637 Speciric REFERENCES 1. Beces, G. E., “An Accurate Mechanical Solution of Statically Inde- terminate Structures by Use of Paper Modela and Special Gages,” Proc. Am. Cone. Inst., Vol. 18, 1922. 2. Baas, G. E., Discussion of “Design of a Multiple Arch System,” Trans. Am. Soc. Civ. Engrs., 88, 1208-30, 1925. 3. Beces, G. E., “The Use of Models in the Solution of Indeterminate Structures,” J. Franklin Inat., March, 1927. 4. Bucxincuam, E., “Model Experimenta and the Forms of Empirical Equations,” Trans. Am. Soc. Mech. Engrs., Vol. 37, June, 1915. 5. Butt, A, “A New Method for the Mechanical Analysis of Trusses,” Civ. Eng., December, 1930. 6. Egy, W. J., “New Deformeter Apparatus,” Eng. News Rec., February 16, 1939. 7. Enzy, W. J., “Model Analysis of Continuous Girders,” Civ. Eng., September, 1941. 8. Eney, W. J., “A Large Displacement Deformeter Apparatus for Stress Analysis with Elastic Models,” Proc. Soc. Exptl. Stress Ansl., Vol. 6, No. 2. 9. Eney, W. J., “Studies of Continuous Bridge Trusses with Models,” Proc. Soc. Ezpil. Stress Anal., Vol. 6, No. 2. 10. Engr, W. J., “Determining the Deflection of Structures with Models,” Civ. Eng., March, 1942. 11. Gorracuatx, 0., “Mechanical Calculation of Elastic Systems,” J. Franklin Inst., July, 1926. 12. McCutzoves, C.B. and Taare, E.8., Elastic Arch Bridges, pp. 282-306. New York: Wiley, 1931. 18. Mixts, B., “A Sensitive Contact Indicator,” Rev. Sct. Instr., February, 1941, 14, Moaxter, M, W. and Harrrevo, L. P., ‘The Design and Construction of a Deformeter for Use in Model Analysis.” Thesis for degree of Master of Civil Engineering, Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute, June, 1953. 15. Rugs, A. C. and Scumivr, E. O., “Mechanical Structural Analysis by the Moment Indicator,” Trans. Am. Soc. Civ. Engrs., Vol. 104, 1939. 16, Witsva, J. B. and Norris, C. H., Elementary Structural Analysis. New York: McGraw-Hill, 1948. 17, Wuavs, J. B., “Structural Analysis Laboratory Research,” Afass. Inst. Tech. Dept. Civ. San. Eng. Publ., 65, December, 1938; 68, December, 1939; 73, December, 1940; 80, December, 1941.638 MODEL ANALYSIS OF STRUCTURES [cuar. 14 GeNeRAL REFERENCES 18, Beaas, G. E., “Design of Elastic Structures from Paper Models,” Proc. ‘Am. Conc. Inst., 19, 53-66, 1923. * 19. Beoas, G. E., “Skew Arch Reactions Measured by Reciprocal Method,” Eng. News Rec., 92, 106, 1927. 20. Beaas, G. E., “‘Deformeter Analysis for Rigid Frame Bridges of High In- determinacy.” From The Rigid Frame Bridge, by A. G. Hayden. New York: Wiley, 1931. 21. Breas, G. E., Brrpsat, B., and Timsy, E. K., “Suspension Bridge Stresses Determined by Model,” Eng. News Rec.. 108, 828-32, 1932. 22, Beaas, G. E., ‘Tests of a Celluloid Model of the Stevenson Creek Dam,” Report of Arch Dam Investigation of Engineering Foundation, Vol. 1, Proc. Am. Soc. Civ, Engrs., Part 111, pp. 219-30. 