International Journal of Plant Breeding and Crop Science

Vol. 4(2), pp. 178-186, April, 2017. www.premierpublishers.org. ISSN: 2167-0449

IJPBCS

Research Article

Correlation and path coefficient analysis for yield and

yield components in some Ethiopian accessions of
Arabica Coffee
Lemi Beksisa1, Ashenafi Ayano2, Tadesse Benti3
1*,2,3
Ethiopian Institute of Agricultural Research, Jimma Agricultural Research Center, P.O.Box, 192, Jimma, Ethiopia.

Coffee (Coffea arabica L.) is an important beverage crop in the world and provides significant
contribution to Ethiopian economy. Sixty two coffee accessions with two standard checks, F-59 and
744 were evaluated from 2001 to 2012 cropping seasons at Agaro, Southwestern Ethiopia using 8x8
simple lattice design. The correlation coefficients and path coefficient analysis was estimated to
determine the association among yield and yield related traits and direct and indirect effects of yield
related traits on yield. Significant (P<0.05) to highly significant (P<0.01) differences among
accessions were obtained for all characters. The genotypic correlation coefficients were higher in
magnitude than the corresponding phenotypic correlation coefficients for most of the characters.
Number of primary branch, canopy diameter, number of main stem nodes and main stem diameter
showed positive and significant genotypic and phenotypic correlation with yield, while plant height,
internode length and length of first primary branch had positive but non-significant correlation.
Height up to first primary branch had negative and showed non-significant correlation with yield.
Path analysis showed that plant height (1.564) made the largest positive direct effects towards yield
followed by canopy diameter (1.555) and length of first primary branch (0.052) indicating that
selection using these characters would be effective in improving bean yield in Arabica coffee.
Whereas, internode length (-1.860), number of primary branch (-1.802), height up to first primary
branch (-0.609), main stem diameter (-0.444) and number of main stem nodes (-0.232) exerted
negative effect on coffee yield. High indirect effects of the characters were noticed through number
of primary branch indicating importance of the character as selection criteria in crop yield
improvement programs.

Key words: Coffea arabica, Coffee Berry Disease, Correlation, Path analysis.

INTRODUCTION

Coffee belongs to the genus Coffea in the Rubiaceae
family. About124 species in this genus are known to be
predominantly grown in tropical and sub-tropical area of
the world (Davis et al., 2012).Arabica coffee (Coffea
arabica Linnaeus) is the only allotetraploid species
(2n=4x=44) (Lashermes et al., 1999), whereas the rest
are diploid and self-incompatible with the exception of
Coffea hetrocalyx and Coffea anthonyi (Nowak et al.,
2012). Coffea arabica Linnaeus and Coffea canephora
Pierre are the two most widely cultivated species in the
world.
*Corresponding Author: Lemi Beksisa, Ethiopian
Institute of Agricultural Research, Jimma Agricultural
Research Center, P.O.Box, 192, Jimma, Ethiopia. E:
mail: lbeksisa@gmail.com, Tel: +251910822464

