Professional Documents
Culture Documents
FACTS:
1. Aquilino Carino filed with CFI of Laguna a petition for registration
of Lot No. 6, a sugar land.
2. In 1949, Aquilino and his brother became co-owners of the
subject land by virtue of an extrajudicial partition of the land. In
1963, through another deed of extrajudicial settlement, sole
ownership was adjudicated to Aquilino.
3. The Land Investigator Bureau disclosed the following:
The land as described in Psu-108952 is agricultural in
nature and stated the improvements located therein.
That Lot No. 6 is outside any civil or military reservation,
riverbed, park and watershed reservation and that the land
is free from claim and conflict.
That it is not inside the relocation site embarked for Metro
Manila squatter, and is not covered by any existing public
land application and no patent or title has been issued
therefor.
That applicant has been in continuous, open and exclusive
possession of Lot No.6 inherited from his mother as shown
by the Extrajudicial Partition.
That the land is declared for tax purposes under Tax
Declaration.
4. The trial court granted the land application
5. Upon appeal by the DLMB, CA affirmed the CFIs decision.
6. Hence, this petition.
Aquilino failed to submit proof of his fee simple title or
proof of possession in the manner and for the length of
time required by the law to justify confirmation of an
imperfect title.
Aquilino has not overthrown the presumption that the land
is not a portion of the public domain belonging to the RP.