Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Classification/MAK value:
a) colloidal amorphous silica
including pyrogenic and wet
process silica (precipitated
silica, silica gel) and
3
diatomaceous earth (uncalcined) 4 mg/m total dust
evaluation period 8 hours
b) quartz glass, fused silica,
silica fume and calcined
3
diatomaceous earth 0.3 mg/m fine dust
evaluation period 8 hours
Chemical name (CAS): silica
CAS number: 7631-86-9
Molecular formula: SiO2
Synonyms: quartz glass: vitreous silica
silica glass
diatomaceous earth: kieselguhr
fused silica: opal
flint
Characteristics: bluish-white or grey powder
Crystal system: amorphous
Molecular weight: n (60.09)
3
Density: 1.90 to 2.20 g/cm
Refractive index: 1.45
Melting point: 1710 C
Boiling point: 2230 C
* In this report the term "amorphous" is considered to be synonymous with "not crystalline" and
"X-ray amorphous".
158 Silica, amorphous Volume 2
** It seems to be very unlikely that these kinds of glass have fibrogenic effects since such effects
did not come to light in extensive animal experiments and epidemiological studies to clarify the
question of a carcinogenic potential of man-made mineral fibres [1]. The epidemiologists con-
cluded "that there are diffuse pulmonary findings related to exposure which are at the bottom
end of the reaction scale and can only be detected with radiographic methods" and, summariz-
ing, there is still no evidence from long term exposures for clinically relevant disorders of the
respiratory organs. The conclusions from the inhalation studies with rats were also that
exposure to man-made mineral fibres does not cause progressive fibrosis
Volume 2 Silica, amorphous 159
probably used for filtration aids and most of that is calcined and activated, only a small
fraction being used as dried diatomaceous earth. This will also be the case for filler and
insulation materials.
1.6 Uses
Amorphous silicas are used for a multitude of different purposes [3]. They serve as
reinforcers/fillers in the indiarubber industry and as additives in varnishes, paints and
glues. In addition, amorphous silicas are used in the production of free-flowing powders
for foodstuffs, animal feeds, pharmaceuticals and cosmetics. Adsorbents and insulation
materials are more recent applications. The ability of amorphous silicas to modify flow
properties (thixotropism) is put to use in paint production. Paints should be as easy as
possible to apply, which requires a low viscosity, and once applied should remain on the
painted surface without dripping or forming runs, for which a high viscosity is
necessary.
The properties of amorphous silicas have led to their wide distribution as technical
additives, e.g. in resins. Silicas are added to unsaturated polyester resins (UP resins) and
epoxide resins to adjust their viscosity for industrial applications involving laminar
processes. The rheological properties play a role in mixtures with PVC plastisols for the
production of imitation leather and of underbody protective coatings. Other areas of
application include pharmaceuticals and cosmetics. Amorphous silicas serve to adjust
the viscosity of creams, ointments, suppositories and pastes. Finally they are used in the
production of moulds.
Quartz glass is used mostly in the field of vacuum and irradiation technique to
produce UV lamps, lens and prism systems as well as in high frequency installations for
high voltage insulators. Fused silica finds application particularly in the production of
laboratory glass and chemical apparatus.
Table 1. The classification of X-ray amorphous silicas according to [7] and [8]
synthetic products: quartz glass from rock crystal just above the melting point (1750 C),
e.g. melted in crucibles.
amorphous quartz made by grinding rock crystal.
amorphous quartz glass as in sections I and II, tempered above
ca. 700 C. On prolonged heating, especially at high temperatures,
SiO2-forms which can be detected by X-ray diffraction are formed.
SiO2 fume, in which short range order cannot be excluded, can arise as
a by-product during electrothermal production of silicon compounds
and alloys from quartz sand (e.g. ferrosilicon and silicon carbide). This
is probably also the case for arc furnace silica.
3 Exposure to Dust
Elevated concentrations of fine synthetic colloidal silica dust can arise during production
and during mixing of silica with other substances. Because of the multitude of different
applications, fine dust containing silica can occur in very many areas of industry.
Especially hydrophobic products have a strong tendency to produce dust. After
integration into the final product, a hazard from SiO2 is no longer likely. Measurements
of total dust concentration during production of Aerosil [4] reveal a decrease from
"up to 100 mg/m3" in 1959 to
"up to 42 mg/m3" between 1974 and 1982.
