Professional Documents
Culture Documents
CLINICAL SCENE
Central obesity
Impaired fibrinolysis
Pro coagulant
Hyperuricaemia
Microalbuminuria
WHO and ATP III have slightly different definitions for the Metabolic syndrome,
but it seems like the WHO criteria may identify a greater number of obese
adults at risk for CVD. International Journal of Obesity (2005) 29, 668-674 To
make definition and screening of patients with the Metabolic syndrome easier,
the International Diabetes Federation has come up with a slight variation,
including the fasting blood sugar as a satisfactory measure (thus incorporating
the ATP III recommendations) Download the latest definition of Metabolic
syndrome (IDF consensus statement. PDF format)
Normally, during an overnight fast the liver is the major contributor to plasma
glucose through glycogenolysis and gluconeogenesis. This basal hepatic glucose
production is increased in type 2 diabetics due to incomplete suppression of
endogenous glucose production by the liver. Metabolism. 1988 Jan;37(1):15-21
This is despite the fasting hyperinsulinaemia, reflecting the insulin-resistance
to carbohydrate metabolism in the liver. This increased HGP is predominantly
due to gluconeogenesis (proved by deuterated water and MRI).
So what causes this insulin resistance in the liver? Hepatic fatty infiltration has
been closely correlated to hepatic insulin resistance, independent of general
obesity. J Biol Chem. 2000 Mar 24;275(12):8456-60. Ectopic fat storage
hypothesis assumes that overwhelming of the adipocyte storage space diverts
triglycerides to the liver (and muscle) producing steatohepatitis resulting in
resistance to insulin action at this site. Ann N Y Acad Sci. 2002 Jun;967:363-
78. In this context, it is important to note that insulin is unable to suppress
hepatic glucose production in mice lacking the insulin receptor in the liver. Mol
Cell. 2000 Jul;6(1):87-97.
Interestingly people with IGT have normal HGP and normal fasting glucose
despite marked fasting hyperinsulinaemia. This is probably due to the high post
absorptive plasma insulin levels being sufficient to overcome the hepatic insulin
resistance thus maintaining the basal HGP normal. The high post absorptive
plasma insulin levels in this setting is attributed to the defective first phase
insulin response resulting in hyperglycemia which stimulates a higher than
usual second phase response of insulin secretion.
Yet, muscle insulin receptors are not crucial to facilitate muscle uptake of
glucose, as hyperglycaemia itself can produce glucose uptake in muscles. In
keeping with this, rats with tissue specific deletion of the muscle insulin
receptor have normal glucose and insulin concentrations. Mol Cell. 1998
Nov;2(5):559-69. Note that the number of insulin receptors and transporters
as GLUT4 and the affinity of insulin for receptors in muscle are mostly normal
despite insulin resistance. Instead multiple intracellular signalling defects have
been identified as the cause of defective insulin action at the muscular level,
namely:
Skeletal muscles, like adipose tissue, also possess lipoprotein lipase, the
activity of which is normally suppressed by insulin. Metabolism. 1991
Feb;40(2):214-6. In insulin resistance, this activity is increased which could
contribute to the increased muscle triglyceride content, Metabolism. 1995
Jun;44(6):786-90. with resultant muscle insulin resistance. In fact, skeletal
muscle insulin sensitivity correlates closely with intramyocellular fat.
Diabetologia. 2001 Jul;44(7):824-33.
All patients by the time they reach IGT have some degree of insulin secretory
defect, since the pancreas has a huge reserve and hence coping ability
normally. Although there is a relative deficiency initially, by the stage when
fasting glucose rises above about 11.1 mmol/L (200 mg/dl) the deficiency of
insulin is in absolute terms. It makes sense to assume that the pancreatic beta
cell failure is secondary to insulin resistance of a prolonged duration, with
higher insulin resistance probably producing earlier failure in a susceptible
individual. Physiol Rev. 1995 Jul;75(3):473-86 The demonstration of offsprings
of type 2 diabetics being insulin resistant and hyperinsulinaemic is in keeping
with this. Ann Intern Med. 1990 Dec 15;113(12):909-15. But in recent times a
new assumption has been proposed, where the beta cell failure is thought to be
the primary genetic defect, and the resulting hyperglycaemia contributing to
glucotoxicity and later, insulin resistance. Endocr Rev. 1998 Aug;19(4):491-503.
