Professional Documents
Culture Documents
10
11
12
13
14
REPORTER'S TRANSCRIPT OF PROCEEDINGS
15
BEFORE THE HONORABLE G. MURRAY SNOW
16
(Status Conference)
17
18
19
20
21
1 A P P E A R A N C E S
24
25
Case 2:07-cv-02513-GMS Document 1879-2 Filed 11/11/16 Page 4 of 56
CV07-2513, Melendres v. Arpaio, 11/10/16 Status Conf. 3
1 A P P E A R A N C E S
17 Also present:
Chief Robert Warshaw, Monitor - Telephonically
18 Commander John Girvin, Deputy Monitor- Telephonically
Chief Raul Martinez, Deputy Monitor- Telephonically
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
Case 2:07-cv-02513-GMS Document 1879-2 Filed 11/11/16 Page 5 of 56
CV07-2513, Melendres v. Arpaio, 11/10/16 Status Conf. 4
1 P R O C E E D I N G S
17 Dan Pochoda, and Brenda Munoz Furnish from the ACLU of Arizona.
23 and Michael Kirk from the law firm of Cooper & Kirk, on behalf
24 of Sheriff Arpaio.
11 here, and if the Court does not anticipate that this status
16 completely.
18 involve Chief Sands, but I don't know what the parties may have
20 guess I'll ask the parties: Is there any belief that anything 14:12:59
6 believe.
20 briefing on the civil contempt remedies and from the monitor's 14:14:07
23 October of 2013.
24 THE COURT: You can take your seat till I'm ready to
8 THE COURT: No, you can say it from there. Ms. Wang's
9 at the podium.
11 Honor, for the putative movants before the Court, who have
12 placed before the Court motions that include a request that all
15 THE COURT: Well, let me ask, Mr. Cooper, I didn't see 14:15:02
24 of it forward.
2 I have on that, Mr. Cooper, and see what your responses are.
5 there was ever a monitor in this case. So even assuming that 14:15:50
6 you -- your motion had merit, how would that involve the first
7 supplemental injunction?
10 to all of them, given the grounds that we have articulated for 14:16:15
17 what I was about to say, and then I'll briefly address what I
24 October of 2013.
3 the Maricopa County Sheriff's Office, they are more than two
14 for example, with the Court's order that they put into place an
25 your suggestion from back in May, and Mr. Segura is prepared to 14:18:40
Case 2:07-cv-02513-GMS Document 1879-2 Filed 11/11/16 Page 11 of 56
CV07-2513, Melendres v. Arpaio, 11/10/16 Status Conf. 10
3 supplemental injunction.
8 first instance.
10 what? 14:19:08
25 motions. 14:19:48
Case 2:07-cv-02513-GMS Document 1879-2 Filed 11/11/16 Page 12 of 56
CV07-2513, Melendres v. Arpaio, 11/10/16 Status Conf. 11
4 that they have shown no basis for the Court to suspend all
15 They have not made any showing whatsoever. And Your Honor, we 14:20:44
17 ahead and consider and rule on the request we have for the
18 resetting of deadlines.
1 supplemental injunction.
3 Mr. Segura.
5 THE COURT: Let me just tell you, Mr. Segura, before 14:21:46
16 monitor's input on, for example, on the EI- -- when the first
21 And so you can set forth what you want to set forth --
24 deadlines today.
10 Sheriff Penzone may well have different policies and procedures 14:23:42
7 you get all dressed up and have nowhere to go, I'll certainly
11 motion for stay, I suppose that will also give you time to file
12 the motion for stay if you wish to have that done. It may be
14 emergency order.
6 interrupt you.
8 motion of this kind was filed, the Court will remember, I'm
9 sure, that the Court concluded that it could not proceed, and
10 it did suspend proceedings until that motion had been teed up 14:26:34
25 the relief that has been ordered -- and again, you may not have 14:27:18
Case 2:07-cv-02513-GMS Document 1879-2 Filed 11/11/16 Page 17 of 56
CV07-2513, Melendres v. Arpaio, 11/10/16 Status Conf. 16
1 thought about it, and maybe you have -- but there was a
5 monitor, and there have been a number of programs that have 14:27:32
6 been required that are going forth, and I'm not going to
11 something you wish to brief, you may brief it. You may brief
12 any request that you have that I stay any proceedings pending a
22 your motion, but I'm not going to simply do that any more than
23 I'm going consider the motions that Mr. Segura might have
25 So to the extent that you are making any such oral 14:28:51
Case 2:07-cv-02513-GMS Document 1879-2 Filed 11/11/16 Page 18 of 56
CV07-2513, Melendres v. Arpaio, 11/10/16 Status Conf. 17
5 or docket 1853, which was a request for your motion to have 14:29:15
15 granted. 14:29:45
22 Was there any, Mr. Masterson, since you know the local rules
1 our thought that the -- that particular local rule did not
6 plaintiff did not have the authority to grant the relief that
12 defendants had complied with the rule, and I think they were
14 agreement.