Correlation and path coefficient analysis for yield and yield components in some Ethiopian accessions of Arabica Coffee
Beksisa et al. 179
Arabica coffee is an amphidiploid formed by hybridization
between Coffea eugeniodes and Coffea canephora, or
ecotypes related to these diploid species (Lashermes et
al., 1999).Arabica coffee is believed to have originated in
South Western montane rainforests of Ethiopia, the place
where it has its center of genetic diversity (Seyoum,
2003), while Robusta coffee originated from Central and
Western equatorial Africa (Ferwerda, 1976).Arabica
coffee (Coffea arabica Linnaeus) considered as a high
quality coffee and contributes more than 60% of the world
coffee production (Van der Vossen et al., 2015).Besides,
about 25 million families in 51 countries make a living
from it (Varangisetal et al., 2002).
In addition, Ethiopia is the largest producer of coffee in
Sub-Saharan Africa and is the fifth largest coffee
producer in the world next to Brazil, Vietnam, Colombia
and Indonesia, contributing about 7 to 10% of total world
coffee production (Gray et al., 2013). Being an important
beverage crop in the world, coffee has a significant
contribution to Ethiopias economy which provides about
30% of the foreign exchange earnings (International
Coffee organization, 2014). It is also important to the
Ethiopian economy as there are about 15 million people
whose livelihoods are directly or indirectly derived from
coffee (Gray et al., 2013).
The knowledge of certain genetic parameters is essential
for proper understanding and their manipulation in any
crop improvement program (Arshad et al., 2006).
Specifically, knowledge of correlation coefficient is
invaluable in selecting the breeding materials for
improving complex characters through indirect selection
(Teklewold et al., 2000). There are several reasons for
using indirect selection. Sometimes the main character is
expressed late or measurement of the indirect character
is much easier than for the direct character. As it is well
known, yield is complex character and is dependent on
many other morphological characters which are mostly
inherited quantitatively. Therefore, adequate knowledge
of association between yield and its contributing
characters has a great importance in plant breeding that
enables plant breeders to breed for high yielding
genotypes with desired combinations of characters (Khan
and Dar, 2010).
The simple correlation analysis could not fully explain the
relationship among the characters. Knowledge of
correlations, if accompanied by the understanding of the
path analysis (direct and indirect) of each component
character to the final makeup of the yield would be
effective in selecting the genotypes and using them in the
crop improvement programme. Path analysis helpsin
determining yield contributing characters and thus is
useful in indirect selection. Thus, correlation and the path
coefficient analysis would provide a true picture of
Correlation and path coefficient analysis for yield and yield components in some Ethiopian accessions of Arabica Coffee
genetic association among different characters (Bhatt,
1973).
In Arabica coffee breeding programs, a lot of studies on
characters associations have been conducted elsewhere
but rarely in Ethiopian. For instance, Olika et al. (2011)
on 49 Limmu coffee accessions, Ermias (2005) on 81
West Welega coffee accessions, Yigzaw (2005) on 16
Northwest and Southwest of Ethiopia coffee accessions
have reported that characters such as number of primary
branch, stem girth, canopy diameter and plant height are
known to be related with and significantly influence yield
of Arabica coffee.
Yield is among the main criteria for selection in coffee
trees, which usually has biennial bearing nature probably
due to lack of appropriate agronomic management and is
influenced by different morphological characters (Ferro
et al., 2008). Moreover, selections to improve yield
directly may be difficult and time consuming especially for
perennial tree crops with a long juvenile period such as
coffee (Yigzaw, 2005). Therefore, the quantification and
knowledge of the nature of the correlation between yield
and morphological characters can be useful in the
selection of coffee (Dhaliwal, 1968). However in Ethiopia,
despite the demands of consumers, greater socio-
economic benefits of coffee cultivation and huge
influence of other agronomic characters on coffee yield,
coffee breeding programs on the improvement of other
agronomic traits as well as the study on the nature of
associations among characters and the yield was limited.
Therefore, the present study was conducted to
investigate the interrelationship among quantitative
characters and path coefficient analysis of Limmu coffee
accessions for a more efficient planning of the coffee
improvement program.
MATERIALS AND METHODS
Site Description
The experiment was conducted at Agaro Agricultural
Research Sub Center of the Jimma Agricultural Research
Center located at the South-Western part of Ethiopia. It is
45 km from Jimma and 397 km from the capital city of the
country, Addis Ababa. Agaro is located at a latitudinal
gradient of 75035 75100N and a longitudinal
gradient of 363530E with an altitude of 1650 m above
sea level. The mean annual rainfall of the area is about
1616 mm with an average maximum and minimum air
temperatures of 28.4C and 12.4C respectively (Elias,
2005). The major soil type is Mollic Nitisols with pH 6.2,
7.07% organic matter, 0.42% nitrogen, 11.9 ppm
phosphorus and 39.40 cmol(+)/kg CEC (Zebene et al.,
2008).
 Int. J. Plant Breeding Crop Sci. 180

Table: 1. Passport data of coffee accessions collected from Limmu coffee growing areas in 2001

Collection Farmers Local name of Altitude range of Collections number/s

districts Association accessions in the collected areas
area (m.a.s.l)
Limmu- Kossa Weleke -sombo Gajo 1550-1550 L01/2001, L03/2001, L04/2001
>> Debello >> 1720-1720 L06/2001,L07/2001
>> Suntu Dalecho 1530-1850 L12/2001, L13/2001, L14/2001, L15/2001,
L16/2001, L17/2001, L18/2001, L19/2001,
L20/2001, L23/2001
>> Dambi -gabena - 1725 L28/2001
>> Chakawo - 1720-1740 L29/2001, L30/2001
>> Mecha -dire - 1500 L32/2001, L33/2001, L34/2001
>> Charake Miaa 1650 L35/2001, L36/2001, L37/2001, L38/2001,
L39/2001, L40/2001
>> Tenabo >> 1620 L41/2001
>> Chime Kerenso 1660 L43/2001, L44/2001, L45/2001
>> Meto -Gundib 1725-1760 L46/2001, L47/2001, L48/2001, L49/2001,
- L50/2001

