1

IN THE COURT OF CIVIL AND FAMILY JUDGE, SUKKUR

Family Suit No. 152 of 2010

Huma Asif Wife of Muhammad Asif Khwaja

Muslim, Adult, Presently Residing at Khuwaja
Mohalla Station Road Sukkur, UC No. 7, Sukkur----------------Plaintiff
VERSUS
Muhammad Asif Khwaja son of Khwaja
Khalid Jawed, adult, Muslim resident
of Bungalow No. B-103, Block-I, North
Nazimabad, UC No. 7 Karachi central -------------------------Defendant.

DAIRY
28-04-2012

Suit Called. Advocate for plaintiff sent adjournment

application Defendant with counsel present in the interest of justice
put off to 19-05-2012 for cross of defendant side.
Sd/-
Family Judge/Civil Judge &
Judicial Magistrate
SUKKUR
CERTIFIED TO BE TRUE COPY

FAMILY JUDGE & CIVIL JUDGE SUKKUR

certified applied for on: ( May two Thousand Twelve)

Cost estimated on: ( May two Thousand Twelve)
Cost deposited on: ( May two Thousand Twelve)
Stamps supplied on: ( May two Thousand Twelve)
Copy made reedy on: ( May two Thousand Twelve)
Copy certified on: ( May two Thousand Twelve)
Copy delivered on: ( May two Thousand Twelve)

Copying fee Rs.

Comparing fee Rs. .
Total fee Rs.
Copied by:
Compared by:
Read by: Record keeper
Family court and civil court
Sukkur.
 2

IN THE COURT OF CIVIL AND FAMILY JUDGE, SUKKUR

Guardian Ship Application No. 38 of 2011

Muhammad Asif Khwaja son of Khwaja

Khalid Jawed, Muslim, adult, resident
of Bungalow No. B-103, Block-I, North
Nazimabad, Karachi -------------------------Applicant
VERSUS
Mst. Huma D/o Khwaja Muneer, Muslim,
Adult, R/o Khuwaja Mohalla Station
Road Sukkur -------------------------Opponent

DAIRY
28-04-2012

Matter Called. Both parties called absent advocate for

opponent submitted objection on application. Order on it. Put off to
15-05-2012 for argument on both application and filling objection on
application Under Section 151 CPC. Sd/-
Family Judge/Civil Judge &
Judicial Magistrate
SUKKUR
CERTIFIED TO BE TRUE COPY
 3

FAMILY JUDGE & CIVIL JUDGE SUKKUR

certified applied for on: ( May two Thousand Twelve)

Cost estimated on: ( May two Thousand Twelve)
Cost deposited on: ( May two Thousand Twelve)
Stamps supplied on: ( May two Thousand Twelve)
Copy made reedy on: ( May two Thousand Twelve)
Copy certified on: ( May two Thousand Twelve)
Copy delivered on: ( May two Thousand Twelve)

Copying fee Rs.

Comparing fee Rs. .
Total fee Rs.
Copied by:
Compared by:
Read by: Record keeper
Family court and civil court
Sukkur.

Deposition of the Mst. Huma D/o Muneer Ahmed khwaja ,

 4

Dated:-10-02-2012
Re-called and Re-affirmed Oath.
Cross to Mr Parmanand Advocate for Defendant.

I have passed B.Sc. It is correct to suggest that I

read over the contents of affidavit in evidence. It is fact that defendant
was my relative, prior to my marriage. It is a fact that the defendant
was the person of good character before my marriage. It is a fact that
the list of dowry articles was written by me. I can not say about the
date and time of producing the list of dowry articles before this court,
but I can say that during pendency of this suit, I had produced list of
dowry articles. It is a fact that my all dowry articles were purchased
by my parents. I dont remember the actual date of producing the
receipts of dowry articles. It is a fact that my marriage was
solemnized in the year 1992. It is a fact that my marriage was
solemnized in the year 1992, but the set of Nokia C-10 was
introduced in the year 2010. It is a fact that the defendant belongs to
rich family and all the dowry articles were kept in the house of
defendant. The witness Khuwaja Saleem Ahmed is my relative. It is a
fact that Khuwaja Saleem Ahmed is my relative. It is a fact that
Khuwaja Saleem Ahmed is step cousin of the defendant. It is
incorrect to suggest that only five Tola gold ornaments were given to
me by my parents at the time of marriage which are lying in my
custody. I do not remember that the list of 39 Tola gold which is
produced before this court. It is incorrect to suggest that after my
marriage, the defendant kept me happy every time. It is a fact that the
defendant complained to Khuwja Iqbal for the settlement of dispute
since 10 years before filling of the suit. It is incorrect to suggest that
prior to filling of this suit on 21-4-2011 I along with my father went to
the house of defendant to return the dowry articles including 60 Tola
gold ornaments and other house hold articles. It is a fact that during
pendency of suit, the notables had come to our house for settlement
of the dispute. But I dont remember its contents. It is incorrect to
suggest that defendant is the defendant is the person of good
 5

character. It is incorrect to suggest that the dowry articles are not

present in the house of defendant. It is incorrect to suggest that I am
deposing falsely.
No Re S.R.O & AC
Sd/-10-02-2012
Civil & Family judge Sukkur