18 post-hearing?
20 believe, any one issue that, having read the lodged motion, 14:31:23
22 think that's one thing that, you know, we would have at least
25 likely not something that we would have been able to resolve. 14:31:43
Case 2:07-cv-02513-GMS Document 1879-2 Filed 11/11/16 Page 20 of 56
CV07-2513, Melendres v. Arpaio, 11/10/16 Status Conf. 19
13 can either resolve those issues, and I'm sure they -- they will
15 But our motion was simply for leave to take the 14:32:22
16 discovery.
20 clear -- to us, anyway -- that any consultation would have been 14:32:40
21 futile, and not only has that been admitted here, it was
25 that to the extent you're asking for me to just indicate that 14:33:00
Case 2:07-cv-02513-GMS Document 1879-2 Filed 11/11/16 Page 21 of 56
CV07-2513, Melendres v. Arpaio, 11/10/16 Status Conf. 20
2 But it may be, as I told Mr. Masterson, that depending upon the
6 requests, and I'm denying the motion, I'm denying your motion
10 THE COURT: All right. So I'm granting 1853 and that 14:33:37
16 deadline motion.
4 that plaintiffs have had now 14 days to study the motions that
5 have been -- were lodged and now filed, and it is our request 14:34:47
11 extension?
14 the -- have the motion, they need more than another 14 days to
16 weeks.
18 till December 16th to file the response, and then do you need
21 the moment, but once we see their response, we may want to come
22 back to you.
1 defendants to reply.
10 that there may be some change in what the new sheriff may want 14:36:32
15 are the most pressing deal with data analysis, data collection, 14:36:56
20 And we've spent a considerable amount of time now meeting and 14:37:19
6 we've asked for their input on what that deadline would be. We
9 happening now. It's going to continue for the next -- for the
14 deputies.
15 We now have the second ASU report that has been shared 14:38:30
16 with the parties and with the monitor. That has a lot of the
1 report, which was filed recently. But so not only with respect
6 really the heart of the case here. It's about the agency's
10 seeing that, and it's very concerning because we're seeing that 14:39:49
12 agency-wide level.
15 of time for them to have acted on it. They are making some 14:40:04
20 allow the monitor and the parties to provide input on that, so 14:40:25
12 forward.
16 our last comments. And they are now engaging with the monitor
18 deputies.
20 that was released two or three weeks ago; I think we got the 14:42:01
25 outliers. And this is not a small number. The first report 14:42:21
Case 2:07-cv-02513-GMS Document 1879-2 Filed 11/11/16 Page 27 of 56
CV07-2513, Melendres v. Arpaio, 11/10/16 Status Conf. 26
5 you know, really, the main focus of this, has been one of the 14:42:40
11 wait until, you know, we hear from Mr. Penzone, I think this is
13 now.
15 saying with respect to the deputies that have been identified 14:43:12
21 where to start here. I guess we'll talk about the first ASU
24 report. There was some questions about how that was done and
25 the efficacy of the method in which that was done and the 14:43:58
Case 2:07-cv-02513-GMS Document 1879-2 Filed 11/11/16 Page 28 of 56
CV07-2513, Melendres v. Arpaio, 11/10/16 Status Conf. 27
5 through that process again. Since it deals with data that 14:44:17
6 occurred more than two years ago, why don't we move forward
7 into the second ASU report? So I think those issues are still
13 and Tuesday with the monitor, certain of the monitors and MCSO
16 the data and what to do with that data that's in the second ASU
17 report.
12 Both ASU reports have indicated that there has been disparate
21 and what the eventual outcome will be, the outcome being,
6 behavior.
10 THE COURT: Do you have some time line on when you 14:47:52
15 THE COURT: Do you know what they are, Chief Warshaw? 14:48:08
21 haven't received the report from the team that was there Monday
22 and Tuesday, and yesterday was their travel day, so they just
2 you have problems with those dates, you can always ask for
17 first off, I want to make one thing the clear is Ms. Wang got
19 meet and confer with them, and that's just not true. In fact,
21 these very issues, and we met together for five days during the
22 site visit with all the monitors and discussed some of these
25 seeking, the plaintiffs -- Mr. Segura asked for it during the 14:49:54
Case 2:07-cv-02513-GMS Document 1879-2 Filed 11/11/16 Page 32 of 56
CV07-2513, Melendres v. Arpaio, 11/10/16 Status Conf. 31
1 site visit, Mr. Killebrew asked for it during the site visit,
2 and Commander Girvin said, No, we're not doing it that way.
