Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Journalof
International Journal of Fatigue 28 (2006) 15901602
Fatigue
www.elsevier.com/locate/ijfatigue
a
SUPMECA/LISMMA-Paris, School of Mechanical and Manufacturing Engineering, 3 rue Fernand Hainaut, 93407 Saint Ouen Cedex, France
b
ITMA-CNAM, Bathias Research Laboratory, School of Mechanical Engineering, 2 rue Conte 75003, Paris, France
Received 30 June 2004; received in revised form 2 September 2005; accepted 15 September 2005
Available online 18 April 2006
Abstract
In modern technology, analysis of fatigue behaviour of engineering components is obligatory to develop engines and mechanical parts
to improve the performance and to increase lifetime up to 109 cycles. On the other hand, the estimations and analysis of the mechanism
of fatigue failure must be known in detail for steel industry to develop high quality steels.
In this research, dierent alloys, failed under high frequency fatigue conditions, used in the automotive industry, were studied: steels,
heat treated at dierent conditions, cast iron and cast aluminium with dierent tensile strength ranging from 220 to 2350 MPa. These
alloys were tested at very high cyclegigacycle-fatigue (VHCF, >107), using a piezoelectric fatigue system (20 kHz) under tensioncom-
pression conditions with a stress ratio of R = 1. The central part of each specimen was cooled by compressed air to keep the temper-
ature constant at room temperature. Fatigue failure values were usually located between 107 and 1010 cycles. Eects of defect types on
failure mechanism in very high cycle fatigue range are discussed here in detail with fracture surface analysis by using Scanning Electron
Microscopy (SEM).
2006 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
Keywords: Failure mechanism; Very high cycle fatigue; (VHCF); Metallic alloys
0142-1123/$ - see front matter 2006 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
doi:10.1016/j.ijfatigue.2005.09.019
E. Bayraktar et al. / International Journal of Fatigue 28 (2006) 15901602 1591
Table 1
Chemical composition of materials (wt%)
Steel grade C Mn P S Si Al Fe Mg Ni Cr Cu Mo V
42CrMo4 0.428 0.827 0.012 0.024 0.254 0.173 1.026 0.224
D38MSV5S ferriteperlite 0.384 1.23 0.012 0.064 5.67 0.025 0.063 0.063 0.018 0.089
Perlitic steel xC70 0.6695 0.568 0.011 0.0625 0.158 <0.002 0.127 0.034
52100 1.03 0.339 0.012 0.008 0.242 0.147 1.461 0.032
Cast iron GS51 3.65 0.5 2.49 0.04 0.7
Cast aluminium AS5 0.32 5.3 Sold 0.57 0.36 3.15
Table 2
Mechanical properties of materials
Steel grade E (GPa) q (kg/m3) r0.2 (MPa) UTS (MPa) A (%) HVN (30) rD at 107 rD at 109
42CrMo4-L (long.) 205 7870 1460 1535 6 465 760 740
42CrMo4-T (trans.) 210 7850 1482 1508 3 469 525 500
AISI 52100 210 7860 2358 704 880 860
D38MSV5S 210 7850 608 878 20 246 380 314
Perlitic steel XC70 210 7850 513 927 8.12 305 376 350
Cast iron GS51 169 7100 460 795 9 265 250 240
Aluminium AS5 72 2700 182 222 1 99 75 60
1592 E. Bayraktar et al. / International Journal of Fatigue 28 (2006) 15901602
1000 1200
42CrMo4, UTS=1500 52100
Mpa
1000
800
800
Stress (MPa)
Stress (Mpa)
600
600
400
400
NF100C6-I, 20 kHz, R = -1
NF100C6-I, 30 kHz, R = -1
200 Transversal specimens SUJ2, 20 kHz, R = -1
200 30 Hz
Logitudinal specimens
NF100C6-II, 20 kHz, R = -1
0 0
1,E+03 1,E+05 1,E+07 1,E+09 1,E+11 1,E+04 1,E+06 1,E+08 1,E+10 1,E+12
Cycles (Nf) Cycles (Nf)
(a) Steel: 42CrMo4-T and L (b) Steel: 52100
600 600
D38MSV5 30 Hz, R=-1, RENAULT Perlitic steel 20 kHz, R = -1
20 kHz, R=-1, ITMA-CNAM (XC70) 30 Hz
500 500
Stress (Mpa)
Stress (Mpa)
400 400
300 300
200 200
1,E+03 1,E+05 1,E+07 1,E+09 1,E+11 1,E+03 1,E+05 1,E+07 1,E+09 1,E+11
Cycles (Nf) Cycles (Nf)
(c) Steel: D38MSV5 (d) Steel: Perlitic (XC70)
375 200
20 kHz, R = -1 Aluminium AS5 20 kHz, R = -1
Cast iron (GS51)
30 kHz, R = -1 30 kHz, R = -1
35 Hz
300 30 Hz
150
Stress (MPa)
Stress (MPa)
225
100
150
50
75
same specimen
0 0
1,E+03 1,E+06 1,E+09 1,E+12 1,E+04 1,E+06 1,E+08 1,E+10 1,E+12
Cycles (Nf)
Cycles (Nf) Changing of failure
mechanism
(e) Castiron (f) Castaluminium
Fig. 1. Very high cycle fatigue test results at the stress ratio of R = 1 and at the frequency of 20 kHz at room temperature for the dierent materials.
