Te tg Sopa Lael oy ile x sore fet alge imac eptauon or date Se rae tk ove rope Gaver! See cron Setags ASC oS BOOT) The property must have £G7 yet passed to does innooent prc fr value Tie pana nin acta o he rp he aon sine bm uaceat tic prem erke aa) espe ome ~ suri AA HARA ay M2 Among con rsrs arin yor Action to foreclose mortgage. Wf the action or the oem of morgage eave & morgage db the same mat be ought win yes ah the tne the obligation sere bythe mortgage comes due tne demands tht om thee the maga dfs 9 the payment of his obligation to the mortgagee. () fthemongagewarexcatedin tvoro asury compe by the pina deta to sce he omer om iy Caer arerornanc br ote nr’ gr In ce of ma ment ofthe princi digas th eid of prestpion ean dae oan uty rn he en a that ite date wis TS gag cones TR o the mertgage andthe mortgage Decors suet to ores (ocean « Luzon Surety Co 101 Pi 1212(Unvep.1957)) () The apne f payments beyond the 1-year period of redempt Re tmongagece ei frm tating tha the pod fo rede the property had already expe there tt acton imply eran that the pans ely Intended the temacon tobe an eta morgage ce Ar Tez, 103 wor apa fake sr} Rey Jes Reyes (626 SCRA 758 [2010],) ) Ifthe acon to mover morgage debt has already prescribed he aciontorcever eine hereon asancceary Feat consequence int ao prescribe othe eves but an Incent f the principal and ives wal die with (Soriano v. Eniguen 24 PALS [1913)) (4) The fat hat morgage on land sant on the tithe reise owner doesnt mabe the acon oforecane itimprcrpble a agalnt he reseed cw What dos ot rte i (Se 47, Pee Decree HaJ529) the arantip oan unde te Tones Sper bakes or “ccutbrdcome econ suchas a morgage. The oly impertant Stectof the egisuaton ofa morgage sabia to bind hid patie, (Bahat Besar 500.6-4215 (19541)raorexty Ants snvotherie Ae 141. (Nae ee iy Banke IS SCRA 3 ED snore cers spec: a. 4, 1 tr liar. td i "samand vont wey rg ale 9; ws mame ae eo Poe see. tion rights nt extinguished by Prec ements ight Caner Ars 649, 8, ane Petcare ae > specie eee gn 7 oa Among actons that donot prescribe, amples sregivenbeow and poiton co-owners a long asthe ly ogra (A Aer mas sutiga, 92 Phil 350 [1953]) uw (CaP o demand easement of ight and view through obser Sit servient owner of distances for director oblique view: (ast 67, par 3) (9) Todecare the inexistence of a contract (Art. 1810.) or the uly ofa void adgment (Vda. de Macoy v. Court of Appeal, 206 SCRA 244 [1992], othe nullity ofa void title i fact such tithe is susceptible to diet as well as to collateral attack. (Feret + Bautista, 231 SCRA 2571994] To compel trustee to r-com ty restored is mame fr he nto the st que Ea ee Art 55 Lagu Levanto 71 Pil 46 [1985]) (5) To compel conveyance of land registered in bad faith [Provided it has ot yet passed tan innocent purchaser for val4® ‘Gdn Vi dela 10SCRA (1964) é \() Yo quit tte brought by a. person in the proper since his untae possession gives hitn Tease taht to seck the aid of a court of equity to d "atu olth adverse aim ofa third party andi effect * eam a bis title. (Calla Husain, 20 5c ton v.Gabat bite aH RA 186 [1967 Bacon ¥ Gabae, (7) To recover mal property ots value where the propety was taken by the government for public use without frst acquiring ttle therete (Goper v. Autor General, 20SCRA 655 fise7l) ( (8) To seek issuance of «writ of possession. (Lucero v maceae lina) ' toe (.9))To probate. wil. (Guovarra ¥. Guevarra, 74 Phil. 479 138) (10) To reaver (by the State) nom ana (Martinez ¥: Court of Appeals 56 SCRA 