Professional Documents
Culture Documents
.0 IMPACT ASSESSMENT
4.1 METHODOLOGY
The EIA matrix is a tool used in the identification and evaluation of various impacts
associated with the individual activities during the implementation of the project. The
graphical matrix presentation forms the sources and significance of the potential
impacts that may occur during the development.
During the formulation of the matrix, environmental impacts are generally classified
into seven (7) categories according to their nature and level of significance. The
seven categories are:
The completed EIA matrix for the study is presented in Table 6.1.
Some of the minor impacts of diverting Sg. Jikang may include the
followings:
The bulk of the identified adverse impacts associated with the proposed project
occur during the development stage. Nevertheless, the various activities
associated with the development stage that are addressed in this section are not
exhaustive. These activities represent only the major contributors of the
potentially significant impacts.
Most impacts associated with this stage are mainly temporary in nature, lasting
as long as the construction activities themselves. Even though some of the
impacts may be rated as adverse, they are not expected to be of much
significance in the long-term. Thus, a greater emphasis focused on those
activities, which may cause irreversible changes to the existing environment.
4.3.1 Mobilization
Heavy machinery, equipment and construction materials needed by the
project would have to be mobilized to the site. Mobilization activities
would be an on going activity throughout the duration of the project
development, though it is expected that they would be concentrated during
the early stages immediately following the commencement of construction
activities. Some temporary and minor adverse impacts are expected due
to mobilization, which includes:
Ambient noise level along the transport route may be elevated during the
mobilization exercise.
o Dislodged soil particles from the vehicles will result in dirty and
slippery public roads along the transportation corridor during rainy
period. This is particularly obvious at the entrance/exit point(s) of
the project site. Such condition is not just a nuisance but also
poses a danger to other road users.
Material Handling
Concrete Mixers
Concrete Pumps
Mobile Cranes
Derrick Cranes
Stationery
Pumps
Generators
Compressors
Impact Equipment
Pneumatic wrenches
Jackhammers & rock drills
Impact pile drivers, peaks
Other
Vibrator
Saws
Source: U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, 1972.
These impacts are temporary in nature. The main forms of waste normally
associated with construction campsite are:-
Sewage from the Workers’ Quarters and Site Office. The release of
raw sewage into nearby watercourse results in water pollution and the
propagation of disease vectors.
of drains and receiving streams and poses a danger to the workers and
the general public.
The existing traffic count conducted at Julau Feeder Road and KJD Road
showed that the local traffic are operating at LOS “A” and during
construction stage, an additional of 100 trips(worse case scenario)
contributed to the traffic will still operating at LOS “A” whereby no
mitigation measure shall be applied during the construction stage.
4.3.9 Landscaping
The impacts due to the landscaping works are expected to be insignificant
because of the relatively secluded location of the proposed site.
Nevertheless, the impacts normally associated with landscaping activities
are 1) Aesthetically unfavourable conditions at project site, and 2) The
inevitable alteration to the landscape of the immediate areas following the
implementation of the project, from that of hilly landscape to typical
secondary school features.
The impacts during the occupational stage relate to the various activities
associated with daily routine and functions of the communities, in addition to
product trading and services within the project area as well as its interaction with
neighbours.
where: SFi = total service flow rate (pcph) in both directions for
prevailing roadway and traffic conditions, for level-of-
service i;
(v/c)i = ratio of flow rate to ideal capacity for level-of-service i;
fw = adjustment factor for narrow lanes & shoulder width;
fd = adjustment factor for directional distribution of traffic
9
Max Service Flow Rate (pc/h/ln) 600 990 1430 1850 2100
Source: “Highway Capacity Manual (HCM) 2000” published by the Transportation Research
Board, National Research Council, Washington D.C., 2000.
High density but stable flow. Speed and Long traffic delays
D
freedom to manoeuvre are severely restricted.
J1
Figure 4.1: Total Existing Morning and Evening’s Peak Hours Traffic Volume and Each LOS for T-Junction J1 (Jln
Julau or Julau Feeder Road Intersects Road to Project Site) in Passenger Car Per Hour (PCPH) Passenger, Car
Unit Per Hour (PCUPH).
J2
Figure 4.2: Total Existing Morning and Evening’s Peak Hours Traffic Volume and Each LOS for T-Junction J2 (Jln
KJD Intersects Jln Julau or Julau Feeder Road) in Passenger Car Per Hour (PCPH) Passenger, Car Unit Per Hour
(PCUPH).
J3
Figure 4.3: Total Existing Morning and Evening’s Peak Hours Traffic Volume and Each LOS for T-Junction J3 (Jln
Julau or Julau Feeder Road Intersects Road to Julau Town Center) in Passenger Car Per Hour (PCPH)
Passenger, Car Unit Per Hour (PCUPH).