>> Tenabo - 1620 L51/2001

>> Chime - 1660 L52/2001
>> Mecha- Dire Miaa 1500 L53/2001
>> Cheraki >> L54/2001, L55/2001
>> Yedo Gota L56/2001
>> Limmu- Kossa Dalecho 1540-1600 L65/2001, L66/2001, L67/2001, L68/2001,
L69/2001, L70/2001

Limmu-Seka Gujil 1600-1620 L24/2001, L25/2001, L26/2001, L27/2001

-
>> DegoJiru >> 1550 L57/2001, L58/2001, L59/2001, L60/2001,
L61/2001

>> Gejib Kerenso L62/2001, L63/2001, L64/2001

- - - - 744(Check)
- - - - F-59(Check)
Source: Extracted from passport data existing in Jimma Agricultural Research Center (JARC) coffee breeding department

Plant Materials
Sixty two accessions with two released
coffee berry disease (CBD) resistant varieties, F-59 and
744 as checks were included in this study (Table 1).
Implementation and Experimental Design
The trial was carried out from 2001 to 2012 cropping
seasons in 8x8 simple lattice design with two replications
and each replicate had border rows. The plot consisted of
two rows with four trees per row, while the spacing was
2mx2m between rows and plants. All field management
practices were done properly and timely as per the
recommendation for the area (EIAR/JARC, 1996; Endale
et al., 2008). Mean yield data from the last six years of
cropping seasons were used, while the other agronomic
characters were taken once throughout the experimental
period. Four plants were taken at random from each plot
for data collection on different agronomic characters,
whereas all plants per plot were considered for evaluation
of the accessions for yield.
Data and data management
Data were collected for the following quantitative
characters:
Height up to first primary (cm): The height from ground
level up to first primary branch was measured in cm.
Plant height (cm): Measured in cm from the ground level
to the tip of apical shoot using meter tape.
Number of primary branches: Total number of primary
branches was counted for each tree.
Main stem diameter (mm): The diameter of the main
stem was measured at 5 cm above the ground level
using digital caliper.

Correlation and path coefficient analysis for yield and yield components in some Ethiopian accessions of Arabica Coffee
 Beksisa et al. 181

Table 2. Analysis of variances (mean square) and relative efficiency for different morphological characters of sixty four Arabica Coffee Accessions

Treatment Error
Characters Replication Adjusted Unadjusted Blocks within rep(adj) Intra block RCBD CV% RE
1
Degree of freedom 63 63 14 49 63
st 190.37*
Number of 1 primary branch 63.63** 80.09 59.71 21.21 29.76 8.84 122.75
Canopy diameter 17555.87** 282.98** 309.85 262.99 126.03 156.47 6.73 111.27
Internodes length 0.97** 0.46** 0.55 0.22 0.13 0.15 5.71 105.55
Number of main stem nodes 88.44** 16.86** 21.27 15.34 4.19 6.67 7.55 136.97
ns
st 104.53 97.70
Length of 1 primary branch 148.14* 161.26 70.18 78.31 76.5 10.29
ns
st 21.70 108.68
Height up to 1 primary branch 32.72** 39.27 24.68 12.94 15.55 10.48
ns
Stem diameter 0.06 0.26** 0.35 0.23 0.08 0.11 7.23 123.71
Total plant height 7658.76** 762.48* 1168.90 1050.21 400.99 545.26 9.62 119.55
ns
Yield 619634.95 265669.46** 293666 195330 118739 135760 18.99 105.17
*, **, ns indicates significance at 0.05, 0.01 probability levels and none significance respectively, CV=Coefficient of variation, RCBD=Randomized
complete block design and RE= Relative efficiency

Canopy diameter (cm): The diameter of the trees was

=
measured in East-West and added to the South-North
diameter and divided by two. .
(TH HFPB )
Internodes length (cm): Computed as where,
(NN 1)
Where, pxy is phenotypic covariance between characters
TH=total height, HFPB=height up to first primary branch,
x and y; px is phenotypic variance of character x; py
2 2
NN=number of nodes on main stem.
is phenotypic variance of character y.
Numbers of main stem nodes: Number of nodes on
Statistically significance of genotypic and phenotypic
main stem counted.
st correlation coefficients was determined by using t test
Length of the 1 primary branch (cm): Length of first
as described by (Steel and Torrie, 1980).
longest primary branch measured from main stem to the
tip of the branch.
Path coefficient analysis
Yield (kg/ha): Fresh cherries were harvested from all
plants of the plot and converted to clean coffee bean
Path coefficient analysis was computed following the
yield in kg per hectare.
method of (Dewey and Lu, 1959)
Rij=Pij+ rikpkj
Statistical Analysis
rij = Mutual association between the independent
character (i) and dependent character(j) as measured by
Analysis of Variance (ANOVA)
the correlation coefficient.
Pij = Component of direct effects of the independent
Statistical Analyses Software version 9.2 (SAS, 2008)
character (i) and dependent character (j) as measured by
was used for statistical computations and estimation of
the path coefficient and, rikpkj= Summation of
differences among accessions.
components of indirect effect of a given independent
character (i) on the given independent character (j) via all
Estimation of Correlation coefficients
other independent character (k).
Genotypic coefficient of correlation (rg) and phenotypic
Estimation of residual effect
coefficient of correlation (rp) were computed according to
(Miller et al., 1958).


