Professional Documents
Culture Documents
html
Spalart, P. R. and Allmaras, S. R., "A One-Equation Turbulence Model for Aerodynamic
Flows," Recherche Aerospatiale, No. 1, 1994, pp. 5-21.
Note that this journal reference had a small typo (appendix only) in its definition of the constant
cw1 (missing square). The typo is corrected below. The original reference made use of a trip term
that most people do not include, because the model is most often employed for fully turbulent
applications. Therefore, in this "standard" representation the trip term is being left out (see
version (SA-Ia) below for the version including the trip term). As a consequence, the farfield
boundary condition must be changed from that given in the above reference. The new farfield
boundary condition is taken from the following references:
In all of the following, a "hat" is used over the turbulence field variable, rather than a "tilde" as
given in the references, for the sole practical reason that the "tilde" showed up very poorly on the
screen.
1 of 9 04/01/2010 05:46 PM
Spalart-Allmaras Model http://turbmodels.larc.nasa.gov/spalart.html
where
and is the density, is the molecular kinematic viscosity, and is the molecular dynamic
viscosity. Additional definitions are given by the following equations:
where is the magnitude of the vorticity, d is the distance from the field
point to the nearest wall, and
Note: To avoid possible numerical problems, the term must never be allowed to reach zero or
go negative.
2 of 9 04/01/2010 05:46 PM
Spalart-Allmaras Model http://turbmodels.larc.nasa.gov/spalart.html
Spalart, P. R. and Allmaras, S. R., "A One-Equation Turbulence Model for Aerodynamic
Flows," Recherche Aerospatiale, No. 1, 1994, pp. 5-21.
The equations are the same as for the "standard" version (SA), except there is an additional trip
term on the right hand side of the equation:
where:
and is the difference between the velocity at the field point and that at the trip, is the grid
spacing along the wall at the trip, is the wall vorticity at the trip, and is the distance from the
field point to the trip.
Many implementations of Spalart-Allmaras ignore the term, which was a numerical fix in the
original model in order to make zero a stable solution to the equation with a small basin of
attraction (thus slightly delaying transition so that the trip term could be activated appropriately).
It is argued that if the trip trip is not used, then is not necessary. The equations are the same
as for the "standard" version (SA), except that the term does not appear at all. Two examples
of references that use this form are:
Eca, L., Hoekstra, M., Hay, A., and Pelletier, D., "A Manufactured Solution for a
Two-Dimensional Steady Wall-Bounded Incompressible Turbulent Flow," International
Journal of Computational Fluid Dynamics, Vol. 21, Nos. 3-4, 2007, pp. 175-188.
Aupoix, B. and Spalart, P. R., "Extensions of the Spalart-Allmaras Turbulence Model to
Account for Wall Roughness," International Journal of Heat and Fluid Flow, Vol. 24, 2003,
pp. 454-462.
Based on studies (see, e.g., Rumsey, C. L., "Apparent Transition Behavior of Widely-Used
Turbulence Models," International Journal of Heat and Fluid Flow, Vol. 28, 2007, pp.
1460-1471), use of this form as opposed to the "standard" version (SA) probably makes very
little difference, at least at reasonably high Reynolds numbers, provided that the "standard"
version use the appropriate boundary condition of (or greater).
3 of 9 04/01/2010 05:46 PM
Spalart-Allmaras Model http://turbmodels.larc.nasa.gov/spalart.html
Shur, M. L., Strelets, M. K., Travin, A. K., Spalart, P. R., "Turbulence Modeling in Rotating
and Curved Channels: Assessing the Spalart-Shur Correction," AIAA Journal Vol. 38, No.
5, 2000, pp. 784-792.
The model is the same as for the "standard" version (SA), except that the term gets
multiplied by the rotation function :
where
The term represents the components of the Lagrangian derivative of the strain rate
tensor. The rotation rate is used only if the reference frame itself is rotating (note that all
derivatives should be defined with respect to the reference frame).
Catris, S. and Aupoix, B., "Density Corrections for Turbulence Models," Aerospace
Science and Technology, Vol. 4, 2000, pp. 1--11.
In this version, the diffused quantity is taken to be (the transported quantity remains as ).
4 of 9 04/01/2010 05:46 PM
Spalart-Allmaras Model http://turbmodels.larc.nasa.gov/spalart.html
There is no trip term. Note that Catris and Aupoix ignore the terms and from the original
model; all other functions and constants are the same as for the "standard" version (SA).
This version is the same as for the "standard" version (SA), except that is ignored, and the
following two variables are redefined:
Note that this method makes use of (rather than vorticity ), where:
This form of the Spalart-Allmaras model came about as a result of e-mail exchanges between
the model developer and early implementers. It was devised to prevent negative values of the
source term, and is not recommended because of unusual transition behavior at low Reynolds
numbers (see Spalart, P. R., AIAA 2000-2306, 2000). Unfortunately, coding of this version still
persists. Because this method came about through private communications, there is no official
reference for it. However, see the following for a brief description:
Rumsey, C. L., Allison, D. O., Biedron, R. T., Buning, P.G., Gainer, T. G., Morrison, J. H.,
Rivers, S. M., Mysko, S. J., and Witkowski, D. P., "CFD Sensitivity Analysis of a Modern Civil
Transport Near Buffet-Onset Conditions," NASA/TM-2001-211263, December 2001.
The equations are the same as for the "standard" version (SA), with the following exceptions:
5 of 9 04/01/2010 05:46 PM
Spalart-Allmaras Model http://turbmodels.larc.nasa.gov/spalart.html
Rung, T., Bunge, U., Schatz, M., and Thiele, F., "Restatement of the Spalart-Allmaras
Eddy-Viscosity Model in Strain-Adaptive Formulation," AIAA Journal, Vol. 41, No. 7, 2003,
pp. 1396-1399.
This version is the same as for the "standard" version (SA), except for the following changes.
First, is ignored. Second, the term
6 of 9 04/01/2010 05:46 PM
Spalart-Allmaras Model http://turbmodels.larc.nasa.gov/spalart.html
to
and
This version is the same as for the "standard" version (SA), except that the following additional
term is included on the right hand side of the equation.
If used in conjunction with SA-noft2 instead (see for example Forsythe, J. R., Hoffmann, K. A.,
Squires, K. D., AIAA 2002-0586, 2002.), the model name would become SA-noft2-comp.
7 of 9 04/01/2010 05:46 PM
Spalart-Allmaras Model http://turbmodels.larc.nasa.gov/spalart.html
This correction gives SA capability for predicting rough walls. The references are:
Note that there is a misprint in the AIAA 2000-2306 reference in eq (6). The correct expression
for is given below.
The first reference describes two different rough wall methods, one due to Boeing and one due
to ONERA. Here, only the method due to Boeing (which appears in both references) is
described. A description of the ONERA method, which also includes the use of friction velocity,
can be found in the first paper.
The roughness version is the same as for the "standard" version (SA), with the following
exceptions. To account for roughness, the distance function, which represents the distance from
each field point to the nearest wall, is augmented to read
where d is the (original) distance to the nearest wall and is the conventional Nikuradse sand
roughness scale height. Assuming that is uniform on the body, the new distance definition is
used to replace all occurrences of d in the original model. The definition of is modified to be:
with . The new definition of should not affect , so the definition of needs to be
rewritten to read:
Note that if this roughness model is applied to the (SA-noft2) version instead, then its naming
convention becomes (SA-noft2-rough).
8 of 9 04/01/2010 05:46 PM
Spalart-Allmaras Model http://turbmodels.larc.nasa.gov/spalart.html
9 of 9 04/01/2010 05:46 PM