Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Table of Contents:
1. Executive summery . 3
2. Background 4
2.a Problems . 6
3. Thesis statement .. 12
4. Literature review . 13
5. Methodology .. 20
6. Limitation and bias. 20
7. Survey sample 21
8. Data analysis and findings .. 23
9. Recommendation . 36
10. Conclusion .. 36
11. References .. 38
2
Teamwork vs Individual Work
1. Executive Summary
This thesis is all about the role in defining and describing how the teamwork is better than
the individual and it also aims to provide the better understanding that how the teamwork is
more effective than the individual work at a workplace or a business environment. The team
members may be having multiple cultures and belonging to different ethnic, racial, religious
and regional backgrounds. In this paper we shall discuss through support of opinion of the
experts with their experiences that how the teamwork benefits the business or even in any non-
profit organization.
To elaborate the study, it is required to discuss the merits and demerits of both teamwork
tasks and stages of tasks, procedural and measures of working atmosphere, entrepreneurs
communication and managers role, skills and coordination among the team workers,
creativity, innovation, motivation, perception of instructions and true understandings that what
to do and how to do and all is to be compare with the individual work so that we would be able
to understand that at the end the team work is in any case better than the individualism. This
thesis will describe the problems, benefits, and a comprehensive study of comparison and at
3
Teamwork vs Individual Work
2. Background:
The New Business Ventures and SMEs should rely on the teamwork rather than individual
because teamwork is more creative, innovative, highly responsive and helpful in achievement of
goals more effectively than the individual work. The business can have better results through
teamwork instead of individualism. The background of the study is to focus on the importance and
drawing a comparison through various valid sources to make the statement true and support the
ideology of business environment running through teamwork. The study is made after considering
The business environment can have the maximum output if its policies are made by
innovative, creative and dynamic managerial personnel instead of relying on one person
commanding and responding to every situation. These days the businesses are growing and the
community has been developing a wider entrepreneur environment that leads to the economic
growth through providing the opportunities to people and better utilization of resources. To
understand the thesis we shall have to discuss the teamwork and individual work and the pros and
cons, merits & demerits, viability and success results. We shall include the opinion of different
experts to support or negate the thesis statement with their arguments and finally we will be able
to come to a conclusion that what type of working environment is better and more rewarding. The
Capitalistic economies are relying on the entrepreneurs who are relying on the teamwork which
4
Teamwork vs Individual Work
multiplies the success of the business. It is observed in different economies where the
dependability is on individual are facing challenges and have no means to overcome the problems.
In the business of every scale especially SMEs & New Business Ventures, the team work is very
important and the coordination between every team of the business helps rapid growth of the
business. The study shall help us to find out the better way for business.
5
Teamwork vs Individual Work
2.aProblems:
Business are although more comfortable and growing in the teamwork environment however there
are certain problems that may hinder the growth of the business if not dealt with proper, prompt,
efficient strategies, decision making, policy making and implementation of measures. The first and
foremost important problem that occurs is to establish a perfect team with formation of a team
comprising multi type of people that is difficult task. The formation of different mind and behavior
people at one platform under one supervisor is tough job. It is also important to make a high
coordination among the team members through high skills of communication, understandings and
business environment. It is therefore important for the entrepreneur to form a team with utmost
care and take the measures to form a harmony between the group members. Another difficulty is
to appoint a leader of the team who would be able to manage the affairs and have the abilities to
resolve the conflicts whenever and whatever in kind arises among the team members. He must be
equipped with highly communication skills and having the ability to get his orders obeyed by the
team members. This type of appointment is usually not an easy job. The hierarchy in a business
environment is a problematic portion that can be faced by true and perfect allocation of people
towards the job. For example, while forming a team of sales staff, it is to be managed that the sale
is supposed to be spread to different cultures so the sales team should be comprising the people
6
Teamwork vs Individual Work
from maximum cultures so that they can understand and convey the demands of customers. They
can be the best player between customer and the company and if they are working like a team, they
will multiply success as they will be able to sort out the problems of maximum type of customers.
The problems faced by business while implementing the approach of team work or individual work
shall be discussed in the paper and the solution through solid studies and arguments will also be
provided.