607 197s), suchas land which is part of the public forest or of forest reservation. (Palanca Republic SCRA 2009 [204]) Prescription, both acquisitive and extinctive, dong? run against the State (Art. 105(4],) in the,exercise ofits sovereign functions to interest (see Republic v. Hernaez, 31 SCRA 219 (1970) excep) with spect ios patsimonial papery which may be the on (Are 1113) ‘Art 1144 The following actions must be brought within ten yoars from the time te ight of action accrues: (/0)~) (1) Upon a wttien contract; (2) Upon an obligation created by laws {@) Upon ajedgment. (0) ‘Actions that prescribe inten yours aut smenonstieeatenstht precitelnten ear, sis the longest pera on prescription i he Civil Code ‘Provision is a law of feneral application and may pote invoked ‘where a special Jaw is applicable such asthe preseriptive period Fixed in Article 291 ofthe Labor Code with respect to elim Arising from employeremployee relations. (LQ University ‘Assn, MLO Educational Institution, Ine, 172SCRA57 1985; ‘Laureano v. Court of Appeals, 324 SCRA 414 [2000],) (0) Wate contracts. ~ thas boen hed thatsts PROPERTY arte cess AND jeortitubontesa: sl cette ee Ts [es 1 er =A AD, and orm fn Srey Co Repay 42 SCRA 131 (1975), Ve ‘far: Voluz, 24 SCRA 559 1968.) paescaibe in wan years, Bu, maton fora ein oe yar sencontaa aw oracheckis a writen contrat (ee on 8s SCRA 618 [1974]; Philippine Com. ay i de Pa cout of Appeals 250 SRA se hoa eke sued fr transportation (Perl de Guerrero x. Madrigal Shipping Co. 106 Phil 485 [1959}) {oThe igh toca peymentofdeficlncy after forecl- sure oral tate morgage prescribes inten Years under Ar- SUES ond 1a2- (Development Bank ofthe Philippines Tomelden, 11 SCRA 171 [1980}) {a Where under the terms ofthe contrat of sale, thebal- _ancbof the purchase pice must be paid by the buyer within {ara perio fom te signing thereat, and upon full pay: tent the sellers bound “to transfer, cede and convey” the property sold, the buyer's cause af action accrues from the Time of payment of the balance, (Vda. de Alvi v. Court of Appea 72 SCRA 7 183]) (©) Ail 1141) doesnot preclude instances when the agreement may not be found in one single document bt ‘wo or more separate writings related to each other which ‘when taken together contain all the elements of a contract {Board of Ligudators x. Ricma Trading Corporation. 2 ‘SCRA 371 [1969}) om, Sow FE Earn caine tt cs ebro thin far yen con Sine eats Wow tamale tat od wie asi nan ee Le) Rahal be bough? espn Ate ES vex no eptaion cna fle which ha pe the owen ofthe ot sl Pad ben cies are eee ve ayer naw oy Sekt comnply wath he tigation pv the full parchae price which fa was notable to do ear Fertecause te dod ose was yettobe eect by eon tf which he deemed i appropri to cepot he Blane in az eer So An ges SCRA Q) Obligations created by le. — Obligations may be derived eg TaVOAAS. 11571), 1158), such as: (1) Te higatona he poursrtomemeythe at ant re otery ung nas cancun oped ‘trust, feckoned from the date of the megistration of the deed “Aats, 1447, 1456,) An obligation under ar(impliedtrusiis one aie : (0) The obligation of weer na gambling game to slat te smote wotothelao (aS ( (¢ eblgtin ofthe ero indemniy te lesen shel dit or atl inpovemens on the poo sed fiat fem Cubange Cou of Appa 20) SCRA ald {1991}); and (€)Theciigen of haband on wie pred and ci- sn inetnend sun veppotens ote: be A ‘Se Fer Code)and rent, = Thaw weer 1 «figment a) 1nd Sine he Re of Cour he odgment SF Swine yer fon he dae of erry Ss