Measurements carried out in 1984 and 1986 revealed average values of 2.2 mg/m3
and 4.4 mg/m3 total dust. At the same time a total of 27 measurements of fine dust
concentration were obtained using a horizontal elutriator. The results were in the range
0.7 mg/m3 to 1.7 mg/m3 fine dust for 1984 and 1986.
56 measurements of dust levels in works where amorphous silica (quartz glass) was
processed showed fine dust concentrations between 0.04 mg/m3 and 1.9 mg/m3 with an
average of 0.46 mg/m3. The quartz content was between 1 % and 12 % w/w [10]. In the
course of these measurements an attempt was made to estimate the level of amorphous
silica by infrared spectroscopy because no other analytical method was available for this
purpose [11]. However, considerable limitations with respect to the precision of
measurement and to interference had to be taken into account. There are practically no
dust concentrations available for the ferrosilicon industry. For the area of the blast
furnace outlet fine dust concentrations of 2.14 mg/m3 to 19.5 mg/m3 are quoted (n = 5
measurements). The proportion of X-ray crystalline silica ranged from < 1 to 2 % w/w,
of amorphous silica from 30 to 100 % w/w [12].
4 Effects on Man
Of a group of 108 Mexicans who were exposed to amorphous silica during mining of
diatomaceous earth, 66 % had developed pneumoconiosis [13]. Unfortunately, details of
the source of the study collective and of their other occupational exposures, especially to
quartz dust, are not given.
A number of authors report the occurrence of lung X-ray findings specific for
pneumoconiosis induced by diatomaceous earth. In one study, 8 % of those persons for
whom the findings were conspicuous were shown in the occupational anamnesis to have
been exposed as packers of diatomaceous earth [14]. The X-ray findings included the
bilateral linear changes which are typical of diatomaceous earth pneumonconiosis. In
addition, coalescent lesions which might result from pulmonary infections, especially
tuberculosis, were present.
15 severe cases of pneumonconiosis in two factories were reported in workers
producing filter candles from a material containing 80 % diatomaceous earth [15]. The
authors distinguish between mild silicosis, which is observed after exposure to native
diatomaceous earth, and the severe silicosis occurring here which is caused by
diatomaceous earth which has been heated to 1250 C and so contains cristobalite. Since
1931, all cases of silicosis in Sweden have been recorded in a central register [16]. The
register contains a total of 6 cases for which the exposure involved diatomaceous earth.
Here too it is emphasized that calcined diatomaceous earth is particularly dangerous.
The relationship between pneumoconiosis findings in the X-ray examination and
working conditions of the persons examined was studied for a collective exposed to
diatomaceous earth (diatomete workers) [17]. The lung radiographs from 869 employees
from 5 firms (95 % of the total work force) were evaluated. In 78 (9%) of the employees,
doubtful evidence of pneumoconiosis was found. For a second group of 78 persons there
was definite evidence of diatomaceous earth pneumoconiosis. Of these 78 persons, 32
(3.7 %) had confluent disease. The places of work were classified as quarry, mills, office
and administration. In the mills, mild pneumoconiosis was diagnosed in 17 % of
employees with 5 or more years exposure and in 23 % severe pneumoconiosis (confluent
disease). Only 0.4 % of persons employed for shorter periods had mild pneumoconiosis
and none had the severe disease. The situation was similar for persons working in the
quarries. For the X-ray findings in "diatomitis-pneumoconiosis" the authors propose
their own classification system which involves quantification of linear-nodular lesions
into grades LN1 to LN3 with or without additional confluent shadows C1 to C4. They
emphasize, however, the diversity of methods employed in extraction and processing
and the consequent possibilities for modification of simple diatomaceous earths, e.g., the
formation of 40 % to 60 % cristobalite during calcination. Thus it is not unreservedly
possible to conclude from the occurrence of "diatomete-pneumo-coniosis" that it is an
effect of amorphous silica, i.e. of quartz-free, uncalcined diatomaceous earth.
12 patients with silicosis were found among the 106 workers of 6 factories producing
diatomaceous earth in Migaji-Kun, Japan [18]. The silicosis was of grade 3 according to
the rntgenographic classification of Nozaki. The shortest exposure time among the
patients was 3 years. The diatomaceous earth was 86 % SiO2. The dust concentration was
determined with a method which is no longer used. Quartz was not present. No details
were given as to the method used to exclude the presence of quartz.
Volume 2 Silica, amorphous 165
X-ray analyses were carried out on samples of diatomaceous earth from 6 producers
to determine the quartz content of natural uncalcined diatomaceous earth [19]. 1 % to
8 % w/w quartz (low quartz) was found. These authors too conclude that a fibrogenic
effect of diatomaceous earth can be put down to amorphous silica only if the absence of
crystalline silica has been definitively proved.