7
Teamwork vs Individual Work
1 Creativity: the team contains high skilled people with different mentalities who have their
own approaches towards creative ideas, so the complex tasks can be achieved with the help of
multiplication of creative ideas. While individual, even he has more intellect, will not be able to
2 Innovation: The development and growth is conditional with the innovative ideas and in
a team, the business will seek a lot of innovative ideas instead in individual work, business has to
3 Facts Finding & Resolution: It is easier for a team to find the flaws and investigate the
problems from many perspectives and it allows the team to incorporate different perspectives and
cooperation with each other while in individualism, the people are working like a competition and
everyone cares only for his own so the moral and cooperation in the business environment suffer
5 Utilization of Expertise: It is more beneficial that the cross functional teams can utilize
their expertise from production, accounting and marketing to look at a problem from multiple
angles and come up with the solutions that helps the whole company rather than a single individual.
8
Teamwork vs Individual Work
The insight of different personality can be drawn upon by the project oriented teams, these
personalities include logical thinkers, creative thinkers, risk takers and the balance formers.
9
Teamwork vs Individual Work
2.c Disadvantages:
Teamwork is beneficial a lot but has few discouraging elements that can be overcome through
some cases it is observed the supervisor unnecessarily tries to implement his own decisions which
do not demoralize the others but also limit the creativity and innovative approaches of the others.
becomes difficult for the entrepreneur and most of them the cross cultural people to be combined
misunderstanding often occurs that may lead to the conflict of minds and questioned the success.
4 Lazy & Dull Workers: In few cases, the lazy and dull workers try to hide themselves
behind the efforts of the hard workers, they find shelter under the umbrella of team as they will
also be considered as the member of the team achieving the goal but in reality they were not the
10
Teamwork vs Individual Work
teamwork the decision making can take more time so it may lead to difficulties while individual
11
Teamwork vs Individual Work
3. Thesis Statement
12
Teamwork vs Individual Work
4. Literature Review
In trying to find what is best for a company there are a several things that need to be done.
Different organizations have different things that need to be done and for that each employee is
assigned a task. The major thing that needs to be found out is the comparison between the ease of
work done with a team and individually. Everyone has a different perspective about everything
and when it comes to working in a team not everyone is happy about the task.
in itself does not as a matter of course constitute a group. In this way groups of games players
can shape (and re-structure) to hone their art. Transport logistics officials can choose groups of
steeds, puppies or bulls with the end goal of passing on merchandise. Scholars in business in the
late twentieth century advanced the idea of developing groups. Contrasting assessments exist on
the viability of this new administration prevailing fashion. Some consider "group" to be a four-
letter word: abused and under useful. Others consider it to be a panacea that at long last
understands the human relations development's yearning to coordinate what that development
sees as best for laborers and as best for supervisors. Groups are particularly suitable for directing
errands that are high in multifaceted nature and have numerous free subtasks. Extensive groups
can sub-isolate into sub teams as indicated by need. (Keady & Nolan, 2003)
13
Teamwork vs Individual Work
Initially give us a chance to comprehend that groups are not the same as teams. In teams,
there are no formally chosen pioneers. Likewise, gatherings are casual social affairs of
individuals. Gatherings don't as a matter of course have an objective or a target; gatherings could
be framed for social reasons. Then again, hierarchical groups are shaped with purpose, an
objective or a mission. Colleagues are deliberately chosen so that every individual from the
group is skillful to work towards the basic target. Group pioneers are additionally chosen with
the goal that there is no vagueness on power. Parts are properly allocated to individuals from the
group so every part meets expectations in a joint effort with kindred cooperative individuals.
Groups in associations need to perform corporate objectives. While the association is center
point of all exercises, the groups are the spokes which create yield. Collaboration can yield
considerably more than a total of individual endeavors basically because of sorted out endeavors
and streamlined work forms. Work proficiency is improved and unnecessary augmentation of
associate as group. These distinctions should be determined and utilized for the group's
prudent synthesis of group is essential for its legitimate working. In constituting a group, a right
blend of specialized, interpersonal and choice making are required. As groups are different in
14
Teamwork vs Individual Work
nature, it is essential that key procedures like refereeing, interpersonal correspondence are done
productively.
order to have the capacity to distinguish changes and start programs. It is additionally imperative
to evaluate what sway a change will probably have on worker conduct examples, work forms,
responses will be and create a change program that will give support as specialists experience the
procedure of tolerating change. The system should then be actualized, spread all through the
As groups work over the move and activity stages they experience various difficulties
that emerge from the group, association, and natural connections inside which the group is
working. These difficulties can undermine group reasonability and make it troublesome for them
to perform their objectives, to a limited extent on the grounds that the difficulties make it
troublesome for groups to control their objective coordinated conduct (Peterson & Behfar, 2005).