bees nd td eer Afar the lee Sa tore ns bred byte eat of Uationy Cech ne byenary ston (le, Se. thee) vlan yous ‘ny inception ot day cculned by the Abtor wil bin hich erie action ay baad ‘The statute of limitations has been gevised to operate primarilyPy counanTs AND CASESON PROPERTY anes canoe sos who sponses TO gat he “Esta cms Hr sce Fe mer Corporation conto Appa ba Arse Cuter Lies Cou of ABs, 82 Ao Ge Bou Hef Dio 363 SCRA 2008) it sone that nally disposesof, adjucicates or dares the rights or some right oF rights of the partis, oe ee ene aren some defi ad separate Fan ach ema thm un itis revered or meme. (Gold City Integrated Port Services, Lc. .Intermectate ‘Appellate Court, 171 SCRA 57 [1989]) Tt becomes AEP hereiore execution shall issue asa matter of right, upon ‘the expiration of the period Yo appeal therefrom if no appeal has ‘bem cally perected. (Rules of Court, Rule 39, See. 1.) Computation of peradot prescription. “The computation ofthe period of prescription oFny cause cc ght afocn wich tesane atte soe oud tt da meee con te ese ape po clare ve Iyent ped inde ast dtc oberon foe ha ne which sna recep te ct of exciton ofthe contact {Rags Rope Coe Gout of Appeals 30 SCRA SS fis) (Qu The KacnualaLTiightalactiod refers to the cause of hich dete sth ator omion By Which party Vilas the right of mother. The griod of prescription commences bis te date ote contr bt ‘eau fal (Anpig Sev api SOSSCRA 12006]; see Art. 1155; see distinction between cause of action and right of action, under Art. 1139.) ‘an 14s, violet (Berg etons mut be commenced Oommantcomes rene} Cpmacueatcontast (a) loccareerst nein rscurnon - rari a ‘Actions that prescribe in sx years. [0 dct gon nlc aD cmp te siete of ear oes ander he poe Cage Adame, 10 SCRA 645 [1964] ) ane ie] Th id fr preipion to move TE collected sox years upon a quast-contrast (Municipality ‘of Opon v. Caltex [Phils], Inc, 22 SCRA 735 [1968).) As to qua: contracts, see Articles 242 ey, ‘Ar. 1148. The following actions must be instituted witha four years: (1) Upon an injury tothe rights ofthe pati; (2) Upon a quash-dolict(n) Acton that presse in four yar. "Ati 146 spat f “injury othe rights ofthe pai” and "quae hich are the Specie ya ncmencatures fr tet clan v Court of Apps 195CRA 35 [191]) (0) The purpose ofan action or ut an the aw to govern i ncaing perc of presen ob deermined rot Sy lat of te port lng the cor, made im his argument CETL eae rar bythe complain ill 1 llgations and stapes for mld. Thox 2 sul gusting pttore’s removal eer seeery i mot mcemarly ce of rao Sc Ter purpe altogh tals seks restatement to aok ee Parrecount a such removal Cray the one a he Rakes f Cour (le 6, See. 1 there) Trane tick peti for uo terran should be led, counted cael doesnot apy. The acon mst be tn for years ccrdance wih Arie La). for Pere ed caactn trom employment Sal dismissal Cereeate ngs fhe lan (De Tavera hlippine ‘Tuberculosis Society, Inc, 112 SCRA 243 [1982]; Valencia v. Cebu Parra Ce 16 Fhi, 722199] Nemenzow Saban, BS SCIA be Rone Foods In. National Labor Relaons ‘Commission, 249 SCRA 379 [1995],)\onMENTS AND.CASESCN PROPERTY 2) One's employment of profession i> 8 property right within the protection ofthe constitution guarantee of duc ot ae Clery er when one is acbtanly deprived of iam or means of tvelnood the ation to conten the kya of cme’ dismissal constitutes, in eens. an ation Pra ttponanijury to his rghts Where there was no cismisal. but tere suspension of work asa result ofthe suspension of one's Aner Hewee