J1
Junctio Actual
n Service Service Flow Rate LOS
Flow Rate
(PC/H/LN) LOSA LOSB LOSC LOSD LOSE
C80 4000 4000 4000 4000 4000
0.52
(v/c) 0.15 0.248 0.358 0.462 5
fw 1 1 1 1 1
fd 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95
SF 600 990 1430 1850 2100
Peak hour
factor 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95
Existing
(2009)
AM Peak 63 A
PM Peak 64 A
Future
(2020)
AM Peak 140 A
PM Peak 142 A
Note:
J1 = T-Junction (Jalan Julau or Julau Feeder Road Intersects Jalan SMK Julau No.2).
J2
Junctio Actual
n Service Service Flow Rate LOS
Flow Rate
(PC/H/LN) LOSA LOSB LOSC LOSD LOSE
C80 4000 4000 4000 4000 4000
(v/c) 0.15 0.248 0.358 0.462 0.525
fw 1 1 1 1 1
fd 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95
SF 600 990 1430 1850 2100
Peak hour
factor 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95
Existing
(2009)
AM Peak 92 A
PM Peak 96 A
Future
(2020)
AM Peak 205 A
PM Peak 214 A
Note:
J2 = T-Junction (Jalan Julau or Julau Feeder Road Intersects Jalan KJD ).
J3
Junctio Actual
n Service Service Flow Rate LOS
Flow Rate
(PC/H/LN) LOSA LOSB LOSC LOSD LOSE
C80 4000 4000 4000 4000 4000
0.52
(v/c) 0.15 0.248 0.358 0.462 5
fw 1 1 1 1 1
fd 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95
SF 600 990 1430 1850 2100
Peak hour
factor 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95
Existing
(2009)
AM Peak 119 A
PM Peak 125 A
Future
(2020)
AM Peak 265 A
PM Peak 278 A
Note:
J3 = T-Junction (Jalan Pekan Julau Intersects Jalan Julau or Julau Feeder Road/Entabai).
It is apparent from Table 4.6 that traffic were operating at LOS “A”
during both the morning and evening peak hours at T-junction J1, J2,
and J3 and these traffic volumes may not able to achieve further
service of flow, LOS “B” after ten years of estimation. With the future
projected traffic, only intersection J3 would be operating at the worst
criteria among other traffic junctions with LOS “A” although applied 8%
of traffic forecasting growth rate until year 2010 during the morning and
evening peak hours traffic. The highest traffic capacity estimation will
only reach approximate 278 pcph by year 2020, and LOS “B” can only
occur by year 2030 on that particular traffic junction (J3).
Reserve
Capacity Expected Delay to Minor Street
LOS
Traffic
(PC/H)
> 400 A Little or no delay
300 – 399 B Short traffic delays
200 – 299 C Average traffic delays
100 – 199 D Long traffic delays
0 – 99 E Very long traffic delays
* F *
*When demand volume exceeds the capacity of the lane, extreme delays will be
encountered with queuing which may cause severe congestion affecting other
The capacity of the T-junction from the project site to KJD Road was
analysed based on the above criteria and the results are presented
in Table 4.8. KJD Road is considered as a major street and the
project assess road are considered as minor street. According to
Highway Capacity Manual 1985, Special Report 209 (Washington,
DC: Transportation Research Board), the flow relationship for two-
lane highways under an ideal condition and average speed of 90
km/h, the volume of vehicle shall be taken as approximately 750
pcph. Thus capacity of lane of 750 pcph shall be adopted for the
calculation of reserve capacity for the unsignalised junction for this
project.
Upon the completion and full utilisation of the project, it is anticipated
that traffic from the project site may not experiences any delay due
to average amount of traffic moving along Jalan KJD and Julau
Feeder Road during the peak hours.
Conclusion
This traffic study aimed to carry out future traffic projection and to
evaluate the impacts of future traffic on the access roads and T-
junctions/intersections that connecting from Proposed SMK Julau
No.2 to Julau - Sarikei/Sibu Junction and to Entabai/Julau Town
center located 4km away from project site. The assessment year is
Year 2020, which is ten (10) years after the assumed completion of
the proposed road in Year 2010. It is anticipated that the opening up
of the lands along the proposed secondary school (SMK Julau No.2)
would encourage future development and hence, Traffic for Year
significant impacts because the process will occur over a period of time, at the
convenience of the premises staffs and it’s occupants, following the issuance
of certificate of fitness by the authorities.
The worse case scenario could be the site be abrupt abandonment of project -
leaving neglected structures, construction debris and overgrown vegetation,
which will not only be aesthetically unpleasant but also poses potential
hazards to the unsuspecting (general) public.
The positive impacts associated with the successful implementation of the project
include:-
Assist in the spreading of inner town-traffic from the town centre to the outer
perimeter of the town limit by facilitating the decentralisation of urban
development, thus minimising future risks of massive traffic problem in the
town centre.