Professional Documents
Culture Documents
structures en acier
Robert Tremblay
cole Polytechnique, Montral, Canada
Juin 2015
Ductile
response
Fu
Profiter de la Fy
1.5 1.5
1.28 W
1.0 1.0
0.5 0.5
V/W
-0.5 -0.5
h
-1.0 -1.0
-1.5 -1.5
0.0126 h -2.0 -1.5 -1.0 -0.5 0.0 0.5 1.0 1.5 2.0
Elastic 1.0
/ h (%)
/ h (%) 0.0
-1.0
W 0.5
Horizontal 90 deg.
T = 0.38 s h ag (g) 0.0
5% damping
-0.5
1.5
1.0
0.5
M / Mpr
0.0
-0.5
-1.0
-1.5
-0.06 -0.04 -0.02 0.00 0.02 0.04 0.06
cole Polytechnique de Montral, 1996 Plastic Rotation (rad.)
1.0 1.0
-0.5 -0.5
h
-1.0 -1.0
-2.0 -1.5 -1.0 -0.5 0.0 0.5 1.0 1.5 2.0
1.0
Vy = 0.25 W / h (%)
/ h (%) 0.0
-1.0
-0.017 h
1.5 1.5
1.28 W
1.0 1.0
0.5 0.5
V/W
-0.5 -0.5
h -1.0 -1.0
-1.5 -1.5
0.0126 h -2.0 -1.5 -1.0 -0.5 0.0 0.5 1.0 1.5 2.0
Elastic 1.0
/ h (%)
/ h (%) 0.0
-1.0
W 0.5
Horizontal 90 deg.
T = 0.38 s h ag (g) 0.0
5% damping
-0.5
1.2
0.8
+
0.4
P / Py 0.0
Plastic -
P -0.4
Hinge
P+
-0.8
HSS 102x76x6.4 - KL/r = 112
-1.2
-8 -4 0 4 8
/ y
R. Tremblay, Ecole Polytechnique of Montreal 5
0.4 0.4
0.2 0.2
V/W
h -0.2 -0.2
-0.4 -0.4
-0.36 W 0.018 h -2.0 -1.5 -1.0 -0.5 0.0 0.5 1.0 1.5 2.0
-1.0
0.2 0.2
V/W
h -0.2 -0.2
-0.4 -0.4
-2.0 -1.5 -1.0 -0.5 0.0 0.5 1.0 1.5 2.0
Vy = 0.25 W 1.0
/ h (%)
/ h (%) 0.0
-1.0
-0.017 h
W 0.5
Horizontal 90 deg.
T = 0.38 s ag (g) 0.0
h
5% damping
-0.5
Fracture,
instability,
etc.
Taiwan 1999
Norme CSA-S16
Handbook
de lICCA
< 2 S(0.2 s) IE W
S(Ta) Mv IE W 3 Ro Rd
V=
Ro Rd
> V (2.0 s)
0.80
Elastic
V/W
0.20
0.00
0.0 1.0 2.0 3.0 4.0
Period (s)
Contreventement Contreventement
avec diagonales Contreventement excentrique
concentrique
confines
End-plate
Bending
Elastic
V/W
0.20
V/W
(Rd = 4.0, Ro = 1.5)
Ductile MRF
0.05 (Rd = 5.0, Ro = 1.5)
0.00
0.0 1.0 2.0 3.0 4.0
Period (s)
Article SRFS
27.1 Gnralits
27.2 - 4 Cadres rigides
27.5 - 6 Contreventements concentriques
27.7 Contreventements excentriques
27.8 Contreventements confins
27.9-10 Refends
27.11 Construction conventionnelle
27.12 Constructions parasismique spciales
27.1 Gnralits
Chapitre 27 pour systmes conus avec Rd > 1.5,
sauf article 27.10
Calcul par capacit est exig
RoRd
(typ.)
Feui lle de
tabl ier mtall ique
typ.)
V
Perimeter Brace
Contr eventement Poteau members connections Foundations
(typ.) (typ.)