dae ¢ od sap the cause faction acer ‘when the Jemand or rnaaerent seategoalls EES) by theemplyer taliwag Tans In. Ope TTSCRA P0190. ‘exon Manufacturing. ills, 427 SCRA 377 [204)) (3) A complaint founded on an illegal-disenissal is not an ondinary money csim but one for GSE Being in he actin may be bough within fourt years rom dismal pura Article 114, (Nev us ‘Vamber «National Labor Relations Cammiion, 21 SCRA 88? lise3}) (4) Similar the action for recovery of damages fogtaking cx retaining peronal property or incon ogtespass upon rea state prescribes within four years ave De Bagh ingsor 9 Fi [1953 Oriental Commercial Co. Ine ¥ Joie. te APL 25 [190 Gapac vy Uy 101 Pal 1213 [Unrep. 19571) (5) On quasi-delics, se Article 2176 ej The prescriptive ‘en oni from th day te action maybe ecg ek treats trom the day quasi ccrurted or was eammuted I? has been held that an action against the Cental Bank for “tortious interferons” that isin cloning and iuldating «bane prescribes in four years rom the date of closure (Aled any orp Cust of Appeals 178SCRA 326 199) Tan Court of Appeals supra) ‘The running of the prescriptive period is nt interrupted thetlngofactninal comp where the coca goa delict ts fled as a distinct and separate action aide of the pial actin. (ae At 32,334 Se. 3. Rule 1, Rules of Te ic ana: oc pas eri aban ® mone Frascernon ™ renpen com (2) to evoke or rece a danation based on the beth, ape pearance, oradaption of child (Art. 763): (©) to revoke a donation based x ion Somplane with 2 condition (Att 764) (6) to escind #eomeact (Art 1389) and (4) to anmata contrat (Art 191.) ‘An. 1147. The following setions must be Mle within one year (1) Fo orcible entry and detainer, (2) For detomation.() ‘Actions that prescribe in one year ortess, (1) Aside from the eo ations above. other actions that prescient SeRtunder the Cri Code ncude actions (a) to rcoverpememsionie LAN. SSE): rewwke 2 donation che ground of ingle) (ane769): (6) to rescind or recover damages if immovable is sold with fe sereitude (Art. 1540, pars. 3, o (0 ek sles agent extant Y Acne desl ere the pice al se a np orsiaaheeor unable ca retin tec An 158) ce where See icons hm come vendor unable Se ded win bunds mond n see Ne se) pce nem 10 6) These pd peed Sor cons so ca ae inten dees or cncmbrans Spon the ngs 571) Co the ner condo the fa odes of™ ‘conse AND CASES ON FROM natty animate soi must be brought within fa from the date og heir dlivery tothe vende (AP 1577) ‘Atile 148i iilr to Arce 1115. ‘The provisions of Tile V on Prescription have suppletory applestoe Yo ape cases of prescription found elsewhere athe Ceil Cade and in special laws, For example, under the Carnage of Goods by Sea Act (C-A. No. 65.) which, a a special fou pails over the general provisions of the Civil Code tn ptseription of actions, the period for Bling suit for los o¢ ‘Tamage of goods i within Gne CI yea after the delivery of the foods o the date when the goods should have been delivered EMtartime Agencies Services, inc - Court of Appeals, 187 SCRA 346 (19%) ‘An. 1143. All other actions whose periods are not fixed In this Code o in othor law must be brought within five) yaar rom the time the right of action accrues. (n) ‘Where periods of other actions not fixed inthe Chl Code and in otter laws. Allacons ulessanenceptionisprovided, haveapresriptive rind, Unis the lay maken an acon imprescrptble. i Subject toby prscption We th pera oa. the cians trough ithe yea Pom the ime height faction acer Theil of acter eruseoseton