Professional Documents
Culture Documents
This paper contains hand calculations for the relief loads inside the Safety Analysis Environment.
This paper shows examples and equations for emergency scenarios, including control valve failure,
heat exchanger tube rupture, hydraulic expansion, and fire, which will help you to validate the
calculations of this tool located within Aspen HYSYS.
Eq. 1 = 0.5! ! !
If the pressure drop across the control valve exceeds the critical limit, then the mass flow rate
through the valve is given by Equation 2 below.
Eq. 2 = 2.8! ! !
Otherwise, the mass flow rate through the valve is given by Equation 3 below, where Pr is the
downstream (relieving) pressure in psia, SG is the specific gravity relative to air at upstream
conditions, Z is the compressibility of the stream at upstream conditions, and Cv is a characteristic
parameter of the control valve.
Eq. 3 ! + !
= 3.22!
The specific gravity may be calculated as below, where M is the molecular weight and Tr is the
upstream temperature in F.
Eq. 4 520
=
29 ! + 460
2 Equations and Example Benchmark Calculations for Emergency Scenario Required Relief Loads 2015 Aspen Technology Inc. 11-7851-0915
PSV Plus Vapor Example with Unchoked Flow
The example is based on the following conditions:
Figure 1: Subcritical vapor control valve case calculated in Aspen HYSYS using PSV Plus equations
3 Equations and Example Benchmark Calculations for Emergency Scenario Required Relief Loads 2015 Aspen Technology Inc. 11-7851-0915
Setting up a stream in Aspen HYSYS at the upstream conditions will yield the following properties:
M = 68.64
Z = 0.68
The pressure drop across the valve at relieving conditions is only 19.3 psi, so the flow is subcritical.
The control valve capacity at relief conditions is calculated using (Eq. 3):
19.3 286 + 14.7 + 320 1.578
= 3.22 20 = 10737 lb/h
0.68
Subtracting the normal flowrate of 9,000 lb/h gives a required relief load of 1,737 lb/h.
The results calculated above are compared to results obtained in Aspen HYSYS in Table 1.
Table 1: Comparison of example calculation and Aspen HYSYS calculation for control valve failure with
subcritical vapor flow
4 Equations and Example Benchmark Calculations for Emergency Scenario Required Relief Loads 2015 Aspen Technology Inc. 11-7851-0915
PSV Plus Vapor Example with Choked Flow
The example is based on the following conditions:
Setting up a stream in Aspen HYSYS at the upstream conditions will yield the following properties:
M = 68.64
Z = 0.624
5 Equations and Example Benchmark Calculations for Emergency Scenario Required Relief Loads 2015 Aspen Technology Inc. 11-7851-0915
The critical pressure drop may be calculated using (Eq. 1):
= 0.5 0.75 ! 420 = 118.1 psi
The pressure drop across the valve at relieving conditions is only 119.3 psi, so the flow is critical.
The control valve capacity at relief conditions is calculated using (Eq. 2):
= 2.8 0.75 420 5.5 1.51 0.624 = 7,546 lb/h
Subtracting the normal flowrate of 3,300 lb/h gives a required relief load of 4,246 lb/h.
The results calculated above are compared to results obtained in Aspen HYSYS in Table 2.
Table 2: Comparison of example calculation and Aspen HYSYS calculation for control valve failure with
critical vapor flow using PSV Plus equations
6 Equations and Example Benchmark Calculations for Emergency Scenario Required Relief Loads 2015 Aspen Technology Inc. 11-7851-0915
PSV Plus Liquid Equations
The critical pressure drop for liquid flow across a control valve is defined as below, where FF is a
calculated critical flow parameter, Pv is the vapor pressure/bubble point pressure of the liquid in psia,
and Pc is the critical pressure of the liquid in psia.
!
Eq. 5 ! = 0.96 0.28
!
Eq. 6 = ! ! ! ! !
The volumetric capacity of the control valve may be calculated as shown below, where Pmin is
actual P or P*, whichever is smaller of the actual pressure drop across the valve and the critical
pressure drop across the valve, SG is the specific gravity of the fluid at upstream conditions relative
to water at 60
F (15.6 C), and Q is the capacity of the control valve in gpm.
!"#
Eq. 7 = !
