Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Tentang Pengajar
I-02
Durasi S2, persiapan bahasa Inggris di JKT 1 tahun (IELTS), Kuliah di ITS 1 tahun,
Kuliah di NUT England 1 tahun. Estimasi Biaya kasar total 500 jt IDR
Durasi S3, persiapan bahasa Inggris di JKT 1 tahun (IELTS), Kuliah di ITS 1,5 tahun,
Kuliah di NUT England 1,5 tahun. Estimasi Biaya kasar total 600 jt IDR
Beberapa proyek simulasi yang diikuti antara lain Pengembangan Armada Tanker
Pertamina (Lab. Sea Trans. ITS), Optimasi Penjadwalan Sandar Kapal Pelindo 3
(Lab. Sea Trans ITS), Optimasi Penjadwalan Produksi DKN PAL (PPC DKN PAL).
I-03
Tentang Mahasiswa
Nama
Tahun Kelulusan
Jurusan/disiplin ilmu/Fakultas
Nilai TOEFL/IELTS
Ketertarikan Bidang/Fokus
Bidang Pekerjaan/Perusahaan Tempat Bekerja
Latar Belakang mengikuti program S2 FTK ITS
Harapan setelah selesai mengikuti program S2 FTK ITS
I-04
Ketua Kelas
Nama
Jurusan
WA group
Admin
I-05
Kesepakatan - kesepakatan
Konsultasi jika dikehendaki dapat dilakukan pada hari jadwal kuliah dan
diadakan sebelum atau setelah kuliah sesuai dengan kesepakatan
Gambaran Tugas
Pembentukan Kelompok (kelas terbagi menjadi 2 kelompok yaitu: Kelompok Jalur DOSEN
dan Kelompok Jalur NONDOSEN). Diminta setiap kelompok memilih atau mengajukan
SATU SISTEM/PERUSAHAAN yang menjadi konsentrasi kelompok (untuk dipresentasikan
dalam format powerpoint pada jadwal kuliah ke4)
Minggu ke 8 : ETS
Minggu ke 16 : EAS
I-1
PENDAHULUAN
Galangan Kapal
I-2
sebagai suatu Made-to-Order Industry
123
I-3
Ilustrasi model bisnis
I-4
Model aktifitas
Kebijakan, Batasan, Target
Kebijakan, Batasan, Target
(PENGGUNA output
Input ANDA)
Sumber Daya
Sumber Daya
I-5
Kualitas Perencanaan
SUMBER DAYA:
Jumlah Pelaksana,
Mesin, Peralatan, Perkakas, Training,
Lingkungan
1-6
SITUASI INTERNAL MANAJEMEN GALANGAN KAPAL
Organisasi *
Laporan Keuangan *
123
Kuliah ke-1 I-8
Referensi:
Semua buku, paper atau artikel termasuk di internet tentang TQM.
Seperti tetapi tidak terbatas pada:
1. Beyond TQM The Emerging Paradigm by Greg Bounds,Lyle Yorks,Mel Adams, Gipsie Ranney 1994
2. TQM for Sales and Marketing Management by James W. Cortoda 1993
3. Manejemen Mutu Total 2002 by David L. Goetsch
4. Total Quality Managemen 2001 by Fandy Tjiptono dan Anastasia Diana
5. Kaizen 1992 by Masaki Imai
6. Beberapa artikel dari Majalah/koran, dsb
Total Quality Management
This chapter explains the concepts,
principles, and philosophy of total quality
management.
Total Quality Management
The way of managing organization to achieve
excellence
Total everything
Quality degree of excellence
Management art, act or way of organizing,
controlling, planning, directing to achieve
certain goals
Definition of TQM (BS4778:1991)
A management philosophy embracing all
activities through which the needs and
expectations of the CUSTOMER and
COMMUNITY, and the objectives of the
organization are satisfied in the most efficient
and cost effective manner by maximising the
potential of ALL employees in a continuing
drive for improvement.