4.2 Effects of silica fume, flying ash, filter dust and fused silica
Kasuistics are available for a collective of 40 workers from a metallurgical works in the
ferrosilicon industry [20]. The individuals had been employed in the production of
ferrosilicon (silicon metal) for various periods during 11 to 18 years, but never for more
than a total of 2 years at the furnace. In this process, quartz is heated in an arc furnace to
above its melting point to 2350 C. A considerable fraction of the vaporized SiO2 (12 to
14 tons daily) escapes as fumes into the flue or into the air breathed by the workers. X-
ray diffraction analysis revealed the presence of crystalline silica. Lung X-rays showed
changes in 11 of the 40 exposed persons. Unfortunately, no details are given of other
occupational exposures, particularly of exposure to quartz or of other previous
exposures. A Letter to the Editor in response to this publication points out that 6.7 %
w/w crystalline silica was found by means of X-ray diffraction in the dry lung tissue of
dead members of this collective. That is enough to produce nodular fibrosis [21].
Other studies have also produced indications of a weak silicosis-inducing effect of
dusts in ferrosilicon works. Here too, however, the dust situation is such that exposure to
crystalline forms of SiO2, particularly of persons charging the blast furnace, cannot be
ruled out [2224]. Toxicological investigation of the amorphous silica fume on the outlet
side of the furnace revealed a weak fibrogenic effect [25, 26]. The relationship suggested
by the term "ferro alloy workers' disease" between an exposure to high doses of
amorphous silica fume during ferrosilicon production and an initial metal-fume fever, on
the one hand, with a subsequent pneumoconiosis on the other is also not able to exclude
the possibility of an exposure to mixed dusts including crystalline silica [27, 28].
Cases of silicosis are also known from the production of fused silica tubes for blast
furnaces [29]. In this works, amorphous silica imported from America is milled in ball
mills, poured into moulds as a suspension in water and then fired at 1100C. Further
processing is not carried out. In addition, for quality control purposes, continual infrared
spectrophotometric and roentgenographic analyses ensure that crystalline silica and, in
particular, cristobalite are not present in the starting material. There were radiographic
findings indicative of silicosis in 4 of 28 employees of the company (14 %). The period
of exposure to the dusts produced during milling ranged from 2 to 32 years for the 28
employees, on average 8.9 years.
166 Silica, amorphous Volume 2
Table 2. Complaints and symptoms (X-ray findings and ventilation disorders) in n = 143
employees at an Aerosil works [30].
measured. Markedly reduced total dust concentrations of 2.2 and 4.4 mg/m3 were found
with fine dust levels of 0.7 and 1.7 mg/m3, respectively. From these data the fine dust
concentration for the period 1974 to 1982 can be estimated as approximately 6 mg/m3. It
is, however, hardly possible to make retrospective estimates of how much higher the
average fine dust levels might have been at earlier times.
The evaluation of medical records for 78 employees exposed to amorphous silica
(HiSil and Silene) has also been reported [31]. The exposures took place between 1941
and 1959. The dust concentrations ranged from 0.1 to 65 mg/m3. No changes were found
on the radiographs. There were no signs of a silicosis nor of any other pulmonary
diseases.
Furthermore, there are reports of an investigation of 165 employees who were
exposed to precipitated amorphous silica (PAS) in two firms [32, 33]. The dust
concentrations, measured using personal samplers, were about 1 mg/m3. It is not clear
whether this was fine dust or total dust. The minimum exposure period was 1 year, the
average 8.6 years. The authors evaluated spirograms, respiratory questionnaires and
radiographs. They found no relationship between the lung function parameters and the
results of the X-ray examinations on the one hand and the intensity and duration of the
PAS exposure on the other. Correlation between a series of symptoms such as cough,
phlegm, respiratory difficulties and wheezing and the PAS exposure was non-existent or,
at best, negative. The respiratory symptoms did, however, correlate with the smoking
habits.
research into the origins of silicosis, for at that time the silica going into solution at the
surface of the quartz was considered to play an essential role in the aetiology of quartz-
induced fibrosis (solubility principle). Other information has been obtained from
occupational hygiene studies which sought primarily to clarify the question of a
fibrogenic effect of amorphous silica.