The required relief load in gpm may be converted to lb/h, as shown below:
60 min 1 ft
Eq. 8 =
1 h 7.4805 gal
Setting up a stream in Aspen HYSYS at the upstream conditions will yield the following properties:
Pc = 562.6 psia
Pv = 216.1 psia
= 29.95 lb/ft hence SG = 29.95/62.3 = 0.4807
7 Equations and Example Benchmark Calculations for Emergency Scenario Required Relief Loads 2015 Aspen Technology Inc. 11-7851-0915
The critical pressure drop is calculated from (Eq. 5) and (Eq. 6):
216.1
! = 0.96 0.28 = 0.7865
562.6
= 0.75! 275 0.7865216.1 = 59 psi
The pressure drop at relief conditions is 51.3 psi, which is less than the critical limit; therefore, the
flow is unchoked. The required relief load is calculated from (Eq. 7) and (Eq. 8):
51.3
= 8 = 82.6 gpm
0.4807
60 min 1 ft
= 82.6 gpm 29.95 lb/ft ! = 19,840 lb/h
1 h 7.4805 gal
8 Equations and Example Benchmark Calculations for Emergency Scenario Required Relief Loads 2015 Aspen Technology Inc. 11-7851-0915
The results calculated above are compared to results obtained in Aspen HYSYS in Table 3.
Table 3: Comparison of example calculation and Aspen HYSYS calculation for control valve failure with
subcritical liquid flow using PSV Plus equations
Setting up a stream in Aspen HYSYS at the upstream conditions will yield the following properties:
Pc = 583.5 psia
Pv = 247.1 psia
= 30.85 lb/ft hence SG = 30.85/62.3 = 0.495
The critical pressure drop is calculated from (Eq. 5) and (Eq. 6):
247.1
! = 0.96 0.28 = 0.778
583.5
= 0.75! 275 0.778247.1 = 46.6 psi
9 Equations and Example Benchmark Calculations for Emergency Scenario Required Relief Loads 2015 Aspen Technology Inc. 11-7851-0915
Figure 4: Choked liquid control valve
case calculated in Aspen HYSYS
using PSV Plus equations
The pressure drop at relief conditions is 144.8 psi, which is greater than the critical limit, therefore
load is calculated from (Eq. 7) and (Eq. 8):
the flow is choked. The required relief
46.6
= 120 = 1164 gpm
0.495
60 min 1 ft
= 1164 gpm 30.85 lb/ft ! = 288,100 lb/h
1 h 7.4805 gal
The results calculated above are compared to results obtained in Aspen HYSYS in Table 4.
Table 4: Comparison of example calculation and Aspen HYSYS calculation for control valve failure with
critical liquid flow using PSV Plus equations
10 Equations and Example Benchmark Calculations for Emergency Scenario Required Relief Loads 2015 Aspen Technology Inc. 11-7851-0915
Heat Exchanger Tube Break
For a heat exchanger tube break scenario, API Standard 521 states that the calculation should be
based on a sharp break in one tube, at the back of the tube sheet, with high pressure fluid assumed
to flow both through the stub in the tube sheet and through the long section of tube. A calculation
basis of flow through two orifices is allowed as a simplifying assumption, because the resulting relief
load is larger than would be calculated based on flow through a long tube.1
The tube rupture calculation in the Safety Analysis Environment uses a two-orifice calculation as
described in the literature.2 3
Vapor Equations
As with control valves, vapor flow through a tube rupture is subject to a critical flow limit. The
downstream critical limit pressure may be calculated as below, where Pcfr is the critical limit
pressure in psia, P1 is the high-pressure-side pressure in psia, and k is the ideal gas specific heat ratio
CP/(CP R) at relief conditions.
!
Eq. 9 2 !!!
!"# = !
+ 1
The flow through the rupture is given by the calculation below, where w is the required relief load
in lb/h, C is the orifice coefficient, A is the total rupture area in in, P is the pressure difference
between the P1 and the greater of the downstream relief pressure or Pcfr, and is the vapor density
at upstream conditions in lb/ft.
Eq. 10 = 2407.7
For flow from the tube side into the shell side, the orifice coefficient used is typically 0.74 (so the
product with the leading coefficient is 1,781.7), and the expansion coefficient Y may be calculated, as
shown in Equation 11 below.
