In some cases, without government regulation, market allocations of land is not efficient. The problems commonly arise in the industrialized countries such as sprawl & leapfrogging, incompatible land uses , undervaluation of environmental amenities, the effects of taxes on land- use conversion, and market power. Some of these problems may also plague developing countries. We will discuss how these factors cause inefficiency in land allocation.
Sprawl and Leapfrogging
Sprawl occurs when land uses in a particular area are inefficiently dispersed, rather than efficiently concentrated. The related problem of leapfrogging refers to a situation in which new development continues not on the very edge of the current development, but farther out. While developers leapfrog over contiguous, perhaps even vacant, land in favor of land that is farther from the center of economic activity. For example, sssuming the cars used for commuting are fueled by gasoline internal combustion engines, dispersal drives up the demand for oil (including imported oil), results in higher air-pollutant emissions levels (including greenhouse gases), and increases the need for more steel, glass, and other raw materials to supply the increase in the number of vehicles demanded. One set of inefficient incentives can be found in the pricing of public services. The developer faced the trade off bteween developing the land more densely within currently served areas and developing the land outside those areas, thereby promoting inefficient levels of sprawl. By lowering the cost of developing farther out, it also increases the likelihood of leapfrogging. This can also bring the negative externalities, as potential residential buyers choose where to live, transportation cost matter because of living farther out. Incompatible Land Uses The value of a parcel of land will be affected not only by its location, but also by how t he nearby land is used. For example, houses near the airport are affected by the noise and neighborhoods near a toxic waste facility may face higher health risks. Another controversial example is an ongoing battle over the location of large industrial farms where hogs are raised for slaughter, these odors and water pollution from animal waste fall on the neighbors. Since these cost are externalized, they tend to be ignored or undervalued by hog farm owners in decisions about the land, creating bias. Undervaluaing Environmental Amenities Some of the landowner may undervalue the enviromental amenities, because many of the beneficial ecosystem goods and services associated with a particular land use may also not accrue exclusively to the landowner. If the owner of the large farm that provides beautiful vistas is approached by someone wanting to buy it for, say, residential development, any self-interested farmer would not consider the loss of the external benefits of the open space to wildlife and to travelers when setting a price. As a result, these benefits are likely to be ignored or undervalued by the landowner, thereby creating a bias in decisions affecting land use. Specifically, in this case, uses that involve more of the undervalued activities will lose out to activities that convey more benefits to the landowner even when, from societys perspective, that choice is clearly inefficient. Subject to inefficient conversion due to the presence of positive externalities involves direct protection of those assets by regulation or statute. The Influence of Taxes on Land-Use Conversion Governments use taxes on land (and facilities on that land) as a source of revenue, even many local governments use it to fund such municipal services as education. In addition to raising the revenue, taxes also can affect incentives to convert land from one to use another which can be not efficient. The tax base (the value of the land) is usually determined either by the market value, as reflected in a recent sale, not by the current use. For example, if the farming, is located in an area under significant development pressure, the tax assessment may reflect the development potential of the land, not its value in farming. Since the value of developable land is typically higher, potentially much higher, the tax payments required by this system may raise farming cost (and lower net income) sufficiently as to promote an inefficient conversion of farmland to development. Market Power The total supply of land is fixed. Market power allows the seller to charge inefficiently high prices, market power can frustrate the ability of the market to achieve efficiency by preventing transfers that would increase social value. One example of this problem is when market power inhibits government acquisitions to advance some public purpose. The private land owner with market power could inefficiently limit the amount of land acquired by the public sector to provide public access to such amenities as parks, bike paths, and nature trails. The main traditional device for controlling the frustration of public purpose problem is the doctrine known as eminent domain. Which the government can legally acquire private property for a public purpose by condemnation as long as the landowner is paid just compensation.
Special Problems in Developing Countries
Insecure Property Rights In many developing countries, property rights to land are either informal or nonexistent. In these cases land uses may be determined on a first-come, first-served basis and the occupiers, called squatters, do not actually hold title to the land. This can lead to efficiency and equity problem. Because there is no clear about the holder of the land, affects both the nature of the land use and incentives to preserve its value and caused the inefficiency. From the equity aspect points out that the absence of property rights gives occupiers no legal defense against competing claims. For example, that some indigenous people have sustainably used a piece of land for a very long period of time, but any implicit property rights they hold are simply unenforceable. The Poverty Problem Main problems in some developing countries is they have no ability to invest in land improvements due to limited labor, land, and cash contraints. They just have the land and unskilled labor as their principal assets. This degradation of land, due to inadequate investment in maintaining it, can cause farmers to migrate from that degraded land to other marginal land, only to have it suffer the same fate. For similar reasons, poverty can exacerbate tropical deforestation, promote overgrazing, and hasten the inefficient conversion of land to agriculture. Government Failure. While both property rights and poverty can be sources of the inefficient allocation of land, government failure can be as well. It occurs when the public policies have the effect of distorting land-use allocations. A common example involves building roads into previously preserved Innovative Market-Based Policy Remedies 249 land, rendering that land suitable (by increasing access and lowering transportation costs) for a number of new land uses. In this case, by lowering transportation costs, the government makes the bid rent functions flatter and, coupled with the undervaluation of environmental amenities, this can lead to an inefficient conversion of land.