The available studies include investigations using various kinds of parenteral
application as well as specific toxicological evaluations of the effects of inhalation of
amorphous SiO2 in the rat, rabbit, guinea pig and monkey. Not only has the biological
effectiveness in producing progressive fibrosis been investigated in long term
experiments but also the elimination behaviour of the dusts. Various synthetic amor-
phous silica products derived from the most widely available pyrogenic amorphous
(hydrophilic) silicas have been tested. An important distinguishing characteristic of these
silicas is their specific surface area. Furthermore, some of the products are hydrophobic
because the external reactive groups are occupied. There are also experiments with
quartz glass, with mixed oxides of amorphous silica as well as with the waste products of
the ferrosilicon industry and of quartz glass production.
Experiments have been carried out on the effects of the various forms of silica after
intratracheal injection into animals in the Federal Republic of Germany as well, e.g.,
with silica gel, a pure amorphous hydrated form of silica, with opal, flint and quartz [25,
55]. The solubility of the dusts and their fibroblastic and toxic effects were compared.
Here too it was demonstrated that the toxicity increased and the fibroblastic effects
decreased with increasing solubility of the SiO2 dusts. Thus the silicas could be placed in
order of decreasing toxicity and increasing fibroblastic activity: silica gel, opal, flint,
quartz (see also Section 5.2, Acute toxicity). Opal, with its low degree of crystallinity, is
comparable in its effects with quartz glass: grade II fibrosis according to Belt and King
(cited from [35]).
In another study, groups of 10 to 20 rats were given intratracheal injections of 40 mg
of various forms of silica [56]. The animals were observed for 1, 2, 4 and 8 months. The
lung weights, hydroxyproline levels and silica content were determined. The dusts
studied were
crystalline quartz
colloidal silica without crystalline components detectable by X-ray crystallography
quartz glass without crystalline components
silica fume from a ferrosilicon plant
diatomaceous earth without crystalline components
diatomaceous earth which had been heated to 800 C for 24 hours, also without
crystalline components.
The particle sizes in the various samples were not comparable: the quartz had a mean
diameter of 12 m and the quartz glass of 0.3 m. The author states, however, that the
particle size has no effect on the fibrogenicity. Comparison of the effects revealed that
the crystalline quartz and the quartz glass produced similar initial reactions after 1 and 2
months and that they had a greater effect than the other substances. Later, however, the
progression became slow with quartz glass and markedly less than with quartz. The other
test dusts, apart from the heated but still X-ray amorphous diatomaceous earth, had no
fibrogenic effect. The heated diatomaceous earth produced a much stronger reaction than
the untreated diatomaceous earth. In particular, the collagen production it induced in the
lymph nodes was at least as much as with crystalline quartz.
In yet another comparative study of silicogenesis [57], 12 months after intratracheal
injection of 30 mg X-ray amorphous quartz glass with a mean particle diameter of 0.23
m, fibrotic lesions arose which were described as "very similar" to those observed
under the same experimental conditions with crystalline quartz. The quartz sample was
ground rock crystal with a mean particle diameter of 0.44 m. On the basis of this
experiment quartz glass was said to be just as fibrogenic as quartz. The criticism is
warranted, however, that these observations are not based on accepted toxicological
parameters.
Silica, amorphous
size
amount 16 g/ml 36 g/ml 58 g/ml 40 g/ml 54 g/ml 100 g/ml 94 g/ml 14 g/ml 4 g/ml 3 g/ml 13 g/ml
dissolved in 6 h
in 24 h
171
also given. For Bayer-SiO2 and Aerosil, tempering causes an increase in particle size by at least a factor of 10 [5].
172 Silica, amorphous Volume 2
was studied [58]. Both the various forms of quartz and quartz glass caused similar
weight changes.
In comparative experiments with rats, a total of 11 different silicas were tested by
intraperitoneal injection of 50 mg/animal [5]:
2 commercially available amorphous silicas, (1) precipitated amorphous silica and (2)
amorphous pyrogenic silica (Aerosil)
samples (1) and (2) after tempering for 8 hours at 800 C
silica fume
2 samples of silica gel
quartz glass from ground quartz fibre glass
the same quartz glass tempered for 48 hours at 1100 C
quartz (rock crystal)
calcined diatomaceous earth.
Both the calcined diatomaceous earth and the tempered quartz glass contained
cristobalite. In contrast, the tempered Aerosil remained amorphous according to both X-
ray and electron diffraction. The tempered (precipitated amorphous) silica, on the other
hand, revealed some weak cristobalite lines. Both these samples had been sintered to
hard-baked agglomerates or larger melted particles.
