Professional Documents
Culture Documents
OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this research was to understand the roles of family members in dialysis care and to
identify information gaps that renal professionals and organizations can address to better meet family member
needs.
METHODS: Twelve triads were conducted with 41 family members. Triads explored caregiving roles and chal-
lenges, sources of dialysis information, and information needs across stages of dialysis care and a range of topics
related to dialysis.
RESULTS: Resources and guidance for nutrition management was the most frequently reported information need. It
was also the most common challenge and the role family members most frequently experienced with dialysis care.
Other roles included providing emotional support, medication management, and transportation. Results also sug-
gested that the information needs of family members may change over time. Stages included: (1) understanding the
patients diagnosis; (2) managing dialysis and its effects; and (3) understanding the long-term effects of dialysis.
DISCUSSION: Family members information needs parallel the roles they play in caring for the patient, and these
needs can change over time. Renal providers and professionals should acknowledge and address these needs of
family members, whether they are new to dialysis or have years of experience. Informational materials tailored to
or distributed during different stages of dialysis and greater access to family-member support opportunities are
likely to be beneficial.
W
ith end-stage renal disease ing with aspects of personal care such as about kidney disease and to be provided
(ESRD), many factors that medication management, meal preparation, with ideas for ways they could enhance
affect patient outcomes occur and activities of daily living.2 their roles to best help the patients for
outside the formal medical Results from a national survey sug- whom they were caregiving.1,5
care system and in the home environment, gested that the most common challenges of Our study was part of an evaluation of the
such as medication adherence, diet and caregivers are finding time for themselves, Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services
fluid restrictions, and making arrangements managing stress, and balancing work and Dialysis Facility Compare (DFC) Web site
for consistent attendance at dialysis treat- family responsibilities.2 In addition, 20% tool, which was launched in January 2001
ment appointments.1 In the dialysis facility, of caregivers said they need help talking on www.medicare.gov/dialysis. Previous
renal care professionals are responsible for with healthcare professionals and find- research indicated that family members saw
monitoring the care of patients, but in the ing activities to do with the person they the resources currently on DFC as respond-
home family members often assume this care for.2 Depending on the intensity of ing less directly to their needs.5 In an effort
function. care, caregiving can contribute to negative to explore the types of information that
Caregiving is a growing public health effects on quality of life and physical and might help dialysis family members, this
issue, with an estimated 21% of the United mental health.2-4 qualitative research sought to:
States population providing unpaid care to To date, little research has been done 1. Understand more about the roles family
an adult with a disability and or chronic to examine the specific information needs members of dialysis patients adopt
illness.2-4 This percentage is likely to grow of dialysis family members that may help with respect to dialysis care; and
significantly as the population ages in com- to alleviate the challenges they experience 2. Identify informational gaps that renal
ing years. Caregiving ranges from helping in their roles in dialysis care. Previous professionals and organizations could
with activities such as managing finances, research with dialysis family members address to better meet the needs of
grocery shopping, and housework to assist- found they needed to be more informed family members.
Methods Sources of information about dialysis Table II presents the education levels
care; of participants across both testing sites.
We selected qualitative research methods Information needs across stages of Most participants had lower education lev-
because our research objectives included patients dialysis care (e.g., diagnosis els, including some college or below. The
mainly subjective and exploratory issues. with ESRD, the first few months on largest group had a high school degree or
Qualitative methods provide opportunities dialysis, and after 1 or more years on some college education.
for interaction between respondentsand dialysis); and Table III presents the race/ethnicity
between respondents and researchersthat Information needs and gaps regard- of participants at each data collection site.
can illuminate the range of reactions to a ing kidney disease, dialysis, vascular About half the participants were white, and
topic and the reasoning behind peoples access, transplants, diet/nutrition, and about one-fourth were African American.
views or opinions. With small samples exercise. Table IV presents the age distribution
of respondents, the results of qualitative of participants across both sites. Patients
research are not intended to be interpreted All of the triads were both audio- and ranged in age from 19 to 84 years old.
quantitatively or generalized to the popula- videotaped. The institutional review board More than half the participants were older
tion under study. Instead, they are intended at the Research Triangle Institute reviewed than 50. The mean age of all participants at
to generate more depth of insight into a and approved each protocol and our proce- both sites was 51.5 years old.
topic that can be especially useful in guid- dures for obtaining informed consent.
ing development or enhancing services Participant Recruitment
such as those for family members of dialy- Participants
sis patients. Data collection at each site was preceded
We conducted a series of 12 triads The 12 triads included a total of 41 fam- by a process of recruiting and scheduling
(small focus-group discussions with 3 or ily members of dialysis patients (21 in Los participants. Social workers at local dialysis
4 participants) in Los Angeles, Calif., and Angeles, 20 in Cleveland). Most were spous- facilities were contacted for names of fam-
Cleveland, Ohio. Six triads were conducted es and female. Table I presents the number ily members who indicated they would be
in each location between May and July of participants by type of family member interested in participating in this research
2006. Like a focus group, a triad is a (a participants relationship to a dialysis study and would be willing to be called
research tool that allows for collection of patient) and sex for each testing site. by study staff to discuss their potential
qualitative data by observing interactions
among a group of respondents. Data are
obtained through semi-structured group
discussions that provide insight into atti-
TABLE I. Number of participants per target audience group by
tudes, perceptions, and opinions of respon- research site.
dents that would otherwise be unlikely to Los Angeles Cleveland Total
emerge in the absence of group dynamics.
