Professional Documents
Culture Documents
marketing logistics
..
[ ] ZARA H&M
[]ZARAH&M
()
ZARA Inditex
2000 ZARA Inditex 9
ZARA 57
70 ZARA Inditex
75
H&M Hennes&Mamitz ErlingPersson 1947
29
55
() ZARA HM
1)
ZARA H&M
ZARA
*ZARA
30
ZARA
ZARA
4-12
*ZARA
ZARA
ZARA
PDA PDA PDA
PDA
HM
*
T
*H&M 22
ICT(Information and Communicat ion Tech-nologies) H&M
2)
ZARA
25-35 H&M 15-30
ZARA
ZARA 22 5050
400 70
ZARA
ZARA H&M
700 ()
()
( 3-4 )
( 6 )
()
H&M ZARA
H&M ZARA 3050
ZARA
ZARA 18
HM 2001 ZARA 7H&M 13
3)
ZARA H&M
H&M
1980 H&M RoweHs
1998 H&M
2006
2007
H&M ZARA
ZARA 1975
ZARA 57
70 ZARA
ZARA
H&M
1 3 H&M
46 26
HM 1947 1964 28
1964 1967 H&M
H&M
4)
ZARA 0-0.3
3.5
ZARA
ZARA
ZARA
2000 ZARA 910 2003 ZARA
68.6 1096
ZARA
( 3 9
6 )ZARA
ZARA
ZARA
H&M ZAlLA
2004 2005 H&M
(Karl Lagerfeld) Paul MeCartney
(SteUa MeCartney) 2004 11
(KarI L, Lagerfeld) 24
2006 (VIKTOR)(ROLF)
2007 M byMadonna
()
ZARA
H&M
ppt() Lenna
presentation skills
presentation presentation
presentation
powerpoint presentation
1 60%
4
2. Introduction
3. Agenda
agenda
6 80%
4.
5.
6. Visual aid
office
office
7. transition
Office
powerpoint
visual aid
powerpoint
body language
presentation
presentation
presentation
presentation
ppt ! (
PPT
Shift Ctrl
Ctrl+shift+D
Powerpoint
Powerpoint
B
BW
word
1 Powerpoint
Microsoft Word
2 Microsoft word
word word
Powerpoint
word
3 word
word word
powerpoint
PPT PPS
PPT
powerpoint
Powerpoint 20 powerpoint
150
150
PPT
Microsoft
powerpoint
F5
powerpoint
PPT LOGO
powerpoint Logo
Logo
Logo
powerpoint
TrueType
powerpoint2003
alt+shift+s
PPT
powerpoint 5
1 2
powerpoint2003
Web
powerpoint
20
Powerpoint powerpoint
20
powerpoint
150
powerpoint2003
ESC
powerpoint
ctrl+]ctrl+[
powerpoint
Ctrl
123abc
powerpoint
Powerpoint
Powerpoint2003
powerpoint
excel
powerpoint
Powerpoint/2003
word2003
Powerpoint
word
powerpoint2003
powerpoint
powerpoint
PPT PPT PPS
powerpoint
PPT Powerpoint
Alt+TabAlt+Esc
Alt
DV
PPT
PPT
Alt D V
PPT
powerpoint
PPT Shift
Ctrl
Ctrl
PPT
PPT
*.prn
PPT
PPT
100KB PPT
PPT
100KB50000KB
PPT
Ctrl
PPT
Web
JPEG
PPT
Powerpoint
PPT
Shift
shift
shift
PPT2007
http://group.xiaonei.com/GetThread.do?id=312500509&curpage=0&
parentpage=0&tribeId=76611
Shift Ctrl
Ctrl+shift+D
Powerpoint
Powerpoint
BW
word
1 Powerpoint
Microsoft Word
2 Microsoft word
word word
Powerpoint
word
3 word
word word
powerpoint
PPT PPS
PPT
powerpoint
Powerpoint 20 powerpoint
150
150
PPT
Microsoft
powerpoint
F5
powerpoint
PPT LOGO
powerpoint Logo
Logo
Logo
powerpoint
TrueType
powerpoint2003
alt+shift+s
PPT
powerpoint 5
1 2
powerpoint2003
Web
powerpoint
20
Powerpoint powerpoint
20
powerpoint
150
powerpoint2003
ESC
powerpoint
ctrl+]ctrl+[
powerpoint
Ctrl
123abc
powerpoint
Powerpoint
Powerpoint2003
powerpoint
excel
powerpoint
Powerpoint/2003
word2003
Powerpoint
word
powerpoint2003
powerpoint
powerpoint
powerpoint
PPT Powerpoint
Alt+Tab Alt+Esc
Alt
DV
PPT
PPT
Alt D V
PPT
powerpoint
PPT Shift
Ctrl
Ctrl
PPT
PPT
*.prn
PPT
PPT
100KB PPT
PPT
100KB50000KB
PPT
Ctrl
PPT
Web
JPEG
PPT
Powerpoint
PPT
Shift
shift
shift
PPT2007
Allen
"" 2001 6 16-17
MITYale
80
20 70
20 80
20 0
20 50
1998
20 50 MM
20
70
20 50
30 ""
1 RBC
20 70 RBC
Real Business Cycle
20 70 1978
RBC
20 70
RBC
RBC
1988 Lucass
lucas
Benhabib1994 Lucas
3
20 50
U
1990
Gmenwood Jovanovic JPE
500
10
500 500
500
1992 JPE
800
Lucas 1992 Econondc Journal 1978 Econometrica
cash in advance
20 7080
20 90 1995
MBA
20 80
RobeLucas 1988
1988 1994
1994 Lucas
52
MBA
"C""Internationally Compatible"
"InterneqCOmparabfe""Internationally Competitive"
--
56
Journal Of Finane
JOUrnal of Finance Journal Of Financial Economics
Review of Financial Studies Review Of Financial Studies
Journal of Financial Economics
Review of Finacial Studies
Journal Of Finance
~ Jordin
13
CFO CEO UFO,UFO ugly fat oldjesus~
0
~
~
100
100
Cash
1+1=?
a.2
b.3
c.CFO
3.,;,,
.