2
Where: R = pij. rij
= pij = Component of direct effects of the independent
. character (i) and dependent character (j) as measured by
the path coefficient.

Where, gxy is genotypic covariance between characters
x and y; gxis genotypic variance of character x; gyis
2 2
genotypic variance of character y.
rij = Mutual association between the independent
character (i) and dependent character (j) as measured by
the correlation coefficient.

Correlation and path coefficient analysis for yield and yield components in some Ethiopian accessions of Arabica Coffee

RESULT AND DISCUSSION
Simple lattice design was more efficient than
Randomized Complete Block Design (RCBD) for almost
all characters (Table 2). Therefore, the use of simple
lattice design was justified. The analysis of variance
revealed highly significance differences between
accessions for most of the characters investigated (Table
Genotypic and phenotypic correlation coefficients
Genotypic and phenotypic correlations between yield and
most of yield related characters were positive and
significant (Table 3). In general, genotypic correlation
coefficients were higher in magnitude than the
corresponding phenotypic correlation coefficients for
almost all of the characters, indicating that there is a
strong inherent association between the characters
studied.
Coffee yield had positive genotypic and phenotypic
correlations coefficients levels with all characters except
height up to first primary branch. Among the characters
studied, the correlation was statistically significant with
number of primary branch, canopy diameter, number of
main stem nodes and main stem diameter, indicating
greater importance and reliability of these characters for
selection for improvement of yield in coffee. As one of
these characters is improved, an enhancement or
improvement of coffee yield is also achieved. Thus, the
breeders should mainly be focused over these characters
while planning for selection program of crop
improvement. This finding is partly in agreement with
(Yigzaw, 2005 and Olika et al., 2011) whose reported
positive and significant correlation of most of the
quantitative characters with yield. Srinivasan (1980)
reported high positive correlation of stem girth and length
of primary branches with yield. Similarly, Walyaro and
Van der Vossen (1979) also reported significant and
positive genotypic correlations between yield and girth at
the base of the main stem. Walyaro (1983) and Marandu
et al. (2004) also reported that coffee yield is influenced
by most important characters like number of primary
branches, canopy diameter, plant height and main stem
diameter.
On the other hand, yield showed positive but statistically
non-significant correlation with plant height, internode
length and length of first primary branch. This indicated
indirect selection based on any of these characters
studied would not provide satisfactory gains for coffee
yield. The interrelationship of the characters may be due
to the genotype or environment influence in different
ways, thus making the selection and the improvement
programs become unreliable. Similarly, Ermias (2005)
also reported weak and non-significant correlation of
internode length with average yield. In this study, yield
Correlation and path coefficient analysis for yield and yield components in some Ethiopian accessions of Arabica Coffee
Int. J. Plant Breeding Crop Sci. 182
2). This indicates the presence of considerable diversity
among accessions which indicates immense opportunity
for an effective selection and hybridization program. This
is in agreement with Mesfin and Bayetta (2005) and
Getachew et al. (2013) who also reported the presence of
significant difference between Arabica Coffee accessions
for different characters.
was significantly and negatively correlated with only
height up to first primary branch for both genotypic and
phenotypic levels. This implied that through shortness in
height up to first primary branch, high yield of coffee
accessions could be achieved in efforts of variety
development in selection program. Therefore, it is
suggested that independent selection may have to be
carried out for improvement of each character.
In addition, canopy diameter, plant height and main stem
diameter showed significant positive correlation with most
of the characters. In this case, the breeding implication is
that selection of one of the characters will implicitly result
in the improvement of the other characters. In studies of
genetic divergence and the processes of evaluation and
selection, it is important to maintain traits that are
correlated with the majority of traits (Ferro et al., 2008).
On the other hand, number of primary branch showed
positive and highly significant correlation with canopy
diameter, number of main stem nodes and plant height.
The result indicated that, the greater the number of the
first primary branches, the larger will be the canopy
diameter and plant height and thus ultimately contributing
directly and positively towards the yield. Similar results
were reported by Olika et al. (2011) in Arabica coffee and
Marandu et al. (2004) in Robusta coffee. Likewise,
correlation of canopy diameter with internode length,
number of main stems node, plant height, main stem
diameter and yield was positive and significant.
In this study, interestingly most of the characters which
were negatively correlated with each other at both
genotypic and phenotypic correlations coefficients did not
significantly affect each other except, selection for
internode length could negatively affect the improvement
of number of primary branch and number of main stem
nodes as these characters showed negative and
significant correlation both at genotypic and phenotypic
correlation coefficients. This implied that, the selection for
any one of these characters is not likely to result in
improvement of the others. In such a situation, it is
suggested that independent selection may have to be
carried for improvement of each character.
Path coefficient analysis
The main selection criterion in coffee is production
(Oliveira et al., 2011). Other agronomic characters
Beksisa et al. 183