sree nmin crnision of ana bya party in violation of 8 2 roth iho antes sential ements a ‘4 person (obliges); (2) a correlative obligation om the pat of anaber (blir and (3) an act omission I ue mec Pern De ” esr ectei Nea SE atc Se Se omc toi 2BSCRA M41 (1968) me Tain ha tp pees a5 sss ap er cease Ta a eat Coo ee action 4€Grues, and the action from that mement an be epaly pogegemb ern oben ctr Stk oer ae ete re er ee ‘Art. 1150. The time for prescription forall kinds of ‘actions, when there ls no special proviion which ordaine ‘otherwise, shall be counted from the dayithey may be ‘brought (1988) vine prod ob cout em dy efon mayb brug ‘The sing yi or ug te pi the ey when toe egal ta ol fe ton bee els Be Sheet pen teapot barging he tare dermis he wag Ft oe cnpton a tn eT Cro Ape in eS ep Maka Tn Conor Cp. sca 308) Foe " yun ac bona quai ovr y Ae eae ee eh atone en pene USDef th Ci cepa tortie ye erases Sve sant we ep aing, SCRA pe oot pn omy Ln nese ea stein 2 ae a a en ec erly ee“eenntents ANG CASESONROXTRTY saion Where the fended SARIS Ns eh so Oa he ete a drng te every of he 2 et er nng of the posed PESTON tary minal ation Tusrraiamis mace up he tne the Gi to un om th die menue Garo w Engi SCRA 77 ins scxy te for an amount payable in en ana rt to pani aust ation Le ac em Sea fats Begins 0 Tun 98 to each i aliments te dat He cet could sue the aaa te prsepve prod courte from the ds ec eT Penh ovine v Ub, 1 SCRA 36 [1961] {© The pesiptiv pred within which o bring an action toad anear mit 2 uel or tious writen deed of eA whee the alegad vendecr make hnoven th Intention by ovgst.ats note abide by the true nt starts ly from ‘anda, the (algal exeslion otthe-conira®. (Tormon v. Cutanda, 9 SCRA 698 1963) (6) spa rare pid for ation sci Cees fn implied tet ihm 17-79 tener (Ar LAH = trom the ltabishment ofthe theron of acon cory e-from the me the tpnsaton acing the propery ma or dat te eyes ot le Bat this ule tent pat Sonn gas of the propery st 2 pron caiming Be he oer inca possession ofthe bret high osack mangvane which in fect sek sce pope as "Belandero» Court Appeals 27 SCRA eis of fue Oligav Court Appeals 227SCRA 3011953), Kees oteigay Cour (Under Ati 1150, the ow! period of-preeiption of any sn chon cl om the date ens oo ‘aren case of son ares when that which shold Chop t done eth hich soul matte et SOEate Tes ina case fei eanwiment of aoa cont anata nate of hearst ate was held spon ine thatthe cone of action _ statement of acount showings sate of rcp ofthe {Banco Filipino Savings nd = ao ire. lanes iin Sans and Mortgage Bak Cot Apa An. 1181. The tine for which have er thelr eject tbe erento sakgrSoan {0 par orincipal wit) eres any ron om feast Baymont ofthe sny oe emer 876) Obligation o pay principal wihintarest "or annuity. If the eOGERDH the actions oer such the pest pescipan sina wee sesc> Bap, trom the as payment alte inet ox analy. Bat i te“ SOE debe isnt yet du, hefayment of irterst or annuity will "~"Y fan the runing ofthe grin which wil begin oly fem pe late of matty of he Sab. aes, “has i he maturity date ofthe deb September 3, bt he last payment of intrest December 30; the period begin from December 3 but the inet pi July 3, the period runs Oop Taam September 3. The payment of interest afer Maun orth cb howe that the dior recognizes the existence ofthe {ube ce Obra Pass Dever Ignacio, 17 Phi 5 (910}) Ties been held however, that Article 151 rms tine where payment of whic se a (Site cr the peat pred begins oun fom “the a; Ennai onal the