Basically, the difficulties make unmistakable needs inside of groups that must be fulfilled for
them to be fruitful.
The significance of plainly organizing colleague parts inside of the group and adding to
an incorporated work plan to direct colleagues' activities is clear over the group's majority
15
Teamwork vs Individual Work
pioneers of arranging and outline groups in the data frameworks field, Henderson and Lee (1992)
found that pioneer practices, for example, appointing work parts and indicating methods were
connected with free appraisals of group productivity, pace, and general viability. In like manner,
researchers have observed that formal inner pioneers who structure and plan the group's errands
and work process are connected with prevalent group viability (Kane, Zaccaro, Tremble, &
Masuda, 2002) and higher appraisals of fulfillment with the pioneer (Jurma, 1978).
We have intended to take a sample of 25 participants to find out how they would like to
work in a team and individually. We have tried to find out the difference between the two and
see how people would react on each. As far as administration sources, as we noted prior, the run
authority. For instance, researchers may concentrate on formal outer pioneers, developing
administration, or shared initiative, however from time to time do they center on more than one
of these sources. Despite the fact that there are without a doubt decent motivations to concentrate
on a solitary source, one of the shocking reactions of this methodology is that the aggregate
authority limit of a group is thought little of. Considering the greater part of the wellsprings of
group authority is fundamental for adding to a complete comprehension of group authority forms
and the initiative limit inside of the group (Day et al., 2004).
16
Teamwork vs Individual Work
Groups are progressively required to perform in perplexing and element situations. This
groups. The working environment throughout today's authoritative groups highlights different
partners with some of the time conflicting motivation, high data load, dynamic situational
possibilities, and expanded beat of progress. Propels in correspondence innovation have made
the utilization of virtual groups (i.e., groups whose individuals are not physically collocated)
more down to earth and unmistakable in industry. These execution prerequisites uplift the
requirement for part coordination. Further, on account of the more noteworthy rate of progress in
today's surroundings, colleagues need to work all the more adaptively when planning their
activities.
Group initiative speaks to a third normal for successful group execution. Most groups
contain certain people who are essentially in charge of characterizing group objectives and for
creating and organizing the group to achieve these missions. These parts exist even in self-
overseeing groups (Nygren & Levine, 1996), despite the fact that the behavior of initiative parts
in such groups changes extensively from comparable parts in more customary groups. On the
other hand, the accomplishment of the pioneer in characterizing group headings and sorting out
the group to augment progress along such headings contributes altogether to group adequacy. To
be sure, we would contend that powerful initiative procedures speak to maybe the most
17
Teamwork vs Individual Work
Individuals are really the association's most important asset. Unless top administration
shows this basic conviction, groups can expect close to lip administration. Any achievement will
then be exclusively owing to the colleagues' view of the venture's estimation, their own devotion,
comprehend the dedication required for adding to an effective group and a group framework
capacity inside of the association. They must be willing to allot the vital assetswork force,
cash, self-sufficiency and power, preparing, procedure help, legitimate, PC, and data
administrations, and so on. They should likewise assign satisfactory thoughtfulness regarding the
group transform and take into account an ideal opportunity to take care of issues and attempt
arrangement
administration include impact, working with individuals, and working with powerful objective
administration. Be that as it may, the fields of authority and administration can likewise be
age-old idea that has been around for quite a long time, while administration is an idea created in
the most recent 100 years, to a limited extent from the ascent of the modern upheaval.
Managers are the general population to whom this administration errand is appointed, and
it is by and large thought that they accomplish the sought objectives through the key elements of
18
Teamwork vs Individual Work
arranging and planning, arranging and staffing, critical thinking and controlling. Pioneers then
again set a hearing, adjust individuals, spur and rouse (Kotter, 2001).