Table 3. Genotypic (above diagonal) and phenotype (below diagonal) correlation coefficient among 9characters
in 64 Arabica coffee

NFPB CD INL NMSN LFPB PH HuFPB MSD YLD

1
ns ns
NFPB 0.506** -0.420** 0.989** -0.245 0.532** -0.214 0.722** 0.494**
0.429**
ns
CD 1 0.434** 0.520** 0.317* 0.567** 0.156 0.620** 0.602**
ns
-0.212
ns ns ns
INL 0.297** 1 -0.428** 0.048 0.393** 0.518** 0.113 0.168
0.972**
ns ns
NMSN 0.402** -0.266* 1 -0.182 0.488** -0.192 0.721** 0.408**
ns
0.027
ns ns ns ns ns ns
LFPB 0.184 0.061 0.011 1 -0.196 0.228 0.290* 0.244
ns ns
PH 0.652** 0.456** 0.329** 0.629** 0.044 1 0.386** 0.800** 0.043
ns
-0.074
ns ns ns ns ns ns ns
HuFPB 0.197 0.189 -0.087 0.159 0.202 1 0.043 -0.063
0.596**
ns ns
MSD 0.570** 0.121 0.579** 0.236** 0.605** 0.149 1 0.580**
0.379**
** ns ns ns
YLD 0.288 0.119 0.322* 0.104 0.347** -0.075 0.323* 1
PH= Plant height, HuFPB= height up to first primary branch, MSD = main Stem diameter, LFPB= average length of
primary branches, NFPB= number of primary branches, NMSN= number of main stem nodes, INL= Inter node length,
CD= canopy diameter, YLD= Yield.

Table 4. Pathanalysis(effects of characters on yield)

Characters NFPB CD INL NMSN LFPB PH HuFPB MSD Ind.Eff rg

NFPB -1.802 0.787 0.782 -0.234 -0.013 1.164 0.130 -0.321 2.295 0.494
CD -0.912 1.555 -0.808 -0.120 0.017 1.240 -0.095 -0.275 0.953 0.602
INL 0.758 0.675 -1.860 0.099 0.002 0.859 -0.315 -0.050 2.028 0.168
NMSN -1.822 0.810 0.797 -0.232 -0.010 1.068 0.117 -0.320 0.640 0.408
LFPB 0.442 0.493 -0.089 0.042 0.052 -0.429 -0.139 -0.129 0.191 0.244
PH -0.959 0.882 -0.731 -0.113 -0.010 1.564 -0.235 -0.355 -1.521 0.043
HuFPB 0.386 0.242 -0.963 0.044 0.012 0.844 -0.609 -0.019 0.546 -0.063
MSD -1.302 0.964 -0.210 -0.167 0.015 1.750 -0.026 -0.444 1.024 0.580
Residual Effect= 0.3343039
TPH= plant height, HuFPB= height up to first primary branch, MSD = Main Stem diameter, LFPB= average length of primary
branches, NFPB= number of primary branches, NMSN= number of main stem nodes, IL= Inter node length, CD= canopy
diameter

related to yield potential have been studied to increase
the indirect selection efficiency (Petek et al., 2008; Pinto
et al., 2012). In this study, the positive direct effect on
coffee yield was exerted by plant height (1.564), canopy
diameter (1.555) and length of first primary branch
(0.052). This indicates that, with other characters kept
constant, direct selection on the basis of canopy
diameter, length of first primary branch and plant height
would be much effective for the improvement of coffee
yield. This is usually happens and they are well known as
the most important characters that influence the coffee
yield directly. Ermias (2005) also revealed positive direct
effect of plant height but negative direct effects of canopy
diameter and length of primary branch on yield.
Moreover, Srinivasan (1980) reported that greater weight
Correlation and path coefficient analysis for yield and yield components in some Ethiopian accessions of Arabica Coffee
should be given for longer primaries and shorter inter
nodes in selection for yield, as they had direct positive
effects.
However, in this study, even though the length of first
primary branch was positively exerted in coffee yield,
positive indirect effects of length of first primary branch
through number of primary branch and canopy diameter
were higher than its positive direct effect. In this case, the
indirect selection of this character via number of primary
branch and canopy diameter will be more beneficial for
crop improvement.
On the other hand, internode length (-1.860), number of
primary branch (-1.802), height up to first primary branch
(-0.609), main stem diameter (-0.444) and number of