4.,: ,.
5.,?,,,,
.
6.,,.
..
ps:..
7.,,,
!
8.,?! ,
,. ,,,
.
9.,,900RMB,,;,800RMB,,
;,700RMB,, 600 .,300RMB,
!!? 600, 300 ?
,,TMD! 300 !
10., 5 , 20
.?,
,!
11.,?.,,;
,;,;
,.
12.,.,
~!?
13.,-,,.~
,! Shanghai University of XXX. :
~
14.,.
(),
!
15.:? :20 .
:!(,)!
15-40 ,, 8 .
,,,,: : ~
100 ! : ,! : ,,!
2010-05-06 10:20 | (:)
A H Q
/
ADL R
I
B RATER
IT RFM
J GREP
ROS/RMS
SWOT
3C
SERVQUAL
SIPOC
BCG SCOR
C
SFO
/ SLEPT
SWOT-CLPV
/
STEEPLE
CSP SCP
K
SWOT T
KJ
D KT
V
L V
VRIO
W
E
X
F M
7S
7S
FRICT
5Cs
G
N
GE Z
SWOT
NMN
P
PEST
PAEI -
PIMS
PESTEL ZETA
CE11
Q
H 3E
QFD
6 15
http://blog.xiaonei.com/GetEntry.do?id=302776830&owner=24674873
56
CAPMAPT
3.8
15
46 6
8 4
SAS
CAPM
BS
workshop
50 9 12 12
CFA
24
48
798
Bless all~~~
6
1
1968 50,000
...
5,000 50,000
14 1
21965 IPO
IPO
56
14 3
14 5
7
1869 Marcus Goldman
40
60 1929
97 IPO
100
101
103
140 700
----
PE
GPLP
20%
1
PE
25% 20% 15%
15% 15% 10%
2,
VC
1980 80
90
90
4
A
B.
C.
D.
A.
B. 1
2
3
C.
D.
E. 26
PE
hard to define
passion
a. Common sense.
common sense
b. Critical thinking.
c. Passion to life.
PE
d.
open drive
e.
analyst
structural thinking
present
IBM
follow your
heart
Distressed Securities
Distressed Securities
2008-7-8 11:28:00 : : : :
Distressed Securities
Distressed Securities
20-30 Distressed
Securities Distressed Securities
Distressed Securities
07-08
Distressed Securities
Distressed securities
30
Distressed Securities
Distressed securities
Distressed Securities
Distressed Securities
Distressed Securities
Distressed
Securities
Distressed Securities
2Distressed Securities
Distressed Securities
Distressed Securities Distressed Securities
Distressed Securities
Distressed
Securities Distressed Securities
1?
Distressed Securities
1 Distressed Securities
Distressed Securities
Distressed Securities
3-6
TASS 4000
500 0.5
Morningstar 500 0.96
Distressed Securities
Distressed Securities
Distressed Securities
Distressed Securities
3/ 4
1 200
10%
180
31 200
570
Distressed Securities
DistressedSecurities
3.5%
Distressed Securities
Distressed Securities
Distressed Securities
600386
2005
05
05
05
topcj.com
3 Distressed Securities
Distressed Securities
Distressed Securities
Distressed Securities
515355
3 4 8
07-08
5- 8 Distressed Securities
:51 100 20
53 100 60
20 DistressedSecurities
Distressed Securities
ST Distressed Securities
Distressed Securities ST
Distressed Securities
Distressed Securities Distressed
Securities Distressed Securities
[] Financial Modeling
Financial Modeling
***Thanks***
banker
investment banker
financial modeling
56
DCF
1.
2.
3.
4. /
5. abcd
Excel
present
DCF
1.
2.
/
/ sense
DCF
2.
3.
fit in
WACC
DCF DCF
1. DCF FCF
2. DCF
3. DCF
4. DCF
5. WACC ...
DCF comps
output
manipulate comps
banker
experienced banker
post
[] 10 Angelo
Excel
http://excelpro.blog.sohu.com/106769025.html
10
/ ExcelPro
SPSS PPTexcel
SASSPSS Clementine
ExcelPro
3PPT word
PPT
PPT PPT PS flash
office office
IdeaPPT
PPT *
Toastmasters
storytelling
ExcelPro ExcelPro
21 11
21
11 A H
(CICC)
11 4
11
11
8 16
20
A
11 A
IT
8-10
10
This is an important question for prospective applicants (in particular, undergrad/MBA students) looking for
summer internships and fulltime jobs alike.
The decision was easier for me than for most people. The cons of investment banking the long hours, the
repetitive and unengaging nature of the work, the lack of non-finance exit opportunities
mattered far more to me than a 6-figure salary. I seriously considered sales & trading (in fact, I spent a summer
at Credit Suisse First Boston in NY), and was tempted to continue in that line of work post-graduation.
Instead of defining the basic characteristics of each job (there are plenty of resources out there for that,
including the Vault andWetfeet Guides), I will address a laundry list of defining differences between the
two professions.
Let me caveat by saying THESE ARE NOT YOUR ONLY OPTIONS. People get carried away into thinking thats all
there is.
#1 SALARY
This is the biggest superficial difference. Thats not to imply that salary doesnt matter. Banking salaries
average 50-100% higherthan consulting salaries, with the difference increasingly significant as your seniority
increases. Consulting compensates with perks that banking does not offer from better travel allowances
to more generous health and retirement packages.
I know investment bankers make more money. But from a cashflow perspective, its exactly the same!
This simply means that consultants and bankers make comparable base salaries, and at the end of the year,
bankers are awarded a bonus which can comprise more than 50% of their total annual compensation. Cashflow
or not, the extra money is substantial and a defining driver of why many people do investment
banking. This is also a difficult issue for consulting firms with respect to employee retention. In my time at
McKinsey, easily half the people who left the firm went into the financial world (from hedge funds to PE), and
salary was undoubtedly a major factor in the decision.