Eq. 11 = 1 0.4
!
For flow from the shell side into the tube side, the orifice coefficient used is typically 0.6 (so the
product with the leading coefficient is 1,444.6), and the expansion coefficient may be calculated as
shown below.
Eq. 12 = 1 0.317
!
11 Equations and Example Benchmark Calculations for Emergency Scenario Required Relief Loads 2015 Aspen Technology Inc. 11-7851-0915
Vapor Example with Unchoked Shell-Into-Tube Flow
The example is based on the following conditions:
Setting up a stream in Aspen HYSYS at the high-pressure side conditions will yield the following
properties:
= 0.7756 lb/ft
12 Equations and Example Benchmark Calculations for Emergency Scenario Required Relief Loads 2015 Aspen Technology Inc. 11-7851-0915
The critical flow pressure is calculated using (Eq. 9):
!.!"#
2 !.!"# !!
!"# = 110 psia = 64.9 psia
1.073 + 1
Since the critical pressure of 64.9 psia is less than the low-pressure side relief pressure of 80.7 psia,
flow is not choked and the pressure drops across the break P = 29.3 psi.
The required relief load may be calculated using (Eq. 10) and (Eq. 12):
!
= 2 0.709 in = 0.7896 in
4
29.3
= 1 0.317 = 0.9156
110
= 1444.6 0.7896 0.9156 29.3 0.7756 = 4,979 lb/h
The results calculated above are compared to results obtained in Aspen HYSYS in Table 5.
Table 5: Comparison of example calculation and Aspen HYSYS calculation for exchanger tube rupture with
subcritical vapor flow
13 Equations and Example Benchmark Calculations for Emergency Scenario Required Relief Loads 2015 Aspen Technology Inc. 11-7851-0915
Vapor Example with Choked Tube-Into-Shell Flow
The example is based on the following conditions:
Setting up a stream in Aspen HYSYS at the high-pressure side conditions will yield the following
properties:
= 2.493 lb/ft
14 Equations and Example Benchmark Calculations for Emergency Scenario Required Relief Loads 2015 Aspen Technology Inc. 11-7851-0915
The critical flow pressure is calculated using (Eq. 9):
!.!"#
2 !.!"# !!
!"# = 275 psia = 162.0 psia
1.079 + 1
Since the critical pressure of 162.0 psia is greater than the low-pressure side relief pressure of 80.7
psia, flow is choked and the pressure drops across the break P = 113.0 psi.
The required relief load may be calculated using (Eq. 10) and (Eq. 11):
!
= 2 1.18 in = 2.187 in
4
113.0
= 1 0.4 = 0.8356
275
= 1781.7 2.187 0.8356 113.0 2.493 = 54,650 lb/h
The results calculated above are compared to results obtained in Aspen HYSYS in Table 6.
Table 6: Comparison of example calculation and Aspen HYSYS calculation for exchanger tube rupture with
critical vapor flow
15 Equations and Example Benchmark Calculations for Emergency Scenario Required Relief Loads 2015 Aspen Technology Inc. 11-7851-0915
Liquid Equations
Liquid flow is not checked for choking. The flow through the rupture is given by Equation 13 below.
Eq. 13 = 2407.7
As with vapor cases, for a tube-into-shell break, a value of 0.74 is typically used for the orifice
coefficient, giving a combined leading coefficient of 1781.7. For a shell-into-tube break, a value of 0.6
is typically used for the orifice coefficient, giving a combined leading coefficient of 1444.6.
Setting up a stream in Aspen HYSYS at the relief conditions will yield the following properties:
= 44.13 lb/ft
16 Equations and Example Benchmark Calculations for Emergency Scenario Required Relief Loads 2015 Aspen Technology Inc. 11-7851-0915
The required relief load may be calculated using (Eq. 13):
!
= 2 1.375 in = 2.97 in
4
= 1781.7 2.97 740 455.3 44.13 = 593,132 lb/h
The results calculated above are compared to results obtained in Aspen HYSYS in Table 7.
Table 7: Comparison of example calculation and Aspen HYSYS calculation for exchanger tube rupture with
liquid flow
Once the critical limit pressure is obtained, the vapor and liquid properties for calculating the
required relief load are determined at the greater of the critical limit pressure and the low-pressure-
side relief pressure (high-pressure-side conditions may be used if a vapor phase exists).