11 with the monitors how we should move forward, and I've got a
13 way we're going to do it, and we agree with that, and we're
20 and it's the basis for Mr. Cooper's motion that I have had 14:51:12
25 with the defendants, you can always seek a change in that for 14:51:28
Case 2:07-cv-02513-GMS Document 1879-2 Filed 11/11/16 Page 33 of 56
CV07-2513, Melendres v. Arpaio, 11/10/16 Status Conf. 32
1 me, but is what Mr. Masterson -- I mean, what Mr. Masterson has
4 the --
20 take -- that is going to take and has taken a lot of resources 14:52:37
21 that MCSO has put in. There are dedicated people working on it
9 revise the order I'll revise the order, on the one hand. But
15 yourselves and the monitor to the extent -- much like you have 14:53:54
17 you can agree, agree. To the extent you can't agree, note your
18 disagreement and what your positions are. And then bring them
19 to me and I will have some idea prior to the hearing what the
20 issues are, what may be reasonable, and so will you have some 14:54:14
21 idea so you can let me know what's going on. That would be my
22 suggestion.
1 the first ASU report and the second ASU report, I would expect
7 sounds like you have been working on a plan. You have a plan
9 let's see if we can't push this through and get the immediate
10 problems taken care of while we iron out the other problems, 14:55:07
16 briefly circle back on the ASU report. One thing I would just
20 They have continued to do so even after this recusal motion was 14:55:44
22 and the monitor and there has been no sense of that slowing
23 down. We want that to continue, but I'd like to point out that
25 THE COURT: Well, there isn't any more. To the extent 14:56:04
Case 2:07-cv-02513-GMS Document 1879-2 Filed 11/11/16 Page 36 of 56
CV07-2513, Melendres v. Arpaio, 11/10/16 Status Conf. 35
1 Mr. Cooper asked for the monitor to cease his operations -- and
2 I'm not sure he quite asked that -- but to the extent he did
20 into that process. And I don't mean that just because it's "a" 14:57:19
8 supposed to be done. The last thing we want is, you know, this
13 to check with Chief Warshaw or the team that was here, but my
25 assistance. 14:59:17
Case 2:07-cv-02513-GMS Document 1879-2 Filed 11/11/16 Page 38 of 56
CV07-2513, Melendres v. Arpaio, 11/10/16 Status Conf. 37
5 THE COURT: Let me just say, Mr. Segura, it does not 14:59:34
6 appear that there's any dispute among any party or the monitor
8 and that makes a lot of sense to me. Let me share with you my
10 about two things: One is the speed of response, and the second 14:59:51
15 street doing things they shouldn't be doing, that needs to stop 15:00:16
17 from you and from the defendants, about how we go about doing
5 of this stuff done. And so I ask all parties to consider that, 15:01:28
18 community involved.
25 I'll allow Ms. Johnston to address the court with additional 15:02:37
Case 2:07-cv-02513-GMS Document 1879-2 Filed 11/11/16 Page 40 of 56
CV07-2513, Melendres v. Arpaio, 11/10/16 Status Conf. 39
3 seen that the plaintiffs have had any role in delaying the
8 much time the monitor does, and so on, and we have, for the
15 We have been pushing for this since last April, and when it did 15:03:20
16 happen in July without the input of the monitor and the monitor
17 raised concerns before they went through the process and then
18 after the results of the process were seen, the -- the results
5 MR. SEGURA: Your Honor, the other request that we've 15:04:17
6 made, our understanding is the last report that was shared with
7 us, the last ASU report analyzing 2014 and 2015, was a final
10 last site visit. It was an embargoed copy that we had to then 15:04:37
11 return.
14 the final report, although that may not be the case, given what
15 Mr. Masterson said. We have now requested to see that initial 15:04:52
21 Mr. Masterson?
23 First off, and I think Mr. Segura did clarify the fact
7 intention.