Different specialists think about that as a pioneer has soul, the energy and the imagination while
a director has the psyche, the objective and the tirelessness. A pioneer is adaptable, imaginative,
moving, gallant and autonomous and in the meantime a director is counseling, logical, planned,
In our research we will explore the difference and find out what difference there is that
can be found in between team management and individual worker. These findings will be further
5. Methodology:
As per the questionnaire, which was presented during an interview The goal is to understand
the effectiveness of teamwork over the individual work and for that purpose the interviews in the
new business ventures and SMEs have been conducted as well as the expert opinion is drawn
19
Teamwork vs Individual Work
which are collected from the journals, articles and thesis available on the internet and the resources
It was hard to find the appropriate mangers and employee that are qualified to fill out the
surveys. I want to make sure that I am targeting the qualified persons. The only limitation could
be that it was an interview which could affect the results. The participants were only 25 which
7. Sample Survey
1. How does teamwork thinking style differ the Individual thinking and how it affect the
output in an organization?
20
Teamwork vs Individual Work
2. In your opinion, to what extent the individual thinking style, after conversion into a team,
3. To what extent the team work participates in business growth as compare to individual
work?
5. Give one specific example of something you learned from the team that you probably
7. Do you think the team can better utilize the resources i.e. organization, communication,
21
Teamwork vs Individual Work
9. Do you think it is hard for a manager or supervisor to lead a team having different cultures?
10. Do you believe an individual can better perform when a task is required to creative?
As per the questionnaire, which was presented during an interview, gave a lot of thinking
perspectives. First of all, the important part was to understand that whether there is a need of
22
Teamwork vs Individual Work
knowledge or task performances. The organization that focuses on teams work and who supports
working collectively are the knowledge intensive firms. Knowledge is the most strategic resource
of any organization especially in the environment which highly competitive and turbulent.
Secondly, we need to know about the skills and abilities of our employees. Whether working as
individual or team, organization needs to identify each and every individuals skills and abilities.
While working in a team, it extensively involves Knowledge creation, knowledge sharing and
knowledge acquisition.
Teams need a knowledge workforce; they believe that knowledge management from creation till
institutionalization of knowledge is only tool for the firm to sustain its competitive advantage in
the market. Teams significantly rely upon Tacit Knowledge of the team members. For the
execution of new knowledge creation and sharing of that knowledge, the teams need to focus on
forums, blogs, virtual chats, one to one interaction and brainstorming groups that highly focus
Lastly, the interviews showed that most of the senior managers are careful enough to form a team
and maintain it. They focus on everyones culture and employees values and ethics are the
23
Teamwork vs Individual Work
Managers/HOD
24
Teamwork vs Individual Work
25
Teamwork vs Individual Work
Mean Average
5 4.625 4.5
4.375 4.25 4.37
4.5 3.875 4.098 3.94
4 3.55
3.5
3 2.35
2.5
2
1.5
1
0.5
0
Mean Average
26
Teamwork vs Individual Work
Interpretations:
As per the questionnaire and interviews, almost every high level manager supports working as a
team. They know that the future of every organization is to become a knowledge intensive firm,
and these firms who are the most successful ones. This is because managers and HOD knows that
employees satisfaction is the most important thing. Working as a team, every individuals skills
are high lightened. Employees nowadays are very demanding. They need appreciation.
Individually they will not get a chance to prove their skills, but working as a team their all aspects
27
Teamwork vs Individual Work
28
Teamwork vs Individual Work
Mean/ Average
7 6.544
6.066
5.733 5.662
6 5.333 5.133 5.083
5
4.099
4
0
HR business HR Executive Asst. HR Executive Officer HR R&D Finance Marketing
partner manager HR manager assistant Executive executive
Mean/ Average
29
Teamwork vs Individual Work
Interpretations:
Adaptability of the company relates to organizational culture, to foresee how lenient the
organization culture is and how much it supports changes. After the survey from Asst Managers
and Executives, the conclusion was drawn that team changes according to the external
environment as the teams require staying adaptable in order to survive in the market. The
interpretation of this questionnaire shows how much flexible teams are needed in these dynamic
the tacit knowledge of the firms highly expertise which should be passed upon the teams as well.
Individuals are not expert enough to manage themselves in such a dynamic condition.