The criterion chosen for evaluation of the dusts was the progression of the induced
fibrosis. The histological changes after 2, 4 and 8 months were scaled into one of 6
grades after staining the tissues with haematoxylin-eosin-azocarmine-aniline blue and
Gomori stain (Figure 1). Progressive fibrosis with the development of cell-free collagen
hyaline nodules was only observed with the crystalline samples of quartz, quartz glass
and diatomaceous earth and with the two silica samples which had been tempered at 800
C. In Figure 1 it may be seen that all these samples produced a grade VI tissue reaction
after 4 and 8 months. A certain amount of fibrosis developed in the other experiments
too. The intensity and persistence increased from the silica gels to the untreated
precipitated and pyrogenic amorphous silicas to the silica fume. The silica fume
occupies a position between the amorphous and the crystalline SiO2 forms. The effect is
initially tempestuous and very violent; later the nodules regress.
The cell damage and increase in connective tissue induced by quartz fibre glass is
unexpectedly slight. Since Strecker obtained completely different results with quartz
glass, results which, in our experience, could be confirmed with scrap glass from
Heraeus, Klosterktter concluded that there must be marked differences between quartz
glass samples [5].
the lung parenchyma were sometimes observed in the rats. All these changes, including
the pulmonary distension, were reversible after termination of the exposure. In the
experiments with pyrogenic amorphous silicas, genuine fibroblastic lung reactions were
never observed [47, 48, 50]. In toxicological studies of hydrophobic colloidal silica,
inhalation of high concentrations (100 mg/m3) for several months also led to
desquamative catarrh and macrophage granulomas with slight reticulin fibre formation.
These changes too regressed completely in the postinhalative phase of the experiment. In
contrast to these findings, one of the colloidal silicas tested, produced by the arc furnace
method, was clearly shown to induce silicosis; this product never became commercially
available [59].
Quartz glass (X-ray amorphous, "VP 203-006") was compared with quartz in an
inhalation study with rats to investigate the effect of increased pressure [60]. The dust
concentrations tested were 10 mg/m3 and exposures lasted for a total of 84 days. Organ
weights and qualitative histologically detectable lesions in the lungs and mediastinal
lymph nodes were evaluated. In addition, the fine tissue changes were analysed
histomorphometrically. Nodular lung lesions with connective tissue formation were
established for both kinds of SiO2: about twice as many for quartz as for quartz glass. A
similar difference was seen in the lymph node weights. Histologically the lymph nodes
from the quartz glass animals contained more hyaline collagen fibres (some actually
organized in concentric layers) than did the lymph nodes from the quartz series.
More recent unpublished studies tested the effects of colloidal amorphous silicas in
an inhalation test in the rat [53]. An untreated pyrogenic silica (Aerosil 200) at
concentrations of 1, 6 and 30 mg/m3 total dust, a surface-modified pyrogenic silica
(Aerosil R 974) and a precipitated silica, both at concentrations of 30 mg/m3, were
tested. The effects were compared with those of inhalation of 60 mg/m3 quartz. Exposure
was for 13 weeks, 5 days per week and 6 hours per day. In the subsequent 52 week
observation period
mortality
respiration rate
weight of body, lung and thymus
blood and urine status
lung levels of collagen and SiO2
pathological modification of the respiratory tract
were investigated. The effects observed included:
increased respiration rate
slower body weight gain
markedly increased lung weight
increased leukocyte count
increased collagen level
granulomatous changes
focal interstitial fibrosis
necrosis and slight atrophy of the nasal mucous membrane.
In general the findings were most pronounced with untreated pyrogenic silica and
least with precipitated silica. The precipitated silica, however, was retained in the lung
and lymph nodes to a far greater extent than the treated and untreated pyrogenic silica.
174 Silica, amorphous Volume 2
After as little as three months exposure to 6 mg/m3 total dust, "focal interstitial
fibrosis" was seen in some animals. This effect too was most pronounced with untreated
pyrogenic silica (Aerosil 200) and least with silica gel. It is not possible to assess the
significance of this effect unambiguously because it was completely reversible. The
authors' interpretation, that there is a threshold concentration for adverse effects below 1
mg/m3 total dust (Aerosil 200), can only apply to the reversible increases in lung weight,
collagen level and alveolar cell number found after inhalation of 1 mg/m3 untreated
pyrogenic silica. Furthermore, in all groups at the end of the exposure, focal necroses
and slight atrophy of the olfactory epithelium of the nose were observed; at later times
these changes were not registered.