V V
Roof Bracing Anchor rods
Diaphragm members
1.0
0.5
P / AgFy
0.0
-0.5
HSS 127x76x4.78
G40.21-350W (CAT. C)
-1.0 KL/r = 93
-6 -4 -2 0 2 4 6
y
Kobe 1995
Assemblages pouvant
accomoder les dformations
des diagonales
Kobe 1995
Kobe
1995
G G
Vf 1. Choisir les diagonales :
27.1 Gnralits
Chapitre 27 pour systmes conus avec Rd > 1.5, sauf
article 27.10
Calcul par capacit exig, mais les efforts peuvent
tre limits ceux correspondant RdRo = 1.3
Intgrit du systme de rsistance aux charges de
gravit maintenue sous les dformations anticipes
Acier des lments ductiles :
Fy < 350 MPa (480 pour poteaux); Fy < 0.85 Fu
Rsilience minimum pour profils lourds et tles paisses si
IESaFa(0.2 s) > 0.55
Rsilience minimum pour mtal dapport dans les soudures
sauf si IESaFa(0.2 s) > 0.35
R. Tremblay, cole Polytechnique de Montral 38
P P
K
k k
1
W W
h
8 EP - Sans P-
6 EP - P-
0.2 EP - Sans P-
/ h (%)
4
EP - P-
0.1
2
0 V/W 0.0
-2
-0.1
-4
0.5 -0.2
ag (g)
0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16 18 20
Temps (s)
U2Vy
Vy
V'y
x U2
max
Cf /h
1
1.3 R y Vr /
1.3 R y Vr /
1.3 R y Vr /
Zones protges
CBFs
R. Tremblay, cole Polytechnique de Montral 45
W = 600 kN
W530x92
Location: Victoria
W610x140
W610x140
v = 0.30, Za = 6, Zv = 5
F = I = 1.0
4600
Type D MRF
Steel: G40.21-300W
Frame braced
out-of-plane at
4000 4000 beam-column joints
Ib = 552x106 mm4
Ic = 1120x106 mm4
Poteaux (gnral)
Efforts induits par rotules plastiques dans les poutres
Efforts minimum pour les joints de continuit
R. Tremblay, cole Polytechnique de Montral 55
L Cf, i+1
w w
w
1.1 Ry Mpb
Vh M'rc, i+1
1.1 Ry Mpb
1.1 Ry Mpb
Vh Vh
1.1 Ry Mpb
M'rc, i Vh
L'
Cf, i
L' = L - 2 x - dc x + dc/2 x + dc/2
V h = wL' / 2 + 2.2 R y Mpb / L'
w
V
1.1 Ry Mpb
1.1 Ry Mpb
Vh
1.1 Ry Mpb
Vh Vh 1.1 Ry Mpb
Vh
L'
V
x + dc/2 x + dc/2
Vr = 0.55 dc w Fyc ou
Assemblages poutres-poteaux
Comportement vrifi par essais:
V
hs/2
hs/2
L/2 L/2
0.04
0.02
/ h s 0.00
-0.02
R = 2.0
-0.04 R = 3.5
R = 5.0
R. Tremblay, cole Polytechnique de Montral 58
< 1980
Poutres 400-450 mm
Poutres 800-1000 mm
> 1980
3000 Mp
1000
-1000
-2000
Mp
-3000
-5000
-0.04 -0.03 -0.02 -0.01 0 0.01 0.02 0.03 0.04
M. Englehardt, U. Texas
AISC 358-05
Assemblages avec
section de poutre rduite
M. Englehardt
cole Poytechnique
200
150
APPLIED LOAD (kN)
100
50
-50
-100
-150
-200
cole Polytechnique
-200 -150 -100 -50 0 50 100 150 200
DISPLACEMENT, (mm)
R. Tremblay, cole Polytechnique de Montral 66
Poteaux de classe 1
Assemblages
poutres-poteaux: Poutre de classe 1 ou 2