Total Quality Management
Quality element Previous state TQM
Definition Product-oriented Customer-oriented
Priorities Second to service and First among equals of
cost service and cost
Decisions Short-term Long-term
Emphasis Detection Prevention
Errors Operations System
Responsibility Quality Control Everyone
Problem solving Managers Teams
Procurement Price Life-cycle costs
Managers role Plan, assign, control, Delegate, coach,
and enforce facilitate, and mentor
Total Quality Management
Requires cultural change prevention not
detection, pro-active versus fire-fighting, life-
cycle costs not price, etc
Many companies will not start this
transformation unless faced with
disaster/problems or forced by customers
Effect of Quality Improvement
Conforming units 18 19
Relative cost of non-conforming 0.10 0.05
units
Productivity increase 1/18(100)=5.6%
Capacity increase 1/18(100)=5.6%
Profit increase 1/18(100)=5.6%
TQM
Customer
satisfaction SPC ISO 9000
Acceptance
Employee Sampling ISO 14000
improvement
Reliability Benchmarking
Continuous
improvement
Experimental Total
design productive
maintenance
Supplier
partnership Management
FMEA
tools
Performance
measures QFD Concurrent
engineering
Process Outputs
Work methods Products
Input
Procedures
Materials Delivered service
Tools
Info, Data In-process jobs
Production Cutting,
People Welding, etc. forms signed,
drawing completed
Money Bank
deposit/withdrawal Others
process,
Kad Pintar Application Also by-products,
Process at NRD wastes
Conditions
Problem Solving Method
Identify the opportunity (for improvement)
Analyze the current process
Develop the optimal solution(s)
Implement changes
Study the results
Standardize the solution
Plan for the future
Identify the opportunity (for
improvement)
90
20000 80
70
15000 60
50
10000 40
30
5000 20
10
0 0
Seal tape Ink stain Air > 0.5mm Seal tape Arrow tape Seal tape Ng Foreign Cartridge Leakage Ink in air Ink not insert Ink over flow Overw elding Dirty Slanting Others
w rinkle missing Ng material drop room in case
Types of Defects
Process Flow Chart Ink filling process
1 Ink case
Ink supply
Degasification tank Vacuum pressure inside ink case
BK/C/Y/M 1
(-550mmHg or lower)
2
Completed
8 Vacuum packing
Ink cartridge
assembly
Analyze the current process
No time to focus on it
Doesnt understand Old machine
the problem
Bad maintenance No ongoing group to
Dun have the math focus on this
skills for this problem
Temporary
countermeasures Short term planning
Will probably fail
mentality
just like most of
the improvement
Plan to solve
done earlier
problem before
problem clearly
defined
Develop the optimal solution(s)
To establish solutions
Recommended optimal solution to improve process
Create new process, combine different process,
modify existing process
Creativity (rubber pad adhesive, door trim)
Brainstorming, Delphi, Nominal Group Technique
Evaluate and testing of ideas/possible solutions
Implement changes
To prepare implementation plan, obtain approval,
conduct process improvements, study results
Why is it done? How, When, Who, When it will be
done?
BEFORE AFTER
O ld N ew
Monthly Defect Ratio for BH CLR Model Seal Tape Wrinkle Issue
Old palettes (nylon)
1.40% New improved palettes
1.20% (aluminium palettes)
Defect Ratio (%)
Only 36% of the firms felt that Total Quality programs boosted
their ability to compete.