interest” Philippine Naonal Babe Cour Appeal 2# SCRA 964 [198]) ‘he period for prescription of scons to ena he frien of obligation declared by 8 80, nd te ern the tne the Judgment BAESM® haters) ‘Obligations declared by a judgment. The period of prep of actos to demand inet 0 Be een rom the ie hedge Recs finalmo CONMEESTS AND CASESCN FROPEETY aaitig (2) An action for revival of iis governed by Article 1144(3) Article 1182 and Section 6, Rule 39 of the Rules of Cour, Under Sextion 6 the prev ‘aan have a final ang ing « pomnteneeuedasaimater of ightby ere motion hii yo ne di nt. sare ‘Alter the Cee sen aes tid pigment reuced to right of ee, BS OTR Dauber ty te istton of complaint is fron the time the Judgment thea ina vies Garman Management and Serves, ine Git No. 1537, Aug. 62010) (2) The teneyear prescriptive period within which aajcgznent comments fo run fom the date of fnalty of Jelgment and ot trom the expiration of therafier hin whith the jdgnent may be enforced by{ mee moo ippine Nation Bank Delos, 32SCRA 289[1970]) (3) A revved judgment may itll be revived. An. action to enone» revived judgment prescribes in JER from the {at the resin fdgment becomes fal not fom the date the ral gre ben ra The en a get fendered on complaint forthe revival of previous odgmen, tc the igh he plait mat on the new Judgment, ton the previous one. (Plippine National Bank . Bondo, 14 SCRA 770 (1965),) a ‘At. 1153. The period for prescription of actions to demand accountng runs from the day the persons who ‘should render the same cease In thelr functions. The petiod for the action arising from ot the accounting runs from the date when was. (@cognized by agreamant of the interested partes. (1972) npn stn — At ed ay nse mc eat ane aa F ogmene fire, 2 below it i barred | seatate of UimitaBioos STDS esi ey ceo ee a 5) etions to demand ‘sing tom rosa of re mccunng Inthe cae he pind should render te som te date pera wo Sarena ne de the secounting should fs-ben nda an wife et cas tom edt taps was eons byapeoeta interested prin Thee i no diene een ston for sconing snd liquidation sn: bath inv the determination sent tment what nde partes unr a co ‘v Duran, 1 SCRA 508 [1961|) e mae ILLUSTRATIVE CASE: “There exists muta open and caret cunt eee he pate consisting of recip demands Facts: In 1910, X menigaged to ¥ his sugar plantation for P15,00.0. Therese ¥ advance Xrom tne He sums of “money while X delved wig to ¥. The lst money advanced © X was on aly 301918 The at delivery of sugar to ¥ was On MOY 30,1918. Hence, we have an open mata current account eseren the plaintif andthe defendant commencing on Octaber 14, 1910 {mwhich debits and credits were made om month to month and from year to year downloand inca May 30, 191% the date fl the lat eri and Jy 3,198, which was the date ofthe ast Sebi all of which wasin te lifetime of X. Plainifisthesuccesorof while defendatsthe administer of the etate of the deceased X, Plantif ecks to extabish its ti vhs aed presi 1 the areas sown ai aerate en opr Oecer i 16 rou Whether rota of plinifcin prior to Orta 191 Ste Stn ote Cet Sl Pes? Whee these 4 mutual, ope a cent acount tM esproal demands. the gee ei thatthe “tog fee te balance deemed acu the at of SEB ea ped and ht the stat of mation rue fom, tbe Ft nm on ithe ie ch cru aor tains f sl all the athe temsnm COnDMENTS ANDCASS ON FROPIRTY con em agoiat the ast 0 matter how ted only ne the statu ar op & Co Laps Vi. far back the accu Pater 1926 cng SC. 868) uring wich the obliges was rom enforcing