Exemple
Cadre Type D
0.0265
MvS(2.0) = 1.0x1.17x0.17 = 0.199 0.00
Ta,max (Strength) Ta,max (Drift)
V = 0.0457 W = 3009 kN
R. Tremblay, cole Polytechnique de Montral 69
Y Y
0.053 FY 0.053 FY 0.053 FY 0.053 FY
+/- 0.053 FY = 0 +/- (0.75 x 6.3 FY ) / (2 x 45)
0.525 FY = 0.5 FY + (0.25 x 6.3 FY ) / 63
0.475 FY = 0.5 FY - (0.25 x 6.3 FY ) / 63
0.475 FY
0.525 FY
0.525 FY
0.475 FY
FY FY
CR CR
CM 6.3 FY CM
6.3 FY
X X
0.053 FY 0.053 FY 0.053 FY 0.053 FY
623
= 16.0 m
262
522 522 623
1806 181 361 361 623 803 803
362 362 722 722 803
181 2207 221 441 441 803 781 781
442 803
442 442 883 883 781
362 221 2512 251 502 502 781 4.5 m
442
339 790 1582 1582
442 251 781 [kN, kN-m]
339
790
6 7
MGrav :
3@3m=9m
88 kN 88 kN
Poutres niveau 1 :
8.0 kN/m
Mf = 230 + (339 + 442)
= 1011 kN-m
230 kN-m 230 kN-m
=> W690x170
Mf
Levels 1-4
R. Tremblay, cole Polytechnique de Montral 72
1058 kN-m
144 kN
384 kN
2.5 m 3.0 m 2.5 m
Conception prliminaire :
B C B C 2 3 4
Level
W840x193 Braces W840x193 Braces W530x92 W530x92 W530x92
5
W360x196
W360x287
W360x287
W150x37 W150x37
W1000x272 W1000x272 W610x125 W610x125 W610x125
W310x158
W360x162
W310x158
W310x143
4
W250x58 W250x58
W1000x272 W1000x272 W690x152 W690x152 W690x152
3
W250x58 W250x58
W1000x314 W1000x272 W690x170 W690x170 W690x170
2
W360x237
W360x347
W360x347
W360x287
W360x287
W360x262
W360x262
W310x67 W250x58
W920x449 W920x420 W690x170 W690x170 W690x170
1
W250x89 W200x86
Analyse :
478 47 5 58 2 58 7
1722 246 18 0 341 34 0 74 2 741 779
{
553 F
530 +
24
25 T (e = +6.3 m)
+ 68 N
65
= 646 F + T + N
619
x U2 = 1.268
819 U2 (F+T+N)
785
+
254 168 D+0.5L+0.25S
110 139
R. Tremblay, cole Polytechnique de Montral 75
des poutres :
8.0 kN/m
254 kN-m
134 kN 114 kN 168 kN-m
D + 0.5L + 0.25 S
b) c) 88 kN 88 kN
6 7
Mpr = 1431 kN-m
3.0 m 3.0 m 3.0 m 8.0 kN/m
1431 kN-m
-821 -987
-145
246 kN 1431 kN-m
484 kN
Mcf = 1618 kN-m 531
Mf 504
360
0.585 m 2.415 m 3.0 m 2.428 m 0.572 m
Lateral Loads Towards Line 7
ZRyFy = 1925 kN-m 6 7
Moments Mpr 2 3 4 5 6 7
Mpr (kN-m)
W530x82 W530x82 W530x82 W530x82 W530x82
598
Lh = 8022 L h= 8013 L h= 8013 Lh = 8013 Lh= 8022
W360x162
W360x237
W360x237
W360x237
W360x237
W360x162
W360x314
W360x314
W360x314
W360x314
W360x196
[kN-m]
175 kN
419 kN
2082 = [1178 + 177(0.346) - 8.0(0.3462/2)]/0.595
Vpz = 2082 + 2221 573 - 104 = 3626 kN 2221 kN
677 kN
2082 kN
Type MD : Rd = 3.0
Type LD : Rd = 2.0
Type CC : Rd = 1.5
Tous : Ro = 1.3
Limites de hauteur
T/S (X ou autres) 20 m 40 m
0.8
f f f
P / AgFy
0.4
0.0
.