Arthur D. Little Survey of 500 Firms
Customer-Supplier Partnerships
69
Strength of USA vs. Japan
Concept
Time
Good Ideas, Good Implementation are the goals of
everyone in the automotive industry
70
Seven Basic Quality Tools To
improve Process Quality
Scatter Diagrams: Plot data on a chart no attempt is
made to classify the data or massage it
Pareto Charts: Organize data on a histogram based
on frequency from most prevalent to least. Help
identify major causes or occurrences (80:20 rule)
Check Sheets: Easy way to count frequency of
occurrence by front line workers
Histograms: Categorize data is cells and plot (see if
any patterns emerge)
Run Charts: Plot data as a function of time
Cause and effects Charts: fishbone diagrams are
used to identify the root causes of a problem
Control Charts: are statistical tools used to determine
if the variation in results is caused by common or
special events
Failures in O-rings
Graph Fit of O-ring failures
Full O-ring data including no
failures
T RUN CHART
R
A
N
S
A
C
T
I
O
N
T
I
M
E Time of Day
Data Collected
From Check Sheet
Time Range (in Frequency
secs) 1
44-50 4
51-57 17
58-64 12
65-71 14
72-78 19
79-85 18
86-92 11
93-99 3
100-106 1
107-113
A Histogram
89 18
96 11
20 103 3
47
110 1
18
54
16
61
14
68
12
75
10
82
8
89
6
96
4
2 103
0 110
47 54 61 68 75 82 89 96 103 110
Be careful of Cell Size
47 1 50
35 54 4 64
30 61 17 78
25 68 12
20 5092
75 14 106
15 64
10 82 19
78
5 89 18
0 96 11 92
50
103 64 78 923 106 106
110 1
Pareto Chart (80-20 Rule)
47 1
90 54 4 120%
80 61 17
100%
70 68 12
60 75 14 80%
50
82 19 60%
40 Series2
89 18
30 40% Series1
20 96 11
103 3 20%
10
0 110 1 0%
1 2 3 4 5 6 7
85
Processing
Delays
Too much
downtime
Not user
Slow friendly
response
time
Good Good
Discussion Dissection
DRBFM DRBTR
Address any potential issues up stream at Design 83
Phase
Quality Focus At the Design Stage
Focus on
Change Points & Interface Points
84
No change No Problem
Examples:
Design change
Packaging environment
change
Usage environment
change
New manufacturing
process
New supplier
Changes
Focus on Implementation
89
Where do failures occur
Example:
Replacing a four crash sensors by a single one ..
When Failures Occur!
Why did the failure happen?
Symptoms vs. Root Causes
Root Causes (Investigate the whole chain):
Suppliers/Component failure
Design
Manufacturing
Change management
Why were not able to detect it?
Rootcause Analysis:
Why Occurred?
Why Not Detected? 91
Failure Detection 5Ws-2Hs
Who
Where
When
What
Why
How was the problem found?
How can we isolate it? Turn On / Turn Off
Focus on Implementation
Operations Management
by
R. Dan Reid & Nada R. Sanders
2nd Edition Wiley 2005
2005 Wiley 96
Competing on Quality?
High performance design:
Superior features, high durability, & excellent customer
service
2005 Wiley 97
Defining Quality 5 Ways
Conformance to specifications
Does product/service meet targets and tolerances defined by
designers?
Fitness for use
Evaluates performance for intended use
Value for price paid
Evaluation of usefulness vs. price paid
Support services
Quality of support after sale
Psychological
e.g. Ambiance, prestige, friendly staff
2005 Wiley 98
Manufacturing Quality vs.
Service Quality
Manufacturing quality focuses on
tangible product features
Conformance, performance, reliability, features,
durability, serviceability
Service organizations produce intangible
products that must be experienced
Quality often defined by perceptional factors like
responsiveness, courtesy, friendliness,
promptness, waiting time, consistency
2005 Wiley 99
Cost of Quality
Cycle is repeated
After act phase, start planning and repeat process
Procedure
2005 Wiley 110
Flowcharts
Used to document the detailed steps in a
process
Often the first step in Process Re-Engineering
Yes
No
Issue
Boarding Pass
Passenger
Boards Airplane
2005 Wiley 112
Checklist
Simple data check-off sheet designed to
identify type of quality problems at each work
station; per shift, per machine, per operator