My advice is this if after considering all 5 factors Ive listed here, you still think the pay difference (for 1st yr
analysts, averaging between $30-60K/year) would mean a substantial difference in your personal and
professional job satisfaction,choose banking.
-Hours. Bankers work brutal hours, no surprise. They can average 14-16 hours/day but it can get FAR
WORSE.
My roommates in New York (both investment bankers at Goldman Sachs) would sometimes go several weeks
before wed even exchange a word. Which meant not only were they getting in after I went to sleep (around
2am), but going back to the office before I woke up (around 7am).
Your second year as an investment banker gets better in the 10-14 hours/day range but also with
unpredictably tough periods.
Consultants average 12 hours/day, with the typical variations depending on client, team goals, etc
-Travel. Bankers do some for roadshows, due diligence, etc but spend 90% of their time in one office until
youre partner-level (this is investment banking; you can expect more travel in private equity and investment
management). Consultants depending on firm travel anywhere from 25-75% of their time. At the Big 3 (Bain,
Boston Consulting Group, McKinsey), you can expect travel 50-75% of the time. Ive heard of boutiques
-Relationship with coworkers, managers, and firm. This is less discussed but equally important.
Consulting firms have a verycollegial atmosphere, where the focus is on getting the work done but
also ensuring your professional success. This attitude permeates all interactions. Managers rarely yell,
coworkers try to help each other out whenever possible, and companies are organized to provide consultants
support with training, expertise, etc. Finally, networking is important at consulting firms, and social events are
focused on helping consultants build contacts and relationships throughout the firm.
Investment banks, on the other hand, have a more competitive, hierarchical setup. You can expect more tense
relationships with your bosses, youll probably be yelled at from time to time for mistakes, and coworkers are
much less willing to help each other out (theyve got enough on their plates, and your success means theres
more competition for the biggest bonuses). In addition, youll have limited exposure across the company to
other groups, departments, etc less ability to network across the company.
#3 SKILL DEVELOPMENT
Call me biased, but I received the best years of business training possible in my time at McKinsey.
Thorough and at times intense exposure to textbook business principles and practices. In addition, the project
team model leads to mentorship opportunities with managers, partners, and coworkers. Finally, you have
constant client interaction which develops client skills from managing client teams to running meetings to
learning how to navigate different corporate environments.
That being said, heres a quick list of what you can expect to learn in both fields:
By hard skills, I mostly mean software (ie Microsoft Office Suite), analytics (ie financial valuation). By soft
skills, I mean the interpersonal, qualitative interactions that you have with coworkers, the broader firm, clients,
etc
CONSULTING
Hard skills:
1) Microsoft Powerpoint you will (and have to) become a master at this, and will eventually have the ability to
produce presentations quickly, concisely, and meaningfully
2) Microsoft Excel less exposure than investment banking. Still, modeling is a meaningful component of a
consultants work, and something every consultant is expected to have significant exposure to. Note
-firmsodeling done in case work may not be directly comparable to the financial modeling more common at
investment banks
3) Business knowledge typically broad exposure across different topics like strategy, operations, organization
and several areas where youll have expertise. This expertise may be as broad as operations turnaround and
as specific as benchmarking for insurance companies.
Soft skills:
1) Client interaction (explained above)
2) Heavy team interaction
3) Presentation skills this is a cornerstone of consulting work. After all, findings dont mean anything if you
cant convince the client to believe in and adopt them
4) Project/workflow planning and execution this is subtle but important. Much of the time at investment banks,
you are given incremental work eg, add these updated numbers to the model, bind these presentations, insert
a graph on chart 11. Consulting is focused on you OWNING a piece of the entire project, setting your own
deliverables and timeline, and executing against that framework. This helps you develop the ability to be
standalone in consulting lingo.
INVESTMENT BANKING
Hard skills:
1) Microsoft Excel clearly you will become a master at this, and is a mandatory for success. Youll know the
ins-and-outs, every keyboard shortcut known to man (and then some), and so forth
2) Microsoft Powerpoint much less exposure here depending on the focus of your work (for instance, more in
Corporate Finance, less in Mergers & Acquisitions). Very little experience in building a presentation from scratch.
3) Financial valuation self-explanatory. Differs based on group/focus, but at the very least youll understand
financial statements inside and out, and have strong knowledge of how companies are financed
Soft skills:
1) Work endurance this is the upside to those 100+ hour weeks, which is the ability to work incredibly long and
incredibly hard. Basically, every job you take post investment banking will feel somewhat like a vacation. Its a
great trait to have
2) Seeing deals get done investment bankers have, at times, better access to the leading business leaders of
the day. As a junior banker, you may not have direct interaction but will be exposed through countless meetings,
conference calls, etc to these people and see how deals are done and groundbreaking changes in business
emerge day-to-day.
The last 2 points in this post are shorter, because I plan to write separate entries on each of them in the future
#4 NETWORKING
Less discussed but important. Consultants move on to a vast array of fields from industry to academia,
government to non-profit. Investment bankers do so less most continue within the financial world. Your
professional network and future career opportunities will be heavily influenced by your colleagues and
your firm alumni.
In addition my perspective is that consulting firms (similar to point #2) facilitate more interactions between
alumni and current employees as well as future networking between alumni than investment banks. However,
bulge-bracket investment banks have a much larger alumni base, and it certainly isnt impossible for you to build
strong connections provided you are proactive and innovative enough.
#5 EXIT OPPORTUNITIES
Corollary to point #4, this is influenced by your firms alumni and also the following:
When it comes down to it, the conclusion is similar: if you want maximum career flexibility, consulting provides
that in spades. If you want maximum career flexibility WITHIN finance (and corporate financial roles),
investment banking provides that.
http://managementconsulted.com/consulting-jobs/question-of-the-day-management-consulting-versus-investment-banking/
19992004
2004 4
()
2009
2008
8 24 8
IMF
2006
2004 12
1995
20
kevin
(Merger)(Acquisition)
50%
19
20 20
85%
40 50
60
20 80
1980-1988 20000 1985
20 90
(FDI)
1987 745 1990
1510 2000 11438 2001
(Synergy)
(Operating Synergy)(Financial Synergy)
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
1.