Effects of chronic inhalation of various synthetic amorphous silicas were studied in three
different species [61]. Three kinds of amorphous silica, silica gel, pyrogenic silica
(fumed silica) and precipitated silica were used. Electron microscopic particle size
analysis showed the geometric mean diameters of the aggregates to be 0.27 m, 0.38 m
and 0.17 m. The experimental animals were rats, guinea pigs and monkeys.
Concentrations of 15 mg/m3 were used for a maximum period of 12 to 18 calender
months. Exposures were carried out daily for 5 to 6 hours on 5 days of the week. As well
as histopathological tests, lung function, respiratory mechanics (compliance, forced
expiratory volume), diffusing capacity, single breath nitrogen washout and the closing
volume. The rats were examined after 3, 6 and 12 months, the guinea pigs after 12
months exposure. The monkeys were examined after 13 months exposure to pyrogenic
silica and silica gel and after 18 months exposure to precipitated silica. The
histopathological findings were most pronounced in the monkeys. Independent of the
kind of silica administered, aggregations of mononuclear cells were apparent in the
lungs. With increasing severity of these initial changes, the substances could be placed in
order of increasing harmfulness: silica gel, pyrogenic silica and precipitated silica.
Reticulin fibres were present to a similar extent in the cell aggregates in all treated
groups. In contrast, collagen was only observed in the monkeys exposed to pyrogenic
silica. 5 % to 50 % of the cell aggregates contained collagen fibres in 6 of 9 monkeys
exposed to pyrogenic silica. In 3 monkeys, no collagen or practically none was found in
the lesions. Lung function tests (compliance, resistance) were carried out for all exposed
monkeys a total of 5 times during the experiment but were only evaluated at the end of
the study because of differences in the weight of the animals. Multivariate analysis
revealed differences in the respiratory mechanics only of those animals exposed to
pyrogenic silica and silica gel. For pyrogenic silica, the differences were also statistically
significant when the lung function parameters were analysed singly (univariate analysis).
Univariate analysis for silica gel revealed no significant differences except in two cases
where they were in the opposite direction to that expected and so were classified as the
result of random statistical error.
This inhalation study provides another indication that one of the kinds of silica
administered (pyrogenic silica) has weak nodular fibrotic effects. The macrophage
Volume 2 Silica, amorphous 175
6.3 The MAK value for quartz glass, fused silica, silica fume
and calcined diatomaceous earth
In animals, quartz glass generally induces silicosis which varies in severity from a mere
suggestion to moderate disease. In most of the studies examined here which specifically
compare the effects of quartz, quartz glass or amorphous silica, it was observed that
quartz glass is not as effective in inducing silicosis as quartz or other crystalline forms of
silica. Thus during toxicological comparison with crystalline SiO2 modifications, quartz
glass induced fibrosis which attained grade 3 less rapidly and did not progress further to
176 Silica, amorphous Volume 2
grade 4 [54]. Similar effects were reflected in the degree of tissue reaction according to
King after intraperitoneal injection of various untreated amorphous and crystalline forms
of SiO2 and of ground quartz fibre glass (Figure 1) [5]. After 2, 4 and 8 months in this
experiment, heated pyrogenic silicas had marked effects which were comparable with
the fibrogenic effect of quartz, although some of the substances still appeared to be
amorphous. Other observations indicate moderate histotoxicity after longer exposures to
X-ray amorphous silica fume and quartz glass if organ weights and collagen content are
also taken into consideration [56]. Marked collagen formation in the lymph nodes is also
conspicuous after exposure to calcined diatomaceous earth [56].
Only one study reported equal effects of quartz and X-ray amorphous quartz glass,
i.e. fused ground rock crystal. In this case, however, unlike in the studies discussed
above, a truly differentiated evaluation on the basis of accepted toxicological parameters
was not undertaken [57].
Diatomaceous earth, silica fume, quartz glass and secondarily tempered silicas cannot
be specifically identified as such. An analytical differentiation of silica fume and quartz
glass from colloidal silica can only be carried out on the basis of the appearance of
luminescence and the very much larger particle size of the dusts. These methods are not
suitable for routine analysis of the air inhaled at work. The effect of quartz glass and
tempered silica is in general less than that of quartz, particularly in the long term.
It is therefore justifiable to establish a specific MAK value for those amorphous
silicas which, in spite of being X-ray amorphous, because of the conditions under which
they originate must be considered to possess short range crystalline order and a different
range of particle sizes from the highly disperse colloidal silicas. They include quartz
glass, fused silica, silica fume and possibly also secondarily tempered silicas such as
calcined diatomaceous earth. Sufficient experience of adverse effects on man of quartz
glass, fused silica, silica fume and tempered amorphous silicas is not available.
