Professional Documents
Culture Documents
','
Carrie Neighbors
Defendant [I] / Pro Se Litigant
1104 Andover
Lawrence, Kansas 66049
(785) 842-2785
Plaintiff,
Defendant 1,
GUY M. NEIGHBORS
Defendant 2,
COMES NOW on this N d a y of July 2010, the Defendant [1], Carrie Neighbors,
acting as a pro se litigant, is requesting the court order any and all future mailing by the U.S.
Attorney's office be checked for errors prior to mailing, by Judge Murgia's court clerk.
1). The U.S. Attorney seems to be having a problem with getting the Defendant [I]'s name
and address correct on her recent mailings and this is causing undue delay and the potential of
Prejudice. Whereby giving rise to the appearance of an abuse of discretion and interference with
2). The Defendant would also notify the court that a second certified mailing perhaps from
the U.S. Attorney's office sent to Defendant [1] via certified mail, has now become
undeliverable and the card appears to have been originally addressed to 1144 Andover, then
changed to 1104 with scribbles over said number. (See attachment 2.)
3). This certified mailing is currently missing. The Lawrence Kansas Vermont street Post
office is currently attempting to locate this mailing and will notify Defendant [1] iffound.
4). There are currently two pending sealed motions by the U.S. Attorney Marietta Parker
which Defendant [1] conveniently has not received, has no access to on the Pacer site, and has
5). Defendant [1] requests that the court also order all future mailings in this cause of
action from the U.S. Attorney's office, Kansas District Court, be sent to the Defendant at her
business address which is her daytime address and thus will allow her to sign for any certified
Intentionally mailing the Defendant necessary court documents to the wrong address gives
the appearance by the Government of an abuse of discretion and interference with the judicial
process. An abuse of discretion standard of review is applied in [960 F2d 150 Taylor v. Warren
County Regional Jail] "plaintiffstated that he was unable to respond to the motions to dismiss
or the magistrate judge's reports because his mail was sent to the wrong address" See Ref
Meade v. Grubbs, 841 F2d 1512,1522 (lOth Cir.1988). "In reviewing such a dismissal, three
factors are considered: 1) the degree ofactual prejudice to the defendant; 2) the amount of
interference with the judicial process; and 3) the culpability ofthe litigant. DeBardeleben, 937
THEREFORE the Defendant [1], Carrie Neighbors, acting as a pro se litigant, is requesting the
court order any and all future mailing by the U.S. Attorney's office be checked for errors prior to
mailing, by Judge Murgia's court clerk and also sent to the Defendant [l]'s daytime Business
address.
Car . rs
Defendant [1] / Pro Se Li gant
1104 Andover
Lawrence, Kansas 66049
(785) 842-2785
111J!
11 1 'H l' "l''1111! II/n,! 1/ f/'11' I,ll' IhI,tiP/II
Case 2:07-cr-20073-CM Document 186 Filed 07/12/10 Page 5 of 6
Case 2:07-cr-20073-CM Document 186 Filed 07/12/10 Page 6 of 6
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
The undersigned also hereby certifies that a true and correct copy of the foregoing
document in the above captioned matter was deposited in the United States mail, first class
postage prepaid, addressed to:
Cheryl A Pilate
Melanie Morgan LLC
Defendant [2J counsel ofrecord
142 Cherry
olathe, Kansas 66061
Marietta Parker
Terra Morehead
U.S. Attorneys
500 State Ave.
Suite 360
Kansas City, KS 66101
itigant