2.(
)
3.
4.
1.
2. 1937
3.
4.?
Q Q=/
Q<1
5.?
(1976)
;
;
6.
;
,,;
7.
50%
;
;
?
;
10%
; BOT
9 12
13
20
()
(
311 1993 )
()()
(
197 2005 )
18
18 (404
1998 )
()
()
536 ??
!
?
20
?!
?
!
3 3
()
20
1985
20
2000
!
2000 1992
14
Windows
BD-Win
1993
1994
3
2000
()
???
1980
3 15
1980 20
A 302
A 302
38
500
2008 1 1
16
(2007 11 26 ?12 25 )
300
11 26 300
80
11 26 , 80
EPR 1600 (MW)
160
11 26 , 150
10 A330-200
11 27
4
4
7.5
??
7.5
11 28
11 28
497
; 470
200
28 200
3
70%
IPO
11 29
?? 40 20
600 140 300 36
18.1
11 30 () 18.1 ( 198.62
)/(Fortis)4.18%
11 30
12 3 , 95% 55
20%
DHL
12 4 2
2 16 100
80
12 5 , 500 80
45 50 50 40
12 5 ??
150
12 9 ()
() 98.55 45.66
20
12 10 ,
675 180
20
12 12
190
12 12 , 200
190
100
12 12 160
12 12 ,??
12 13 , 5
12 13
12 14
153 152
12 16 , ??
12 17 ??
3
12 18 , 30
12 18 50%
60 460
80
12 18 , 80
12 19 ,??
12 19 ,??
50
12 20 ,
50
9.9%
QDII
12 21
QDII() H
12 21 ARJ21-700
12 21 ??? 800
(2007 11 26 ?12 25 )
73%
11 23 (ArcelorMittal)
11 8 28.03% 73%
11 25
??Nakheel 520
11 26 , 2008 2012
2012 2500
( 2.69 )
5%
11 26 , 75
4.9%
11 26 ??
11 28 , solarig
1000 25
11 29 ,
114
11 30 ,
78
REBOX
11 30
(EIB) 5
10
24
12 3
(Pilbara) 24.2
12 3 ,
2008
12 4 , ??(GIC) 2008
12 7 ,(CSGN.VX: ),
,
12 10 (UBS)
(GIC) 130 ( 115 )
12 11
12 11
Essar 6
16
3 5
12 12
12 13 55
45
12 13
12 13
2008-2009
12 13 27
12 13 ,
110
12 14
12 14 () 11 244
12.16
12 14 ?-
7
12 15 ,
118
12 18 ,()
12 18
12 18 () 34
12 19 101
12 19 , 2008 ????
12 20 , 3
2009
12 21 3.9
51%
12 23
10
http://blog.sina.com.cn/kevinli99
~
1
XXXXX
5
6
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24 1
25
26 3 1
27
WI
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
1
1
2
1
2
3
1
2
3
2
2
3
1
2
3
4
5
4
1 1
1
2
3
5
1
2
3
4
5
6
6
7
1
2
3
8
1
2
3
4
9
1
2
3
10
1
2
3
11
1
2
3
12
1
2
3
4
5
13
1
2
14 1
10
14
,
1
2
3
15
1
2
16
1 2
3
456
17
1 2 3
18
1
2
3
19
1 2 3
4
2
3
4
5
61981
71985
81986
91988 4
101990 12 1991 6
111994
122001 10
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35 1
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46 A B H N S
47
48
49
50
51 1 15 5
52
53
54
55
56
571877
58
59 20 80
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77LIBOR
781996 1 3
79 2002 6 1
80
81
822003 6 30
83
84 2003 4 2003 9
5000
85
86
87
88
892003 4
90 1961
91
927 14
93
94
95
96
97
98
99
100 5
101
102
103
104
105
106 100 100
107
108
109
110
111
7
8
2
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
http://www.renren.com/profile.do?id=332067868
---
---
1
2 outlook
3.. **
4.
5
6* !
7 RE RE
8
1
ALL
x
x
x
Dear xxx
2 Email
HI
Best Regards
1. Email
2. Email
3. Email 1234
1234
4.
5.
Email
; Email
6.
7.
8. :)
Business Email :)
:)
1.
2.
3.
4. 4
5.
6. 2MB
1.
2.
3.
4.
Verdana Arial 10
1.
4
2.
OUTLOOK
3.
1. Email
,
2
24
2.
3. 10
10
4.
3
RE
replay all
RE RE
6.
To CC BCC
1 To
2 CC CC CC
Email
3 BCC BCC
4TOCC
!
RE
1
http://www.microbell.com/index.asp
2
http://www.p5w.net/
21
21
http://www.cs.com.cn/
http://www.cnstock.com/
21
http://www.eeo.com.cn/
21 http://www.21cbh.com/
10
http://www.sse.com.cn/sseportal/ps/zhs/home.html
8
http://disclosure.szse.cn/m/drgg.htm
-CBS News
(AP) BERLIN (AP) - The U.S. professional services firm Deloitte LLP's consultancy
division is in talks to take over its competitor Roland Berger Strategy Consultants,
a company executive said Wednesday.
A spokesman for Roland Berger, Matthias Hopfmueller, confirmed that talks with
Deloitte are under way, but declined to elaborate.
The German consultancy, based in Munich, employs about 2,000 people and
generated a revenue of 616 million in 2009, it says. Deloitte's different business
consulting lines' revenue totals $7.5 billion, Plendl said.
The merged company will bring together Deloitte's strategy, operations and
company restructuring consultancy divisions with its German competitor and will
be called Roland Berger Deloitte Strategy Consulting, Plendl said.
