Professional Documents
Culture Documents
THE AUSTRALIAN
S UBSCRIBE
Cookie Policy
Making a late stand for coal will cost, but it may be the price of security. Nor can we exult in renewables. They are
causing real damage to the economy.
We know for a fact that reliance on renewable energy is not whats causing these blackouts. This was Charlie
Pickerings invitation to Kitty Flanagan to make fun of 90,000 houses blacked out in South Australia (ABCs The
Weekly, February 15).
Pickering and Flanagan selected the first report of the Australian Energy Market Operator (October 5, 2016), which
blamed the outage on the destruction of power lines. The pair did not disclose the later report (October 19), which
showed nine of the 13 wind farms did not ride through the six voltage disturbances.
Sorry, Charlie, we know for a fact that renewable energy is a cause of the blackouts.
The delicious irony is that the renewable policies will destroy the value of existing renewables. Victorias state-based
renewable energy target, for example, will force a significant amount of additional renewables into the market in a
short period, which will suppress wholesale prices on windy and sunny days.
The same winds blow across Victoria and South Australia, so existing wind farms in Victoria tend to generate at the
same time. Not good for business.
Having buggered the energy market, the Coalition and Labor will return to their corners to fight over the carcass.
Meanwhile, each party can tell its remaining branch members what Bangladesh, a nation most prone to rising seas, is
likely to do.
The mindset in Australia, the US and Europe, is to stop digging and burning coal to lower the emissions from coal.
The Bangladesh priority, however, is that it needs not less coal, but more.
According to Copenhagen Consensus Centre economists Herath Gunatilake and David Roland-Holst, the benefits of
increasing energy supply by importing coal are more than 24 times the cost, even when accounting for the cost of
added greenhouse gas emissions.
1 of 3 13/04/2017 2:12 PM
Coal has a role yet in keeping economies as healthy as possible http://www.theaustralian.com.au/opinion/columnists/gary-johns/coal-has-...
The question is, assuming that climate hazards increase with time, what will be the best strategy for a poorly
developed country like Bangladesh? The answer is that building resilience to climate change should be a top priority.
A developing country could spend its money trying to abate carbon dioxide emissions or it could invest in carbon-
intensive energy, buy productive technologies and accumulate enough resources to tackle climate change
successfully.
The question for Bangladesh is how much it should spend on abatement and how much on adaptation. Should it build
cyclone shelters or shift the population to higher ground? Should it build higher barriers to withstand rising waters or
build a stronger economy to pay for them?
In a parallel Copenhagen exercise, Alexander and Elena Golub found that relocation of the population inland was the
most efficient risk mitigation intervention. They recommended that over the next 20 years one million people now
exposed to a high cyclone threat (and these occur regardless of climate change) should be relocated.
And what would help drive the climate change responses? Cheap energy: gas and coal. Among those in the world
who take climate risks seriously, most will do what we have chosen not to: keep a healthy economy, and adapt.
garytjohns@gmail.com
2 of 3 13/04/2017 2:12 PM
Coal has a role yet in keeping economies as healthy as possible http://www.theaustralian.com.au/opinion/columnists/gary-johns/coal-has-...
A NOTE ABOUT RELEVANT ADVERTISING: We collect information about the content (including ads) you use across this site and use it to make both advertising and content more
relevant to you on our network and other sites. This is also known as Online Behavioural Advertising. You can find out more about our policy and your choices, including how
to opt-out here
3 of 3 13/04/2017 2:12 PM