The fraction of the total flow area that is assigned to the vapor phase may be computed as shown
below, where C is the orifice coefficient, typically 0.6 for shell-into-tube flow or 0.74 for tube-into-
shell flow, Y is the vapor expansion coefficient computed using (Eq. 11) or (Eq. 12) as appropriate,
P is the pressure drop across the tube break subject to the downstream critical limit, values are
the respective phase densities, and x is the vapor mass fraction at the low-pressure-side pressure
subject to the downstream critical limit.
17 Equations and Example Benchmark Calculations for Emergency Scenario Required Relief Loads 2015 Aspen Technology Inc. 11-7851-0915
Eq. 14 ! = 2404.7 !
Eq. 15 = 2404.7
Eq. 16 ! =
1 ! +
Then, the required relief load is calculated as the sum of the vapor and liquid flows, as shown below.
Eq. 17 ! = ! !
Eq. 18 = 1 !
Eq. 19 = ! +
18 Equations and Example Benchmark Calculations for Emergency Scenario Required Relief Loads 2015 Aspen Technology Inc. 11-7851-0915
Figure 9: Mixed-phase, critical
exchanger tube rupture case
calculated in Aspen HYSYS
Setting up a stream in Aspen HYSYS at the high-pressure side conditions and performing an
isenthalpic flash to relief pressure will yield the following properties:
T = 333.8 F
k = 1.059
19 Equations and Example Benchmark Calculations for Emergency Scenario Required Relief Loads 2015 Aspen Technology Inc. 11-7851-0915
Since the critical pressure of 278.9 psia is less than the low-pressure side relief pressure of 289.7
psia, flow is not choked and the pressure drop across the break P = 180.3 psi. Liquid and vapor
properties may be obtained in Aspen HYSYS at the high side pressure using the previously-flashed
stream, yielding:
l = 28.74 lb/ft
v = 4.529 lb/ft
The results calculated above are compared to results obtained in Aspen HYSYS in Table 8.
Table 8: Comparison of example calculation and Aspen HYSYS calculation for exchanger tube rupture with
subcritical mixed phase flow
20 Equations and Example Benchmark Calculations for Emergency Scenario Required Relief Loads 2015 Aspen Technology Inc. 11-7851-0915
Mixed-Phase Example with Choked Shell-Into-Tube Flow
The example is based on the following conditions:
Setting up a stream in Aspen HYSYS at high-pressure side conditions and performing an isenthalpic
flash to relief pressure will yield the following properties:
k = 1.061
Since the critical pressure of 278.7 psia exceeds the low-pressure side relief pressure of 179.7 psia,
flow is choked and the pressure drop across the break P = 191.3 psi. Liquid and vapor properties
may be obtained in Aspen HYSYS at the high side pressure using the previously-flashed stream,
yielding:
= 28.74 lb/ft
v = 4.529 lb/ft
21 Equations and Example Benchmark Calculations for Emergency Scenario Required Relief Loads 2015 Aspen Technology Inc. 11-7851-0915
The required relief load may be calculated using (Eq. 11) and (Eq. 14) through (Eq. 19):
!
= 2 1.18 in = 2.187 in
4
191.3
= 1 0.317 = 0.8710
470
! = 1444.6 0.8710 191.3 4.529 = 37036
= 1444.6 191.3 28.74 = 107114
0.2718 107114
! = = 0.5191
1 0.2718 37036 + 0.2718 107114
! = 0.5191 2.187 37036 = 42,050 lb/h
= 1 0.5191 2.187 107114 = 112,700 lb/h
= ! + = 154,800 lb/h
The results calculated above are compared to results obtained in Aspen HYSYS in Table 9.
Table 9: Comparison of example calculation and Aspen HYSYS calculation for exchanger tube rupture with
critical mixed phase flow
22 Equations and Example Benchmark Calculations for Emergency Scenario Required Relief Loads 2015 Aspen Technology Inc. 11-7851-0915
Hydraulic Expansion
Equations
For a scenario where heat input causes hydraulic expansion in blocked-in, liquid-full equipment or
process piping, API Standard 521 gives two equations for calculating the required relief load, one for
U.S. customary units and one for SI units.1 These equations may be combined and written as shown
below, where q is the volumetric required relief load in m/s or gpm, N is a dimensional constant with
a value of 1000 for SI units or 500 for U.S. customary units, V is the cubic expansion coefficient
in 1/K or 1/R, is the total heat transfer rate in W or BTU/h, SG is the specific gravity of the fluid
referenced to water at 60 F or 15.6 C (a reference density of 998.9 kg/m or 62.3 lb/ft), and CP is
the fluid heat capacity in J/kg-K or BTU/lb-R.