CERTIFIED TO BE TRUE COPY

FAMILY JUDGE AND CIVIL JUDGE SUKKUR

Certified Copy Applied For On ( February two thousand twelve )

Cost Estimated On ( February two thousand twelve )
Cost Deposited On ( February two thousand twelve )
Stamps Supplied On ( February two thousand twelve )
Copy Certified On ( February two thousand twelve )
Copy Delivered On ( February two thousand twelve )

Copying Fee Rs
Comparing Fee. Rs

Total Fee. Rs
Copied by:
Compared by: Record Keeper
Read by: Family & Civil Court Sukkur

IN THE COURT OF CIVIL AND FAMILY JUDGE, SUKKUR

Family Suit No. 152 of 2010

Huma Asif Wife of Muhammad Asif Khwaja

Muslim, Adult, Presently Residing at Khuwaja
Mohalla Station Road Sukkur, UC No. 7, Sukkur----------------Plaintiff
VERSUS
Muhammad Asif Khwaja son of Khwaja
Khalid Jawed, adult, Muslim resident
of Bungalow No. B-103, Block-I, North
Nazimabad, UC No. 7 Karachi central -------------------------Defendant.

Deposition of the Muneer Ahmed Khuwaja S/o Khuwaja Riaz Ahmed

Dated:-10-02-2012
Re-called and Re-affirmed Oath.
Cross to Mr Parmanand Advocate for Defendant.
 6

I do not remember the number of witnesses of this

marriage. It is a fact that Muhammad Saleem was the witness of the
defendant. It is a fact that I had purchase all the dowry articles. It is a
fact that I have not produced receipts of dowry articles before this
court. The list of dowry articles was prepared by me. It is a fact that
according to shariat-e-Muhammadi, I was not supposed to give huge
dowry articles to bride, I, voluntarily say that according to the custom
in the society, I had given such dowry articles to my daughter. It is a
fact that Muhammad Asif is a man of good character and rich person.
He belongs to rich family. It is incorrect to suggest that I gave five
Tola gold to my daughter and other dowry articles to my daughter. It is
incorrect to suggest that on 21-4-2011, I along with plaintiff, went to
the house of the defendant and took 60 Tola gold and other dowry
articles and brought to Sukkur. It is incorrect to suggest that
nekmards Muhammad Iqbal used to visit the house of plaintiff for
compromise between the parties. It is incorrect to suggest that
Muhammad Asif kept happy to my daughter. It is incorrect to suggest
that I am deposing false. It is incorrect to suggest that I did not give
dowry articles to my daughter.
No Re S.R.O & AC
Sd/-10-02-2012
Civil & Family judge Sukkur
IN THE COURT OF CIVIL AND FAMILY JUDGE, SUKKUR
Family Suit No. 152 of 2010

Huma Asif Wife of Muhammad Asif Khwaja

Muslim, Adult, Presently Residing at Khuwaja
Mohalla Station Road Sukkur, UC No. 7, Sukkur----------------Plaintiff
VERSUS
Muhammad Asif Khwaja son of Khwaja
Khalid Jawed, adult, Muslim resident
of Bungalow No. B-103, Block-I, North
Nazimabad, UC No. 7 Karachi central -------------------------Defendant.

Deposition of the Khuwaja Saleem Ahmed S/o Muhammad Ameen

Dated:-10-02-2012
Re-called and Re-affirmed Oath.
Cross to Mr Parmanand Advocate for Defendant.
 7

It is a fact that the defendant Muhammad Asif is my step

cousin. I do not remember as to whether I was witness of this Nikha .
It is a fact that I was witness of Nikah and my signature is not present
in Nikahnama. I do not remember the date of Nikah, but it was
December 1992. It is a fact that I do not remember the names of
other witnesses of this marriage. It is a fact that while packing, I did
not see the dowry articles. I was witness from plaintiff side. It is
incorrect to suggest that the relations between plaintiff and defendant
remained good but I voluntarily say that I did not receive any
complain from either side. It is incorrect to suggest that on 21-4-2011,
I had gone to the house of the defendant. It is a fact that the
defendant is the man of good character. It is incorrect to suggest that
the father of plaintiff took away 60 Tola gold and other house hold
articles from the house of defendant. It is incorrect to suggest that
defendant Muhammad Asif had dispute with the plaintiffs father and
witness. It is incorrect to suggest that plaintiff filed false suit against
defendant. It is incorrect to suggest that the dowry articles are not
present in the house of defendant. It is incorrect to suggest that I am
deposing falsely at the instance of plaintiff.
No Re S.R.O & AC
Sd/-10-02-2012
Civil & Family judge Sukkur