main stem nodes (-0.232) which had positive genotypic
and phenotypic correlation coefficient with yield except
height up to first primary branch exerted negative effect
on yield. The miss match between correlation coefficient
and direct effects indicated that, the strong correlation of
these characters with yield was largely due to their
indirect effects through the other characters. For
instance, number of primary branch had positive indirect
effect via canopy diameter, internode length, plant height
and height up to first primary branch and the indirect
effect of this character via the other characters was
cumulatively 2.295 which was higher than that of direct
effect (-1.802). Therefore, the strong coefficient of
correlation of this character with yield was due to
masking effects of the positive indirect effects via the
other characters on negative direct effect. In this case,
the improvement of the bean yield can be achieved by
indirect selection via other characters.
Among the characters studied, the positive highest direct
effect on coffee yield was exerted by plant height (1.564)
and canopy diameter (1.555). Internode length (-1.860)
and number of primary branches (-1.802) also exerted
high negative effects on yield. In the contrary, length of
first primary branch (0.052) followed by number of main
stem nodes (-0.232) showed the lowest direct effects on
yield. However, the encountered indirect effect of number
of main stem nodes via plant height (1.068) was relatively
high.
Similarly, internode length revealed positive indirect effect
on yield through almost all characters, except height up
to first primary branch and main stem diameter. Number
of main stem node also indirectly exerted positive effects
on yield via all characters except number of primary
branch, length of first primary branch and main stem
diameter. Main stem diameter indirectly exerted positive
effects via canopy diameter, length of first primary branch
and plant height. Either direct or indirect selection of main
stem diameter will not be made beneficial for increasing
coffee yield due to its direct and indirect effects on yield.
Moreover, internodes length which had positive
correlation coefficients with yield and height up to first
primary branch which had negative correlation coefficient
with yield but not significantly also revealed negative
direct effect on yield. Therefore, the direct selection for
these characters to improve the yield will not be
desirable. Ermias (2005) also reported negative direct
effects of height up to first primary branch on yield but
contrary to this finding; there was positive indirect effect
of internode length on yield. In general, high indirect
effects of most of the characters were noticed through
number of primary branch indicating importance of the
character as selection criteria in crop yield improvement
programs.
The residual effect permits precise explanation about the
pattern of interaction of other possible components of
Correlation and path coefficient analysis for yield and yield components in some Ethiopian accessions of Arabica Coffee
Int. J. Plant Breeding Crop Sci. 184
yield. In other words, residual effect measures the role of
other independent variables which were not included in
the study on the dependent variable. In this study, the
estimated residual effect was 0.33 indicating that about
67% of the variability in yield was contributed by the
characters studied in path analysis. This residual effect
towards yield in this study might be mainly due to the
other characters which are not included in the
investigation, environmental factor and sampling errors.
Therefore, the aspect of intensive germplasm exploration
in the Limmu coffee considering additional characters
was suggested in order to confirm the results. In general,
the path analysis carried out in the present study
revealed that the main components of bean yield which
had positive direct effect of bean yield should be given
high priority for making selection for high yielding
accessions in Limmu coffee.
CONCLUSION
Genotypic associations are higher than phenotypic
associations, demonstrating a greater influence of
genetic than that of environmental factors. Characters
like, number of primary branch, canopy diameter, number
of main stem nodes and main stem diameter had positive
and significant correlation with yield, which indicates the
selection of these characters would give better response
in yield. However, height up to first primary branch alone
showed negative and non-significant significant genotypic
and phenotypic correlation with yield. This means
simultaneous selection for the character might negatively
affect the improvement of coffee yield. Moreover, path
analysis indicated that greater weight should be given to
accessions having larger canopy diameter, longer plant
height and longer of first primary branches in selection for
yield, as shown by their positive direct effects. High
indirect effects of the characters were noticed through
number of primary branch indicating importance of the
character also as selection criteria in crop yield
improvement programs. Hence, based on correlation and
path analysis, the characters viz., canopy diameter, plant
height, number of primary branch and length of first
primary branch influenced coffee yield directly and/or
indirectly. Therefore, it is clearly understood that, this
study showed coffee breeders to restrict selections for
coffee improvement emphasizing to a few number of
