Professional Documents
Culture Documents
15
The TPS54325 does not need a power diode, since a 70-mW low-side MOSFET is integrated into the chip. The integrated
MOSFET saves space; but the complexity of the control circuitry must be increased to ensure that both MOSFETs do not
conduct simultaneously, which would result in a direct path from the input to ground. Any cross conduction would result in
lower efficiency and could even overload and damage the system.
Efficiency calculations
To calculate the efficiency of a DC/DC converter, the total power dissipation needs to be computed. The key contributors
to the power dissipation for a DC/DC converter in continuous conduction mode (CCM) are the high- and low-side switching
losses and the ICs quiescent-current loss. The formulas for these losses are as follows:
2 VOUT
PConduction _ HS = IOUT R DS(on ) (1)
VIN
Equations 1 through 3 apply to both the synchronous and the nonsynchronous converter in CCM. However, the losses in
the low-side MOSFET for the synchronous buck converter (Equation 4) and in the low-side power diode (PD1) for the non-
synchronous buck converter (Equation 5) need to be included:
2 VOUT
PConduction _ LS = IOUT R DS(on ) 1 + ( 2 t Delay fSW IOUT VFwd ) (4)
VIN
V
PD1 = VD1 _ Fwd IOUT 1 OUT (5)
VIN
In Equation 4, the first component represents the con- reduced to improve thermal performance so that a less
duction loss in the low-side MOSFET, and the second com costly package can be chosen to house the smaller power
ponent represents the conduction loss in the body diode. MOSFET with a higher drain-to-source resistance.
The current flowing through the body diode is about an
order of magnitude lower than the current flowing through Efficiency results at high loads
the low-side MOSFET and is negligible at 2 A. Two circuits were built with the devices shown in Table 2
These equations make it evident that there are several so that the efficiencies of the circuits could be compared.
factors influencing full-load efficiency, such as the drain- The devices used the same LC filter in the bill of materials.
to-source resistance, drain-to-source forward voltage, duty Even though the two devices had slightly different fixed
cycle, frequency, and power MOSFET rise and fall times. switching frequencies, there was not enough impact on
The AC and DC losses of the inductor and the equivalent circuit efficiency to alter the conclusion of this demon
series resistance of the output capacitance are similar in stration. An input voltage of 12 V was chosen, and effi-
the application, since the same LC filter can be used for ciency measurements were taken by simply varying the
both devices. For a DC/DC converter, the duty cycle is output voltages.
given, and only the drain-to-source resistance, forward
voltage drop, and switching frequency can be chosen. Table 2. Basic device characteristics
Typically, the MOSFET rise and fall times are not stated in PART HIGH-SIDE RDS(on) LOW-SIDE RDS(on) FREQUENCY
the data sheet but are important specifications to consider, NUMBER (mW) (mW) (kHz)
since the faster they are, the less power is dissipated. The TPS54325 120 70 700
trade-off is noisy ringing at the switch node when a power N/A
MOSFET is turned on too quickly. Start-up time can be TPS54331 80 570
(VD1_Fwd = 0.5 V)
16
Figure 2 shows the efficiency of both devices with a of the TPS54331 improved dramatically. In this case, the
12-V input and a 1.5-V output. The figure clearly shows duty cycle was 21%, and the two full-load efficiencies
that the TPS54325 had higher efficiency at full load. Since were nearly the same. The power diode of the nonsyn-
the duty cycle was 12.5%, the power diode of the nonsyn- chronous device conducted less often, and the high-side
chronous solution with the forward voltage drop of 0.5 V MOSFET with low ON resistance conducted more often.
dissipated more energy than the 70-mW MOSFET, despite When the dissipation of the low-side power diode was
the TPS54325s high-side drain-to-source resistance. lower at higher duty cycles, the nonsynchronous solution
Figure 3 shows the efficiency of both devices with a 12-V became more efficient.
input and a 2.5-V output. It is evident that the efficiency
90
80
70
60 TPS54331
Efficiency (%)
(Nonsynchronous)
50
40
30
20 TPS54325
(Synchronous)
10
0
0.001 0.01 0.1 1 10
Output Current (A)
90
80
TPS54331
70 (Nonsynchronous)
Efficiency (%)
60
50
40
30 TPS54325
(Synchronous)
20
10
0
0.001 0.01 0.1 1 10
Output Current (A)
17
0
Time (t)
18
Internet
TI Semiconductor Product Information Center Home
Page
support.ti.com
Eco-mode and SWIFT are trademarks of Texas Instruments. Acrobat and Reader are regis-
tered trademarks of Adobe Systems Incorporated. ENERGY STAR is a registered mark owned
by the U.S. government. All other trademarks are the property of their respective owners.