!
Eq. 20 =
!
Example
The example is based on the following conditions:
aV = 0.0085 1/K
SG = 0.63
23 Equations and Example Benchmark Calculations for Emergency Scenario Required Relief Loads 2015 Aspen Technology Inc. 11-7851-0915
The required relief load is calculated using (Eq. 20), and converted to a mass flow rate:
0.0085 581,500
= = 0.00317 m3 /s
1000 0.63 2,474
3600 s
= 0.00317 m/s 0.63 998.9 kg/m! = 7182 kg/h
1 h
The results calculated above are compared to results obtained in Aspen HYSYS in Table 10.
Table 10: Comparison of example calculation and Aspen HYSYS calculation for hydraulic expansion
Fire
Wetted Fire Equations
The required relief load due to vaporization of liquid inventory is calculated using equations obtained
from API Standard 521.1
The required relief load is calculated using the following equations shown below, where Q is the rate
at which heat is added to the vessel contents in W; CDF is a constant to account for the presence or
absence of adequate draining and firefighting, with a value of 43,200 when adequate drainage and
firefighting are present or 70,900 when they are not; F is an environment factor to account for the
presence of fireproof insulation, with a value of 1.0 for a vessel without fireproof insulation; Aws is the
exposed wetted surface area of the vessel, subject to certain conditions, in m.
Eq. 21 = !" !" !.!"
Per the standard, for horizontal and vertical vessels, only the portion of the liquid inventory within
7.6 m of grade should be considered. For spherical vessels, the portion of the liquid inventory
within 7.6 m of grade or up to the maximum horizontal diameter, whichever is greater, should be
considered, where w is the required relief load in kg/h and l is the latent heat of the vessel contents
at appropriate relieving conditions in kJ/kg.
Eq. 22 = 3.6 /
24 Equations and Example Benchmark Calculations for Emergency Scenario Required Relief Loads 2015 Aspen Technology Inc. 11-7851-0915
Figure 11: External fire case with a wetted vertical vessel calculated in Aspen HYSYS
25 Equations and Example Benchmark Calculations for Emergency Scenario Required Relief Loads 2015 Aspen Technology Inc. 11-7851-0915
Wetted Fire Example with a Vertical Vessel
The example is based on the following conditions:
No correction needs to be made to the portion of liquid inventory that is considered, as the normal
liquid level is less than 7.6 m above grade. The wetted surface area is computed as shown below.
!!!"" = = 32.99 m
!!"# = 1.084 ! = 13.28 m
!" = 1.10 !!!"" + !!"# = 50.9 m
The required relief load is calculated using (Eq. 21) and (Eq. 22):
!.!"
= 43200 1.0 50.9 = 1,084,000 W
1,084,000
= 3.6 = 13,900 kg/h
280.8
The results calculated above are compared to results obtained in Aspen HYSYS in Table 11.
26 Equations and Example Benchmark Calculations for Emergency Scenario Required Relief Loads 2015 Aspen Technology Inc. 11-7851-0915
Variable Units Example Calculation Aspen HYSYS
Vessel Type Vertical Vertical
Bottom Head Included? Yes Yes
Vessel Diameter (D) m 3.5 3.500
Vessel T/T Length (L) m 8.0 8.000
Vessel Liquid Level (LL) m 3.0 3.000
Vessel Elevation Above Grade m 0.0 0.000
Additional Area 10% 10.00%
Environment Factor (F) 1.0 1.000
Latent Heat () kJ/kg 280.8 280.8
Adequate drainage and Yes Yes
firefighting present?