component characters. This can be helpful in minimizing
the time required to search for more component
characters and improve the efficiency of the breeding
program.
ACKNOWLEDGMENT
Authors are thankful to their colleagues specially Jimma
Coffee project staff members for their collaborative work
during the experiment execution and data collection.
They are also thankful to Agaro Agricultural Research
Beksisa et al. 185
Sub Center staff for maintaining experimental fields and
helping in data recording.
REFERENCES
Arshad M, Ali N,Ghafoor A (2006). Character correlation
and path coefficient in soybean Glycine max (L.)
Merrill. Pakistan Journal of Botany, 38(1), p.121.
Bhatt GM (1973). Significance of path coefficient analysis
in determining the nature of character association.
Euphytica, 22(2), pp.338-343.
Davis AP, Gole TW, Baena S, Moat J. (2012). The impact
of climate change on natural populations of Arabica
coffee: Predicting future trends and identifying
priorities. PLoSONE, 7(11): e47981.
Dhaliwal, TS (1968). Correlations between yield and
morphological characters in Puerto Rican and
Columnaris varieties of Coffea arabica L. Journal of
Agriculture of University of Puerto Rico, 52: 29-37.
Dewey DR, Lu K (1959). A correlation and path-
coefficient analysis of components of crested
wheatgrass seed production. Agronomy journal, 51(9),
pp.515-518.
Elias A (2005). Economics of Coffee bean marketing: A
case study of Gomma woreda in Jimma zone of
Ethiopia. M.Sc. Thesis, Graduate studies of Haramaya
University, Haramaya, Ethiopia.
Endale T, Taye K, Antenhe N, Tesfaye Sh, Alemseged Y,
Tesfaye A (2008).Research on coffee field
management.pp.187-195. In: Girma, A., Bayetta, B.,
Tesfaye, S., Endale, T., Taye, K. (eds.). Coffee
Diversity and Knowledge. Proceedings of a National
Workshop Four Decades of Coffee Research and
Development in Ethiopia, 14-17 August 2007, Addis
Ababa, Ethiopia.
Ermias H (2005). Evaluation of Wellega Coffee
Germplasm for yield, yield Components and
Resistance to Coffee Berry Disease at early bearing
stage. A Thesis Submitted to the faculty of the
department of Plant Sciences, School of Graduate
Studies Alemaya University in Partial Fulfillment of The
Requirements for the Degree of Master of Science in
Agriculture (Plant Breeding).
Ferro RG, Ferreira A, Cruz CD, Cecon PR, Ferro
MAG, da Fonseca AFA., de Souza Carneiro PC, da
Silva MF (2008). Inter-trait relations for direct and
indirect selection in coffee. Crop Breeding and Applied
Biotechnology, 8(4), pp.271-278.
Ferwerda FP (1976). Coffee. In N.W. Simpsons, ed.
Evolution of crop plants, Longman, London. Pp. 257-
260.
Getachew W, Sentayehu A, Taye K, Tadesse B. (2013).
Genetic Diversity Analysis of Some Ethiopian Specialty
Coffee (Coffea arabica L.) Germplasm Accessions
Based on Morphological Traits. Time Journals of
Agriculture and Veterinary Sciences. Vol. 1 (4): 47-54.
Correlation and path coefficient analysis for yield and yield components in some Ethiopian accessions of Arabica Coffee
Gray Q, Tefera A, Tefera T. (2013). Ethiopia: Coffee
annual report. GAlN Report No.ET-1302, GAIN Report
Assessment of Commodity and Trade by USDA, USA.
EIAR/JARC. (1996). Recommended Production
Technologies for Coffee and Associated Crops.
Ethiopian Institute of Agricultural Research, Jimma
Agricultural Research Center.
International Coffee Organization (ICO),
2014.FourthInternational World coffee
Conference.112th session from 7-14 march 14.
London, United Kingdom. Available on:
http://dev.ico.org/documents/cy2013-14/wcc-ethiopia-
presentation.pdf.
Khan MH, Dar AN (2010).Correlation and path coefficient
analysis of some quantitative characters in wheat.
African Crop Science Journal, 18(1).
Olika K,Sentayehu A, Taye K, Wayessa G (2011).
Variability of quantitative traits in limmu coffee (Coffea
arabica L.) in Ethiopia. International Journal of
Agricultural Research, 6(6), pp.482-493.
Lashermes P, Combes MC, Robert J, Trouslot P, D'hont
A, Anthony F, Charrier A. (1999). Molecular
characterization and origin of the Coffea arabica L.
genome. Molecular and General Genetics MGG,
261(2), pp.259-266.
Marandu EFT, Reuben SOWM, Misangu RN (2004).
Genotypic correlations and paths of influence among
components of yield in selected Robusta coffee
(Coffeacanephora L.)Clones.West African Journal of
Applied Ecology, 5(1).
Mesfin K, Bayetta B. (2005). Genetic divergence of
Hararge Coffee (Coffea arabica L.) germplasm
accessions at pre-bearing stage. Proceedings of the
th
20 International conference on Coffee Science,
Oct.11-15, Bangalore, India. pp. 1107-1112.
Miller PA, Williams JC, Robinson HF, Comstock RE
(1958). Estimates of genotypic and environmental
variances and covariances in upland cotton and their
implications in selection .Agronomy Journal, 50(3),
pp.126-131.
Oliveira AD, Pereira AA, Silva FLD, Rezende JCD,
Botelho CE, Carvalho GR (2011).Prediction of genetic
gains from selection in Arabica coffee progenies. Crop
Breeding and Applied Biotechnology, 11(2), pp.106-
113.
Petek MR, Sera T, Fonseca IDB (2008). Predio de
valores genticos aditivos na seleo visando obter
cultivares de caf mais resistentes ferrugem.
Bragantia, 67(1), pp.133-140.
Pinto MF, Carvalho GR, Botelho CE, Gonalves FMA,
Rezende JD, Ferreira AD (2012). Eficincia na seleo
de prognies de cafeeiro avaliadas em Minas Gerais.
Bragantia, 71(1), pp.1-7.
Nowak MD, Davis AP, Yoder AD (2012). Sequence data
from new plastid and nuclear COSII regions resolves
early diverging lineages in Coffea (Rubiaceae).
Systematic Botany, 37(4), pp.995-1005.