The new company will enjoy an "excellent market position" and aims to become a
leading player in the field, Plendl said - a clear message of attack to McKinsey Co.'s
that now dominates the market.
20
24 200
Rui ChengGang
31
500
19
the test of a first rate of
intelligence is to have two opposed ideas at the same time and still retain the
ability to function()
10
10
10
10
boring
CEO
360
:- 2010 11 11 04:12
PEPrivate Equity
PE
PE
2007 IT
2007
30 CEO
45 2007 40 50
2007 33.6 17.3
2007
100 11
19 60 21 77
14.6 41.6
PE
PE
CEO
PE
2005
35%
10
PE
eBay
PE
PE
100
PE 15 38 PE
PE
PE
2007
11 9 5.78% PE
PE
2005
35%
10
PE
eBay
PE
PE
100
PE 15 38 PE
PE
PE
2007
11 9 5.78% PE
CEO
2009 1
Hi-lary Schneider 3
CEO
Au-todesk CEO
Autodesk 1992 2.85 2005 15.23
CEO CEO
2010 Facebook
24
PE
CEO
B2BB2C C2CB2M
(B2C )(B2B ) (
)()()
B2C
B2C
2004
54 B2C 2004 45
C2C
eBay PayPal
C2C PayPal
PayPal
C2C
2004 B2B
135 iResearch 2007 200
2004 B2B
98 3160 2003 1282 iResearch
2007 17000 B2B
16900
C2C
: 3 C2C
2007
2007 7827
3
2007 7 26
07
2006 5
xxx
6 1 6 12
2007 12 26
B2C
B2C
B2C
B2C
21
5 9
C ()
C2C
eBay B2C
()
A D D
500 ()
C2C
C2C B2C C B
C
2008 C2C
C E O
CN N IC 323
B2C
()
C
C2C B2C
B2C C2C
B2C
B 2C
B2C
4
B 2C
PK
66
salesperson
IBD
Syndicated
LoanM&A
industrial
pitch
equity
pitch
50-100
target
pitch
Pitch
M&A
IPO
trader 4 trader
1
2
10%
10% 50%
150
5%Legal reserve 10%
5% 10%.
10%
10%
10%
1966 7 24 66-537
345
1/20
1/10
117
Reserve for own shares Reserves
provided for by the articles of associationCapital and
reservesOther reserves
Appropriated rerained
earningsUnappropriated retained earnings
Delaware
General Corporation Law 171
The statement of
retained earnings
1. 5%
10% 10% 50%
2.
3. 5%-10%
gunner
2010 10 20
0.25 2.25% 2.50%
0.25 5.31% 5.56%
1
20-60bp
20-25bp
9 5 0 5
10
2005
9
06-07
()
07-08
5 60bp
GDP
9.5%
10 CPI 4%
CPI
CPI 3%
4
CPI
CPI
1-2 1 3% CPI
3% 4% CPI
3%
1 3%
1 3%
1 6.06% 06 8
( 6.12% 2bp)
06 07
6%
8%
10
6 1
2004 2007
1
( 07
06 CPI
1
1 1
12-15bp
1
5 3.6%
5 4.2%
5 60bp 4.2%
4%
4%
6 1 25-30bp
1
1 10-15bp
1 2.25% 1
25bp 07
(07 9
) 1
25-30bp 2.35-2.4% 1
3 30-35bp3
1.8-1.9% 30bp
3 1.91%
3 3
30bp 3 20-25bp 3
52bp 3 3
3 1 50bp 1
2.35-2.4% 3 2.85-2.9% 10
3.6-3.7%
20bp
30-40bp 07 10
40bp 3.18% 3.58%10
3.6-3.7%
7
Shibor
20bp
3 Shibor Shibor
Repo Shibor Repo 30bp
50bp
3 Shibor
5
19 4 15
7 Andrew Carnegie
Joseph Frazier
Wall
The
Third Chimpanzee by Jared Diamond 2004 ;
15
The Warren Buffett Portfolio:
Mastering
the Power of the Focus Investment Strategy
GRobert
G.Hagstrom
18 Three Scientists
and Their GodsLooking For Meaning in An Age of Information
Robert Wright
19 Only the Paranoid Survive
Andy
Grove 1997
29
56
1
LatticeworkThe New Investing
.G.Robert G. Hagstrom
InvestingThe Last Liberal Art
3
: The CrowdA Study of the Popular Mind
.Gustave Le Bon
9
The Five Rules for Successful Stock Investing
.
Pat Dorsey
10
16.
17 Hot Commodities
.Jim Rogers
18 Davis Dynasty
.John Rothchild
29 Fooled by Randomness
..Nassim
Nicholas Taleb
1.
?
2.:
3.:21
1992
4
:?
2007
60
59
1 2010 1
22010 1
32010 2010 6
4 2010 1
5 2010 7
46
CEO
12
200 100
1000
11 2
3
1986
1993
1998 4
TPG
CEO
CEO
2005 PE
PE
PE PE
John Thorton
Fortress Capital Kevin Czinger 2
PE
2008 10 Rhone
Capital
100
2009
1999
9
60% 3.5
11 5
PE
2004
100 50%
PE
CEO
11 11
PE
DNA
UBS
quant quant
boss
HR
7 interview. associate vice president executive
director.
PhD GG
PhD GG
GG GG
interviewer
interviewer PhD+
VaRConditional VaR,
quantile
arctan(1/x)
tanx
Master Master
45
betawhich securities
interview A
quantitative easing,
enterpreneourship
5
follow
market.
program
listing
defending myself
99.95%quantile impressive
impressive?
impressive
interviewer 15
Morgan Stanley
6 B
finance
crazy
a)
b) time-variant
which,
C++ code
memory efficient
for
code
5 bullshit
for loop .
interviewer GG
GG
GG
GG
GG
Morgan Stanley
4 50
2010 11 30 14:59
11 30 KKR TPG
Capital 11 10
11 29 5
11 26
34.3
8 43.35
43.35 34.3
7.657.35 7.35
600171.SH600621.SH11 29
6.8
2007
http://www.eeo.com.cn/Politics/beijing_news/2010/12/02/187896.shtml
21
40
2005
40
50 10
ipod
100 90
90 10
2002
20
10
2003 2004
2005 2006 2006
2007
2008 10 6100 1600 612009
2010 !