-0.4
25
20
15
10
f = 2.4 + 8.3
0
0.0 0.5 1.0 1.5 2.0 2.5
Brace Slenderness, = (Fy / Fe)0.5
Northridge 1994
P. Maranian, Brandow & Assoc. Tremblay (2002)
L
N
LH
Compression Strength
1.0 Fy = 350 MPa, n = 1.34
C u / AFy
0.8
Contreventement Cu (at buckling)
C'u (at a ductility of 3.0)
0.5
Tension/Compression 0.3
ou 0.0
Tension/Seulement ? 2.0
AFy / (Vf / cos )
1.5
V 1.0
Brace Cross-Section Area
0.5 T/C X-Bracing
h T/O X-Bracing
0.0
3.0
(Tu + C'u) cos / V f
0.0
h
0.0 1.0 2.0 3.0 4.0
0 50 100 150 200 250 300
KL/r (Fy = 350 MPa)
< 2 S(0.2 s) IE W
S(Ta) Mv IE W 3 Ro Rd
V=
Ro Rd
> V (2.0 s)
1.0
0.8 Vancouver
Site Type C
Ro Rd = 1.95
0.6
S, V/W
UHS Sa
0.4 S Mv
V/W
0.2
0.0
0.0 1.0 2.0 3.0 4.0
T (s)
6.0
T = 0.09 hn 0.40
0.30
4.0
T (s)
V/W
Vancouver
0.20 Site Type C
R oR d = 1.95
2.0
0.10
Ta = 0.025 hn
0.00
0.0
0.0 1.0 2.0 3.0 4.0
0 20 40 60 80 100 T (s)
hn (m)
Determiner : Vd = Ve IE/(RoRd)
Poteaux et poutres :
Employer les forces anticipes les plus dfavorables dans les
diagonales + effet des charges de gravit
S16-09
1.0 1.0
Cu (S16-01, n = 1.34)
Cu / AgF y
P / AF 0.0 0.6
1.0 CU 0.2
-6 -4 -2 0 2 4 6 0.0
/ y 0.0 0.5 1.0 1.5 2.0 2.5
1.0
C'u / AgF y (Ductility = 1.0)
0.8
Cu (S16-01, n = 1.34)
1.0 0.6
0.5 0.4
0.2
P / AF 0.0
0.0
0.5 C'U 0.0 0.5 1.0 1.5 2.0 2.5
1.0
C'u / AgFy (Ductily = 3.0)
1.0 CU
0.8 Cu (S16-01, n = 1.34)
-6 -4 -2 C'u (mean)
0 2 4 6
/ y 0.6
0.4
0.4
Rsistance post-flambement 0.2
anticipe de grandes 0.0
dformations ( = 3.0 - 5.0) : 0.0 0.5 1.0
1.5 2.0 2.5
W W W W W W W W W
F3 F3 F3
Au flambement Post-flambement
des diagonales des diagonales
Tu, i+1
C'u,i+1
FL FR FL + FR = (Tu, i+1 + C'u,i+1 + Tu, i + C'u,i) cos
FL / FR selon la gomtrie
C'u,i Tu, i
Tu, i+1
C'u,i+1
FL FR
FL < FR Cf Cf Cf = FR + (Tu, i+1 - C'u,i) cos
Tu, i C'u,i
w
Contreventement en chevron
avec poutres fortes : Tu C'u
Note: dans les btiments de
4 tages et moins, on peut
nutilliser que 0.6 Tu mais la C'u
poutre doit tre de classe 1. VL Tu VR
Charges latrales
requises
pour initier
le flambement
des diagonales
1.2 Cu
Sabelli (2003)
Tr (Ry / ) > Tf
Groupe Canam
(2003)
8.6 m
= 48.5 deg.
X en T/S : Tf = 489 kN
HSS ASTM A500 gr. C
Fy = 345 MPa
3 critres :
Tr = A Fy > Tf
KL/r < 200 , avec K = 0.5 et L = Lc-c - 500 mm 11 000 mm
bo/t < 330/Fy0.5 si KL/r < 100
425/Fy0.5 si KL/r = 200
interpolation si 100 < KL/r < 200
R. Tremblay, cole Polytechnique de Montral 104
355
117
-61 -239
- 416 -355
23.4 kN/m
Cu Cu
Tu Tu
1065 kN
R. Tremblay, cole Polytechnique de Montral 106
Tablier 38 mm Dalle 76 + 65 mm
F
12 000
D
8 000
C
12 000
A
9 @ 6 000 = 54 000 9 @ 6 000 = 54 000
1 13 1 13
Toit - lvation 11 800 Planchers - lvations 4 200 & 8 000
3 800
Acier : ASTM A992, Fy = 345 MPa (W)
ASTM A500, Fy = 345 MPa (HSS)
3 800
C D
C D
Mv = 1.0 (Ta < 1.0 s)
IE = 1.0 (difice bureaux: catgorie de risque normale)
=> V = 1470 kN
Poteaux :
Level Cf Shape A KL/r b/t Cr Tu Cu C'u