Demonstration of first degree relatives of type 2 diabetics with normal glucose
tolerance but reduced insulin responses in the absence of insulin resistance
seems to be the strongest argument for this hypothesis. Metabolism. 2000
Oct;49(10):1318-25. Also, a 37% deficit in early insulin response has been
demonstrated in pre-diabetic subjects compared to non-diabetic subjects.
Diabetes Care. 2003 Mar;26(3):868-74. HOMA assessment of beta cell
function undertaken in the UKPDS study supports this by showing that beta
cell function is already reduced by 50% at the time of diagnosis of type 2
diabetic state. Diabetes. 1995 Nov;44(11):1249-58. The relentless progression
despite modalities to target insulin resistance (metformin) further lends
credence to this theory of a primary beta cell pathology. The process by which a
pancreatic dysfunction as the primary pathology could lead to insulin
resistance as a secondary event is difficult to explain. I would like to postulate
that a relative deficiency of insulin could upset the hepato-portal insulin to
glucagon ratio which might impact on fatty acid release in the periphery due to
excessive glucagon action. The increased fatty acid release could result in
hepatic steatosis and increased myocellular lipid content with development of
insulin resistance? (personal view). While much is known about the various
factors determining insulin resistance, much less is known about factors
determining insulin secretory ability or insulin secretory failure, which probably
stems from the fact that the hyperglycaemic clamp allows a reasonably accurate
measurement of insulin sensitivity while no such gold standard exists to
measure insulin secretory ability.
The primary defect in the beta cell could involve multiple aspects of insulin
synthesis and secretion which might under genetic control. Normally, insulin
secretion involves recognition of hyperglycaemia by the pancreas (glucose
sensing), glucose metabolism in the pancreatic cells, depolarisation of the beta
cell plasma membrane (closure of potassium channels), movement of preformed
secretory granules to the plasma membrane (involving microtubules and
microfilaments), followed by release of its contents (insulin, proinsulin, C
peptide) through fusion of the membranes (calcium influx). One or more of
these steps can be defective in a particular individual depending on the genetic
defect. Genetic defects have been described for the glucokinase gene, glucose
transporter 2 (GLUT-2), the insulin gene, the sulphonylurea receptor and the
mitochondrial genome. Diabetologia. 1996 Apr;39(4):375-82. Genetic defects
causing defective insulin action have also been identified including those for
GLUT-4, IRS-1. hexokinase II, FABP etc. While genetic analysis can be effective
in identifying defective genes in monogenic forms of diabetes, the mystery of
polygenic diabetes (type 2) still remains unraveled due to the heterogeneity of
the genotypes and the variable phenotypes in different populations.
Identification of a candidate gene(s) for type 2 diabetes by association would
then have to be the demonstrated to have a pathogenic role by quantitatively
relating it's malfunction to the insulin resistance or insulin deficiency in vivo.
Yet, it still remains unclear as to whether an insulin secretory defect or insulin
resistance contributes predominantly to the pathogenesis of type 2 diabetes.
