Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Modelling
Steve Chapra
Civil and Environmental Engineering
Tufts University
22 June 2012
EUTROPHICATION:
OVERABUNDANT PLANT GROWTH
DUE TO EXCESSIVE
NUTRIENT LOADINGS
Production/Decomposition Cycle in Nature
ORGANIC
MATTER
O2
CO2
INORGANIC
NUTRIENTS
Photosynthesis
6CO2 + 6H2O C6H12O6 + 6O2
Respiration
LIEBIG'S LAW OF THE MINIMUM:
algal protoplasm
40% : 7.2% : 1%
N
other 7.2% P
1%
wet dry 51.8%
90% 10%
C
40%
PHYTOPLANKTON STOICHIOMETRY:
The Redfield Ratio chlorophyll a
D : C : N : P : A
7.2 : 1
Limits to if a = a0 at t = 0
Growth a = ao e
kg t
t, d 0 1 10 100
a, mg m -3 1 7.8 4.85x10 8 7.2x10 86
da
=
k g ( T , N , I ) a -
kr a -
kd a
dt growth respiration death
k g ( T , N , I ) =
k g ,T
N
L
Seasonal Thypo
0
Cycle in J F M A M J J A S O N D
Deep, 12
SRP
Temperate 8
Lake 4
Algal P
0
J F M A M J J A S O N D
uptake
nutrient algae
release
da
= ku n - kr a
dt
LINEAR dn
= - ku n + kr a
dt
ALGAE 20
MODELING 15 algae
10
5 nutrient
0
0 2 4 6 8 10
time
HOW DO WE GET
REALISTIC LEVELS OF ALGAE
AND CYCLES?
Introduce Environmental
Limits to Growth based on
Time-Variable Factors
Introduce Nonlinear Death
due to Predator-Prey
Interactions
kg
(a) Experiment 1:
optimal light
excess nutrients
vary temperature
kg
(b) Experiment 2:
optimal light
fixed temperature
FACTORS (20oC)
vary nutrient
INFLUENCING
PHYTOPLANKTON N
GROWTH kg
(c) Experiment 3:
fixed temperature
(20 oC)
excess nutrients
vary light
I
PHYTOPLANKTON
GROWTH
dap
= k g ,max (T ) min[ p , n , ...] ap
dt
4
linear
kg,opt
kg,20 2 optimal
0
0 Tmin 20 Topt Tmax 40
T ( o C)
TEMPERATURE DEPENDENCIES
FOR PHYTOPLANKTON GROUPS
4 Mixed
population
Greens
3
kg,T 2
Blue
(d -1 ) greens
Diatoms
1
Flagellates
0
0 10 20 30 40
T ( o C)
WHY USE THETA MODEL?
0.5
N
N =
ks +
N
0
0 ks N
Half-saturation Constant
MULTIPLE
NUTRIENT LIMITATION
na + nn pi
N = min ,
k sN + na + nn k sP + pi
STEELES LIGHT RESPONSE
MODEL
I
I 1-
Is
FLp = e
Is
FLp 1.2
0.8
0.6
0.4
0.2
0 I
0 200 Is 400 600 800 1000
I
(a) Diurnal
variation of
light t
midnight noon midnight
(b) Light
IMPACT attenuation
mixed layer
kg
(c) Dependence
of growth rate
on light
I
LIGHT LIMITATION
- ke z
- ke z I ae
+1
1 H2 1 fTp Iae -
Is
L = e dt dz
H H1 Tp 0 Is
Ia - k H Ia
- e e -
2.718 f Is Is
L = e - e
ke H
PHYTOPLANKTON
MASS BALANCE
dap
= k g ,max (T ) L min[ p , n , ...] ap- kr ap- Death
dt
c 5
( g/L)
algae
0
0 10 20 t (d)
THE WOLVES
AND
MOOSE OF
ISLE ROYALE
Lake
Superior
MOOSE AND WOLVES
SEPARATED
dM dW
= k gm M = - kd W
dt dt
100
Moose
50
Wolves
0
0 10 20
MOOSE AND WOLVES
INTERACTING
dM
= kgm M - Cwm MW
dt
dW
= - kd W + (Ywm ) Cwm MW
dt
Lotka-Volterra Equations
Alfred Vito
PREDATOR-PREY
CALCULATIONS
Prey
Predator time
PREDATOR (ZOOPLANKTON)
AND PREY (PHYTOPLANKTON)
1
mgC L-1
zoo
0.5 phyto
0 40 80
time (days)
SIMPLE NUTRIENT/
FOOD-CHAIN MODEL
ZOOPLANKTON C P
(gC m-3 ) rpc
C
rca
chl P
rpa
1-
chl
PHYTOPLANKTON chl P PHOSPHORUS
rap (mg-P m-3 )
(mg-A m-3 )
SIMPLE NUTRIENT/
FOOD-CHAIN MODEL
mgC L-1 1 total
0.5
ap z
0
0 50 100 150
time (days)
IMPLICATIONS
BENEFITS
Multiple Nutrients
Multiple Algal Groups
Top-down Control
COSTS
Weve opened a can of worms
More Data Needed
LAKE2K
hypo (3)
H3
HYPSOGRAPHIC CALCULATIONS
4.50E+05 7.00E+06
4.00E+05 6.00E+06
3.50E+05
5.00E+06
3.00E+05
2.50E+05 4.00E+06
2.00E+05 3.00E+06
1.50E+05
2.00E+06
1.00E+05
5.00E+04 1.00E+06
0.00E+00 0.00E+00
0.00 5.00 10.00 15.00 20.00 25.00 30.00
Heat
outflow
Heat
inflow
Temp
cond
WATER COLUMN KINETICS
h o
cp cd sod
x
s
o
h n dn
no na nn d r
rnc zc
s e
g
r
s rpc rnc rca zh
ran e
mi g
h p r
s ap rca
po pi rap
s s
rpc o
CALIBRATING THE
LAKE2K
WATER QUALITY MODEL
CALIBRATION STRATEGY
! Get temperature right first
(by adjusting vertical mixing)
! Then, inorganic suspended solids
(by adjusting ISS settling velocity)
! Water Quality
! Phytoplankton
! Herbivorous zooplankton
! Carnivorous zooplankton
! Inorganic phosphorus