1923
Know moredo better
2008
2008
2010-11-14
()
()
()
()
()
()
()
1.
2.
1.
2.
3.
95
60
2008
2008
()
70
()
CPI
2007
CPI PPI
M1 M2 M1 -M2 M2/GDP
()
M2
2009 15%
2010 18.3%
2%
2001 WTO
2009
GDP 24% 651002009 1.2
2008
15-20%
PMI
2000
03-07
08-09
2004
170-220 90-130 35-40
1.6-2 50%
2009 7 90 100
GDP 2009 34.5 37.5 GPD
M2 09 M2 47.5 60.6
13.1 09 4.4 M2 34%09
3.62 27.6%
M2
10--20%
60% 09
09
23%09
10 22%
CDO CDS 08
40%
()
1.
2.
2% 0.2%--0.3%
3.
M2 CPI
M2/GDP 91 88.8% 00 135.7%08 151.3%09 178%
185% 60% M2 ,
15% 08 1 2008 1
M2 41.7 2009 1 49.6 18.94% 7154
8123 10.36%2009 M2 62.56
26.13% 2.29% 10 11.86%
3.29% M2 69.98 58.3
11.69 GDP 37.5 99
M2 M2 69%
16% M2
1978 1992 M1
M2 20 1.25
1.41 CPI
M2 19781999
4.
08-09
M2
30%
2.5%
5.
1-10 09
2008 6%
2.5% 6%---16%
9% 9%
2011 2012
2013 2004-08
M2 50%09-10 28%
M2 71 15% 83 96
2012 GDP 8% 44 M2/GDP 218%
6 6.5 7
--- 95
27%
()
1968
2008
()
()
()
1.
M1 M2 M1 M2
M1 11 3300 M1
34%, 2300
1996 M1 10%
20% 1996 09 11 95
M1M2
2.PE\PB
PE\PB
2001 PE 70 2007
10 6200 PE 69 50.6 A
PE 22 30 PE
36 55 74 PB 4 3
00
16 14 500
15 20-25 25-30
A
3.
, PE
PE PE
4%
PE 25 2% PE
70 3%--4%
1997-2008 11 3%
4% 4%
4% PE 10 19
2%
PE 25
30 PE 14
4.
10 26
31 19.4 5200 /2.7%
1.68% 5% 2007
10 28 8.91 1951
2.18%
0.697%
A
5000 3500 6000-7000 4000
8000
10 26 20.8 900 0.4%
16
:
1.
2.
07 8 31 100
20 36 41
3.
04~05
4.
bystander
Bystander
99%1%
07
20
07
5 08
08 7 100%
20%
08
Intel,
2.
-----
360 QQ
QQ QQ QQ QQ QQ ,
ROE
40~50%
;
;
;
98
98
98
98
98 30% 02~03
98
30%
10 5
20
07 8 40 3000
07 7
1.
10
10% 3
PE 10 13 1.1*1.1*1.1*1.3 70%
PE
PE 01
400~500%
PE
PE Google PE
24 2000 ,PE 11
Hi .
05
08 10
32000 PE 25
20000 18000 10600 PE 6.3
70 40 35 40 PE
23 20
10 10 6 PE,
400 102 ;
; 41 1186
40
4
10 10 60
2008 200 3 22
07
2.
XX 99
99 20
20
3.
ARPU
4
A
;
;
;
IPO
5
6
7
5%
1%
5% 1%
;
;
;
;
http://www.chinanews.com.cn/stock/2010/11-19/2668144.shtml
Stanley MorganStanley stanley
Characteristic MorganStanley
Aggresive MorganStanley
MA MorganStanley File
AC Applicant
MorganStanley
9
MorganStanley IBD
2010 10 10 200
2500
Deadline MorganStanley HR
Email 200
MorganStanley
43 SHL Numerical
Verbal Computer KPMGPwC
SHL
2010 10 31
Offer
11 MorganStanley 11
+19 FA LUN GONG TUI DAND,
HR
MorganStanley 10 10
+852
Why MorganStanley?
Why IBD?
Why do you think you are suitable for this position
Example of leadership and teamwork?
IPO
GOOGLE
MorganStanley MA
IPHONE 1 .......
MA
2010 11 7
JWMarriot 399
AC
MorganStanley852 AC AC JW Marriot
10 MA Smart Nice
Section 1 HR
2 3
HR MAHR
HR
HR
OKlet us turn to another question.