Heat Input Area (Aws) m2 50.9 50.89
Heat Input (Q) 1,084,000 W 3,901,000 kJ/h
Required Relieving Flow kg/h 13,900 13,890
Blue = Calculation input Gray = Calculated value
Table 11: Comparison of example calculation and Aspen HYSYS calculation for external fire on a vertical
wetted vessel
27 Equations and Example Benchmark Calculations for Emergency Scenario Required Relief Loads 2015 Aspen Technology Inc. 11-7851-0915
Wetted Fire Example with a Horizontal Vessel
The example is based on the following conditions:
The fraction of the total area of the horizontal shell that is wetted may be computed as shown below.
cos =
= 1.427
2
!" = = = 0.454
2
!!!"" = !" = 39.97 m
= 1 + 12 0.5 ! = 1.030
! 3.464 0.5 +
!!"# = 2 0.5 + 1 + 0.2887 ln = 11.89 m
8 2 3
!" = 1.10 !!!"" + !!"# = 57.0 m
The required relief load is calculated using (Eq. 21) and (Eq. 22):
!.!"
= 70900 1.0 57.0 = 1,952,000 W
1,952,000
= 3.6 = 25,030 kg/h
280.8
The results calculated above are compared to results obtained in Aspen HYSYS in Table 12.
28 Equations and Example Benchmark Calculations for Emergency Scenario Required Relief Loads 2015 Aspen Technology Inc. 11-7851-0915
Variable Units Example Calculation Aspen HYSYS
Vessel Type Horizontal Horizontal
Vessel Diameter (D) m 3.5 3.500
Vessel T/T Length (L) m 8.0 8.000
Vessel Liquid Level (LL) m 1.5 1.500
Vessel Elevation Above Grade m 0.0 0.000
Additional Area 10% 10.00%
Environment Factor (F) 1.0 1.000
Latent Heat () kJ/kg 280.8 280.8
Adequate drainage and No No
firefighting present?
Heat Input Area (Aws) m2 57.0 55.92
Heat Input (Q) 1,952,000 W 6,924,000 kJ/h
Required Relieving Flow kg/h 25,030 24,660
Blue = Calculation input Gray = Calculated value
Table 12: Comparison of example calculation and Aspen HYSYS calculation for external fire on a horizontal
wetted vessel
29 Equations and Example Benchmark Calculations for Emergency Scenario Required Relief Loads 2015 Aspen Technology Inc. 11-7851-0915
The wetted area exposed to heat input will be calculated using the equation below.
Eq. 23 !"!!"! =
The appropriate value for h depends on the variation of the example that we consider. In case 1, the
liquid level is above 7.6 m above grade, but below the equator of the vessel, so the full level of 2 m is
considered. In case 2, the liquid level is above 7.6 m above grade and above the equator of the vessel;
the equator is higher, so that level of 2.5 m is used. In case 3, the liquid level is not above 7.6 m above
grade nor above the equator of the vessel, so the full level of 2 m is considered. In case 4, the liquid
level is above 7.6 m above grade and above the equator of the vessel; 7.6 m above grade is higher,
so a level of (7.6 m 5 m = 2.6 m) is used. In case 5, the liquid level is below 7.6 m above grade and
below the equator of the vessel, so the full level of 3 m is considered.
Figure 13: External fire case with a wetted spherical vessel calculated in Aspen HYSYS
30 Equations and Example Benchmark Calculations for Emergency Scenario Required Relief Loads 2015 Aspen Technology Inc. 11-7851-0915
The resulting wetted areas are:
1 Aws=(5)(2) = 31.4 m
2 Aws=(5)(2.5) = 39.3 m
3 Aws=(5)(2) = 31.4 m
4 Aws=(5)(2.6) = 40.8 m
5 Aws=(5)(3) = 47.1 m
The results calculated above for case 3 are compared to results obtained in Aspen HYSYS in Table 13.
Table 13: Comparison of example calculation and Aspen HYSYS calculation for external fire on a spherical
wetted vessel
31 Equations and Example Benchmark Calculations for Emergency Scenario Required Relief Loads 2015 Aspen Technology Inc. 11-7851-0915
Unwetted Fire Equations
The required relief load for a vessel filled with vapor (or vapor-like supercritical fluid) exposed to a
fire are obtained from API Standard 521.1
The required relief load is calculated using the following equations, where for Equation 24, k is the
ideal gas specific heat ratio CP/(CP R).
!!!
Eq. 24 2 !!!
