Professional Documents
Culture Documents
discussions, stats, and author profiles for this publication at: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/263390138
CITATIONS READS
2 55
4 AUTHORS, INCLUDING:
All in-text references underlined in blue are linked to publications on ResearchGate, Available from: Isam Janajreh
letting you access and read them immediately. Retrieved on: 09 April 2016
Proceedings of ASME 2011 5th International Conference on Energy Sustainability & 9th Fuel Cell Science,
Engineering and Technology Conference
ESFuelCell2011
August 7-10, 2011, Washington, DC, USA
ESFuelCell2011-54295
L2e L2
P( L, ) P(0, ) 2 2ua La 3 V c
V
h 3 e
2 h h 2 c (13)
Hence by adding these individual pressures the total
vapor pressure difference between the start of the
evaporator and the condenser end can be given as,
P P( L, ) P(0, )
L2e L2
V
3 e
2 2ua La 3 V c (14)
h 2 h h 2c
e. Wall material
The following graph shows the effect of wall material on FIGURE 9. Wall temperature against different wall
distribution of temperature. It is a well known fact [3] material
that we cannot choose the wall and liquid materials. Their
compatibility needs to be checked before using them. Figure 10 shows the axial distribution of vapor pressure
From the literature, [3] three most common wall for different heat flux along the length of heat pipe. It can
materials; Copper, Aluminum and Steel are chosen. It can be seen here that the variation of pressure is highest for
be seen from Fig. 9 that the wall temperature varies the maximum heat flux. This is expected, since to co-up
significantly with wall material. The values of
temperature are the highest for Steel and the lowest for
CONCLUSION