eenoLoaieo DEPARTAMENTO DE METALMECANICA INGENIERIA ELECTROMECANICA INNOVACION Y DESARROLLO DE PRODUCTOS PROFESOR: DR. ROGELIO NAVARRO RIZO TRIZ (Yeoriya Resheniya Izobreatatelskikh Zadatch ) PROCEDIMIENTO GENERICO Y CASOS DE ESTUDIO DE APLICACION DEL METODO. REPORTE DE INVESTIGACION RESPONSABLES DEL REPORTE Le6n, GTO. México, Viernes 7 de Abril del 2017CONTENIDO DEL REPORTE . INTRODUCCION A LA METODOLOGIA TRIZ. 1.1 Niveles de soluciones inventivas 1.2 Las leyes de evolucién de los Sistemas Técnicos NOCIONES FSENCIALES. 2.1 Inercia mental 2.2 Idealidad 2.3 Las contradicciones 2.4 Los recursos . HERRAMIENTAS PARA PREVENIR LA INERCIA PSICOLOGICA. HERRAMIENTAS DE SOLUCION 4.1 Mattiz para resolucién de contradicciones técnicas, 4.1.1 Los 39 Parimetros. 4.1.2 Los 40 Principios. 4.1.3 Matriz de contradieciones. 4.2 Métodos para resolver las contradicciones fisicas 4.3 Algoritmo de resolucién de problemas inventivos ARIZ. ANALISIS DE ARTICULOS QUE APLICAN TRIZ. 5.1 Definicion de! Problema. 5.2 Clasificacién del problema y seleccién de la herramienta a aplicar. 5.3 Solucisn del problema. 5.4 Evaluacion de la solucién. CONCLUSIONES GENERALES FUENTES CONSULTADAS. ANEXOS (Articulos analizados)En el reporte se debersin describir para cada Articulo las cuatro (4) etapas del proceso TRIZ como a Thetisubjeddn'swaikbraihé. is replaced by a more general “tooth cleaning device.” The object “teeth” is Ghanerdes ésiptcla,testtuicatustt dgarmpssegtecise. The action “brush” is changed to a more general te demove Un E:Mibieh NS hte Modelling, many possible choices of “subjects” and “actions can bélaRinbinnscetiisioFor example, we can use hydraulic action to clean teeth, or chemical action to clean éey tipo ResiAasYAMe SABA BREMITEAPSAN sGlelaR¥l, 0 make them dirt free and so on. Clearly, this altemative functional modelling opens the door for problem solving and innovation, (G) Problem solution, and (4) Solution evaluation. (2) Problem classification and tool sele ier we are finished with. the problem definition, we should Repable to classify the problem into the Pie S rt EATON Sa SR EHR AS he McGraw-tiill Company, USA Physical contradiction (1) PMedthodsd@tigiizad contradiction resolution and separation principles. if ae important step. The quality of the solution is highly dependent on problem det , einody. ATU RGR sta several question Inperted functional Suclas TAS BABES GE on | aWitheris ake imeedequate useful functions or lack of needed useful functions 22 ltaets afk sung erHierprd denetions Methods, Functional improvement methods and TRIZ. standard solutions 3 EROALE Wipte LHYETHIS SSBIERPIEELT MENA MEW Stem is too complex and costly, and some of its 4funstiangsaa Dewianinated pacambingd. is the current solution not good? Methods. Trimming and pruning. ThesSvstempimnsnvemenénd hisipreblen araiys WhendhaaupRNesh st maisdenedtehiad. pussenbancengns able tonseded tnchsatsbaenenstifjae-and focus on the right problem area. Besides answering these common quesNiathad., Exe 'nRon aidarhnoieg gabsystemsipful in the problem definition stage, Develop useful functions. This problem occurs when we can identify what useful functions are needed Fundgioneronmdarsnsiem buuverdnaethnayshonmeareata lisse LuBetipAsject scope, it is very helpful to cestabVethadss eynial, serail ane enomaetiicie(lsetsdatabyse project. Functional modelling and analysis tenables us to see the problem more clearly and precisely 2 Solution generation . Example: Toothbrush Problem Revisited Assume that we are,a toothbrush manufacturer, and the current AAerap ReIaRD GASH tiga densa teal, RAC meena ae dtecaaleRe ARE REPU ah ‘Ba WAlterear ign SAUER RUA SUfQUAKn These solutions will be evaluated in the next step. (4) Concept evaluation prob gsi Probe nei evaluat and select the best solution. These ‘conceprevaltation methods include Pugh concept There are many concept evaluation methods favean] methods are often not PRIZ related. The freqaeMIy Ws sflection, value engineering. and the axiomatic desien method. By analyzing the ftinctionai diagram, we may come up with the following pi 1. The current lack of performance may be caused by “inadequate actio diagram is the following sibilities: that is, the actual functional Brush [reotnorusn} Sesh =] If that is the case, it belongs to the problem of “inadequate functional performance,” and we can use the TRIZ standard solution technique to resolve this problem, statement “toothbrush ction only. We 2. We may find the current functional model is too limiting, because the functi brushes teeth” limits our solution to using the brush only and to using me can develop the following alternative functional modelling: [Foon cleaning] Remove _f a [Dir in root]