= 0.0395
+ 1
For Equation 25, T1 is the temperature at the upstream relieving pressure in K, Tn is the normal
operating temperature in K, and p1/pn is the ratio of relief to normal operating pressure in kPaa.
!
Eq. 25 ! =
! !
For Equation 26, Tw is the maximum wall temperature of the vessel in K and KD is the coefficient of
discharge of the relief valve (a value of 0.975 is typically used for preliminary design calculations).
0.2772 ! ! !.!"
!
Eq. 26 =
! ! !.!"#!
A minimum value of 182 should be used for F.
For equation 27, w is the required relief load in kg/h, M is the molecular weight of the fluid, and A is
the vessel area exposed to fire, which is calculated using the same method as the wetted area for a
liquid-full vessel exposed to fire.
! ! !.!"
Eq. 27 = 0.2772 !
!!.!"#$
32 Equations and Example Benchmark Calculations for Emergency Scenario Required Relief Loads 2015 Aspen Technology Inc. 11-7851-0915
Relief temperature is calculated using (Eq. 25):
2870
! = 499.25 = 551.1 K
2600
Flashing the contents at relief pressure and temperature in Aspen HYSYS yields the following
properties:
k = 1.210
Then, the required relief load is calculated using (Eq. 24), (Eq. 26), and (Eq. 27):
!.!"#!!
2 !.!"#!!
= 0.0395 1.210 = 0.0257
1.210 + 1
0.2772 866.5 551.1 !.!"
! = = 242.1
0.0257 0.975 551.1!.!"#!
Figure 14: External fire case with an unwetted horizontal vessel calculated in Aspen HYSYS
33 Equations and Example Benchmark Calculations for Emergency Scenario Required Relief Loads 2015 Aspen Technology Inc. 11-7851-0915
!!!"" = = 9.58 m
!!"#$ = 21.084 ! = 2.24 m
! = 1.15 !!!"" + !!"#$ = 13.6 m
13.6 866.5 551.1 !.!"
= 0.2772 18.02 1600 = 799.1 kg/h
551.1!.!"#$
The results calculated above are compared to results obtained in Aspen HYSYS in Table 14.
Table 14: Comparison of example calculation and Aspen HYSYS calculation for external fire on a horizontal
unwetted vessel
In Conclusion
Safety is of the highest priority to every process, and ensuring accurate, validated calculations is a
key component of this work. To view additional validation papers, access tutorial documents and
videos, and learn more about the tools AspenTech provides to address process safety work, please
visit the safety page on our company website, today!
References
1. American Petroleum Institute, API Standard 521 6th Ed.: Pressure-relieving and Depressuring
Systems, Washington, DC: API Publishing Services, 2014.
2. W. Y. Wong, PRV sizing for exchanger tube rupture, Hydrocarbon Processing, pp. 59-64,
February 1992.
3. W. Y. Wong, Correction to PRV sizing for exchanger tube rupture, Hydrocarbon Processing, p.
44, May 1992.
34 Equations and Example Benchmark Calculations for Emergency Scenario Required Relief Loads 2015 Aspen Technology Inc. 11-7851-0915
AspenTech is a leading supplier of software that optimizes process manufacturingfor energy, chemicals, engineering and
construction, and other industries that manufacture and produce products from a chemical process. With integrated aspenONE
solutions, process manufacturers can implement best practices for optimizing their engineering, manufacturing, and supply chain
operations. As a result, AspenTech customers are better able to increase capacity, improve margins, reduce costs, and become
more energy efficient. To see how the worlds leading process manufacturers rely on AspenTech to achieve their operational
excellence goals, visit www.aspentech.com.
Worldwide Headquarters
Aspen Technology, Inc.
20 Crosby Drive | Bedford, MA 01730 | United States
phone: +1-781-221-6400 | fax: +1-781-221-6410 | info@aspentech.com
Regional Headquarters
Houston, TX | United States
phone: +1-281-584-1000
So Paulo | Brazil
phone: +55-11-3443-6261
Reading | United Kingdom
phone: +44-(0)-1189-226400
Singapore | Republic of Singapore
phone: +65-6395-3900
Manama | Bahrain
phone: +973-13606-400
35 Equations and Example Benchmark Calculations for Emergency Scenario Required Relief Loads 2015 Aspen Technology Inc. 11-7851-0915