In insulin resistant states as type 2 diabetes mellitus, the fat cells are resistant
to insulin, both for glucose uptake and suppression of lipolysis. J Clin
Endocrinol Metab. 1985 Nov;61(5):807-11 The latter defect results in increased
lipolysis in adipose tissue with chronically elevated free fatty acids (FFAs) which
in turn impairs insulin secretion, decreases glucose uptake in muscles, J Clin
Invest. 1983 Nov;72(5):1737-47. stimulates hepatic gluconeogenesis, increases
hepatic VLDL production and induces hepatic and muscular insulin
resistance. J Biol Chem. 2000 Mar 24;275(12):8456-60. Thus the adipocyte
defect might be more crucial in the pathogenesis of insulin resistance? Read
further about the role of adipose tissue........Insulin and glucose normally
stimulates adipocyte lipoprotein lipase activity while reducing muscle
lipoprotein lipase activity, thus directing fatty acids towards adipose tissue
rather than muscles. In obese patients, activation of lipoprotein lipase in
adipose tissue is delayed while LPL activity in muscle is increased, Proc Natl
Acad Sci U S A. 2001 Jun 19;98(13):7522-7. resulting in increased lipid
accumulation in muscles (increased intramyocellular lipid), with development of
the ectopic fat storage syndrome. The role of fatty acid transporter protein
(CD36) in regulation of fatty acid uptake in tissues, with implications on
development of insulin resistance in states of deficiency Lancet. 2001 Mar
3;357(9257):686-7 remains to be clarified.
Procoagulant factors:
Platelets:
Fibrinogen levels are raised in diabetes mellitus. Levels are particularly raised
due to chronic hypersecretion in those with prolonged poor metabolic control.
Hence improved diabetic control should theoretically decrease fibrinogen levels
and improve the coagulant status.
PAI-1:
Glycated LDL:
Treatment options
The knowledge of the multiple sites of insulin resistance as well as the multiple
abnormalities associated with insulin resistance ( low HDL, high triglycerides,
hypertension, obesity, increased platelet aggregation, increased procoagulant
tendency) with or without hyperglycaemia, should prompt a multi-pronged
approach to treating this multi-faceted disease.
Exercise
Both aerobic and resistance training exercises improve insulin sensitivity, but
the beneficial effects of exercise tend to decrease after a few days of inactivity.
Studies have shown that physical activity N Engl J Med. 1991 Jul 18;325(3):147-
52 and fitness levels Ann Intern Med. 1999 Jan 19;130(2):89-96 are inversely
associated with incidence of type 2 diabetes independent of BMI. So, how does
exercise produce an improvement in insulin resistance? Regular exercise may
increase translocation of GLUT-4 glucose transporters in skeletal muscle cells
partly related to the increased skeletal muscle blood flow J Clin Endocrinol
Metab. 1995 Aug;80(8):2437-46. and AMPK (5'adenosine monophosphate
activated protein kinase) activation Diabetes. 1999 Aug;48(8):1667-71. thus
improving glucose uptake. The ability of insulin to increase skeletal muscle
blood flow seems to be improved with exercise in normals and insulin resistant
subjects. Diabetes. 1995 Sep;44(9):1010-20 , and the increased blood flow
may improve local availability of insulin as well. Exercise has been associated
with increased release of local bradykinin which may have stimulatory effects
on glucose uptake. Diabetes. 1998 Apr;47(4):550-8 Exercise without weight
loss significantly reduces visceral fat compared to controls. Exercise-induced
weight loss reduces total fat to a greater extent than diet induced weight loss.
Metformin:
Metformin has been shown to improve muscle insulin sensitivity measured with
the euglycaemic insulin clamp in type 2 diabetics. Metformin also improves
insulin sensitivity and normalises glycogen synthesis in the muscle in insulin
resistant normoglycaemic first degree relatives of individuals with type 2
diabetes mellitus. Metformin may activate AMP kinase leading to enhanced
basal and insulin stimulated glucose transport in muscle
Thiazolidinediones:
Rosiglitazone and Pioglitazone are the major players in this group at present.
Thiazolidinediones improve insulin sensitivity in both liver and muscle. They
(rosiglitazone and pioglitazone) augment insulin stimulated muscle glucose
uptake and enhance basal and insulin mediated suppression of HGP.
Improvement in glycaemia may contribute to improved beta cell function.
TRIPOD study involving 235 women with a history of GDM (two third with IGT),
where the women were treated with troglitazone for 30 months, the drug did
better than placebo (12.3% per year converting from IGT to T2DM in the placebo
group as opposed to 5.4% in the troglitazone group; p<0.001) Diabetes Metab.