On the other hand, there are few clear casuistics of silicosis which is unambiguously
a result of exposure to quartz glass or fused silica [29]. Animal studies provide evidence
for a fibrogenic effect which is in general weaker than that of the X-ray crystalline forms
[5, 54]. In some experiments, however, they come close to the effects of quartz (see
Figure 1). An adequate quantitative estimation of the difference in these effects from the
available animal studies is therefore not possible. The MAK value for quartz glass, fused
silica, silica fume and calcined diatomaceous earth is therefore set at 0.3 mg/m3 fine dust
with an evaluation time of 8 hours.
All the available epidemiological and animal data are based on total dust
concentrations. Some of the injurious effects were found in the upper respiratory tract
[53]. Therefore, deviating from the recommendations for fumes, only a MAK value for
total dust can be established for colloidal synthetic amorphous silicas.
Adverse effects of these dusts have not yet been observed in man [30]. In acute
toxicity studies in animals, colloidal amorphous silicas are very toxic after intraperi-
toneal or intratracheal administration [26, 3638]. There are differences between the
various kinds of amorphous silica depending on the size of the primary particle, i.e. the
specific surface area and the rate of solution: higher solution rates increase the toxicity
[4446]. This is sufficient reason to set the evaluation period at 8 hours. This is not the
case for the chronic tissue damage. As a rule, after inhalation of these silicas there are
signs of desquamative catarrh, i.e. an increase in intra-alveolar cells (mostly alveolar
macrophages). Stable emphysematous or fibrotic lesions do not usually occur. In an
inhalation study in monkeys with pyrogenic silica (15 mg/m3, 15 months), collagen
fibres were also observed in the cellular granulomas in some animals. Some lung
function parameters also differed from the control values. The significance of these
findings for man is still unclear. With the other kinds of silica tested in this study, silica
gel and precipitated silica, no adverse effects were observed.
More recent studies of pyrogenic silicas, both untreated and after secondary chemical
treatment, and of precipitated silica were carried out by means of inhalation experiments
with rats. 1, 6 and 30 mg/m3 total dust were studied for Aerosil 200 and 30 mg/m3 total
dust for surface modified pyrogenic silica (Aerosil R 974) and precipitated silica.
Untreated pyrogenic silica produced effects at a concentration as low as 6 mg/m3 total
dust [53]. "Focal interstitial fibrosis" was seen in some animals after 3 months exposure.
This effect was most pronounced with pyrogenic silica (Aerosil 200) and weakest for
precipitated silica (Sipernat 22S). It is not possible to make a clear assessment of its
significance because it regressed completely. Further studies are therefore urgently
necessary. The authors' interpretation, that there exists a concentration threshold for
adverse effects below 1 mg/m3 Aerosil 200 total dust can only apply to statistically non-
significant changes which, in the opinion of the authors, are anyway reversible. The
toxicological significance of these effects also requires further experimental study.
On the basis of these inhalation studies the MAK value for
colloidal amorphous silica
including pyrogenic silica and
wet process silica (precipitated silica and silica gel)
as well as
diatomaceous earth (uncalcined)
is set at 4 mg/m3 total dust with an evaluation period of 8 hours.
It is emphasized that, in comparison with the general threshold limit value for dust,
this value is not just numerically less by a factor of 1.5. The evaluation time is 8 hours
rather than one year and the value applies for total dust and not for fine dust.
178 Silica, amorphous Volume 2
7 References
1. World Health Organization: Report of a WHO/IARC meeting, 2022 April 1982, Euro-Re-
ports and Studies 81, European regional office, Copenhagen, DK, 1982
2. Ullmanns Encyklopdie der technischen Chemie, 4th ed., Vol. 21, p 472, Verlag Chemie, D-
6940 Weinheim, 1982
3. Degussa AG: ,,Pulverfrmige amorphe synthetische Kieselsureprodukte; Herstellung und
Charakterisierung", in: Degussa AG (Ed.): Schriftenreihe Pigmente, Vol. 32, 1977
4. Ferch, H.: Arbeitsmed. Sozialmed. Prventivmed. 22(1), 6 (1987)
5. Klosterktter, W.: in Jtten, K. W., W. Klosterktter (Eds.): Die Staublungenerkrankungen,
Vol. 3, p 326, Verlag Steinkopff, D-6100 Darmstadt, 1957
6. Brnner, H., D. Schutte: Chem. Z. chem. App. 89, 437 (1965)
7. Boden, G.: Sprechsaal 116(5), 430 (1983)
8. Boden, G.: Sprechsaal 117(5), 467 (1984)
9. Flrke, O. W., M. Schmcker: Untersuchungen an nichtkristallinen technischen Kieselsuren
unter besonderer Bercksichtigung des thermischen Transformationsverhaltens, Report from
the Institut fr Mineralogie, Ruhr-Universitt D-4630 Bochum; in cooperation with W.