(kN) (mm2) (kN) (kN (kN) (kN)
3 179 89x89x6.4 1870 119 11.0 193 860 273 172
2 446 127x127x6.4 2780 81.3 17.5 477 1279 714 256
1 614 140x140x7.9 3770 76 14.9 695 1734 1054 347
-369
117
74
553
1054 1734 2468 < 2867 347 1734 2468 < 3138
1831
-2147
1263
-1907
-358
117
74
735 273 835 172
445 -464 445 238 -761 238
-980
739
542
1279 714 1279 256
334 -556 334 228 -1076 228
1054 1734 2468 < 2867 347 1734 2468 < 3138
1777
-2094
1251
-1897
1734 1054 1734 347
1535 933 1535 307
735 273
CD = 90 [1.35 + 2(4.6)] = 950 kN
445 -464 445
1279 714
334 -556 334
ATL = 180 m2
1054 1734
1777
-2094
RTL = 0.533
1734 1054
1535 933 CL = 0.533 (180) 2.4 = 230 kN
2583 2583
Cf = 950 + 2094 + 0.25(223)
+ 0.5(230)
= 3215 kN
R. Tremblay, cole Polytechnique de Montral 116
Zy = 990x103 mm3
Mpy = 342 kN-m
Mry = 307 kN-m (dversement empch)
Cey = 11 233 kN
1y = 0.6 ( = 0, on suppose rotule la base)
U1y = 0.6 / (1 - 3215/11 233) = 0.84
= 0.85
R. Tremblay, cole Polytechnique de Montral 117
-315
-358
117
74
- (1279 + 256) cos 2 ]
735 273 835 172
445 -464 445 238 -761 238
-980
739
542
1279 714 1279 256
334 -556 334 228 -1076 228
-2094
1251
-1897
- (1309 + 802) cos 2 ]
1734 1054 1734 347
1535 933 1535 307
835 172
238 -761 238
Tu & Cu dans les 256 1279
-980
542
-1897
1734 347
1535 307
2058 2058
8000
R. Tremblay, cole Polytechnique de Montral 120
Zx = 1280x103 mm3
Mrx = 397 kN-m (on suppose un support continu)
Cex = 7865 kN
1x = 1.0 (charge uniformment distribue)
U1x = 1.0 / (1 1076/7865) = 1.16
Rsistance de la membrure :
9m
26.4 m
Perimeter MRF
Perimeter MRF
6 @ 9 m = 54 m
45.6 m
Center of Mass
X = 31.5 m
Y = 18.8 m
X 18 m 18 m X
9m
Perimeter Wall 27.6 m
1
254.4 m
7 @ 9 m = 63 m
A H Floor Area and Perimeter Wall
Typical Floor Structure
b)
Level 5
4
Column
4 @ 4.0 m
3 Splice
= 16.0 m
2
1.2 m
Level 1
4.5 m
H
7
Y2 X
2
A
Floors Floors
Partitions 1.0 Occupancy (office) 3.83
Floor finish 0.2
Concrete slab and steel deck 2.5
Floor framing 0.4
Mechanical and ceiling 0.5
4.6
Exterior walls
Cladding (on the vertical face) 1.5 -
T Sa(T) S(T)
(s) (g) (g)
0.2 0.94 1.034
0.5 0.64 0.749
1.0 0.33 0.386
2.0 0.17 0.199
0.3811.0 W
V 0.0977 W 6428kN
3.0 1.3
1Force Ft is included.
0.007 FX
0.007 FX
5.4 FX CR 1.7 FX CR
FX
FX
22.5 m
18.8 m
CM
X X
0.236 FX 0.236 FX
b)
Y Y
0.174 FX 0.174 FX 0.174 FX = 0.25 FX - (0.75 x 9.1 FX ) / (2 x 45)
0.326 FX = 0.25 FX + (0.75 x 9.1 FX ) / (2 x 45)
+/- 0.036 FX = 0 +/- (0.25 x 9.1 FX ) / 63
0.036 FX
0.036 FX
CR CR F
FX X
22.5 m
18.8 m
CM 9.1 FX
5.4 F X X X
0.326 FX 0.326 FX
c)
Y Y
0.053 FY 0.053 FY 0.053 FY 0.053 FY
+/- 0.053 FY = 0 +/- (0.75 x 6.3 FY ) / (2 x 45)
0.525 FY = 0.5 FY + (0.25 x 6.3 FY ) / 63
0.475 FY = 0.5 FY - (0.25 x 6.3 FY ) / 63
0.475 FY
0.525 FY
0.525 FY
0.475 FY
FY FY
CR CR
CM 6.3 FY CM
6.3 FY
X X
0.053 FY 0.053 FY 0.053 FY 0.053 FY
R. Tremblay, cole Polytechnique de Montral 127