is found between 107 and 1010 cycles and two dierent fati- is seen very well from this picture (Fig. 1f) that there is a
gue ranges, low cycle fatigue (up to 106 cycle) and very high passage and/or a strict zone between 106 and 107 cycles
cycle fatigue (beyond 108 cycle) gave two dierent slopes. It indicate the changing in the failure mechanism. It means
E. Bayraktar et al. / International Journal of Fatigue 28 (2006) 15901602 1593
3.2. Microstructure
Fig. 3a. Fracture surfaces due to non-metallic inclusions in microstructure of 42CrMo4-L (R = 1, 20 kHz).
initiated from under jacket or near the surface gave mainly ratio or shape factors (dlength/dwidth) for dierent specimens
at and smooth facets in the given test conditions. were given in Table 3. As a result, the value found for
Studies of Murakami et al. [3,4] showed that specimens 42CrMo4-T is higher than that of 42CrMo4-L and AISI
have a particular fracture surface morphology around the 52100. Naturally, these values are the mean values because
non-metallic inclusions at the fracture origin named they vary from specimen to specimen. Consequently, this
ODA (optically dark area), of which the size increases with seems to be strong evidence that fatigue strength level
increasing fatigue life; larger than twice of the size of the and dispersion in the SN curves of the materials depend
original inclusion at the fracture origin in the range of on the aspect ratio.
Nf P 108. So, the calculated fatigue limit, rw, values obtained by
p
They estimated the fatigue limit of specimen, rw, by area parameter model [3] are found to be 530 and
defect area and hardness parameters for evaluating the 790 MPa for the grades of 42CrMo4-L and AISI 52100,
inuence of inclusions. respectively. They were underestimated and the calculated
The number of cycle was not specied in the prediction values are very dierent regarding to the experimental
of the fatigue limit in the Murakami equations. They con- results given in Fig. 1 and Table 2. This equation cannot
sidered that the lifetime is innite in their formulation. In be used for example for the grade of 42CrMo4-T due to
fact, there must a relation between these parameters and the shape of the inclusions regarding to 42CrMo4-L
the cycles to failure, Nf. and p52100.
So, the predicted fatigue limit calculated by
a the area parameter model, which were proposed for the
1:56HV 120 1 R
rw p 1 internal defects and inclusions, is not always valid. The
area1=6 2
other parameters discussed here, such as aspect ratio,
where rw is the fatigue endurance limit (MPa), R is the which is an important parameter should be taken into con-
stress ratio and a = 0.226 + Hv 104. sideration in the fatigue limit prediction equations. The
In our study, many of the inclusions were not circles but hardness value used in this equation is not primary
mainly of dierent shapes. So, the form of the inclusion parameter.
must be taken into account. In case of 42CrMo4-T, the Recently, Paris has estimated crack growth life from the
inclusions are acicular and for the 42CrMo4-L and AISI da/dN curve in the gigacycle range with a mathematical
52100 the forms of the inclusions are generally globular model making evident that the initiation from an inclusion
or spherical but in deformed shapes. The measured aspect or other defect itself must be close to the total life [2].
E. Bayraktar et al. / International Journal of Fatigue 28 (2006) 15901602 1595
Fig. 3b. Fracture surfaces due to non-metallic inclusions in microstructure of 42CrMo4-T (R = 1, 20 kHz).