Kriegeis und A. Scharmann, I. Physkalisches Institut, Justus-Liebig-Universitt D-3208
Gieen; Bochum, 31.7.1988
10. Rhl, R.: Unpublished communication presented at an information day at BG Keramik, D-
5205 St. Augustin, 6.7.1987
11. Heidermanns, G.: Unpublished communication presented at an information day at BG
Keramik, D-5205 St. Augustin, 6.7.1987
12. Prochazka, R.: Staub-Reinhalt. Luft 31(9), 361 (1971)
13. Legge, R. T., E. Rosencrantz: Amer. J. publ. Hlth 22, 1055, (1932)
14. Caldwell, D. M.: Amer. Rev. Tuberc. 77, 644 (1958)
15. Vigliani, E. C., G. Mottura: Brit. J. industr. Med. 5, 148 (1948)
16. Beskow, R.: Scand. J. resp. Dis. 59, 216 (1978)
17. Oechsli, W. R., G. Jacobson, A. E. Brodeur: Amer. J. Roentgenol. 85(2), 263 (1961)
18. Ebina, T., Y. Takase, Y. Inasawa: Sci. Rep. Res. Inst. Tohoku Univ., Ser. C 4, 65 (1952)
19. Bell, Z. G., D. D. Dunnom, H. Lott: Amer. industr. Hyg. Ass. J. 39(5), 418 (1978)
20. Vitums, V., M. Edwards, N. Niles, J. Borman, R. Lowry: Arch. environm. Hlth 32, 62 (1977)
21. Gross, P.: Arch. environm. Hlth 33, 100 (1978)
22. Pancheri, G.: Rass. Med. industr. 17, 1 (1948)
23. Jung, H., W. Dress: Bergakademie Freiberg 3, 157 (1960)
24. Bruce, T.: J. industr. Hyg. 19, 155 (1937)
25. Klosterktter, W.: in Jtten, K. W., K. Klosterktter (Eds.): Die Staublungenerkrankungen,
Vol. 2, p 73, Verlag Steinkopff, D-6100 Darmstadt, 1954
26. Swensson, A., J. Glomme, G. Bloom: Arch. industr. Hlth 14, 482 (1956)
27. Bowie, D. S. J.: Cent. Afr. J. Med. 24(5), 81 (1978)
28. Robalo-Cordeiro, A. J. A., M. F. Baganha, R. Azevedo-Bernada, A. C. P. Leite, O. R. G.
Almeida, U. F. Bairos, E. Casper, M. F. Garao, M. A. M. Lima, M. A. S. Rosa, A. F. Tega, J.
M. P. Bastos: in Beck, E. G., J. Bignon (Eds.): In vitro effects of mineral dusts, p 489, Springer
Verlag, New York, USA, 1985
29. Mohrmann, W., J. Kann: Paper read at the 25th Annual Meeting of the Deutschen Gesellschaft
fr Arbeitsmedizin in D-4600 Dortmund, p 587, Gentner Verlag, D-7000 Stuttgart, 1985
30. Ferch, H., H. Gerofke, H. Itzel, H. Klebe: Arbeitsmed. Sozialmed. Prventivmed. 22(2), 33
(1987)
31. Plunkett, E. R., B. J. de Witt: Arch. environm. Hlth 5, 469 (1962)
32. Wilson, R. K., P. M. Stevens, H. B. Lovejoy, Z. G. Bell, R. C. Richie: J. occup. Med. 21, 399
(1979)
33. Wilson, R. K., P. M. Stevens, H. B. Lovejoy, Z. G. Bell, R. C. Richie: Amer. Soc. Test. Mat.
Spec. techn. Publ. 732, 185 (1981)
34. Koppenhfer, G. F.: Virchows Arch. path. Anat. 297, 18a (1936)
35. Giese, W.: Klin. Wschr. 19(23), 558 (1940)
Volume 2 Silica, amorphous 179
completed 10.4.1989