Storey Storey B C B C
Shear Shear
Level
-5 -4 W840x193 Braces W840x193 Braces
4 0 8 08
753 50 4 610 40 5
W150x37 W150x37
2 -8 4 -7 W1000x272 W1000x272
1318 8 1067 14
88 2 71
W310x158
W360x162
W310x158
W310x143
-1 -1 2
2229 76 57 1805 76 27 Design
W360x287
W360x287
W360x262
W360x262
5 6 W310x67 W250x58
1 12 6
W920x449 W920x420
[kN] [kN] 1
W250x89 W200x86
CBF (Line 2) CBF (Line 7)
3D Static
Y
CBF (typ) 300 (typ.) Analysis
0
7
Level
W920x201 Braces W840x193 Braces
5
Perimeter MRF
Perimeter MRF
6 @ 9 m = 54 m
W200x42 W150x37
W1000x272 W1000x272
W310x158
W360x162
W310x158
W310x143
4
W250x58 W250x58
W1000x321 W1000x272
3
W200x71 W250x58
X W920x420 W1000x314
2
W360x314
W360x287
W360x347
W360x262
W200x86 W310x67
See W920x491 W920x449
1
1
Elevation
W360 x101 W250x89
7 @ 9 m = 63 m
A H
Typical Floor Structure
R. Tremblay, cole Polytechnique de Montral 128
{
4 -5 -7 -1
798 53 34 115 77 7 15 10 0
-9 -1 -2
1420 0 49 227 2 52 42 28 8
95 15 U2
-1 -1
1853 40 23 + 293 19
6 96 + 66 44 x1.00
-4
12 9
4
- -2
2188 6 4 146 345 1 31 91
-6
14 4 23 61 1
- -2
2393 92 169 403 5 85 117
-8
16 2 28 83 3
F T (e = -5.4 m) N
[kN]
C G
c)
B F
11
9k
N
-5
4 20
20
-5
4 12 (D+
19 40 k 0. 5
23
-3
1 1 -1
23 44 6 k N L +0
-1 -3 kN N ( (F) .25
-5 -1 Lw (N T) S)
19 4 -5
4 19 )
-1 =
60
-6 -1 21
10 6 -6
6 10
-1
-1 -1
12 13 13 12
-1 -1
/- e /- e
0 + ng 0 + ng
30 H i 30 Hi
21
60
4000
-
+/
00
39 41.6
O
B C B C
Storey Storey
Shear Shear Vx, E+T Vx,max
991 1321 788 1050
[kN] [kN]
Tu + C u Tu + Cu
Poteau au niveau 3:
Cf = 3733 kN
KL = 4000 mm
Section = W360x162 (Fy = 345 MPa)
(KL/r)y = 42.2
Cry = 5550 kN
Cey = 22 825 kN
U1y = 1.196 (1y = 1.0)
Mry = 472 kN-m
{
Tu + C u
B C F G
4.5 m 4.5 m 4.5 m 4.5 m
2419 2419
1457 3504 1683 1457 3504 1683
[KN] [KN]
Tu + Cu
B C F G
4.5 m 4.5 m 4.5 m 4.5 m
Mf 4366 kN-m
(KL/r)x = 21.9
Crx = 12400 kN
Cex = 168 800 kN
U1x = 1.015 (1y = 1.0)
Mrx = 4906 kN-m
e Segment
Type D Rd = 4.0 ductile
Ro = 1.5
Plastification
des segments L
ductiles
en flexion e
ou
en cisaillement
Filiatrault et al.
V
Rotule
(typ.)
L L V=2M/e
e Symtrique
Pf 0 dans segment
p = p L/e
ductile
Assemblages
Assemblage
poutres-poteaux
rigide (typ.) rotuls
Porte des poutres
plus courte
Bon dgagement
L L
2.0
1.0
V / Vy
0.0
-1.0
-2.0
-12.0 -8.0 -4.0 0.0 4.0 8.0 12.0
y
P. Bolduc, cole Polytechnique 2002
Vancouver, BC (RJC)
Qubec, QC (1999)
Montreal, QC (Canam)
+ article 20
Chapitre 20 Plaque
d'acier
(Calcul lastique)
Treillis quivalent &
modle avec bielles
Angle dinclinaison
Rigidit minimum pour
les poteaux
Ancrage des panneaux au Diagonales Plaques Bielles
hs
Poutres de classe 1 ou 2
hs
Poteaux de classe 1
Assemblages des plaques L
pour permettre la L L
Plaques
introduites dans
un cadre
noeuds rigides
Plastification de
lme et rotation
plastique dans
les poutres et
poteaux
Universit
de lAlberta
CNBC
2010
R. Tremblay, cole Polytechnique de Montral 148