23. Berrranp, M. J.,. ‘Notes on the Principle of Similitude,” Journal de VP’ Ecole Polytechnique, Cahier 32, 19, 189-97. 1848. 24, Bripaman. P. W., “Tolman’s Principle of Similitude,” Phys. Rev. Ser. 2, 8, 423-31, 1916. 25. Bripaman, P. W., Dimensional Analysis. 2nd ed. Yale University Press, 1931. 26. Buckinonam, E., “On Physically Similar Systems; Illustrations of the Use of Dimensional Equations,” Phys. Rev., Ser. 2, 4, 345-76, 1914. 27. Bucxincuam, E., “Notes on the Method of Dimensions,” Phil. Mag., Ser. 6, 42, 696-719, November, 1921. 28. Camppe ty, N., “Dimensional Analysis,” Phil. Mag., Ser. 6, 47, 481-04, March, 1924, 29. Cuicx, A. C., “Dimensional Analysis and the Principle of Similitude as Applied to Hydraulic Experiments with Models.” In Hydraulic Laboratory Practice, by J. R. Freeman, App. 15, pp. 775-827. Am. Soc. Mech. Engrs., 1929. 30. Dawuey, E. R., ‘Wind Pressure Tests Made on Large Model Building,” Eng. News Rec., 1928. 31. DenHanros, J. P., “Models in Vibration Research,” Trana. Am. Soc. Civ. Engrs., $4, 153, 1932. 32. Enrenrest-Aranassyewa, Mrs. T., ‘Dimensional Analysis Viewed from the Standpoint of the Theory of Similitudes,” Phil. Mag. Scr. 7, 1, 257-72, January, 1926. 33. Fremmna, R., ‘Mechanical Mcthod for Determining Reactions of a Continuous Girder,” Eng. News Rec., 83, 428, 1919. 34. Foaa, R. J., “Load Test of Large Model of Cellular Concrete Arch,” Eng. News Rec., 102, 418, 1929.REFERENCES 639 85. Grpsox, A. H., “The Principle of Dynamic Similarity, with Special Reference to Model Experiments,” Erg. (London), 117, 325-27, 357-59, 391-93, 422-23. 1924. 36. Grason, A. H., ‘The Use of Models in Engineering,” Proc. Inst. Mech. Engre., pp. 53-64, 1924. 87. Guick, G. W., “Rigid Rectangular Frame Foundation for Albany Tcle- phone Building,” Eng. News Rec., 105, 836-38, 1930. 38. Gorrscuatx, O., “Structural Analysis Based upon Principles Pertaining to Unloaded Models,” Trans. Am. Soc. Civ. Engrs., 103, 1019, 1938. 39. Green, N. B., “Fiexible ‘First Story’ Construction for Earthquake Re- sistance,” Trans. Am. Soc. Civ. Engrs., 100, 645, 1935. 40. Groat, B. F., “Models, Properly Designed, Show Correctly Performance of Dams and Turbines,” Eng. Rec., 72, 377, 1915. 41. Groat, B. F., “Ice Diversion, Hydraulic Models, and Hydraulic Simi- larity,” Trans. Am. Soc. Civ. Engrs., 82, 1139-90, 1918. Also Can. Eng., ‘34, 55-58, January 17, 1918. 42. Groat, B. F., ‘Theory of Similarity and Models,” Trans. Am. Soc. Cie.” Engrs., 96, 273-386, 1932. 43. Heramann, W., “The Conditions for Dynamic Similarity,” Verein DeutscKer Ingenieure, 75, 611-16, 1931. 44, Hoven, B. K., “Stability of Embankment Foundations,” Trans. Am. Soc. Civ. Engra., 103, 1414, 1938. 45. Jouansen, F. C., “Research in Mechanical Engineering by Small Seale Apparatus,” Proc. Inst. Mech. Engrs., March 14, 1929. Also Eng. (London), 127 (1927): 371-73, 407-9, 469-70, 567-68, 655-58. 