30
Teamwork vs Individual Work
Team Heads
31
Teamwork vs Individual Work
Mean/Average
4.5
4
3.5
3
2.5
2
1.5
1
0.5
0
Head of Head of Head of Finance Head of Head of Global Head of R&D
Marketing team Management team Recruitment team
team team
Mean/Average
32
Teamwork vs Individual Work
Interpretations:
This part of questionnaire represents how satisfied the Heads and employees are while working in
a team. The questionnaire directly links with employees loyalty factor to the organization to what
extent the employees are committed to their jobs. The experience in years is mentioned by 3
respondents to be more than 1 year. This shows that how much satisfied are they while being a
part or head of any team. The employees who are satisfied with their jobs tend to share their
knowledge because their gains arent personal. They dont have I factor in them, they believe in
whole teams performance. Job satisfaction is directly related to Knowledge creation and
knowledge sharing. Higher the job satisfaction level within the employees more they develop and
focus upon creating new ideas and learning from others. Employees are provided with intrinsic as
33
Teamwork vs Individual Work
CEO
Mean/Average
5 4.3684
4
0
CEO
Mean/Average
CEO MALE 36 4.368421053
34
Teamwork vs Individual Work
Interpretations:
This questionnaire was only filled by the CEO to see his views about the team work or individual
assessments. He truly supported the team efforts in the organization, but also said that individual
efforts should now be neglected. The performance of the company accelerates effectively and
efficiently due to the factors discussed before and most significant are that its a learning and
Knowledge Intensive Firm. The international market clients, where competition is really high need
to be supported through collective team efforts. However every company maintains its sustainable
competitive advantage using knowledge relying with its employees working as a team, the most
significant strategic resource. Its the only resource which the competitors cant imitate. CEO
wants to continue to put efforts in building and creating teams for specific tasks so that it could
35
Teamwork vs Individual Work
9. Recommendation:
- After the data analysis, it has been proven that the team work is more favorable and perform
- Small business and companies should consider working under team control more than an
individual management.
10.CONCLUSION
After the analysis, we have come to know that the company supports team efforts rather than
individual work. From top to bottom, interviews were conducted, and team work was supported
We analyzed the company using all the aspects of Knowledge management including the four
factors: Knowledge management presence, Leadership vision, Behavior within the organization,
Employee satisfaction and commitment. After discussion of these 4 areas, we have resulted that
teamwork is at the third loop of learning. As the employees of the company are empowered to
make decisions, to create new knowledge and challenge or amend the existing policies of the
company. Companys competitive advantage is due to relying upon creation of new teamwork
36
Teamwork vs Individual Work
with knowledge and sharing of those ideas with the company which eventually lead to effective
37
Teamwork vs Individual Work
11.References:
Duggan, Tara. Differences between Individual & Team Performance Evaluations. Demand
Media.
Keady, J., & Nolan, M. (2003). The dynamics of dementia: Working together, working
Poteete, A. R., Janssen, M. A., & Ostrom, E. (2010). Working together: collective action, the
Peterson, R. S., & Behfar, K. J. 2005. Leadership as group regulation. In D. M. Messick & R. M.
Kramer (Eds.), The psychology of leadership: New perspectives and research: 143-162.
Henderson, J. C., & Lee, S. 1992. Managing I/S design teams: A control theories perspective.
Kane, T. D., Zaccaro, S. J., Tremble, T. R., & Masuda, A. D. 2002. An examination of the
Jurma, W. E. 1978. Leadership structuring style, task ambiguity, and group member satisfaction.
38
Teamwork vs Individual Work
Day, D. V., Gronn, P., & Salas, E. 2004. Leadership capacity in teams. Leadership Quarterly, 15:
857-880
Nygren, R., & Levine, E. L. (1996). Leaderhsip of work teams: factors influencing team
work teams: vol. 3. Team leadership ( pp. 67 104). Greenwich, CT: JAI Press.
Kotter, J. (1990). A force for change: How leadership differs from management. New York: Free
Press.
Kotter, J. P., (2001), What leaders really do?, Harvard Business Review, Vol. 79 Issue 11,
p.85- 96
Capowski, G., (1994), Anatomy of a leader: where are the leader of tomorrow?, Management
Management (2015)
Shu, 2004:165. BACHELORS THESIS The Role of Teamwork in Creating Customer Focus
39