Paris rstly explained the lifetime in the sh eyes from These equations show that the crack growth is not very
the crack initiation up to brittle fracture by the following signicant with sh eyes internal initiation of gigacycle fati-
equation: gue failure. Because, the cycle related to the crack propaga-
tion Np, in the sh eyes is of the order of 106 whereas the
pE2
N prop.in.fisheye 2 total lifetime, Ntotal is 109 cycles only and only where sh
2Dr2 eyes are observed. It means that the lifetime in the sh eyes
He showed also the crack growth life before the thresh- is too short. The value of Nint the cycle related to the crack
old corner by the following equation: growth before the threshold slope is also too short. Our
observations on the very huge experimental data showed
pE2 that, the time elapsed up to the rst appearance of a small
N int 3
12Dr2 crack only governs the total fatigue life of the specimen in
Or about gigacycle fatigue, about more than 99% of the total fatigue
life. This situation belong to the gigacycle is completely dif-
1 ferent from the conventional fatigue behaviour (shortcycle
N int N prop.in.fisheye 4
6 or megacycle fatigue up to Nf = 106).
1596 E. Bayraktar et al. / International Journal of Fatigue 28 (2006) 15901602
Fig. 3c. Fracture surfaces due to non-metallic inclusions in microstructure of AISI 52100 (R = 1, 20 kHz).
Fig. 4. Fracture surfaces due to porosities in microstructure in cast aluminium (R = 1, 20 kHz).
microstructural characteristics. Additionally, the high Mg In most cases, the fatigue crack initiated from a single
and Fe contents decrease fatigue life because their concen- site in the cast iron and cast aluminium specimens tested
tration increases in the inter-dendritic regions, which are in gigacycle range. The crack initiation sites located mainly
very susceptible for the crack initiation sites [8,9]. internal side and/or just under the surface and also surface
In case of aluminium, fatigue life can be improved by of the specimen depending on the defect density evidently
rening the dendrite particularly secondary dendrite arm related the volume of the specimen. However, two crack
spacing and the size of the silicon particles. On the other initiation sites were exceptionally observed in a few tested
hand, certain amount of porosity related to the oxide lms aluminium specimens (Fig. 4) with a high volume fraction
can be tolerated in casting depending on the application of porosity. For the size of the defect under the critical size
area. But, gas (spherical) and shrinkage (irregular shape) or threshold value, slip facets and eutectic de-bonding from
porosities are very detrimental to fatigue life. So, the fati- the matrix were observed in case of cast aluminium
gue life is related to a critical defect size in casting parts (R = 1, Nf = 9 107). In this case, crack initiation locates
and the Nf value is limited due to porosity size eect. at the eutectic particles and slip bands. These observations
1598 E. Bayraktar et al. / International Journal of Fatigue 28 (2006) 15901602
Fig. 5. Fracture surfaces due to porosities in microstructure of cast iron (R = 1, 20 kHz).
are in agreement with former results, which have been car- size of the porosity is considerable and beyond the thresh-
ried out in mega cycle [1,79,13,14]. old value. So, crack initiation occurred from this site. Fig. 6
Some of these crack initiation sites in cast iron were illustrates the role of the high density of the graphite found
observed from the ferrite regions around the graphite due in a part of the section of the specimen. Evidently, the
to a competition between harder spherical graphite and probability of nding a crack initiation around graphite
softer ferrite island. When the graphite density is higher at the surface is related to the density of the graphite for
regarding to porosity, overmatching conditions are favour- a given volume of the specimen [1317].
able for graphite because their stiness is very high and
they have very well coherency with matrix. Naturally, 3.3.3. Failure mechanism of materials due to nature of
crack initiated from one of these ferrite regions around microstructure
them. Fig. 5 shows a typical crack initiation from the micro Fatigue failure analyses were also carried out on the
porosity on a crystallographic plane (5c, Nf = 7 109). The fracture surfaces of the perlitic and ferrito perlitic steel
E. Bayraktar et al. / International Journal of Fatigue 28 (2006) 15901602 1599
Fig. 6. Fracture surfaces due to porosities in microstructure of cast iron (R = 1, 20 kHz).