HR
MorganStanely FT
MorganStanely
IPO
MorganStanely
Section 4 KP 2 Case
IPO MorganStanely IPO 10
4 6 NB
2 Presentation
Teamleader MorganStanely Applicant
8 2
MorganStanely JW 1000M
Starbucks +
OL Starbucks
WallStreetJournal TIMES
PAR
2010 11 21 200
Riz-Clarton ifc
FrontDesk Appointment
PAR Team PAR
MorganStanley
Morgan MorganStanley
CICC
PAR PAR
PAR PAR
PAR MorganStanley
PAR 30 MorganStanley
PAR
IBD 4
5 buy and
sell side M&AIPO
CFO 5
MorganStanely 30W
IPO
Teamleader
JP Morgan GoldmanSachs MerrillLynch
MA40
MorganStanely
TIPS
2 SB
CFA CPA
4 TX TX
PAR FerragamoZegna
Dunhill
Zegna
Ferragamo
MA MA NICE
Stanley
MorganStanley NO.2.19 50% AL30%
20%
PAR PAR
Riz-Carlton
http://finance.ifeng.com/ipo/xgpl/20101206/3007062.shtml
PE
==================================================
10 par
30%
300-500 sr asso
9K3 top pay top pay
7K BBS OT
cha2 OT
OT
professional services provider
sr
BBS
===================================================
IT
15W-20W 30%-50%
PPT PPT
energy talktive
MBA candidates
professional services
====================================================
PE
5 15
100%
=======================
==============================
PE associate
4-5
=====================
================================
Investment Bank
bulge bracket, , ,
, , , , ,
boutique
IBD
0.5% 5%
9 8-9 5-6
Sales&Trading
S&T focus
HK
7 7-8 8 6
7 6 45
Research
S&T
S&T
Private Banking
HK
UBS
UBS A
UBSS DB A
GPA
CFA level1
IBD social leadership
S&T research
private banking
X
S&T
A IPO IBD
pay 5K-2W
1W
IPO S&T
PE
=============================
============================
PE fund
PE
PE
PE 2-4 PE
PE
PE
PE
PE MD LP
associate associate
market DD(due diligence,) financial DD(
advisory , legal DD tech consulting firm
technial DD
DD
PE
PE
PE
PE 2-4 2-4
PE
PE 2
10 PE
PE
PE
pre-IPO
PE X pre-IPO
PE IPO IPO
PE
PE
fund PE
PE FOF(
PE
PE VC
PE VC PE
VCPE
VC VC
PE pay PE
PE pay PE PE
KKR CDH pay entry level RMB100W
base life style
banking
top consulting
associate->senior associate->VP->MD
hedge fund HF
hedge fund hedge
hedge fund HK
PE VC
PE PE
hedge fund HF
========================
=============================
PE
http://www.eeo.com.cn/wangshang/fmgs/2010/12/01/187576.shtml
ZZ PE
2010 12 21 09:14
PE
100 PE
PE
PE
7~8 20
100
PE
PE
PE
Pre-IPO()
10
PE
PE
12 3
()
PE
2008 2009 12 / 12.6 / 20
PE
PE 20062007
11 23 ()
2001
PE
(11.45,0.00,0.00%)
2007
40 (
)
PE
()
6000 2006 6
PE PE
15 18
PE
50
PE
PE
PE
VC PE 4.2%
()
2008 40 13 2010
30 10
Pre-IPO
PE
(12.45,-0.27,-2.12%)
8 13
2008 8
Pre-IPO
PE/VC
PE PE
PE
PE
PE
PE
2000
2000
2007
2008
2010~2011
(
)
LP
10 PE 138
50 45
32.6% 3 87 63.0%
7 16 11.6% 9
7 5.1%
PE
(PE)
PE
PE
PE PE
PE PE
() PE
PE PE
PE
PE PE
PE
PE PE
PE
PE
PE
PE
PE
ZZ
2010 12 21 23:30 21 [ ]
A 12 20
48
11 A H
(CICC)
11
48 3 A 21
11 7 1 2
(13.09,-0.30,-2.24%)
2010
A 10
(20.56,-0.34,-1.63%)
66 120 A (
) 87 350
...
Shell
2008 9
2 Chasing Daylight
4 Swimming Across
2 1 7
About Me
Victor LIU 05
2009 6 Students In Free Enterprise,
SIFEMcKinsey & Company
The Boston Consulting GroupMonitor Group
Roland Berger Strategy Consultants Bain & Company
Analysys Consulting International Universum
CommunicationsChina Export and Credit Insurance Corporation,
Sinosure
F1Snooker
OK
Victor LIU
track record
10
40
2 3
4
4 PhD
3
40 3
strategystructuremarketprofit
pricing process
layout
branding marketing
paranoid maverick
Chasing Daylight
Tow
2006 3
4 4567
GPA
PhD
BBS internjob
E-Strat
4
T-Shirt
4
6 3
10 2
Morgan Stanley1 Goldman Sachs2 BCG
McKinsey
2006 5
2006 5 Morgan StanleyJING
Forum SICA
skill set
entry level consultant skills
9 JING Forum
10 CCTV
10 SIFE 27
SIFE
4 Resume
BCG
research
BBS 4
cover letter stable
offer cancel
promote
7 2
10
Universum
4 focus group
2
case interview
case interview
case interview
5
If not better than others, you are at least as
good as them.
Monitor
BCG
2007 5 21
IT
Analysys
Sinosure offer
Q 2
Swimming Across
If you are not careful, it can chew you up and spit you out. But if you work hard, you can
really hit it big, and I mean, REALLY BIG.
Donald
Trump
The Apprentice
7 Sinosure 3
3 8
Intel
40
718
Tow
SIFE SIFE
9 BCG 1 Bain
intern Bain
BCG 80
40
cold call excel
10
Analysys
10 BCG PTA pool
2007 9 25
Goldman Sachs
Niagara Falls New York Hilton Trump Tower
Goldman Sachs executive presentation
3
Pardon Monitor research
Monitor PTA
Monitor 7 case
McKinseyBCGMonitorRB
McKinsey Summer BA
McKinsey
48
offer Summer BA
McKinsey PEIpersonal
experience interview case marketing sizing
case
F1 case 10
12 Dominos pizza
communication skills candidate
case structured
BCG PTA
pre-talk case
case style
case case
insider information rank
below average
McKinsey
McKinsey
part-time
Supervisor nice
5
3
50/50 supervisor
supervisor
skill set
RB
case
offer
05
/ / /
3 Shell
Gourami Business Challenge Shell
4 1 Anything else?
points 2
Would be a shame as a consultant if I do not
pass this time.8
Gourami Business Challenge
case interview
Monitor
lifestylecase interview
26 A Z 1 26
(KNOWLEDGE) 11+14+15+23+12+5+4+7+5=96
(HARDWORK) 8+1+18+4+23+15+18+11=98
(ATTITUDE) 1+20+20+9+20+21+4+5=100
McKinsey
McKinsey
7 11 7 12 13 consultant
lifestyle senior consultant nice
HR McKinsey
9 Business Analyst
RB
7 15 RB
case interview
3000
HR
upstream downstream
breakdown
analyze 4 frustrated
A330 KLIA
KL
KLCC
McKinsey 9 5 workshop9 12
case
market size corporate strategy shampoo
P&G product line case
business McKinsey
9 12 PAR
PEI case
Dont worry, you
are doing fine.
