Professional Documents
Culture Documents
The Manuvu
a. Geographic Area
i. The Dallag Plateau are is situated on the divide splitting Davao City and Cotabato. It is the
east central part of the territory occupied by the Manuvu people
1. The geographical area is sandwiched Between, Davao River(west), Pulangi(east),
Mount Sita(north) and Mount Apo(south)
2. Its neighboring tribes included:
a. Matigsalug(northeast),
b. Talaandig (northwest) or Bukidnon
c. Illianon (west)
d. Tahavawa (south) or Bilaan
e. Jangan or Attaw (southeast)
b. Economic Life
i. The Manuvus main staples were
1. Corn and Sweet Potato
2. Rice was produced but the supply usually didnt last more than 3 months after
harvest.
ii. Trade
1. Animals were used mainly as trade items, raising of the bride wealth and in
payment of damages in the settlement of wrongs or delicts.
2. Barkcloth, Gongs were also used as means for exchange
iii. How the Manuvu settled disputes were greatly affected by the presence of trade
1. Before the 20th Century, where trade relationships were not yet completely
establish, the Manuvu settled their disputes using the Law of Retaliation,
a. a rule that demands an eye for an eye or a tooth for a tooth.
2. After trade goods were acquired, the Law of Retaliation was slowly replaced by the
Law of Damages
c. The evolution of Manuvu society could be divided into three stages : Nomadic Existence, Semi-
nomadic and Permanent Village life.
i. The Manuvu people were originally a Nomadic race however this changed as trade
prospered and populations grew.
ii. The Semi-Nomadic: Tribes moved in a circular pattern
1. They used 2 to 3 sites of rotation
2. And the tribes were governed by elders called the Apu and later bayanis who
became recognized based in their respective areas of influence
iii. Permanent Village Life
1. In the 20th Century, Datus became the leaders of the Manuvu.
2. Multi-Datu system became a characteristic of village governments
a. Each village was ruled, usually 2-3 or more Datus depending on the size of
its population
b. Traders were effective Datus because of their accumulation of wealth
which increased their influence in facilitating the settlement of disputes.
3. Datu Duyan consolidated most of the Manuvu, establishing a tribal organization
after the recent war with the use of his knowledge, experience in the pre-war and
occupation years, his benevolent policies and connections with government officials
2. Origin of the Concept of Property and Its Development
a. We now look into the concept of Property for the Manuvu
i. Since language goes to the very origin of culture, these linguistic evidence are importance in
tracing the origin of the concept of property as something that can be possessed in Manuvu
society
b. Language was the earliest manifestation of the concept of property since every system had a
i. Pronominal System have terminologies indicating possession
1. Terminologies indicating possession
2. Kaddi = my mine, kekaw = your yours, kandan = their theirs
ii. Theses possessive pronouns indicate ownership of both Material and non-material things
1. Kaddin u = my head, Ketan baoy = our house are examples of material possessions
2. Kekaw na gona = your warname, kandan bansa = their honor are examples of non-
material possessions
iii. The terminologies are also exclusive
1. They do not recognize any other possession by any other man except the one
indicated by the possessive noun
2. Exclude other kinds of possessors
iv. Manuvu ownership is implied in the Possessive nouns
1. For example, a tribe members gona (war name) was meant for exclusive use
2. Anyone who would attempt to use it would be laughed at or ridiculed
c. Example of early concepts of property among the Manuvu could also be seen in their economic life.
i. The Manuvu people were mainly slash and burn agriculturist but they still practice other
food gathering activites and hunting to supplement their production.
ii. Before they became slash and burn agriculturist, the Manuvu were Food Gatherers
1. One aspect of this activity is Foraging which includes not only picking nuts, fruits,
grubs and insects but also
2. Picking from the bush birds eggs or young
3. Bee-Hive Hauling
iii. They were also fishermen, employing mainly traps to capture fish
1. Traps
a. Buvu
i. bamboo strips and tubular in shape
ii. set below the surface of the river
iii. weighted by stones in the riverbed
iv. where it is inspected everyday
b. daliang
i. trellis like and set below the rapids
ii. abandoned after serving its purpose
iv. Examples of ownership could be seen in these activities
a. With regards to foraging of birds nest and bee hive hauling
b. Twigs were used to mark possession
c. Upon discovery of a birds nest or bee hive on top of a tree, a twig is placed
pointing to the location of the nest or hive,
d. this mark is called tuwos in Manuvu language
i. This serves as a Marking which indicates a claim of ownership.
From the time the tree is marked up to the time the nest or hive is
taken down, there is potential possession
1. It is only potential because the discoverer only has two
days to take the nest or hive before ownership passes
ii. Until then, the discoverer has a right to claim Payment of
Damages against anyone who takes away the nest or the hive
e. Traps
i. Fishermen gain ownership of any fish caught in their traps
2. Examples of these forms of ownership are found in the following cases
d. In Manuvu Case Law No.6, 2nd half of 19th Century
i. Datu Basu discovered a beehive in the forest of Dulis
ii. He cut a small tree and stuck it to the base making a natuwossan, a mark of ownership of the
beehive
iii. He went home to get help from companions
iv. The next morning, he found a group of people hauling the bee hive
v. Datu Basu got angry and unsheathed his blade but Bantak, who was with Datu Basu
intervened to prevent bloodshed
vi. Kag who took the beehive, gave 5 gongs as payment for settlement and an extra gong to
express his regrets
e. Manuvu Case Law No.377, 1964
i. Maggantian set his buvu fishing trap in the Masawang River
ii. Two nights the trap remained undisturbed until Makatubak saw the trap, lifted it and took
one payyat fish which he placed on his basket
iii. Then he took the trap and placed it upstream
iv. The following day Maggantian went to the river to check on his trap
v. Finding the it was no longer there, he went upstream to look for it
vi. While looking upstream, he saw Makatubak holding a buvu trap
vii. He confronted Makatubak, and Makatubak confessed that he took the trap
viii. In order to reconcile Makatubak gave Maggantian a gong as payment for damages
f. The Manavu Law principle that can be derive from the above case is that Anything a man makes
belongs to its maker
i. By products also belong to the owner
g. Another example of ownership can be seen in the Hunting activities of the Manavu
i. Batik or balatik is used to catch wild hogs and deer,
1. The trap is provided with a missile which is released when an animal triggers the
device
2. This trap is regarded as the property of the maker and so is any wild animal that it
catchers.
3. But the balatik is also Dangerous to human life and the owner can be held liable to
harm done to humans or hunting dogs
ii. An example of this is found in
h. Manuvu Case Law No. 174, 1941
i. Alig set 100 batik traps from one end of Dallag to the other end.
ii. Datu Obo had a maharuag hunting dog
iii. The datu was hunting, when he came across a deer and followed it into Dallag where his
hunting dog accidentally triggered one of the batik traps
iv. The dog was killed and Datu Obo demanded that Alig pay damages
v. Alig gave with 4 gongs, 10 inavo(woven abaca) as payment for damages and offered 1
chicken and 1 putaw as sacrifice for the pamaas ritual, a ritual which would give Datu Obo
the gods favor when he hunts again