The advantage of conducting a triad is Family Member Male Female Male Female
that it strikes a balance between one-on- Spouse 4 4 3 10 21
one interviewing and larger focus groups,
Daughter/son 3 7 3 13
enabling more personal in-depth explora-
tion with each participant along with small- Parent 2 2 4
group interaction. Other* 1 1 1 3
The respondents were family mem- Total 8 13 4 16 41
bers of dialysis patients, including spouses,
*Other includes sibling, grandchild, and caregiver not biologically related to dialysis patient but considered a
children, and parents. They included both person like a mother.
primary caregivers and family members
involved in a patients care, but not in a pri-
mary role. The triads lasted up to 2 hours. TABLE II. Participant education level by research site.
We used a semi-structured moderators
Los Angeles Cleveland Total
guide with standardized probes to ensure
comparability across triads. The guide used High school 2 4 6
in Cleveland was slightly modified from High school 3 8 11
the guide used in Los Angeles based on Some college 9 3 12
the finding that some of the original ques-
tions were less useful. The moderators Associates/bachelors degree 3 4 7
guides explored several research topics, Graduate degree 3 1 4
including: Unknown 1 1
Participants roles and challenges in
Total 21 20 41
patients dialysis care;
be expected to need a lot of basic clinical information and support needs. The
and treatment information including on Internet, including Medicares Dialysis
survival rates, causes of kidney failure, Facility Compare Web site, appears to have
and preparing for what dialysis involves. good potential to be a source for the types
The latter includes information on how to of information desired. It may also be a
find a dialysis center, what happens during method for linking family members with
dialysis treatments, and insurance coverage. others facing the same needs and for facili-
After their patients were on dialysis for a tating support networks. Doctors, nurses,
few months, family members information and other renal care professionals could
needs focused on understanding what to also take on increased roles in fulfilling the
expect as patients received dialysis. This information needs of family members and
included learning about how the dialysis thus better support their roles as caregivers
machine works, what side effects of treat- for dialysis patients during periods when
ment might occur, and how to care for a they are away from healthcare facilities.
vascular access, as well as about issues
focused on their roles in dialysis care, such Acknowledgements
as nutrition and medication management.
Information needs over longer peri- The authors would like to acknowledge
ods tended to focus on similar issues but Jennifer Uhrig, Pamela Frederick, Jayne
also included understanding the long-term Hammen, David Miranda, Kristi Klicko,
effects of dialysis on patients and new med- and Dori Schatell for their assistance with
ication and treatment advances. Although this research.
these findings suggest that informational The research was funded by the Centers
materials tailored to different stages of for Medicare and Medicaid Services under
dialysis may appeal to family members, contract number 500-00-0024. The state-
they also identify opportunities for renal ments contained in this article are solely
providers and professionals to acknowl- those of the authors and do not necessarily
edge and address the changing information reflect the views or policies of CMS. D&T
needs of family members, whether they are
new to dialysis or have years of experience References
with patients on dialysis. 1. Trisolini M, Roussel R, Zerhusen E, et al. Activating
Most family members indicated they did chronic kidney disease patients and family members
through the Internet to promote integration of care.
not receive enough information about their Int J Integr Care. 2004;4.
patients kidney disease or dialysis when 2. National Alliance for Caregiving and AARP. Caregiv-
they were first diagnosed with ESRD. In ing in the U.S. Washington, DC: National Alliance for
Caregiving and AARP; 2005.
particular, they would like more information
3. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.
from doctors. It is possible that in actuality, Characteristics and health of caregivers and
participants had received more information care recipientsNorth Carolina, 2005. MMWR.
2007;56:529-532.
than they thought they did, but had not read
4. Talley RC, Crews JE. Framing the public health of
through the materials they were given (e.g., caregiving. Am J Public Health. 2007;97:224-228.
brochures and pamphlets) because of feeling 5. Trisolini M, Zerhusen E, Bandel K, et al. Evaluation of
overwhelmed by the volume of information the dialysis facility compare website tool on Medicare.
gov. Dial Transplant. 2006;35:196-214.
or having difficulty understanding it during
an emotional time such as first learning of
this very serious diagnosis.
Physicians and other care providers
need to be aware of the limited capacity for
information that patients and their family
members have in these stressful situations.
In addition, given that most participants
said they sought information from other
individuals, family members may prefer to
receive information face to face or may best
digest some types of information when it is
given in that more personal type of setting.
We found family members of dia-
lysis patients to have a range of different