his ight An. 1184. The yeeros ee m= foam (9) ‘Where obliges provented by fortuitous ‘ent om enforcing nh. ‘Atcle 1154 is similar to Article 1136. The feneral rules that theexistence oa fortuitous event relieves the obligor trom {itty that might otherwise arisen the breach fan oigation ron ange inhale to exercise aright that might Shhonwiscovetitte a waver f said ight ee Art. 1178) Hence, the time covered by fortuitous event is notreckoned against the ‘blige i te computation ofthe period of prescription. (0) The fortuitous event should havegfevented the smite fom enrsing his ght. Thus, while gr may be considered of the war willfggl be _ Besse dartonatheinterpion ofpreiption ause the pmecripie pstind is doses! suspended by war o wach an extent at the cougar closed and are (Sob Skaukesmah athe people. ce Espana Lucio, 9 PLA TISC7:Quiambao v. Manila Motor Co. Ine. 3 SCRA 44 [1961] Tan. Courtat Appeals, 195SCRA 355 1991] 12) thann be sad os fseeaTaTDhat the period during which authoritarian rule was ia fore in the Philippines from September 21,1972 through February 25, 186 when the Aang government took power, particularly the period of martial la dn he cto tipi he ring of the prescrip eriods The matter should be decided an case-to-nte basis. Fot ‘arial law tobe treated adoree majeure that tolled the period of Prescription, a party must show that during martial law, he w 8 {2 crastand that it was imposible for him to com or even. rest an action, (Development Bank of the ix Pandas 28 SCAT [i] “en has been held that a cout hee court onder deferring action of on of jcgment suspended the running ofthe 5-72 ad a . pat fr ecto of ude Om 5 91 Te pd dng wed epee es Ea ene inna a Sa ced in comping th ecg yo pitomaie eee oe (4) ‘The sscriptive Period to institute famclosuse proceed byamorigagee bank wa rhen the bak wou piced under ivr ty be Ce ba ease Fahton fom ean snes sctento onset Us force majeure. AREER is part ofa bank's business activity Ge Sg Bk of Sp " Art. 1155/-The prescription of actions is swvontney ale Str cor, er f prvoleal dona by he sano, tnd wean ae Cany written acknowledgment of the debt by the debtor. (ora) Interruption of prescription of ctons. The prescription ao actions ntruped in anyotth vee cone stb i Arce 1 The sear ta he period of erin run anew and wher ine ation Paes er ey pd mn he acral the ce igh sey ned aden ntieasous 1 des nt wan tie peer wl at run anymore. Cipine Se Asc Nabona aor Klas Commision 177 SCRA O11) he ete of he nrrapton 4 wipe the paid hat The eect make he po ene fe he oe ae (Ledesma v. Court of Appeals, 224 SCRA ‘pe oat co Menna Gaia, 509 SCRA 4126) 1) Filingofanacn court — Wisner tate action 0 A the eration of the application pes deemed commence irom the date of volte complat withthe Check of Cour eg aking ito acount he ssa SSS Se Cabresv Tana, SCRA SH [SH Te cmm™ CONDENS ANDICASES ON TROPERTY peer eatin comin tee tn = este Fs annie ne ow ny aot ate Sica emer aye pane e cecennimas seta " interruption lasts during the pendency of the ac ~ sf guldatrs ¥ Zhela 15 SCRA S48 [1982)) FR ute for he prescription must be reckoned from the ensation of the fterruption. (Fforendo ¥: Organo, 90 Phi ‘GO T0951) Ineomputing the uaing ofthe prescriptive pe ow, the tone that bas andy else poe the fling of Thbrequent ction should be deducted fron the full period ‘eter which the proper action shouldbe ied. Fallon Ins hor Cory Mauls Raoad Co, 21 SCRA 974 (1967]) (4) I the plans eset from prosecuting the action to its fal conclusion