46. Kanrov, A. V. and Tewrun, R. L., “Building and Testing an Arch Dam Model,” Civ. Eng., 2, 11-16, January, 1932. 47, Lamsert, B. J., “Gravity Dams Arched Down Stream,” Trans. Am. Soc. Civ. Engrs., 96, 1178, 1932. 48. Levy, H., “The Principles of Dynamic Similarity.” In Glazebrook, Dictionary of Applied Physics. New York: Macmillan, 1922. 49. Lyse, I. and Mapsen, I. E., “Structural Behavior of Battle Deck Floor Systems,” Trans. Am. Soc. Civ. Engrs., 104, 244, 1939. 50. Lyse, I. and Black, W. E., “An Investigation of Stee! Rigid Frames,” Trans. Am. Soc. Civ. Engrs., 107, 127, 1942. - 51. McCuntouas, C. B., “Derivation of Theories Underlying Mechanical Methods of Stress Analysis,” Eng. News Rec., 105, 489-90, 1930. 52, Morsserrr, L. S., ‘Designing the Towers of the Hudson River Bridge,” Eng. News Rec., 100, 819, 1928. 53. Morsseter, L. 8., “George Washington Bridge: Design of the Towers,” Trans. Am. Soc. Civ. Engre., 97, 179, 1933.640 MODEL ANALYSIS OF STRUCTURES [cuap, 14 54, Nexson, M.E., “Laboratory Tests on Hydraulic Models of the Hastings Dam,” Univ. Iowa Stud. Eng., Bull. 2, 1982. 55, Newton, Sin Isaac, Principia, Book II, Theorem XXVI, Propositions XXXII and XXXIII and Corollaries 1 and 2. 1687. 56. Noris, C. H., “Model Analysis of Structures,” Proc. Soc. Exptl. Stress Res. Vol. 1, No. 2. 57. O’Brien, M. P., “Analyzing Hydraulic Models for Effects of Distortion,” Eng. News Rec., 109, 313-15, 1932. 58. Orrtey, J. W. and Bricutmore, A. W., “Experimental Investigations of the Stresses in Masonry Dams Subjected to Water Pressure,” Proc. Inst. Civ. Eng. (London), 172, 89-106, 1908. 59. Prrrarp, A. J. 8. and Baxer, J. F., “An Experimental Investigation into the Properties of Certain Framed Structures Having Redundant Jsracing Members,” Aeronaut. Res. Comm. Tech. Rep. (Great Britain), 2: 611-35, 1924-1925. 60. Porter, A. W., “Units, dimensions of (ineluding the principles of dynamic similarity),” Encyclopedia Britannica, 22, 853-86, 1929. 61. Ratason, J. C., “Crown Stresses in a Skew Arch,” Trans. Am. Soc. Civ. Engrs., 94, 135-60, 1930. 62. Ratapon, J. C., “Simple Model Checks Indeterminate Structures,” Civ. Eng., 1: 131-32, 1930. 63. Rarasun, J. C., “An Analysis of Multiple Skew Arches on Elastic Piers,” Trans. Am. Soc. Civ. Engrs., 98, 1-45, 1933. 64. Ratason, J. C., “Wind Forces on a Tall Building,” Trans. Am. Soc. Civ. Engrs., 105, 1, 1940. 65. Ravzeion, J. W. S., ‘The Principle of Similitude,” Nature, 98, 66-68, or Sci. Pap., Vol. 6, pp. 300-305, 1915. 66. Rernoxps, K. C., “‘Notes on the Laws of Hydraulic Similitude as Applied to Experiments with Models.” In Hydraulic Laboratory Practice, by J. R. Free- man, App. 14, pp. 759-73. Am. Soc. Mech. Engrs., 1929. 67. Routn, E. J., “The Principle of Sjmilitude,” “On Models,” ‘Theory of Dimensions,” Dynamics of Rigid Bodies. Part I, Arts. 367-74, pp. 292-96. 6th ed. New York: Macmillan, 1897. 