2003 Nov;29(5):547-53. The PIPOD study using pioglitazone will be looking at
similar benefits.
Sulphonylureas:
Among the sulphonylureas, the third generation sulphonylurea (Glimiperide)
seems to have a more favourable cardiovascular profile. Horm Metab Res. 1996
Sep;28(9):496-507. Glimiperide seems to improve glycaemia to similar levels as
the second generation sulphonylureas despite lower insulinotropic activity.
Diabetes Res Clin Pract. 1995 Aug;28 Suppl:S115-37. This is thought to imply
extra-pancreatic effects of Glimiperide through favouring peripheral glucose
uptake as well as by augmenting first phase insulin secretion.
Pharmacotherapy. 2004 May;24(5):606-20.
The term Glucotoxicity has been coined to explain the beta cell failure as well as
peripheral insulin resistance in type 2 diabetes. Sulphonylureas may partly
exert their beneficial effect through improvement of glucotoxicity. Glucotoxicity
implies chronic elevation of plasma glucose levels inducing insulin resistance
and impairing beta cell function by local toxicity. High levels of glucose down-
regulates the glucose transport system in the muscle while up-regulating
glucose-6- phosphatase in the liver with increased hepatic glucose production,
both contributing to insulin resistance at the respective sites. An ongoing study
with Nateglinide should address the issue of postprandial glucose reduction
and improvement in insulin resistance effects. The fact that glycaemic control
did not produce statistically significant improvement in Cardiovascular
outcomes in the UKPDS suggests that tackling the glycaemic abnormality is
probably not the whole answer to insulin resistance management.
ACE Inhibitors:
ACE Inhibitors improve muscle blood flow and increase muscle glucose uptake
(increase GLUT4 activity). FEBS Lett. 2004 Oct 22;576(3):492-7. They suppress
brain sympathetic activity thus improving insulin sensitivity. They may have an
effect on the tissue ACE demonstrated in pancreatic beta cells. Increasing the
bradykinin and prostaglandins in the muscle has been shown to improve
insulin sensitivity of muscle and this could be a possible mechanism. Diabetes.
1998 Apr;47(4):550-8 Counteracting the deleterious effects of Angiotensin II
in the adipose tissue, and recruiting new adipocytes by facilitating adipocyte
differentiation could be yet another mechanism of action of ACE inhibitors.
Diabetes Metab. 2004 Dec;30(6):498-505.
The lipotoxicity hypothesis assumes the latter view. Excess carbohydrates are
stored as glycogen normally. When glycogen stores are replete, further fate of
the carbohydrates is entry into the lipogenic pathway (conversion to acetyl coA
and then malonyl CoA). Malonyl coA inhibits fatty oxidation (lipolysis) by beta-
oxidation, through inhibition of the CPT-1 (carnitine palmitoyl transferase 1)
enzyme, while favouring fat deposition ( lipogenesis), while the cell which is
insulin sensitive continues to utilize glucose for its energy needs. The proposed
disadvantage of this scenario is that the fat that does not undergo beta
oxidation here, can be metabolised by other pathways leading to toxic products
facilitating apoptosis and lipotoxicity. Annu Rev Med. 2002;53:319-36.
Development of insulin resistance (to the uptake of glucose into cells) results in
diversion of the stored triglycerides into the preferred beta oxidation pathway
avoiding generation of toxic substances including nitric oxide and ceramide.
Trends Endocrinol Metab. 2003 Nov;14(9):398-403. But if this was to be as
simplistic as it sounds, insulin resistance would have ultimately produced total
lipolysis thus limiting the fat accumulation and restoring insulin sensitivity! It
is important to realise that it is postulated that insulin resistance in this
context may be selective for glucose uptake and not for lipogenesis. In other
words, the cell remains sensitive to the lipogenic action of insulin through
mechanisms as SREBP1c up regulation, Endocr Rev. 2002 Apr;23(2):201-29.
facilitating continued deposition of fat as long as excess dietary supply of
carbohydrates or calories is maintained.