By: Jen Classen & Lindy Lee

District Name:
Evaluator(s):
Stage 3: Significant
Timeframe Stage 1 : Beginning Stage 2: Progressing Stage 4: Proficient Comments
Progress
Vision aligns with district, state,
county, and local school board
standards/policies. Incorporates
Vision aligns with district, state, and
Vision aligns with district and state administration, teacher, staff,
1st month Vision/Objective(s) Vision is weak and lacks clarity.
standards
county standards. Objectives relate
student, family, and community
to accomplishing the vision.
member perspectives. Objectives
are clear, concise, and directly relate
to accomplishing the vision.
Budget has been planned and
incorporated into the technology
Budget includes general categories plan, LCAP (Local Control
Budget only covers the first buying of purchases with the possiblities of Accountability Plan-CA thing). All
No planning has been set aside for
Months 2 - 3 Budget the budget.
wave and immediate needs to successive wave purchases. No expected purchases such as
support this part of the roll-out. consideration to sustainability or hardware/software/PD have been
future buying cycles is mentioned. included. Budget accounts for
possible future purchases through
renewal/sustainability.
Well-defined dates. Roll-out includes
planning meetings, pilot phase,
Roll-out contains approximate dates evaluation, 2nd, 3rd or 4th phase if
Little to no timeline. Just discussion-- for phase completion with no Roll-out contains approximate dates needed. It will be determined if there
Month 4 Timeline no actual dates set. recommendation for planning for phases with planned meetings. is a need for teachers to receive the
meetings. devices well ahead of students to
start professional development prior
to implementation into classrooms.
Infrastructure is solid, sound, fast,
Infrastructure is patchy across the Infrastructure covers most of the and reliable. It can support the
Infrastructure does not support the district for supporting roll-out. district for supporting the roll-out. incoming technology. Firewall and
Months 5 - 7 Infrastructure technology. Infrastructure has regular down There are occassional, but irregular filters will integrate with new
times. downtimes. technology and is Child Internet
Protection Act (CIPA) compliant
Evaluation system is basic in Thorough research done on
Evaluation system lack detail about
covering areas to check with little incoming technology. All facets of
what is expected in terms of
detail of what to look for. needs such as infrastructure,
Little to no minimal evaluation hardware, infrastructure, and
Month 8 Evaluation devices or research. school/classroom implementation.
Stakeholders will be given results of hardware/software, and PD have
evaluation but don't necessarily have been evaluated. All stakeholders
Stakeholders will receive a brief
a role in deciding what the evaluation have been involved in the evaluation
synopsis of evaluation results.
will contain. process.
District-wide policies are specific and
clear in regards to proper use,
inappropriate use, methods of
District-wide policies are clear in
District-wide policies are general and dispersal, methods for requesting
regards to proper use, inappropriate
only mention few of the following repairs, numbers of "loaner" devices,
use, methods of dispersal, methods
District policy is non-specific topics: appropriate use, and inventorying. District policies are
Procedures and for requesting repairs, numbers of
Months 2 - 7 regarding device usage, inappropriate use, methods of
"loaner" devices, and inventorying.
created through the decision-making
Policies maintenance, and inventorying. dispersal, methods of requesting model with the participation of district
District policies are created using
repairs, numbers of "loaner" devices, personnel, school administration,
limited district and school-based
and inventorying. teachers, staff, students, families,
personnel.
and community members. District
policies allow for individual school-
specific policies as well.
Pilot is unclear of expectations or Extensive, well-reseached and
Pilot results do not meet intended
expected outcomes. Few personnel piloted. Incoming technology has
objectives for determining
Pilot: First Little to no piloting of incoming are involved in determining been evaluated by district teachers.
Months 9 - 14 technology.
success/failure. District teachers do
success/failure of pilot program. It will have already been determined
Purchase not necessarily receive results of
District teachers receive brief if teachers will receive devices prior
pilot.
synopsis of results of pilot. to students receiving them.
 Reoccuring professional
Single on-site professional development that promotes and
Reoccuring professional
development occurs that trains staff creates on-site experts through
development is budgeted for. PD
Professional superficially on technology. Little to teachers. School staff supported in
Little to no professional development includes how to implement
Months 9+ is planned and/or budgeted for.
no promotion of how to implement
technology into different classrooms.
working collaboratively to implement
Development into classrooms nor creating experts technology into their classrooms.
No expert teachers are promoted nor
among the staff or collaborative Initial budget includes a section for
are collaborative communities.
communities. reoccuring professional development
over the course of years.
Re-evaluation does not include Re-evaluation process makes few Very thorough, extensive re-
results of pilot program. decision adjustments due to the evaluation of pilot process. All
Little to no re-evaluation and
Month 15 Re-evaluate/Refine refinement.
Stakeholders only receive a synopsis results of to pilot program. Few stakeholders have provided input
of decisions made during the re- stakeholders are involved in the and detailed ways to refine the roll-
evaluation. decision making process. out of incoming technology
2nd Wave purchase was budgeted
2nd Wave 2nd Wave purchase results in large 2nd Wave purchase results in for in the initiial discussion;
Little to no plan on how to obtain
Second Year funding for 2nd wave purchase.
differences in what was originally differences in what was originally thoroughly planned out in budget
Purchase budgeted. budgeted. and is incorporated in tech plan and
LCAP
3rd Wave purchase was budgeted
January of Little to no plan on how to obtain 3rd Wave purchase results in large 3rd Wave purchase results in for in the initiial discussion;
3rd and 4th if
Second year or funding for 3rd and 4th wave diferences in what was originally diferences in what was originally thoroughly planned out in budget
needed purchase. budgeted. budgeted. and is incorporated in tech plan and
later LCAP
Refresh cycle has been well-planned
After every Refresh cycles are funded in the out and incorporated into initial
Refresh cycles are briefly discussed
evaluation Refresh cycle and Little to no plan on how to obtain
in budget with some consideration
initial budget. Stakeholders are only budget; all stakeholders have been
occuring after a repeat funding for refresch cycle. informed about the refresh informed and are a part of the
on obtaining future funds.
purchasing. decision making process about the
purchase wave. refresh cycle