14 that up. And I wasn't going to say anything about this one
15 issue I had, and I'm not going to -- I'm not going to tell you 15:06:10
16 who the issue was with, but I was working on a policy last week
20 Here's what my concern is, Here's what I'm thinking of doing, 15:06:27
22 before, you know, we launched in, Okay, here's a new draft, and
25 can't commit for everybody else, but if we could just open the 15:06:42
Case 2:07-cv-02513-GMS Document 1879-2 Filed 11/11/16 Page 43 of 56
CV07-2513, Melendres v. Arpaio, 11/10/16 Status Conf. 42
1 lines a little bit more, and I'm not going to try to hold
4 Ms. Wang, or any one of their team here when we have little
6 having to send the e-mail, then wait for the e-mail to come
10 and then pass it on to our respective teams for discussion and 15:07:13
12 triage, if we can.
14 might have said the same thing, Well, send an e-mail so I could
15 discuss it with everybody else, but now that you've mentioned 15:07:25
21 have a role and delayed this over the past three quarterly
10 cure any problems that still exist, and that should not take 15:08:19
15 will -- and I don't at present have any basis to think that 15:08:42
18 and while doing it rapidly, also take the time we need for more
19 long-term solutions.
24 can raise that with me. But unless and until -- let's not
10 about how you approach these matters going long term -- but it 15:10:09
15 least? 15:10:23
25 I'm not telling you not to do the concrete plan at all, and I'm 15:10:45
Case 2:07-cv-02513-GMS Document 1879-2 Filed 11/11/16 Page 46 of 56
CV07-2513, Melendres v. Arpaio, 11/10/16 Status Conf. 45
3 kind of show each other what you want and what you don't want,
5 that we really don't have to take up, so I'm asking you to do 15:11:04
6 that.
7 And I'm not saying that I'm trying to put anything off
11 issues are, and if I have to, I'll decide it. But I suspect
22 this process.
6 with respect to the ASU report, the first ASU report identified
13 analysis that the first report did not include. And I think
17 report.
4 organization, and they may well have different views about what
8 lower level, you can proceed. But how, really, can we proceed
11 issues.
22 those deputies are in the second report and still have not been
24 as possible to address --
2 with --
4 willing to do that.
15 Honor. 15:15:16
20 there are people involved that he can discuss this effectively 15:15:30
25 I apologize. 15:15:49
Case 2:07-cv-02513-GMS Document 1879-2 Filed 11/11/16 Page 50 of 56
CV07-2513, Melendres v. Arpaio, 11/10/16 Status Conf. 49
2 to the Court and Ms. Johnston that I had this very discussion
5 but a significant period of time, this very issue, and I asked 15:16:04
10 and hopefully we'll get some input and can move from there. 15:16:26
6 the draft, but I'll certainly think about it and let them know
10 investigations. It's been fully briefed. I've read it. Let 15:17:39
12 without prejudice.
15 for a PSB violation, it was changed from 120 working days to 15:18:00
16 180 calendar days. The time is about the same but it is more
21 can then conduct the hearings that are required and have all
22 that done within 180 days. If you can convince me that you
24 and that the extension that you're going to seek is not going
2 to it.
5 because, as you know, it was my finding that there was an abuse 15:19:00
13 that were taken into custody by the marshal are the subject of
10 motion. 15:20:55
13 material first with plaintiffs and the reasons why, and the
18 findings about the abuse of that process, but I'm not now, in
25 move the ball forward during the next status conference, which 15:21:31
Case 2:07-cv-02513-GMS Document 1879-2 Filed 11/11/16 Page 54 of 56
CV07-2513, Melendres v. Arpaio, 11/10/16 Status Conf. 53
6 9:00 a.m.
10 MS. WANG: Yes, Your Honor. And toward that end, Your 15:21:53
12 meet and confer. I didn't mean to say that the parties have
19 working out interim dates along the way toward compliance with
23 79. They had dates worked out leading up to that date. The
25 Can you just set June 30th, 2017, as the final date to reset 15:22:52
Case 2:07-cv-02513-GMS Document 1879-2 Filed 11/11/16 Page 55 of 56
CV07-2513, Melendres v. Arpaio, 11/10/16 Status Conf. 54
4 was just reset the date that they're two years out of
5 compliance with, and that's what we'll be looking for at the 15:23:13
8 you try and work it out, you can't come to an agreement, and
9 it's a matter that I need to decide, then I will decide it, but
10 I may ask you to submit written briefings so that I can look at 15:23:25
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
Case 2:07-cv-02513-GMS Document 1879-2 Filed 11/11/16 Page 56 of 56
CV07-2513, Melendres v. Arpaio, 11/10/16 Status Conf. 55
2 C E R T I F I C A T E
15
16
18 2016.
19
20
21
s/Gary Moll
22
23
24
25