68. Ruse, A. C., “Earthquake Resistance of Elevated Water-Tanks,” Trans. Am. Soc. Civ. Engrs., 103, 889, 1938. 69. Savage, J. L. and Houx, I. E., “Checking Arch Dam Design with Models,” Civ. Eng., 1, 695-99, 1931. 70. Savaae, J. L. and Houk, I. News Rec., 108, 494-99, 1932. 7\, Seety, F. B. and James, R. V., “The Plaster-Model Method of Determin- ing Stresses Applied to Curved Beams,” Bull. No. 195, Eng. Expl. Sta., Univ. ML, 1929. “Model Tests of Hoover Dam,” Eng.REFERENCES 641 72. Suits, B. A., “Experimental Deformations of a Cylindrical Arched Dam,” Trans. Am. Soc. Civ. Engrs., 91, 705-30, 1927. 73. Sretwuan, D. B., “The St. John’s Suspension Bridge,” Eng. News Rec., 104, 272-77, 1930. 74, Sramuan, D. B., “Rigidity und Aerodynamic Stability of Suspension Bridges,” Trans. Am, Soc. Civ. Engrs., 110, 439, 1945. 75. TemPuin, R. L., ‘Tests of Engineering Structures and Their Models,” Trans. Am. Soc. Civ. Engrs., 102, 1211, 1937. 76. Tuomson, J. T., “Model Analysis of » Reinforced Concrete Arch,” Publ. Ras, Vol. 9. No. 11. 77. TreTsE08, O. G., “Use of Models in Aerodynamics and Hydrodynamics,” Trans. Am. Soc. Mech. Engrs., 54, 225-33, September, 1932. 78. Tiwpy, E. K., Mea, L. M., and McEupowney, R., “Moments in Flex- ible Two-Hinged Arches,” Trans. Am. Soc. Civ. Engrs., 110, 35, 1945. 79. Touman, R. C., “The Principle of Similitude,” Phys. Rev. Ser. 2, 3, 244, 1914. 80. Touman, R. C., “The Specific Heat of Solids and the Principle of Simili- tude,” Phys. Rev. Ser. 2, 4, 145-53, 1914. 81. Touman, R. C., “The Principle of Similitude and the Principle of Di- mensional Homogencity,” Phys. Rev. Ser. 2, 6, 219-33, 1915. 82. Voce, H. D. and Dean, J. P., “Geometric versus Hydraulic Similitude,” Civ. Eng., 2, 467-71, 708-09, August, 1932. 83. Wenen, W., “The Fundamentals of the Mechanics of Similitude and Its Use in Model Experiments,” Jahrbuch der Schiffsbautechnischen Gesellschaft, 20, 355. 1919. 84. Werner, W., “The General Principles of Similitude in Physics and Their Relation to Dimensional Theory and the Science of Model Testing,” Jahrbuch der Schiffsbautechnischen Gesellschaft. Berlin: J. Springer, Bd. 31, 1930. 85. Weiner, B. L., Discussion of Paper No. 1827, “An Analysis of Multiple Skew Arches on Elastic Piers,” Trans. Am. Soc. Cir. Engrs.. 98, 46, 1933. 86. WiuutaMs, H. A., “Dynamic Distortions in Structures Subjected to Sudden Earth Shock,” Truns. Am. Soc. Civ. Engre., 102, 838, 1937. 87. Witson, J. S. and Gore, W.. “Stresses in Dams; An Experimental Investigation by Means of India Rubbt Models,” Proc. Inst. Civ. Eng. (London), 172, 107-33, 1908. 88. Witson, W. M., “Laboratory Tests of Multiple-Span Reinforced Conerete Arch Bridges,” Trane. Am. Soc. Civ. Engrs., 100, 424, 1935. 89. Wirver, F. P. and Bonner, H. H., “Tall Building Frames Studied by ‘Means of Mechanical Models,” Trans. Am, Soc. Civ. Ergrs., 102, 244, 1939.