the fling ofthe ation will not opezate to say the running of he period. ander v.Jader, 90 Ph £73 Unrep 1952 Oriental Commercial Co. ¥.Jureedin Inc, 71 Pal 251940) The acson is deemed abandoned and 3s {1 has never ben insted. (Arboso v. Andrade, 87 Pil [1950] ts demise or vohantary abandonment bythe plain tiff leaves ta parties in exec the same positon as though 10 action had been commenced at all (Intercontinental Broadcasting Corp. v. Panganiban, 514 SCRA 404 [2007]) (2) Whiten extruded by he creditor. — The demand ‘rast be ine and made Gein the expication ofthe period rylaw: writen extrajudicial demand wipes out the period thathas already elapsed and stars anew the prescriptive period {he Crees kt Man Gees 34 SCRA SOV) (a) A petition o open an adsnstration proceeding o¥et the ett ofa deceased deton evenBbrougit by the eed ta does ‘of an action igentorce the deb and hertre, oscon foredose a mortgage. (Oeelopment Bank of the Phil” Pines v. Ozarraga, 14 SCRA 653 {1965],) pas = Petra Ne » (©) A writen exe etter wil Bert epg eS, Bank v Crespo, 28 5CRA 3 (1069) PIM National (6) Ai 139. the Civ Coe states tha “contracts es thalfcrdae> actin i cour OED they ar anal by are ‘ade tomy oxryical ‘scotland toc See Arti 35 nn be wel Bee fetes ie ora dr pe ani ext hs qd end il ‘interrupt the prescription of the action for annulment. Int snot of en ersting sation: he pry eran 2 -nulment cannot be considered a creditor, and Article 1155 is peter, Mate Coto Arps S4SCRA TS (2) Wien ackelgmet of te dt bythe dtr — Not all acts of acknowledgment ol «dt inter Produce uch ee. he acknowledgment mist So that payment. pata by-the payor, would not Jntorrupt the running ofthe period of prescription (Philip National Bank w- Oscte, 24 SCRA 63 tise) (0) Aten ter of pymer wk el ot cnigtion em (ce Pt Nato! Banks Hip, 13SCRA20 09851) (0) Aloteradnowedging wp of demande fr the gavment a andthe sme ie oe aaenon tate ene eing of the prescrip peo forthe Bae. ope csue proceedings. (Ai 112) bythe cretor- sate fe en Court of Appeals 215SCRA 25 192)) has lapis (@) A partial pen the period ide Fate prized under the old Civil Code. However our Presen Cei Code requires that ticnomegmert i Bw necupt prescription gust be wen unlike dhe ol™ connar ANDCASESON PROPERTY Ans Civil Code which narsaDrequee« wei: Hones the egal Irpostiy of cnsiering payment 2 ackrowieement is copepecnae (lippne National Bar, are appeals 2 SCRA 94 [1969}) But the payment of Tae mapanomee of prescription ready obtained. (ce At. 1112) don wine eommaricaton 10 the morgage by the ay a he tpn morgage ein autho oe Tere fe rane oun of te morgage ga Ser OTE tn agaion which ha et of ferupting the peso of Serene Goan of appes.22SCRA 125 (1953)) Abpea to compromise # st upon 2 supposed aR A sion ha anying is dup and cana be ced once iden pat he deendant. (Lichauenv. Linx Sain) The ln does BY gue tat the ackauedgment made incuing boxe tn order tatu the(oreserip ot 00— INDEX Ad nein Appoint 25808 fanaa a ines agin pert gry rk Asqat of epate pnts ogc 3 ‘Seg deneng occ pd pone 7-1 testi determing vaio epton Adminisetveleungs wee plate 39 Aaminattve a3 ‘state Regn me, 18 eral Doman ‘endive ede inte proclamation 21 “ferences with panon” 257 Amparo (Wei), 35, 382553, ‘contents, 346 ert return by respondent 347 prohibited plsdings 88 of ei 3 eonstitatonal bast, 53354 Special features 35357 Ancestral Land, 121 ‘Andres Bonifacio, Pape end natn of poe. 266 tepular and a erin 257 2 proces Timitations, 24 clasifiation Appropriation Bil 116228