Professional Documents
Culture Documents
1
0 75 45 45 75 50 16 As (mm2) 16
MAX. BARS ON
Muy (kN.m) =
5
'D' FACE =
0 2060 0
4
MuxL (kN.m) =
16 1.31 % 16
5
MuyL (kN.m) =
20 0 0 0 20
1
Pu/Puz = 0.25 0.49 0.74 0.76 0.59 0.72 1 3 2 3 1
AlphaN = 1.08 1.49 1.90 1.94 1.65 1.86
REINF. POSITION
LHS =
CHECK = REV.REINF REV.REINF REV.REINF REV.REINF REV.REINF REV.REINF
Pu-Mux : INTERACTION DIAGRAM
2500
2000
Pu (kN)
4; 1550
1500 3; 1500
6; 1450
Pu-Mux
5; 1200
1000 2; 1000
500 1; 500
0
0 20 40 60 80 100 120 140 160 180
Mux (kN.m )
Pu-Muy : INTERACTION DIAGRAM
2500
2000
Pu (kN)
4; 1550
1500 3; 1500
6; 1450
Pu-Muy
5; 1200
1000 2; 1000
500 1; 500
0
0 20 40 60 80 100 120 140 160
Muy (kN.m )
Pu-Mux INTERACTION TABLE
b(mm)= 350
D(mm)= 450
fck(Mpa)= 20
D(mm)= 450
b(mm)= 350
fck(Mpa)= 20
COLUMN DESIGN
b(mm)= 500 MuxL D(mm)= 500 Muyl column no.
D(mm)= 500 cover b(mm)= 500 SAMPLE
fck(Mpa)= 25 55 fck(Mpa)= 25 PROBLEM 2
row,no. Asi, mm2 di, mm row,no. Asi, mm2 di, mm
1 1923 55.0 1 2453 55.0 25 20 20 20
2 981 152.5 2 628 152.5 25
6790
3 981 250.0 3 628 250.0 25
4 981 347.5 4 628 347.5 25 2.72 %
5 1923 445.0 5 2453 445.0 25 20 20 20
Asc / % 6790 2.72 Asc / % 6790 2.72
di= from max. comp. Fibre di= from max. comp. Fibre
k ( xu/D >1) Pu Mu k ( xu/D >1) Pu Mu
5.00 4990 8 k>=1 5.00 4989 9
2.50 4928 24 2.50 4924 27
1.50 4677 76 1.50 4646 87
1.20 4385 131 1.20 4332 148
1.10 4206 164 1.10 4142 184
1.00 3942 211 1.00 3863 236
0.900 3511 275 k<1 0.900 3421 304
0.850 3275 306 0.850 3179 338
0.800 3010 336 0.800 2913 373
0.775 2870 352 0.775 2772 390
0.750 2725 367 0.750 2626 408
0.725 2574 383 0.725 2474 426
0.700 2416 399 0.700 2314 445
0.675 2250 416 0.675 2148 464
0.650 2074 433 0.650 1971 484
0.625 1897 449 0.625 1795 502
0.600 1747 459 0.600 1657 513
0.575 1599 466 0.575 1524 521
0.550 1452 472 0.550 1398 526
0.500 1128 480 0.500 1128 534
0.300 -71 422 0.300 168 482
Puz, Axial , code 4825 Puz, Axial , code 4825
Pu, Axial , code 4320 Pu, Axial , code 4320
LOAD COMB 1 2 3 4 5 6
Pu 3500 3500 4000 4000 4320 4320
Mux 246 196 180 145 129 104
Muy 123 196 90 145 65 104
Muxl : Col. D 276.21 276.21 200.99 200.99 143.18 143.18
Muyl : Col. I 292.11 292.11 210.30 210.30 150.78 150.78
25
25
25
25
25
Pu, Axial
4320
column no.
SAMPLE
ROBLEM 2
25
25
25
25
25
Pu, Axial
4320
1. GENERAL :
The design of rectangular RCC column for axial load and uniaxial bending is carried out using Pu-Mu
Interaction Diagrams using SP 16. For axial compression and biaxial bending the procedure is to use the above
mentioned Interaction diagrams to calculate limiting uniaxial bending moment( Muxl and Muyl) about each
axes separately for given Pu and to satisfy inequality equation of IS-456 i.e. (Mux /
Muxl) + (Muy / Muyl) < 1.
2. Design of Columns using 'SP 16' :
In SP 16, Pu-Mu interaction charts are presented for steel grade Fe 250, Fe 415 and Fe500 for
d/D = 0.05, 0.1, 0.15 and 0.2 . The reinforcement arrangement is idealized as :
1. Reinforcement on two opposite faces : Chart No. 27 to 38
2. Reinforcement on all four faces equally distributed : Chart No. 39 to 50.
Limitations of 'SP 16' :
1. The charts for case 1 can be used for uniaxial bending only. However small bending Moment in the
other direction may be, There is no way to design a column for Biaxial Bending for this arrangement of
reinforcement.
2. When the charts are used for Mux (BM @ Major axis) for case 1, the reinforcement will be on the
smaller (width- b) faces. These charts do not accommodate reinf. to be provided on larger (Depth-D)
faces from detailing aspects. If a Column with D = 900mm, minimum four bars are required on each
D-face, the charts can not account for these internal bars which may be of smaller diameter.
3. It is evident that larger diameter bars on the highly stressed face makes efficient use of
reinforcement, even larger diameter bars in corner are used with advantage for biaxial bending, it can
not be accommodated by use of SP16.
4. There would be confusion in arranging the reinforcement as equally distributed for rectangular
section with large D/b ratio.
5. When the analysis and design is carried out using professional software, the intricacy of Column
design is such that a designer would be confident only if he checks the design by his own design tools
for different cases. The column design is carried for various load combinations at junction with beam
at top and bottom and at @ mid height section. More over most of the software normally use the
internal forces at the nodes instead of the beam face.
An effort is made to develop a spreadsheet for design of RCC columns to over come the above
mentioned limitations.
3. COLUMN DESIGN SPREADSHEET:
The formulation adopted is for Limit State of Collapse as per IS 456. The Pu-Mu has been calculated
considering concrete as well as each individual reinforcement bar separately.
Concrete Grade M20, Steel Grade Fe 415 is considered.
The column cross section accommodates up to maximum three internal equally spaced reinforcement
bars on each face apart from the four corner bars. No. of bars on opposite faces are same, i.e. on any
face no. of bars would be 2 to 5. At a time six load combinations are included but process can be
repeated for any numbers in the same sheet.
* The Worksheet 'Mux' shows data, steps and output calculation points for Interaction diagram Pu-
Mux diagram which is interpolated for Muxl.
* The Worksheet 'Muy' shows data, steps and output calculation points for Interaction diagram Pu-
Muy diagram which is interpolated for Muyl.
* The worksheet 'Sample Problem' shows the design output for understanding the problem.
6. DISCLAIMER
* TO BE USED BY QUALIFIED STRUCTURAL ENGINEER FOR DESIGN AS PER OF IS - 456. CHECK BEFORE USE.
* NO LIABILITY OF DEVELOPER OF ANY TYPE UNTILL A LICENCE AGREEMENT IS SIGNED BETWEEN USER AND
DEVELOPER, AND THAT THE USER IS FORMALLY TRAINED FOR USE OF THIS SPREAD SHEET, INCL. ITS ADVANTAGES
AND ITS LIMITATIONS.