Program

Evaluation Tool

Each goal of Stonebridge Academy Math Services has a measurable objective. Use
the rubric to rate the effectiveness of SAMS in meeting each goal.



The first goal of Stonebridge Academy Math Services is to improve
students math related self-efficacies in first through eighth grade tutoring
participants.

The first objective of Stonebridge Academy Math Services is that at least 90% of
tutoring participants will self-report more positive attitudes toward math and their
capabilities in math by the end of the school year as measured by surveys given
once each academic quarter.


Working toward
Fails to meet
Exceeds expectations Meets expectations meeting
expectations
expectations

More than 90% of 90% of tutoring Between 50% and Fewer than 50% of
tutoring participants participants had a 89% of tutoring tutoring participants
had a higher attitude higher attitude survey participants had a had a higher attitude
survey score at the end score at the end of the higher attitude survey survey score at the
of the school year school year compared score at the end of the end of the school year
compared to their to their attitude school year compared compared to their
attitude survey score survey score taken to their attitude attitude survey score
taken when they began when they began survey score taken taken when they
tutoring. tutoring services. when they began began tutoring
tutoring services. services.


The second goal of Stonebridge Academy Math Services is to improve the

math scores of first through eighth grade tutoring participants.

The second objective of Stonebridge Academy Math Services is that at least 95% of
tutoring participants math grades will increase from the grade they had when they
began tutoring, and that at least 90% of tutoring participants pass math with a
70% or better on their final report card.


Working toward Fails to meet
Exceeds expectations Meets expectations
meeting expectations expectations

More than 95% of 95% of tutoring 50% to 94% of Fewer than 50% of
tutoring participants participants have a tutoring participants tutoring participants
have a higher grade in higher grade in math have a higher grade in have a higher grade in
math on their final on their final report math on their final math on their final
report card compared card compared to the report card compared report card compared
to the math grade they math grade they had to the math grade they to the math grade they
had when they began when they began had when they began had when they began
tutoring. More than tutoring. 90% of tutoring. 50% to 89% tutoring. Fewer than
90% of tutoring tutoring participants of tutoring 50% of tutoring
participants have a have a 70% or better participants have a participants have a
70% or better in math in math on their final 70% or better in math 70% or better in math
on their final report report card. on their final report on their final report
card. card. card.

The third goal of Stonebridge Academy Math Services is to improve the

ACT and SAT math scores of middle and high school workshop participants.

The third objective of Stonebridge Academy Math Services is to raise ACT math
scores by at least 5%, or raise SAT math scores by at least 2%, for at least 75% of
workshop participants as submitted by participants and measured by pre and post
practice tests.


Working toward Fails to meet
Exceeds expectations Meets expectations
meeting expectations expectations

More than 75% of 75% of workshop 10% to 74% of Less than 10% of
workshop participants participants reported a workshop participants workshop participants
reported a 5% or 5% or better increase reported a 5% or reported a 5% or
better increase in their in their ACT scores or better increase in their better increase in their
ACT scores or a 2% or a 2% or better ACT scores or a 2% or ACT scores or a 2% or
better increase in SAT increase in SAT scores. better increase in SAT better increase in SAT
scores. scores. scores.
 Use the Scale to assess the overall effectiveness of Stonebridge Academy Math
Services.


Objective Ratings Reported Success Level of SAMS Looking Forward

Every objective was rated either The program succeeded in How can the program be
exceeds expectations or meeting its goals. expanded to reach more
meets expectations participants?
One or two objectives were The program succeeded in Do the objectives need to be
rated working toward meeting meeting some goals, but not all. adjusted to be reasonable?
expectations It made a positive impact on
the target communities.
Every objective was rated The program did not succeed Do the objectives need to be
working toward meeting in meeting its goals, but it adjusted to be reasonable?
expectations or up to two made a positive impact on the What other improvements
objectives were rated fails to target communities. need to be made to make the
meet expectations. program worthwhile?
Every objective was rated fails The program failed to meet its Reassess the program. Is it
to meet expectations. goals. designed to meet the target
goals and objectives? Are the
objectives reasonable? What
other improvements are
required to make the program
worthwhile?