You are on page 1of 1

Llamas vs Abaya, 60 Phil 502

Issue:
Facts: Whether or not the defendant was relieved from paying further
A judgment was rendered by the CFI against the defendants interests from the date of his letter.
Eleazar and Gonzalo Abaya to pay Llamas as preferred creditor in
the sum of of P14,457.38, as principal, with accrued interest Held: The stipulated interest should accrue, and be payable up to
thereon at 12 per cent per annum until November 30, 1931, plus the date on which the principal is paid. The reason for this is that
compound interest on said sum from December 1, 1931, until fully the tender of payment did not have the effect of suspending the
paid, also P1,500 as attorney's fees, with costs; and directing, in interest and its accumulation under the provision of Article 1256 of
case of failure of the debtor within ninety (90) days to deposit said the Civil Code.
amount or to pay it to the plaintiffs, that the mortgaged property be
sold in conformity with the law . The Court in its resolution declaring that the stipulated interest to
which the plaintiffs are entitled is at the rate of 9 per cent per
Eleazar appealed the judgment contending that the preferred annum from March 6, 1929, the date on which they required the
credit is only up to the amount of P5,933. Before promulgation, on mortgage from the Philippine National Bank, up to December 18,
November 28, 1932, the defendant through a letter to the plaintiff 1933, the date on which Eleazar deposited the sum of P5,933.30
tendered payment for the sum of P5,933.30 with accrued interest, with the clerk of court; that said interest is compound and should
he also stated that he formally accrued interest subsequent to the be computed semi-annually in accordance with the contract; that
date of his letter. Llamas ignored the letter. the principal and interest so computed should bear interest at the
said rate from December 19, 1933, until fully paid, and that the
On December 18, 1933, the Supreme Court reversed CFIs ruling plaintiffs are likewise entitled to collect, by way of penalty, 10 per
and ordered defendant Eleazar to pay the amount mentioned in cent of the principal and compound interest thereon, until fully paid.
his letter which he deposited over a year after his letter tendering
payment to the clerk of court. My idea here is that when he (Eleazar) formally tendered payment
on November 28, 1932, the obligation was not extinguished. He
Llamas filed motion alleging that the amount due already accrued did not made any consignation. AS borne from the records, he only
interest. Eleazar on the other hand, contend that he is only liable deposited the check on December 18, 1933 when the judgment
for interest until November 28, 1932, from the time he made a was rendered.
formal tender of payment. Anskee

You might also like