SAS (2008).Statistical analysis system (version 9.2), SAS
Institute, Cary, NC.USA.
Seyoum S (2003). Genetic divergence for seedling
parameters and associations among agronomic traits in
the Ethiopian coffee (Coffea arabica L.) germplasm. An
M.Sc. thesis submitted to the School of graduate
studies of Alemaya University
Srinivasan CS (1980). Association of some vegetative
characters with initial fruit yield in coffee (Coffea
arabica L.).Journal of Coffee Research (India) v. 10 (2)
p. 21-27.
Steel RGD, Torrie JH, Dickey M. (1980). A biometrical
approach. Principles and Procedures of Statistics, pp.8-
566.
Teklewold A, Jayaramaiah H, Gowda J.(2000). Genetic
divergence study in sunflower (Helianthus annuus
L.). Helia, 23(32), pp.93-104.
Varangis P, Lewin B, Giovannucci D. (2002). Central
America, Dealing with the Coffee Crisis Impacts and
Strategies. World Bank, Policy Research Working
Paper, No. 2993.
Van der Vossen HM, Bertrand B, Charrier A. (2015). Next
generation variety development for sustainable
production of arabica coffee (Coffea arabica L.): a
review. Euphytica, 204(2), pp.243-256.
Walyaro DJA (1983). Considerations in breeding for
improved yield and quality in arabica coffee (Coffea
arabica L.) (Doctoral dissertation, Landbouwhoge
school te Wageningen).
Walyaro DJ, Van der Vossen HAM (1979). Early
Correlation and path coefficient analysis for yield and yield components in some Ethiopian accessions of Arabica Coffee
Int. J. Plant Breeding Crop Sci. 186
determination of yield potential in arabica coffee by
applying index selection.Euphytica,28(2), pp.465-472.
Yigzaw D, (2005). Assessment of genetic diversity of
Ethiopian Arabica coffee accessions using
morphological, biochemical and molecular markers. A
PhD Dissertation, University of the free state, South
Africa. p197.
Zebene M, Wondwosen T (2008). Potential and
constraints of Nitosol and Acrisols. Coffee Diversity and
Knowledge. Proceedings of a National Workshop Four
Decades of Coffee Research and Development in
Ethiopia, 14-17 August 2007, Addis Ababa, Ethiopia.
pp. 203-216.
Accepted 26 March, 2017.
Citation: Beksisa L, Ayano A, Benti T (2017). Correlation
and path coefficient analysis for yield and yield
components in some Ethiopian accessions of Arabica
Coffee. International Journal of Plant Breeding and Crop
Science, 4(2): 178-186.
Copyright: 2017 Beksisa et al. This is an open-access
article distributed under the terms of the Creative
Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted
use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium,
provided the original author and source are cited.