5
feedback
2 Starbucks
2
That was a lot of calculation.PEI
case
earnings per orderearnings per service
email McKinsey
feedback
9 26 PAR
case
18
McKinsey McKinsey
409 offer
======================================================
====
etc
&
http://blog.renren.com/blog/11989/503990232
http://blog.renren.com/blog/11989/504370912
http://blog.renren.com/blog/11989/504738067
1V
OFFER OFFER
1997 1 2002
2003
1.1
2009 3.6506 7.0%
1.1.1 SGCC
500
1.1.1.1
7 (
) 2007 1.45
2272 3477
576.7
945.8
8 14
2852
1.1.1.2
2006
1.1.1.5
1.1.2 (CSG)
2002 12 29
3 6
2009 5239
500 156
1.2
2009
87407 10.23% 19679 22.51%
14.01% 65205 74.60% 8.16% 1613
92.26%
1.2.1 CHNG
1996 2000
2002
0.27 , 200
2008 26
111.813 2009 27
154 10438 2010 500 313
()
2010 3
4100
2100 2100
2392100
4352100
4602100
60
()(250260260 ) (
)(460)
()(633+260)
()(230+160)
()(266 )
()(232+260),
()(235+230+260)
()(266)
()(260)
()(130+133+232+270)
()(235+268)
()(232+263)
(260)
()(260)
()(430+260),
()(230+266 ),
()(436+260),
(230+160
1.2.2 (CGC)
3
2
2100/
260+360+2100
5000MW
2100
2100
2100
2100
2100
1.2.3 (CGC)
2002 12 29
153.9 2009
28
4778 1 10017.23
2010 7 500
412
2602100 2100
2100
2100
2 100
2 100
4 602 100
1.2.4 CHD
2002 12 29
120 2009
0.3432 3300
2115
800
4 33.5+260+2100
2100
266 +2100
2100 +2100
1.2.5 CPI
2100
2100
2100
2100 6100
1.2.6
400
600
100 2006 3
567 237
1.3
7127987.8
1893
736
551
451
428
379
2.1
2.2
7
8
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
2.3
2.3.1
2.3.2
2.3.3
2.3.4 (
2.3.5
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
2.3.6
2.3.7 KW
1 100
2 7200MW 2*600MW
2*1000 MW
3 7600MW2010 6000MW
4 100 454
5 300
6 2 66
7 8 60 300
8 10600MW, 2600MW
2.3.8 ABB
2.3.9
2.3.10
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8
1 2 2 3 4 5
2.3.11 60 KW
2.3.12
2.3.13 30-60 KW
2.3.14 133
6
7
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
2.3.15 10
2.3.16
2.4
,,,.
2
3
2.5
500
500
220
2.4
,,
1(),,
,,,.
,,,,.
,,.,,
,.
2, 35kV/110kV/220kV/500kV ,
.,
,,
,.
3,.,
(EMS),,
,.,.
4: ,.(
),(),.,,
,.,,
,.(
),,,,
,.
5: 35kV~220kV ,,,
EMBA14
10
30
1994 4
15 36
3 5
96 ; 1
10
10
5 11
2009 3 17
12
510
12
24
29 30
12 19
10
() kevin
()
1200 2400
10
2010 12 10
5
offer
offer 5
MCAMcK 8 06
AIESEC
McK/BCG/BAIN/BOOZ/ATK/MONITOR
McK/BCG/BAIN/ATK/MONITOR
PretalkMcK/BAIN/ATK/MONITORMcK
McK/BAIN/ATK/MONITOR
shock
5
40 40
PEVCleverage
MBA HARVARDWHARTONSTANFORD
CD consulting
vault
consulting BINGO
18
ROLE MODEL
5%leadership
-> 5%->
-> leadership ->->
500
CS
TechCrunch VC MBA
VC
Google
CS
VC
PTA
4
paper
offer PTA
case interview
IVEY-COCACOLA
IVEY
PE IB
McK PT McK
Part-time program
part-time cold call chart
HR
mentor part-time
performance
challenging
8 McK
chart
Again
literature search
Google
Google 6 0 6
investor relations
Google xxx ISI
Google
ISI Google Google
cold call
sizing
1. 2.
triangulate sizing
analyst report
reportMcK report
Google filetype:pdf
Google xx
BINGO
model top downbottom up Top down
bottom up
backup pages
10-12 page pack backup
pages
pack storyline
McK pack
pack backup page
knowledge brief BA
portfolio management case
BA BA
favorite
team
BA Manager
1. Impact
care care
2. So what
interesting managerso
what?
hypothesis
manager conclusion supporting evidence
manager
3. Hypothesis
hypothesis focus
interesting random
hypothesis
5 hypothesis
hypothesis
4. Understand client
Partner team
Partner 10
opening
AIESEC
sourcing
3 100,000
2
financially support 8
offer
2014
McK
N
GMAT 2
McK 2 2 EM Asso
3 AP P 1 15 behavioral45 case
MECE McK
2. http://www.caseinterview.com/ McK
offer YouTube case interview
case interview
consulting work
predictable case interview 3C
framework case
boil the ocean
boil the ocean
4. mock
6. mock caseKelloggHarvard
2
mock 200 case
case
7. case 3C case
8. mock manager
conduct interview
9. case case
framework
ATK
1.
case 4-5 A4 1 1 1-2
1
4-5 PPT chart
2. 90
3.
key finding
1
100
100
case
MOCK
ZHYSJNLWQ 4
OFFER
MONITOR MCK
4 3 candidates
MCA PTA
focus 3-5
MCA
4 offer
P.S.
MCA4
2 5%
10000
...