(D38MSV5S) specimens tested in gigacycle range. They evidently dierent under the loading conditions and change
contain very small inclusions, which were dispersed homo- with test conditions, such as applied stress and stress ratio.
geneously in the matrix. Figs. 7a, 7b and 7d shows some of The crack initiation sites were then expected to be at the
the results of fatigue failures related to the nature of the interfaces of the ne perlite lamella. So, fatigue fracture
microstructure. was caused by gradual growth of microcrack initiated in
Microstructure of perlitic steel contains essentially ne- one of the ferrite phases on perlite lamella. Limited cleav-
dense perlite lamella (small distance between perlite age patterns on the fracture surface may be observed in
lamella). Crack initiation sites were found mostly internal the ferrite side, because undermatching conditions are
side of the specimen and they were not aected by the sur- favourable for crack initiation on it.
face roughness. It is also seen that the fracture surface is On the other hand, the microstructure of the D38MSV5S
mainly perpendicular to the perlite lamella. Certainly a is composed by ferrite (50%) and perlite (50%). Under the
mismatching condition appeared during the solicitation cyclic loading, a mismatching condition should be observed
between the two phases composed by hard Fe3C and soft between two dierent sites of the microstructure: ferrite and
ferrite phases, of which the mechanical behaviour will be perlite. Fig. 7c illustrates schematically this mismatching
Fig. 7a. Fracture surfaces due to inhomogeneous microstructure of perlitic steel, CX70 (R = 1, 20 kHz,).
1600 E. Bayraktar et al. / International Journal of Fatigue 28 (2006) 15901602
Fig. 7b. Fracture surfaces due to inhomogeneous microstructure of D38MSV5S steel, ferrite (%50), perlite (%50), (R = 1, 20 kHz).
condition. For a given stress level, two dierent deforma- to perlite phase. Evidently, overmatching conditions here
tion behaviours will be seen on the stressstrain curve dur- are mainly favourable for the perlite phase and fatigue
ing the loading. It means, globally the matrix (specimen) fracture is then caused by gradual growth of microcrack
will stay in the elastic range whereas ferrite phase will easily initiated in one of the ferrite phase. Finally, large frac-
undergone plastic deformation. As a result, one of the fer- ture patterns are observed on the perlitic side. Fig. 7d
rite grains will induce to fatigue crack initiation compared shows another example of a deformed ferrite grain, which
Globally: Matrix
x in elastic range
F P F x
Fig. 7c. Deformation behaviour of two dierent phases in the same microstructure due to mismatching.
E. Bayraktar et al. / International Journal of Fatigue 28 (2006) 15901602 1601
Fig. 7d. Fracture surfaces due to inhomogeneous microstructure of perlitic steel, deformation of ferrite grain, (R = 1, 20 kHz,).
introduced crack initiation. Microstructural observations, dense perlite lamella certainly in the ferrite side, which is a
EDS analysis and micro hardness measurements carried favourable site for crack initiation. Inclusions are not the
out in this point of the specimen proved the existence of fer- key parameters in this case.
rite grain, which induced the crack initiation in gigacycle
range. Acknowledgements
[9] Sadananda K, Vasudevan AK. Fatigue crack growth mechanisms in international conference on very high cycle fatigue, 4407, September
steels. Int J Fatigue 2003;25(911):899914. 2004, Kyoto, Japan.
[10] Mayer H, Ede C, Allison JE. Inuence of cyclic loads below [14] Bayraktar E, Marines GI, Bathias C. Failure mechanism of automo-
endurance limit or threshold stress intensity on fatigue damage in tive metallic alloys in very high cycle fatigue regime, in: Proceedings
cast aluminium alloy 319-T7. Int J Fatigue 2004;27(2):12941. on the VHCF-3, the 3rd international conference on very high cycle
[11] Mayer H. Fatigue crack growth and threshold measurements at very fatigue, 12431, September 2004, Kyoto, Japan.
high frequencies. Int Mater Rev 1999;44(1):136. [15] Murakami Y, Endo M. Eects of defects, inclusions and inhomoge-
[12] Bayraktar E, Garcia IM, Bin X, Vittori J-F, Bathias C. Study of the neities on fatigue strength. Int J Fatigue 1994;16(3):16382.
prediction of giga cycle fatigue of metallic alloys by statistical [16] Bayraktar E, Xue H, Bathias C. On the giga cycle fatigue behaviour
methods, in: 23rd fatigue conference SF2M, Paris, 2526 May, 8593, of (a2-Ti3Al and c-TiAl) alloy. Int J Fatigue 2004;26(2):126375.
2004. [17] Rao KTV, Siu SC, Ritchie RO. Failure mechanisms in SiC-ber
[13] Xue H, Bayraktar E, Bathias C. Very high cycle fatigue behaviour of reinforced 6061 aluminium alloy composites under monotonic and
(a2-Ti3Al and c-TiAl) Alloy, in: Proceedings on the VHCF-3, the 3rd cyclic loading. Metall Trans A 1993;24A(3):72134.